Materialize a Subquery without using "with" clause
Hi experts,
We know that we can materialize a subquery as below :
with sub_q as
( select /*+ materialize */ a,b,c from table_name )
select * from sub_q;
My question is, is there any other way to force a subquery be materialized by writing straight as below ?:
select * from
( select a,b,c from table_name );
Thanks in advance.
user503699 wrote:
You sure about that? I don't think so. ;)??? Do you understand what materialize is? I don't think so. Feel the difference:
SQL> create table emp1 as select * from emp
2 /
Table created.
SQL> explain plan for
2 with t as (
3 select /*+ materialize */ * from emp1 where deptno = 10
4 )
5 select * from t where job = 'CLERK'
6 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 481100556
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 261 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION | | | | | |
| 2 | LOAD AS SELECT | | | | | |
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | EMP1 | 3 | 261 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4 | VIEW | | 3 | 261 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6608_11C6B35 | 3 | 261 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | <== SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6608_11C6B35 is a metrialized table t
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - filter("DEPTNO"=10)
4 - filter("JOB"='CLERK')
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
22 rows selected.
SQL> explain plan for
2 select * from (select /*+ materialize */ * from emp1 where deptno = 10) t where job = 'CLERK'
3 /
Explained.
SQL> @?\rdbms\admin\utlxpls
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2226897347
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 87 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP1 | 1 | 87 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 - filter("EMP1"."JOB"='CLERK' AND "DEPTNO"=10)
Note
- dynamic sampling used for this statement
17 rows selected.
SQL> SY
Similar Messages
-
Unable to display data no entry in the table without using Model clause
Hi,
I've an urgent requirement described below :
The previously posted Question has been answerted using Model Clause:
Is there any way out to solve it without using Model clause:
I've a table named as "sale" consisting of three columns : empno, sale_amt and sale_date.
(Please ref. The table script with data as given below)
Now if I execute the query :
"select trunc(sale_date) sale_date, sum(sale_amt) total_sale from sale group by trunc(sale_date) order by 1"
then it displays the data for the dates of which there is an entry in that table. But it does not display data for the
date of which there is no entry in that table.
If you run the Table script with data in your schema, then u'll see that there is no entry for 28th. Nov. 2009 in
sale table. Now the above query displays data for rest of the dates as its are in sale table except for 28th. Nov. 2009.
But I need its presence in the query output with a value of "sale_date" as "28th. Nov. 2009" and that of "total_sale" as
"0".
Is there any means to get the result as I require?
Please help ASAP.
Thanks in advance.
Create table script with data:
CREATE TABLE SALE
EMPNO NUMBER,
SALE_AMT NUMBER,
SALE_DATE DATE
SET DEFINE OFF;
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(100, 1000, TO_DATE('12/01/2009 10:20:10', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(100, 1000, TO_DATE('11/30/2009 10:21:04', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(100, 1000, TO_DATE('11/29/2009 10:21:05', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(100, 1000, TO_DATE('11/26/2009 10:21:06', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(100, 1000, TO_DATE('11/25/2009 10:21:07', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(200, 5000, TO_DATE('11/27/2009 10:23:06', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(200, 4000, TO_DATE('11/29/2009 10:23:08', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(200, 3000, TO_DATE('11/24/2009 10:23:09', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(200, 2000, TO_DATE('11/30/2009 10:23:10', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(300, 7000, TO_DATE('11/24/2009 10:24:19', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(300, 5000, TO_DATE('11/25/2009 10:24:20', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(300, 3000, TO_DATE('11/27/2009 10:24:21', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(300, 2000, TO_DATE('11/29/2009 10:24:22', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
Insert into SALE
(EMPNO, SALE_AMT, SALE_DATE)
Values
(300, 1000, TO_DATE('11/30/2009 10:24:22', 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'));
COMMIT;
Any help will be needful for me
Regards,select sale_date,sum(sale_amt) total_sale
from
select empno,0 sale_amt,(sale_date + ao.rn) sale_date
from
select empno,sale_amt,sale_date ,(t.nxt_dt - t.sale_date) diff
from
select empno
,sale_amt,trunc(sale_date) sale_date
,trunc(nvl(lead(sale_date) over (partition by 1 order by sale_date),sale_date)) nxt_dt
from sale
) t
where (t.nxt_dt - t.sale_date) >1
) rec,(select rownum rn from user_objects where rownum<=200) ao
where ao.rn <=(rec.diff-1)
union all
select empno,sale_amt,trunc(sale_date) sale_date
from sale
group by sale_date
order by 1;
~~~~Guess this will serve the purpose...
Cheers Arpan -
Using full outer join of subqueries named using with clause
Hi,
I am trying to create a view which is having 2 subqueries vol1 & vol2 with WITH clause. I am joining those 2 subqueries in the main query with FULL OUTER JOIN.
When i compile that view in a tool like pl/sql developer, It has been compiled successfully.
But when i call the view creation script from SQL command prompt, It is throwing error as
from vol1 FULL JOIN vol2 o ON (vol1.ct_reference = vol2.ct_reference and vol1.table_name = vol2.table_name
ERROR at line 29:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
Kindly advise whats going wrong.that's line 29. Maybe you get a better idea if you strip your operation of all the unneccessary elements until it works.
