Mapping issue for Idoc to xml

hello all,
       my scenario is idoc to xml file
E1EDKT1-------segment (1:n)
   -TDID----
ele
   -E1EDKT2----segment (1:n)
      -TDLINE-----ele
When TDID value is X then all values in TDLINE of undeline sement E1EDKT2 needs to be cocatenated and passed to target elemnt A
if  TDID value is Y then all values in TDLINE of undeline sement E1EDKT2 needs to be cocatenated and passed to target elemnt B
i have written java function(for all values in context) to conctenate TDLINE elements.
also the context of TDLINE is changed to  E1EDKT1.
i am getting all the concatenaed values of TDLINE for TDID=X in target element A but i am not geting any value in target element B for TDID=Y
can any one suggest what could be the problem.
Regards,
Sandip

Hi Sandip,
Map like this for target element A:
use simple if stament.  and for If give TDID  equals(text function) to constant X
and for then TDLINE-->concattdline(udf) --> output A
Map like this for target element B:
use simple if stament.  and for If give TDID  equals(text function) to constant Y
and for then TDLINE-->concattdline(udf) --> output B
concattdline udf:
Create a Context udf with one argument a and name it as concattdline.
Imports:  java.*;
Add this code:
//write your code here
String value = "";
for(int j=0; j<a.length - 1; j++){
     value += a[j] + "";
value +=  a[a.length - 1];
result.addValue(value);
I just tested this and it should work for you.
Regards,
---Satish

Similar Messages

  • Mapping Issue for IDoc to JDBC interface

    Hi All,
      I am having problem in implementing logic in IDoc to JDBC interface where I have to filter out E1WBB07-KSCHL = VKP0.
      Source IDoc structure is like ->
    E1WBB01(occ 0 -1000)
      |-> E1WBB03 (occ 0-100)
                |-> E1WBB07(occ 0-1000)
                         |-> KSCHL
                              DATAB
                              DATBI
    Now, For each KSCHL = VKA0 there should be a duplicate VKP0 record. From these 2 records only the VKA0 should get processed and VKP0 ignored.
    Duplicates for VKP0 and VKA0 can be identified by identical DATAB and DATBI.
    Suppose, in one  E1WBB03 segment,there are 4 E1WBB07 segment having following values.
    1: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=20102011, DATBI=25102011
    2: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
    3: KSCHL=VKA0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
    4: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=01112011, DATBI=31129999
    2 & 3 are duplicates. From these, 2 should get dropped.
    As a result only 1, 3 and 4 should get  processed.
    How can I proceed with this..?...I have tried some work around but not able to do it successfully. Is a UDF required to compare DATAB and DATBI. If yes how it can be written.?
    Thnx in advance,
    Praveen.

    chk below mapping:
    change the context of DATAB, DATAB1 and KSCHL to E1WBB03 (right click-> context) in all the mappings shown below
    1)
    DATAB
    ------------concat-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context---TargetNode
    DATBI
    2)
    DATAB
    ------------concat-----sortbykey \
    DATBI                    /        \
    KSCHL------------/                 \
    ----------------------------------------FormatByExample----sort-----UDF1----Target KSCHL
    DATAB                                    /
    ----concat---sort--splibyvalue(value change)-
    DATBI
    3)
    DATAB
    ---concat ( ; )-----sort-splibyvalue(value change)---collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF2---TargetDATAB
    DATBI
    4)
    DATAB
    ------------concat ( ; )-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF3---TargetDATABI
    DATBI
    UDF1: execution type : all values of a context...input: var1
    int a=var1.length;
    int count=0;
    if(a>=2)
    for(int i=0;i<a;i++)
    if(var1<i>.equals("VKA0"))
    count= count+1;
    else
    result.addValue(var1[0]);
    if(count>1)
    for(int i=0;i<count;i++)
    result.addValue("VKA0");
    UDF2:execution type: single value...input: var1
    String [] temp= var1.split(";");
    return temp[0];
    UDF3: execution type: single value...input: var1
    String [] temp= var1.split(";");
    return temp[1];

  • Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario

    mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
    source structure
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS = 1000
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS=  9000
    E1KNB1M
      BUKRS=  2000
    THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
    TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
    if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
    if BUKRS = 9000   THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
                   ELSE
                ISFRANCHISE=N
    I've done the mapping as below
    BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
    > ISFRANCHISE
    BUT everry time the target value is N only
    pl suggest
    rgds
    mojib

    mapped like this
    BUKRS--->SORT---->
                                                 EQUALS --------IF---THEN    Y
    9000------------------------>                                               ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
                                                                  ELSE   N
    context of BUKRS set to parent node
    its worked
    thanks to all for valuable suggestions
    rgds
    mojib

