LOV filter issue

When we enter a value on the base page and click on the LOV we get the usual popup window. When we now try to conduct a search within the popup window the results are filtered so we can onlly return the intial value. In other words the second query we attempt to run within the popup window can only be a subset of the initial search. Any ideas?
Mike

Here is an idea and it is only a guess as I have only used this technique to init a querybean search. Instead of filtering the VO at the query that is the source of the LOV, place a controller on the table that contains the items for the the LOV. This is typically under the messageLOVInput item.
In that controller, within the processRequest method get a reference to the vo and do a setWhereClause to do the inital default then do the executeQuery on the VO. This will only happen once during the initial LOV launch as it is in the processRequest.
Hoe this helps.
Kristofer Cruz

Similar Messages

  • Oracle APEX 4.0 - Interactive Report - Table Column Filter Issue Posted: No

    Environment: Oracle APEX 4.0 - Interactive Report - Table Column header Filter Issue
    We have developed an interactive report using Oracle APEX 4.0, which contains a record count of around 3,000 Rows. All the rows values are unique in nature. When we try to filter the same with the help of column header filter option available in the interactive report,We get only 1000 records.
    Could some one help us, why this behaviour under APEX Table Column Header Filter as if it does not display beyond 1000 distinct values.
    Is there a way or workaround on how to get all the records in the column header filter?
    Thanks in advance.
    Krish

    Krish,
    Interactive report has hard coded limit to display 1000 rows of column filter LOV for performance. Unfortunately, the limit cannot be changed. The workaround is to define a Column Filter LOV for the column instead of using "Default Based on Column Type".
    Regards,
    Christina

  • Filter Issues in P6.2.1

    I am facing filter issues in P6.2.1. I used the customized filter for "Planned but Not Started". Below shown were the combination i used to create the filter. but when i run the filter no activities were shown under WBS, i mean empty WBS
    1. Early Start - within a range of - PS - DD
    Activity Status - Not Started.
    2. Early Start - less than or equal to - DD
    Activity Status - Not Started.

    Hi,
    My feeling is that perhaps you don't have any task that is late.
    If not, please try following filter:
    Start is less than or equals to DD
    Activity staus not started yet
    I hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Younus

  • Essbase Security Filter issue.

    Hi,
    Its regarding the security filter issue.
    The major problem is whosoever user is provisioned under that security filter, if the user is trying to connect to Application using Excel Addin / Smartview, it crashes the essbase server [Network Error [10061], timed out error)]
    When we figured out because of this filter essbase server is crashing, we tried to edit the filter. sometimes if we click on edit, it crashes the server or sometimes we can see some junk characters in the filter.
    We have applied the security on Entities dimension and problematic filter is ASP.
    Now the hirerachy is like this.
    Entities dimesnsion and then ASP member and under ASP we have our several members.
    Filter is like this:
    Write : @Idescendants("ASP")
    It was working fine for almost 15 days.
    Now if i edit the filter, i can see like this:
    Write : @Idescendants("ASP")
    Metaread:@Idescendants("*&^%?)
    Junk characters are coming in and no idea from where they are coming.
    I can't delete the filter also, again it crashes the essbase server.
    As a workaround i have created a temp filter and dome the assignation for this group, according to that.
    Everything is working fine.
    I just wanted to know, has anybody faced such kind of problem earlier.
    What cud be the root cause for this.
    How could I delete the filter.
    I have also get messages like security file is corrupted (we have restored it from old backup) but really worried about security file as we are moving the whole thing to production server this weekend.
    Please advise me on this, Please help me. Any help would be highly appreciated.
    I am really in trouble.
    Thanks,
    Pankaj Mehta.

