Lightroom to Photoshop and back logic

Hi Lightroom/Photoshop wizards,
I work in LR and PS CC.  I am now working for someone else and want to make sure that our edited images end up in lightroom after editing in a logical manner so that we can easily see which images will be used for our photo albums.
Here is how I am working:
Import photos into LR, give 4 star rating to images that will go into album
Make some LR edits
Edit photo with PS (directly from LR)
Save image in PS
go through all images to hand pick the ones that I want in the album (now there are copies) This is the part where everything falls apart.  I end up with redundant files and I can't distinguish the finished ones (other than looking one by one to determine the correct version to use).  Is there a logical way to handle this?
Export to separate "album" folder selected images
Also, one extra question, If I am working with high res jpegs (rather than raw), how do I maintain the size of the files?  I exported original file and it did not carry with it any changes made in Lightroom.
Thanks!
Lisa

I am sorry if I was not clear. I was thinking that there might be a quick and simple way to identify or flag images that I want to track for say and album.  I want to eliminate any confusion or taking the wrong version of a file.  Perhaps I should just ask what a reliable, logical workflow is when working in LR/PS round tripping.  Perhaps making PS edits first, then Lr changes?  I want the simplest, cleanest, logical, least amount of confusion when working on images for an album.  Having 2 or 3 versions of the same image can lead to confusion.  Some of our images will not be edited in PS, others will.
No, you certainly want to edit photos in LR first, and then if necessary send them to PS for additional edits that are not available in LR.
I'm still not clear about "eliminate any confusion". What confusion? As I said, the photos that have been edited by PS will have the word "edit" in the file name, while the photos that have not been sent to Photoshop will not have "edit" in the file name. Also, when you send a file to PS, you can ask LR to stack the PS edited version with the version that has not been sent to PS, thus keeping the pair side-by-side in the Library module.
My second question is exporting out jpegs without losing any resolution - basically copying the files to another folder for example "edited album images" folder and keeping them in the lr database.  Is there a way to do this through Lr?  When I chose "export" and "original" lr edits did not carry through.
So in your first message, you spoke of file size, and now you speak of resolution. These are not the same. So which is it? To maintain the resolution, you uncheck the box that says "Resize to Fit".
I don't understand why you want to copy files to some other folder, Lightroom provides collections and keywords and plenty of other tools to allow you to organize and identify these photos for whatever purpose you want. So you would use these tools to achieve the organization of your original photos or the Photoshop edited versions of the photos. Without a clear justifcation, I would say that in most cases there is not a need to achieve organization of exported photos. Furthermore there is no "copy" command in Lightroom (except at import which we don't seem to be talking about).
Reading between the lines, it sounds like you want to export to save your edits and then maintain some organization of your edited photos? Is that  correct? As I said, there is no need to do this (nor is it an effective way to proceed). You perform the organization of your photos in Lightroom, no need to export simply to organize. Exporting is performed when the photo is needed outside of Lightroom for some non-Lightroom purpose (e.g. e-mail, web, print, use in some other program).

Similar Messages

  • Exporting from Lightroom to Photoshop and back to Lightroom shows different results in Lightroom than in Photoshop

    I has set the color space to ProPhoto RGB in both Lightroom and Photoshop. I have also calibrated my monitor.
    But when I export a photo from Lightroom to Photoshop and edit it there before saving it, the photo in Lightroom is very different than what the Photoshop edit shows.
    Photoshop is to the left, Lightroom to the right.

    Ask in the LR/ PS forums and provide details about your system, your files, your develop settings, other stuff. You need to be much more specific.
    Mylenium

  • Lightroom to Photoshop and back question

    When I export a photo from Lightroom into Photoshop, I make my edits, and then I select save.  In Photoshop the photo changes to a psd file as it should.  But when I go back into Lightroom, the photo does not appear in the original folder it was sent from.  It appears in a new folder that I did not create.  When I try to "move" the picture from this new folder back to it's original folder it says that the file already exists in the original folder, but there is NO photoshop edited picture in that original folder - only in the new folder.  I know I must have a setting wrong, but I have searched and searched and I can't figure out what is wrong.   I can't seem to figure out how to get the photos to go from Lightroom into Photoshop back into Lightroom and end up sitting next to the original picture in the folder it came from.!  Any ideas?  I am using Lightroom 5.4 (everything is up to date) and Photoshop CC (latest version).  I have a Macbook Pro computer.