There are some known bugs with subquery factoring (aka with clause) and also with ANSI join syntax, but it is hard to tell what happens here based on your description. But one thing is strange - if it is not a result of formatting (not formatting): I would expect the asterisk beneath the unknown table and not beneath the key word FULL.
P.S.: my editor makes me think it's rather a proportional font thing. Have I already said that I don't like proportional font for SQL code examples? -
'Missing select' error for update statement using WITH clause
Hi,
I am getting the below error for update statement using WITH clause
SQL Error: ORA-00928: missing SELECT keyword
UPDATE A
set A.col1 = 'val1'
where
A.col2 IN (
WITH D AS
SELECT col2 FROM
(SELECT col2, MIN(datecol) col3 FROM DS
WHERE <conditions>
GROUP BY PATIENT) D2
WHERE
<conditions on A.col4 and D2.col3>Hi,
The format of a query using WITH is:
WITH d AS
SELECT ... -- sub_query
SELECT ... -- main query
You don't have a main query. The keyword FROM has to come immediately after the right ')' that ends the last WITH clause sub-query.
That explains the problem based on what you posted. I can't tell if the real problem is in the conditions that you didn't post.
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a complete test script that people can run to re-create the problem and test their ideas. Include a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all the tables involved, and the results you want from that data.
In the case of a DML operation (such as UPDATE) the sample data should show what the tables are like before the DML, and the results will be the contents of the changed table(s) after the DML.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say what version of Oracle you're using (e.g. 11.2.0.2.0).
See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002 -
Construct a Sql block using With Clause to improve the performance
I have got four diff parametrized cursor in my Pl/Sql Procedure. As the performance of the Procedure is very pathetic,so i have been asked to tune the Select statements used in those cursors.
So I am trying to use the With Clause in order to club all those four Select Statements.
I would appreciate if anybody can help me to construct the Sql Block using With Clause.
My DB version is..
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
Four Diff cursors are defined below.
CURSOR all_iss (
b_batch_end_date IN TIMESTAMP,
IS
SELECT isb.*
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN isb
, ISSUE iss
WHERE isb.issue_id = iss.issue_id
AND iss.issue_status_id = 50738
AND ewo_no IN
(SELECT TO_CHAR(wo_no)
FROM MGO_PLANT_AUDIT
WHERE dml_status = 'U' OR dml_status = 'I')
UNION ALL
SELECT isb.*
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN isb
, ISSUE iss
WHERE isb.issue_id = iss.issue_id
AND iss.issue_status_id = 50738
AND CAST (isb.last_updt_timstm AS TIMESTAMP) >=
b_batch_end_date;
CURSOR ewo_plant ( p_ewo_no IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.ewo_no%TYPE)
IS
SELECT DISTINCT wo_no ,
plant_code
FROM MGO_PLANT
WHERE TO_CHAR(wo_no) = p_ewo_no;
CURSOR iss_ewo_plnt (
p_issue_id IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.issue_id%TYPE ,
p_ewo_no IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.EWO_NO%TYPE,
p_plnt_code IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.PLT_FACLTY_ID%TYPE)
IS
SELECT *
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN
WHERE issue_id = p_issue_id
AND ewo_no = p_ewo_no
AND
(plt_faclty_id = p_plnt_code
OR
plt_faclty_id IS NULL);
CURSOR iss_ewo_plnt_count (
p_issue_id IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.issue_id%TYPE ,
p_ewo_no IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.EWO_NO%TYPE,
p_plnt_code IN IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN.PLT_FACLTY_ID%TYPE)
IS
SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN
WHERE issue_id = p_issue_id
AND ewo_no = p_ewo_no
AND
(plt_faclty_id = p_plnt_code
OR
plt_faclty_id IS NULL);Not tested. Some thing like below. i just made the queries as tables and given name as a,b,c and substituted columns for the parameters used in the 2nd cursor and third cursor. Try like this.
CURSOR all_iss (
b_batch_end_date IN TIMESTAMP,
IS
select a.*,b.*,c.* from
( SELECT isb.*
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN isb
, ISSUE iss
WHERE isb.issue_id = iss.issue_id
AND iss.issue_status_id = 50738
AND ewo_no IN
(SELECT TO_CHAR(wo_no)
FROM MGO_PLANT_AUDIT
WHERE dml_status = 'U' OR dml_status = 'I')
UNION ALL
SELECT isb.*
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN isb
, ISSUE iss
WHERE isb.issue_id = iss.issue_id
AND iss.issue_status_id = 50738
AND CAST (isb.last_updt_timstm AS TIMESTAMP) >=
b_batch_end_date) a,
( SELECT DISTINCT wo_no ,
plant_code
FROM MGO_PLANT
WHERE TO_CHAR(wo_no) = p_ewo_no) b,
( SELECT *
FROM IMPLMN_STEP_BREKPN
WHERE issue_id = p_issue_id
AND ewo_no = p_ewo_no
plt_faclty_id IS NULL) c
where b.wo_no = c.ewo_no and
c.issue_id = a.issue_id ;
vinodh
Edited by: Vinodh2 on Jul 11, 2010 12:03 PM -
I have an update statement that is using the same suquery twice.
I am not usre if WITh clause be used in update statements?
Is there a way the below statement can be modified to use WITH clause?
