LOV(af:selectOneChoice) with bind variable in af:table

Hi All,
I have a table where a column is defined as dropdown(af:selectOneChoice). The query for selectOneChoice has a bind variable which needs to be set as a value from the base view Object corresponding row.
Suppose a table Employee
EmpId EmpName EmpType Authorization
101 John Temp No
The above table is created as af:table and 'Authorization' is implemented as dropdown(af:selectOneChoice) . The selectOneChoice has a query(AuthorizationLovVVO) with bind variable . For each row of af:table(EmployeeVO) , af:selectOneChoice query(AuthorizationLovVVO) requires
the corresponding row(EmployeeVO) 'EmpType' to be set as value of bind variable.
Can you please suggest how can we achieve this functionality.
Edited by: 907302 on Oct 17, 2012 7:22 AM
Edited by: 907302 on Oct 17, 2012 7:22 AM

I have checked the following post where it has been suggested to access the the current row value as groovy expression.
groovy for bind variable
Suppose my AM name is 'TestAM' , i have tried the below expressions for value of bind variable but it does not work :
1) adf.object.TestAM.findViewObject('EmployeeVO1').currentRow.EmpType
2) adf.object.TestAMDataControl.findViewObject('EmployeeVO1').currentRow.EmpType
None of the above expressions work and i get the error while running the page as 'Variable NotesAM is not recognized.' / 'Variable NotesAMDataControl is not recognized.' .
Can you please suggest if we can achieve the functionality using this approach . Also let me know if i am missing something in the above expression.

Similar Messages

View with Bind Variable and ADF table

Hi all,
Please note what i have noticed. I created a view with a bind parameter, overriden the prepareSession of my Application Module to set the bind parameter and execute the query. I then created a simple jsf page and included the view as an adf read-only table. When i run the page, the prepareSession is called, sets the bind parameter, however the selected record of the table is always the second record (Not the first record).
This behaviour can be reproduced with the HR schema. Please follow the below instructions for reproducing the problem.
1. Create a Fusion Web Application (ADF).
2. Create business components from tables.
3. Create a new connection with the HR schema.
4. Import the Departments table as an entity and then click finish.
5. Create a view based on the Departments entity.
6. Modify the Query to include a where clause (where DDepartmentsEO.DEPARTMENT_NAME LIKE :BindParam)
7. Provide an order by clause (DepartmentsEO.DEPARTMENT_ID DESC)
8. Creata a bind variable named "BindParam" of type string.
9. Create an Application Module and include the view object.
10. Open the Application Module Class and override the prepareSession method
11. include the following code after super.prepareSession(session):
ViewObject myView = this.getDepartments1();
myView.setNamedWhereClauseParam("BindParam", "%");
myView.executeQuery();
12. Create a jsf page
13. Drag the view object on the page as an adf read-only table, selecting the Row Selection, Sorting and Filtering
14. Run the page.
You will see that instead of the first record being selected, the second record in the table is selected.
Can anyone please help me?
Thank you

First of all i would like to thank you for replying to my thread.
Secondly, i would like to inform you that the example that i have provided is just for REPRODUCTION purposes.
The real scenario has to do with setting the where clause with the authenticated user so that the view will query for data only associated with the authenticated user.
The only way to overcome this behaviour is to include a view action (namedWhereClause in the page definition)
However, this is not how i want to implement this. This was working properly in 10g

