Mail to be trigger for blocked vendors during F110 execution
Hi Experts,
We have blocked the vendors as per our requirement and while executing F110(4.6C version),it is ensuring that no payment is made to the respective vendors.Even we are able to see the blocked vendors in Exception log.
But as per my requirement there should be email to be trigerred picking up all the blocked vendors while executing the payment run F110.
We have created one variant to the program called "ZRFFOUS_C" by copying the "RFFOUS_C",and configured to one payment method called "I" at FBZP(country code level).
Details for variant are Company Code,Payment Method(A to Z),House Bank,Account ID,Check lot.
In that program at GET REGUH i am collecting all the vendor which comes for payment and seperating the blocked vendor in one table and trying to send mail
Now the mail is not triggered properly..
is it becoz we have done it a wrong way or some configurations needs to be done
we have tried sending email from SAP directly it is working fine
and more over we need to send the mail irrespective of bank account,lot number , account id considering we are about to create each and each variant for it. we have about 12 to 13 bank account so creating 12 programs will occupy lots of bytes is there any way to avoid this
please throw light on this
with regards
s.janagar
it is due to some configuration and not becoz of coding
Similar Messages
-
Is it possible to creat Shoppping cart for Blocked vendor in R/3
Hello all,
is it possible to create shopping cart for blocked vendor in R/3. we are using extended classic scenario with SRM 5.0. when i am trying to do this vendor is not visible in vendor list. Am i missing somthing???
if it is not possible in standard set up...what exactly i need to do.
my requirement is that i should create shopping cart and then PO for posting block vendor in R/3 ( i know that we can do it in R/3)
how to achieve this in SRM 5.0 please guide.
Thanks
Rupesh MundhadaThere are possibly three types of blocks for a vendor in R3
1. All company code are blocked for vendor
2. Selected company code is blocked for vendor
3. Vendor if blocked for the purchasing organization
But SRM allows only Central Locking and Purchasing Organizations level locking to be replicated from R3 - MM. So If the vendor is only blocked for a selected company code it will be still possible to create the shopping cart successfully, followed by purchase order; and PO will be issued to Vendor also; but it will not be replicated until and unless the block at the selected company code level is removed.
This is not wrong; though you will be able to change them as per your business need. The reason is Selected Company Code level block is only used by finance people to stop payment to vendors because of some reasons like exceeding the limit or anything else.
Please reward points if you find it useful. -
Prevent Third Party / Sales order stock for blocked vendors
Hi Experts.
We have scenarios for Third party processing and Sales order stock. We have a scenario of a fixed vendor for a material. The purchasing function frequently does block vendors for purchasing.
However, we find that this does not prevent creation of a third party / sales order stock item in the sales order and a PR is generated. It is only found during the PR --> PO conversion that the vendor is blocked at which time someone has to manually reject the line items.
Is there a way to prevent the system from being able to generate a PR for a blocked vendor ? I guess one possibility is to enhance the requirement routine for PR creation. Is there any other approach ?
Appreciate your help
Regards
Rohit ZalaniHi
In MK05, block vendor for all Purchasing org and Select Block Function = 03 Block quot. req., order, goods receipt
If you do this setting then user will get error message that "Vendor is blocked" and "Purchase requisition could not be generated for component". -
Purchase order is creating even for blocked vendors
Dear Friends,
FI guys have blocked the vendor for some reason.
But when we select the blocked vendor in PO creation screen (ME21n), it allows us to create the PO without showing any error message. Based on that, even it is allowing to create service entry sheet/GRN document number. Only during MIR7/MIRO invoice entering stage, it is showing the error message.
Could you please let me know how to resolve this issue at the PO creation stage itself - any sap note number/workaround procedure/providing any error message etc.,
Regards,
Dwarak.FI team might have blocked at company code level.
However it will allow you to make PO's but you cant make the payment against that vendor.
