LEFT OUTER JOIN multiple tables - using the 9i syntax

I've always written my queries using the (+) operator for outer joins. I want to start using the new ANSI standard available in 9i. I can do it when I'm joining two tables in a simple query, but how does it work when I am joining multiple tables?
Here is an example of some SQL that works with the (+) outer join syntax. How can I convert this to use the LEFT OUTER JOIN syntax?
SELECT *
FROM audit_entry aue,
audit_table aut,
audit_statement aus,
audit_row aur,
audit_row_pkey aup1,
audit_row_pkey aup2
WHERE aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
AND aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
AND aur.audit_statement_id (+) = aus.audit_statement_id
AND aup1.audit_row_id (+) = aur.audit_row_id
AND aup1.pk_column_name (+) = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
AND aup2.audit_row_id (+) = aur.audit_row_id
AND aup2.pk_column_name (+) = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
I can join audit_statement to audit_entry easy enough, but then I want to join audit_table to audit_statement, how do I do that, do I start nesting the join statements?
Thanks
Richard

Thanks for getting back so quickly, I have tried the suggested SQL with mixed results:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM audit_entry aue
JOIN audit_statement aus ON aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
JOIN audit_table aut ON aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row aur ON aur.audit_statement_id = aus.audit_statement_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup1 ON aup1.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup2 ON aup2.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
WHERE aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_TWO'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aup1.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
AND aup2.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
I had to change the order slightly, between the first two JOINs but otherwise it executed OK. My problem is, it should only return 175 rows but its returning 30625 rows. If I comment out the second reference to audit_row_pkey I get the expected result:
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM audit_entry aue
JOIN audit_statement aus ON aue.audit_entry_id = aus.audit_entry_id
JOIN audit_table aut ON aus.audit_table_id = aut.audit_table_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row aur ON aur.audit_statement_id = aus.audit_statement_id
RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup1 ON aup1.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
--RIGHT OUTER JOIN audit_row_pkey aup2 ON aup2.audit_row_id = aur.audit_row_id
WHERE aut.table_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_TWO'
AND aut.table_owner = 'CLA_JOURNAL'
AND aup1.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDTING_PK_1'
--AND aup2.pk_column_name = 'TEST_AUDITING_PK_2'
It looks the same condition is being used in each case but why do I suddenly get so many rows - its joining differently somehow. It must be to do with the order, do I need to bracket the query?
Thanks again
Richard

Similar Messages

  • Left Outer Joining multiple tables to one source table FAILS with VLD-1511

    Hi all,
    Is it me, or is OWB unable to handle left outer joining 1 source table to multiple other tables?
    I want to load a fact table so I have 1 source table with measures. This table must be outer joined to some dimensions that have their FK in the fact table.
    The SQL statement would look like this (and is perfectly valid):
    select ...
    from input, dim1, dim2
    where input.c1 = dim1.c1(+)
    and input.c2 = dim2.c2(+);
    I put the where clause in the joiner operator and validate, but that gives me message VLD-1511: A table may be outer joined to at most one other table.
    Even splitting this up into one outer join per joiner still gives this message.
    A search and look around on the forum and on metalink shows there are related issues (like bug 3334035). Seemingly creating a view is the work-around to use.....? (ie downgrading owb to a simple gui tool) }-;
    Have other people experienced this problem of not being able to outer join one input table to multiple other tables?
    Thanks,
    Ed

