Max. No. of processes per user in Linux(Form6i related)

I have problem with Form6i in Linux when the resource is used up. I want to find a way to limit the number of form server processes. In other UNIX they is a kernel parameter to limit the Max processes per user. Any idea to do that in Linux?
Thanks!
null

That you have not reached this limit indicates that you are doing a good job!
Tell the interviewer that if the limit is reached, then there is a design error.
If the interviewer presses harder, then there are two technical solutions. The first is in the authorizations tab of PFCG to use the "read old and merge new" option via the "Expert options". This you are probably doing hence you don't have the problem, but it can also be triggered manually within the menus in the authorization data.
There is one more joker you can play, but you must first tell the interviewer that they are using "Edit old data" to support a design error in the way they build and maintain roles.
Cheers,
Julius

Similar Messages

  • How to change the maximum number of process per user in BW ?

    Hi,
    Do you know how to change the maximum number of process allowed per user ?
    With RSRT we can customize the number of process per query but I don't know where we can customize the maximum number of process per user.
    In fact, my production environment reach always the max number of process available in SM50...
    Thanks a lot

    Hi,
    A user is not have the No. of processor but a work process can handle N No. of users. If a user hit any transaction v acn say from  a list of N worl proceesor which has been taken the work.
    Correct if I am wrong.
    Regards
    Syed.

  • Limit dialog processes per user

    Hello,
    We would like to know if it possible to limit dialog processes per user.
    We have a user that he runs every dialog processes without permissions and we would like to limit the number of such processes to, for example, 5. This processes are an RFC for external java program.
    Thanks and regards,
    Néstor.

    <removed by moderator>
    Do not copy and paste. Always quote the source
    Read the "Rules of Engagement"
    Edited by: Juan Reyes on Jan 12, 2010 9:39 AM

  • Max no of profiles per user

    HI everybody
    An interviewer asked  that you have to assign 10 roles to user,but 9 roles it self the max no of (312) profiles, are reached.then how to assign 10 th role
    what procedure you follow.Of course i have this doubt since sap career started but i was not much interest to find answer
    I read  410993 note  and searched all the stuff  on net but didn't get solution.
    thanks in advance.
    regards
    siddu

    That you have not reached this limit indicates that you are doing a good job!
    Tell the interviewer that if the limit is reached, then there is a design error.
    If the interviewer presses harder, then there are two technical solutions. The first is in the authorizations tab of PFCG to use the "read old and merge new" option via the "Expert options". This you are probably doing hence you don't have the problem, but it can also be triggered manually within the menus in the authorization data.
    There is one more joker you can play, but you must first tell the interviewer that they are using "Edit old data" to support a design error in the way they build and maintain roles.
    Cheers,
    Julius

  • Maximum number of processes a user can run

    Is there a parameter that defines the maximum number of processes that a user can run?

    hi,
    there are no maximum process per user. There is maximum session per user, by default, it is 6. But you can change it. But usually, SAP Go Live Check would suggest you to reduce it to 2 or 3.
    ardhian
    http://ardhian.kioslinux.com
    http://sapbasis.wordpress.com

  • Restrict access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis?

    My application restricts access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis.
    Here is my application logic...
    1. A User can only edit items they own.
    2. A Super-User can edit all items
    So, when a user logs in, I use a post-authentication process to set the user ID to an application level item.
    Now, for example, to have an edit button display on a page, I need to check the item's owner ID against the application level user ID...and check to see if this user is on the Super User list via a query.(which could be set to another application level item upon login...I guess)
    Question...What is the best way to do this? Conditional display? Authorization scheme?
    Would something like the following work for a Conditional Display?
    Condition: SQL Expression
    &USER_ID.=&P6_ITEM_OWNER_ID. OR USER_ID in (select USER_ID from table where USER_ID=&USER_ID.)
    How would I do this with an Authorization Scheme? (I like the idea of updating the logic in single location...but I'm not sure if it is possible because I have to check PX_OWNER_ID would be different on each page.)

    Hi Denes,
    Thanks for your code which allows user to edit (if authorized) and view (if not).
    But some how - I do not get the image to show up - instead it show a small underline.
    From SQL point of view - here is what I get - when i run the sql
    '<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">',2,CR TEST,,,,dune2.cit.cornell.edu,CRDMTEST.CIT.CORNELL.EDU,PSPROD,,,CRDMTEST
    Here is my wrap_image function
    create or replace function wrap_image(p_user_name in varchar2,p_dm_name_id in number)
    return varchar2 IS
    v boolean := False;
    ret_val varchar2(1000);
    begin
    dbms_output.put_line('user='||p_user_name);
    dbms_output.put_line('dm_name='||p_dm_name_id);
    -- Check authorization if the user is super user - return true, else if he has edit priv on dm_name_id - return true - else false
    v:=ACL_DMTOOLS_DM_PRIV(p_user_name,p_dm_name_id);
    if v then
    ret_val := '<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">';
    ret_val := ''''||ret_val||'''';
    dbms_output.put_line('TRUE');
    else
    ret_val := '';
    dbms_output.put_line('FALSE');
    end if;
    return ret_val;
    end;
    Thanks for your great educational site.
    Regards
    atul