    Try to edit the filter from MaxL command line using
    alter filter sample.basic.filt7 add write on '@IDescendants("ASP")';
    here sample=application
    basic=database
    filt7=filtername
    have good luck

  • Oracle APEX 4.0  -  Interactive Report - Table Column Filter Issue

    Environment: Oracle APEX 4.0  -  Interactive Report - Table Column header Filter Issue
    We have developed an interactive report using Oracle APEX 4.0, which contains a record count of around 3,000 Rows. All the rows values are unique in nature. When we try to filter the same with the help of column header filter option available in the interactive report,We get only 1000 records.
    Could some one help us, why this behaviour under APEX Table Column Header Filter as if it does not display beyond 1000 distinct values.
    Is there a way or workaround on how to get all the records in the column header filter?
    Thanks in advance.
    Krish

    Hi
    Thanks for the advice and this issue has been moved to the below URL
    Oracle APEX 4.0 - Interactive Report - Table Column Filter Issue Posted: No
    Krish

  • Webdynrpo ALV filter issue

    Hi All,
    In web dynpro ALV we have one column called Article . I am trying to find the article 661-2689 by using Standard SAP filter option but the Article is getting converted to 000000000000000661-000000000000002689 . This zero appending happens when I choose the Filter/ Press enter key . It does not find the article by using Filter option .
    Our system version is SAP_BASIS 700 . Please let me know if there is any solution to this ALV Filter issue .
    Thanks in advance,
    Kiran.

    Hi Kiran,
    It depends on the attribute's data element. If it's NUMC this property is automatically displayed in the context in the bottom panel labeled "Formatting".
    But if you are trying to do it whit Article i think the data element is MATNR of type CHAR, so this property will not be displayed.
    May be, you need to convert the value assigned to your filter field before to trigger the filter. I think you have created an action for the event "onFilter" in your table, so in this action before to do "wd_this->table_filter->apply_filter( )" maybe you need to use the FM CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_OUTPUT in order to quit the leading zeros.

  • LOV filter - Auto Submit not working after the value is made to VS.filter

    JDeveloper 11.1.1.4.0
    I have cascading LOV filters for a table with fields id, deptid, projectName. The filters are for deptid and projectName. When I select a deptid, the projectNames belonging to that deptid should be populated. I have set Auto submit for deptid filter and partial trigger for project Name. So if I select a deptid and when I navigate to Project Name filter I get the list of project Names in the Project LOV filter.This worked fine as long as I didnt change the value for LOV to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid. Once I changed it the LOV filter for Project Names only got refreshed once I hit ENTER key after changing the value of Deptid. But I have to keep the value for LOV to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid. Other wise the records in the table after applying the filter values didnt function properly. I dont know whether the AutoSubmit does not work when the value is changed to Vs.filtercriteria.deptid

