LR 5 - Image Sizing Dimensions - wrong image size

Hi,
Image Sizing Dimensions produces wrong image sizes upon export for certain images.
Example, I have export set up for iPad resolution, 2048x1536px at 264ppi. If I now export an 3264x4928px image it should be resized to 1356x2048px. What I get is 1356x2047 instead, one pixel too short on the long side. This doesn't happen for all images source resolutions and ratios though. I haven't figured out the pattern yet.
Here a link to an image which exports at wrong size (export dimension set to 2048x1536px).
http://www.bobtronic.com/files/IMG_0289.JPG
I would appreciate a speedy fix for this problem. Thanks
cheers,
Matthias

The image has a resolution of 3264x4928. Exporting using Dimension resizing of 2048x1536 results in an 2047x1536 image.
The scaling factor 4928 down to 2048, is 0.4155844155844156...
Assuming that LR is working to only 3 decimal places here, which indications discussed in another thread would suggest, then there are several ways to achieve that:
truncate down to 0.415 by discarding the subsequent digits
"quick-rounding" of the third digit by inspecting the fourth-place digit only, and incrementing the third-place digit when the fourth-place digit is larger than 5, which it is not in this case, resulting in 0.415
"math-rounding" by inspecting all of the following digit pairs in turn, until you reach a pair that is lower than 50, and then working back again to simplify. This procedure rounds 0.41558 up to 0.4156, then after doing that, rounds 0,4156 up to 0.416
Speculation: the difference between 0.415 and 0.416, is the difference between a result with 2047, and one with 2048, when executed.
Most of the time the "quick-round" procedure will work out fine, also truncating will usually be good enough, assuming the above has anything to do with the reality (which it may not). Just occasionally, though, there'll be an error in the final digit, compared with what the theoretically accurate procedure would have given. So if I am right this is not strictly speaking a bug (something failing to execute as it has been designed to do), but the result of a software design choice. "Works as designed", iow .
It seems that LR, perhaps differently between versions, is working this through by simple calculation (from the front-end), without comparing the back-end outcome against what you have requested. How much this (intermittent) issue actually matters, is a question of judgement, and of particular requirement.
[ alternative method: I find the Print module, outputting to JPG, is completely reliable when it comes to making a standardised JPG as to the dimensions, as well as offering some different technical and design options, than what you get with Export. For one thing, you get the option of on-the-fly cropping to shape, which you can then adjust interactively where (as here) the image is a different aspect than the Retina display. So if you want it, you can fill the screen instead of getting letterbox, all without having altered your main (Develop) crop for that image. Alternatively, if you don't want the Zoom to Fill option (e.g. with landscape images to be shown in portrait orientation as part of a sequence) you can still make all your images to the same dimension, but controlling the appearance of the borders that are left (which become part of the image) ]
RP
ps: AFAICT one would expect simple truncation to produce the appropriate answer half of the time; one would expect simple rounding to just one further digit, to be wrong half of the times when the following digit happened to be 5 - or to put in another way, to be right in 95% of cases; and proper rounding, examinng as many places as it takes, to be right 100% (within precision limits).

Similar Messages

  • Background image sizing for all screen sizes

    How do I make my background image conform to different size screens?  I had it set for my 27" monitor but it looked horrible on my laptop so I made it smaller and its still not fitting my laptop scree and it looks so small on my 27' now its horrible there.  Please help???

    Hello,
    I would suggest you to use this image as the browser fill.
    You can check the links about browser fill:
    Add an image to the background of the page or browser | Adobe Muse CC tutorials     Check from 2:00
    https://helpx.adobe.com/muse/using/using-fill-browser-fill-options.html
    Regards
    Vivek

  • PIxma Pro 100 - Lightroom Incorrect image sizing for select paper sizes

    I am trying to print from Lightroom to the Pixma Pro 100 using the A3+ Paper size (13"x19")  In Lightroom, the page and printer setups are all correct (verified by Adobe's Tech support) and in the Print Preview area, everything looks great and ready to print.
    Yet when I actually print the image to A3+ paper (and the image nearly fills the entire paper area) the resulting image is serverly cropped on the paper.  In fact is looks like it is cropping the image to 8.5x11, which obviously, only uses a portion of the 13x19 paper size.  It seems that Lighroom or the Canon Printer drivers are not respecting the selected paper size and defaulting to 8.5x11.
    Here is a link to an image of what the print out looks like:
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/mylwpsns0uvr4io/2013-05-20%2009.00.15.jpg
    This does not happen when printing from Print Studio Pro, nor from Photoshop itself.
    I've dealt with Adobe Tech support and Canon - both are point fingers at each other.  Meanwhile I am unable to print anything on larger paper sizes.
    The Pixma Pro is the only printer connected and I've re-installed drivers and checked for updates.  Still the same.  At this point, any comments on the situation would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!
    Bruce Johnson
    [email protected]
    Bruce Johnson
    [email protected]