UPDATE EMP_TRACKING_LIST L
SET ACTIVE_FLAG = DECODE((SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM EMP_TRACKING_LIST L2
WHERE L.NAME = L2.NAME AND
L.EMP_CODE = L2.EMP_CODE AND
L2.EMP_FLAG = 'Y'), 0, 'N', 'Y')
WHERE ACTIVE_FLAG != DECODE((SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM EMP_TRACKING_LIST L2
WHERE L.NAME = L2.NAME AND
L.EMP_CODE = L2.EMP_CODE AND
L2.EMP_ACTIVE_FLAG = 'Y'), 0, 'N', 'Y')
OR EMP_ACTIVE_FLAG IS NULL;
I would really appreciate your input
Edited by: user10937534 on Sep 2, 2009 4:47 PMHi,
WITH comes immediately before SELECT, not before UPDATE.
To use WITH in an UPDATE statement, you would say something like:
UPDATE EMP_TRACKING_LIST L
SET ACTIVE_FLAG =
WITH sub_q AS
SELECT ...
SELECT ...
FROM sub_q ...
;I don't think there's any way to use values from the sub-query in the WHERE clause of the UPDATE statement itself; MERGE is a much better bet for eliminating redundancy there.
Sorry, I'm not at a database now, so I can test anything. -
Using WITH clause in Pro*Cobol
Hi!
I am trying to improve the performance of a query by introducing WITH clause.
The query is in Pro*Cobol Release 9.2.0.6.0 - Production.
I got compilation error
WITH DPTCOST AS (
...............1
PCB-S-00400, Encountered the symbol "DPTCOST" when expecting one of the following:
END-EXEC
....continued
So I wonder if we could use that clause at all with Pro*Cobol
Here is the excerp of the code
EXEC SQL
DECLARE INPUT_ACTUAL CURSOR FOR
WITH DPTCOST AS (
SELECT /*+ rule */
A.CODE_COMBINATION_ID,
A.SEGMENT1, A.SEGMENT2, A.SEGMENT3,
A.SEGMENT6,
D.COSTING, D.PROCESS,
D.MTL_CODE, D.FACTOR
FROM
GL_CODE_COMBINATION A,
ALCGL_DEPARTMENT_COSTINGS D
WHERE
A.TEMPLATE_ID IS NULL
AND A.SUMMARY_FLAG <> 'Y'
AND A.SEGMENT1 = D.PLANT_NUMBER
AND A.SEGMENT3 <> '6999001'
AND A.SEGMENT3 <> '6999002'
AND SUBSTR(A.SEGMENT2,4,3) = D.DEPARTMENT
AND D.ACTUAL_FLAG = 'A'
) ... continuedMaterialized views are basically stored query results. They offer advanced functionality like query rewrite, refresh on commit, and more;
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_6002.htm
Unlike a view, they actually store the results of the query - not just the query;
SQL> create table t (cid number primary key)
Table created.
SQL> insert into t select object_id from dba_objects where object_id is not null
12791 rows created.
SQL> create materialized view mv
as select * from t
Snapshot created.
SQL> select object_name, object_type from user_objects where object_name ='MV'
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE
MV TABLE
MV MATERIALIZED VIEW
2 rows selected.
SQL> select segment_name, bytes from user_segments where segment_name in ('T', 'MV')
SEGMENT_NAME BYTES
T 196608
MV 196608
2 rows selected.Temporary tables are simply tables that are created then dropped. GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLES have the advantage (or disadvantage) of only existing until commit or the end of the session. They results are visible to the user that inserted the data - but only temporarily;
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_7002.htm#sthref7483 -
I am using the sql with following construct , the explain plan doesn't show that index on col1 of tab1 (used in with clause) as used- it just shows a full table access of a view (system) - result set of query in with clause.
1. Is it that oracle will not use that index or it doesn't show up
2. If so then is it good to have that table in join of all the three sqls that i am doing union - atleast in that case the index on col1 gets used (per explain plan).
with sql1 ( select * from tab1 where col1 = 'y')
select col_gen
from tab2 a, sql1 b
where a.col3 = b.col3
union
select col_gen
from tab3 a, sql1 b
where a.col3 = b.col4
Union
select col_gen
from tab4 a, sql1 b
where a.col3 = b.col4WITH tab1 AS ( SELECT * FROM tab12 WHERE SESSION_ID = '12')
SELECT DISTINCT b.unit_key unit_key ,NULL colabc1_KEY ,NULL colabc3_KEY,a.col3_ID
FROM tab1_col31_MAP a, tab1 b
WHERE a.unit_id = b.unit_id
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT NULL unit_key ,b.colabc1_KEY colabc1_KEY,NULL colabc3_KEY,a.col3_ID
FROM tab2_col32_MAP a,tab1 b
WHERE a.colabc1_id = b.colabc1_id
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT NULL unit_key,NULL colabc2_KEY,b.colabc3_KEY colabc3_KEY,a.col3_ID
FROM tab1_col33 a, tab1 b
WHERE a.colabc3_id = b.colabc3_id
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop
SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE
RECURSIVE EXECUTION SYS_LE_2_0
TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
SORT UNIQUE
UNION-ALL
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_53EE226
INDEX RANGE SCAN SYS_C00133240
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_53EE226
INDEX RANGE SCAN SYS_C00133205
NESTED LOOPS
VIEW
TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS_TEMP_0FD9D6603_53EE226
INDEX RANGE SCAN SYS_C00133202
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
SELECT * FROM tab12 WHERE SESSION_ID = '12'
Operation Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop
SELECT STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID tab12
INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX
Will the temp table transformation use the index used in the query above (ie. IDX) -
Hi all,
I am getting ORA-00928 error [missing SELECT statement] when running below statement.
