Load Balancing on RV320

Hi,
My Cisco RV320 router are not working like I want ...
I get two ISP in France, same tech. specs., sames bandwidth, but 2 differents way to connect.
The first WAN is connected in PPPoE with a ADSL2+ Modem
The second WAN is connected in Static IP with a modem/router
I set the load balancing Auto. but it seem that the WAN2 is more used than the WAN1...
For example, I upload a big documents, like a video on youtube, witch take a long time and need the max Bandwidth. While I'm going to download a file with an internal software, who use a different port by the way. The most of the time, it only use the WAN2 ... so my download is flanged ! It only donwload @~450KB/S when it can max @ ~1,8MO/S, and the WAN1 is not blinking ... And sometimes the balancing is good ... I can't understand the RV320 logic ? But Maybe is there a bug ? Maybe I get a bad configuration ?
Have a clue ?
Please help me !

So, you can hear the phone ringing and answer it? which means that SIP pakets are coming through WAN to LAN and well redirected to the phone IP, but you cannot hear after that, which means that there could be a problem with the RTP packets.
If you have problem only with the incoming calls and not the outgoing, than try enable/disable SIP ALG (Firewall). If that doesn't fix the issue, try to allow (or even forward) from WAN to LAN RDP - UDP ports 16384-32767 to the phone IP.
Regards,
Kremena

Similar Messages

Cisco RV320 Load balance

Dear all,
I have 2 ADSL routers (4MB and 2MB). Can anyone advice me to can I use the RV320 for load balancing (4+2=6MB)?. Also, please advice me how the other 2 ADSL router should be setup to support for this load balancing?
Thank you,

Hello phoutsavong,
To learn more about load balancing and how to configure the WAN Interface on the RV320, you can refer to the article, Dual WAN Configuration on RV320 and RV325 VPN Router Series. This article will help you configure the WAN Interface. To start, select Load Balance in the Router configuration Utility.
I hope this helps and if you have any additional questions please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Kevin Yen

RV320 - Dual WAN - Load Balance Problem

Hi all,
I've just bought a RV320 Dual WAN router an try to get it running. My network setup looks lice the picture attached.
I have 2 WAN Connections:
- Router 1 (16Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - no public WAN IP
- Router 2 (3 Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - Fixed public IP
Router 1 ist connected to WAN1 and router 2 to WAN2 port on the RV320.
I have enabled load balancing mode.
Qustions:
1.
I want WAN1 to be the primary line to be used until capacity reached.
Currently for some reason I don't understand the cisco always uses WAN2.
That's not good as all browsing and downloading is limited to 3mbit.
When I switch to "fail-over" mode and set primry live to WAN1 that works, but WAN2 is not kept alive.
2.
I am using VOIP and need to route all VOIP traffic to WAN2 interface.
The best would be to tell the router IP 192.168.177.9 (voip phone) should use WAN2. So far I didn't figure out how to do that.
Can I put VOIP into one VLAN group and allocated VLAN to one specific WAN interface?
Brgds

So, you can hear the phone ringing and answer it? which means that SIP pakets are coming through WAN to LAN and well redirected to the phone IP, but you cannot hear after that, which means that there could be a problem with the RTP packets.
If you have problem only with the incoming calls and not the outgoing, than try enable/disable SIP ALG (Firewall). If that doesn't fix the issue, try to allow (or even forward) from WAN to LAN RDP - UDP ports 16384-32767 to the phone IP.
Regards,
Kremena

RV320, load balancing problem

Hi,
How do I force the router to use WAN1 till it's saturated, and ther switch to WAN2 when needed. I've already configured the bandwidth correctly for each WAN, but it seems that some clients use WAN1, others use WAN2, disregarding the fact that they should use WAN1 as primary and the bandwidth it's not saturated by any other client.

