Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 final releases are available

Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available as final releases on Adobe.com and through the update mechanisms available in Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3.  These updates include additional lens profiles support among others. Check out http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/. Following the example of Adobe's collaboration with SIGMA, leading lens manufacturers such as Pentax, Tamron and Zeiss worked closely with Adobe to create some of the profiles.
-Simon

Excellent! Now if there were only a way to use my S95 in raw... I guess I'll have to wait another few months

Similar Messages

  • Lightroom 2.3 and Camera Raw 5.3 Available - Note from Adobe

    Lightroom 2.3 and Camera Raw 5.3 are now available as release candidates on Adobe Labs.
    Lightroom 2.3, http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_2.3
    Camera Raw 5.3, http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Camera_Raw_5.3
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Adobe Systems

    Hi All:
    based on the good work of Dorin above (post #19), he did a timeline of various releases of Lightroom from Adobe and it shows that from "version x RC" to "final release version" was around 1 month.
    as it is already exactly one month now, it must not be too much longer till they will release the LR2.3 Final Version.
    As for what Robert said in post #23, well, there's never any "guarantee" on a problem-free piece of software, or, for that matter, anything one purchases or anything in life, actually!! Yet, one can make educated extrapolations, right? From the range of comments thus far on LR2.3RC, it appears that it is the best version yet of LR2.x. This leads to the conclusion that it is probably a "good bet" that this version will likely lead to the least amount of issues, right? Maybe not "zero issues", but most likely, the least amount of issues from the various LR2.x versions available.
    So by waiting, say, merely 1-3 more weeks approximately, i can go directly from LR1.4 (which i've been using for many months) to LR2.3 Final Release Version. It seems like it is a prudent and conservative move or plan.
    What do the good folks here think, please?
    thanks in advance for helping me to mull this over. If i were a PC expert, i'd be thinking about this less. as i'm just a somewhat competent user, and not a whiz, i thought that a bit of care and planning it out intelligently can possibly reduce frustrations later.

  • Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Now Available

    Final releases of Lightroom 3.2, DNG Converter 6.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 are now available.  Additional details here: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-and-camera-raw-6-2-now-avail able.html
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Lightroom, Camera Raw, DNG Product Manager

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Hudechrome wrote:
    You have a wild hair about Bridge, Noel?
    Not at all.  I like good tools, and from everything I read Bridge is marvelous.  I don't have anything against Bridge, I just don't need it.
    As a computer engineer, I use my computer for WAY more than just Photoshop.  As such, I do everything I can to have the operating system (via Windows Explorer) integrate things for me.
    For example, via right-click or double-click or drag and drop onto icons:
    I access my configuration management system from Explorer (Tortoise SubVersion).
    I do searches (grepWin) from Explorer.
    I compare things (Beyond Compare) from Explorer.
    I start Photoshop and other image tools on raw and processed image files I manage with Explorer.
    I start my development tools (Visual Studio and a host of utilities) from Explorer (e.g., double click .sln files).
    I access my web sites with Explorer (via WebDrive).
    I get file paths from Explorer (right click, Send to Clipboard as Name).
    I access office management apps from Explorer (e.g., double click .doc or .xls files).
    This is an abbreviated list.  Explorer can be a VERY powerful integrator, and is at the center of my computing world at a higher level.  So now you can start to imagine why I prefer Explorer for image work.
    -Noel

  • Lightroom 3.2 and Camera Raw 6.2 Release Candidate on Available on Adobe Labs

    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/08/lightroom-3-2-and-camera-raw-6-2-available -on-adobe-labs.html
    with additional lens profiles available.

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}Hudechrome wrote:
    You have a wild hair about Bridge, Noel?
    Not at all.  I like good tools, and from everything I read Bridge is marvelous.  I don't have anything against Bridge, I just don't need it.
    As a computer engineer, I use my computer for WAY more than just Photoshop.  As such, I do everything I can to have the operating system (via Windows Explorer) integrate things for me.
    For example, via right-click or double-click or drag and drop onto icons:
    I access my configuration management system from Explorer (Tortoise SubVersion).
    I do searches (grepWin) from Explorer.
    I compare things (Beyond Compare) from Explorer.
    I start Photoshop and other image tools on raw and processed image files I manage with Explorer.
    I start my development tools (Visual Studio and a host of utilities) from Explorer (e.g., double click .sln files).
    I access my web sites with Explorer (via WebDrive).
    I get file paths from Explorer (right click, Send to Clipboard as Name).
    I access office management apps from Explorer (e.g., double click .doc or .xls files).
    This is an abbreviated list.  Explorer can be a VERY powerful integrator, and is at the center of my computing world at a higher level.  So now you can start to imagine why I prefer Explorer for image work.
    -Noel