Is 'WITH' clause allow in PLSQL?
-- Created on 26/12/2007
declare
-- Local variables here
i integer;
begin
-- Test statements here
WITH x AS (
SELECT /*+materialize*/ *
FROM ALL_OBJECTS
WHERE LAST_DDL_TIME > SYSDATE-1
INSERT INTO tmp1
SELECT *
FROM x;
end;wrong syntax, you need this....
ME_XE?create table tmp1 as select * from all_objects where 1=0;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.21
ME_XE?create table x as select * from all_objects where rownum < 10;
Table created.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.51
ME_XE?declare
2 -- Local variables here
3 i integer;
4 begin
5 INSERT INTO tmp1
6 WITH x AS (
7 SELECT /*+materialize*/ *
8 FROM ALL_OBJECTS
9 WHERE LAST_DDL_TIME > SYSDATE-1
10 )
11 SELECT *
12 FROM x;
13 end;
14 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
Elapsed: 00:00:00.15
ME_XE? -
Syntax help needed in update using 'WITH' Clause
Update CP_JP_CORP_FSASA_FEEDUPLOAD_r r
set (
gfrn,
tenor_code,
tenor_description,
exposure_category,
frr,
facility_classification,
limit_amount,
limit_usd,
approval_ccy,
approval_date,
expiry_date,
avail_status_code,
avail_status_desc,
revolving_indicator,
committed_flag,
committed_until_date,
committed_amount,
advised_flag,
advised_amount,
facility_long_description,
booking_unit_code,
extending_unit_code,
extending_unit_short_desc,
approving_unit_code,
approving_unit_short_des,
transaction_type,
branch_no
=
With t as
Select fac.gfrn,fac.tenor_code,fac.tenor_description,fac.exposure_category,fac.frr,
fac.facility_classification,fac.limit_amount,fac.limit_usd,fac.approval_ccy,
fac.approval_date,fac.expiry_date,fac.avail_status_code,fac.avail_status_desc,
fac.revolving_indicator,fac.committed_flag,fac.committed_until_date,fac.committed_amount,
fac.advised_flag,fac.advised_amount,fac.facility_long_description,fac.booking_unit_code,
fac.extending_unit_code,fac.extending_unit_short_desc,fac.approving_unit_code,fac.approving_unit_short_des,
/*'Check' normalflag,
cust.adjusted_orr fsasaorr1stborrower,
'Normal' category1stborrower,
cust.adjusted_orr fsasaorr2ndborrower,
'Normal' category2ndborrower,
cust.adjusted_orr fsasaorrfinal,
'Normal' categoryfinal */
txn.transaction_type,txn.branch_no,txn.gfcid,txn.transaction_id
from cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_fac_hist fac,
--cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_cust_hist cust,
cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_txn_hist txn
where fac.gfcid = txn.gfcid
and fac.facility_id = txn.facility_id
and fac.as_of_date = txn.as_of_date
and to_char(fac.as_of_date,'yyyymm') = p_financial_period
and fac.as_of_date = last_day(fac.as_of_date)
select t.gfrn,
t.tenor_code,
t.tenor_description,
t.exposure_category,
t.frr,
t.facility_classification,
t.limit_amount,
t.limit_usd,
t.approval_ccy,
t.approval_date,
t.expiry_date,
t.avail_status_code,
t.avail_status_desc,
t.revolving_indicator,
t.committed_flag,
t.committed_until_date,
t.committed_amount,
t.advised_flag,
t.advised_amount,
t.facility_long_description
t.booking_unit_code,
t.extending_unit_code,
t.extending_unit_short_desc,
t.approving_unit_code,
t.approving_unit_short_des,
t.transaction_type,
t.branch_no
from t
where r.financialperiod = p_financial_period
and exists
Select 1
from t
where t.transaction_id = r.ce_trans_id
)I'm facing syntax problemHii All,
This is my actual update.(I stopped performing dml operations in cursors following Karthick Arp) :-)
Update CP_JP_CORP_FSASA_FEEDUPLOAD_r r
set (
gfrn,
tenor_code,
tenor_description,
exposure_category,
frr,
facility_classification,
limit_amount,
limit_usd,
approval_ccy,
approval_date,
expiry_date,
avail_status_code,
avail_status_desc,
revolving_indicator,
committed_flag,
committed_until_date,
committed_amount,
advised_flag,
advised_amount,
facility_long_description,
booking_unit_code,
extending_unit_code,
extending_unit_short_desc,
approving_unit_code,
approving_unit_short_des,
transaction_type,
branch_no
= (
Select fac.gfrn,fac.tenor_code,fac.tenor_description,fac.exposure_category,fac.frr,
fac.facility_classification,fac.limit_amount,fac.limit_usd,fac.approval_ccy,
fac.approval_date,fac.expiry_date,fac.avail_status_code,fac.avail_status_desc,
fac.revolving_indicator,fac.committed_flag,fac.committed_until_date,fac.committed_amount,
fac.advised_flag,fac.advised_amount,fac.facility_long_description,fac.booking_unit_code,
fac.extending_unit_code,fac.extending_unit_short_desc,fac.approving_unit_code,fac.approving_unit_short_des,
txn.transaction_type,txn.branch_no
from cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_fac_hist fac,
--cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_cust_hist cust,
cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_txn_hist txn
where fac.gfcid = txn.gfcid
and fac.facility_id = txn.facility_id
and fac.as_of_date = txn.as_of_date
and to_char(fac.as_of_date,'yyyymm') = p_financial_period
and fac.as_of_date = last_day(fac.as_of_date)
where Exists
Select 1
from cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_fac_hist fac,
cp_fsa_boj_corp_cr_txn_hist txn
where fac.gfcid = txn.gfcid
and fac.facility_id = txn.facility_id
and fac.as_of_date = txn.as_of_date
and to_char(fac.as_of_date,'yyyymm') = p_financial_period
and fac.as_of_date = last_day(fac.as_of_date)
and txn.transaction_id = r.ce_trans_id
)Now in my update I'm using same 'SELECT' twice once in 'SET' and again in 'EXISTS' clause. I'd like to make use of 'WITH' Clause and avoid unnecessary 'SELECT' . Please help me. -
Parallel Execution of Sub Queries using WITH clause ?