Only from load balancing point of view cluster is not really needed.
apart from session replication and failover capabilities, few more benefits are there with clustering only if you are using a web server also.
Stuck threads can be due to lot's of problems like application issues, load issues etc, So first make sure you are getting stuck thread on both servers or only on one, if on one, then in this case your load balancing not working properly and sending more load to that server, and if you are getting stuck threads on both then try to add one more managed server.
Regards
Mukesh Negi
http://weblogicserveradministration.blogspot.com

Error while selecting Load Balancing in JCO creation

While creating JCO i am facing this error.It is working fine with Single server connection,but when i chose Load balancing i error comes out.Please tell me the solution.
I have read couples of forum mentioned you need to start both Portal and ECC.
For you information my Portal and Java are both on diffrrent Box.
com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (102) RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: Connect to message server host failed Connect_PM TYPE=B MSHOST=olameccpdvr GROUP=PUBLIC R3NAME=DVR MSSERV=sapmsDVR PCS=1 LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode ERROR service 'sapmsDVR' unknown TIME Thu Feb 24 12:19:54 201 RELEASE 701 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 38 RC -3 MODULE nixxhsl.cpp LINE 776 DETAIL NiHsLGetServNo: service name cached as unknown COUNTER 5

Is your backend system configured correctly in your SLD ?
Go to transaction SMMS on your backend system that your are connecting to. Click on Goto=>Parameters=>Display. Look for "server port" value.
This should give you the TCP/IP port for your message server. It could be 3600 or 3601 (36NN - where NN is the instance number).
In your services file, if you made the entry at the end of the file, press Enter (Return) after your entry.
Try restarting your server after making the above changes.
- Shanti

Error in creation of JCO with Load balancing server

Hi,
We are using a ABAP user base for our WEBAS server 6.40 (with ABAP+JAVA). i have created a Public group in concerned ECC 5.0 system. I have already configured SLD, and then i maintain data supplier bridge in SLD and run RZ70 in ECC 5.0 system to load system information.. i can see details in SLD ..
now i am trying to create JCO connections .. here i am unable to create JCO with load balancing option.. i get
com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (102) RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: Connect to message server host failed Connect_PM TYPE=B MSHOST=<servername> GROUP=PUBLIC R3NAME=SID MSSERV=sapms<SID> PCS=1 ERROR service 'sapms<SID>' unknown TIME Fri Jun 16 12:41:20 2006 RELEASE 640 COMPONENT NI (network interface) VERSION 37 RC -3 MODULE ninti.c LINE 505 DETAIL NiPGetServByName2: service 'sapms<SID>' not found SYSTEM CALL getservbyname_r COUNTER 1
i am able to create single server JCO, but it fails in load balancing.. is there anything i have missed out in settings...
Thanks and regards,
Sudhir

Thanks, Bogdan Rokosa
I have the same problem,and solved it following the steps provided by Bogdan Rokosa :
you must insert an entry for your R3 system
(like: sapms<SID> 3600/tcp)
in services file
(C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\services) on Java WAS.
I test the Jco successful without restart J2EE Engine.

ISE 1.2 - Multiple NICs/Load Balancing for DHCP Probe

Hello guys
Just prepping an ISE 1.2 patch 8 setup in our organization. I am going for the virtual appliances with multiple NICs. It will be a distributed deployment with 4 x PSNs behind a load balancer and there is no requirement for wireless or guest user at the moment. I've got 2 points I will like to get some guidance on:
Our DC has a dedicated mgmt network and I plan to IP the gig0 interface of the PANs, MNTs and PSNs from this subnet. All device admin, clustering, config replication, etc will be over this interface. However, RADIUS/probe/other user traffic to the ISE PSNs will be over the gig1 interface which will be addressed from another L3 network. Is this a supported configuration in ISE?
I intend to use the DHCP probe as part of device profiling and will ideally like to have just an additional ip helper to add to our switch SVI config. Also, it will appear that WLCs can only be configured for 2 DHCP servers for a given network so another consideration for when we bringing our WLAN in scope. We however use ACE load balancers within our DC and from what I have read, they do not support DHCP load balancing. Are there any workarounds to using the DHCP probe with multiple PSNs without having to add each node as an ip helper/DHCP server on the NADs?
Thanks in advance
Sayre