  • Mapping issue: FCC: Idoc for each record in file

    Hi,
    I have file to Idoc scenario.
    I receive csv file with multiple records.
    The requirement is to create an Idoc for each record.
    For eg.
    source file
    A1,B1,C1
    A2,B2,C2
    A3,B3,C3
    After FCC
    <MT>
    <TRANS>
    <ROW>
    <A>A1</A>
    <B>B1</B>
    <C>C1</C>
    </ROW>
    <ROW>
    <A>A2</A>
    <B>B2</B>
    <C>C2</C>
    </ROW>
    <ROW>
    <A>A3</A>
    <B>B3</B>
    <C>C3</C>
    </ROW>
    </TRANS>
    <MT>
    I have first tested it with only 1 record to test end to end connectivity. It works as expected and Idoc is posted to target system.
    Now when I am trying to send multiple records, I am getting some issues.
    Below are the steps that I have taken to process multiple records:
    1. Changed the cardinality of ROW (child of RecordSet) from 1 to Unbounded.
    2. Changed the occurance of Idoc to Unbounded.
    3. Mapped ROW to Idoc root.
    I have tested the mapping in IR and it generates multiple IDOCs.
    When I send the test file, it fails with error Tag found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=
    I can see the xml message created with multiple ROWs in XI by File adapter in sxmb_moni.
    When I do Test Configuration in ID, with the XML message extracted from sxmbmoni, the result that I got was:_
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"><ns0:Message1></ns0:Message1></ns0:Messages>
    This means that idoc was not created while mapping.
    But the same sample message works OK in IR!
    Pls help where I have missed.
    Regards,
    Anirudh.

    Sudhir,
    Thanks for your response.
    FCC is working fine. I have taken the XML message in XI created after FCC from csv sample message.
    I have tested this message in IR by placing it between
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
    </ns0:Message1>
    </ns0:Message>
    It is working fine and Idocs are created in mapping in IR.
    But the same sample message is creating below output ID!
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"><ns0:Message1></ns0:Message1></ns0:Messages>
    Regards,
    Anirudh.

  • ECC to CRM Mapping Issue for vendor data

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue for replicating vendor data from ECC to CRM. One of the vendor is not confirmed at ECC side and one vendor's time zone is not maintain in the master of time zone in CRM side. This may be the issue.
    But Where exact we can see that mapping of the tables of ECC and CRM. So in future we should maintain mandatory data based on mapping to avoid BDOC failure.

    Hello Rahul ,
    The field (MARA-BISMT) is not used in CRM system. If you want this
    field to be maintained in CRM as well, and to be transferred from R/3
    to CRM you must enhance the standard by customer extensions.
    The procedure for customer enhancements for Download from R/3
    to CRM is described in the following document:
    SAPNet, alias crm,   > Media Library   > Documentation   >
    Key Capabilities   > Master Data   > CRM Product: Customer
    Enhancements for Download/Upload
    For further information about Product Master enchancements and how to
    find techncical documentation about it please refer to the attached
    Note 428989.
    Thanks & regards,
    Krishnen

  • Mapping help for IDOC to file

    Hi Experts,
    I need help in mapping. All mapping is working fine. I am getting issue when mapping comment field to only BOX when it occurs multiple times.
    Actually I am getting correct lines in queue , but it is not mapping correctly, It consider lines from first MIXPLT.
    Target Structure:
    BOX                    0.n          Z1WHCUSTC   when Z1WHCONS is initial
    ++LIne                 0..n        Z1CUSTCD
    ++++Comment     0...n      Z1WHCMTH
    MIXPLT                0...n      Z1WHCONS
    BOX                     0..n       Z1WHCUSTC    when Z1WHCONS is not initial
    ++LIne                 0...n
    ++++Comment    0...n
    Source Structure:

    Hi Ranj,
    Did you import Idoc or Idoc xsd ?
    If you imported xsd, open external definition IDoc check for errors like below.
    I think the problem might be with source xml structure.
    Regards,
    Krupa