    Sure.  Here are two images.  The first one is of the original picture in it's original folder.  The second one is of the edited picture in the "new" folder that Photoshop/Lightroom created.  I left the photo info on the picture so you can see it.  Any help would be so much appreciated!
    Thanks!

  • Lightroom to photoshop and back on a Mac

    Hi
    I appear to have an intermitent problem ..........
    When I take on image from a collection in Lightroom into Photoshop, clicking on Lightroom edits, to complete the necessary edits and then click  save the image doesn't appear in the collection.
    The image appears in the original folder but not the collection. This doesn't happen all the time but is time consuming when it does.
    Any ideas?
    Manks in advance
    Steve

    Command Z works for me on Lightroom - always has.
    Edit>Undo is the Menu command

  • Lightroom to Photoshop and Back

    I am working on improving my workflow and have a slant on what appears to be a common question.
    If I make a series of changes to a DNG in Lightroom 4.3, then switch to Photoshop CS6 for additional changes (like removing blemishes and softening an image, I know some of this can be done in LR now, but bear with me). Is it possible to return to Lightroom and change a setting (like white balance) and have the change reflected in Photoshop?
    I recently spent an hour in Photoshop fixing various defects in an image only to discover I did not like the final white balance. I updated the white balance and had to redo all my Photoshop tweeks.
    Any tips for a new user?
    Matthew

    No. I would not adjust the white balance in Photoshop because Lr can do that better.
    Yes, in Photoshop you can do a intricate curve with black-point, white-point, and several neutral points in-between - but how often is that needed?
    Apart from images that I edit in Photoshop because I want to do layers, and other things that Lr cannot do (for instance that intricate curve), I use Photoshop only for the clone tool, the patch tool, and the content-aware fill. Everything else I do in Lr - simply because its easier and also because its non-destructive. In Lr I can always "undo" by going back in the history palette.
    If I want non-destructive in Photoshop I have to use adjustement layers. But that increases file size dramatically.
    Before we had Lr, I was using Photoshop for everything. Now I'm hardly using it because Lr does it easier.
    So, my workflow is this: If an image needs editing in Photoshop, I do it right away - before doing anything in Lr. After that I stay in Lr without returning to Photoshop.

  • Problem: Lightroom to Elements and back

    I can get an image from Lightroom 3 to Photoshop Elements 8 (Mac) but I can't seem to get back. Even after saving and closing the image in Elements it is not visible in Lightroom.
    Also, since I just changed printers I have new icc files. I have those in a place Lightroom seems to be able to find them but Elements doesn't see them. I checked around on line and thought I had copied the icc files to the right library for Elements but it still does not see them.
    Thank you.

    Also, what's the source of your view in LR? If it's "Previous Import", you'll not be able to see the TIFF passed back to LR, try "All Photographs".
    Beat

  • File size growth fr Aperture to Photoshop and back. Why?

    When i take a 15Mb file from Aperture to Photoshop, work on it in photoshop them save back into Aperture its grown to about 56MB back in Aperture, BUT why when i open the Adjustments HUD for this new file in Aperture does it make a new copy of the image and make it 150MB size in Aperture.

    This is because Aperture converts the file to a TIFF wrapped as a PSD file to import to photoshop, which gives you the initial size increase. When photoshop saves the file, it is also saving (in the PSD) any layers you have created, so several layers will increase the size of the file several times.
    Nothing wrong with Aperture - just a fact of life when storing native Photoshop files (PSDs) to disk - they're huge!
    Hope that helps.
    Dave.

