Material Cost Estimate - Release too early

Hi,
I ran the cost estimate for one material on 12.06.2008 and i released the cost estimate. Here it is saying 'Cost Estimate released too early'. I thought system is releasing the cost for material for the next month. but i want to update the material cost for this month only.
And how many days before you have to run the cost estimate for the new month.
sateesh

Hi Sateesh,
Please check the period which you have mentioned in CK24.
I think the period you have given is of next month. Hence system is giving that message as next month's  period may not have been opened.
System allows to release cost estimate only once in a period. Normal practice is to carry out cost run at the end of the month.
Please do let me know if your problem is solved.
regards,
makrand

Similar Messages

  • Material Cost Estimate with different lot size.

    What happens if the material cost estimate is run twice using different lot sizes each time  (all other parameters unchanged) for the same period?
    Will the cost estimate run later overwrites the results from cost estimate run earlier (though the lot size is different)? What is the role of lot size in a material cost estimate?

    The costing lot size impacts your cost estimate if you have lot size independent costs (i.e. setup cost).  Those fixed costs are spread over the costing lot sizee to give you a cost per unit..  Larger costing lot sizes can also help you minimize rounding issues.
    You can only have one marked cost estimate in a given period.  However, you can create and save a cost estimate as many times as you want as long as you have not marked it for release.  When you save the estimate it will overwrite an existing estimate.  You also have the option of creating multiple estimates under different versions or with different costing variants.

  • CK24 - "Release too early" message in log

    Hi, All:
    I am trying to perform a mark and release for period 1 in 2009 today Dec 16. The cost estimate was done without error. Marking was allowed in CK24 as well as Release. I checked the costing 2 tab and my estimate was there as the future standard cost. Everything seems OK.
    However when I check the log, it has this message:
    Message number 157 - Company code then "Release too early".
    Will this cause problem to my release on Jan 1, 2009.
    Thanks in advance for your help!
    Peter

    Thanks for your quick response, Suraj and Mangalraj!
    I am new to SAP and no one in the company knows the exact detail on how to perform the annual cost update. Hence I am asking for help here. I am doing a test on one item right now. I tried before this test to use CK40N to perform a cost run. It gave me incorrect costings. We looked into details and discovered that CK40N is for items with quantity structure. Because all our products are without quantity (purchase items), the system did the calculation incorrectly.
    I think I need to clarify a bit more about my test. We have purchase items only hence I used KKPAN - Create cost estimate without quantity structure to enter the costs in directly. There are 3 cost elements, the purchase price, the freight and inspection overhead. The cost estimate should be done by SAP right away after the data is entered. After the data entry, I perform the CK24 to mark the item. Then I use CK24 again to release. Then I checked and saw that message.
    Based on Suraju2019s comment, does that means that I have to release the costs on Jan 1, 2009 for my new standard costs to be effective? I found that to be very ineffective. Why canu2019t SAP allow me to plan ahead? I have already performed all my analysis on all the costs. I am sure they are correct. Why do I still need to perform the release on the first date of the actual period?
    With regard to Mangalraju2019s comment, I can understand that if the structure is based on some future date, the system should not allow the release because there may be errors when the actual costing run is performed. However since I am not using costing run as explained above, this is not relevant to my situation.
    One thing I want comments on is whether this message will stop my planned costs to become standard costs on Jan 1, 2009? This message is not an error, not even a warning. What will happen if I disregard this message? Will I have problem on Jan 1 with the system having outdated standard costs that I have been using for 2008? Please advise.
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Peter

  • Error reading material cost estimate for sales order (KE292)

    Dear All,
    I have an issue with billing. we are posting july month transactions, the material cost is maintained through MR21. When releasing billing document for accounting we are getting error message like"Error reading the material cost estimate for sales order "11"
    Message no. KE292
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate item 000010 of sales order 11 by reading the corresponding product cost estimate.
    However, no product cost estimate could be found for this sales order item.
    The system accessed product costing for product AMLFP011011XX00P using costing key YB3 as defined in the
    CO-PA Customizing settings.
    System Response
    The system cannot process the document any further.
    Procedure
    Check your Customizing settings."
    We cross checked with other client as a current date and we ran cost estimate through CK40N with same material. and we posted entries. Here it is working fine. but in above process it is not working. Can you pls guide me where i missed.
    Regards,
    Nagaraju,