    I have had some feedback from Oracle. It turns out this has to do with 2 issues. Below I have pasted the text that Support gave me:
    <---------- START QUOTE ---------->
    RESEARCH
    =========
    Bug 3437036 KEY LOOKUP DOES NOT DETECT ORA-1417 IN VALIDATE/GENERATE STEP
    Unpublished Bug 4211684 FORWARD PORT OF BUG 3437036
    shows:
    Some more development has been completed when this bug is fixed in Paris.
    The following are the details:
    1. If the join condition contains a full outer join such as
    tab1.c (+) = tab2.c (+) and tab2.c (+) = tab3.c
    then the new validations implemented for this bug do not apply since
    in OWB, full outer join triggers generation of joins in ANSI syntax.
    ANSI syntax does not have the original problem the base bug of this
    bug reported.
    2. If the join condition does not contain any full outer join condition,
    then the join is generated in Oracle join syntax, which is subject two
    several restrictions. The fix to this bug check two of the restrictions.
    3. The first restriction in Oracle syntax is that the outer join operator
    "(+)" can only directly be attached to a column name. If you attach it
    to an expression, such as the following:
    (tab1.c + 1) (+) = tab2.c
    Then there will be an ORA-936 error at the time of mapping deployment.
    For this case, I have added a validation message VLD-1512 to error out
    this situation.
    4. The second restriction in Oracle syntax is that a table can only be
    outer joined to exactly one other table.
    For example, this is an invalid join in Oracle syntax:
    tab1.c (+) = tab2.c and tab1.d (+) = tab3.d
    because tab1 is left outer joined to tab2 and tab3.
    But note that the following is still valid in Oracle syntax:
    tab1.c (+) = tab2.c and tab1.d = tab3.d (+)
    because tab1 is left outer joined to tab2 and right outer joined to tab3.
    So this latter case does not violate the restriction that "same oj" to
    more than 1 table is not allowed.
    If same oj to more than 1 table is specified in a join condition,
    VLD-1511 will be issued, and the map is made invalid.
    <---------- END QUOTE ---------->
    OWB does a partial validation, ie not all access paths are (can be) checked. A full check is only done by the database itself. So some scenarios (like checking whether multiple tables are outer joined the correct way) are not checked, and in this case are flagged with an error (even though it is actually a correct scenario).
    Seemingly this was not flagged with an error in earlier versions of OWB, so beware, OWB behaviour may change when upgrading...
    Alternative solutions are (1) using key lookups, (2) using a view with all outer joins in there, (3) using intermediate result tables between the joins.
    Hope this info helps some people prevent spending too much time on a false error message,
    Ed

  • Left outer join 3 tables with where-statement

    Hi folks,
    I hope you can understand (and maybe solve) my problem.
    Generally I try to left outer join three tables. The third table is used for a WHERE-statement.
    The three table structures are the following:
    table 1 (user)   
    user1 | key
    table 2 (detail)  
    key | ID
    table 3 (header)
    ID | user2                 
    ...and I want to achieve the following structure (as example filled with data):
    user | key | ID
    |-----|----
    xy    | a    | 001
    xy    | b    | #
    z     | b     | #
    The clue ist the usage of the third table. I need the table to set user1 and user2 equal (WHERE) but there are two problems:
    1) Obviously I can't left outer join two tables with each other. In this case I already used the 'key' of table 1 to join it with the 'key' of table 2. So I can't left outer join the 'ID' of table 2 with the 'ID' of table 3. Error message that I can only left outer join a table once. Any proposals?
    2) I have to include a WHERE to equal user1 with user2. But I am not allowed to use the user2 from table 3 because of the left outer join.
    I tried this coding:
    SELECT auser1 akey b~id INTO TABLE itab FROM ( table1 AS a
      LEFT OUTER JOIN table2 AS b ON akey = bkey )
      LEFT OUTER JOIN table3 AS c ON bID = cID )
      WHERE auser1 = cuser2.
    I would really appreciate your help.
    Regards
    MrclSpdl

    IF you want to join a DB table with an internal table, you need to use the 'FOR ALL ENTRIES' statement.
    select dbfields
    into table itab2
    from dbtab
    for all entries in itab
    where dbfield1 = itab-field1.
    This will get you a second internal table with all the corresponding data for the first selection.  You can then join them with a loop through the first table and a read table on the second table (for 1 - 1 relation) or a nested loop statement on both tables (for 1 - N relation).  Make itab a hashed table when using read table with key, use a sorted table if you need to loop without key access.
    Regards,
    Freek