  • I have Lightroom 3.6 and Camera Raw 6.6 but I can't open my CR2 files from my Canon eos 6D

    Hi,
    I have Lightroom 3.6 and Camera Raw 6.6 but I can't open my CR2 files from my Canon eos 6D
    Lightroom doesn't show a thumbnail image and when trying to import it says the camera format isn't supported. But normaly Camera raw 6.6 should cover the Canon eos 6D
    All help is welcome,
    Thanks

    No, the older versions are not free.  If you upgrade you will have to get Lr5 unless you can still find Lr4 for sale somewhere as it has been discontinued by Adobe.  You can also use the FREE DNG converter to convert the 6d files for use in Lr3.6.

  • Lightroom 2.7 and Camera Raw 5.7 Release Candidates now Available

    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2010/04/camera_raw_57_and_lightroom_27.html
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Adobe Systems

    Tom Hogarty wrote:
    Here is a draft of my final release notes for working with Lightroom 3 and Camera Raw 5.7:
    Viewing Lightroom 3 settings in Camera Raw 5.7
    Before working in conjunction with Lightroom 3 and Camera Raw please set the Camera Raw preference to: Save image settings in: Sidecar ".xmp" files.  By default Camera Raw will display the image adjustments exactly as performed in Lightroom’s develop module.  However, at this time Camera Raw 5.7 is unable to support further adjustments to the following settings or tools:
    Highlight      Priority and Color Priority post-crop vignette
    Enhanced      Luminance and Color Noise Reduction
    Grain effects
    Process Version
    Lightroom is also dependent on a compatible version of the Camera Raw plug-in for the "Edit in Photoshop" functionality to work properly.  Camera Raw 5.7 will ensure that Lightroom 3 beta 2 will maintain that compatible functionality with Photoshop CS4.
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Adobe Systems
    That seems to clarify the interoperability of ACR 5.7 and LR 3.  Thank you for that, Mr. Hogarty.
    Now, for the benefit of those of use who are not and/or will not be using Lightroom 3 for whatever reason, perhaps Mr. Chan or you can address the question of whether ACR 5.7 RC has a different or improved Noise Reduction functionality over that of ACR 5.6, and/or whether this will be the case for the final, GM release of ACR 5.7.  Let's leave any and all versions of LR out of the equation for a second, please.
    I think I see improved Noise Reduction in ACR 5.7 RC, but I wonder if this is real or whether I've just improved my skills in handling the noise reduction sliders since earlier versions. 
    Thanks.
    Wo Tai Lao Le
    我太老了

  • Lightroom 2.3 and Camera Raw 5.3

    I've been Googling and searching high and low on my harddrive, for a location for the Camera Raw.8bi file. I've downloaded the new v5.3, and wanted to replace/update, but I cannot figure where I'm supposed to put the .8bi file.
    PS! I don't have Photoshop installed, I only have Lightroom.

    On Windows, C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe\Plug-Ins\CS4\File Formats. But you don't need it for Lightroom, and you don't have what to do with it without Photoshop CS4.
    If you already have Lightroom 2.3 — that's all you need, if not — update Lightroom.