    Hi,
    When the Costing Key is assigned to the material types in the COPA customizing, then system expects Cost estimation when billing is released to Accounts.
    If you dont run cost estimation but update the material master through MR21, system will not accept as in the Costing key configuration you must have selected the Current Standard price field for the valuation.
    Hence, try to run cost estimation and then do releasing.
    Thanks & Regards
    Ravi Kumar

  • Confuguarable Material Cost Estimate

    Hi All.,
    It is an urgent requirement.......
    My client having both configuarable & non configuarable materials.....
    with regarding to the configuarable material cost estimate i don't have good grip on this.
    Can anybody please share some guidlines for how to create the cost estimate.....
    Thanks one and all.,
    Raja

    Configurable materials can only have a cost estimate when there is a sales order bom to define the build.
    We use configurable material and the cost estimate is configured in the same manner as standard material (Costing variant,costing dates, transfer control, etc. but some of the details differ), but it is only Saved within a Sales order. You can use CU50 for a trial cost - the configuration will have to be created in CU50 before it will cost.
    When costing configurable materials in sales orders or for sales orders the valuation variant is different from standard cost variant in these points:
    1 - The costing type is different. 18 - Sales order costing vs. 01 - Standard cost est. (mat.)
    The Costing type for Sales order does not allow updating of the standard price in the Mat Mstr
    The Costing type for Sales order also controls the use of Labor overhead for the costing variant.
    2 - Valuation Variant can be different - Valuation for Prod Costing specifies the rules to build a cost estimate. For Sales order, you may want it to use ONLY the standard price for a material/component, and NOT build a cost estimate.
    3 - Date control - The default “from” date for the Config Mat in a Sales order is “Today” while for product costing it is “first of next month”
    Our Prod Cost Est. is valid until the end of the Fiscal year when a new cost estimate is released. Our Config Material on a Sales order is valid until the end of time.
    I cannot explain “why” we chose one over the other, most of the decisions were made before I arrived. But the Costing Type Difference is very important to us, because there is no chance that the cost estimate will interfere with setting of standards and it allows “searching” for a Sales Order Cost estimate.
    You have to analyze how each part of the costing variant could impact the business and decide how to set it. If circumstances change, you can review the settings later. (I fully intend to review some of ours directly after this conversation.)
    Sales Order Costing Variants are on OKY9 while product costing is at OKKN
    Sales Order Costing Variants are assigned under SD “Maintain Requirements Classes for Costing/Account Assignment (table T459K)
    Hope this helps.
    Althea

  • Material Cost estimate realted issue and question

    Hello,
        we have a multi level BOM, I have makre and released for one sub level material in the BOM, there are few other sub- materils which need to be costed, can i do the cost estimate for the highest level of BOM or do i need to do first for each sub- component in the BOM, also for the one sum- companent wchi is realesed can that be changed.
    please let me know.

    Hi
    Both are in one way the same.
    Material cost estimate can be calculated as
    1. Material with quantity structure
    2. Material without quantity structure
    You can get more insight into it at the following link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/7e/cb938143a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
    Regards,
    Suraj

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"

    Hi people,
    We have the error:
    =====================
    Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "117122"
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to valuate a line item using the current standard cost estimate.
    In order to determine the current plan period, the system needs to read the valuation segment of the material master.
    The system has found that the current plan period is not filled forproduct "117122" in plant "UBE1".
    We have the follow configuration in trans.: KE40:
    . Determine material cost estimate
       . Transf. Standard Cost Estimate
    . Costing Variant
    . Control Data for Standard Cost Estimate
       . Period Indicator = "Current Standard Cost Estimate acc. to entry in mat master
    . Addiitonal data CO-PC
        . Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency  "activated"
    We think the reason about our error is because the field above is activated and some configuration more is necessary for this case. For examplo: Trans.: OKYW and this one was not configurated yet.
    Do you know what happend?
    If we need to configure some transation, or sonly process the cost estimate?
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

    Hello Guido
    Thank you very much for your return.
    It is happenning in a Client that some people are doing the configuration.
    Before we didin't have in KE40, the fiel "Transfer cost estimate in controlling area currency" activated.
    And now, the people activate that in this new Client and I don't know the impact about that.
    I think we have to make the configuration in OKYW.
    The other transation you told me, we don't have any information.
    Could you tell me some other idea what happend?
    Message error is just "Message no. KE350"
    Abou claculate the cost:
    It was calculated by trans.: CK11N for future planning and the real wasn't not possible to release because this material already have moviments.
    Could you tell us is there is some thing more to do?
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "

    Hi,
    I am getting an error:
    Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product " 200038 "  (Message KE350).
    Kindly assist on the same?

