Mapping Problem ORDERS Idoc to Edifact

Hi,
I have a mapping problem with the IDOC ORDERS:
I get the IDOC with several E1EDP01. Each E1EDP01 has several E1EDPT1, where i want only the first one (which I get over the TDID value). Each E1EDPT1 has min. 1 E1EDPT2.
Now I have to map each field TDLINE from first two E1EDPT2 of the first E1EDPT1 to the Edifact fields /LIST/S_UNB/S_UNH/G_SSG25/S_LIN/S_IMD[1]/C_C273/D_7008 (from the first E1EDPT2) and, if a second E1EDPT2 exists in /LIST/S_UNB/S_UNH/G_SSG25/S_LIN/S_IMD[1]/C_C273/D_7008_2.
I use following UDF:
//a = TDLINE
//b = Number of entry in the List
int pos =Integer.parseInt(b[0]);
if ( pos < a.length )
result.addValue(a[pos]);
else
result.addValue(ResultList.SUPPRESS);
Unfortunatly, I think becaus of the context problems (not every E1EDPT1 has two E1EDPT2), it's not working. Could somebody help me with this problem?
Thanks in advance
Dominic

Dear Dominic ,
I had same problem when I was trying to do the same thing for FTX segment.
Your UDF is fine but you don't need else condition.
//a = TDLINE
//b = Number of entry in the List
int pos =Integer.parseInt(b[0]);
if ( pos < a.length )
result.addValue(a[pos]);
for C_C273 assigned contant value and
D_7008 assigned TDLINE but change the context to E1EDPT1
and for D_7008_2
TDLINE(context to E1EDPT1 )
====>UDF====>D_7008_2
Contant(=1)
It should work becasue my map is working fine. If not let me know error message.
Thanks
Shubhankar

Similar Messages

EDI Mapping to ORDERS IDOC - urgent

Hi All,
My scenario is creation of sales orders in R/3 using inbound EDI messages.
Source is the Seeburger external definition(ORDERSV9)(Copied object into my name space) and the target message is the orders IDOC(R/3)(imported).
my question is: we have many segments and the feilds in the target message(IDOC). how will in know which feilds from source message are mapped to the correct feild in correct segment of the target message.
Please clarify as I'm stuck in Mapping?
Cheers,
Smith

Hi Liang,
I know the structure, feilds and the data in the feilds of the EDI structure. I just need to know to which target feilds in IDOC the respective source feilds are mapped to?
In target IDOC structure we have nearly 100 feilds and i'm not sure which feilds are to be mapped to create a sales order in R/3.
Fucntional consultants couldnt help much and are not completely aware where the data is posted in the sales order from the feilds in the idoc structure.
I'm waiting for any EDI experts to respond. Will see
Cheers,
Smith

Mandatory fields for mapping in ORDERS idoc.

Hi
I m working on File to idoc scenario for creation of sales order in ECC 6.0 , now I want to know what are the mandatory fields in ORDERS idoc which needs to be populated or else disbaled so that the sales order gets created properly in the ECC 6.0..
Pl let me know the method of finding mandatory field for mapping for any idoc and which fileds of idoc are to be disabled.
Pl help ..
ans will be rewarded .
thanks & rgds
mojib

HI,
U can disable the control record segment and in the IDOC adapter use the option apply control record from payload.
If you have set the Apply Control Record Values from Payload indicator in the receiver IDoc adapter, the following fields are filled from the IDoc-XML payload:
·        MESCOD
·        MESCFT
·        TEST
·        EXPRSS
·        STD
·        STDVRS
·        STDMES
·        SNDSAD
·        SNDLAD
·        RCVSAD
·        RCVLAD
·        REFINT
·        REFGRP
·        REFMES
·        STATUS
·        DIRECT
·        OUTMOD
·        CREDAT
·        CRETIM
read the information in below link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/ab/bdb13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
thnx,
chirag