Hello Sayre-
For Question #1:
Management is restricted to GigabitEthernet 0 and that cannot be changed so you should be good there
You can configure Radius and Profiling to be enabled on other interfaces
Even though you are not using guest services yet, you can dedicate an interface just for that. As a result, you can separate guest traffic completely from your production network
Take a look at this link for more info:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_app_c-ports.html
For Question #2
If you are using a Cisco WLC and running code 7.4 and newer you don't need to mess with the IP helper configurations.
The controller can be configured to act as a collector for client profiling and interact with the DHCP thread along with the RADIUS accounting task that is running on the controller. The controller receives a copy of the DHCP request packet sent from the DHCP thread and parses the DHCP packet for two options:
–Option 12—HostName of the client
–Option 60—The Vendor Class Identifier
After this information is gathered from the DHCP_REQUEST packet, a message is formed by the controller with these option fields and is sent to the RADIUS accounting thread, which is in turn transmitted to the ISE in the form of an interim accounting message.
Both DHCP and HTTP profiling settings are located under the "Advanced" configuration tab in the WLC
On the other hand, you can also use Anycast for profiling. You can check out some of Cisco Live's sessions for more info on that. Here is one that is from a couple of years (There are more recent ones that are available as well):
http://www.alcatron.net/Cisco%20Live%202013%20Melbourne/Cisco%20Live%20Content/Security/BRKSEC-3040%20%20Advanced%20ISE%20and%20Secure%20Access%20Deployment.pdf
I hope this helps!
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

SAP GLM Print Request - Load Balancing of WWI server

Hi GLM Experts,
I am using new GLM + module that generates labels based on Print Requests. I am unable to understand how I can load balance the WWI services when there are multiple label printing requests.
In GLM + we associate a WWI to a Print Station and which can then be associated with a printer. So in the configuration we are tying up a printer a WWI.
Also during label printing, if the scenario uses print request module, then the use need to select a print station and printer. What happens if the WWI related to the print station is down?
For example I have two services in WWI server GENPC1 and GENPC2. I created WWII and WWI2 as two print stations. I will associate my printer PRNWWI to both the print stations WWI1 and WWI2.
During label printing if the user picks and WWI1 and Printer PDNWWI and if the GENPC1 WWI server assocaited with print status WWI1 is busy and down I want WWI GENPC2 to generate the label?
How to setup the above load balancing or fall back? Please let me know.
Thanks
Pugal

Dear Pugal
we are not using GLM + and I am not sure about the technqiue used there to handle load balancing. Regarding general WWI setup I assume you know this Note: EH&amp;S: Availability and performance of WWI and Expert servers
On the top there is a further SAP Note abvailable which might be of interest. This is referenced here:
http://de.scribd.com/doc/191576739/011000358700000861002013-e
May be check OSS note: 1958655; OSS Note 1155294 is more related to normal WWI stuff; but may be check it as well. May be 1934253 might help better
May be this might help.
C.B.
PS: may be check as well: consolut - EHS_MD_140_01 - EH&amp;S-Management-Server einrichten
The load balancing of synchron WWi servers is donein the "RFC" layer, therefore you have no inffluence here, for asynchron WWI servers you can do a lot to manage the WWI load balancing by using "exits" etc.

APEX SSO and Load balancing: Could not determine workspace for application

We had a single HTTP Server serving APEX in a 10.2.0.2 database configured with SSO to be used by the developers. APEX has been registered as a partner application and the login url has been CA Siteminder protected so that the SM_USER details are forwarded in the header for the application to use for authorization. Everything is fine so far.
Now we have added a HTTP Server on another host and have it all set up for APEX and its pointing to the same database. APEX_ADMIN access works as normal, but applications previously using SSO now get the following error after entering the URL.
Expecting p_company or wwv_flow_company cookie to contain security group id of application owner.
Error ERR-7620 Could not determine workspace for application ().
Using HTTP Watch I find that the application is not even trying to redirect to the login page.
What is wrong here?

APEX has been registered as a partner application as described in
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/howtos/sso_partner_app.html
In the meantime I found metalink document 368746.1 which describes the cause of this problem. Please read carefully what I wrote, it all works when the the new APEX web server is turned off in the server farm on the load balancer and directed through the original web server. When running regapp.sql the hostname in the listener token was using the virtual hostname. This works fine if the request comes from the original APEX server which proofs that there is nothing wrong with the installation and set up of SSO. When directing the request to the new APEX web server the APEX_ADMIN page still works only existing work spaces using SSO don't seems to work anymore resulting in a error as described in the subject.
As for metalink document 368746.1 naming the causes of this error:
- there are no duplicate entries in WWSEC_ENABLER_CONFIG_INFO$
-LISTENER_TOKEN clearly works for requests coming from the first web server
-theoretically the web server listener port could be changed from 7777, but port 80 needs to be maintained here as production is mimiced as far down as possible.
Is there some cache table which can be cleared? How is it that the flows schema (apex engine) can not find the work space when the request comes from a new web server which can however access the APEX_ADMIN pages.
anyone?