    I am experiencing something like this as well.
    I do almost all my printing in A3+ and I do it all directly from LIghtroom. No problem til sometime this summer (post firmware update). Now whenever I set it up for 13 x 19 (and LR shows that it is 13 X 19) the finished print is actually 7.5 x 11 on the 13 x 19 in paper.
    Incredibly frustrating as I go through time, paper, ink, and tech support (at Canon and Adobe) trying to resolve this.
    Last week a Canon technician walked me through a complete reinstall of the printer and then it worked again. This week it's back to the same mess, and neither  a reinstallation of the printer today nor an update of my LR solfware resolved the problem.
    I learned today that I am able to print the correct size using Print Studio Pro, but I have never used it in the past and I'm reluctant to switch from the functional LR to Canon workflow I had going (where I knew how my printing specs would come out) 

  • Recommended image size and dimensions for images displayed on iPad retina?

    What are the recommended dpi image size and dimensions for images designed in DPS app as displayed on an iPad retina?

    Take a look at the following link:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/indesigndocs/2012/03/guidelines-for-creating-folios-for-ipad-3.html

  • Tecera A4 Wrong Image Size for Bios update....

    using the site tools to id the machine to bios...it led me to a file named...sm45v20.exe, which i downloaded & attempted to update the bios...via floppy / usb drive method.
    Done this with other machines (not this one) hundreds of times before...(fix a lot of friends machines...as this is). in the readme, it states this bios is for this string of machines...
    Tecra A4
    Tecra A4-S111TD
    Tecra A4-S211
    Tecra A4-S216
    Tecra A4-S231
    Tecra A4-S236
    Satellite M40-S417TD
    Satellite M45-S165
    Satellite M45-S1651
    Satellite M45-S265
    Satellite M45-S2651
    Satellite M45-S2652
    Satellite M45-S2653
    Satellite M45-S331
    Satellite M45-S3311
    Satellite M45-S351
    Satellite M45-S3511
    Satellite M45-S355
    Satellite M45-S3551
    where the tecera a4 is model I'm working on.
    However, when booting into the update, it goes through the startup....reads the existing rom image...then attempts to look at the disk version...and gives the wrong image size message. Usually, this means ether you've got the wrong bios image (hmmm...toshiba led me to it...so maybe it's wrong...but readme says it's ok) OR the download was corrupt. Re-Downed the entire set up file again (file name as mentioned above) and tried again. All disk work on my master workstation which is almost always correct. (except when it's not?)
    Any ideas? What the heck is the A4 anyway? Seems like a very rare model....
    <edit>...the ENTIRE model number as shown on the bottom label is:  PTA40U-1D701F   </edit>
    Message Edited by SetiRich on 04-16-2009 05:53 PM

    This is a maybe...
    Does the A4 in question have Intel video or ATI or nVidia?
    Looks like there are different BIOS files depending on the video chipset.

  • I'm using iphone 5 but its camera is not properly working. all the images i'm clicking are of dimension 600X800 and the size of the image is just 60-70 kb. now please tell me how to increase the dimension of images and its size.

    i'm using iphone 5 but its camera is not properly working. all the images i'm clicking are of dimension 600X800 and the size of the image is just 60-70 kb. now please tell me how to increase the dimension of images and its size.