  • Mapping Issue for Synchronous interface

    Hi Experts,
    We are facing the below issue in a SOAP to RFC synchronous scenario.
    Data from WS is successfully uploaded to RFC via RFC request. However we face the below issue when the RFC response is received.
    com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException:Character reference &quot;&amp;#00&quot; is an invalid XML character.
    We receive this error particularly when one field has the below values.
    <FIELD> X 20140812201409101211 1 USD TP 00000000 </FIELD>
    When we click on view source the same field shows as below:
    <FIELD> &#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#12;X  20140812201409101211            1             USD     &#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#00;&#19;TP&#12;     00000000&#00;&#12;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#00;&#12;&#00;&#00;&#12;</FIELD>
    Even while pasting the same source xml from view source in Message Mapping we get the below error:
    Unable to display tree view; Error when parsing an XML document (Character reference "&#00" is an invalid XML character.)
    How is a simple value getting converted to some huge value when we open it using view source.
    Please help me resolving the same.
    Regards,
    Shai

    Hi Shaibayan
    looks like there is inconsistency in the RFC maintained in ECC to PI as non unicode.
    In RFC channel check the flag for Unicode.
    Or
    Write a java mapping to remove the special characters
    Regards
    Osman

  • Message mapping issue in idoc to jdbc scenario

    We have a scenario of  idoc->XI-JDBC
    the below given segment may get repeated , as shown below ,
    E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
       QUALF---003
       IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
    E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
       QUALF---003
       IDTNR---20500000000034(EAN No)
    Reqd mapping
    if QUALF=003
    THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN
    Now IDTNR has to be mapped with Bar_code_Number_EAN for the segment which comes last
    Pl suggest how to map using graphical mapping for the above scenario.

    Hi Raj ,
    The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one but if that gets repeated then the last value of IDTNR is getting populated in the target side, very clearly i m giving the source and target structure and the mapping done using the UDF
    Source structure
    E1EDP01
           E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
                  QUALF---002
                  IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
           E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
                  QUALF---003
                  IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
           E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
               QUALF---003
               IDTNR---20500000000030(EAN No)
    E1EDP01
         E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
                    QUALF---002
                    IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
         E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
                   QUALF---003
                   IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
          E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
                 QUALF---003
                 IDTNR---20500000000031(EAN No)
    E1EDP01
           E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
                   QUALF---002
                    IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
          E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
                  QUALF---003
                  IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
         E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
              QUALF---003
              IDTNR---20500000000032(EAN No)
    Target mapping
    if QUALF=002
    THEN IDTNR--->Article_No this is the direct mapping so , no issues
    if  QUALF=003
    THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN, now this IDTNR should get repeated every time  the segment  E1EDP01 gets repeated , currently only the last value form all the  IDTNR is coming to the target side.
    The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one
    Target structure
    Access1
    IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000030)
    Access2
    IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000031)
    Access3
    IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000032)
    Current mapping
    If QUALF = 003
                    Then  QUALF ---->
                                                     mapBarCodeEAN---->Bar_code_Num_EAN
    If QUALF = 003
                    Then  IDTNR ---->
    Context of QUALF is set to E1EDP01
    Context of IDTNR is set to  E1EDP01
    thanks for your personalised help
    rgds
    mojib
    Edited by: mohammad mojib ur rahman on Apr 9, 2010 1:30 PM

  • Mapping Problem in IDOC to XML scenario

    hi,
    In the target i have a tag which says:
    Extrinsic 0..unbounded
    name     required
    I have to map the above target to a source which comes from different IDOC segments.
    E.g.
    if E1EDP17.Qualf = '002' then map the E1EDP17.lktext to the "name"
    if E1EDP17.Qualf = '001' then map the E1EDP17.lktext to the Extrinisc.
    If data resides in other segments, how would i map those segments to the same output in xml.
    Example:
    <Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> this comes from E1EDP17 segment
    <Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> comes from segment A
    <Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> comes from segment B
    How can i use a single Target to map from different sources if they are in different segments?
    Any tips?
    Thanks,
    KP
    Message was edited by: Tirumal Kumar Pappu

    Tirumal,
    U will have to use comination of node functions like <b>exists</b> and <b>mapWithDefault</b>.
    Are you sure that, E1EDP17.Qualf will have the value '002' or '001'.
    There are some very good blogs on mapping by Sravya. Go through them and also go through the following link.
    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm">sap help for Mapping</a>
    Please reward if helpful