    If this material is mto material go to t.code KE40 and maintain define access to standard cost estimate define cost key with
    "Transfer sales orde cost estimatex".
    If it is mts material define costing key with Transfer std cost estimate  and in costing data
    costing variant : ppc1
    costing verstion: 1
    period  indicator:  Release std cost estimate matching with goods issue or material costing matching posting date.
    This will resolve ur problem.

  • Raw material cost estimates

    HI experts,
    Currently we have the following scenario:
    There are some raw materials which are procured externally, and these materials are maintained with price control S
    Well, the problem is that the standard cost for the material consists of a few more components, for example:
    The standard price for the material X is 20 USD which consists of:
    - the price of the material itself : 15 USD
    - the import duty : 5 USD
    let's say if the actual import duty happened during IR is 6 USD, how can we get the variance from the difference between the import duty? I am unfamiliar with raw material cost estimate, but seeing that the import duty will be captured using condition type in PO, i assumed that we can use raw material cost estimates with this, and use the COPA report with record type B for this case.
    Could anyone give any suggestions regarding this case? It is better if it comes with step to step guide.
    Thank you very much in advance
    Regards,
    Erwin

    Hi Erwin
    1. The ideal design would have been Price Control V if the material is outright purchased... There by not leaving any scope for variances... You would agree that it is best to valuate inventory @ actuals as far as possible
    2. If you want to retain S, then release your Std cost as many times as the Base Price of 15 or Import duty of 5 usd changes... This will also avoid variances during MIGO.. However, it will throw up inventory revaluation figure each time u release new cost estimate
    Else, the variances will be updated to CO or COPA as per your choice in OKB9.... The record type will be B
    Are you not able to update variance to COPA?
    br, Ajay M

  • Transferring results of material cost estimates to COPA

    Hi,
    I heard that it is possible to transfer the standard prices of materials estimated in material cost estimate to COPA.
    Which transation is used for this purpose?
    Regards,
    Karol

    Karol,
    Incase of made to stock scenario, there is no specific transcation code to transfer the stanadrad price of a material to COPA it gets automatically transferred to COPA when the billing document are released to accounts.
    The variance in the production order if any will be transferred to COPA when theproducion order is finally settled.

  • Report for Material Cost Estimate

    Hi Everyone,
    Is there any way that I could download a report from the SAP showing all the material cost estimates? Hope someone could help me. When I try using CK11n, there is no tab there for report downloads and it only shows one material.
    Thank you in advance
    Jahziel

    Dear Jahziel,
    In standard SAP the following reports are available:
    T Code : CK84_99 : COST_ELEMENT - Cost Elements
                 CK80_99 - Cost Components
                 CK84_99 - Itemization
    These reports will provide you the information at individual material level.
    Regards,
    Pavan Kumar Arvapally

  • Error while creating material cost estimate

    Hello All
    I am creating material cost estimate of FG whose components are SF & ROH-2. While creating cost estimate system gives an error message which states: :
    *No cost element segment exists for 40103110 on 01.09.2009
    Message no. CK048
    Diagnosis
    The consumption account found by automatic account determination for material STD-PRICE-SF does not exist for the date 01.09.2009 specified.
    Procedure
    Check the cost element segment's validity period
    Check cost element
    Or, if you have authorization, create a cost element which did not exist previously.
    Create primary cost element*
    Please provide your valuable inputs regarding this error message. Looking forward to your inputs & feedback.
    Regards,
    J K Tharwani

    Dear Jitendra,
    Its Seem primary cost element you mentioned is not defined for 09 period.For this go to KA06,gIve that cost element number and the Valid from  date as 01.09.2009 and valid to date as 30.09.2009, press enter it will take u inside the T.C,feed the relevant data and save.
    Now again take the costing run.This time system should not throw the error.
    Check and Revert back.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Jitendra DIlip Chauhan.