    ''rojere [[#question-1055991|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    i try to keep my thumb palms off the mouse pad when i am typing but every now and then my screen resizes larger or smaller until i take my left palm off the keyboard base its only when my left palm is resting on the base next to the touch pad. i type pretty fast so it gets annoying and yes it also jumps screens or reverts back to previous message and i have to choose ctrl z to undo and get back to my message i was typing... it also switches tabs on me as well... not sure why my palm being on the left of the keypad on the base should effect anything but it does after a while. and i have to stop what i am doing...and go to the firefox menu and change the screen size back down to 100% sometimes it goes up to 200-300 other times it goes down to 70-80% i find it annoying i i wish there was a way to turn off the screen resize in the setup panel. if its just left to be 100% i am happy with that... i don't need it to be bigger or smaller... there should be a way to LOCK it down... i understand that there are people out there with eye problems and needs to have the screen size increase using the + or - but there should be a lock so it just stays no matter what is happening on my keypad or touch pad or base of the pad... that screen size will not increase or decrease. unless i turn off the lock... perhaps this is something they can implement in the next version or do a quick update of the browser
    </blockquote>
    sorry that is all greek to me thanks for attempting to explain what you were trying to explain sorry i just not tech person to be able to understand or where to begin ... have good day and thanks for again trying

  • Why are still images importing larger than their size?

    Per instructions in a thread I had here last week, I created all of my DVD still images at 720 x 534 pixels for Premiere Pro CS5.5. But when they are brought into a DVCPRO50 NTSC Standard sequence, they are being heavily clipped. The original in one example is this:
    But when that same images is brought into PP, it is sized up like this:
    It's still proportionally correct, but a lot of the top and bottom of the image are gone. The encoded MPEG-2 sequence and disk I've done as a test display just like that.
    Why is PP doing this, and how can I get it to use images built to the correct size to be used 1:1 in a sequence instead of being scaled to about 115% of size? Hate to compare this way, but this was never an issue with Final Cut Pro, which I'm switching from. Stills created to the size FCP needed of 720 x 540 displayed and finished exactly as they were made in Photoshop. The only image area lost was the normal bit of overscanning DVDs display at on your TV.

    I guess I don't understand.  This is an excerpt from the CS help.  This seems to be inconsistent with what the last two posts said.
    Composition settings presets for square-pixel equivalents of standard definition formats have changed as follows:
    format
    pixel dimensions in After Effects CS4 and later
    previous pixel dimensions
    NTSC D1 square-pixel equivalent
    720x534
    720x540
    NTSC D1 Widescreen square-pixel equivalent
    872x486
    864x486
    PAL D1/DV square-pixel equivalent
    788x576
    768x576
    PAL D1/DV Widescreen square-pixel equivalent
    1050x576
    1024x576

  • Lightroom 5.3 Image Sizing in export not working as expected

    When I export an image and specify the maximum dimensions in the Image Sizing section, Lightroom only honors the maximum width or height if both original dimensions are below the requested setting.
    For example, I have an image with original dimensions of 2592x1936.
    If I export using 1935x1935 in the Image Sizing section with option "Width & Height" or "Dimension", I get an exported file with dimensions 1935x1445. The "width" is properly constrained to the maximum value I've entered.
    However, if I export using 1937x1937, the resulting exported file has dimensions 2592x1936--the original size of the image.
    I've tried the same with an original image of 1936x2592 and get similar results.
    Am I not applying this setting correctly?

    There's cuurently a bug in the LR5.3 export process (been reported many times, and hopeful of a fix come 5.4). The bug is caused by having the "Don't Enlarge" option checked, so unchecking it will fix the problem. If unchecking it is a problem, see this thread for help:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/publish_service_harddisk_ignores_ima ge_sizing_resize_to_fit_short_edge_setting_when_source_image_is_a_dng_on_lightroom

  • Problem with Export - Image Sizing

    Hello, I'm running LR3 on a relatively new iMac.  I am using LR to edit RAW photos from my Nikon D700 and one of the things I do is export to .jpg to put some photos on my website.  To do this, each photo must be the same width and height, or it causes issues with the website.
    For awhile, I was exporting images at dimensions of 960x636 with no issues.  All of a sudden, when I use the export feature, and put in the Image Sizing section the 960x636 resolution, the exported file is at a resolution of 956x636 and therefore is not the same size as previously exported photos.  I've tried changing some of the settings in the Image Sizing section (check/uncheck Don't Enlarge, Dimensions vs. Width & Height, etc.) and nothing seems to work.  Any advice why LR3 is overriding my image size settings would be greatly appreciated.

    When you specify the width and height on export, you are specifying a "box" that Lightroom will fit the image into. It will do the best it can, but if your cropped image doesn't have the same aspect ratio as the "box", then one dimension will be short. As an example, if you had cropped your picture into a square, how could Lightroom possibly completely fill a rectangle with it?
    You need to crop your images to the same ratio as the 956 : 636 that you're specifying on Export.
    Hal

  • Image sizing frustration in Lightroom 5.6

    I need to export a jpeg "headshot" photo in the exact dimensions of width 1 2/3" X height 2" with 300dpi resolution.  When I select "export"... I see a "image sizing" section.  When I plug in the parameters... It only exports my original cropped photo.  What am I doing wrong?  Or what am I missing?