Can't create multiple dependent LOVs from the same bind variable

Hi all,
I'm having difficulty creating multiple dependent LOVs from queries based on the same bind variable in my JSF application (JDev 10.1.3.1). Basically I have a static LOV in a af:selectOneChoice component from which users select a value which then becomes the bind variable value for two separate queries that generate two different dependent LOV. Having developed the code along the lines of Steve Muench 's blog (http://radio.weblogs.com/0118231/2006/04/03.html#a685), the first dependent LOV works really well. The first dynamic LOV gets refreshed whenever the list from the static LOV changes, and I can execute other queries based on the values selected.
The problem arises when I want to create the second dynamic/dependent LOV that has the same bind variable based on the same selected value from the static LOV. Here I would also like the functionality whereby the second dynamic LOV is also refreshed after the selected value in the static LOV changes. Thinking that all I had to do was replicate the methodology used in creating the first dependent LOV, I created the second iterator, invokeAction and other binding components in the PageDef. The executable section now looks like the following:
<iterator id="SelectStaticQueryViewObjIterator"
              Binds="SelectStaticQueryViewObj" RangeSize="-1"
              DataControl="DMSApplicationModule1DataControl"/>
<invokeAction id="refreshDynamicQuery1BindParameter"
              Binds="ExecuteWithParams1" Refresh="prepareModel"
              RefreshCondition="#{empty requestScope.VariableChanged}"/>
<iterator id="SelectDynamicQuery1ViewObjIterator"
              Binds="SelectDynamicQuery1ViewObj" RangeSize="-1"
              DataControl="DMSApplicationModule1DataControl"/>
<invokeAction id="refreshDynamicQuery2BindParameter"
              Binds="ExecuteWithParams2" Refresh="prepareModel"
              RefreshCondition="#{empty requestScope.VariableChanged}"/>
<iterator id="SelectDynamicQuery2ViewObjIterator"
              Binds="SelectDynamicQuery2ViewObj" RangeSize="-1"
              DataControl="DMSApplicationModule1DataControl"/>I now have a problem whereby everytime I change the value of the static LOV, multiple HTML components for the same ADF component are being generated (the LOVs are refreshed via PPR). The surprising thing is that this duplicating behaviour applies to all ADF components listed after the first dynamic LOV in the *.jspx source. For example, I have a <af:outputText="Test Text"/> component created after the first dynamic LOV. Each time the value in the static LOV changes, a duplicate HTML component is created. This also applies to the 'related' second dynamic LOV which is bound to a af:selectOneChoice component - multiple dropdown lists are created. I've checked with the browser's Page Source and there are actually multiple html components being generated with their own unique ADF-generated IDs. I've tried all different options for the Referesh and RefreshCondition attibutes in the second invokeAction element but nothing seems to eliminate this issue.
Any suggestions about how I might create multiple dependent LOVs from the same bind variable that get refreshed when the selected value changes would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
George

Hi all,
Just updating the thread on how I've overcome this issue. As it stood the manner in which I was trying to solve my use case, as described above, was creating an absolute mess. Then with a blank sheet of paper I quickly realised that a much simpler solution would be to create a whole series of master-detail VOs and build my components around them. Thankfully I haven't had any issues going down this path as yet.
Cheers
George

Report Performance with Bind Variable

Getting some very odd behaviour with a report in APEX v 3.2.1.00.10
I have a complex query that takes 5 seconds to return via TOAD, but takes from 5 to 10 minutes in an APEX report.
I've narrowed it down to one particular bind. If I hard code the date in it returns in 6 seconds, but if I let the date be passed in from a parameter it takes 5+ minutes again.
Relevant part of the query (an inline view) is:
,(select rglr_lect lect
,sum(tpm) mtr_tpm
,sum(enrols) mtr_enrols
from ops_dash_meetings_report
where meet_ev_date between to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') - 363 and to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY')
group by rglr_lect) RPV
I've tried replacing the "to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') - 363" with another item which is populated with the date required (and verified by checking session state). If I replace the :P35_END_DATE with an actual date the performance is fine again.
The weird thing is that a trace file shows me exactly the same Explain Plan as the TOAD Explain where it runs in 5 seconds.
Another odd thing is that another page in my application has the same inline view and doesn't hit the performance problem.
The trace file did show some control characters (circumflex M) after each line of this report's query where these weren't anywhere else on the trace queries. I wondered if there was some sort of corruption in the source?
No problems due to pagination as the result set is only 31 records and all being displayed.
Really stumped here. Any advice or pointers would be most welcome.
Jon.

