Master data Issue --- materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue that the Customer Data is missing in a BEx Report.
Data Flow is 2LIS_13_VDITM --> DSO1 --> Merging DSO --> Cube --> Multiprovider --> Bex Report.
Exact issue is Customers in the Bex Report has unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District.
The only reason a customer should show up under u201Cunassignedu201D or u201C#u201D is if itu2019s improperly set up in the system.
customers are assigned with two values. one which has data and the other which has unassigned value.
I wanted to know, how do i check if the matierials are valid to have unassigned Values ?
Checked the Merging DSO and saw that there are actually values assigned values for the affected matierials.
After that checked the Cube data values are displayed except the Master Data values.
I guess..its completely related to Master data. I would like to know how can i resolve this issue.
Please reply me if you face this kind of master data issue in your expeiriance.
Thanks,
SN.

Hi,
Are Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District are attributes of Customer?
In case they are, then the customers will be unassigned to Sales Office, Sales Group, Sales District in case the data for these attributes is loaded to the customer attributes.
and also check if the customer characteristic is properly assigned in the multiprovider.
Check if it helps.
Regards,
Joe

Similar Messages

QM Master data issue

Dear all,
We want to begin using the INPUT PROCEDURE addin in our QM module, we already have customized this addin but now we are facing a master data issue, that is, when we update the inspection characteristics master data, the actual inspection plans do not take this changes into account.
My first question is: Is there any way to force the actual inspection plans to be updated with the actual inspections characteristics parameters ?
In particular, we want to force the option 'Input processing' in the control indicator, and the Input processing value in the Quant. Data.
Alternatively, is there any way to mass update this informations directly at inspection plan-characteristic level ?
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
I followed this steps, actually already had the 'Replace master insp. characteristics' indicator set, however, when I do changes in a MIC, either creating a new version or not, the system does not show the list of where used plans.
Maybe is there further customizations ?
Thanks a lot!

WM Material Master Data - extend materials inquiry

I have a question regarding WM Material Master Data - extend materials
what is the best practice for extending materials to Warehouse Management views 1 and 2. We have 1 new warehouse with fixed bins 001 Pallet, 002 Racking, 003 Floor, 004 Bins, 005 Chemicals, 099 Quarantine. My question is should we extend 3000 materials to each of the designated fixed bins to the Plant/Warehouse Number/Storage Type for WM views 1 & 2?
Thanks,

Hi
As suggested by Raj you can use Mass maintenance option MM17 to update the WM1 and WM2 view
or
You can use the LSMW option to upload from external file (e.g. xls, CSV files)
Regards
Manish Kumar

What is the SAFEST SEQUENCE to convert from a Outlook/iPad/iPhone synced with MobileMe to syncing with iCloud (I have 10 years of calendar diary events and 3000 contacts) - I am worried about the data issues that have been posted about iCloud.

What is the SAFEST SEQUENCE to convert from a Outlook/iPad/iPhone synced with MobileMe to syncing with iCloud (I have 10 years of calendar diary events and 3000 contacts) - I am worried about the data issues that have been posted about iCloud.
This has worked fine with MobileMe with only a couple of minor glitches in the past.
Any experience doing this the "right" way?

The warranty entitles you to complimentary phone support for the first 90 days of ownership.

How to delete master data of materials from sap tables

how to delete master data of materials from sap tables...its needed now.
i know its not recommended but still we need to do this. give me the best possible approach.
regards,
suneetha

Hi,
I would suggest you not to write your own code to delete the entries.
BAPI_MATERIAL_DELETE, this would mark all materials selected for deletion. But still the material would exist in SAP.
Another solution: Delete a material manually and in another session execute the transaction SM04. This would display the tables which get locked when you do the operation, Then you can write your own code to delete the material numbers from all the related tables.
Regards
Subramanian

Master Data Issue

Hi BW Guru's,
I have an issue with standard master data data source in BW system. In R/3 side they have done modifications for the existing strucuture and based on the modification they want to see the values but where as when we load data the values are not getting (Daily we will load master data through process chains). And the strange thing is when we do full load manually with the same info source the values will be uploaded. and the users can see the values.
The data source is 0CUST_COMPC and the modification that they have done remapping of Customers to the salesrep and this will show an impact on the Collector.In BW we are facing the following issue that the change of collector is not updated in BW
why is this field not considered into the deltas....?
Is there any OSS note which support to pull this field in to BW please suggest me.
can any one help me on this issue. Your help will be appreciated in advance.
Thanks,
Ganni