  • Important Note Regarding Lightroom 2.5 and Camera Raw 5.5 for those using PowerPC

    I just posted a blog entry on an issue with Ligthroom 2.5, Camera Raw 5.5 and DNG Converter 5.5 that affects Mac PowerPC customers.  Please read the entry here:  http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2009/09/important_note_regarding_light.html
    Unfortunately, the comments on the Lightroom Journal blog do not seem to be functioning so please comment in this thread.
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Adobe Systems
    Lightroom, Camera Raw, DNG Product Manager

    There was a request for further clarity on how to revert to Camera Raw 5.4.  Please follow these instructions:
    1. Close Photoshop CS4 and Bridge CS4
    2. Download the Camera Raw 5.4 plug-in from the following location: http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=4521
    3. Navigate to: (Please read directory carefully)
    Library/Application Support/Adobe/Plug-Ins/CS4/File Formats
    4. Delete the Camera Raw.plug-in file located in that directory
    5. Open the Camera_Raw_5_4 DMG file downloaded in step 2
    6. Copy the Camera Raw.plug-file from the DMG file into the direcotry indicated in step 3.
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Adobe Systems

  • Lightroom 1.2 and Camera Raw 4.2 now available

    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty

    The same ACR 4.2 plugin is used for CS3 and for PSE5.0...
    According to Adobe's ACR 4.2 readme:
    > The Camera Raw 4.2 plug-in is not compatible with versions of Photoshop earlier than Photoshop CS3 or versions of Photoshop Elements earlier than Photoshop Elements 4.0 for Macintosh or Photoshop Elements 5.0 for Windows.
    So you should be good to go with PSE5.0, just download/install your plugin.
    i Edit: Here's the link for download (Choose win or mac about 1/4 way down): http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop/cameraraw.html

  • Lightroom 2.5 and Camera Raw 5.5 Now Available

    More details here:  http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2009/09/lightroom_25_and_camera_raw_55.html
    Regards,
    Tom Hogarty
    Lightroom, Camera Raw, DNG Product Manager

    Thanks for your update Tom.
    I will install both but wanted to ask about a recovery slider issue I was seeing with Canon RAW files & homemade DNG profiles in Lightroom.
    The recovery slider was shifting colors towards magenta as more was applied..
    Has this been addressed with the ACR 5.5 release?
    If so, do I need to re-make all of me homemade DNG profiles after installing ACR 5.5?
    Thanks

  • Lightroom 1.3 and Camera Raw 4.3 now available

    See below:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2007/11/lightroom_13_the_export_sdk_pr.html
    Regards,
    Tom

    Just downloaded DNG_Camera_Raw_4_2.zip (for Windows), and the DNG Converter 4.2 indeed converts Sony A-700 ARW files so Camera Raw 3.7 can happily develop them. Never expected ACR support for the A-700 to happen so quickly; this camera was officially introduced last week and and will be available for purchase from next month on or so. Well done, Sony and Adobe!
    And no, I don't have an A-700; I downloaded the ARW files from the Internet.
    -- Olaf

  • Camera Raw 4.5 final release?

    Now it's been four weeks since Camera Raw 4.5 Release Candidate (ACR 4.5.0.161) was brought to us via Adobe Labs. Does anyone have any issues with it? I don't. Does anyone have an idea when the final release is supposed to arrive? I feel a four-week testing period is more than adequate for a tentative version that's supposed to be a "Release Candidate" (however the plug-in calls itself "4.5 Beta" ... go figure).
    Another Camera Raw version most likely will be due in October, to support all the new digital cameras and backs that (hopefully) will get introduced at Photokina in September. I wonder if that's going to be ACR 4.6 ... or will ACR 4.5 "Grand Master" (which means "final release" in Adobe speak) be deferred until then?
    -- Olaf

    Jeff Schewe wrote:
    > Fortunately, it's not your job
    > to worry about it, is it?
    Fortunately not, indeed.
    Jeff further wrote:
    > If you are unhappy [...] you are under
    > no obligation to use it if you don't want to.
    Huh? The conclusions you're drawing from my thinking aloud are, umm ... strange, to say the least. If you feel my inquiry was inappropriate and/or pointless then your reply also is.
    Actually, I am quite happy with ACR 4.5RC, and furthermore I didn't hear anybody else reporting any problems. And that's exactly why I'm wondering why the final release isn't out yet. I guess I'd be less wondering if this tentative version had been announced and communicated as Beta rather than as Release Candidate. Anyway ... I'm just curious. It does not mean I was unhappy in any way.
    Jeff further wrote:
    > ... so, you'll just have to wait, huh?
    Yes, obviously.
    Jeff further wrote:
    > Hey, it's nice out, go shoot something ...
    Glad to hear it's nice on your side of the Big Pond, too.
    -- Olaf