Don't worry about the Time column, the cost and cardinality are more important to see whther the CBO is making different decisions for whatever reason.
Remember that the explain plan shows the expected execution plan and a trace shows the actual execution plan. So what you want to do is compare the query with bind variables from an APEX page trace to a trace from TOAD (or sqlplus or whatever). You can do this outside APEX like this...
ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 1';Enter and run your SQL statement...;
ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=FALSE;This will create a a trace file in the directory returned by...
SELECT value FROM v$parameter WHERE name = 'user_dump_dest' Which you can use tkprof to format.
I am assuming that your not going over DB links or anything else slightly unusual?
Cheers
Ben

Problem with Bind Variable in 11.2

Hi
I have a slow statement with bind Variables. With literals it works fine. Is there a way to replace the bind by literal in advanced ? I use Release 11.2.0.2.3
Thank you

904062 wrote:
I have a slow statement with bind Variables. With literals it works fine. Is there a way to replace the bind by literal in advanced ? I use Release 11.2.0.2.3This specific scenario is very much an exception to the rule - and you need to back your statement up with execution plans of the SQL with bind variables and with literals, and run stats that show the difference between these two execution plans.
See the {message:id=9360003} from the {forum:id=75} forum's FAQ for details on how to post a SQL performance tuning question.

Query with bind variable, how can use it in managed bean ?

Hi
I create query with bind variable (BindControlTextValue), this query return description of value that i set in BindControlTextValue variable, how can i use this query in managed bean? I need to set this value in String parameter in managed bean.
Thanks

Put the query in a VO and execute it the usual way.
If you need to, you can write a parameterized method in VOImpl that executes the VO query with the parameter and then call that method from the UI (as a methodAction binding) either through the managed bean or via a direct button click on the page.

SLOW report performance with bind variable

Environment: 11.1.0.7.2, Apex 4.01.
I've got a simplified report page where the report runs slowly compared to running the same query in sqldeveloper. The report region is based on a pl/sql function returning a query. If I use a bind variable in the query inside apex it takes 13 seconds to run, and if I hard code a string it takes only a few hundredths of a second. The query returns one row from a table which has 1.6 million rows. Statistics are up-to-date and the columns in the joins and where clause are indexed.
I've run traces using p_trace=YES from Apex for both the bind variable and hard coded strings. They are below.
The sqldeveloper explain plan is identical to the bind variable plan from the trace, yet the query runs in 0.0x seconds in sqldeveloper.
What is it about bind variable syntax in Apex that is causing the bad execution plan? Apex Bug? 11g bug? Ideas?
tkprof output from Apex trace with bind variable is below...
select p.master_id link, p.first_name||' '||p.middle_name||' '||p.last_name||' '||p.suffix personname,
p.gender||' '||p.date_of_birth g_dob, p.master_id||'*****'||substr(p.ssn,-4) ssn, p.status status
from persons p
where
   p.person_id in (select ps.person_id from person_systems ps where ps.source_key like LTRIM(RTRIM(:P71_SEARCH_SOURCE1)))
order by 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          1         27           0
Fetch        2     13.15      13.22      67694      72865          0           1
total        4     13.15      13.23      67694      72866         27           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 62 (ODPS_PRIVACYVAULT)   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 SORT ORDER BY (cr=72869 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us cost=29615 size=14255040 card=178188)
      1   FILTER (cr=72869 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1    HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI (cr=72865 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us cost=26308 size=14255040 card=178188)
      1     INDEX FAST FULL SCAN IDX$$_0A300001 (cr=18545 pr=13379 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4993 size=2937776 card=183611)(object id 68485)
1696485     TABLE ACCESS FULL PERSONS (cr=54320 pr=54315 pw=0 time=21965 us cost=14958 size=108575040 card=1696485)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      1   SORT (ORDER BY)
      1    FILTER
      1     HASH JOIN (RIGHT SEMI)
      1      INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF
                 'IDX$$_0A300001' (INDEX)
1696485      TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (FULL) OF 'PERSONS' (TABLE)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait Total Waited
----------------------------------------   Waited ---------- ------------
db file scattered read                       1276        0.00          0.16
db file sequential read                       812        0.00          0.02
direct path read                             1552        0.00          0.61
********************************************************************************Here's the tkprof output with a hard coded string:
select p.master_id link, p.first_name||' '||p.middle_name||' '||p.last_name||' '||p.suffix personname,
p.gender||' '||p.date_of_birth g_dob, p.master_id||'*****'||substr(p.ssn,-4) ssn, p.status status
from persons p
where
   p.person_id in (select ps.person_id from person_systems ps where ps.source_key like LTRIM(RTRIM('0b')))
order by 1
call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
Parse        1      0.02       0.04          0          0          0           0
Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0         13           0
Fetch        2      0.00       0.00          0          8          0           1
total        4      0.02       0.04          0          8         13           1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 62 (ODPS_PRIVACYVAULT)   (recursive depth: 1)
Rows     Row Source Operation
      1 SORT ORDER BY (cr=10 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=9 size=80 card=1)
      1   FILTER (cr=10 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1    NESTED LOOPS (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
      1     NESTED LOOPS (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=8 size=80 card=1)
      1      SORT UNIQUE (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5 size=16 card=1)
      1       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID PERSON_SYSTEMS (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5 size=16 card=1)
      1        INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_PERSON_SYSTEMS_SOURCE_KEY (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=3 size=0 card=1)(object id 68561)
      1      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_PERSONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 68506)
      1     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID PERSONS (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=64 card=1)
Rows     Execution Plan
      0 SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
      1   SORT (ORDER BY)
      1    FILTER
      1     NESTED LOOPS
      1      NESTED LOOPS
      1       SORT (UNIQUE)
      1        TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                   'PERSON_SYSTEMS' (TABLE)
      1         INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF
                    'IDX_PERSON_SYSTEMS_SOURCE_KEY' (INDEX)
      1       INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'PK_PERSONS'
                  (INDEX (UNIQUE))
      1      TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                 'PERSONS' (TABLE)