Dear Venkat,
Once you have Added the New Fields in BW Side, You have to Reinitialize the Delta .
And I dont think the master data would be very frequently changing as the data comes from KNB1 , so may be this is the result the delta is not coming for those fields, But You have Reinit again to get deltas working properly after enhancing KNB1.
Hope it helps..
Thanks,
Krish

Time dependant Master data issue

Dear Experts,
I have a master data object 0DF_HRPOSTN which is time denpendant in that a position will have validity dates like when its first loaded as below
BI
Pos1001 01.01.1000 to 31.12.9999
later from source system this position validity might be ended like
pos1001 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2010
the problem is the infoobject is having key as position and end to date now even though this position validity is changed to 31.12.2010 BI is still holding the reocrd 31.12.9999 which is creating lot of issues, what can i do to rectify.
Thanks and Regards
Neel

Hi Diogo & Mark,
Actually the issue is see for example
John--Manager-- 01.01.1000 to 31.12.2009
John----
Sr Manger -
01.04.2009 to 31.12.2010
John -
Sr Manager-----01.04.2010 to 31.12.9999
Here John is no more in company so his position is stopped but as per standard BI now also has the thrid record
So when i want to select all the people who are active then i will get even john positions becuase condition will be like End to date
Greater than system date
I think that when we want to stop a positions validity then its should not get another entry ending to 31.12.9999.
So kindly help me selecting right records in my transformation and reports
Thanks and Regads
Neel

Incorrect Master Data Issue

Hi
We have incorrect master data in 0CUST_SALE object. It is due to some of the enhancements done in the Update/transfer rules. Because of this, we have extra records in BW. Like 110 record for actual 10 records. We are unable to delete the master data as there are transaction data already present.
We have identified the root cause, why this has happened. Has anyone faced similar issue before and how is it being fixed?
Jith

Hi Jith:
Why do you think the master data is incorrect because there are 110 records for 10 master data records?
0CUST_SALES is Customer compounded to Sales Area. For each customer sales area combination there can be a record in that table.
Sales Area is Division / Dist Channel / Sales Org. The number of combinations of customer compounded to sales area can be many for a single customer as there can be many divisions many dist channels and many sales orgs.
Are you sure the master data is incorrect? I don't know of a way to delete master data without deleting transactional data that uses that master data.
Only thing you can do is to overwrite those master data records.
Hope you find a solution.
Good Luck.
MP.

0HRPOSITION master data issue when position is delimited

We are live with BW HR application and having issue with 0HRPOSITION master data. We are extracting data from SAP using 0HRPOSITION_ATTR datasource. I noticed that data is not maintained correctly in master data tables in BW and giving us incorrect results in reporting. Consider below mentioned scenario:
Position A created as vacant on 05/01/2008 with start date (BEGDA/ Valid from) as 05/01/2008 and End date (ENDDA/ Valid to) as 12/31/9999 and is vacant. Below mentioned entry is shown under maintain master data for 0HRPOSITION in BW:
Position Valid To Valid From Position Vacant
A 04/30/2008 01/01/1000
A 12/31/9999 05/01/2008 X
Position A is now delimited on 09/15/2009 as its no more required. In SAP, position has record only from 04/01/2006 till 09/20/2009 as vacant. When record is extracted in BW, it creates below mentioned entry in master data table.
Position           Valid To     Valid From     Position Vacant Indicator
    A             04/34/2008    01/01/1000
    A             09/20/2009    05/01/2008                  X
    A             12/31/9999    09/21/2009                  X
Entry 09/21/2009 - 12/31/9999 is incorrect as position does not exist for this duration and it is neither vacant nor occupied. If we report on 0HRPOSTION with key date as 09/30/2009 , it shows position A as vacant though position no longer exists.
Has anyone come across this situation. any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Prithi Iyengar
Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 3:07 PM