If you block it at PORG level you ll not be able to do the Po's anymore. -
Error in BDC program for Block vendor in SAP R/3
Hello friends,
I wrote a BDC program to block vendor using FK02.
When I debug the program in <b>No screen</b> mode
the program gives a error 'No batch input data for screen SAPMSSY3 0131.
But the screen name and screen number is not available in the program.
When I execute without debugging in No screen mode, the program works correctly.
When I run in ALL screen mode, the program works correctly and the program does not prompt for SAPMSSY3 0131 screen.
Is there any solution for this problem.check this
... MODE mode
Effect
The processing mode can take the following values:
'A' Display screen
'E' Display only if an error occurs
'N' Do not display
<b>'P' Do not display; debugging possible</b>
If the MODE addition is omitted, then the processing mode is 'A'.
If a screen is displayed in processing mode 'E' because the system reached the end of the BDC data, the system automatically switches to processing mode 'A'.
If breakpoints are set in a transaction tcod called using the CALL TRANSACTION tcod USING itab variant, these are not actually reached in 'N' mode. The system tries to insert data in the Debugger screen; the call ends with SY-SUBRC = 1001 and the message "Batch input data is not available for screen SAPMSSY3 0131" (S 00 344).
Conversely, in 'P' mode, transaction screens are processed in the background (as in 'N' mode) and debugging is possible.
Regards
Prabhu -
PO is creating for blocked vendor.
Hi Xperts,
I found a case where, we have a blocked vendor at pruchase organization, however the po is still creating for same vendor through automatic PO by ME59N. and not allowing to create PO manually through ME21N.
Please help....
Thanks in advanceHi,
please check once again from XK06
You need to select company code & purchasing Org and then under deletion flags select options as "all areas", Selected company code","selected Purchase Org".
Vendor should block for all company codes and for all purchase org.
Regards,
Sandesh Sawant -
Bank charges on Vendor invoices to be borne by Vendor during F110- How ?
Hi FICO Gurus,
I have a scenario as below.
While doing F110, for some vendors my client wants the bank charges(Wire/TT charges) to be deducted from the invoice amount.
For instance if I have to pay USD 1000 to ABC vendor, for the relevant wiretransfer/Telegraphic transfer say USD 10 is chaged by the bank. I need the bank to charge the amount from the vendor and pay them only USD 990 and take the USD10 towards their commission rather than charging it to my account.
Is there an indicator in the Vendor master or FBZP config with which I can achieve the above explained requirement ?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Dasaradh.R.BoreddyHi,
I assume we are talking about a DME-file sent to the bank. When using formats derived from MT101, you can specify in a tag who will bear the charges.
Example: W1SE Corporate e-Banking CASH MANAGEMENT SWIFT,
Tag:
:71A: M Details of Charges
This field specifies which party will bear the applicable charges for the subsequent transfer of funds.
Usage rules:
One of the following codes must be used:
BEN: All transaction charges, including the charges of the financial institution servicing the ordering customeru2019s
account, for the subsequent credit transfer are to be borne by the beneficiary customer.
OUR: All transaction charges for the subsequent credit transfer are to be borne by the ordering customer.
SHA: All transaction charges other than the charges of the financial institution servicing the ordering customer
account are borne by the beneficiary customer.
There will be similar rules in place regarding the DME exchange you do with your bank.
Hope this helps,
Kind regards,
Rudolf -
Payment advice for multiple vendors using F110
Hi all
I am facing problem while printing Multiple vendors payment advice using transaction F110.I am getting layout for first vendor only( using Tcode ). when I execute on via program I am getting below error.
"An unallowed overflow of the main window occurred"
how to solve this .pls provide the solution for this..
I am using Tcde : F110.
Program name : RFFOD__U .
waiting for Reply.i have used different payment run program
-
Create source list for blocked vendor
Hi all,
A client wants to create a source list for a material with a vendor that is blocked for purchase. (XK05, 'purchasing block' checked)
Is this something that can be done in configuration?
