Manage historically tick in OAOA

Hi:
     I can see in OAOA that none of asset class configured in client system has Manage historically tick. I want to know what are the disadvantages of opening asset master data without manage historic tick. The F1 help does not clarify the concept a lot. Please guide.
Br

Hi,
Active history management has the following effects:
Set this indicator if you want the system to manage the asset with a history. Active history management has the following effects:
o   The asset is displayed in an asset chart.
o   The asset and the values/transactions belonging to it cannot be reorganized until the asset is deactivated.
So if you do not set the indicator,you can not manage the asset with a history as the above information.
regards Bernhard

Similar Messages

  • Manage historic tick in OAOA

    Dear All:
                  When SAP was impelemented in our company an asset class was opened which was later on blocked because assets of varying categories were being opned under that 1 class. At that perhaps they forgot to tick Manage historically tick in OAOA. Now the class is spare and i want to make a new class,for that class i want to use that blocked class,but problem i am having is that manage historic tick is disabled in it. Please guide me how to make this field editable and tick it.
    Regards

    Hi
    If you go to screen layout XXX you will notice that field group 82  
    (History indicator) is not ticked in the column "class" and therefore
    it is not available to be changed in tranz OAOA.                     
    Best Regards,
    Blaz

  • From Capital IO to AUC Manage Historically Field Mandatory How?

    When a Capital Internal Order is created an AUC asset is simultaneously created but under General Tab in that AUC asset which was created Manage Historically field is not ticked automatically.
    Every time we are forced to open those assets put tick mark manually.
    Is there any way out to have a tick in the ' Manage Historically' field automatically as soon as an Internal Order (Capital) is created. 
    Kindly provide detailed steps. 
    Thanks in advance.
    aravindpc

    Create a substitution to fill this field
    SPRO:
    Financial Accounting / Asset Accounting / Master Data / Define Substitution

  • Use of manage Historically in Assets

    Hi,
    There is one check box for Manage Historically in Asset Master REcord. Let me know the use of the same & what does it do ?
    I am running report for asset history.: S_ALR_87012075. It is empty.

    Hi,
    There is one check box for Manage Historically in Asset Master REcord. Let me know the use of the same & what does it do ?
    I am running report for asset history.: S_ALR_87012075. It is empty.

  • AS01, setting the option "manage historically" ... where to put the form?

    Hi all,
    creating an asset (AS01), setting the option "manage historically", SAP gives me the message
    "Asset class ATTREZZA is not yet assigned to a form"
    Where could I assign any forms in customizing?
    Thanks

    Hi
    Try SPRO - FA'g - Asset Accounting - Information System - Define or Assign Forms
    Thank You,

  • Managing historical data

    Hi all
    I have some historical data for some accounts(Share capital etc) for which I do no want to translate or calculate or do anything on it. I just want it to show up in my report and get consolidated.
    Do I proceed by creating a member list and identifying those accounts or is there any easier way to do so? Also, creating a static member list will be of no use since there might be more accounts later and everytime I have to add them to the list.
    Please let me know how to proceed.
    Regards,
    Ramith

    There are several different ways to do historical overrides (usually USD) depending on your metadata setup. One example would be to set up a new statistical account for each existing account you want to override. Then set up a new hierarchy in a custom dimension (typically the one with BS movements / Cash Flow / etc). In this hierarchy you can set up members such as HistUSDAdjs. You'll input the override amount in this new custom member in the new stat account. Then, you'll have some new rules which will copy the override amount to USD (and probably ending balance) in the Balance Sheet account. You'll also want to have a rule to copy the HistUSDAdj amount in the stat account over from the prior period so you only have to enter the override when it changes and not each month going forward.

  • Manage historical data that will be used in grouping by webforms/reports?

    Our system receives transactions in a per-minute basis, and each transaction is stored in a
    Raw Data table that's exclusively for this. All reports, gridview webforms, etc come from tables that are derived from this master table.
    In this case I can't group the data during run-time due to the volume of data. So for tasks like the daily summary, should I just have a job that runs once daily and groups all the data from the current day and inserts it into a historical daily table? The
    same thing with the weekly?
    I considered using BIDS and creating a cube, but due to the presentation of the data, it was beginning to look more complex. In other words, in order to show the desired result in a grid (plus include filters), I would need to use tons of MDX, which I still
    don't master.
    Thanks.
    VM

    I agree with kalman, this is the right way to deal with reporting and big tables, in most cases it is better to have 2 databases, one fore the original data, and one for the reporting which include this summarized data.
    Regarding the CUBE, this is a good option especially if your reports are more complex and includes several dimensions. on a simple case I don't think you should use CUBEs. But in order to make this dissension you need to understand the idea of using cube
    and the idea of dimensions:-) 
    * For most cases cube is just a nice and fast tool, that you can implement your self in another database, but in complex system it should give you a faster result. for simple system
    I will agree that no CUBE is needed probably.
      ** You should give us more information on your system if you want us to be more productive (number of users, database size and tables size, 1 transaction a sec... but what is it doing, what is the row size, and much more information... therefore we only
    can give you general gulden rules)
      Ronen Ariely
     [Personal Site]    [Blog]    [Facebook]

