Master data Lookup missing for sold to party

Master data Lookup missing for sold to party?
The look up flow is from E_BOM to E_BOM1
regards

Hi,
Check if SIDs are generated for the infoobject, if not try to do the change run attribute and then load the data to Cube.
Hope this helps...
Rgs,
Ravikanth.

Similar Messages

  • Master Data is missing for Specified Matierials at cube level  !!

    Hello Experts,
    Good Day..!!
    I have been facing an issue in my project,  Master Data is missing for a KF and values are not displayed  in a report for the specified matierial Nos. Where as other matierial nos KF values are displaying.
    Intially, i checked from Cube End and found the issue is in Cube level only.
    For that in the data flow, i already checked whether the data has been loaded perfectly or not.
    Tried to reran the DTP once again and checked the values for the KF in the report and unfortunately KF values are not displaying for specified matierials only.
    Kindly advice how can i move further..
    Thanks,
    SN.

    Hi,
    Check if SIDs are generated for the infoobject, if not try to do the change run attribute and then load the data to Cube.
    Hope this helps...
    Rgs,
    Ravikanth.

  • What is Attr data source name for SOLD,BILL and SHIP TO PARTY

    Hi all,
      I want master data source names for  these SOLD,BILL and SHIP TO PARTY.
       Bill to party,Ship to party and Sold to party Master data source names.
      Plz give me Some help on this.
    i want solution very urgently.
    Thanks,
    Guna.

    Dear Gunasekhar,
    There are no separate datasource for 0sold to, 0ship to and 0bill to parties.
    They are referrenced to 0CUSTOMER in BW. and the datasources for 0customer are 0CUSTOMER_ATTR and 0CUSTOMER_TEXT.
    Assign points if useful
    Regards
    Venkata Devaraj!!!

  • Sales Order Error No customer master record exists for sold-to party

    Hi,
    I am trying to create a sales order in IDES. Unfortunately it is showing me error: No Customer master exists for sold to party. Now I have already checked my assignments, combined sales area in vor1 and vor2. Checked PDP ( In PDP I have creates partner functions as z2, z5, z6, z7). I have also checked in XD02 and XD03 and in partner function tab it shows as maintained. Please help as I am still not able to create it.

    Dear Phanikumar,
    I am not sure whether we can create a customer for a future date or not.
    I might sound absurd but suggested this solution because I had faced a similar issue while I was working on a remotly supported IDES server which I was using for practice purpose.
    Now the case was that, I had created some customers few days back, lets say on 01.03.2014 and today the administrator of the server changed the date & time of the system from 11.03.2014 to 11.03.2013 bymistake.
    Hence when i was trying to create orders for a customer created on 01.03.2014 i was not able to do so as the system was throwing an error customer does not exist.
    I am sorry if I have suggested something awkward or wrong, intention was to provide a solution.
    Please correct if I have suggested someting wrong.
    Thanks,
    Kishor

  • Customer master record exists for sold to party

    i have another issue its like when am going to creat an invoice correction request i get an error it says no
    customer master record exists for sold to party the customer master is extended to the proper sales area
    can any one help me on that plz
    regards
    subhro

    Hi
    Check with the  SOLD TO PARTY PATNER FUNCTION  exist in your  customer master data or not.
    Your customer master data must have sold to party partner function.
    Thanks,
    KP

  • No Customer Master Records for sold to party 211111

    Hi SD Experts
    Ihave an issue like No Customer Master Records for sold to party 211111,
    i have done all the settings but still error is comming when i was creating sales order please help me on this .
    Regards,
    Karthik.

    Hello
    Kindly check your partner determination procedure config steps again:
    1. Define Partner Function
    2. Define Partner Determination Procedure
    3. Assign Partner Function in Partner Determination Procedure
    4. Partner Determination Procedure Assignment,  assigning Customer Account Group & Partner Function.
    5. Finally, Account Groups & Partner Function Assignment.
    Regards
    JP

  • Classification data for sold to party BP with BAPI_BUPA_CLASS_ADD

    I need to add classification data for sold to party business partner that I created.
    Business partner-->General Data->Classification-->
    Classification -
    > I need to check the check box for customer and also
    Business partner--->General Data-> Classification----->R/3 integration---->Account Group I need to put 0001.
    How should I do this? I am making use of the BAPI BAPI_BUPA_CLASS_ADD.
    Here I need to pass values to CLASSIFICATION.
    I donu2019t know what values I need to pass to this import parameter CLASSIFICATION.
    When I go and see the structure of it, I find that the following fields are there.
    CLASSCAT, CRIT1, CRIT2, CRIT3, CRIT4, CRIT5, ATTRID, VALUE.
    What values should I pass so that I can add classification data to my sold to party business partner such that the Customer check box is checked and in R/3 integration- Account Group I put 0001.
    I tried hard but unable to get information on how to put classification data in sold to party---> General Business Tab.
    If some one encountered this earlier, please help me with some info on the same.
    Regards,
    Jessica Sam
    Edited by: jessica sam on Nov 15, 2008 2:31 PM