    duplicate post.
    Frank

  • NULL IS NOT NULL filter issue

    Can someone explain why 'Y' = 'N' is not working with PARALLEL Plan? i.e. With the filter like 'Y' = 'N' specified and if PQ is used , it does not return instantly. In fact it reads the entire table.
    Here is the test case.. Goal is to execute only one of the SQL joined by union all. I have included 'Y' = 'N' in both SQLs for the test purpose.
    DB Version is 10.2.0.4
    Create table test_tbl_01 nologging as select do.* from dba_objects do , dba_objects d1 where rownum < 22000001;
    Create table test_tbl_02 nologging as select do.* from dba_objects do , dba_objects d1 where rownum < 22000001;
    execute DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS('SCOTT', 'TEST_TBL_01');
    execute DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS('SCOTT', 'TEST_TBL_02');
    *Serial path with 2 table join*
    SQL> select
      2    /* parallel(t1,2 ) parallel(t2,2) */
      3    t1.*
      4    from test_tbl_01 t1 ,test_tbl_02 t2
      5    where t1.object_name = t2.object_name
      6    and  'Y' = 'N'
      7    and  t1.object_type = 'TABLE'
      8    union all
      9    select
    10    /* parallel(t1,2 ) parallel(t2,2) */
    11    t1.*
    12    from test_tbl_01 t1 ,test_tbl_02 t2
    13    where t1.object_name = t2.object_name
    14    and  'Y' = 'N'
    15  /
    no rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3500703583
    | Id  | Operation            | Name        | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |             |     2 |   168 |       |     0   (0)|          |
    |   1 |  UNION-ALL           |             |       |       |       |            |          |
    |*  2 |   FILTER             |             |       |       |       |            |          |
    |*  3 |    HASH JOIN         |             |   660G|    50T|   449M|  6242K (99)| 24:16:38 |
    |*  4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |  5477K|   386M|       | 41261   (2)| 00:09:38 |
    |   5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_02 |    22M|   212M|       | 40933   (2)| 00:09:34 |
    |*  6 |   FILTER             |             |       |       |       |            |          |
    |*  7 |    HASH JOIN         |             |  2640G|   201T|   467M|    24M(100)| 95:54:53 |
    |   8 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_02 |    22M|   212M|       | 40933   (2)| 00:09:34 |
    |   9 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |    21M|  1546M|       | 41373   (3)| 00:09:40 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
       3 - access("T1"."OBJECT_NAME"="T2"."OBJECT_NAME")
       4 - filter("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')
       6 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
       7 - access("T1"."OBJECT_NAME"="T2"."OBJECT_NAME")
    Statistics
              1  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
              0  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
            567  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            232  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              1  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              0  rows processed
    *Parallel path with 2 table join*
    SQL> select
      2    /*+ parallel(t1,2 ) parallel(t2,2) */
      3    t1.*
      4    from test_tbl_01 t1 ,test_tbl_02 t2
      5    where t1.object_name = t2.object_name
      6    and  'Y' = 'N'
      7    and  t1.object_type = 'TABLE'
      8    union all
      9    select
    10    /*+ parallel(t1,2 ) parallel(t2,2) */
    11    t1.*
    12    from test_tbl_01 t1 ,test_tbl_02 t2
    13    where t1.object_name = t2.object_name
    14    and  'Y' = 'N'
    15  /
    no rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:01:09.34
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 1557722279
    | Id  | Operation                   | Name        | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |             |     2 |   168 |       |     0   (0)|          |     |         |            |
    |   1 |  PX COORDINATOR             |             |       |       |       |            |          |     |         |            |
    |   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)       | :TQ10004    |       |       |       |            |          |  Q1,04 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   3 |    BUFFER SORT              |             |     2 |   168 |       |            |          |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   4 |     UNION-ALL               |             |       |       |       |            |          |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |*  5 |      FILTER                 |             |       |       |       |            |          |  Q1,04 | PCWC |            |
    |*  6 |       HASH JOIN             |             |   660G|    50T|   224M|  3465K (99)| 13:28:42 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   7 |        PX JOIN FILTER CREATE| :BF0000     |  5477K|   386M|       | 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   8 |         PX RECEIVE          |             |  5477K|   386M|       | 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |   9 |          PX SEND HASH       | :TQ10000    |  5477K|   386M|       | 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | P->P | HASH       |
    |  10 |           PX BLOCK ITERATOR |             |  5477K|   386M|       | 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |* 11 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |  5477K|   386M|       | 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    |  12 |        PX RECEIVE           |             |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  13 |         PX SEND HASH        | :TQ10001    |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,01 | P->P | HASH       |
    |  14 |          PX JOIN FILTER USE | :BF0000     |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
    |  15 |           PX BLOCK ITERATOR |             |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,01 | PCWC |            |
    |  16 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_02 |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,01 | PCWP |            |
    |* 17 |      FILTER                 |             |       |       |       |            |          |  Q1,04 | PCWC |            |