Hi,
We do a full update data load for 0HRPOSITION attribute as well as text on daily basis. Attribute change run are scheduled in the process chains. No issues with that..
In the report, we have the display option of 0HRPOSITION as key and text. Now what is happening is that for most of the positions the text is displayed perfectly but only for those positions which were delimited the text description is not displayed in the report. It is displayed as blank. For eg consider positions A, B, C and D. Say A, B are active positions and C & D have been delimited at a cerain period of time.
*Master data table is:*
Position -- Valid_from -- Valid_to -- Description -- Org. Unit
A         -- 01.05.2008 -- 31.12.9999-- Text1   --- A001
B         -- 01.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- Text2   --- B001
C         -- 01.06.2009 -- 01.08.2009 --- Text3 --- C001
C         -- 02.08.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- ........   --- ....
D         -- 01.07.2008 -- 15.06.2009 -- Text 4 --- D001
D         -- 16.06.2009 -- 31.12.9999 -- ........ --- ...
In report, say i run for date 01.05.2009 to 31.05.2009,
Position -
No. of positions
Key -
Text
A     | --- Text1 | 1
B     | --- Text 2 | 1
C     | --- .......... | 1
D     | --- .......... |1
If you notice, the description is maintained for positions C & D in time period 01.05 to 31.05 but the text is not displayed in the report.
Thanks,
Edited by: Prithi Iyengar on Dec 23, 2009 5:30 PM

MASTER DATA ISSUE , VENDOR MASTER

Hi,
I have a problem in vendor master. first i will explain the scenario.
we have two company codes one is in America, and the other is Europe.we have two purchase organisations called X (meant for america)& Y( meant for Europe) . X and Y has two plants called AMO1 (meant for america), US33. ( meant for Europe). purchase org X is assigned to plant america (us33),purchase org Y is assigned to Europe(am01).we are using centralized POrg. so we asshined to POrg to Plant.
Now when i am creating vendor master data. system is accepting for compay code Europe for Purchase org X( america). How it will happen?. It should propose X only.but i created vendor master record for cross combination of different assignment.Folks can you please suggest solution. SAP SHOULD THROW ERROR MESSAGE IF I CREATE THIS TYPE OF COMBINATION.But that doesn't happen.waiting for reply

Hi Vamsi,
Normarmally we can map the procurement structure by three ways.
1. Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure : where CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment dont happen i.e.
a. POrg. can procure the material for any CC.
b. Vendor master can be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), here system will not throw any warning/Error message.
and I am sure Vamsi your client is using Corporate Specific Enterprise Structure mapping.
2. Company Specific Enterprise Structure : Here CC will assigned to Plant and Plant is assigned to POrg., In this case CC & POrg. assignment does happen i.e.
a. POrg. can procure the material for only specific CC assigned with specific POrg..
b. Vendor master cannt be created with any combination like CC ( USA) & POrg. (Europe) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (USA), if you will try then system will throw any warning/Error message.
i.e. .vendor Master can be created only CC ( USA) & POrg. (USA) or CC ( Europe) & POrg. (Europe) combination.
3. Plant Specific Enterprise Structure : Here assignment will be same as Company Specific Enterprise Structure.
POrg. can procure the material for only specific plant ssigned with specific POrg..
Hope this piece of information will help you to resolve your issue.please let me know if you want any more clarification.
manoj singh

Master Data issue from external system to BW

Hi,
BW Version: BI 7.0
Source System : Oracle D/B
The Data will be processed by some external application and the processes Data will be stored in tables in Oracle D/B.I am extracting Data from Oracle Tables to BW.
The issue i had is in the external application for example if we created a new Location ID,The new location ID won't be avaliable in Oracle untill i use it (assing it to any employee)
Once i assign it to employee then the Location ID and Description will be avaliable transaction tables.
Then in this cas how can i load master data to location ID in BW.
or
Thanks

Hi,
Simply create a Location ID InfoObject that will work as Master Data. Then create a datasource for the extraction of the Location ID Master Data (at least for the attributes, and probably for the texts as well).
You can then schedule an update of this data everynight via process chains.
All this will update the desired information independently from the transaction data.
Hope it helps,

Cost Center Master Data Issue for Hierarchy

Hi,
We are building a hierarchy on Cost Center and realized that the way Master data on Cost Center is stored in SPM it's getting concatenated with Controlling Area. So CC 1234 becomes 1234_010 where 010 is a controlling area.
While we understand a need to make CC unique across several controlling area, it's impacting Hierarchy. In Hierarchy we only upload CC and not CA.
Do you recommend to do concatenation of CC & CA for Hierarchy as well so that it matches with Master? Or is there any other recommended way to go ?
Regards