  • Throttling a file adapter to consume a max number of files per minute

    Is there a way to design a file adapter to throttle its processing bandwidth.
    A simple use case scenario is describes as follows;
    A File Adapter can only consumes a max of 5 files per minute. The producer average throughput is 3 files per minute but during peak times it can send 100 files per min. The peak times occur during end of year or quarterly accounting periods. If the consumer consumes more than 5 files per min the integrity of the environment and data is compromised.
    The SLA for the adapter is to :
    - Each file will be processed within 2 seconds.
    - Maximum File Transactions Per minute is 5
    An example is as follows.
    The producer sends 20 files to its staging directory within a minute. The consumer only processes 5 of these files in the first minute, sleeps then wakes up to consume the next 5 files in the second minute. This process is repeated until all files are processed.
    The producer can send another batch of files when ever it likes. So in the second minute the producer can send another 70 files. The consumer will throttle the files so it only processes 5 of these files every minute.

    Hi,
    If you have a polling frequency set to 2 secs..then controlling it to read only five files a min is difficult.?You can have the polling frequecy changed to 12secs
    or u can schedule a BPEL for every min and use synchronous read operation and loop it 5 times to read 5 files.

  • An OS-Intergrated place to store per-user application configuration files.

    A Chairde,
    I'm developing an application that could be deployed on multiple platforms. I'm looking for a location to store per-user configuration files in a OS-integrated way.
    I use a utility class to determine the OS of the users machine. I know from experience that Windows NT5+ likes to store per-user settings/configurations in the %APPDATA% path (which is usually C:\Users\<username>\Appdata\Roaming\<vendor>\<software> etc.) I'm using a call to the environment labels to determine it's location.
    I'm a linux user myself, so I'm aware that most UNIX based Operating Systems like to store personal configurations in hidden folders in the user's home directory (ex /home/<username>/.<application> etc.), Obviously, I'm using a call to the system property user.home to determine that location.
    My Question is in relation to Mac OS and Mac OS X, where would it be a safe location to store per-user configurations? I know OS X is BSD/UNIX based so is it safe to assume to store them as a hidden subfolder of the user.home directory? What about Mac OS classic? Where are per-user settings stored, or is it like Windows 9x and NT4 and lacks proper multi-user setups (although NT4 is somewhat more prepared then 9x) ?
    It would be much appreciated if anybody has any ideas.
    Is Mise,
    Seán Mac Aodha
    PS. I'm not using Javas Property files etc. I've rolled my own exchangeable format for storing key,value pairs.

    I've used databases in the past to store local files but clients have sometimes run into trouble when the database daemon goes down or doesnt start-up normally because of a "improper" shutdown etc.
    In my own implementation of "Settings Files" i have serialized hashtables marked with appropriate metadata stored to the users "application data", a backup or original copy of those settings in the common directory shared by my application framework and then in a networked enviroment, the Settings can be hosted on a database server, so the user can travel between client machines and keep their settings (and files) with them.
    I have, with a bit of googling, come across the most obvious page i should have looked at in regards to Apple Mac OS X
    http://developer.apple.com/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFileSystem/Articles/WhereToPutFiles.html
    According to Apple's guidlines, the most suitable place to store User configuration files is in the ~/Library/Application Support/<Application Name> directory.
    and for System-wide configuration files, /Library/Application Support/<Application Name> rather then storing them with the application in the /Applications directory.

  • Transaction is being processed by user - ITSM WebUI

    I have integrated the Test Workbench with ITSM Incident Management. SMIN is customized to YMIN for this purpose.
    Now I go to stwb_work and report a defect by clicking on "Create" under status. I am able to create a Message as usual.
    Now I click on the message and open the same in WebUI, and try to edit it says "Transaction XXXXXXXX is being processed by user.
    I tried closing the Test workbench transaction and still it says the same.
    SM12 shows a lock entry for "CRMD_ORDERADM_H" and when I delete the entry, I am able to edit. Is there a way to release this lock after I have exited the message in the stwb_work -> Create Message area?
    Also if I finally edit the transaction after some time on the WebUi and change the user status, this is not getting reflected in the test workbench "Message Overview"
    Could you kindly let me know what could be a possible reason for this?

    Hello Ranjih,
    As per note 1821038 - Error "Transaction XXXXXXXXXX is being processed by user XXX" when try to edit message in CRM Web UI have you maintained his ?
    For first case:
    Please add the below entry which will put the document in "Display" mode after clicking "Save" Button.
    Call transaction SM30.
    Add an entry to table AGS_WORK_CUSTOM with NAME = 'IM_READONLY_AFTER_SAVE' and VALUE = 'X'.
    BR,
    K.