  • Lightroom to PS and back

    Hi,  After sending a photo to PS from Lightroom 2, editing it, and returning it to Lightroom, I no longer get the
    message in the history panel "edit in external application" and the date of said edit, like I used to get in Lightroom 1.4. 
    I'd really like that back; any thoughts on how I might accomplish it?  Thanks!

    I didn't realize it was gone, but a quick test shows there's no indication as you mention.
    If you're still on v 2.0, you probably should update to 2.3 for other reasons. Just d/l from the Adobe site, and install- it's a complete version, not a patch or updater.

  • Edit in Photoshop and back to LR Pic Much Lighter

    Strange.
    Did some work on an image in LR and then more as edit in PS.
    When the file came back to LR it was lighter that it started.
    When I check that file by just going to explorer file folder and opened in PS it looked good, just not in LR.
    What is going on?

    There are several possible causes for this. One is that you have "apply auto tone adjustments" checked in your preferences->presets dialog. Turn it off. While you're there, consider also clicking "reset all Default Develop settings". Also check you're not applying any presets to the images. For images that this already happened to, hit the reset button in the Develop panel or in the quick develop section in Library.

  • Bringing pdf from InDesign Photoshop and back to InDesign leaves image and text extremely blurry

    I'm running CS4 on a Macbook Pro, OS X.
    I created a booklet in InDesign, and I want to display it as though the booklet had been photographed from above. For multiple reasons, taking pictures of the actual booklet didn't work, so I used pictures of a blank booklet.
    I saved the files in InDesign as pdf, then placed them on the photoshop file of the blank booklet. I changed the layer display from regular to "Multiply" so the shadowing on the booklet pages shows through. They look great in Photoshop-- the images are still vectors, from InDesign, and the files are at 300 ppi, at the exact dimensions for print.
    I save them from Photoshop as pdf, and place the finished pdf in InDesign to lay out for display. However, in InDesign, the images are extremely pixellated and distorted-- for example, letters are missing from words, hairlines have strange gaps that are not in the original file, and the overall look is very poor.
    I have tried saving as jpg, psd, pdf, eps, tiff, flattened tiff-- you name it. I cannot figure out why the file looks bad in InDesign.
    May be relevant: The file is a composite-- I photoshopped multiple spreads of the blank booklet, placed, and used layer masks to make them look as though they were laying on the same surface and had been photographed together. These layers are flattened, and the placed files are each in their own layer.

    Hi, I can't follow your post...I suggest taking a screenshot in photoshop of your image detail at 100% actual pixels, along with your layers pallet:
    I save them from Photoshop as pdf, and place the finished pdf in InDesign to lay out for display. However, in InDesign, the images are extremely pixellated and distorted-- for example, letters are missing from words, hairlines have strange gaps that are not in the original file, and the overall look is very poor.
    what compression settings are you selecting in photoshop> save> Ps PDF (screen shots are very usefull here to make your point)?

  • Lightroom to bridge and back

    After making light-room adjustments, will those adjustments appear in Bridge? I think not, but wish so. Further, how about reverse workflow, bridge adjustments appear in LR?

    OK I had a look and now this sounds foggy:
    "Read metadata from file"
    Is this an always setting, or per selected file. And then, if you further work the file in LR, will that add to the previous settings from bridge, which I want it to. Then it looks like you have to make the other selection in the metadata menu: "Save meta data to file" . I just want to make changes wherever I am, LR or bridge, and have them stick wherever I make them. And further yet, with these xmp data changes, will the sliders settings and stuff translate between programs, or will just the corrected appearance of the image appear? (meaning if clarity is set to "50" in bridge, will it show "50" in LR,or just show the effect?)
    Thanks for your help !

  • Problems with image names when exporting - images that have come back into lightroom from photoshop

    Can anyone help ? When I need to take an image from lightroom into photoshop then back into lightroom and then I export that image, the original file number disappears and is replaced by dashes. Does anyone know how to solve this ?
    Thanks !