Hi ,
For the below query is it that Oracle Optimizer executes "sum_data" and "avg_data" queries parallely ?
WITH sum_data AS
SELECT deptno, sum(sal) AS S FROM emp GROUP BY deptno ),
avg_data AS
SELECT deptno, avg(sal) AS A FROM emp GROUP BY deptno )
SELECT sum_data.deptno, s, a, s / a FROM sum_data , avg_data
WHERE sum_data.deptno = avg_data.deptno
ORDER BY sum_data.deptno
THANKSNo, it doesn't.
You can add the parallel hint to each query itsel to speed up the exuction of a given query. But the WITH clause has nothing to do with parallel, it only uses temp or memory to keep the data being processed and thus speeds up the performance.
Edited by: DimaK on Feb 25, 2011 10:42 AM -
How to use "with clause query" in DBadapter
Hi all,
I need to implement a "with clause" query in oracle soa 11g bpel. When i put the query in db adapter in pure sql, the schema is not getting generated properly. Can any one suggest a solution to my problem.
Regards,
KaushikPure SQL won't work because it is expecting the first word in the SQL to be SELECT (or INSERT,UPDATE,DELETE).
If your query is WITH ... SELECT ...
try this:
delete everything before SELECT. Copy and paste the generated XSD to another window. The SQL test may fail, but that will just mean that it couldn't fill in the types of the columns in the SELECT ... FROM list. You can always do that yourself by hand editing the XSD (including in the wizard before you hit next). Then put back the WITH ... clause before the remaining SELECT .... If the XSD gets overwritten, copy the version you saved in the other window and paste it over top. Then hit next and the runtime should still work.
Keep in mind that SQL is very complex and hard to fully parse in the UI. However the minimum information the DbAdapter needs is quite limited; basically just the name and number of columns that are coming back. The XSD is meant to be editable in the wizard if the SQL is too complex.
Thanks
Steve -
Temp start transformation using "with"clause
I'm experiencing a very strange problem. I wrote the SQL below and when I execute through toad and sqlplus, oracle makes the star transformation, but when I execute it through C, it doens't makes the transformation. Any help are welcome.
WITH a AS
(SELECT /*+ materialize use_hash(c,p,c3) */
c.parent_account_no, c.package_id, c3.siebel_instance_id
FROM cmf_package c, package_definition_values p,
cmf_packages_fat3c c3
WHERE c.inactive_dt IS NULL
AND c.package_inst_id = c3.package_instance_id
AND c.package_inst_id_serv = c3.package_instance_id_serv
AND c.package_id = p.package_id
AND p.short_display IS NULL)
SELECT /*+ leading(c ) push_subq use_hash(acr,pdv,cpcp3,ciam,c) */
'PACK_VOZ_DUP', cp.parent_account_no, ciam.external_id, c.bill_period,
cp3.siebel_instance_id, cp.package_id, acr.is_business,
TO_NUMBER (NULL), 1, c.bill_state, 'SI', acr.ROWID, pdv.ROWID,
cp.ROWID, cp3.ROWID, ciam.ROWID, c.ROWID
FROM account_category_ref acr,
package_definition_values pdv,
cmf_package cp,
cmf_packages_fat3c cp3,
customer_id_acct_map ciam,
cmf c
WHERE pdv.short_display IS NULL
AND pdv.package_id = cp.package_id
AND cp.inactive_dt IS NULL
AND cp.parent_account_no = c.account_no
AND c.account_category = acr.account_category
AND c.account_no = ciam.account_no
AND ciam.external_id_type = 14
AND ciam.is_current = 1
AND cp.package_inst_id = cp3.package_instance_id
AND cp.package_inst_id_serv = cp3.package_instance_id_serv
AND cp3.siebel_instance_id IS NOT NULL
AND EXISTS (
SELECT /*+ hash_sj */
1
FROM a c3
WHERE c3.parent_account_no = cp.parent_account_no
AND c3.package_id <> cp.package_id
AND c3.siebel_instance_id = cp3.siebel_instance_id)
explain from Toad
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 199,074 Bytes: 188 Cardinality: 1
15 TEMP TABLE TRANSFORMATION
14 HASH JOIN SEMI Cost: 199,074 Bytes: 188 Cardinality: 1