Patrick, interesting insight. Thank you.
The optimizer must be peeking at my bind variables with it's eyes closed. I'm the only one testing and I've never passed %anything as a bind value. :)
Here's what I've learned since my last post:
I don't think that sqldeveloper is actually using the explain plan it says it is. When I run explain plan in sqldeveloper (with a bind variable) it shows me the exact same plan as Apex with a bind variable. However, when I run autotrace in sqldeveloper, it takes a path that matches the hard coded values, and returns results in half a second. That autotrace run is consistent with actually running the query outside of autotrace. So, I think either sqldeveloper isn't really using bind variables, OR it is using them in some other way that Apex does not, or maybe optimizer peeking works in sqldeveloper?
Using optimizer hints to tweak the plan helps. I've tried both /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ and /*+ index(ps pk_persons) */ and both drop the query to about a second. However, I'm loath to use hints because of the very dynamic nature of the query (and Tom Kyte doesn't like them either). The hints may end up hurting other variations on the query.
I also tested the query by wrapping it in a select count(1) from ([long query]) and testing the performance in sqldeveloper and in Apex. The performance in that case is identical with both bind variables and hard coded variables for both Apex and SqlDeveloper. That to me was very interesting and I went so far as to set up two bind variable report regions on the same page. One region wrapped the long query with select count(1) from (...) and the other didn't. The wrapped query ran in 0.01 seconds, the unwrapped took 15ish seconds with no other optimizations. Very strange.
To get performance up to acceptable levels I have changed my function returning query to:
1) Set the equality operator to "=" for values without wildcards and "like" for user input with wildcards. This makes a HUGE difference IF no wildcard is used.
2) Insert a /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ hint when users chose the column that requires the sub-query. This obviously changes the optimizer's plan and improves query speed from 15 seconds to 1.5 seconds even with wildcards.
I will NOT be hard coding any user supplied values in the query string. As you can probably tell by the query, this is an application where sql injection would be very bad.
Jeff, regarding your question about "like '%' || :P71_SEARCH_SOURCE1 || '%'". I've found that putting wildcards around values, particularly at the beginning will negate any indexing on the column in question and slows performance even more.
I'm still left wondering if there isn't something in Apex that is breaking the optimizer "peeking" that Patrick describes. Perhaps something in the way it switches contexts from apex_public_user to the workspace schema?