  • How to  Join two tables using the Inner Join

    Hi All,
    I have two tables i.e table1 and table2 as i have created two otds and my present requirement is to join this two tables and get the results and using this i need to do some logic and update another table3.
    can some one help me out how to go for the above req.
    Thanks in Advance
    Srikanth

    The best efficient way to use inner join is create two input otds,use there otd's in create a collaboration usinf etl.
    after selecting two input otd's create a inner join statement and map it to out put otd.
    while using the etl the performance of the over all integration is increased 20 time of the normal integration.
    Hopes this will helps,,
    Thanks,
    Papa Rao.

  • Joining multiple tables using ANSI join

    Hi,
    I need to join 4 tables using ANSI join. Lets say they are A,B,C adn D. A and B has a common column called x. C and D had a common column called y. I wrote a query like this
    select * from A left outer join B on (A.x=B.x),
    C left outer join D on (C.y =D.y)
    its not working!!!
    I need to use ANSI join.
    can any body help me please???

    Hi,
    But is there is any common column between A,C or B,C or D,A?
    Let me know.

  • How do you insert new records into multiple tables using the same unique primary key?

    I’ve created a PHP site and MySQL server using a free app called XAMPP.  I have successfully created a form in Dreamweaver that will write data to a (name) table in the SQL database.  Here’s my question: How do you write to two (or more) tables in the same database and pass the same primary key to both tables?  In the SQL database, I defined the first field as ID and set it as the primary key with auto update.  So, when you insert a new record, it creates a unique primary key for that record.  In my form, I’m capturing info that needs to be stored to two tables at the same time; a Name table and Address table. Since the Name and Address tables use the ID field as the primary key, I believe I will need to pass the ID value from the Name table to the insert of the Address table to insure they both have the same primary key, right?

    No. You probably need the primary key from one table to be a foreign key in the other tables. In any case, I believe you can use two methods to obtain the auto generated key. First with SQL:
    http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/getting-unique-id.html
    And the other using a PHP function:
    http://us3.php.net/mysql_insert_id

  • Left Outer Join with more than two tables in both CR 8.5 and XIR2

    I am trying to create a report and I have tried two versions of Crystal but I ultimately need the report in CR8.5 for compatibility with the client's system.  I think I am starting to figure out what might be wrong and it might be my understanding of SQL, but I can't see why someone hasn't needed this in the past. Ultimately I want to see all projects and any journal entry that might be posted for that project.
    Database is MySQL 5.0.38 and using MySQL ODBC driver 3.51.19.
    Project header table information will be populated. Each line item on a journal entry can be tagged with the project ID. But for me to pull the journal entry date I need also to link to a third table for the journal entry header info.
    I want to see all projects, whether a journal entry has been posted or not.
    So the links are like this
    ProjectHeader --->Left Outer Join ---> JELines ---> Inner Join ---> JEHeader
    I think in this scenerio Crystal is treating the LOJ as an IJ.
    I created two brand new reports today, one in CR8.5 and one in CR XIR2. Once I edited the automatic CR8.5 SQL statement (which I have been doing for years, usually without problem), they both ran properly. I linked customers to their invoices. Customers without invoices showed properly. But then I linked the invoices to the payments of the invoices and immediately lost customers without orders in both reports.
    So apparently only two tables are allowed in Outer Joins. Does this make sense?  I checked out the w3schools tutorial on SQL and it doesn't mention this limitation and I can't find anywhere else that it specifically indicates this but all samples of code I have seen only show two tables.  I just thought for presentation as a sample that was easiest to understand and we could expand as necessary.
    If this is correct, how does one go about accounting for this kind of thing?  One solution that goes through my mind is creating a view at the database level for the link between journal entry lines and journal entry headers.  Would this be a good solution under normal circumstances?
    A second option that I had to implement because of timelines, is to use a subreport linked to the main report through the project ID to pull the information for the journal entries and just pass the totals I need to the main report through a shared variable.
    These aren't normal circumstances because I don't have access to the database so I can't create the view.  I have come across this concept several times and I have been able to use subreports to solve it but I am trying to find a better solution for the future as sometimes subreports can be slow.  So are there any alternatives I have not considered here?
    TIA rasinc