    The appearance of dashes usually suggests some kind of pre-set e.g.
    Wedding-20150106-0001.jpg
    The only suggestion I can make is that you check to ensure you are using the correct parameters in the templates manager.
    Photoshop Lightroom Reference Guide | Create Your Own Custom Filename Presets | Peachpit

  • Aperture, Photoshop, and Apple's possible direction for Image Editing

    All,
    After using Aperture now for several days, and reading many different forum topics, in particular this one which speaks of desired enhancements to Aperture:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=253594&tstart=0
    there is one thing that really sticks out on my mind. While all of us photographers have slightly different specifics to our workflow, in general they are very similar. And with respect to Aperture, there is one huge area where most of us seem to be hitting the brick wall: image adjustments, and by extension, image file management. Let me explain what I mean.
    I think it is a fair generalization to say that the vast majority of serious digital photographers are using Photoshop (or some other image editing app, but I'm just going to refer to Photoshop for convenience) for post-processing of some kind. In using Aperture, and figuring out how to fit it into workflow, we've got this situation of how to move from organization and image library management to the full gamut of image adjusting functionality (photoshop) and back again to library management. The need to use photoshop then exposes the issue of how files are stored on the filesystem, etc. Stay with me here...
    I have found myself thinking, and it is pretty clearly demonstrated in the forum topic mentioned above where folks are making suggestions for improvements to Aperture, that there's this barrel people are over in knowing whether Photoshop and Aperture should live in the workflow together, or whether Aperture should (or is intended to) replace Photoshop in the workflow. This got me to thinking about the fundamental question -- what is the intent, i.e. the vision for Aperture? Is it meant to replace Photoshop, or restated, is Aperture meant to be the app in which all image adjustments are to be made, OR is Aperture meant to just ease workflow, and is it intended not to be the primary app for image adjustments, but rather integrate with the primary image adjustment app?
    The reason I bring this up is that the answer to this question makes all the difference in what enhancement requests and what people should expect from Aperture now, and in future versions. If Aperture is the primary place for image adjustment, then its obvious that there are some very significant additions that need to take place to Aperture, and likewise, the issue of putting images on the filesystem becomes much less important. However, if Aperture is a workflow-easer, then such image adjustment improvements are minimally important if at all, and filesystem / Photoshop / PSD file integration becomes paramount.
    I know what Aperture does, what features it provides, etc. But I can't help but realize that its not really that clear (or I just don't understand yet) what the full scope of Aperture now and in the future is intended to be, and the forum topics are pretty decent documentation of the fact that the user base at this point is fairly cloudy on that too.
    I can't help thinking that in the midst of the Apple pro line of tools, where we have tools that edit: video, audio, DVD creation, text effects, and now digital photography workflow, that there's one glaring hole: static image editing, i.e. a direct Photoshop competitor. I went through the Aperture video demos before Aperture shipped, and watched these photo pros talk incessantly about how "now there's an app that addresses how I work -- Aperture". That's great, but Apple has to know the role that Photoshop plays in present photography workflow -- for those pros too. So I'm sitting here thinking to myself, why would Apple roll out such a product with some clear workflow hurdles to common Photoshop usage.
    Ok, here's the punchline: does anyone else here have a sneaking suspicion that Apple is not to far off from releasing their own image editing application that's a direct Photoshop competitor? I mean come on, Final Cut Pro, Motion, Sountrack, and by extension of the CEO to Pixar, Renderman. How can you not have a static image adjustment application entering the scene at some point?
    I'm curious what others think. I'm just trying to make sense of how to fit the neat stuff I see in Aperture into a workflow that doesn't play very nicely with Aperture at some points (because I'm using Photoshop).
    Brad
    Powerbook G4-1.33GHz-17" / Powermac G4-1.4GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.2)   PB: 1GB RAM, Radeon 9600-64MB / PM: 1.25GB RAM, Radeon 9000Pro-128MB