Thank you.Dear Eagle,
When Blocked for Purchasing, system wont allow to create Source List also below error message is throwing,i tried practically.
Not possible to generate any source list records
Message no. 06717
Diagnosis
The system was not able to determine any procurement information (i.e.
purchasing info records or outline purchase agreements) for the
material(s).
System Response
No source list records have been generated.
Procedure
If procurement information does exist for the material, check the
selection criteria you entered (e.g. material or plant number).
I know system wont allow to create source list also but you saying system allow,thats the reason i tried practically.
we canot do any funtions realted of procuring i mean combination of Purchasing organization.
may be your dout is this only
Prem -
Trigger for blocking user using third party tool !
Dear Friends ,
I have to block the users from using sqlplus, TOAD, PLsldev etc (Except SYSTEM user) from client end using the below trigger :
create or replace trigger check_logon
after logon on database
declare
cursor c_check is
select
sys_context('userenv','session_user')
username,
s.module,
s.program
from v$session s
where
sys_context('userenv','sessionid')=s.audsid;
lv_check c_check%rowtype;
begin
open c_check;
fetch c_check into lv_check;
if lv_check.username in ('SYSTEM')
then
null;
elsif upper(lv_check.module) like
('%SQL*PLUS%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%SQLPLUS%') or
upper(lv_check.module) like
('%T.O.A.D%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%TOAD%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%PLSQLDEV%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%BUSOBJ%') or
upper(lv_check.program) like
('%EXCEL%')
then
close c_check;
raise_application_error(-
20100,'Banned! Contact with Database Admin!');
end if;
close c_check;
end;
It works fine all normal user cannot access the database using above third party tools .
But the problem is , user with DBA privileges can access the database with generating an trace file . Is there any way to restrict DBA Privileged user ? or is there any mechanism to create a log/trace file so that If there any DBA Privilege user acess to the Database , then we can get the information from that specified log/trace file ?
Waiting your kind reply ... ...Hi,
If the DBA users has the DBA role granted to them so they will by passes the logon trigger. For example, the SYSTEM user has the DBA role and the DBA role has the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege. The ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER by pass the logon trigger. If you want to restrict the access to a DBA user, then you need to revoke the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege from the DBA role or grant individual privileges except the ADMINISTER DATABASE TRIGGER privilege to the DBA users.
Cheers
Legatti -
Payment of multiple invoices for a vendor using F110
Hi,
Vendor X has been assigned with payment method F. There are 2 invoices posted to this vendor. In the accounting document of these 2 posted invoices, the user explicitly assigned payment F on one invoice and left the other one with blank payment method assignment.
During payment run (F110) for payment method F, the system picked up the 2 invoices but listed them as two separate lines in the proposal list. When we process the payment the system also created two payment documents.
Is there a way for these 2 invoices to be processed as a single proposal and payment eventhough one has a payment method value assigned in the invoice and the other oen derived from the master data?
I have tried assigning both invoices with payment method F in the FI document and it works but we cannot sustain this procedure as we don't know when the user will manually assign payment method to the accounting documents.
Any suggestion how I can fuse these invoices together in a single proposal/payment document?
Thanks,
AloyThis is explained in paragraph 5. of OSS note 305414 - F110: Unintelligible grouping of documents.
This note is very helpful for understanding the grouping of documents in F110.
[https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1mciZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=305414] -
Two payment doc. for same Vendor in F110
Dear All,
In F110,the system is creating two payment documents for the same vendor with same payment method.
we have 3 open item(document) for this particular vendor,but the system is posting two payment document.
we have checked the Vendor master and FBZP payment method settings(Single payment is not selected in both),but how the system is posting two payment document for the 3 open invoice.
Do suggest.