    Jessica,
    Try looking at the following: BAPI_BUPA_FRG0040_CREATE
    Note that if you already have maintained Sales Classifications then you'll have to use the _CHANGE version.
    It has the importing structure of type BAPIBUS1006040_SALESCLASS and so you could for example populate it's fields as shown below and using the structure when calling the above BAPI:
    DATA
           IS_COMPETITOR
           IS_PROSPECT
           IS_CONSUMER
           IS_CUSTOMER                    X
           CUSTOMER_SINCE
           IS_COD_CUSTOMER
           INDUSTRY
           IS_RENTED
           ACCOUNT_GROUP                  0001
           NIELSEN_ID
           CLASSIFIC
           ATTRIBUTE
           ATTRIB_2
           ATTRIB_3
           ATTRIB_4
           ATTRIB_5
           ATTRIB_6
           ATTRIB_7
           ATTRIB_8
           ATTRIB_9
           ATTRIB_10
    Regards,
    Brad

  • ABAP for Master Data lookup

    I am trying ABAP for master data lookup in update rule.
    Here is the scenario ---
    There is a Master Data object MDABC  with attributes A1 , A2 . I need to Map IO1 to A1 and IO2 to A2.
    What should be the Start Routine and Update Routine . Please help with a working code.
    Thanks

    >
    sap_newbee wrote:
    > Thanks Aashish ,
    > Here is the code I am usind but Its not populating any result May be you could help me out in debugging
    >
    >
    > Start Routine -
    >
    > DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB_MDABC OCCURS 0,
    > MDABC LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/MDABC,
    >  A1 LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/A1,
    > A2 LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/A2,
    > END OF ITAB_NMDABC.
    >
    >  SELECT
    > /BIC/MDABC
    > /BIC/A1
    > /BIC/A2
    >  FROM /BIC/PMDABC INTO TABLE ITAB_MDABC
    >  FOR ALL ENTRIES IN DATA_PACKAGE
    > WHERE /BIC/MDABC = DATA_PACKAGE-/BIC/MDABC.
    > ENDSELECT.
    >
    >
    > In Update Routine for Infoobject IO1 The code Iam using is
    >
    >
    > READ TABLE ITAB_MDABC   WITH KEY
    >  MDABC   =  COMM_STRUCTURE-/BIC/MDABC
    >  BINARY SEARCH.
    > IF sy-subrc = 0.
    >  RESULT = ITAB_MDABC-A1.
    > ENDIF.
    >   RETURNCODE = 0.
    >
    >   ABORT = 0.
    >
    > Please help.
    > Thanks
    Please use table in the select statement. Modifications in BOLD
    Edited by: Ashish Gour on Oct 17, 2008 2:57 PM

  • 0CALDAY for time dependent master data lookup unknown when migrated to 7.0

    I am in the process of migrating a number of InfoProviders from the 3.x Business Content to the new methodology for BI 2004s.
    When I try to create a transformation from the Update Rules for 0PA_C01, all of the rules that use a master data lookup into 0EMPLOYEE give me the error such as "Rule 41 (target field: 0PERSON group: Standard Group): Time char. 0CALDAY in rule unknown". 
    How do I fix the transformation rule that is generated from the update rule for these time-dependent master data attributes?

    Hi Mark,
    look at http://www.service.sap.com/. I guess you need to implement some corrections or newer supp-packages.
    kind regards
    Siggi
    PS: take a look: https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=941525&_NLANG=EN
    Message was edited by:
            Siegfried Szameitat

  • CRM orders with error "Do not enter a business agreement for sold-to party"

    Dear SDN'ler,
    after creating orders in SAP CRM via ISA (CRM 4.0) and uploading them to R/3 all orders are created successfully in R/3 but an error message is sent back to SAP CRM in case of ALL orders.
    Error message is the following:
    "Do not enter a business agreement for sold-to party xyz"
    Message no. CRM_BILLING011
    Diagnosis
    The field "FI-CA active" is not selected for the sold-to party 6000201 in the business master record. Since the business agreement is used in the component FI-CA, excluding the control of processes, it makes sense to enter a business agreement.
    Procedure
    Delete the entered business agreement.
    ==> Could someone please give me some more information about the mentioned "business agreement"? Where do I find field "FI-CA active" (in R/3 or CRM customer master data?)?
    ==> And how can I eliminate this error message for CRM orders in SAP CRM?
    Thanks a lot.
    Best Regards,
    Rainer Gryschka