SSO with SAP R/3 with load balancing as backend over the Web AS

Hi,
we have Netweaver 2004 at this time and we have to connect the portal to a BSP application in a load balancing environment.
We set user mapping for the user and set the connection type from SAPLOGONTICKET to UIDPW. This is running for a test environment with only one R/3 system without load balancing.
Does anyone know the setting parameters for a load balancing environment (ok, the message server and...?).
Thank you.
Best regards
Patrizia

Hi all,
run into the same problem. Setting up a mapping with UIDPW in a non load balanced WEB-AS enviroment for BSP or Webdynpro for ABAP works fine. But if I go to set it up in a balanced system I can see the following behavior. The http request is send to the messageserver. This request enclosed my mapped user and password. The messageserver responds with an HTTP 301 wich contains one of my applicationservers, so far so good. The client sends a new request to the mentioned applicationserver but this time without the UIDPW. So the user will not be logged in.
I was wondering if my backend have to issue logonticket too, cause today it only accept tickets from the portal.
Is this is a bug or a feature?
Regards,
Bernd

How to change the OraSSO login link in webcache/load balance

Hi
we have 10gAsR1 installed as a Portal instance. We have 6-server
load balancer => webcache as loadbalancer (listening port 80)
Wb ch1 and wb ch2 => webcache (listening port 7777)
portal1 and portal2 => Portal listening 7778
infra =>Infrastruture with repository Portal/Oracle SSO (listening 7777)
This set up is working fine for our intranet setup, now we need to open this for couple of external clients. Well initially we need to open on the load balancer server on port 80 for external team to access, it works fine when we make it publc access.
Now when we need to make it SSO (siteminder) enables, when users click on login link it first goes oracle sso then it internally redirects the page to site minder sso.
Well, I have noted that the sso server details are mentioned in global setting sso/oid details. Since we need to open this for external client we have to add a DNS entry for this so that we can allow its access over firewall..
Now I have made DNS name change at my infrserver level, now I need to update the change at the load balancer server (where wheb chache is running).
Any one know how to chang the URL at load balancer.
I am struck at this point please suggest how should i proceed..
Thanks,

Extract from Personalization Guide - Page Footer - Personalization Considerations
* If you wish to personalize the URL that points to the Privacy Statement for a page that displays a standard Copyright and Privacy (that is, its Auto Footer property is set to true), set the Scope to OA Footer, in the Choose Personalization Context page of the Personalization UI.
* If you wish to personalize the URL that points to the Privacy Statement for a page that displays a custom Copyright and Privacy (that is, its Auto Footer property is set to false), set the Scope to Page in the Choose Personalization Context page of the Personalization UI. In the following Page Hierarchy Personalization page , identify and personalize the Privacy page element.

DS to BW load balancing

Dear all,
I have a doubt regarding load balancing in PRD. Our team is loading data through DS 12.2.2.3 to SAP BW Master / transaction Infosources.
SAP BW system has five Application Servers / instances to balance the load. BW target data store is configured to connect to the Central Instance of SAP BW.
Since we are connected to the Central instance / application server of BW system from DS, will BW system be able to balance the load across multiple instances?
Since BW Server has multiple instances to balance the load, is there any way we can utilise these BW multiple instances from Data Services?
Can you share your thoughts on this? Appreciate your responses.
Regards,
Suneer.

Hi Suneer,
There are several ways how DS and BW can interact, so it might depend on what scenario you are using.
I can think of the following scenario's:
1. A DS job is executed from admin console and loads into a BW target datasource.
This should use any available server, according to load balancing settings. It is not possible to force the process to use a specific server.
2. A process chain starts an infopackage, which in turn starts a DS job
BW will use the server chosen at the time of scheduling, if everything is configured correctly and scheduled correctly it will use any avaialble server conform load balancing settings. You can set this to run on a specific server (but I would only recommend this in very special circumstances).
3. DS triggers a process chain
Again, BW will use the settings on the process chain.
4. BW runs an execution command, which starts a DS job
Well, this is not a relevant scenario as it does not update anything on BW - unless the execution command then runs a job which loads data into BW, which is described in scenario 1.
I hope this makes sense. Let me know if you have any other scenario's or concerns.
Can I just ask why you are concerned about this load balancing? I have not have load balancing problems with DS/BW but I have had plenty of problems around concurrent use of the RFC connection between DS/BW. 'Multithreading' was not supported until 12.2.3.2 and you mentioned you run on 12.2.2.3, so potentially this is a problem for you.
Jan.