  • Manage History Indicator in Asset Master

    Hi,
    Could any one please tell
    what s the use of manage historically indicator
    what would happen is i have not ticked on it.
    Thanks
    Moderator: Press F1 on the field

    Hi,
    Asset is managed historically
    Set this indicator if you want the system to manage the asset with a history. Active history management has the following effects:
    The asset is displayed in an asset chart.
    The asset and the values/transactions belonging to it cannot be reorganized until the asset is deactivated.
    Regards
    udayakumar

  • Screen sharing and remote management no longer working after some uptime

    Server is withoiut monitor.
    Users need to login via screen sharing from time to time.
    "Enable screen sharing and remote management" is ticked in Server.app everything is working fine (for days, weeks).
    ARD reports "Screen Sharing Available", so remote management is not running how it should.
    Screen Sharing.app is "Connecting…" forever.
    Kickstarting ARD (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2370) does not help.
    Restart fixes it.
    Is there a workaround (over ssh) or a fix?

    seduc wrote:
    Do you know if
    fdesetup authrestart
    works then too?
    Off-hand, no.   I don't.  See this posting, or as would be typical in any case, try it?

  • Account type M& GL with open item managment not permitted error

    Hi
    We are getting the below error message while trying to do Goods reciepting using MIGO transaction.We have created new plants and done all assignments...
    Account type M&GL account with open item management not permitted....

    Hi
    GL code is assigned for GR/IR clearing account..But in fs00,for GL account/Company code,Open item management is ticked..Can u tell me how to remove the open item management.When i untick the open item management it gives an error message as below...
    (you want to switch off the open item management function
    retroactively for an account, you must first clear all the postings
    currently on this account. You cannot make any changes to the account
    management method until this is done.)
    Iam doing config in development server...In production server open item management is unticked

  • FB50L error: Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted

    Dear All
    I need your help.
    I am trying to do some adjustment to GR/IR clearing account in Non-leading ledger. Since for this account open item management is ticked, I am getting an error message 'Postings to G/L accounts with open item management are not permitted'.
    Now I have checked the forum to find some solution...but does not fit my requirement.
    I cannot create a new account. I cannot change the existing account. I tried OBA5, but the message persists.
    I also checked the notes.
    Appreciate a response on how the post to open item managed accounts in non-leading ledger.
    Regards
    Kunaal

    Hi Kunaal
    Usually, OIM accounts are not allowed for Non Leading Ledger postings... With EhP4 or 5, i guess, a new feature is added in GL Master whereby you can specify that a GL will be OIM for Leading Ledger and Not OIM for a Non Leading Ledger
    Regards
    Kavita Agarwal

  • F.05 doubt in Open Item and balance managed

    Hi,
    I noticed that we have the option to valuate open items and G/L balances for the same account number's in F.05
    If suppose, an open item managed account was entered and checked in both places (Open item and G/L balances), will the system do both? Since it can also take the balance of the account and give the difference or if SAP actually checks whether the option of open item managment is ticked in FS00 and decide to valuate it as open item.?

    Hi!
    If open item management is selected in G/L Master, SAP valuate open item only. It won't do both valuations.You can verify the same with F.05. If u selected open item management, and in F.05 u want to valuate account balance for the same GL, SAP won't valuate.

  • Definition of Asset Reorganization,eg Manage History flag in class define?

    Hello.
    The F1 help behind the "Manage Historically" flag in Asset Class definition states one of the effects is:"The asset and the values/transactions belonging to it cannot be reorganized until the asset is deactivated."
    What does "reorganized" refer to in this context?
    I've searched this forum, and there are references using the term but not including any reference to the definition. Googling variations on SAP/Asset/reorg has returned some great results, e.g. a 500+ page amazingly complete detail manual from SAP on fixed assets that I'm very happy to have found, but even that does not define the term in tht context of Fixed assets. Searching for the term in the document points to a page that simply states"For more information on archiving and reorganization of asset data, see Archiving in the R/3 System [Ext.]." So I've got it narrowed down to having something to do with archiving.
    So here's my specific question; At the highest possilble level,e.g. one or two sentences, can someone tell me what the term "Reorganization" refers to in this context?
    Any info would be appreciated.
    Thanks.