    So after some more work and another post.  I was able to get this to work.
    Items disappear when linking to another table
    My issues were two fold.  I was selecting on the tables on the right-side of the original Inner Join.  However, I was checking for Nulls.  This apparently is correct but you must check for the Nulls first eg. (IsNull (JEHeader.Field1) OR JEHeader.Field1 <= 100).  I had my original statement reversed checking for <= 100 before checking for Nulls.
    I also did not set all links to be Left Outer Join.  I had the Inner Join.  I actually have about 6 tables in this report so all the links need to be set Outer Join.  So this now seems to be corrected.
    Thanks

  • Using Left Outer Join

    Hi SAP,
    I have an access database with table called "Employee_ID".  I am linking this table to a table called "Sales" in our main database and trying to report on January 2009.
    There is one employee that is not appearing in my report.  I know this employee has had no sales in Jan 2009.  So, I tried linking the table using Left Outer Join and still this employee is not appearing in my report.
    As a test, when I bring in Employee_ID table alone, the missing employee appears but when I try linking it INNER or LEFT OUTER join to table Sales, this employee does not appear.
    Any help how I can bring the employee in from table Employee_ID?
    Many thanks in advance,
    Zack H.

    Carl & Raghavendra,
    Your suggestion led me to the finding my solution.  Your suggestion brought back the missing employee but I needed all employees that had sales in January 2009 AND those that didn't.  So I had to tweak your select expert formula as follows:
    isnull({Sales.amt}) or
    {Sales.period}="0109"
    This brought back everything as needed!  There was one negative about using this method.  The performance was poor.  It took a really long time to run.
    To avoid having to wait for this to run and increase the performance, I had to go into the database and add a $0.00 sales amt for employee 2040 (or an empty sales amount record) in the month of January 2009.  This brought back everyone also and it obviously increased the performance exponentially.  Curious, why does it take forever to run using the above formula in select expert?
    Thank you both Raghavendra and Carl for your relentless efforts to find a solution.  You did it!
    Zack H.

  • Left outer join with multiple conditions

    Is it possible to add to a left outer join (= anyOfAllowingNone) more than the primary condition (in SQL this would be added per "and").
    Background: The execution plan of the produced SQL shows large results on which the final filter is applied although I have conditions that would decrease this last result set much earlier...

    There is no easy way to do this in TopLink expressions, other than including the join in the regular where clause as you have done. Does it make a big impact in the performance of your query?
    <p>
    You could use custom SQL for the query.
    <p>
    Or you could potentially define a OneToOneQueryKey in your TopLink descriptor that includes the additional join criteria and call anyOfAllowingNone using this query key.
    <p>
    <p>---
    <p>James Sutherland

  • Using Left Outer Join along with reference

    I have three tables.
    Table 1 : BOOK_DETAILS
    Fields: BOOK_ID, BOOK_NAME
    Table 2: BOOK_ISSUE_RECORD
    Fields: BOOK_ID, USER_NAME
    Table 3: BOOK_AUTHOR
    Fields: BOOK_ID, AUTHOR_NAME
    I have to link Table 1 and Table 2 with Left outer Join because even if the book is not issues to anyone, its name should come.
    Again I have to display the Book Author name for each Book.
    I am able to create a query with the Left outer join between Table 1 and Table 2. However I am not able to give a reference to the Table 3.
    Can any one please help me with this.
    Regards
    Hawker

    select  d.book_name,
            a.book_author,
            i.user_name
      from       book_details d
            join
                 book_author a
              on (d.book_id = a.book_id)
            left join
                 book_issue_recors i
              on (d.book_id = i.book_id)
    /SY.

  • How to join multiple tables !

