Memory Leak using CertOpenStore on Windows 2008 R2

I have a program (runs both 32 and 64 bit ) that when using CertOpenStore results in a memory leak on Windows 2008 R2 only (I haven't tried 2012, but this code has run for years on 2000, 2003, 2008 without issues)
Sample code to reproduce the issue:
int main( int argc, char** argv )
HCERTSTORE store;
int go = 1;
while( go ){
store = CertOpenStore(
CERT_STORE_PROV_SYSTEM_A,
0,
0,
CERT_SYSTEM_STORE_LOCAL_MACHINE | CERT_STORE_OPEN_EXISTING_FLAG,
"MY" );
if( store ){
//if( !CertCloseStore( store , CERT_CLOSE_STORE_CHECK_FLAG ) ){
if( !CertCloseStore( store , CERT_CLOSE_STORE_FORCE_FLAG ) ){
if( GetLastError() == CRYPT_E_PENDING_CLOSE ){
printf( "!" );
else{
go = 0;
else{
go = 0;
Sleep( 10 );
return 0;
The callstack for allocations pretty much are all like this  (this is from a 32 bit process on a 2008R2 box)
      HEAP_ENTRY Size Prev Flags    UserPtr UserSize - state
        02e75af0 000f 0000  [00]   02e75b08    0005e - (busy)
        7724dff2 ntdll!RtlAllocateHeap+0x00000274
        745f6017 AcLayers!malloc+0x00000079
        7460dc96 AcLayers!NS_VirtualRegistry::MakePath+0x00000056
        7460e817 AcLayers!NS_VirtualRegistry::CVirtualRegistry::OpenKeyW+0x000000a9
        7460f21a AcLayers!NS_VirtualRegistry::APIHook_RegOpenKeyExW+0x00000036
        743d2641 AcGenral!NS_WRPMitigation::APIHook_RegOpenKeyExW+0x00000024
        7527a246 crypt32!RegOpenHKCUKeyExU+0x00000055
        7527de26 crypt32!OpenSubKeyEx+0x00000108
        7527e4d8 crypt32!OpenSubKey+0x00000015
        7527ed88 crypt32!OpenSystemRegPathKey+0x00000033
        75281a2f crypt32!EnumPhysicalStore+0x00000162
        75281d0e crypt32!I_CertDllOpenSystemStoreProvW+0x0000015c
        752c9fce crypt32!I_CertDllOpenSystemStoreProvA+0x0000006c
        7527e49a crypt32!CertOpenStore+0x0000010e
Anyone have any ideas of a hotfix available for this?
thanks

Might ask them here about this.
Windows Desktop Dev forums on MSDN
Regards, Dave Patrick ....
Microsoft Certified Professional
Microsoft MVP [Windows]
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.

Similar Messages

  • What is the best way to deal with memory leak issue in sql server 2008 R2

    What is the best way to deal with memory leak issue in sql server 2008 R2.

    What is the best way to deal with memory leak issue in sql server 2008 R2.
    I have heard of memory leak in OS that too because of some external application or rouge drivers SQL server 2008 R2 if patched to latest SP and CU ( may be if required) does not leaks memory.
    Are you in opinion that since SQL is taking lot of memory and then not releasing it is a memory leak.If so this is not a memory leak but default behavior .You need to set proper value for max server memory in sp_configure to limit buffer pool usage.However
    sql can take more memory from outside buffer pool if linked server ,CLR,extended stored procs XML are heavily utilized
    Any specific issue you are facing
    Please mark this reply as the answer or vote as helpful, as appropriate, to make it useful for other readers

  • Memory leak using repeater tag

    Hi,
    I am trying to show a report that has 33113 rows using a repeater tag, but i get the following error: "An error has occurred: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError".
    I am using the pageFlow to bind a ArrayList that already contains the rows.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks a lot.