    Hello David,
    Whenever you're confronted with an issue of this sort, the first thing you have do to is to break the down the issue or definition.  Your main bone of contention is the word "Reorganization".
    In this instance, if I were you, I will take the this issue out of the realm of technicality or SAP and try to understand what the word "reorganize" means.
    "Reorganize" means to effect changes or organize something new.  Although "historically or history" means a written record or systematic record of events or accounts, SAP is saying, if you check "manage historically" in the asset master record, in order for you to reorganize the asset record, you would have to deactivate the check.
    Let's take a typical example:  Your company implemented IRFS standard IAS16 and therefore you need to make some changes to your property, plant and equipment which may also require changes to your depreciation expense, asset values as a result of new useful life etc.  You can't do any of this if you check manage history.  It does not however means you cannot post depreciation values.  What you cannot do though is make changes.
    If you ask in the asset accounting category forum the number of companies which have activated this check, I'm pretty sure you might not even get one.  We have fixed asset module activated at my company and we've never had this check activated.  And I did the whole config. from A to Z.
    Finally, it is good to play around the issue in your sandbox client and that will give you a better idea of the function.
    Regards,
    Elias

  • Batch Managed By-product / Scrap

    Dear Experts,
    I need your valuable inputs on the following issue:
    I am booking scrap during operation confirmation in T Code - CO11N. I have defianed the scrap material as by-product with Batch Management indicator ticked in master.
    I am posting the scrap to store location with Mvt type 531 in the "Post Goods Movement Tab" while confirmaing the operation. The batch number is getting generated here.
    The scrap (by-product) is not maintained in BOM, as it is umplanned scrap. The batch derivation is in place. The number range for batches is internal and automatically allocated.
    Issues:
    1. The batch classifiaction screen is not coming while goods movement of by-product. How to enable this?
    2. The batch data is not getting copied to the batch created for By-product. How to make it possible?
    Pls guide.
    Thanks & regards,
    Rohit.

    Note №85310 says that there is no batch classification in order confirmation.
    Symptom                                        
    There is no pop-window which will allow you to classify batches when performing an automatic goods receipt during confirmation of either a production or process order.                                        
    Other terms                                        
    Production order, CO11N, CO11, CO12, CO15, CO19, CO1F, CO1V
    Process order, COR6N, COR6, CORK, CORR, CORZ , EXIT_SAPMM07M_004 ,
    EXIT_SAPMM07M_003 , batch classification, confirmation,
    automatic goods receipt
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Because goods movements can be decoupled from confirmations and
    processed in background, it was decided that this functionality would
    not be implemented; therefore this is Standard R/3.
    Solution
    As a work around for this you have the following options:
    1. Classify your batch manually through Batch Master Maintenance.
    2. Turn off automatic goods receipt and classify your batch through the pop-up that is presented during MM goods receipt.
    3. Do not create your batch during Order Processing. Instead have the system create it during confirmation and at this time you will be able to classify your new batch from the Goods Movement screen COMPONENT>BATCH MANAGEMENT>CREATE BATCH.
    Note :
    If you want that your batch is classified in the background you can set in the transaction OMCV (classify batches within goods movement overview) that the classification is to happen in the background. You can then utilise the user exit EXIT_SAPMM07M_004 to valuate the characteristics if it is valid for
    your release.

  • Parallel developments - Version Management issue

    Hi all,
    My project is going into its enhancement phase and we intend to have a parallel development environment. Dev1 is for maintenance of the Production system, Dev2 for the new enhancement project.
    Dev 2 is a client copy of the QA1 environment, as the data there is cleaner than Dev1. Eventually, once the enhancement has gone live, Dev 2 will be the overall Dev system.
    My question: Version management is only stored in the source client, that is, Dev 1. How can we sync up the version management histories of Dev 1 and Dev 2. The client is concerned due to audit reasons.
    Thanks!

    Hi
    Here the client doesnt want to use Me9f for output of the message. So the issue is how to get the output done from me21n and get the version updated from Version"0" to Version"1".
    for this maintain the Message despatch time as 4 - Send immediately when saving the application Instead of 3 in the message condition record
    This will process the message once the PO is relased & saved
    Version managemnt is effective only if the existing messages are processed, if the message is not processed then version will not change in the PO.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

Maybe you are looking for

  • Graph which should display the data of a view object not visible

    Hi, I have a main page which contains a <af:panelAccordion> component with three <af:showDetailItem> components. Each of these <af:showDetailItem> components contain a page fragment. In each of these page fragments are a <af:table>, <dvt:pieGraph>, <

  • Noob Question: T400 Switchable Graphics?

    Just got my T400 this weekend, and I have a question about the switchable graphics feature. I can't actually find any way to control the switchable graphics.  I see the different battery life options and that type of thing, but is there anything that

  • Ipad2 digital av adapter no video signal out

    I connected my new ipad2 to my brand new Onkyo AV receiver TX-NR809 via the digital AV adapter. The ipad2 is not able to display a video anymore and the Onkyo is not able to route the video to my projector and there is no sound coming out of the AV r

  • Document Status -- Authorization group?

    Hi, I defined new status values for document in the IMG SolMan project. In addition, i created the document Status schemes with sequence number (Status values). The workflow sequence is working after testing in the Business Blueprint. The problem is,

  • Error ORA-02063, using DB LINK

    hi, i've created a DB_LINK from FINANCEIRA.WINXP.LAPTOP Database (_SERVER 01_) to FINANCEIRA.WINXP Database (_SERVER 02_). The fact is that i have an application connected at the FINANCEIRA.WINXP.LAPTOP side that makes SELECT and INSERT calls to FINA