    Give me the Example to join multiple tables 1

    Inner join
    IF p_bsart IS INITIAL.
    SELECT ekko~bukrs
    ekko~lifnr
    ekko~ebeln
    ekko~waers
    ekko~bsart
    ekko~ekorg
    ekko~ekgrp
    ekpo~ebelp
    ekpo~txz01
    ekpo~matnr
    ekpo~werks
    ekpo~menge
    ekpo~meins
    ekpo~netpr
    ekpo~netwr
    INTO TABLE t_itab1 FROM
    ekko INNER JOIN ekpo ON ekkoebeln = ekpoebeln
    WHERE ekko~ebeln IN s_ebeln AND
    ekko~bukrs IN s_bukrs AND
    ekko~lifnr IN s_lifnr AND
    ekko~ekorg IN s_ekorg AND
    ekko~ekgrp IN s_ekgrp AND
    ekpo~matnr IN s_matnr.
    The difference between an INNER JOIN and an OUTER JOIN is the following. If a query on an INNER JOIN of VBAK (outer table) and VBAP (inner table) finds a record in VBAK but no matching records in VBAP, then no data is retrieved from the database because the inner table is empty. If you still want to keep VBAK rows for which there are no matching VBAP rows, you need to use the OUTER JOIN construct available in ABAP/4 Open SQL in 4.x..
    Hi
    Syntax
    ... [(] {dbtab_left [AS tabalias_left]} | join
    {[INNER] JOIN}|{LEFT [OUTER] JOIN}
    {dbtab_right [AS tabalias_right] ON join_cond} [)] ... .
    Effect
    The join syntax represents a recursively nestable join expression. A join expression consists of a left-hand and a right- hand side, which are joined either by means of [INNER] JOIN or LEFT [OUTER] JOIN . Depending on the type of join, a join expression can be either an inner ( INNER) or an outer (LEFT OUTER) join. Every join expression can be enclosed in round brackets. If a join expression is used, the SELECT command circumvents SAP buffering.
    On the left-hand side, either a single database table, a view dbtab_left, or a join expression join can be specified. On the right-hand side, a single database table or a view dbtab_right as well as join conditions join_cond can be specified after ON. In this way, a maximum of 24 join expressions that join 25 database tables or views with each other can be specified after FROM.
    AS can be used to specify an alternative table name tabalias for each of the specified database table names or for every view. A database table or a view can occur multiple times within a join expression and, in this case, have various alternative names.
    The syntax of the join conditions join_cond is the same as that of the sql_cond conditions after the addition WHERE, with the following differences:
    At least one comparison must be specified after ON.
    Individual comparisons may be joined using AND only.
    All comparisons must contain a column in the database table or the view dbtab_right on the right-hand side as an operand.
    The following language elements may not be used: BETWEEN, LIKE, IN.
    No sub-queries may be used.
    For outer joins, only equality comparisons (=, EQ) are possible.
    If an outer join occurs after FROM, the join condition of every join expression must contain at least one comparison between columns on the left-hand and the right-hand side.
    In outer joins, all comparisons that contain columns as operands in the database table or the view dbtab_right on the right-hand side must be specified in the corresponding join condition. In the WHERE condition of the same SELECT command, these columns are not allowed as operands.
    Resulting set for inner join
    The inner join joins the columns of every selected line on the left- hand side with the columns of all lines on the right-hand side that jointly fulfil the join_cond condition. A line in the resulting set is created for every such line on the right-hand side. The content of the column on the left-hand side may be duplicated in this case. If none of the lines on the right-hand side fulfils the join_cond condition, no line is created in the resulting set.
    Resulting set for outer join
    The outer join basically creates the same resulting set as the inner join, with the difference that at least one line is created in the resulting set for every selected line on the left-hand side, even if no line on the right-hand side fulfils the join_cond condition. The columns on the right-hand side that do not fulfil the join_cond condition are filled with null values.
    Example
    Join the columns carrname, connid, fldate of the database tables scarr, spfli and sflight by means of two inner joins. A list is created of the flights from p_cityfr to p_cityto. Alternative names are used for every table.
    PARAMETERS: p_cityfr TYPE spfli-cityfrom,
    p_cityto TYPE spfli-cityto.
    DATA: BEGIN OF wa,
    fldate TYPE sflight-fldate,
    carrname TYPE scarr-carrname,
    connid TYPE spfli-connid,
    END OF wa.
    DATA itab LIKE SORTED TABLE OF wa
    WITH UNIQUE KEY fldate carrname connid.
    SELECT ccarrname pconnid f~fldate
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab
    FROM ( ( scarr AS c
    INNER JOIN spfli AS p ON pcarrid = ccarrid
    AND p~cityfrom = p_cityfr
    AND p~cityto = p_cityto )
    INNER JOIN sflight AS f ON fcarrid = pcarrid
    AND fconnid = pconnid ).
    LOOP AT itab INTO wa.
    WRITE: / wa-fldate, wa-carrname, wa-connid.
    ENDLOOP.
    Example
    Join the columns carrid, carrname and connid of the database tables scarr and spfli using an outer join. The column connid is set to the null value for all flights that do not fly from p_cityfr. This null value is then converted to the appropriate initial value when it is transferred to the assigned data object. The LOOP returns all airlines that do not fly from p_cityfr.
    PARAMETERS p_cityfr TYPE spfli-cityfrom.
    DATA: BEGIN OF wa,
    carrid TYPE scarr-carrid,
    carrname TYPE scarr-carrname,
    connid TYPE spfli-connid,
    END OF wa,
    itab LIKE SORTED TABLE OF wa
    WITH NON-UNIQUE KEY carrid.
    SELECT scarrid scarrname p~connid
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab
    FROM scarr AS s
    LEFT OUTER JOIN spfli AS p ON scarrid = pcarrid
    AND p~cityfrom = p_cityfr.
    LOOP AT itab INTO wa.
    IF wa-connid = '0000'.
    WRITE: / wa-carrid, wa-carrname.
    ENDIF.
    ENDLOOP.