Context Mapping Problem from IDoc to EDI

Hi,
I'm trying to map an IDoc to an EDI and I get this problem.
In my IDoc, I have segment E1ADRM1 (1:N)
My mapping condition is if E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = OSP then copy E1ADRM-REGION into x (EDI field)
So here is my problem:
In my IDoc test, the segment E1ADRM1 is repeated 6 times and the field REGION is not populated in all iterations so the wrong
REGION is being copied to my EDI field.
If I do a display queue on E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q, the value OSP is at the 5th position
AG
SP
VE
WE
OSP ***
OSO
If I do a display queue on E1ADRM-REGION, since only 5 segment E1ADRM have the field REGION populated, I get
KS
VA
KS
ON
VA
**(E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = SP do not have the RIGION populated so not showing in the IDoc)
So now, since E1ADRM-PARTNER_Q = OSP is at the 5th position, it is copying the 5th E1ADRM-REGION from the list but it should be the 4th.
How can I do that?
Rgds,
Yves

Hi,
For the mapping to work as you are expecting the queue should look like this(CC denotes context change)..
KS
CC
CC
VA
CC
KS
CC
ON
CC
VA
If you are not having the context changes, check at what level is field REGION at, right click on REGION in graphical mapping and choose menu item context, the 1st entry should have the tick mark(same should be for the PARTNER_Q field also).
Thanks,
Renjith.

Mapping Problem in IDOC to XML scenario

hi,
In the target i have a tag which says:
Extrinsic 0..unbounded
name required
I have to map the above target to a source which comes from different IDOC segments.
E.g.
if E1EDP17.Qualf = '002' then map the E1EDP17.lktext to the "name"
if E1EDP17.Qualf = '001' then map the E1EDP17.lktext to the Extrinisc.
If data resides in other segments, how would i map those segments to the same output in xml.
Example:
<Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> this comes from E1EDP17 segment
<Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> comes from segment A
<Extrinsic name="a">test</Extrinsic> -> comes from segment B
How can i use a single Target to map from different sources if they are in different segments?
Any tips?
Thanks,
KP
Message was edited by: Tirumal Kumar Pappu

Tirumal,
U will have to use comination of node functions like exists and mapWithDefault.
Are you sure that, E1EDP17.Qualf will have the value '002' or '001'.
There are some very good blogs on mapping by Sravya. Go through them and also go through the following link.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm">sap help for Mapping</a>
Please reward if helpful

Mapping Problem with IDOC HRMD_A05

Hi All,
When i am mapping source structure with IDOC HRMD_A05 i am getting Mapping not sufficiently defined...
The idoc is used to change the address of employee(infotype 0006)..
my source structure is
EMPADDR_MT
 EmpAddr1
 Trans_INFTY *
 Address1
 AddressType *
 PERNR *
 EFdate *
 Addr1 *
 Addr2 *
 ADDR4 *
 City *
 Country *
 state *
 Postalcode *
the fields to be mapped
So can any one help me out what r fields to be maintained for HRMD_A05...
Regards,
Sridhar
Message was edited by: sridhar reddy kondam

All the required fields & segments(shown red in mapping editor or min occurence:1) of idoc need to be mapped.If any of the fields are not available in your source for mapping..map those fields with empty constants using constant option of the mapping editor.

Mapping Problem. Idoc to file senerio...

Hi XI Gurus
I need a help.
I have an idoc.The output is papped to a file , this being a IDOC to File senerio. The Idoc contains segmnent1,2,3,4,5,6,7.The occurance of segment 7 is optional.It may come, it may not come. If segment 7 comes then there is a field callled mwskz which would contain 2 digits, say 'D1', or 'D2' or D3' or 'D4' or D5' or 'D6' or D7'or 'F8' or D9'. The file has a mapping, where there are 9 fields [ say F1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7, f8, and f9 ] in the ROOT. If at any instance, for a given segment 1, there is a segment7, then the contents of the fields MWSKZ is mapped based on it's content , say if the content ofnwskz is D6 then all fields from F1 - F9 would be populated by the constant term 'N' except for the field 'F6' which would contain 'Y'.
I have done a mapping, but it is failing...
I have used, remove contexts for the field as well as segment . I have use the function exists...but, after putting PAYLOASD, what I can see is, the mapping of the occurance of SEGMENT7 is not synchronised with field mwskz.
Experts Pls help.
Pls send me ur email address so that I can show u the screen-shots of the mapping !!!!
Many Thanks in Advance
Arnab
Please read the Forum's Rules of Engagement,
i.e.,
[/thread/117188 [original link is broken];
and refrain from using email correspondence as the main objective of the Forums is to share knowledge.
SDN PI/XI Forum Moderator

Hi Arnab,
If i have understood your requirement correctly, you need to duplicate your ROOT node which has fields f1.. f9 for 9 times and map it to a constant. Now you can provide the condition like this:
mwskz = D6-> createIf -> ROOT
and so on....
In the ROOT segment now you can directly map the fields f1 to f9 as per the requirement, i.e., f1 to f5 and f7 to f9 can be mapped to N directly and f6 can be mapped to Y.
Correct me if i have misunderstood your requirement.
Regards,
Sanjeev.