    So Apple adds curves adjustments,
    we'll need noise reduction, greater sharpening
    capability, etc., etc., and then when we have all
    those features, surely we'll need masking and select
    capability to perform those adjustments selectively,
    etc. Where does it end?
    Actually that could be a good cut-off point - add a few more/better 'global' adjustments but leave all mask, selection and layer based tasks to external editors. Personally, I used to swear by curves, but haven't really touched them in PS for a year since shooting more RAW and learning how to use the shadow/highlight adjustment properly. Sometimes for overall colour for JPEGs, but that bit can be done just as well in levels.
    My workflow isn't particularly typical, but here goes.
    Type of photography - stitched panoramas as a professional, plus general snapshots/nature/landscape as hobby. Single user with no network storage.
    Currently I use a very organised folder structure in the Finder, along with aliases in DragThing docks for easy access to final stitched files, all with their own unique ID. RAW conversions are done in ACR/PSCS2, or Bibble if I'm in a hurry on the laptop. About 40% of the panos are shot in RAW, 40% are bracketed JPEG and the remaining 20% are 'single' JPEG. The panoramas go through quite a lot of post-processing in PS using a whole series of actions and AppleScripts.
    I'm expecting my workflow to look something like this:
    1) Download directly into Aperture, possibly with added help from Automator/Applescript when it comes to proper date-based names.
    2) Divide download into a new album for each panorama.
    2a) If it is a people pano there will be quite a lot of duplicate shots for each panohead position - make a stack for each position and choose picks - this bit will speed things up enormously by itself. Reorder stacks to fit correct order of images going around the scene.
    3) Export to TIFF (sometimes JPEG) and stitch using PTMac (sometimes Realviz Stitcher). Oh, and any people who think Aperture is limited, buggy and bad value should go and look at Stitcher - it costs the same, has a far more limited feature set, is on version 5 and by comparison makes Aperture look bug-free.
    4) Bring stitched panorama into Photoshop to adjust seams through layers if needed, flatten, final tone adjustments (usually using shadow/highlight), possibly some colour tweaks, sharpen. For bracketed shots I will blend together the three exposures at this point using a custom action - this kind of thing is unlikely ever to make it to Aperture.
    5) Bring final print-ready file into Aperture for cataloguing/backup.
    5a) If file is too big for Aperture, make a smaller version for cataloguing and store original file in Finder. This gives me a good file for 90% of purposes, with the huge file available with a bit more work.
    Too big? I've found that Aperture gets sluggish with files over 18-20,000 pixels wide, and chokes totally somewhere between 25,000 and 32,000 pixels wide - 'image format unsupported'.
    To summarise - organise and convert in Aperture, stitch in specialist software, do PS-specific stuff then bring final image back in to join the source images.
    Ian

  • When transferring photos from lightroom to photoshop my options of open such as smart object, merging into HDR are grayed out?

    i am attempting to move raw files from lightroom to photoshop and my options are grayed out? mainly i am attempting to merge to HDR. thanks in advance

    Here a solution, is simple and, in my set-up, works very well.
    5. Re: Automatic updates wont update to Camera Raw 8.5
    Ashutosh.Nigam Jun 23, 2014 11:23 PM (in response to MB-Photography)
    Please follow the below mentioned steps to resolve the issue:
    Quit and Relaunch CC app
            http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/creative-cloud-connection-faq.html#id_10491
    Open the Adobe Creative Cloud application.
    Mac OS: Go to the Applications folder and open the Adobe Creative Cloud alias.
    Windows 7: Go to Start > All Programs > Adobe Creative Cloud
    Windows 8: Open the Adobe Creative Cloud application from the Start Screen.
    Click the Apps tab in the Adobe Creative Cloud applications.
    Click on All Apps, then Previous Version
    Your installed CC Product would be listed, Click on Install Drop-down and then select the CC 2014 to install.
    After Successful Installation, Update your Product
    Let me know if you are still not able to Update ACR.
    Regards,
    Ashutosh
    Automatic updates wont update to Camera Raw 8.5

  • Is it possible to edit a DNG file in Photoshop and get back to Lightroom?