  • Sql help (left outer join)

    Hi All,
    I am referring 2 regular tables from the HR schema which you get when you install Oracle 9i , Now the issue is that I want all the rows from my employees table even if the row doesnt have the salary equal to 2500.
    Here is my Sql:
    select e.employee_id
         , e.first_name
         , e.last_name
         , e.salary
         , e.department_id e_dep_id
         , d.department_id d_dep_id
         , d.department_name
         , d.location_id
    from employees e
    , departments d
    where 1 = 1
         And e.department_id = d.department_id(+) And e.SALARY = 2500
    I am achieving my result set from the below query though(its just a syntactical problem) , please help :
    select e.employee_id
         , e.first_name
         , e.last_name
         , e.salary
         , e.department_id e_dep_id
         , d.department_id d_dep_id
         , d.department_name
         , d.location_id
    from employees e left outer join
    departments d
    on e.department_id = d.department_id And e.SALARY = 2500
    Regards
    Rahul

    Mac_Freak_Rahul wrote:
    Well my requirement is to pull all the records from my driving table(ie employees) doesnt matter weather the condition satisfies or not. Just to add to that lets say I would need to bring another table and my join criteria involves data from the employees table and the third table(in this case I need to make sure that all the rows from my driving table remains and doesnt get filter out). Please help my only problem is of the new syntax of outer joins.
    Regards
    RahulRahul,
    Why do you want to use "oracle only syntax ( + )"? I highly recommend you to use ANSI syntax, it's much more readable:
    This is from Oracle's documents:
    Oracle recommends that you use the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax rather than the Oracle join operator. Outer join queries that use the Oracle join operator (+) are subject to the following > rules and restrictions, which do not apply to the FROM clause OUTER JOIN syntax:
    You cannot specify the (+) operator in a query block that also contains FROM clause join syntax.
    The (+) operator can appear only in the WHERE clause or, in the context of left-correlation (that is, when specifying the TABLE clause) in the FROM clause, and can be applied only to a column > of a table or view.
    If A and B are joined by multiple join conditions, then you must use the (+) operator in all of these conditions. If you do not, then Oracle Database will return only the rows resulting from a > simple join, but without a warning or error to advise you that you do not have the results of an outer join.
    The (+) operator does not produce an outer join if you specify one table in the outer query and the other table in an inner query.
    You cannot use the (+) operator to outer-join a table to itself, although self joins are valid. For example, the following statement is not valid:
    -- The following statement is not valid:
    SELECT employee_id, manager_id
    FROM employees
    WHERE employees.manager_id(+) = employees.employee_id;
    However, the following self join is valid:
    SELECT e1.employee_id, e1.manager_id, e2.employee_id
    FROM employees e1, employees e2
    WHERE e1.manager_id(+) = e2.employee_id;
    The (+) operator can be applied only to a column, not to an arbitrary expression. However, an arbitrary expression can contain one or more columns marked with the (+) operator.