  • Mapping Issue: one IDoc to multiple IDocs concerning incoming segments

    Hi,
    i want to devide one incoming IDoc to two or more outgoing IDoc's of same type concerning the appearance of one segment.
    Incoming is:
       <IDOC BEGIN="">                   1...1
          <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
          </EDI_DC40>
          <..>
          <Z1MOV SEGMENT="">  0..99999
          </Z1MOV>
       </IDOC>
    Target should be:
    for each Z1MOV one IDOC.
       <IDOC BEGIN="">                   1...1
          <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
          </EDI_DC40>
          <..>
          <Z1MOV SEGMENT="">  0..1
          </Z1MOV>
       </IDOC>
    I already did the occurance change, like imported target IDoc with changed attribute maxOccurs="unbounded".
    I mapped the segment Z1MOV to IDOC but when Z1MOV occurs more than one time the target gets generated only one time. I changed the occurance of the IDoc to maxOccurs="unbounded".
    What do i have to do to make it run?!
    br

    Can someone help?
    When i switch to debug while testing message mapping i get following:
    Close tag
    Close tag
    Start tag
    Targetelement /ZIDOC/IDOC[2]/BEGIN kann nicht angelegt werden. Prüfen Sie, ob die XML-Instanz für die Ausgangs-XSD und die Zielfeldzuordnung die Anforderungen der Ziel-XSD erfüllt. Zielelement /ZIDOC/IDOC[2]/BEGIN kann nicht angelegt werden. Prüfen Sie, ob die XML-Instanz für die Ausgangs-XSD und die Zielfeldzuordnung die Anforderungen der Ziel-XSD erfüllt.
    I hope you can get the idea of this error because i can't tanslate.
    But the BEGIN is required for each message so how to get rid of it. This also concerns the SEGMENT-tag under each Segment of the IDoc.
    br

  • Mapping issue for condition must be  satisfied

    Hi All,
             I am using IDOC ORDERS05 for my interface IDOC to FILE,
    in which i have partner fuction as PARVW , in which i have to AG and LF
    i must must pouplate data if the from the IDOC PARTN if the  PARVW is AG to the VENDORCODE in my target
    i must must pouplate data if the from the IDOC PARTN if the  PARVW is LF to the BUYER in my target
    please help how to do it and what condition i must use for this '
    Thanking you
    Sridhar

    Hi,
    Since you are mapping them on the target side you can use your IDOC variables in multiple palces if you are mapping graphically.
    i.e. 1. VENDOR -> if PARVW is equal to AG then PARTN to VENDORCODE
         2. BUYER -> if PARVW is equal to LF then PARTN to BUYER
    Make sure you set the context for both PARVW & PARTN to its upper level parent & not the immediate level.
    for eg:
         IDOC
               ---E2EDKA1
                       ---PARVW
                      |
                       ---PARTN
    set it to IDOC & not E2EDKA1. if you still have doubts on context you can put your query  back...
    Thanks,
    venkatesh

  • Mapping problem for IDOC Type DESADV

    Dear all
    I need to change Segment E1EDP07 in the message type DESADV.
    I should concatenate VBELN and VGPOS into BSTNK.
    I tried to do this with BD79 (Rules for Data Converting). This seems not to work as I can get only 1 sender Field.
    So I tried to use the userexit EXIT_SAPLBD11_001, but it seems that this is not used. I have set a break-point for debugging and treated the IDOC with RSNAT00 without any stop.
    Do you have any ideas how I can do this?
    Herbert

    >
    Herbert Schlup wrote:
    > I have 2 entries for my DWSADV01
    >
    > 1 with FM IDOC_INPUT_DESADV and the other with IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1
    With the first one, you cannot do much, as there is no user exit in it. But in the second one, there is a user exit when the idoc data is parsed the exit name is EXIT_SAPLV55K_004 and is called in the subroutine  DESADV_IDOC_PARSE in the function.
    But please note that the function IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 is used with process code DELS for message type DESADV and Idoc type DELVRY01 and IDOC_INPUT_DESADV  is used with process code DESA and message type DESADV with IDoc type DESADV01.  So you might be using IDOC_INPUT_DESADV  function and unfortunately there are no user exits to handle your requirement.
    My advice would be to check with the source system or the middleware to define the mapping of these fields according to your requirement. But if that is not possible, then you need to first check which message type and IDoc type you are receiving and proceed accordingly
    KR,
    Advait