Hi Rohit,
That was helpful. We will certainly take concatenation route.
However in Invoice Extract File we do get CC & CA separately in XARCOCTR & XSACOARR fields respectively.
When you say that this is concatenated even on Transaction Data are you talking about data AFTER it is loaded into SPM ? Also when data is sent out to DSE will it have CC & CA concatenated ?
Regards,

0CRM_MKTELM Master data issue

Hi Friends,
We are extracting 0CRM_MKTELM master data from CRM system to BW. After both the master data load & attribute change run activies completed through process chian, no data is available in master data in M verson. After this PC load no data updations from CRM system. But after few hours some data is getting updated in to the master with M version.
Is there any way to getting the master data updation from CRM? or any other way by which this is possible? Because users have no authrizations in BW to post the Master data directely.
Thanks in advance.
regards,
Raghu.
Edited by: TRAGHU on Feb 9, 2012 11:13 AM

required your support on this

Item Master Data issue

Hi Experts,
How to set Manager Inventory by Warehouse status on whole Item Master Data at once?
Regards,
Ravi Jha
Edited by: Ravi_Jha_SDN on Jul 22, 2010 8:52 AM

Hello Ravi...
I would strongly urge you to never update any SAP B1 table with the SQL. For several reasons:
1. SAP B1 is a strongly integrated data structure and you might think you are updating the correct field and all will be fine, but there are so many foreign keys in SAP B1 it is unbelievable (you can see this in the bolded names in the Query Generator). For folks having worked with SAP B1 for some time, they will tell you not all foreign keys are bolded and that can cause a bit of a problem. If you update a field and it is used somewhere else, the results can be total havoc.
2. It is SAP policy (due to the above) that, if an SAP B1 table is updated via SQL, it is almost certain they will not help you in case you have a problem requiring a fix through SAP. Even if you try to apply the fix yourself and it goes wrong, you will certainly be in dire straits. Your only recourse is to go back to a previous backup or to do a complete reinstall (and the effort then becomes an enormous manual or Data Transfer Workbench - DTW - effort).
3. It is not hard for SAP to determine how you have updated your tables. I once appeared in court as a forensic expert to settle a dispute between two parties on some changed information in invoicing. I received some help from some SAP folks I know. After sitting in the witness stand for 15 minutes and explaining in layman's terms what I was about to do, the defense called a recess and pleaded guilty to the charges. If I can be that efffective in determining how something was changed, guess how quickly SAP can do it!
4. You will at some time come across the need to do a DTW in the normal buisness life of your system. Learn DTW with small fixes like this "Manage Inventory by Warehouse" so you can get comfortable with it. As Manish points out, folks here will help you. I have seen folks being helped over and over again in this and other forums. I know from personal experience DTW can be a bit difficult, but I am glad I took the time to learn. Also, I have heard in Version 8.8 it is much better.
5. You might be under pressure to get that quick fix and/or update in, but in my experience, once you explain why it is taking a bit longer to the powers that be, the business folks will 99% of the time understand that the best course of action is to take some time and use the SAP DTW or Administration > Data Import/Export function to get fields updated. (NOTE: some companies advertise they have an add-on or tool that can update the fields within SAP policy, but be very careful with this and check their claim completely with partners and SAP - this claim is a lot of times not true).
I do not want to rain on anyone's parade here - it is your choice. And this is only my own personal opinion, but I just want to make sure you understand what the consequences might be pertaining to your decision. That is my intention - nothing more and nothing less...
Regards,
Zal

General Master data issue

Hello Good People!
How can I address this issue..................... The general master data of the G/L account is not maintained in the chart of accounts INT. ...... Please highlight steps to address this issue
Thanks
Note : Please post question clearly along with error message to enable quick responses,
also search forum before posting.
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Aug 19, 2011 10:04 AM

Hi,
What I understood here G/L account is not created for chart of account INT.
So create G/L account through T-code FS00 for your company code and make necessary assignment in OBYC for the G/L account.
Regards

Master data Issue --- materials have unassigned or # values ...!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for