  • Re: create material cost estimate with ck11n without

    hi gurus,
    i need to do create material cost estimate with ck11n without cost result but before i need to check the BOM with material component 11111, and also instruct me how to correct maintain BOM list to get the standard cost
    if anybody do the same scenoria giveme your golden inputs
    thanks in advance,
    kumar.b

    Hi,
    As note 351835 explains, calculation needs an inforecord to calculate prices from purchasing. Prices from outline agreements are generally not taken into account. According to note 499699, the system may consider entries in the source but it will ignore entered agreements (before this correction, any source list entries with agreement were ignored).
    Prices from agreements could only be considered either via a modification or by using the user exit for material valuation (COPCP005).
    This unfortuntely is a restriction resulting as a side-effect from note 499699. As soon as an agreement is entered in the source list, the fixed indicator will not be considered anymore.
    You therefore have two options to overcome this.
    1) You create a second source list entry without an agreement; then the fix indicator will be reflected; report Z_CREATE_EORD from note  409960 could be used to do this automatically
    2) You are using user-exit EXIT_SAPLMEQR_001 in order to 'overrule'   the standard search for source of supply (enhancement LMEQR001)
    regards
    Waman

  • Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product

    Hi Experts,
    Message no. KE350, Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "2286940000". Please suggest me to resolve this issue.
    Points will be provided for good solution.
    Regards,
    Jay

    Hi Jaya
    This means that your customization is wrong then...
    In KE4J or KEPC you have assigned costing keys to your material types or some other combination... You should have done this config in a way that costing key is not called  for in the case of non valuated materials...
    In Ke40 you have defined costing key where in you have specified "Issue error msg if no cost estimate found".. This costing key is assigned in KE4J or KEPC in a way that it is getting called even in case of non valuated materials...
    Do you have a separate mat type for non valuated material? If yes, remove this mat type from KE4J/KEPC..
    If you dont have separate mat type i.e. in the same mat type if you have both valuated and non valuated, then you have a problem.. You would get stuck in that case
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Valuation using material cost estimate

    Ciao a tutti,
    We have create a material cost
    estimate without standard structure(unit costing) not FOR ALL MATERIALS, but only for ONE
    VARIANT of generic material (retail solution) (because the other variant have the same price, and because we have to reproduced 5000 BOM in unit cost for just
    one variant with transaction KKPA LSMW)
    So, now we have to valuated the material cost estimate when the customer create the billing document and put the split of the cost estimate in co-pa
    Our prolem is : we have calculate standard cost estimate for 5000
    variant not for all variant (because our customer crete the BOM in unit
    costing with transaction KKPA and LSMW, and they refuced the idea to
    calculate 30000 cost estimate with lsmw) so when we crete a billing
    document with a variant that haven't cost estimate created the system doesn't
    valuated the cost estimate (the system works well), but how I can change the variant in the valuation and put the variant that have the cost
    estimate calculate?
    Wiht the transaction "Assign Costing Keys to Any Characteristics" I think
    is not possible.
    I must to use enhance COPA0002?
    Thank you very much
    Paolo Artini
    tel: +393299223804

    Hi All,
    I am also facing the problem for Sales Order Cost Estimate. and the Costing Status is VO(Marked without errors).
    I have done the following
    created the Costing Key (sales order cost estimate)
    assigned costing key to the material type.
    assigned to the respective value fields
    sales order cost estimate,
    Run the RA
    Settlement done.
    But in COPA, cost estimates are not being split up based on the cost component (like Material, Labour and Over head) and it is getting posted to COGS only.
    Do we need to change the costing status to FR, if yes, but how to do ?
    Regards
    Ramesh KR
    +91 9884020411

Maybe you are looking for

  • Updated itunes wont download. error message

    digiatl signature? trying to download latest version of itunes but wont finish. Get error message about digital signature. huh?

  • Backing up a share point (external hard drive connected to Time Capsule) using time machine.

    I am currently using Mac OS X Lion, and just set up my time capsule with an external hard drive to store itunes, iPhoto libraries, etc.  Is it possible to use time machine to backup the external hard drive to the 2 TB internal hard drive in the time

  • How to use custom PAM module to unlock screen ?

    Hi, I actually use a custom PAM module for authentificate my users. This is working like a charm with sudo. I wanted to add it with the login screen, the one that everyone use. I added my config in /etc/pam.d/authorization and everything is working.

  • Substituion: Funtional Area as Blank

    the system is Ecc 6.0 I have created a substituion rule in OBBH at line item (call point =2) as: pre-requiaite: if G/L = 0000000001 - 0049999999 then FKBER FKBER_LONG When I use one FKBER, the functional area still get populated on the balancesheet a

  • ECC No of the supplier in RG23A2

    Dear Experts Excise Control Code , Range & Division  of the supplieris are  not appearing in the RG23A2 report .WE have defined the ECC No and all the details in BP Masters.Can anybody please tell me the how to show them in the RG23A2 report. warm re