Mapping problem for IDOC Type DESADV

Dear all
I need to change Segment E1EDP07 in the message type DESADV.
I should concatenate VBELN and VGPOS into BSTNK.
I tried to do this with BD79 (Rules for Data Converting). This seems not to work as I can get only 1 sender Field.
So I tried to use the userexit EXIT_SAPLBD11_001, but it seems that this is not used. I have set a break-point for debugging and treated the IDOC with RSNAT00 without any stop.
Do you have any ideas how I can do this?
Herbert

>
Herbert Schlup wrote:
> I have 2 entries for my DWSADV01
>
> 1 with FM IDOC_INPUT_DESADV and the other with IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1
With the first one, you cannot do much, as there is no user exit in it. But in the second one, there is a user exit when the idoc data is parsed the exit name is EXIT_SAPLV55K_004 and is called in the subroutine DESADV_IDOC_PARSE in the function.
But please note that the function IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1 is used with process code DELS for message type DESADV and Idoc type DELVRY01 and IDOC_INPUT_DESADV is used with process code DESA and message type DESADV with IDoc type DESADV01. So you might be using IDOC_INPUT_DESADV function and unfortunately there are no user exits to handle your requirement.
My advice would be to check with the source system or the middleware to define the mapping of these fields according to your requirement. But if that is not possible, then you need to first check which message type and IDoc type you are receiving and proceed accordingly
KR,
Advait

Mapping problem in idoc

Hi
I had a source segment E1EDP20 (0---99 occurences), i need to pass a constant value to target field poitem.
the requirement is
on every occurence of E1EDP20, the constant value should be incremented by 1 and that constant should be passed to target field poitem.
Ex- on first occurence of E1EDP20 the constant value should be 1.
 on second occurence of E1EDP20 the constant value should be 2.
 on third occurence of E1EDP20 the constant value should be 3.
like this as long as on E1EDP20 occurs the constant value should be incremented by 1.
the constant should be passed to targetfield poitem.
pls suggest what is the logic should i write for the above requirement.
regards
raghu

If your requirement is to make the string length to 4 padding with 0's before, then try the below udf.
public static String Pad(String input, String padChar, int iLength, String sPadDir) {
 StringBuffer strBuf = new StringBuffer(input);
 String sTemp = "";
 int iInputLen = input.length();
 if (iInputLen >= iLength)
 return input;
 if (sPadDir.length() != 0) {
 if (sPadDir.equalsIgnoreCase("right")) {
 for (int j = 0; j < iLength - iInputLen; j++) {
 sTemp = strBuf.append(padChar).toString();
 } else if (sPadDir.equalsIgnoreCase("left")) {
 for (int h = 0; h < iLength - iInputLen; h++) {
 sTemp = strBuf.insert(h, padChar).toString();
 } else {
 sTemp = "Pad Direction Incorrect";
 } else {
 sTemp = "Pad Direction Does not exist";
 return sTemp;
constant value->UDF->Target
If you use the above UDF, you would get the output as 0xxx if your input is xxx,00xx for xx input,000x for x input.
Regards,
Swetha.