    |* 18 |       HASH JOIN             |             |  2640G|   201T|   233M|    13M(100)| 53:15:52 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  19 |        PX RECEIVE           |             |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  20 |         PX SEND HASH        | :TQ10002    |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,02 | P->P | HASH       |
    |  21 |          PX BLOCK ITERATOR  |             |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
    |  22 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST_TBL_02 |    22M|   212M|       | 22679   (1)| 00:05:18 |  Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
    |  23 |        PX RECEIVE           |             |    21M|  1546M|       | 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,04 | PCWP |            |
    |  24 |         PX SEND HASH        | :TQ10003    |    21M|  1546M|       | 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,03 | P->P | HASH       |
    |  25 |          PX BLOCK ITERATOR  |             |    21M|  1546M|       | 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,03 | PCWC |            |
    |  26 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL | TEST_TBL_01 |    21M|  1546M|       | 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       5 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
       6 - access("T1"."OBJECT_NAME"="T2"."OBJECT_NAME")
      11 - filter("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')
      17 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
      18 - access("T1"."OBJECT_NAME"="T2"."OBJECT_NAME")
    Statistics
           1617  recursive calls
              3  db block gets
         488929  consistent gets
         493407  physical reads
            636  redo size
            567  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            232  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              1  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              6  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              0  rows processedHowever single table with UNION ALL and PQ works..
    *NO Joins (i.e. Single Table with PQ )  , Issue does not show-up.*
    _*SERIAL PLAN with one Table*_
    SQL> select
      2    /* parallel(t1,2 )   */
      3    t1.*
      4    from test_tbl_01 t1
      5    where 'Y' = 'N'
      6    and  t1.object_type = 'TABLE'
      7    union all
      8    select
      9    /* parallel(t1,2 )   */
    10    t1.*
    11    from test_tbl_01 t1
    12    where 'Y' = 'N'
    13  /
    no rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.01
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 2870519681
    | Id  | Operation           | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |             |     2 |   148 |     0   (0)|          |
    |   1 |  UNION-ALL          |             |       |       |            |          |
    |*  2 |   FILTER            |             |       |       |            |          |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |  5477K|   386M| 41261   (2)| 00:09:38 |
    |*  4 |   FILTER            |             |       |       |            |          |
    |   5 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |    21M|  1546M| 41373   (3)| 00:09:40 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       2 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
       3 - filter("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')
       4 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
    Statistics
              0  recursive calls
              0  db block gets
              0  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
              0  redo size
            567  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            232  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              1  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              0  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              0  rows processed
    _*PARALLEL PLAN with one Table*_
    SQL> select
      2    /*+ parallel(t1,2 )      */
      3    t1.*
      4    from test_tbl_01 t1
      5    where 'Y' = 'N'
      6    and  t1.object_type = 'TABLE'
      7    union all
      8    select
      9    /*+ parallel(t1,2 )      */
    10    t1.*
    11    from test_tbl_01 t1
    12    where 'Y' = 'N'
    13  /
    no rows selected
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.09
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3114025180
    | Id  | Operation              | Name        | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |    TQ  |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT       |             |     2 |   148 |     0   (0)|          |        |      |            |
    |   1 |  PX COORDINATOR        |             |       |       |            |          |        |      |            |
    |   2 |   PX SEND QC (RANDOM)  | :TQ10000    |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | P->S | QC (RAND)  |
    |   3 |    UNION-ALL           |             |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    |*  4 |     FILTER             |             |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   5 |      PX BLOCK ITERATOR |             |  5477K|   386M| 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |*  6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |  5477K|   386M| 22861   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    |*  7 |     FILTER             |             |       |       |            |          |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   8 |      PX BLOCK ITERATOR |             |    21M|  1546M| 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWC |            |
    |   9 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL| TEST_TBL_01 |    21M|  1546M| 22924   (2)| 00:05:21 |  Q1,00 | PCWP |            |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       4 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
       6 - filter("T1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='TABLE')
       7 - filter(NULL IS NOT NULL)
    Statistics
             28  recursive calls
              3  db block gets
              7  consistent gets
              0  physical reads
            628  redo size
            567  bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
            232  bytes received via SQL*Net from client
              1  SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
              2  sorts (memory)
              0  sorts (disk)
              0  rows processed