Regards.Check the following fields in all the 3 invoices
They must be identical for 2 of them and different for 1
Paying company code
Sending company code
Account Number of Vendor or Creditor
Customer Number 1
Payee code
Currency Key
Payment Method
Short Key for a House Bank
ID for account details
Partner Bank Type
Business Area
Business Place
Indicator: Capital Goods Affected?
Grouping Field for Automatic Payments
Payment Method Supplement
Instruction key 1
Instruction key 2
Instruction key 3
Regards
Sach!n -
Credits are not set off against debits automatically for a vendor in F110
Hi
Our client wants to set off the debits with credits automatically in F110. Credits do not automatically show to be paid even if there are invoices to be paid for the same vendor.
Can somebody please help me on this.
Thanks,
LavanyaHi,
Do you able to find a solution for your requirement.
My business need is also similar to your. If you have got a workaround,can you kindly share it.
Regards, -
Number of New/Blocked Vendors
Hi All,
I need to do a query where i have to show just the number of new vendors and the number of blocked vendors whithin a certain period selected in the selection screen.
A vendor is considered as new if it has a creation date betwwen the dates selected on the selection criteria; a vendor is blocked if it as a blocked date between the dates in the selection criteria.
The creation date and block date are informed in the vendor master data infoobject.
Does anyone knows how to do this counters at query? To ssummarize , i need to count the number of vendors that have creation date and blocked date between the dates entered in the selection criteria.
Any hint would be welcome.
Thanks in advance.
NunoHi Sam,
I tried your suggestion, but i cannot execute the query without a KF. Then i tried to add a counter i have previous added to Vendor master data, but it doesn't work too...!
What i have made now was to add a counter always populated with 1 in the update rules of 0Vendor. In the query i made 2 Restricted KF's, for new and blocked vendors. The 1st with the counter KF and the creation date restricted to the dates in the selection screen and the 2nd with the counter and the blocked date restricted by the dayes in the selection criteria ( via user-exit).
The counter of new vendors works well but for blocked vendors not!!
What do you think about this scenario? I don't know what i'm missing,,,!
Thanks for your help,
Nuno -
Block Vendor for Goods Receipt without QM
Dear Experts,
We have a specific requirement to set a purchasing block in a vendor (XK05), which must necessarily include a block in goods receipt.
As far as I know, and according to SAP Note 64440 - MMIM: Block vendor for goods receipt, this is only possible activating QM for the material.
However, our client cannot do it for all the materials so we need to find out an alternative solution. Does anyone have any idea how can we do it?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
AndreiaHi guys,
Thank you very much for your quick replies!
Jürgen L, you are right. The requirement is not to block the GR forever, but just during a period of time, in specific situations.
AKTP MM, we will check the BADI: MB_MIGO_BADI, as suggested. I will come back with feedback, as soon as possible.
If you have more suggestions please feel free to share!
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Andreia
Maybe you are looking for
-
When clicking in a field to enter text (as in this text box), no visual indicator appears (i.e., blinking cursor) to let you know that you have accessed the field. In addition, when selecting text in the field, there is no indicator that you have sel
-
I have no idea what has changed but in our production environment but i recieve the following error when disabling a users DOBJ.GRP.USR_STATUS_ERROR The weird thing is that OIM actually disables all the provisioned resources although none of the Disa
-
Extensions Load Slow (Mac) After Latest Photoshop Update
I was wondering if anyone else has experienced the below: (On Mac - Mavericks) The latest Photoshop CC 2014 update has slowed down the loading of my two extension (these are extensions I have created in HTML5). Prior to the update they loaded fine. A
-
Stop default photo app opening when iPhone 3GS plugged in
I'm new to iPhone, but not to Macs. When I plug my 3GS into my MacBook, it auto-opens both iTunes and Canon Image Browser (which years ago I set as my default image capture app, because I prefer it to iPhoto). I don't want Image Browser to open every
-
I suddenly keep getting warning that my HD is running out of space. I should have at least a third of the HD free... Any idea what's happening? It never did it before. Also I keep repairing the permission and they have many errors... Thanks.