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 191,234 Bytes: 111,173,166 Cardinality: 726,622
9 HASH JOIN Cost: 162,751 Bytes: 108,444,416 Cardinality: 847,222
7 HASH JOIN Cost: 159,088 Bytes: 217,362,656 Cardinality: 1,940,738
5 HASH JOIN Cost: 134,635 Bytes: 108,065,443 Cardinality: 1,367,917
3 HASH JOIN Cost: 121,145 Bytes: 127,501,647 Cardinality: 2,712,801
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CMF Cost: 117,431 Bytes: 179,044,800 Cardinality: 5,425,600
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.ACCOUNT_CATEGORY_REF Cost: 4 Bytes: 518 Cardinality: 37
4 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CUSTOMER_ID_ACCT_MAP Cost: 9,229 Bytes: 87,546,656 Cardinality: 2,735,833
6 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CMF_PACKAGE Cost: 17,299 Bytes: 254,003,970 Cardinality: 7,697,090
8 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.PACKAGE_DEFINITION_VALUES Cost: 6 Bytes: 10,992 Cardinality: 687
10 TABLE ACCESS FULL TELEMAR.CMF_PACKAGES_FAT3C Cost: 17,248 Bytes: 419,471,250 Cardinality: 16,778,850
13 VIEW ARBOR. Cost: 3,638 Bytes: 116,664,100 Cardinality: 3,333,260
12 TABLE ACCESS FULL SYS.SYS_TEMP_0FD9D660C_D8362B9 Cost: 3,638 Bytes: 66,665,200 Cardinality: 3,333,260
explain from C
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT CHOOSECost: 631,186,428
19 FILTER
11 HASH JOIN Cost: 189,620 Bytes: 5,558,643 Cardinality: 36,331
9 HASH JOIN Cost: 189,425 Bytes: 11,401,688 Cardinality: 83,224
7 HASH JOIN Cost: 159,088 Bytes: 217,362,656 Cardinality: 1,940,738
5 HASH JOIN Cost: 134,635 Bytes: 108,065,443 Cardinality: 1,367,917
3 HASH JOIN Cost: 121,145 Bytes: 127,501,647 Cardinality: 2,712,801
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CMF Cost: 117,431 Bytes: 179,044,800 Cardinality: 5,425,600
2 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.ACCOUNT_CATEGORY_REF Cost: 4 Bytes: 518 Cardinality: 37
4 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CUSTOMER_ID_ACCT_MAP Cost: 9,229 Bytes: 87,546,656 Cardinality: 2,735,833
6 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.CMF_PACKAGE Cost: 17,299 Bytes: 254,003,970 Cardinality: 7,697,090
8 TABLE ACCESS FULL TELEMAR.CMF_PACKAGES_FAT3C Cost: 17,248 Bytes: 419,471,250 Cardinality: 16,778,850
10 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.PACKAGE_DEFINITION_VALUES Cost: 6 Bytes: 10,992 Cardinality: 687
18 HASH JOIN Cost: 17,368 Bytes: 53 Cardinality: 1
13 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ARBOR.CMF_PACKAGE Cost: 5 Bytes: 312 Cardinality: 12
12 INDEX RANGE SCAN ARBOR.CMF_PACKAGE_XCP_ACCOUNT_NO_KEY Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
17 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 17,362 Bytes: 345,222 Cardinality: 12,786
14 TABLE ACCESS FULL TELEMAR.CMF_PACKAGES_FAT3C Cost: 17,248 Bytes: 342 Cardinality: 19
16 BUFFER SORT Cost: 114 Bytes: 6,183 Cardinality: 687
15 TABLE ACCESS FULL ARBOR.PACKAGE_DEFINITION_VALUES Cost: 6 Bytes: 6,183 Cardinality: 687
Thanks in advanced.fbucco wrote:
I'm experiencing a very strange problem. I wrote the SQL below and when I execute through toad and sqlplus, oracle makes the star transformation, but when I execute it through C, it doens't makes the transformation. Any help are welcome.
Neither plan shows a "star" transformation - did you mean "temp table" transformation ?
It looks as if your C wrapper has taken out your materialize hint (among others).
Which version of Oracle are you using, by the way ? Is it the same in all cases, and is the client the same version as the server in all cases.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
To post code, statspack/AWR report, execution plans or trace files, start and end the section with the tag {noformat}{noformat} (lowercase, curly brackets, no spaces) so that the text appears in fixed format.