    A WHERE condition containing the (+) operator cannot be combined with another condition using the OR logical operator.
    A WHERE condition cannot use the IN comparison condition to compare a column marked with the (+) operator with an expression.
    A WHERE condition cannot compare any column marked with the (+) operator with a subquery.Best Regards,
    Gokhan
    If this question is answered, please mark appropriate posts as correct/helpful and the thread as closed. Thanks

  • Nested Left Outer Join : Data Set

    Hi All
    I am bit confused about data set used by Nested Left outer join.
    Can anyone help me.
    Here is sample data:
    Tables (Name, 3 Column each, total rows and matched rows if any):
         Table 1          
         A     B     C
         Total 20 Rows          
         Table 2          
         A     D     E
         Total 50 Rows and 10 Matching on      2.A = 1.A     
         Table 3          
         D     M     N
         Total 15 Rows and 15 Matching on 3.D = 2.D     
         Table 4          
         M     X     Y
         Total 20 Rows and 10 Matching on 4.M = 3.M     
    Sql
    select *
    From Table 1
    Left Outer Join on Table 2 on
                   2.A = 1.A
    -- Data set 1 will contain 20 Rows (10 matching and 10 non matching)
    Left Outer Join on Table 3 on
                   3.D = 2.D
    -- What will be data set? 20 Rows of Data set 1 or 15 Matching Rows?
    Left Outer Join on Table 4 on
                   4.M = 3.M
    -- What will be data set? X Rows of Data set 2 or 10 Matching Rows?
    Please have a look and clear my understanding.

    SeshuGiri wrote:
    I have two tables defined (below). Emp table has data and there is no data in Emp_Type table yet! Right now it is empty.
    I want to write a query that returns data from both the tables even though there is no data in Emp_type table. I am using left outer join but it returning nothing. Anyone can help?
    select *
    from emp e
    left outer join emp_Type t
    on e.empid = t.empid
    WHERE t.type_id = 1
    and t.end_date is null;
    The join is including all rows from emp, just like you want.
    The WHERE clause is discarding all of those rows. Since all the columns from emp_type (alias t) are NULL, the condition "t.type_id = 1" in the WHERE clause is never true.
    Perhaps you meant to include all those conditions in the join conditions, like this:
    select *
      from emp e
      left outer join emp_Type t
        on e.empid = t.empid
       and t.type_id = 1
       and t.end_date is null;Edited by: Frank Kulash on Jan 30, 2012 3:56 PM

  • Left outer join in ODI

    I am trying to do left outer join in ODI for the source tables in SQLserver.
    I have created a join between 2 columns and made it left outer join by checking the box in join properties.
    It is not working as expected. In the query it just does T1.Col1=T2.col1 and makes it as equi join.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks

    I have the same problem..
    For example:
    Interface:
    SOURCE: tbl_employee, tbl_positions
    TARGET: tbl_persons
    In ANSI SQL it would be:
    INSERT INTO tbl_persons (..., position_name)
    select ..., tbl_positions.name from tbl_employee left join tbl_positions on tbl_employee.pos_id = tbl_positions.id
    But when I execute Interface, inserted data as JOIN, didn't inserted "NULL" in position_name.
    "LEFT JOIN" is in Interface's script...
    How decide this problem?