  • System usage per user

    Hi Security Experts,
    Our company have a SAP system version ECC 5.0 and right now we are making an analysis related to the quantity of users and the quality of the system usage per user, so the question here is if there's a way to know how much resources does an user consume? this is, time connected, transactions used. This is in order to separate the occasional users from the operating users?
    I'll appreciate a lot your help.
    Best Regards,
    Erik Espinosa

    Hi
    ST03N is your solution.
    There you find every minute detail for performance in the SAP system.
    You can check User Profiles for days , weeks and months individually to check the response times, data executions from the database etc.
    You can also find the processes/ transactions that take the highest memory consumption.
    Apart from this, an earlywatch report from the system would also assist you in such an analysis.
    I hope this helps
    Regards
    CHEN

  • Limit BTC per user

    Hi,
    SAP R3 on my system, I need to limit the amount of work processes BTC per user, because some users launch several processes at the same time causing inconvenience in the whole system.
    Is there any parameter or report that can control this situation?
    Regards
    Marco Sousa

    Hi,
    As per my knowledge, there is no such option where you can limit the usuage of BTC work process as per user. The alternate would be firstly educate users strictly not to run any huge reports in background during the peak time or remove the access of executing in background. Other thing is look at the possibility of increasing the BTC process if bussiness requirement needs them to execute in background. If resources are not sufficient to increase the BTC process then configure the operation modes and convert the dialog process to BTC process.
    Regards,
    Sharath

  • Define Output type and Local destination per user

    Hi Gurus,
    Nowadays us have defined Output type by Sales Organiztion/Order Type (S_TCODE = VV11).
    Is possible define Output type and Local destination per user?. How to do?.
    thanks and best regards,
    Wilson

    Hi Wilson
    As per my understanding of requirement: you want output type and Local destination for each SAP End user (i.e. who is processing sales order) not the customer. If this is the requirement, we have two solution for it:
    1) If for a particular region/sales district customer are contacting to one particular destination, then create access sequence with output type/order type/sales district. Means for one sales district one Local destination. If sales district is big area and you have many local destination with in that, then you can divide it into regions.
    2) Ask your ABAPer to create a Z table and maintain Local destination for all Users. And amend the print program such that before saving the output entry into NAST table, based on SY-UNAME(user's id), fetch the printer (local destination) from Z table and update the NAST table accordingly.
    As per my observations, option 2 is simpler and more effective.
    try and revert.

  • Assigning Material Group per User

    Hi SAP Experts! =)
    Pls Help! does anybody have an idea how can I assign a Material Group per User. This is for authorization purposes. What I just know, is to Assign just one Material Group per user through Parameter ID MKL. This will only solve my problem if a User will only have access for a Single Material Group.
    Do you know a way how to Assign access for Multiple Material Groups? I would want to use this for the PR/PO process, so a User will only purchase Materials under his/her assigned Material Groups. =)
    Mik

    HI,
    Usually we give a star symbol for the authorisation object of material groups means the user is authorised for all the material groups.
    In case if you want to give multiple material groups for the user then we have to specify the material groups instaed of the star symbol.
    You can check the users authorisaion against the user ID in tcode SUIM.(Users with complex selection)
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran

  • Maximum Number of Sessions per User

    I am using OAM 11.1.1.5.0 running on Solaris 10. When we change the "Maximum Number of Sessions per User" to 1 (per customer requirement), a user is restricted to having one active OAM session at a time (as expected). However, if the user does not explicitly log out (e.g. they just close their browser), they are unable to log back in to OAM until their existing OAM session times-out/expires. Given the above max sessions of 1 requirement, is it possible to config OAM to auto-kill the user's session and create a new one if they attempt to login before their initial OAM session times-out/expires? This was possible in Sun's Access Manager. Is it possible in Oracle's OAM? Thank you in advance for your reply.

    Hi,
    Maximum session per user 0-9 and how can configure see the below link:-
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/97/76a341ac57ef0be10000000a1550b0/content.htm
    Regards,
    Anil

  • Auto logout time different per users

    Hello
    we are using almost all modules in ECC. So we have 2 kinds of SAP users, the administrative ones and the operational ones.
    The administrative ones is using SAP all the day by creating purchase orders, process orders or recording control results by example. When they make an activities in SAP they can completed the task without any interruption.
    But we have as well operational users who are using SAP to make physical activities like to place pallet in the warehouse with WM functions and to weight a drum from the PI-sheet in PPPI.
    The auto logout is after 15 minutes of inactivity and I don't find how to set it up per users. In deed, the operator in production needs time between each weighing meaning stick label, remove the previous drum, take the new one, write information on the paper batch record, ... The time between 2 actions in SAP is more than 15 minutes. So the operator is automatically logout between each weighing and it takes around 2 minutes to log again and reload the Pi-sheet. By example, to weight 46 drums the operator will lost more than 1,5 hour. It's not acceptable by the production.It increases the production time of 16%.
    How can I set up a auto logout time to 15 minutes or less for the administrative users and 1 hour for the production users located in a protected area ( no access by external people) ?
    thanks in advance for your answer
    regards
    V Noirot
    PPPI team lead

    Hi,
    You can increase the logout time for the endusers. But the power users, throughout the day they will be using the system. This time increase will not affect much on the power users. If you are saving some productive hours by increasing this time out means, you can do this. But it will act similar for both the users.
    regards,
    V. Suresh

Maybe you are looking for