"Science is more than a body of knowledge; it is a way of thinking"
Carl Sagan -
My DB version is 10.2.0
One of my query takes long time for execution and here is the Old Query,
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM, HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0)
GELDEINGANG, HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM
( SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
FROM TRANS_HIST H1 ,
(SELECT BUCHUNGSGRUPPE, LFDNR, SICHERHEITBEZUG
FROM BUCHUNGSSCHL
WHERE STORNOMM=0) B1
WHERE H1.ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
AND (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR ( H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1)) ) HD,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
FROM TRANS_HIST H2,
(SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,
(SELECT * FROM ANS_PRCH WHERE RANGMM=1) A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR (+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 ) F1
WHERE ( (F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR) OR
F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM) AND H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' AND
H2.ERFASSDATUM >= TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM TRANS_HIST H3, (SELECT BUCHUNGSGRUPPE, LFDNR,
SICHERHEITBEZUG, NACHMIETVERTRAGE
FROM BUCHUNGSSCHL
WHERE STORNOMM=0) B3,
(SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,
(SELECT * FROM ANS_PRCH WHERE RANGMM=1) A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR= A.GLAEUBIGERNR (+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 ) F2
WHERE ( (F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR)
OR F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM)
AND H3.ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND
H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.22 0.22 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 469.61 1448.30 2874498 3017355 1 9
total 3 469.83 1448.53 2874498 3017355 1 9
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 62 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
9 SORT ORDER BY (cr=3017355 pr=2874498 pw=0 time=1448309418 us)
9 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=3017355 pr=2874498 pw=0 time=1448309191 us)
9 VIEW (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=906871801 us)
9 HASH GROUP BY (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=906871785 us)
1559 CONCATENATION (cr=1228085 pr=1175604 pw=0 time=564453620 us)
233 HASH JOIN (cr=614043 pr=589377 pw=0 time=562088377 us)
94 TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=505 us)
254136 HASH JOIN (cr=614014 pr=589377 pw=0 time=509476999 us)
497464 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586339 pr=562603 pw=0 time=65783878 us)
737515 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=27675 pr=26774 pw=0 time=18577731 us)
372656 TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6346 pr=5910 pw=0 time=408778 us)
737515 TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=20864 pw=0 time=2254657 us)
1326 HASH JOIN (cr=614042 pr=586227 pw=0 time=520726941 us)
94 TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=641 us)
221360 FILTER (cr=614013 pr=586227 pw=0 time=372791872 us)
221360 HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=614013 pr=586227 pw=0 time=372570499 us)
221360 HASH JOIN (cr=607668 pr=580286 pw=0 time=368077766 us)
243053 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586339 pr=563978 pw=0 time=1425434011 us)
737515 TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=16308 pw=0 time=8859226 us)
372656 TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6345 pr=5941 pw=0 time=1872464 us)
9 HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=1789270 pr=1698894 pw=0 time=541436637 us)
9 VIEW (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=213337882 us)
9 HASH UNIQUE (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=213337873 us)
748717 HASH JOIN (cr=586667 pr=562439 pw=0 time=104432018 us)
830 TABLE ACCESS FULL BUCHUNGSSCHL (cr=29 pr=0 pw=0 time=1042 us)
1241936 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=586638 pr=562439 pw=0 time=339666777 us)
9 VIEW (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=328097826 us)
9 HASH GROUP BY (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=328097809 us)
695373 CONCATENATION (cr=1202603 pr=1136455 pw=0 time=324453471 us)
0 HASH JOIN (cr=587003 pr=557994 pw=0 time=167168982 us)
744472 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=587003 pr=557994 pw=0 time=30622271 us)
0 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
0 TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
695373 FILTER (cr=615600 pr=578461 pw=0 time=157284464 us)
695373 HASH JOIN OUTER (cr=615600 pr=578461 pw=0 time=156589072 us)
695373 HASH JOIN (cr=609255 pr=572518 pw=0 time=150571393 us)
744472 TABLE ACCESS FULL TRANS_HIST (cr=587926 pr=556115 pw=0 time=31820718 us)
737515 TABLE ACCESS FULL FRD_ACCT (cr=21329 pr=16403 pw=0 time=3696334 us)
372656 TABLE ACCESS FULL ANS_PRCH (cr=6345 pr=5943 pw=0 time=391928 us)I tried fine tuning the query using "With Clause" but landed up with oracle error, which prevents me from using with clause inside a paranthesis.
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM, HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0)
GELDEINGANG, HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM
( WITH HIST_VIEW AS (SELECT GLAEUBIGERNR,FORDNR,FORDERGNR,MAHN_NUM,BUCHUNGSGRUPPE,LFDNR,STORNOMM,ERFASSDATUM,BETRAG
FROM TRANS_HIST H
WHERE ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND (H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR ( H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100))),
FORD_VIEW AS (SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,ANS_PRCH A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR(+) AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+) AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0 AND A.RANGMM=1)
(SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
FROM HIST_VIEW H1 ,BUCHUNGSSCHL B1
WHERE B1.STORNOMM=0 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
AND (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888' OR (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1))) HD,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
FROM HIST_VIEW H2,FORD_VIEW F1
WHERE ((F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR) OR
F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM) AND H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') ) HA2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM, SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM HIST_VIEW H3, BUCHUNGSSCHL B3,FORD_VIEW F2
WHERE ((F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR
AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR) OR F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM) AND B3.STORNOMM=0
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE AND
H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC )
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesisIf you format your code it makes it far easier to spot mistakes...