Complex IDOC mapping problem

Hello,
I'm stuck with a complex mapping issue that I can't figure out. I'm trying to pull 0..N Variant Configuration segments from the ORDERS IDOC and map it into a 0..N XML segment.
The inbound ORDERS IDOC is structured like this:
IDOC
...E1EDP01 (Item segment 0..N)
......E1EDP19 (Product data 0..5)
...........Z1EDPIT (Configuration Data 0..N)
.................ATUE1   (Description)
.................ZCODE   (Category)
.................RTWTB (Value)
Target XML:
Order
....Item (Item segment 0..N)
.......Product (Product data 0..1)
............VariantConfig (configuration data 0..N)
....................Description
....................Category
.....................Value
I need to create a new VariantConfig segment in my XML for every Z1EDPIT segment for that PO Item. But I need to skip any Z1EDPIT segments when ATUE1 = 'OPTIONS' or when ATUE1 does not exist.
The problem I'm running into is that my mapping is capable of creating the VariantConfig segment under those conditions but the following mappings used to create the Description/Category/Value are unable to skip the Z1EDPIT segments.
For example:
IDOC
...E1EDP01
......E1EDP19
...........Z1EDPIT
.................ZCODE     = REQT
.................RTWTB     = 5644
...........Z1EDPIT
.................ATUE1     = Finish
.................ZCODE    = REQT
.................RTWTB    = 7712
The output XML should read:
Order
....Item
.......Product
............VariantConfig
....................Description   = Finish
....................Category      = REQT
.....................Value          = 7712
So I determine to create the VariantConfig segment if ATUE1 exists and does not equal 'OPTIONS'. So my mapping creates one VariantConfig segment because the second Z1EDPIT qualifies. But each element within that node is reverting back to the first Z1EDPIT segment.
I thought the top of the Node (VariantConfig) would determine the context for the following fields. Therefore, when the 2nd Z1EDPIT segment generates the VariantConfig node then the elements should refer to the current context of the root node (VariantConfig).
What tools does PI's mapping provide to resolve a situation like this?
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Matt

Job,
Thanks, for the responses!
What do you mean by "add a context change for the fields".
Is there some mapping function to add a context change or is this a UDF I need to write to handle the context changes when ATUE1 is missing or equal to "OPTIONS".
In my example:
VariantConfig:
ATUE1 (E1EDP01) >mapWithDefault [OPTIONS] equatsS [OPTIONS] -> Not ->createIf->VariantConfig
Sub Element
Category
ATUE1 (E1EDP01) >mapWithDefault [OPTIONS] equatsS [OPTIONS] -> Not ->ifWithoutElse>ZCODE->Category
The problem is that this does not keep the ATUE1 and the ZCODE in the same Z1EDPIT segment. So I get the first ZCODE value when I only want the 2nd.   Even if I insert a context change I can't say for sure that next time I won't have 5 Z1EDPIT segments missing the ATUE1 segment before I find my first good segment that I need to map.
...confused...
Thanks,
Matt

Mapping iDoc to EDIFACT: Segment Count

Hi experts,
I am mapping a DELVRY05 iDoc to an EDIFACT DESADV document. Everythings fine so far, but I'm encountering troubles with filling the EDIFACT UNT Segment with the number of segments in the generated message.
I am using the OPI2 conversion module and so I get a nice xml structure for the EDIFACT message. Is there a way to count created xml nodes? I think this would solve my issue.
Thanks for your answers!