  • SQL Loader : Loading multiple tables using same ctl file

    Hi ,
    We tried loading multiple tables using the same ctl file but the data was not loaded and no errors were thrown.
    The ctl file content is summarised below :
    LOAD DATA
    APPEND INTO TABLE TABLE_ONE
    when record_type ='EVENT'
    TRAILING NULLCOLS
    record_type char TERMINATED BY ',' ,
    EVENT_SOURCE_FIELD CHAR TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    EVENT_DATE DATE "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS" TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    EVENT_COST INTEGER EXTERNAL TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    EVENT_ATTRIB_1 CHAR TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    VAT_STATUS INTEGER EXTERNAL TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    ACCOUNT_REFERENCE CONSTANT 'XXX',
    bill_date "to_date('02-'||to_char(sysdate,'mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy')",
    data_date "trunc(sysdate)",
    load_date_time "sysdate"
    INTO TABLE TABLE_TWO
    when record_type ='BILLSUMMARYRECORD'
    TRAILING NULLCOLS
    RECORD_TYPE char TERMINATED BY ',' ,
    NET_TOTAL INTEGER EXTERNAL TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    LOAD_DATE_TIME "sysdate"
    INTO TABLE BILL_BKP_ADJUSTMENTS
    when record_type ='ADJUSTMENTS'
    TRAILING NULLCOLS
    RECORD_TYPE char TERMINATED BY ',' ,
    ADJUSTMENT_NAME CHAR TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    LOAD_DATE_TIME "sysdate"
    INTO TABLE BILL_BKP_CUSTOMERRECORD
    when record_type ='CUSTOMERRECORD'
    TRAILING NULLCOLS
    RECORD_TYPE char TERMINATED BY ',' ,
    GENEVA_CUSTOMER_REF CHAR TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    LOAD_DATE_TIME "sysdate"
    INTO TABLE TABLE_THREE
    when record_type ='PRODUCTCHARGE'
    TRAILING NULLCOLS
    RECORD_TYPE char TERMINATED BY ',' ,
    PROD_ATTRIB_1_CHRG_DESC CHAR TERMINATED BY ',' ENCLOSED BY '"',
    LOAD_DATE_TIME "sysdate"
    Has anyone faced similar errors or are we going wrong somewhere ?
    Regards,
    Sandipan

    This is the info on the discard in the log file :
    Record 1: Discarded - failed all WHEN clauses.
    Record 638864: Discarded - failed all WHEN clauses.
    While some of the records were loaded for one table.
    Regards,
    Sandipan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Migrating SQL Script to stored procedure...

    I created a SQL script file to run in SQLPlus to generate a fixed-format text file (See EDI_PrepForSend below) How do i do the same thing in a stored package/procedure? Can I utilize the script I already have working? I need to do it in a stored proc

  • Hi, i cannot open mail 10.4.11

    Hi , I cannot open mail on my mac pro 10.4.11 i have  tried disk utilitys.

  • Java.exe with 9ias

    Has anyone out there run into an issue with java.exe and 9ias running on NT4.0? It seems that java.exe reaches approx. 40MB then we get an apache.exe Dr. Watson error and our server is down. If anyone can help I would greatly appreciate it. null

  • How to remove Safari 5 from pc with xp.....add/remove does not work

    Looking for help removing Safari 5 from my PC using XP. Add/Remove program will not uninstall it.

  • Create a new webcatalog

    Hello: I´m new in the OBI 11G world. I´ve installed a VM with obi 11g. In the end, I finally got It work fine. I´ve migrated an obi 10g rpd+webcat successfully. Now I need to create a new repository and a new web catalog. I was found how to create th