ADF Groovy Expression with bind variable and ResourceBundle

Now I have ViewObject which have WHERE clause with bind variable.
This bind variable is for language. Within bind variable I can change Value Type to Expression and into Value: I put +(ResourceBundle.getBundle("model.ModelBundle")).getString("language")+.
Now if I run Oracle Business Component Browser (on AppModule) this works. In my ModelBundle.properties there is language=1 name-value pair. And with different locale I have different language number.
Now if I put that ViewObject on one JSF, this bind variable expression does not work any more. Error:
*oracle.jbo.JboException: JBO-29000: Unexpected exception caught: java.util.MissingResourceException, msg=Can't find bundle for base name model.ModelBundle, locale my_locale*
Any ideas?
10x
Zmeda

The most wierd thing is that, if I make ViewObjectImpl and insert this method
public String getLanguage() {
return (ResourceBundle.getBundle("model.ModelBundle")).getString("language");
and call it in Bind Variable Expression Value: viewObject.getLanguage()
IT WORKS!
But why with groovy expression it does not work?
Zmeda

How to querie with bind variable in findMode?

Hallo,
is it possible to use a querie with bind variable in findMode? And when how is it possible to initialize the bind variable?
Any help is appreciated.

Hi,
bind variables can be linked from teh ADF binding to e.g. a managed bean, the sessionScope or other binding attributes via EL. So when you go into findMode and execute the query, the EL will grab the bindVariable values automatically.
Frank

Detail view with bind variable. TreeTable not showing all detail result.

I’m having trouble with treeTable using detail view with bind variables and where clause defined in VO definition.
Both, master and detail view objects, base on the same entity and have the same condition in where clause. The view objects also have bind variables, which are set in prepareRowSetForQuery() method.
Again, these are two different views, that get different result, based on value of one of the bind variable.
When I show results in two different tables on jsf page, where master table has "RowSelection" set on "single", all results are displayed in detail table.
But when I use treeTable, only the first result of the detail is shown.

I tested it in applicationModule and it works, but i think that's the same as two tables on a jsf page.
This is the order in which overridden methods are called in ADF BC or two tables on jsf page
when clicking on row in master table.
PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
   Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object; -> print of the object2[] parameter in executeQueryForCollection
     List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
     List 1: 400035313 -> viewLink parameter value
getEstimatedRowCount_Detail
count: 2
getEstimatedRowCount_Detail
count: 2 And when i click on "expand node" in tree table:
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2
PrepareRowSetForQuery_Detail
executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
   Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
     List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
     List 1: 400035321
PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
   Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
     List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
     List 1: 400035313
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2
PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
   Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
     List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
     List 1: 400035313
PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
   Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
     List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
     List 1: 400035321
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2
getEstimatedRowCount_Root
count: 2Values of user parameters are OK. Is there another method that i should override?
I also noticed, that if detail view doesn't have user bind variables, the tree works fine and is shown even in ADF BC (aplication module).
I guess we loose a tree, when using bind variables in detail view object.
Is there a way around it?

SQL query with Bind variable with slower execution plan

I have a 'normal' sql select-insert statement (not using bind variable) and it yields the following execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 HASH JOIN (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=100)
3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=1)
4 1 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE)
(Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
18 db block gets
15558 consistent gets
47 physical reads
9896 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1095 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
I have the same query but instead running using bind variable (I test it with both oracle form and SQL*plus), it takes considerably longer with a different execution plan:-
Execution Plan
0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=100)
2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
3 2 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
4 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
12 db block gets
3003199 consistent gets
54 physical reads
9448 redo size
423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
1258 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
55 rows processed
TABLEA has around 3million record while TABLEB has 300 records. Is there anyway I can improve the speed of the sql query with bind variable? I have DBA Access to the database
Regards
Ivan

Many thanks for your reply.
I have run the statistic already for the both tableA and tableB as well all the indexes associated with both table (using dbms_stats, I am on 9i db ) but not the indexed columns.
for table I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', tabname=> 'TABLEA', partname=> NULL);
end;
for index I use:-
begin
dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', indname=> 'TABLEB_IDX_003', partname=> NULL);
end;
Is it possible to show me a sample of how to collect statisc for INDEX columns stats?
regards
Ivan

