Logical System in IDOC-XI scenario

Hi,
     I need help to understand few things in IDOC-XI scenario, could any one help me in this regard.
    we use Adapter specific identifiers to map services, we have following type of identifiers 1) Sys.ID & Client No.  2) Logical System. 
my questions are
a) Are we use Logical System in B to B scenario ?
b) Are we use LS in reference to the SAP system or Non SAP system ? if a non SAP system....how a non SAP system send an IDOC and why a non SAP system receive an IDOC ( conversion is possible in XI ) ?
Thanks and Regards
Mahesh.

Hay Kumar,
Logical systems can also be used for SAp sytems wich are not installed yet as a virtuall placeholder.
a) yes. if on of your business is a non sap system or a propritery system that you developed yuo'll ue LS.
b) non SAP system can send and recieve IDOCs. so it's possiable to get an IDOC from a system and turn it into an RFC for SAP or get an IDOC from an SAP system and then turn it into something else for another system.
Have a Good One,
Uri Lifshitz.

Similar Messages

  • Integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario

    Hi,
    Will we configure integration server as logical system in IDoc to file scenario or the RFC destination related to the port will be suffice?
    For which logical system will the outbound partner profile configured?
    Regards,
    Gajendra.

    Hello,
    I feel that the RFC destination linked to the port is the key here.
    Because the scenario (IDoc to File) works in both the cases:
    Case 1: Used the logical system as Integration server
    Case 2: Used the logical system related to the file (third party) in the SLD.
    In both the above cases the RFC destination points to the integration server.
    Is this the case that in the XI scenarios (where IDoc are sent) the logical system name in the partner profile is just dummy and has not much significance??
    It is the port that matters and once the Idoc reaches XI the routing takes place based on the configuration in ID.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Gajendra.

  • Logical system for IDoc acknowledgment?

    Hi,
    HTTP --> XI --> IDOC (with acknowledgment) is my scenario
    whether the inbound and outbound parameters should be configured in the same logical system or in a different one (in transaction we20)
    Thanks,
    RPN

    For IDOC acknowledgement ,go thru this and do the settings :
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    This will help u :
    Configuration Tips for a Business Service/Integration Process to send back ALE audit IDOC

  • IDoc Adapter Logical System Empty

    Hello All,
    For one of our scenarios for Reciver IDoc adapters we are getting the error "Receiver service cannot be converted into an ALE logical system ". On further investigation it seems the logical system stays on editing the Adapter Specific Message attributes option & even after clicking the Compare with SLD Option. Can you please assist us with this issue ? Also sldcheck runs fine but sldapicust gives an error CIM_ERR_FAILED. We recently upgraded our sld and we believe this might be the issue.
    Thanks,
    Kiran

    Hi Debashish & Veera,
    The issue has been resolved. When our SLD was migrated to a newer version 1 month ago back our logical system names got cleared. We did not face this issue until yesturday since the logical system names were still cached with the business system. Yesturday a newer IDoc scenario was imported in production and which caused the business system cache to be refeshed and it started pulling the new empty logical system name causing the scenarios to fail.
    Thanks,
    Kiran

  • Filt to IDoc: cannot convert sender to ALE logical system

    Hi there,
    i have used forum search for my issue, but could not figure out the issue by myself so far.
    I tried to read a file into PI 7.0, map to and IDoc and send IDoc to SAP system. I have the following configuration:
    Sender: SYSTEM_A
    ---Logical System <none>
    Receiver: SYSTEM_B
    ---Logical System: EIECLNT300
    the IDoc i'm sending looks like this (most of them dummy values):
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ORDERS05>
    <IDOC BEGIN="value2">
    ---<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="value2">
    <TABNAM>value2</TABNAM>
    <DIRECT>value2</DIRECT>
    <IDOCTYP>value2</IDOCTYP>
    <MESTYP>value2</MESTYP>
    <SNDPOR>EIECLNT300</SNDPOR>
    <SNDPRT>value2</SNDPRT>
    <SNDPRN>PITCLNT001</SNDPRN>
    <RCVPOR>value2</RCVPOR>
    <RCVPRN>EIECLNT300</RCVPRN>
    ---</EDI_DC40>
    ---<E1EDK01 SEGMENT="value2">
    ---</E1EDK01>
    </IDOC>
    </ORDERS05>
    PITCLNT001 is the logical System name of PI. Do i need to configure "PITCLNT001" as logical system at SYSTEM_A (besides, thats not possile)?
    regards,
    MS
    Edited by: Manuel Schlestein on Jan 28, 2009 10:39 AM
    Edited by: Manuel Schlestein on Jan 28, 2009 10:40 AM