    The same behvious appears in 11.1.0.6, and you don't need such a large data set to prove the point. The paralllel distribution may change to a broadcast with a smaller data set, but I demonstrated the effect when my two tables simply selected 30,000 rows each from all_objects.
    I think you should pass this to Oracle Corp. as a bug - using the smaller data set.
    The problem seems to be the way that Oracle combines multiple lines of a plan into groups of operations (as in PCWC, PCWC, PCWP). It looks like this particularly example has managed to fold the FILTER into a group in such a way that Oracle has lost track of the fact that it is a 'pre-emptng - i.e. always false' filter rather than an ordinary data filter; consequently the filter doesn't apply until after the hash join starts running.
    In my example (which did a broadcast distribution) I could see that Oracle read the entire first table, then started to read the second table, but stopped after one row of the second table, because my plan allowed the join and filter to be applied immediately after the first row from the second table. And I think Oracle decided that the filter was alway going to be false at that moment - so stopped running the second tablescan. You've used a hash/hash distribriution, which has resulted in both scans completing because the slaves in each layer don't talk to each other.
    Regards
    Jonathan Lewis
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
    http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
    "Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
    Carl Sagan

  • Filter issue in MDX query leaving some values empty!

    Hi all,
    In short: I have a report with multiple values such as name of shop, postal code etc. The parameters have no default value and act as "like". If someone enters "krant" he'll get all the shop names that contain "krant" in their
    name etc. 
    Same goes for postal code, if someone enters 2550 he'll get all data for 2550. The problem although is that if a user start with postal code as parameters and leaves the shop name empty, the shop name is not shown in my report! The other way around it works,
    when I enter shop name i'll get all shops + postal code in my report.
    I know this is because POS name cannot be shown in report because it's left blank, but I want my MDX query to be able to give me the POS names even if I only enter postal code.
    Can someone please please look at my query below? I need to add 4 more parameters this way later on too!
    SELECT 
    [Measures].[Sales amount]
     ON COLUMNS, NON EMPTY
    Filter(
                                   [Point of sale].[POS name].AllMembers,
                                   InStr(
                                                   [Point of sale].[POS name].CurrentMember.MEMBER_CAPTION,
                                                   @PAR_POSName
                                   ) > 0
    *Filter(
                                   [Point of sale].[POS postal code].AllMembers,
                                   InStr(
                                                   [Point of sale].[POS postal code].CurrentMember.MEMBER_CAPTION,
                                                  @PAR_POSTAL_CODE
                                   ) > 0
    *[Point of sale].[Client id].[Client id]
    *[Point of sale].[POS id].[POS id]
    *[Point of sale].[POS street].[POS street]
    *[Point of sale].[POS town].[POS town]
    *[Point of sale].[POS housenumber].[POS housenumber]
    ON ROWS
    FROM [mycube]

    Hi Yvanlathem,
    Have you create the parameters in the MDX Query Designer? I haved tested it on my local environment (Microsoft SQL Server 2012 (SP1) - 11.0.3401.0 (X64) Enterprise Edition (64-bit)), we cannot reproduce this issue.
    with
    set subset1
    as
    filter ([Geography].[Geography].[Country].members,
    instr([Geography].[Geography].currentmember.name,@name)>0
    select {} on 0,
    subset1 on 1
    from
    [Adventure Works]
    Reference
    Define Parameters in the MDX Query Designer for Analysis Services (Report Builder and SSRS)
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Upgrade Vista to Windows 7 Keyboard Filter Issue

    I really need some help with this...
    I upgraded vista to Windows 7 full retail version.
    Compatability check said to update keyboard filter. I couldnt find much info about this and assumed it wouldnt affect it too much except extra functions I probly never use.
    Unfortunately, my keyboard doesnt function properly at all.
    Im using HP G30-260US laptop.
    I have now disconnected the keyboard ribbon and plugged in a usb keyboard, quite a pain to use this one, but at least its working. I would really like to know of a fix for this issue to get my real keyboard working and windows 7 is already running on this computer, from upgrading, not a clean install. I've tried installing a different quick launch buttons driver and uninstalled it completely after windows 7 but no success.
    Please help me hehe
    Thanks a miillion
    Matt 
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    Matt, you may want to start a thread here:
    http://h30434.www3.hp.com/psg/?category.id=Noteboo​k
    It is HP's Notebook (laptop) forums.
    Signature:
    HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
    HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
    HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
    HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
    ++++++++++++++++++
    **Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
    Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
    I am not an HP employee.

  • Filter issues in BI 7.0

    Hi Experts,
    I have an issue with filters in BI 7.0. As per the requirement I need to restrict one object with two variables. One variable for named user and other variable for user entry. I restricted named user varible in 'Filter section' and user entry variable  was restricted in 'default values' section. I  used same restriction  in three queries and created a workbook with these three queries.
    I tried to refresh the workbook with specified WBS element. First time it is working fine , when I try to refresh workbook again  the user entry variable  is disappearing in the selection screen.
    any one help on this how to correct.
    Thanks,
    Madhu