    Please check the customising setting under following path:
    SPRO --> Customer Relationship Management --> Master Data --> Business Partner -- > Business Agreement --> Define Basic Settings
    Alternatively you may also check following customisation table using SM30 --> CRMC_BUAG_ACTV

  • Poor MDX performance on F4 master data lookup

    Hi,
    <P>
    I've posted this to this forum as it didn't get much help in the BW 7.0 forum. I'm thinking it was too MDX oriented to get any help there. Hopefully someone has some ideas.
    <P>
    We have upgraded our BW system to 7.0 EHP1 SP6 from BW 3.5. There is substantial use of SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.1 (BOXI) and also significant use of navigational attibutes. Everything works fine in 3.5 and we have worked through a number of performance problems in BW 7.0. We are using BOXI 3.1 SP1 but have tested with SP2 and it generates the same MDX. We do however have all the latest MDX related notes, including the composite note 1142664.
    <P>
    We have a number of "fat" queries that act as universes for BOXI and it is when BOXI sends a MDX statement that includes certain crossjoins with navigational attributes that things fall apart. This is an example of one that runs in about a minute in 3.5:
    <P>
    SELECT { [Measures]. [494GFZKQ2EHOMQEPILFPU9QMV], [Measures].[494GFZSELD3E5CY5OFI24BPCN], [Measures].[494GG07RNAAT6M1203MQOFMS7], [Measures]. [494GG0N4P7I87V3YBRRF8JK7R] } ON COLUMNS , NON EMPTY CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( [0MAT_SALES__ZPRODCAT]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS, EXCEPT( { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M5], [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M6] } } ) ), EXCEPT( { [0SALES_OFF]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0SALES_OFF].[#] } } ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTAREA].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTREGN]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS ), [ZMFIFWEEK].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS ) DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION ON ROWS FROM [ZMSD01/ZMSD01_QBO_Q0010]
    <P>
    However in 7.0 there appear to be some master data lookups that are killing performance before we even get to the BW queries. Note that in RSRT terms this is prior to even getting the popup screen withe "display aggregate".
    <P>
    They were taking 700 seconds but now take about 150 seconds after an index was created on the ODS /BIC/AZOSDOR0300. From what I can see, the navigational attributes require BW to ask "what are the valid SIDs for SALES_OFF in this multiprovider". The odd thing is that BW 3.5 does no such query. It just hits the fact tables directly.
    <P>
    SELECT "SID" , "SALES_OFF" FROM ( SELECT "S0000"."SID","P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000"."SALES_OFF" = "S0000"."SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BI0/D0PCA_C021" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDBL018" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR028" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR038" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR058" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR081" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDPAY016" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "P0000"."SALES_OFF" IN ( SELECT "O"."SALES_OFF" AS "KEY" FROM "/BIC/AZOSDOR0300" "O" ) ) ORDER BY "SALES_OFF" ASC
    <P>
    I had assumed this had something to do with BOXI - but I don't think this is a MDX specific problem, even though it's hard to test in RSRT as it's a query navigation. Also I assumed it might be something to do with the F4 master data lookup but that's not the case, because of course this "fat" query doesn't have a selection screen, just a small initial view and a large number of free characteristics. Still I set the characteristic settings not only to do lookups on the master data values and that made no difference. Nonetheless you can see in the MDXTEST trace that event 6001: F4: Read Data. Curiously this is an extra one that sits between event 40011: MDX Initialization and event 40010: MDX Execution.
    <P>
    I've tuned this query as much as I can from the Oracle perspective and checked the indexes and statistics. Also checked Oracle is perfectly tuned and parameterized as for 10.2.0.4 with the May 2010 patchset for AIX. But this query returns an estimated 56 million rows and runs an expensive UNION join on them - so no suprise that it's slow. As a point of interest changing it from UNION to UNION ALL cuts the time to 30 seconds. Don't think that helps me though, other than confirming that it is the sort which is expensive on 56m records.
    <P>
    Thinking that the UNORDER MDX statement might make a difference, I changed the MDX to the following but that didn't make any difference either.
    <P>
    SELECT { [Measures].[494GFZKQ2EHOMQEPILFPU9QMV], [Measures].[494GFZSELD3E5CY5OFI24BPCN], [Measures].[494GG07RNAAT6M1203MQOFMS7], [Measures].[494GG0N4P7I87V3YBRRF8JK7R] } ON COLUMNS ,
    NON EMPTY UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
      UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
        UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
          UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
            UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
              [0MAT_SALES__ZPRODCAT].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS, EXCEPT(
                { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M5], [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M6] } }
            ) ), EXCEPT(
              { [0SALES_OFF].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0SALES_OFF].[#] } }
          ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTAREA].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
        ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTREGN].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
      ) ), [ZMFIFWEEK].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
    DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION ON ROWS FROM [ZMSD01/ZMSD01_QBO_Q0010]
    <P>
    Does anyone know why BW 7.0 behaves differently in this respect and what I can do to resolve the problem? It is very difficult to make any changes to the universe or BEx query because there are thousands of Webi queries written over the top and the regression test would be very expensive.
    <P>
    Regards,
    <P>
    John