    Hi
    Create a logical system for SYSTEM_A in SLD (you can give some string) and create that same logical
    system in IDOC side (SALE).
    Thanks
    Prasad Nemalikanti

  • How to change or rename the logical system name T90CLNT090 IN BI 7

    HI Expert's,
    i am really digging for the solution of changing or renaming the logical system name technical name T90CLNT090.
    in our company we are using ecc5.0 with bi 3.5 and ecc6 with bi 7. In BW 3.5 having a connection with R/3 and the technical name of the myself bw source system(logical system) is T90CLNT090.
    In bi 7 also the logical system name is same as T90CLNT090. Because of the same system name(Logical name) it is not active in BI7 and also it's giving error when i am activating the DSO Object as Transfer structure prefix for source system T90CLNT090 is not defined.
    because of this i am not able to create the source system between r/3 also.
    so how to change this source system name for T90CLNT090.
    regards
    harikrishna N

    Hi,
    Pls follow this OSS note : 325525.
    Note 325525 - Copying and renaming systems in a BW environment
    Summary
    Symptom WARNING: THIS NOTE HAS BEEN REPLACED.  FOR MORE CURRENT AND MORE COMPREHENSIVE INFORMATION SEE NEW NOTE 886102.
    You want to copy and or rename one or more systems (database or client copy). One or more of the systems is a BW system or is connected to a BW system.
    Caution: This note only deals with problems that occur in the BW source system connections. Other problems that occur in the BW environment (indexes) are NOT dealt with. See URL http://www.service.sap.com/bw --> Services & Implementation --> System copy & Migration.
    Other terms BW, source system, OLTP, database copy, client copy, system infrastructure, transport system, connections, RFC connection, trfc, transfer structure, IDoc, ALE customizing, logical system name, system changeability, renaming systems, system copy
    Solution Several scenarios are possible in this environment. Find the scenario relevant to your situation below and execute the steps listed or read the note(s) specified:
    Scenario 1) You do not want to copy a system but only want to rename one (changing a logical system name).
               Solution scenario 1): Execute Transaction BDLS both in the client to be renamed and in the connected BWs or BW source systems. To do this, see Notes 121163 and 369758.
               Check the RFC destinations in all connected BWs/BW source systems as described in Note 524554.
               Reactivate all partner agreements that carry the new logical system name after renaming.
    Scenario 2) You want to copy the entire system infrastructure connected by the BW source system connections (that means the entire system group) by a database copy. SAP recommends this procedure for copying systems.
               Solution scenario 2):
    If you want to rename one or more of the copied systems, then execute Transaction BDLS both in the client you wish to rename and in all the connected BW and BW source systems. See Note 121163.
                        Make sure that an RFC destination exists with the new logical name in every connected BW or BW source system.
                        Reactivate all partner agreements that carry the new logical system name after renaming.
    Change the hosts in the appropriate RFC destinations so that they refer to the correct computer. For this, see Note 524554.
    Scenario 3) You want to copy a single BW system of the group by database copy.
    Scenario 3)a) You only want to exchange the hardware of your system but do not want to rename the system.
                         Solution scenario 3)a): You do not need to execute follow-up work regarding the system connections, except for adjusting the IP address in the RFC destinations of the connected system.
    Scenario 3)b) You want to keep the original system of the copy so that you have two systems after copying.
                         Solution scenario 3)b): See Note 184754.
    Scenario 4) You want to copy a single source system of the group by database copy.
    Scenario 4)a) You only want to exchange the hardware of your system but do not want to rename the system.
                         Solution scenario 4)a): You do not need to execute follow-up work regarding the system connections, except for adjusting the IP address in the RFC destinations of the connected system.
    Scenario 4)b) You want to keep the original system of the copy so that you have two systems after copying.
               Solution scenario 4)b): See Note 184322.
    Scenario 5) You want to import a client copy in a source system.
               Solution scenario 5): See Note 325470.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Suchitra.V

  • Stuck with logical system name for JDBC Sender system!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Hi All,
    I'm doing a scenario as JDBC2FILE.
    I tried to add my jdbc sender system to SLD. So i created the technical system
    now i'm creating business system...what should i give at logical system name tab? I've created tech system and business system as third party.
    do we need logical system name in this scenario where we are not interacting with any R/3???
    can anyone suggest the way to achieve this scenario?
    Thanks in advance.....
    Santhosh.