  • Lightroom 3.4 and Camera Raw 6.4

    I like the interface. There were some subtle changes. I don't like the import dialogue menu. Find it more confusing that the previous dialogue box setup. Suggestions:
    1) Add a 3rd level customization. I take a lot of images per month and sometimes on the same day and it would be create folders for those events instead of importing them with a custom name and drag n drop the files into a folder later.
    2)Add option to modify date format, and customization.
    3) Add video editing tab in future releases. Maybe in LR4 or 5. I use a Canon 5D Mark II now and I can do HD video. It would be nice if there was a tab for some basic video editing. Something similar to iMovie 3.
    Needs Improvements:
    1) The Sharpening tools. The algorithms are ok but LR can do better. It would be nice to have more control over what is being sharpened such as luminosity.
    2) Vignetting has improved but we are still limited on some parameters.
    Keep
    1) I noticed the shadow when you scroll to the photos in the lower pane in the develop tab and library tab. That's cool. 
    I'll add more suggestions in the days to come.
    Cheers,
    Claudia Robinson

    seermusician wrote:
    Needs Improvements:
    1) The Sharpening tools. The algorithms are ok but LR can do better. It would be nice to have more control over what is being sharpened such as luminosity.
    First off, you know there's a Lightroom Feature Request forum, right?
    As far as the sharpening is concerned, LR is already only sharpening the luminance data not the color data. You already have the ability to add edge masking and you can subtract the strength of the sharpening in the Detail panel by using a minus sharpening Adjustment Bush. Pretty important to understand how to use a tool before going to far when asking for changes...

  • Problems with Nikon Coolpix P7700 and Lightroom 4.4 with camera raw 7.4.

    When I import raw (NRW) files (size 3000 x 4000 pixels) from my Nikon Coolpix P7700 to Lightroom 4.4 (camera raw 7.4) it seems that Lightroom doubles file sizes. In Metadata section I can see that picture´s file size is 25.xx Mb. Camera´s sensor size is, however, only 12 Mb. I have also Nikon D300 and imported raw files (size 3000 x 4000 pixels) in Lightroom 4.4. are varying between 12.xx and 16.xx Mb. I´m very confused about the situation. I have iMac 27" (late 2007) and operating system is Mac OSX 10.8.4. Can somebody explain what is happening. Is there a bug in Lightroom 4.4 and Camera Raw 7.4 or what?
    Thank you in advance
    Eero

    You are mixing megapixels (your camera takes 12 megapixel photos) with megabytes (the file size). These two different units cannot be compared, and I conclude from the numbers you have provided that nothing is wrong.

  • "Edit In" Photoshop CC not working for RAW or DNG files after applying LR 5.3 and Camera Raw 8.3

    I just applied the Lightroom 5.3 and Camera Raw 8.3 updates and now am no longer able to open RAW or DNG files into Photoshop CC. When I select a file and choose "Edit In" Photoshop, photoshop will launch, then nothing will happen. After 2 to 5 minutes, an error will popup in Lightroom saying "The file could not be edited because Adobe Photoshop CC could not be launched." An error I've never seen before. When I click "Ok", Lightroom will show that it's "preparing a file for editing" in the upper left, it will create and save a psd to disk and in the catalog (another new behavior), then it will open in photoshop. All other file types (jpgs, tiff, psd) seem to work/open fine between applications. No difference if I open photoshop prior to selecting "Edit In". Selecting "Edit In" other applications, like Viveza, work fine.
    I tried first deleting preference files in both applications. No luck. Ditto for plugins. Notta. Eventually I completely uninstalled and fresh installed Photoshop, Lightroom, and Bridge from the cloud. Same deal...can't open raw/dng files into Photoshop.
    I'm at a complete loss, dead in the water, with a mountain of editing work piling on top of me. Kicking myself for applying the upgrades, which I had been delaying for some time to avoid just such a cluster%#$. Ugh.
    I'm on a PC running Windows 7 64bit.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    In the normal situation, LR needs to see a PS installed for it to detect the Edit In PS option is possible, so if you uninstall both, then install PS, first, then LR.  Of course with this release there may be some hiccup that requires installing either one or the other, again, but if you've uninstalled both and are reinstalling both, then install PS, first.

Maybe you are looking for