    You need to set the file format to JPG (not Original) in the Export dialog box

  • Export window: Image Sizing - "deselected": Resolution

    If I have Image Sizing "deselected" - does the inputted "Resolution" matter?
    I printed several photos and afterwards realized that I had "72 dpi" instead of 300 dpi.
    But I did not have Image Sizing selected - so does that box selection/deselection affect output resolution or not?
    Thank-you,

    The resolution is generally just a tag and quite meaningless. It hints at the final size of the image, but basically every application ignores the tag anyway and just displays the image at 1:1 on the screen or scaled down. It is only relevant to the export quality when you resize on export and specify a size in inches or cm. In that case your final image size will end up to be horizontal size(in)*ppi x vertical size(in)*ppi. If you specify a size in pixels, the tag is not used.
    See for example here, or here for more. 72 dpi is not used for anything anymore. Most displays are around 110 ppi, but even that is irrelevant. Just think as digital images by their dimension in pixels and ignore the ppi tag.

  • How do I make selective screenshot images in cells the same size?

    I am putting together a spreadsheet to list the purchasing options for our company from some of the Mac mini models but have a problem with image sizes in spreadsheet cells.
    First I took screenshots of each of the price and spec panels of the self-configured options I was interested in recommending using CmdCtrl+Shift4 to save the screenshot to the clipboard. Next, I highlighted the cell into which the image was destined to go and clicked Cmd+V and the image appeared in the cell (as an image fill for background colour). I repeated this process for six different Mac minis, being careful to start and finish the crosshairs in exactly the same place for each option. Each of these images had been lifted from a separate Tab in Safari 4.0.5 and appeared to be identically sized.
    The problem is, when placed in the spreadsheet cell grid, each image was either higher or lower than the one next to it, yet all cells were the exact same size. Some images appeared to be centred in the cell, others appeared to be top aligned.
    Can anyone help me to understand why this happens, and to give a suggestion on how to avoid it in the future?
    TIA

    OK, my mistake! The images were not the same size because the specs were different for each one, meaning that the info boxes were of different heights. When I copied them again, using the coordinates to ensure the screenshots were exactly the same size this time (rather than adding on a fixed width to the outside of the boxes) the problem was solved.
    Sometimes it's the user not the tools that has the problem!
    Having said that, it would be useful if the images were not background fills, but images that you could highlight because that would show quite quickly the size of each one - and allow you to add a background colour to a column to indicate a category type.
    Thanks for your help!

  • Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution)   Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

    Exporting photos for UHDTV or Native 4K TV, what are the best settings ? (File: Quality File: Color Space, Image Sizing and resolution)   Or in other words; How can I get the smallest files but keep good quality for display on new UHDTV

    You're welcome, and thank you for the reply.
    2) Yesterday I made the subclips with the In-Out Points and Command-U, the benefit is that I've seen the clip before naming it. Now I'm using markers, it's benefit is that I can write comment and (the later) clip name at once, the drawback is that I have to view to the next shot's beginning before knowing what the shot contains.
    But now I found out that I can reconnect my clips independently to the format I converted the master clip to. I reconnected the media to the original AVI file and it worked, too! The more I work with, the more I'm sold on it... - although it doesn't seem to be able to read and use the date information within the DV AVI.
    1) Ok, I tried something similar within FCE. Just worked, but the file size still remains. Which codec settings should I use? Is the export to DV in MOV with a quality of 75% acceptable for both file size and quality? Or would be encoding as H.264 with best quality an option for archiving, knowing that I have to convert it back to DV if I (maybe) wan't to use it for editing later? Or anything else?
    Thank's in advance again,
    André

  • Wrong image preview while I am moving adjustment sliders in Aperture

    When I move adjustment sliders, a different recently and previosly adjusted image will frequently show in the viewer while the slider is being moved.  Sometimes parts of two or more previous images will appear and sometimes in the wrong orientation. This makes it makes it impossible to see the result of the adjustment until I release the slider which is annoying.  I cannot reliably replicate the problem but it happens often.  It seems random as if the wrong image is in a cache and not refreshing properly.
    Details:
    MacPro (New) 6-core 32GB RAM, D300 Graphics OS X
    Aperture 3.5.1
    Moved Library from old machine (2007 MacPro) and rebuilt library
    250K images all referenced
    Library is big (236GB)
    Files are RAW Canon 5dMk3 and tend to be about 30MB
    Preferences:
    Import: standard previews
    Previews: generate automatically and share when quitting (half size medium quality)
    library created new previews for all images when I rebuilt it
    machine will run processor and memory hard, sometimes around 90%
    Might it be a poor choice of preference settings or a corrupt library?  Anyone else ever experience this condition?  I would appreciate any suggestions.