    Hi Santhosh,
    I just want to add ons..few more information which it might help you.
      You no need to give logical system when you are using Thirdpaty.
    Please check the below blog you will get more idea how to proceed to achieve the JDBC Scenario.
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/06/01/file-to-jdbc-adapter-using-sap-xi-30
    If you have any doubts while proceeding with your scenario plesae let me know..I will try my level best.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Chandu

  • Logical System for Integration Process

    I am getting a error message for my Integration Process: "Unable to convert sender service IP_Kleinschmidt_Shipments to an ALE logical system"
    I am confused as to what i need to put in the IP -> Service -> Adapter Specific Identifires ->Logical System.
    I won't let me enter either the R3 system nor the XI system.
    What value do I need to put here so my acknoldgement can go back to the R3 system?

    Use header mapping in receiver agreement to apply a business system as sender of the Idoc message.
    That business system must have a logical system aplied and this should be maintained in R/3 as well.
    if you use XI system as logical system as IDoc receiver in R/3, then you can apply also XI as sender here.
    But you have to load the PI as business system to ID for this reason.
    You cannot apply a logical system to the business system, which already used elsewhere.
    I discused that issue with the developer a couple of years ago. He told me to use the workaround.

  • XI 3 File to IDoc scenario - Still referencing Old Logical system

    Hi
    Dont know if you can help. I have a file to idoc scenario  using XI 3 to R/3 4.6c system.
    I had the interface working from a third party system XMLHUB to SAP R/3. The Logical system name for the XMLHUB was XMLHUB01 in the SLD which I have set up as a partner profile in R/3. I have recently changed the logical system name to XMLHUBDEV01 in the SLD and created that logical system in R/3 and changed the partner profile to XMLHUBDEV01.
    Unfortunately in the sender information of the IDoc the partner number is still XMLHUB01 and not XMLHUBDEV01. I don't understand where this partner is sent from to get into the control record of the IDoc.
    I have cleared the SLD cache in both the Repository and the directory. Is there somewhere else I should be looking? Any help would be appreciated.
    Regards
    Daniel

    hi daniel...
    this thread wud answer ur query....
    Re: IDOC Payload
    regards..
    vishal

  • JDBC to Idoc scenario - change of logical system name

    Hi,
    I have a JDBC to idoc scenario that worked. Now i had to change the logical system name from my sender system from ABC_123 into ABC123 in the SLD (Business System - Integration - Logical System name). I did so and also refreshed my Cache.
    Afterwards I started the process, but it failed in the Receiver system. The idoc is correct expect of the partner name. My receiver system expect ABC123 - as I changed in the SLD - but PI send ABC_123.
    If io look in SXI_CACHE - Services my Business System still got the "old" name (ABC_123).
    Did i miss something resp. how can i load the current configuration from SLD?
    Thanks in advance
    Michael

    Hi Michael,
    Again Import the changed logical system in the Integration directory of you PI system.
    And check the scenario (Sender Agreement, Receiver agreement ) what system they are reflecting.
    If they are showing old system then you have to replace the business system in all the scenario.
    Edited by: Rajhans Abhay on Jan 7, 2010 3:14 PM

  • Where to define third party logical system name in file to idoc scenario

    Hi Friends,
      I am shalini shah.
    I have one doubt, where I can define the logical system name in File to Idoc scenario.
    I created Logical system for R/3 system in SALE t.code, but where to define the Third party logical system ,
    In SALE or any where.
    Please give me solution.
    Warm Regards,
    Shalini Shah

    Hi Shalini,
    You need to create Business system in SLD and import the business system in ID.Then u will start with the configuration.
    Just refer the below link for configurations with step by step solution.
    File To IDOC - Part1 (SLD and Design):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC&
    File To IDOC - Part2 (Configuration):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part2+(Configuration)&
    File To IDOC - Part3 (Steps required in XI and R3):
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC-Part3(StepsrequiredinXIandR3)&
    Thnx
    Chirag

  • File to idoc scenario . how to create logical system

    logical system asking user authorization what should i do.
    what should be logical for whic we should degine partner profiles
    apoclnt800 or xi7clnt001

    Hi,
    The partner profile to be maintained in we20 (in backend systems -ECC/CRM etc) should be based on logical system for the sender.
    For ex: Src (File) -> PI -> Tgt(ECC)
    In SLD you have created Technical System(TS) and Business System(say BS) for Src. Also a Logical System name (Say LSNAME) is associated with BS.
    In ECC, goto tcode - sale, create a logical system of name LSNAME. Now goto we20 and create a partner profile of name LSNAME. Provide the message type of Idoc in the required place.
    Souvik