  • Mapping Issue: Target IDoc structure not getting created properly

    Hi Experts,
    I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
    For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as [SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true] and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as [1,2,3,4,5]. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as [1,2,3,4] but it gets values as [2,3,4,5] because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
    1. Target Structure:
        IDoc - No TMPN Node
        IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
        IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
        IDoc - 1 TMPN node
    Condition put on target TMPN_Node ---> (created only 4 times due to condition)
    2. Mapping Skeleton:
    Values coming from Q1 (SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true) --->
                                                                                    \===>FORMATBYEXAMPLE+SPLITBYVALUE==> TMPN-F0 [2]
                                                                                    /                                                                              TMPN-F0 [3]
    Values coming from Q2 (1,2,3,4,5) -
    >                                                                               TMPN-F0 [4]
                                                                                    TMPN-F0 [5]
    Where F0 is  the field which is created when TMPN Node is created. So, if TMPN gets created 6 times, the F0 gets created 6 times.
    Please let me know if there is an alternative to this problem. How can I have values as [1,2,3,4] in field F0 instead of [2,3,4,5]

    hi,
    i got the email.
    as i can see your mapping seams to be rigth, but there is sometrhing i dont get. in a previuos post you said:
    I am stuck with a strange problem in my mapping. It is a M:N scenario mapping where we have multiple IDocs in source as well as in target.
    For example, in source Queue-1 I am getting values as SUPPRESS, true, true, true, true and in the in source Queue-2 I am getting the values as 1,2,3,4,5. I used MapWithDefault function to match the number of values in both the queues but in the target IDoc the node (say TMPN) is created only 4 times because of the condition put at the target node. So, the target node should have values as 1,2,3,4 but it gets values as 2,3,4,5 because the first target TMPN node is not created in the first target IDoc. I can provide you with the skeleton of the map. Hope this will give you a fair idea. Let me know if you require more details.
    1. Target Structure:
    IDoc - No TMPN Node
    IDoc - 1 TMPN Node
    IDoc - 2 TMPN nodes
    IDoc - 1 TMPN node
    lets asume you define as default value "1"
    now, the result of the formatByExample taking the example you sent to me is:
    1,T1,T2,T3,T4 without context change. and the result of the function splitByValue should be what you are specting.
    but its something that is not clear still,
    could you post the result of the mapWithDefault? i think your problem is there.
    Rgds
    RP-.

  • Issue for IDOC while converting XI party for acks

    Hi all,
    I've setup a scneario IDOC to external company ( RNIF 1.1 adapter ) over XI. During my tests I get the error when the system sends back an acknowledgement 'Unable to convert sender XI party http://sap.com/xi/XI/XIParty/Party_one' to an IDoc partner.
    Why does the system tries to convert the 'Party_one' party to an IDOC partner ? What wold he try to update in sending system ?
    ( My outbound purchase order idoc has a 'LS' partner as sending IDOC partner and a 'LI/LF' as receiving idoc partner
    Any idea on where to add this mapping ?
    ( I have not setup any ALE audit acks, nor any specific Idoc channel for acks. Should I ? )
    Any ideas ?
    rgds
    Dirk

    Hi Dirk,
    You can block the ack using report  IDX_NOALE
    Regards
    Vijaya

  • How to find out back end mapping program for Idoc ?

    HI Experts,
    Iam new to ALE IIDOCS .. i have a issue in existing idoc .
    Some data maping problem is there in the existing idocs
    I need to find out back end program for this perticular idoc  no .
    Exactly where they have written the maping code  .
    How to find out this ?
    is there any preceedure to trace the back end program based on the idoc number .
    Regards
    RameshG

    Hi Ramesh,
    If you are looking at Inbound que then we generally double click on idoc go to control datat info and then take partner data info there
    Goto we20 check teh system and there double click the message type and there in inbound option double clik the porcess code it gives you one FM where you can see logic written to process that IDOC
    Regards,
    Poornima

Maybe you are looking for

  • Error when posting credit memo in current year

    Hi all,         When I am trying to do credit posting to an asset in current year it is giving me follwing error. Can someone help me what can be done. Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01 Message no. AA629 Asset affected: 0

  • Configurin alv in web dynpro

    Hi experts ,        i want to create alv in web dynpro , the structure of table which i want to display in alv is not fixed , so i want to set number of columns ,names of columns  at runtime , Please tell me how i can do this ?

  • My iphone has an issue at the bottom where the charger fits in and is unabvle to charge my iphone.  what may be causing this issue?

    My iphone 5c is unable to charge due to problems with the bottom where i insert the charger in order to charge the battery.  what maybe the reason that my iphone will not charge unless it is placed at pacific angles and will only charge on certain da

  • Uploads = blob vs filelocation

    This may not be necassariy be a Java question, but it's related to web services. I have made an application that works with uploaded images by storing the image filename inside a table in a database, this image can be retrieved from a file location o

  • TREX Configuration for BW or BI server.

    Hello Experts, I need to know the steps for configuring TREX for BI information (BI reports) published in KM content of the portal.. The solution should provide the indexing service for the report published.. Steps for Increased performance in search