That is an example for the source idoc
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<DELVRY05>
 <IDOC BEGIN="1">
 <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
 <TABNAM>EDI_DC40</TABNAM>
 <MANDT>100</MANDT>
 <DOCNUM>0000000002603007</DOCNUM>
 <DOCREL>700</DOCREL>
 <STATUS>30</STATUS>
 <DIRECT>1</DIRECT>
 <OUTMOD>2</OUTMOD>
 <IDOCTYP>DELVRY05</IDOCTYP>
 <MESTYP>DESADV</MESTYP>
 <SNDPOR>SAPKTS</SNDPOR>
 <SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
 <SNDPRN>KTS100</SNDPRN>
 <RCVPOR>A000000016</RCVPOR>
 <RCVPRT>KU</RCVPRT>
 <RCVPFC>WE</RCVPFC>
 <RCVPRN>0004088156</RCVPRN>
 <CREDAT>20101123</CREDAT>
 <CRETIM>115322</CRETIM>
 <SERIAL>20101123115321</SERIAL>
 </EDI_DC40>
 <E1EDL20 SEGMENT="1">
 <VBELN>0080775647</VBELN>
 <VSTEL>0132</VSTEL>
 <VKORG>0130</VKORG>
 <LGNUM>132</LGNUM>
 <INCO1>EXW</INCO1>
 <INCO2>Leonding</INCO2>
 <ROUTE>009999</ROUTE>
 <VSBED>25</VSBED>
 <BTGEW>0.500</BTGEW>
 <NTGEW>0.500</NTGEW>
 <GEWEI>KGM</GEWEI>
 <VOLUM>0.000</VOLUM>
 <ANZPK>00000</ANZPK>
 <PODAT>20101123</PODAT>
 <POTIM>115321</POTIM>
 <E1EDL22 SEGMENT="1">
 <VSTEL_BEZ>Neuson Ersatzt.Linz II</VSTEL_BEZ>
 <VKORG_BEZ>Neuson Linz</VKORG_BEZ>
 <LGNUM_BEZ>LVS Neuson Linz Ersat. II</LGNUM_BEZ>
 <INCO1_BEZ>Ab Werk</INCO1_BEZ>
 <ROUTE_BEZ>NK Linz</ROUTE_BEZ>
 <VSBED_BEZ>Spedition</VSBED_BEZ>
 </E1EDL22>
 <E1EDL21 SEGMENT="1">
 <LFART>LF</LFART>
 <EXPKZ>X</EXPKZ>
 <LIFSK>10</LIFSK>
 <LPRIO>00</LPRIO>
 <KDGRP>02</KDGRP>
 <TRAGR>0100</TRAGR>
 <TRSPG>03</TRSPG>
 <E1EDL23 SEGMENT="1">
 <LFART_BEZ>Auslieferung</LFART_BEZ>
 <LIFSK_BEZ>zu verpacken</LIFSK_BEZ>
 <KDGRP_BEZ>Handel</KDGRP_BEZ>
 <TRAGR_BEZ>Transportgr. NK</TRAGR_BEZ>
 </E1EDL23>
 </E1EDL21>
 <E1EDL18 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>ORI</QUALF>
 </E1EDL18>
 <E1ADRM1 SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_Q>AG</PARTNER_Q>
 <PARTNER_ID>0004088156</PARTNER_ID>
 <LANGUAGE>EN</LANGUAGE>
 <FORMOFADDR>Firma</FORMOFADDR>
 <NAME1>Caterpillar Ltd.</NAME1>
 <STREET1>Peckleton Lane</STREET1>
 <POSTL_COD1>LE9 9JT</POSTL_COD1>
 <CITY1>Leicester</CITY1>
 <TELEPHONE1>14558258-00</TELEPHONE1>
 <COUNTRY1>GB</COUNTRY1>
 </E1ADRM1>
 <E1ADRM1 SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_Q>SP</PARTNER_Q>
 <PARTNER_ID>0006006873</PARTNER_ID>
 <LANGUAGE>DE</LANGUAGE>
 <NAME1>DHL Express</NAME1>
 <STREET1>BleibtreustraÃu0178e 2</STREET1>
 <POSTL_COD1>1110</POSTL_COD1>
 <CITY1>Wien</CITY1>
 <TELEPHONE1>1 76600-3286</TELEPHONE1>
 <TELEFAX>1 76600-3475</TELEFAX>
 <COUNTRY1>AT</COUNTRY1>
 <REGION>W</REGION>
 </E1ADRM1>
 <E1ADRM1 SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_Q>WE</PARTNER_Q>
 <PARTNER_ID>0004088156</PARTNER_ID>
 <LANGUAGE>EN</LANGUAGE>
 <FORMOFADDR>Firma</FORMOFADDR>
 <NAME1>Caterpillar Ltd.</NAME1>
 <STREET1>Peckleton Lane</STREET1>
 <POSTL_COD1>LE9 9JT</POSTL_COD1>
 <CITY1>Leicester</CITY1>