  • Logical System in file 2 idoc

    Hi
    I am developing an scenario of file to idoc.
    My problem is, when it is generating the idoc in target system, the Parner Number in control record is filling with the logical system name given when creating the business system. 
    I tried changing the logical system name with actual partner number which I want but giving an error   '  The selected integration server already has a business system with logical name "pidclnt001". Select a different integration server or change the logical name. '
    Can anybody advice me,  is it not possible to create two scenarios to send same Idoc to same system ?
    Regards,
    Shylesh

    Hi Shylesh !
    You need to enable the header mapping option in your receiver agreement to overwrite the Logical System name that is sent to the R/3 destination system...which now is the Logical System name linked to your sender system (info is in SLD if is a business SYSTEM or in the Adapter Specific identifier attributes if it is a business SERVICE)
    You cannot have more than 1 business service/system with the same Logical System name...but you can overwrite the sender logical system name that arrives to the destination R/3 system using the header mapping section of the receiver agreement as noted above.
    Regards,
    Matias.

  • IDOC sender: Error in Logical system name?

    Hi,
    In my current project, the IDOC sender system logical name is P2PCLNT100 but the SLD system name is P2P.
    Its an IDOC to proxy scenario. At the receiver system side, the schemeAgencyID is getting populated at P2P and not P2PCLNT100, due to which there is an error on the receiver's side.
    Following is already checked:
    1. SLD has maintained the proper logical system name for the P2P system
    2. The IDOC xml on the XI system has the sender port properly populated as P2PCLNT100
    3. I have also debugged the program on the receiver side and fails at a point where it checks the logical system name from the database BBP_BACKEND_DEST.
    On the receiver system, the followed error is shown as follows:
    - <STANDARD>
      <CONTROLLER />
      <FAULT_TEXT>An error occured within an XI interface: SLD system P2P is not known Programm: SAPLBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1; Include: LBBP_BD_MAPPING_SAPXML1F1Y; Line: 96</FAULT_TEXT>
      <FAULT_URL />
      <FAULT_DETAIL />
      </STANDARD>
    Thanks in advance for the useful answers.
    Sowkhya

    Hi,
    1. R/3 system's logical system name and SLD business system's logical system name has the same.
    Is there a need to have the business system name in SLD to have the same name as R/3 system logical name?? As far as my knowledge goes, business system and logical system need not have the same name. Correct me if in the case IDOC sender scenario is different..
    2. SLDCHECK shows following message:
    Summary: Connection to SLD does not work
    The issue still persists. Will SLDCHECK correct solve the issue?
    Regards,
    Sowkhya

  • ALE logical system - File -- XI -- R/3 scenario

    Hi
    I have the following scenario which I'm trying to run.
    File --> XI --> R/3 scenario.
    I have created a sender agreement XID|ASN_out|NBD where XID is my XI 3.0 system and NBD is my R/3 system. I have also created an interface determination and receiver determination.
    The following error is in transaction SXMB_MONI in my XID system:
    "Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system"
    Both XID and NBD are business systems defined in SLD and they have both a logical system assigned.
    Why do I get this error and how can I fix it?
    Best regards
    Göran
    Message was edited by: Göran Westin
    Message was edited by: Göran Westin

    Ok. I fixed the problem.
    In the Integration Builder - Configuration > Select business system of choice > Menu > Service > Adapter specific identifiers > IDOC Adapter > Logical system - got a value after reading/refreshing it from the SLD.

Maybe you are looking for

  • [SOLVED] Kernel panic - unable to mount root fs

    I'm having some trouble with my Toshiba NB255 netbook. It no longer boots after I performed a major pacman upgrade. It hangs with this error message: http://imgur.com/Cxj1z I did some research and found a couple of threads with problems similar to mi

  • Day Limit in Payment Terms

    Hello Gurus What is the "Day Limit" in Payment terms. If there is multiple day limit for a single payment term,which will be determined in the Purchase order? With Regards

  • Size of Articles and Folios after update

    Hi, with the new Content Viewer there is no way to see the size of folios and articles - is there any solution? We are working on Windows. Thanks for your help! Philipp

  • Failed using exec and wait_for_file functions in Unix for DS X3.1

    Hi, Unix version --> 11.23 running of HP-UXIA64 DS version   --> Data Services X3.1 I able to run exec and wait_for_file fuctions in my local Windows environment using cmd.exe to move files or copy files around folders. A) However, I failed to run Un

  • Help find JAXB mistake..

    Hi, I have a schema looks like this. <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xs:schema xmlns:jaxb="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/jaxb" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" elementFormDefault="qualified" jaxb:version="1.0">      <xs:element name="