Does ADFS work with SharePoint 2013 with WFEs SSL-offloaded to a F5 load balancer?

Currently we are implementing a SharePoint 2013 Production environment with 2 WFEs load-balanced by F5. SSL is offloaded to F5 and is currently working fine with Integrated Windows Authentication with NTLM. We would like to implement ADFS 3.0
later for Single Sign-on, and we are wondering if ADFS supports SSL offload.
Do we need to bind the certificate to the WFEs as well to use ADFS?
Thank you!

Just got it confirmed that ADFS supports SSL offload. There is no direct communication between SharePoint and ADFS server during the authentication process. It is always the browser that's talking to ADFS server. We just need to do the following:
Configure SharePoint URLs in ADFS as replying parties with https.
Configure AAM in SharePoint to make sure internal URL is http and public URL is https.

Site not accessible from the Load balanced web front end server - sharepoint 2010

I have a production environment with 2 WFE's(sp-wfe1 & sp-wfe2), 2 APP's and 2 SQL clustered VM's.
2 WFE's are load balanced using hardware load balancer.
An A-Record(PORTAL) is created in DNS for the virtual IP of the load balancer which points to the 2 WFE's.
A web application is created on the WFE's on port 80.
alternative access mapping is configured and the load balanced record "http://PORTAL" is used under the default zone.
Under IIS I have edited the bindings for the sharepoint site at port 80 and added the HOSTNAME as PORTAL.
Result: The site is accessible from outside the server and works fine.
ISSUE: The site is not accessible within the WFE's(sp-wfe1 & sp-wfe2).
When I browse the site from the WFE's server it ask for the credentials and when I enter the credentials and click OK it ask the credentials again and again and in the end displays a blank page.
Kindly help me in this issue because I am clueless and couldn't find anything helpful on the internet.
Regards,
Mudassar
MADDY-DEV Forum answers from Microsoft Forum

Loop back check.
http://www.harbar.net/archive/2009/07/02/disableloopbackcheck-amp-sharepoint-what-every-admin-and-developer-should-know.aspx

Lync Server Front End 2 Hardware Load Balancer IP

I currently have the following Setup.
I only have 1 Hardware Load Balanced IP for my Front End Pool.
After running the Lync Planning Tool it actually states that i need 2 Hardware Load Balanced IP, 1 for internal and 1 for external.
My question would be would i be able to configure for mobility and external access with just using 1 Hardware Load Balanced IP?
Because i seem to have problem with connecting to the front end server based on the following scenario.
Without Reverse Proxy Mapping (port 80/443 internet to port 80/443 reverse proxy to port 80/443 lyncpool frontend)
Internal Access (No Issue)
Lync Mobile 2013 App (Can Connect and chat but intermittent connection) *gets disconnected if i access video/audio
Lync Client 2013 Externally (Cannot Connect to Server)
https://meet.domain.com (working)
With Reverse Proxy Mapping (Port 80/443 internet to port 8080/4443 reverse proxy to port 8080/4443 lyncpool frontend)
Internal Access (No Issue)
Lync Mobile 2013 App (Cannot connect)
Lync Client 2013 Externally (Cannot connect)
https://meet.domain.com (Not working)
Would i actually need to have a additional front end pool IP for external access? or can i maintain it as it is?
I do not understand why without the mapping it can work whereas if i do the mapping according to technet article it won't work.
Everything is running windows server 2012 R2 and Lync 2013, Loadbalancer / Reverse Proxy is the same F5 Appliance
Any assistance on this is greatly appreciated.

Hi Greg,
I have been making use of it (https://testconnectivity.microsoft.com/) to test my autodiscover and remote
access.
Like i mentioned it is weird that without doing port mapping from 80/443 to 8080/4443 i was able to pass
the autodiscovery and all but once i changed to the proper steps to do port mapping it stopped working.
and im not using TMG but using a F5 Hardware Reverse Proxy which also happen to be my Load Balancing Appliance.
Is there anyone who can help give me more details if i need 2 VIP for the front end ?

Load Balancing on RV320

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for