    On a conceptual level, it should not be a problem, but a Preview is related to a Version, and a Version is related to one Original/Master.  There can be multiple Versions, all of which must point to a single Original.
    You are not adjusting a Preview, but rather a Version.  What you see as you adjust is a new rendering of the Version, and is not the Preview you saw when you decided to adjust, I believe.
    There are on the order of 8 or 9 other files related to every Original even if only one Version in the Package that is the Library. Very complex indexing going on at all times.
    Please open an image, and before attempting to adjust, click on File, and choose Show in Finder -- is the Finder image the correct one?  And in the correct location?
    Now attempt to adjust.  Does the image change?  If so, again us Show in Finder and check.
    Ernie

  • Copying & pasting changes dimension of image if it is not 72 dpi

    I have Macs since the Mac 512ke. Never I had such a problem, that copying and pasting doesn't work correctly.
    I scan with 300 dpi grayscale. If I copy a selection of this scanned image and paste it to pages 4.0.3, the size of the image is enlarged.
    Only if I copy and paste images of 72 dpi, the size stays correct at the same dimension.
    If I copy and paste to word, it works.
    Any idea?
    Greetings from germany
    Robert

    clicking the buttom "original size" does nothing.
    Whether it does something or not will depend on the number of pixels in the original image, which is a function of the dimensions and resolution of the image. Thus an image that is 4x6 inches at a resolution of 72ppi would not change, while one that is 200ppi would enlarge dramatically. Not at all sure the button is actually all that useful.
    When I said to read the Help files, I meant those for Pages. Unlike the text editing programs you are used to, Pages does not handle image files in the same way. Because it is basically a page layout program, the expectation is that you bring an image in, and then size the image on the page to suit the layout you wish to have. You can use any size (in dimensions on the page) you want. For best printing results you would want a higher resolution image. Bring it into Pages, then resize it on the page to suit your purposes. You can later change the size on the page if you wish. As mentioned before you change the image by selecting it and either dragging the bounding box handles, or entering the dimensions you wish it to have in the boxes of the Metrics section of the Inspector.
    There is no bug in the OS or in Pages. You are just not understanding what Pages does. I repeat, it does NOT work the way you are expecting it to work. It works fine, just not the way you expect, because it is a different sort of program than you are used to. You need to learn how to use Pages. You can start here:
    http://www.apple.com/iwork/pages/
    You should have gotten a Pages User Guide in PDF form (anyway, I have one). You can also use the Pages Help function, and there is a user forum here in Apple Discussions:
    http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1302
    Use those resources to discover how it actually works.
    Francine
    Francine
    Schwieder

Maybe you are looking for

  • Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 5

    I am getting error: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 5 Pls tell me where I am wrong: import javax.swing.JOptionPane; import java.io.File; import java.io.*; import java.io.IOException; import java.util.*; class Test

  • Looking for a drawing app like Appleworks drawing to use with Yosemite

    Can someone tell me the name of a drawing application, similar to Appleworks Drawing, that can be used on OS 10.10 Yosemite?  I'd like to upgrade to Yosemite but it doesn't support Appleworks.

  • Sub Folder auto-creation in N82 images, whats the ...

    So I get a folder 200810 for October 08, but within it I get folders 200810A0,200810A1,200810A2,200810A3, etc. Anybody able to tell me why I get these folders, and/or what their formation is based on. It's not based on the numbers of fotos, so is it

  • Help, I just got OS 6 and I want OS 5 back.

    Hey I just got OS 6 and i dislike it, I am much more comfortable with OS 5, so I would like to downgrade back to it. Is this possible? I  really want my OS 5 back, so please help, thanks.

  • IPod Restore sticks at power adpater stage

    Hi. I've recently sold my ipod photo to a windows vista user... It was orginally formated for use on my Mac and was working fine. However the new owner has tryed to reset it to use on their system - but whilst the restore starts to work - when it get