BC4J bug with "bind variables" JBO-27122 ORA-01008

I think we are found a BUG using BC4J with bind variables in a view object.
If the bind variable appear in the WHERE condition two or more times at
the beginning of the query the above error occur.
oracle.jbo.SQLStmtException: JBO-27122: SQL error during statement preparation. Statement:
SELECT Emp.EMPNO,Emp.ENAME,Emp.JOB,Emp.MGR,Emp.HIREDATE,Emp.SAL,Emp.COMM, Emp.DEPTNO
FROM SCOTT.EMP Emp
WHERE :1 <=10000 and :1 <= sal and :2=20
java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01008: not all variables bound
Otherwise if bind variable apper two or more times, but not together
like this sample:
WHERE :1 <=10000 and :2=20 and :1 <= sal
the error not occur.
We prove this with:
JDeveloper 9.0.5.2 (build 1618)Business Components Version 9.0.5.16.0
JDeveloper 9.0.5.0 (build 1375)Business Components Version 9.0.5.13.52
I looking for a patch! or acceptable workaround.
Tx for your help!
diego.
/* the cliente app */
ApplicationModule am = Configuration.createRootApplicationModule("business_tier.AppModule","AppModuleLocal");
ViewObject vo = am.findViewObject("EmpView");
vo.setWhereClauseParam(0,"100");
vo.setWhereClauseParam(1,"20");
Row emp = vo.first();

This is a known bug (1326006). The workaround is to use:
vo.setWhereClauseParam(0,"100");
vo.setWhereClauseParam(1,"20");
vo.setWhereClauseParam(2,"20");
Hope this helps,
Lynn
Java Tools Team

Af:query with bind variables and Saved Search

I have a VO and view criteria(VC).
VC has a criteria item ObsoleteDate with range specified as bindVariables "dateFrm" and "dateTo" I dragged & dropped the named criteria as af:Query with table. Table toolbar has 2 buttons in which I set & clear the bind variables. Data is fetched as per as expected based on the VC & bind variables.
The problem is,
If I save my search with bind variables set and swap between the saved searches , all works fine. But the moment I clear bind variables & swap between searches.. "dateFrm" is populated and "dateTo" is null and I get an Exception oracle.jbo.AttrValException: JBO-27035: Attribute Obsolete Date: is required.
Why is this happening?? Saved search is supposed to save the VC with all the bind values set while saving and clearing bind variables shouldn't affect the saved search, right?? Or I have understood it wrong?
I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.3.0
Thanks

Try
like ? || '%'

Help with bind variables

Hello I'm new to .net and I'm trying to work with bind variables
I keep getting the ORA-01036: illegal variable name/number error.
here's my code, can somebody help me out and show me what am I doing wrong?
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim drLocation As OracleDataReader = getSCLocation("SOMEBODY")
End Sub
Private Function getSCLocation(ByVal contactName As String) As OracleDataReader
Dim drLocation As OracleDataReader
Dim connString As String = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("scConnString").ConnectionString
Dim conn As New OracleConnection(connString)
conn.Open()
Dim queryString As String = "select a.location, a.location_name from locationm1 a where a.primary_contact_dept in (select b.dept from contactsm1 b where b.contact_name = p_contactName)"
Dim p_contactName As New OracleParameter
p_contactName.OracleType = OracleType.VarChar
p_contactName.Value = contactName
Dim cmdLocation As New OracleCommand(queryString, conn)
cmdLocation.Parameters.Add(p_contactName)
drLocation = cmdLocation.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior.CloseConnection)
Return drLocation
End Function
Thanks
Peter

never mind i got it by playing around with it
had to change the way to start the bind variable
Dim p_contactName As New OracleParameter("p_contactName", OracleType.VarChar)
p_contactName.Size = 140
p_contactName.Value = contactName

ODT Query Window. Query with binding variable?

I have the ODT 11.1.0.7.20 installed.
In "Query Window", I execute an SQL with binding variables. But I only get ORA-01008 errors. How do I do that?
I want to double click an SQL and load it in "Query Window". How do I do that?
I want to right click an SQL and select "Open with Query Window". How do I do that?
In Query Window I want to load an SQL either by drag and drop or by select a function "Open SQL". How do I do that?
Why none of these functionalities work as you could expect?
Thanks,
Tobias

Finally i found the problem..
The problem was that i had to remove one line from the properties of my table departments, the property: selectedrowkeys, because it only passed the last selected row.
Still, i apreciate the help and i had to replace some code in the bean.java , because of the exception error and you didn't had to do that. Maybe i did some configuration in the wrong way and it went wrong.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Frederico.

LOV(af:selectOneChoice) with bind variable in af:table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for