    Hi Raj,
    Would suggest check the transformation for the records not being retrieved.
    With regard to 3 objects being displayed it is the Detail view for the transformation. There is a button in the Transformation view (2nd from right) "Switch detail view on/off". If you click that you would get just two objects
    if that makes the graphical view more clear with just hte source and the target objects.
    Hope it helps.
    Cheers
    Anurag

  • Filter Issue in 9.3.1

    Hi All,
    We are using 9.3.1 essbase. We have some issues with Filter.
    We have configured shared services.
    Can we assign multiple filters to a single user without using MAXL.
    Any help will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Glenn,
    Thanks for the quick reply.
    Appreciate if you could guide us further. The Steps we would follow are-
    1. Create users with provisioning in shared services
    2. Create a group say x and do the provisioning for the group.
    3. Create a filter with all provisioning as required.
    4. Assign a group with filter.
    Requirement.
    Assign multiple filters to a group. This is possible in shared services.
    The client has created multiple groups and multiple filters and is asking for the above requrement.
    Please let us know the steps.
    Thanks in advance.

  • Route Pattern/Filter Issues

    Hello - I had a question that I was hoping someone could help me with. I recently had an issue on CallManager 4.1.3sr6a. I have 10 sites, each using their own set of 6 9.@ route patterns for outgoing calls. Although the patterns are distinct, they all use the same route filters. Today, all of the sites began matching on the route pattern with the seven digit filter rather than matching on the long distance filter when a 91XXXXXXXXXX number was dialed (we tested with a number of numbers in different area codes). I wasn't able to input more digits after the 7th and DNA confirmed that it matched on the seven digit filter. The filters are as follows:
    Long Distance =(AREA-CODE EXISTS AND LONG-DISTANCE-DIRECT-DIAL EXISTS)
    SevenDigit = (LOCAL-AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND INTERNATIONAL-DIRECT-DIAL DOES-NOT-EXIST AND AREA-CODE DOES-NOT-EXIST AND SERVICE DOES-NOT-EXIST).
    I was able to resolve the issue by going to each site, removing the long distance 9.@ pattern and simply readding it (no changes were made to configuration).
    It was like it just stopped seeing all patterns using the long distance filter.
    I'm wondering if anyone is aware of a bug that may have caused this.
    Thanks very much!

    For detailed descriptions and examples, refer to the Understanding Route Pattern Wildcards and Special Characters section of Understanding Route Plans.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/admin/3_0_9/p1rtundr.html

  • Desktop Manager v 6.0 reconcilia​tion with PST files and outlook filter issues

    I just updated my desktop software and attached my BB Curve 8900 to sync and all the emails that I moved to PST folders are still in my main BB mailbox.  I try to keep email cleaned up so that I can see what emails are still needing action.  Previously they would be moved out of the BB mailbox into the folders when I connected (not wirelessly, unfortunately).  I need the mailboxes to reconcile like they used to with the previous desktop software.  Help?
    and I think unrelated, but also annoying:
    Prior to updating, emails that have a filter in Outlook to re-direct into a folder were all of a sudden appearing on my BB (previously they would go directly to the folder).  They are being filtered as there are a lot of them coming from an internal "facebook"-like community, so each group you subscribe to sends emails when people post.  I really don't want to see these on the BB.  I have Outlook 2007 and BES.  Any fixes?
    Thank you.

    Hi and Welcome to the Community!
    I can't find any public articles that seem to be on point to your situation...but you can search and perhaps have better results:
    http://btsc.webapps.blackberry.com/btsc/microsites​/microsite.do
    It may be that, rather than trying to change your current Desktop Software configuration, you might be better off starting over cleanly. To do so, I suggest this thread:
    http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Desktop-Sof​tware-for-PC/Cleanly-quot-Starting-Over-quot-with-​...
    It starts with a process for cleanly starting over, and there is some discussion, and there is also a post (15) with links to older Desktop Software versions, if those are needed. Note that this is not, by any means, guaranteed to work...but it has worked for many to resolve issues they are having.
    Good luck!
    Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
    If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
    Join our BBM Channels
    BSCF General Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Lov Mapping Issue

    Hi,
    I have an lov where i search an employee using employee number. With the help of these lov i bring inormation related to this employee say
    info1, info2, info3, info 4 and info5
    All these fields are mapped to message styled text on parent page.
    Now my issues is, when i click on the lov torch icon so as to search a new employee, it opens up the lov pop up window and clears all the fields related to my mapping for info1, info2, info3 except keeping info4 and info5. Ideally when i click on lov again, it should clear of all the fields which were avl on the page because of my previous search. I am not sure what causes this problem. Can anyone help me out.