 <TELEPHONE1>14558258-00</TELEPHONE1>
 <COUNTRY1>GB</COUNTRY1>
 </E1ADRM1>
 <E1ADRM1 SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_Q>OSP</PARTNER_Q>
 <PARTNER_ID>0132</PARTNER_ID>
 <LANGUAGE>DE</LANGUAGE>
 <NAME1>Neuson Ersatzt. Linz II</NAME1>
 <COUNTRY1>AT</COUNTRY1>
 </E1ADRM1>
 <E1ADRM1 SEGMENT="1">
 <PARTNER_Q>OSO</PARTNER_Q>
 <PARTNER_ID>0130</PARTNER_ID>
 <LANGUAGE>DE</LANGUAGE>
 <COUNTRY1>AT</COUNTRY1>
 </E1ADRM1>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>006</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>003</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>001</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>007</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>010</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDT13 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>015</QUALF>
 <NTANF>20101123</NTANF>
 <NTANZ>000000</NTANZ>
 <NTEND>20101123</NTEND>
 <NTENZ>000000</NTENZ>
 <ISDD>00000000</ISDD>
 <ISDZ>000000</ISDZ>
 <IEDD>00000000</IEDD>
 <IEDZ>000000</IEDZ>
 </E1EDT13>
 <E1EDL33 SEGMENT="1">
 <ALAND>AT</ALAND>
 <EXPVZ>3</EXPVZ>
 <IEVER>3</IEVER>
 <E1EDL34 SEGMENT="1">
 <EXPVZ_BEZ>StraÃu0178enverkehr</EXPVZ_BEZ>
 <IEVER_BEZ>StraÃu0178enverkehr</IEVER_BEZ>
 </E1EDL34>
 </E1EDL33>
 <E1EDL28 SEGMENT="1">
 <ROUTE>009999</ROUTE>
 <ROUID>NK LINZ</ROUID>
 <DISTZ>0.000</DISTZ>
 <E1EDL29 SEGMENT="1">
 <ROUTE_BEZ>NK Linz</ROUTE_BEZ>
 </E1EDL29>
 </E1EDL28>
 <E1EDL24 SEGMENT="1">
 <POSNR>000010</POSNR>
 <MATNR>000000001000248477</MATNR>
 <MATWA>000000001000003928</MATWA>
 <ARKTX>PNEUMATIC SPRING</ARKTX>
 <ORKTX>Gasfeder 350N/L185/Hub64</ORKTX>
 <SUGRD>0001</SUGRD>
 <MATKL>000040900</MATKL>
 <WERKS>0131</WERKS>
 <LGORT>E002</LGORT>
 <LFIMG>1.000</LFIMG>
 <VRKME>ST</VRKME>
 <LGMNG>1.000</LGMNG>
 <MEINS>ST</MEINS>
 <NTGEW>0.500</NTGEW>
 <BRGEW>0.500</BRGEW>
 <GEWEI>KGM</GEWEI>
 <VOLUM>0.000</VOLUM>
 <LADGR>0131</LADGR>
 <TRAGR>0100</TRAGR>
 <VKBUR>0131</VKBUR>
 <VTWEG>02</VTWEG>
 <SPART>01</SPART>
 <GRKOR>000</GRKOR>
 <POSEX>000000</POSEX>
 <VFDAT>00000000</VFDAT>
 <EXPIRY_DATE_EXT>0</EXPIRY_DATE_EXT>
 <VGBEL>0001416863</VGBEL>
 <VGPOS>000020</VGPOS>
 <ORMNG> 1.000</ORMNG>
 <EXPIRY_DATE_EXT_B>0</EXPIRY_DATE_EXT_B>
 <E1EDL25 SEGMENT="1">
 <LGORT_BEZ>Ersatzteill. 02</LGORT_BEZ>
 <LADGR_BEZ>Neuson Ersatzteile</LADGR_BEZ>
 <TRAGR_BEZ>Transportgr. NK</TRAGR_BEZ>
 <VKBUR_BEZ>Neuson Ersatzteile</VKBUR_BEZ>
 <VTWEG_BEZ>NK Ersatzteile</VTWEG_BEZ>
 <SPART_BEZ>Produktsparte 01</SPART_BEZ>
 </E1EDL25>
 <E1EDL26 SEGMENT="1">
 <PSTYV>ZERS</PSTYV>
 <MATKL>000040900</MATKL>
 <PRODH>409</PRODH>
 <UMVKZ>1</UMVKZ>
 <UMVKN>1</UMVKN>
 <UEBTO>0.0</UEBTO>
 <UNTTO>0.0</UNTTO>
 <E1EDL27 SEGMENT="1">
 <PSTYV_BEZ>Normalpos Ersatzteil</PSTYV_BEZ>
 <MATKL_BEZ>Gasfeder</MATKL_BEZ>
 <PRODH_BEZ>Gasfeder</PRODH_BEZ>
 <WERKS_BEZ>Wacker Neuson Linz GmbH ET</WERKS_BEZ>
 </E1EDL27>
 </E1EDL26>