    Hi,
    The question title probably doesn't explain much what I'm looking for...
    I shot in RAW and then converted to DNG, I like DNG and I can't understand what so many people have against it, anyway that's not the point...
    I know have the DNG as my digital negative instead of the original RAW file and I start to do some editing in Lightroom. But then I realized that Lightroom is not enough for something I want to do. For instance, just today I had this picture I needed to remove some people and I had to use heal/clone but as you know, Lightroom's clone and heal features are not as flexible as Photoshop ones.
    So now I needed to go into Photoshop, fix the photo and get back to Lightroom and continue my editing. However, I couldn't find a way to do it how I wanted to do... What I did was open the original (unedited) DNG in Photoshop, Adobe Camera Raw pops up and I ignore it, remove the people from the photo and save as TIFF. Then, back in Lightroom I open the new edited TIFF and copy Lightroom's settings from one photo (the DNG) to the other (the edited TIFF).
    This workflow sucks and I know there are some options in Lightroom to automate it, but still, I don't think it would solve my problem. At least I couldn't find a way to do it...
    What I wanted to do instead was to indeed remove that people from the photo with Photoshop but keep those changes in DNG. But take a note here that those changes could very much be destructive, I'm not talking about ACR or Lightroom's non-destructive editing, the removed people would be gone forever unless I draw some new ones. I really wanted to edit and save some changes on the DNG in Photoshop and keep editing the DNG in Lightroom without using a TIFF in between, do everything in the DNG.
    Is this possible or not at all?

    Ricardo.Amaral wrote:
    What I wanted to do instead was to indeed remove that people from the photo with Photoshop but keep those changes in DNG.
    sorry, no can do...ain't gonna happen.
    What you've done is hit the wall on is the basic difference between lite duty spot healing and photo level tone and color correction (Lightroom and Camera Raw) and heavy duty pixel retouching in Photoshop.
    When you need to substantially manipulate the "pixels" you need Photoshop and you'll be forced to render the raw file into a TIFF or PSD file either through Camera Raw or more better, via Lightroom.
    You can do the basic tone and color correction directly in Lightroom and edit in Photoshop from Lightroom. But you will NEED to create and save out a "rendered" image that is no longer raw...then retouch to your heart's desire, save it and it'll be available in Lightroom along side your original raw if you choose.
    But no, there's no way to open a raw in Photoshop, manipulate the heck out of it with massive retouching then save that back out as a raw file...ain't gonna happen.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Adding object to collection outside of unit of work?

    Hi, Tried to find the answer in this forum but difficult to know what keywords to use...anyway What I am trying to do is so simple I can only believe I am missing the point somewhat ;-) I have an object Licence that has a Set of LicenceHolders. I hav

  • Footnotes and line spacing

    Hi, Does anyone know why, when I create a footnote, the line following is placed in an improbable and non-correctible space below - perhaps as much as a whole line? If anyone does know, do they also know how to correct this globally throughout the do

  • I can't remove third party apps from my macbook pro.

    I have installed some third party apps and now want to delete them. The apps are: MorphVOX, YTD, and Paintbrush. I have tried to drag and drop but unable to do. Please help me. I have macbook pro OS X 10.9.4

  • Problems with checkout SHD0 due to transport orders.

    Hi experts; I have created a variant of checkout ME21N via SHD0 on development environment. In this variant I blanked the imputation column because I put a value. Then I set the purchase document type. I've attached this variant ZME21N transaction. A

  • How to convert mp3 to m4r ringtone ?

    hi all i have just purchased a small MP3 file to use as a ring tone, but, to be be able to use it on my iPhone i need to convert it to a m4r file is it easy to do this WITHOUT purchasing special software ? although, having just said WITHOUT purchasin