    <lovMappings>
    <lovMap id="lovMap3" lovItem="EmployeeNumber" criteriaFrom="EmpNumber" resultTo="EmpNumber"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap4" lovItem="EmployeeName" resultTo="EmpName" criteriaFrom="EmpName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap5" lovItem="HrmName" resultTo="CurrHRM"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap6" lovItem="MgrName" resultTo="CurrMGR"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap7" lovItem="OrganizationName" resultTo="CurrOrg"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap8" lovItem="PuName" resultTo="CurrPU"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap9" lovItem="BusinessGroupName" resultTo="CurrBG"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap10" lovItem="EmpUserPersonType" resultTo="PersonType"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap11" resultTo="EmpPersonId" lovItem="EmployeePersonId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap12" resultTo="EmpNum" lovItem="EmployeeNumber"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap13" resultTo="CurrBGId" lovItem="BusinessGroupId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap14" resultTo="CurrOrgId" lovItem="OrganizationId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap15" resultTo="CurrMGREmpNum" lovItem="MgrEmployeeNumber"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap16" resultTo="CurrMGRPersonId" lovItem="MgrPersonId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap17" resultTo="CurrHRMEmpNum" lovItem="HrmEmployeeNumber"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap18" resultTo="CurrHRMPersonId" lovItem="HrmPersonId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap19" resultTo="CurrPUEmpNum" lovItem="PuEmployeeNumber"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap20" resultTo="CurrPUPersonId" lovItem="PuPersonId"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap34" resultTo="frmEmpName" lovItem="EmployeeName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap35" resultTo="frmCurrBG" lovItem="BusinessGroupName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap36" resultTo="frmCurrOrg" lovItem="OrganizationName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap37" resultTo="frmCurrMGR" lovItem="MgrName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap38" resultTo="frmCurrHRM" lovItem="HrmName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap39" resultTo="frmCurrPU" lovItem="PuName"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap44" lovItem="EmpUserPersonType" resultTo="frmPersonType"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap58" lovItem="IFG" resultTo="CurrIFG"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap59" lovItem="BS" resultTo="CurrBusSegment"/>
    <lovMap id="lovMap60" lovItem="SB" resultTo="CurrSubBusiness"/>
    </lovMappings>
    When i clear off the LOV item by putting new employee number and click the torch icon, it clears of all the fields on parent page except IFG, BS, SB.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Tags entered in code view don't show in design

    I searched a bit, but didn't find any mention of this problem from anyone else... I'm using Dreamweaver MX on OSX 10.2.8. For some reason, when I try to use the basic 120x240 pix text/image product link tags given in the Amazon Associate program, it

  • How to restore the Satellite L25 - where to get Recovery disk

    Hi.. I wanted to format my hard drive on my L25 laptop which currently has Win XP, but am not sure if I ever got a recovery CD/DVD from the person I bought it from. Does anyone know if this laptop (L25-s1192) would contain an image of the recovery di

  • Unknown structure ID 0 for flexfield code GL# with application ID 101

    Hi Experts, I am working on Report builder 6i, EBS 11i, and data base 9i. I have standard report, when i am running it, it's giving below error. ERROR: APP-FND-01016: Routine FDFRKS: Unknown structure ID 0 for flexfield code GL# with application ID 1

  • How do I get Picture in picture to work in iMovie 11?

    I have a sports video project I am working.  I created a "red arrow" .png file and added it to my project and selected picture in picture.  I can see the arrow in the viewer window to the right when I am editing it, but when I run the video, the orig

  • How to maintain SAP Release status in table COTPL

    Hi All, We have upgraded our system from ECC EHP4 TO ECC EHP 5. Now our SAP Release is 702 but in table COTPL still the SAP Release status is 701 becuase of which there is error in some of our sap jobs. Request you all to help us. How we can maintain