 <E1EDL35 SEGMENT="1">
 <STAWN>83024900</STAWN>
 <EXPRF>10000</EXPRF>
 <EXART>1</EXART>
 <HERKL>FR</HERKL>
 <GRWRT> 0.00</GRWRT>
 <E1EDL36 SEGMENT="1">
 <STXT1>BeschlÃ¤ge und Ã¤hnliche Waren, aus</STXT1>
 <STXT2>unedlen Metallen, fÃ¼r anderweit nicht</STXT2>
 <STXT3>genannte Zwecke (ausg. Scharniere, Lauf-</STXT3>
 <STXT4>rÃ¤dchen oder -rollen und BaubeschlÃ¤ge)</STXT4>
 <EXPRF_BEZ>Ausfuhr o. voran. zollr. Best.</EXPRF_BEZ>
 <EXART_BEZ>Kauf/Verkauf</EXART_BEZ>
 <HERKL_BEZ>Frankreich</HERKL_BEZ>
 </E1EDL36>
 </E1EDL35>
 <E1EDL43 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALF>C</QUALF>
 <BELNR>0001416863</BELNR>
 <POSNR>000020</POSNR>
 <DATUM>20101123</DATUM>
 </E1EDL43>
 <E1EDL41 SEGMENT="1">
 <QUALI>001</QUALI>
 <BSTNR>TEST FAH</BSTNR>
 <BSTDT>20101123</BSTDT>
 </E1EDL41>
 </E1EDL24>
 </E1EDL20>
 </IDOC>
</DELVRY05>
and thats what for the moment is the output for the EDIFACT before OPI2 conversion module. UNT segment count is hardcoded set to 1.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:EDIFACTMessage xmlns:ns0="http://cbsgmbh.com/xi/EDIFACT/99A">
 <Header>
 <SenderID>Test_SenderSystem</SenderID>
 <ReceiverID>Test_ReceiverSystem</ReceiverID>
 <MessageType>EDIFACTMessage</MessageType>
 </Header>
 <ListOfDespatchAdvises>
 <DespatchAdvise>
 <HEADING>
 <UNH>
 <UNH01>0000000002603007</UNH01>
 <UNH02>
 <S00901>DESADV</S00901>
 <S00902>D</S00902>
 <S00903>98B</S00903>
 <S00904>UN</S00904>
 </UNH02>
 </UNH>
 <BGM>
 <BGM01>
 <C00201>351</C00201>
 </BGM01>
 <BGM02>
 <C10601>0000000002603007</C10601>
 </BGM02>
 <BGM03>9</BGM03>
 </BGM>
 <DTM>
 <DTM01>
 <C50701>11</C50701>
 <C50702>00201011230000</C50702>
 </DTM01>
 </DTM>
 <DTM>
 <DTM01>
 <C50701>132</C50701>
 <C50702>00201011230000</C50702>
 </DTM01>
 </DTM>
 <DTM>
 <DTM01>
 <C50701>137</C50701>
 <C50702>00201011230000</C50702>
 </DTM01>
 </DTM>
 <MEA>
 <MEA01>PD</MEA01>
 <MEA02>
 <C50201>G</C50201>
 </MEA02>
 <MEA03>
 <C17401>KGM</C17401>
 <C17402>0.500</C17402>
 </MEA03>
 </MEA>
 <MEA>
 <MEA01>PD</MEA01>
 <MEA02>
 <C50201>N</C50201>
 </MEA02>
 <MEA03>
 <C17401>KGM</C17401>
 <C17402>0.500</C17402>
 </MEA03>
 </MEA>
 <MEA>
 <MEA01>PD</MEA01>
 <MEA02>
 <C50201>WT</C50201>
 </MEA02>
 <MEA03>
 <C17401>KGM</C17401>
 <C17402>0.500</C17402>
 </MEA03>
 </MEA>
 </HEADING>
 <DETAIL>
 <CPS>
 <CPS01>1</CPS01>
 <CPS03>3</CPS03>
 </CPS>
 <SG16>
 <LIN>
 <LIN02>000010</LIN02>
 </LIN>
 <PIA>
 <PIA01>1</PIA01>
 <PIA02>
 <C21201>0001416863</C21201>
 <C21202>PO</C21202>
 </PIA02>
 </PIA>
 <PIA>
 <PIA01>1</PIA01>
 <PIA02>
 <C21201>000020</C21201>
 <C21202>PL</C21202>
 </PIA02>
 </PIA>
 <PIA>
 <PIA01>1</PIA01>
 <PIA02>
 <C21201>TEST FAH</C21201>
 <C21202>ON</C21202>
 </PIA02>
 </PIA>
 </SG16>
 </DETAIL>
 <SUMMARY>
 <UNT>
 <UNT01>1</UNT01>
 <UNT02>0000000002603007</UNT02>
 </UNT>
 </SUMMARY>
 </DespatchAdvise>
 </ListOfDespatchAdvises>
</ns0:EDIFACTMessage>