WITH HIST_VIEW AS (SELECT GLAEUBIGERNR,FORDNR,FORDERGNR,MAHN_NUM,BUCHUNGSGRUPPE,LFDNR,STORNOMM,ERFASSDATUM,BETRAG
FROM TRANS_HIST H
WHERE ERFASSDATUM >=TO_DATE('01.10'||TO_CHAR(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-9),'YYYY')||' 00.00.00','DD.MM.YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
AND ( H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
OR (H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100)
FORD_VIEW AS (SELECT F.GLAEUBIGERNR,F.FORDNR,F.FORDERGNR,A.MAHN_NUM
FROM FRD_ACCT F,ANS_PRCH A
WHERE F.GLAEUBIGERNR=A.GLAEUBIGERNR(+)
AND F.FORDNR=A.FORDNR(+)
AND F.FORDERGNR=A.FORDERGNR(+)
AND NVL(F.INDIVIDUALFLAG,0)=0
AND A.RANGMM=1
SELECT HD.DATUM DATUM
,HA2.GELDEINGAENGE_INSG-NVL(HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE,0) GELDEINGANG
,HA3.VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM (SELECT DISTINCT(TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')) DATUM
FROM HIST_VIEW H1
,BUCHUNGSSCHL B1
WHERE B1.STORNOMM=0
AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE
AND H1.LFDNR = B1.LFDNR
AND ( H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
OR (H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999 AND H1.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100 AND B1.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1)
) HD,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM
,SUM(BETRAG) GELDEINGAENGE_INSG
FROM HIST_VIEW H2
,FORD_VIEW F1
WHERE (
( F1.GLAEUBIGERNR= H2.GLAEUBIGERNR
AND F1.FORDNR=H2.FORDNR
AND F1.FORDERGNR=H2.FORDERGNR
OR
F1.MAHN_NUM = H2.MAHN_NUM
AND H2.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = '8888'
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')
) HA2,
(SELECT TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM') DATUM
,SUM(BETRAG) VERWERTUNGSERLOESE
FROM HIST_VIEW H3
,BUCHUNGSSCHL B3
,FORD_VIEW F2
WHERE (
( F2.GLAEUBIGERNR=H3.GLAEUBIGERNR
AND F2.FORDNR=H3.FORDNR
AND F2.FORDERGNR=H3.FORDERGNR
OR
F2.MAHN_NUM = H3.MAHN_NUM
AND B3.STORNOMM=0
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE = B3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE
AND H3.LFDNR = B3.LFDNR
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE > 5999
AND H3.BUCHUNGSGRUPPE < 7100
AND (B3.SICHERHEITBEZUG = 1 OR B3.NACHMIETVERTRAGE =1)
GROUP BY TO_CHAR(ERFASSDATUM,'YYYY/MM')
) HA3
WHERE HD.DATUM=HA2.DATUM (+)
AND HD.DATUM=HA3.DATUM (+)
ORDER BY DATUM ASC
) <--- What's this doing on the end?Remove that last bracket and you should be ok.
I took the liberty of putting the subquery factoring at the beginning, so see if that works. -
ORA-32034: unsupported use of WITH clause-issue
hello all,
i am facing some issue when i use with clause and union all operator.
i have created a dummy code to solve this problem..
my code is ----------
with dept_1 as
(select deptno d1 from detp9 where deptno = 20)
select empno from emp9 e,dept_d1 where e.empno = dept_1.d1
UNION ALL
with dept_1 as
(select deptno d2 from detp9 where deptno = 30)
select empno from emp9 e,dept_d2 where e.empno = dept_2.d2.
when i ran this i gort a message-
ORA-32034: unsupported use of WITH clause.
please help me to solve this iisue..
when i ran it separatly without using union/union all it ran sucessfully..
thanks in advance..923315 wrote:
hello all,
i am facing some issue when i use with clause and union all operator.
i have created a dummy code to solve this problem..
my code is ----------
with dept_1 as
(select deptno d1 from detp9 where deptno = 20)
select empno from emp9 e,dept_d1 where e.empno = dept_1.d1
UNION ALL
with dept_1 as
(select deptno d2 from detp9 where deptno = 30)
select empno from emp9 e,dept_d2 where e.empno = dept_2.d2.
when i ran this i gort a message-
ORA-32034: unsupported use of WITH clause.
please help me to solve this iisue..
when i ran it separatly without using union/union all it ran sucessfully..
thanks in advance..Well, i don't see anything about these queries that makes sense.
You are essentially joining emp and dept on EMPNO to DEPTNO ... that doesn't usually make any sense.
How about you step back from the query which is almost certainly incorrect, and explain your tables, their data and what you need as output?
Cheers,
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to use the variable value "ALL"
Hello all, I'm trying to use the value "all" for a selection variable in a Web Interface so that to have no restrictions for that specific variable and that all the rows are shown on the interface. Unfortunately it does not seem to be working because
-
Error Screen output without connection to user DYNPRO_SEND_IN_BACKGROUND
Hi Experts I am trying to debbug a BADI (for shc) in SRM 7.0 with external debugger. I placed a breakpoint in the BADI, and logged into the portal screen,it is independent portal. when i start to create the shc i get the error: Screen output w
-
Safari 3 backspace goes back space does to bottom of the page
when im in a text input box such as google search and i say for example make a mistake, but when i hit delete (backspace) to delete the mistake it goes back like when you hit the back button in the browser. can someone please help me fix this. also w
-
Hi, I am not able to open business rules. I get this error. Exception occurred. Please check your log file for details. What could be the reason? Regards, Ragav.
-
I have a 2008 MacBook (non-unibody). It will boot to the custom desktop pic, but the Apple menu and dock are not available. I cannot boot into safe mode. I can boot from the OS DVD and run disk repair, but that has not helped the issue. Any advice?