    Hi John,
    couple of comments:
    - first of all you posted it in the wrong forum. This belongs into the BW forum
    - MDX enhancements in regards to BusinessObjects are part of BW 7.01 SP05 - not just BW 7.0
    would suggest you post it in the BW forum
    Ingo

  • Language issue for sold to party in sales order

    Hi,
    we have a sold to party A which is in china. the address for the same is maintained in local version and inetrnational version while creating customer master for A.
    we aslo have a sold to party B, which is in Greece. the address for the same is maintained in local version and inetrnational version while creating customer master for B.
    now we logon to sap and the language we select is Italian. we then go to t code Va01, then the first screen shows everything in Italian which is ok. we then enter order type and sales area. we then go to next screen and enter the sold to party A and we press enter. now the issue is the address against A is shown in chinese characters and not Latin ......... why so ??? we need the characters to be shown in latin and not chinese ?
    if we make a sales order for sold to party B ( logged into sap in Italian language), then the address appears in Latin and not greece ..so this is ok !
    but my question is why this is not happening for sold to party A ???  what settings i need to check in customer master and other settings. In fact how the language management works ??? and how we maintain the local and international version ? . can someone explain by taking my above example and also give possible solution to my question above for sold to party A
    regds

    Hi,
    A cutomer displaying  address in chinesse, even if you loging through Italian language,
    I think reseon for this is you had created customer master in chinesse language,
    Kapil

  • Changing Contact Person for Sold-to-party

    Hi Experts,
    i am having requirement like i have a order number and for that order number i have to add contact person for sold-to-party please can anybody help me..?

    You could do the following
    a) Extract the partner from CRM_ORDER_READ through the exporting parameter et_partner.(Check the exporting parameter)
    b) Manipulate the partner data you had extracted in step a)
    c) Pass the data to the importing parameter IT_PARTNER in the CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN.
    I think this should work.
    Regards
    Kavindra

  • Master data text missing in reports

    Dear All,
    In my report, some text for infoobject master data is missing. When I see the text table of that, entry for the interval containing 31/12/9999 is not there. I checked in R3 and there also this entry is absent. This is fine and no issues. This is in BI Quality.
    Same is not the case in Production. Here entry is there in BI for 31/12/9999 in text table but in R3 Prod, entry is not there.
    My question:
    How come the entry is there in text table in BI Prod for 31/12/9999 ? Has someone extracted it earlier when there was an entry in R3 or there could be some other reason ? If someone has extracted it earlier, and now in R3 prod, entry is not there, then this should immediately reflect in BI ?
    Please clear my confusions.
    Regards,
    Srinivas

    Fine with the answers. But how come the table in BI system is not in sync with the R3 ? Since the text is absent in R3 for the interval 31/12/9999, so it should be blank too in BI after the most recent update ? This is the property of master data.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas

  • Bank data is missing for country IN bank key SBIB0000003

    Dear Friends
    When i am start to print the cheque i am getting the error message
    "Bank data is missing for country IN bank key SBIB0000003"
    Please me suggestion
    Regards
    JK
    Moderator: Please, avoid asking basic questions

    Dear,
    Please check in T-Code FI02, that
    Bank Country = IN
    Bank Key = SBIB0000003
    Have you maintained any data there.
    Please revert.
    Br,VIvek

Maybe you are looking for

  • ICloud "Family Sharing" loses shared Notes and iDrive.  Any way to use this without losing shared features besides Apps?

    We used to share a single App Store ID so we could see all our family devices, share iDrive space for backups, share App and music purchases, and share notes and reminders.  We had separate IDs for iMessage.  Now with "Family Share" we can do some of

  • Why do i have multiple iPhoto libraries

    I am trying to migrate my iphoto library to a new location but i have 3 libraries to choose from. why were the others created? one library is 90gb, the other 2 are 22 gb Should i just delete the other 2?

  • Sg300-28 port-channel options

    i have an sg300-28 running the latest firmware, and would like some insight on port-channel options.  below are the port configs i have for a LAG to my router.  i am currently using 802.3ad with LACP.  my router is a linux machine pulling duty as a b

  • What version of iDVD is compatible with OS X 10.7.04?

    I'd like to know when iLife updates are needed. My software update prompts don't say when iDVD needs Updating.  It's confusing.  The iMovie version (9.0.4) indicates I can publish to iDVD (6.0.4).  But when I attempt to share to iDVD, a message pops

  • Clearing fields

    Hello, I have some fields set up with error messages. for example in a date field, if the user enters a date in the future and tabs out of the field, an error message appears indicating that the date cannot be in the future. The problem with this for