Order and map problems

i have a user defined type which in essence works great. however if i try to run a sub query i get the message
ORA-22950: cannot ORDER objects without MAP or ORDER method
which i assume happens because i have not ordered my user defined type in any way, thus
what is the command to order the type definition

Marcus,
I am curious of your application. Why only one user-defined type? Here is how to remedy your problem,
1. The error measnt:
ORA-22950 cannot ORDER objects without MAP or ORDER method
Cause: An object type must have a MAP or ORDER method defined for all comparisons other than equality and inequality comparisons.
Action: Define a MAP or ORDER method for the object type.
2. Check out the documentation at http://download-west.oracle.com/otndoc/oracle9i/901_doc/appdev.901/a88878/adobjbas.htm#459409 to learn more about ORDER and MAP methods.
Regards,
Geoff

Problem in orders idoc

Dear xperts,
There were some orders idoc for a company where the company name is being changes by some buddy.
i:e In stead if NAME1 it is displaying NAME2 now from t001w table.
I have to find out where it is being changes and who has done the changes.
as i am new to idoc please give me some idea how to fins it out.

Hi Manoj,
Check the Inbound/Outbound Function module/Program which is used to create your Orders Idoc.
If it is Standard one, then they might have written any user exit to change the values while creating the Idoc.
Regards,
Ashok

JDBC to IDoc Mapping Problem

Hello,
I have a connection going from a SQL (via a JDBC connection), mapping into an IDOC. Connections all work, but for some reason when I turn on the communication channel to pull from the database through a SELECT statement, I only get the header of the Idoc (below). I have tried many different things and cannot see why the mapping does not seem to be working. When I load the test data as a test instance in the mapping, it works. Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<CRMXIF_PRODUCT_MATERIAL_SAVE01 />

Hi,
Document Name
The document name is inserted in the message as the main XML tag. The default value is resultset.
Document Namespace
The namespace is added to the document name.
See the example below
The system converts the table resulting from the query SQL statement into a valid XML document and sends it to the Integration Engine. The document looks like this:
<resultset>
<row>
<column-name1>column-value</ column-name1>
<column-name2>column-value</ column-name2>
<column-name3>column-value</ column-name3>
</row>
<row>
<column-name1>column-value</ column-name1>
<column-name2>column-value</ column-name2>
<column-name3>column-value</ column-name3>
</row>
</resultset>
Regards
Chilla..

How to transfer sales order idoc from R/3 to CRM

Hi,
I want to generate the sales order idoc in R/3 (ORDERS) and replicates to CRM through XIF adapter.
The sales documents are not realy existing in R/3. We can only get the information from related biling documents and try to gerenate ORDERS idoc.
The problem is how to map R/3 idoc to CRM idoc(CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE_M01). The administration console seems can only send the idocs but not receiving them.
Thanks,
Ina

Hello Yina,
Can you please answer the questions? I am a little bit confused.
If you don't have the order in R/3, are you not going to create one when creating the ORDERS IDoc? If yes, then this order will go to CRM automatically if you have the middleware set properly.
If you are NOT creating any order in R/3 during the IDoc step, Why would you want the order in CRM when you don't have it in R/3?
Are you not going to keep the middleware between R/3 and CRM open? If you keep it open, the order from CRM will crossover to R/3 - in which case you could have created the order in R/3 in the first step itself !!!
If you are not keeping the middleware open between R/3 and CRM - I don't know why would you want to keep the orders in CRM, but not in R/3. Is it because of lack of good CRM consultants in the project?
Easwar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com

Mapping Problem ORDERS Idoc to Edifact

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for