    Link to Microsoft Connect issue
    https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/1045459/memory-leak-using-windows-accessibility-tools-microsoft-narrator-windows-speech-recognition-with-net-applications
    Link to Microsoft Community post
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-performance/memory-leak-using-windows-accessibility-tools/8b32a81c-f828-415c-aec8-34e3106f9cb0?tm=1420469245606

  • Nasty memory leak using sockets inside threads

    In short, any time I create or use a socket inside a worker thread, that Thread object instance will never be garbage collected. The socket does not need to be connected or bound, it doesn't matter whether I close the socket or not, and it doesn't matter whether I create the Socket object inside the thread or not. As I said, it's nasty.
    I initially encountered this memory leak using httpclient (which creates a worker thread for every connect() call), but it is very easy to reproduce with a small amount of stand-alone code. I'm running this test on Windows, and I encounter this memory leak using the latest 1.5 and 1.6 JDK's. I'm using the NetBeans 5.5 profiler to verify which objects are not being freed.
    Here's how to reproduce it with an unbound socket created inside a worker thread:
    public class Test {
         public static class TestRun extends Thread {
              public void run() {
                   new Socket();
         public static void main(String[] strArgs) throws Exception {
              for(;;) {
                   (new TestRun()).start();
                   Thread.sleep(10);
    }Here's how to reproduce it with a socket created outside the thread and used inside the worker thread:
    public class Test {
         public static class TestRun extends Thread {
              Socket s;
              public TestRun(Socket s) { this.s = s; }
              public void run() {
                   try {
                        s.bind(new InetSocketAddress(0));
                        s.close();
                   } catch(Exception e) {}
         public static void main(String[] strArgs) throws Exception {
              for(;;) {
                   (new TestRun(new Socket())).start();
                   Thread.sleep(10);
    }Here's how to reproduce it implementing Runnable instead of extending Thread:
    public class Test {
         public static class TestRun implements Runnable {
              public void run() {
                   Socket s = new Socket();
                   try { s.close(); } catch(Exception e) {}
         public static void main(String[] strArgs) throws Exception {
              for(;;) {
                   (new Thread(new TestRun())).start();
                   Thread.sleep(10);
    }I've played with this a lot, and no matter what I do the Thread instance leaks if I create/use a socket inside it. The Socket instance gets cleaned up properly, as well as the TestRun instance when it's implementing Runnable, but the Thread instance never gets cleaned up. I can't see anything that would be holding a reference to it, so I can only imagine it's a problem with the JVM.
    Please let me know if you can help me out with this,
    Sean

    Find out what is being leaked. In the sample programs, add something like this:
        static int loop_count;
            while (true) {
                if (++count >= 1000) {
              System.gc();
              Thread.sleep(500); // In case gc is async
              System.gc();
              Thread.sleep(500);
              System.exit(0);
            }Then run with java -Xrunhprof:heap=sites YourProgram
    At program exit you get the file java.hprof.txt which contains something like this towards the end of the file:
              percent          live          alloc'ed  stack class
    rank   self  accum     bytes objs     bytes  objs trace name
        1  0.47%  0.47%       736    5       736     5 300036 char[]
        2  0.39%  0.87%       616    3       616     3 300000 java.lang.Thread
        3  0.30%  1.17%       472    2       472     2 300011 java.lang.ThreadLocal$ThreadLocalMap$Entry[]
        4  0.27%  1.43%       416    2       416     2 300225 java.net.InetAddress$Cache$Type[]See, only three live Thread objects (the JVM allocates a few threads internally, plus there is the thread running main()). No leak there. Your application probably has some type of object that it's retaining. Look at "live bytes" and "live objs" to see where your memory is going. The "stack trace" column refers to the "TRACE nnnnn"'s earlier in the file, look at those to see where the leaked objects are allocated.
    Other quickies to track allocation:
    Print stats at program exit:
    java -Xaprof YourProgram
    If your JDK comes with the demo "heapViewer.dll" (or
    heapViewer.so or whatever dynamic libraries are called on your system):
    java -agentpath:"c:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0\demo\jvmti\heapViewer\lib\heapViewer.dll" YourProgram
    Will print out statistics at program exit or when you hit Control-\ (Unix) or Control-Break (Windows).

  • Bug:4705928 PLSQL: Memory leak using small varrays

    We have Oracle version 10.2.0.1.0
    We have a problem with a procedure.
    In our scenario we make use of VARRAY in the procedure to pass some filter parameters to a select distinct querying a view made on three tables.
    Unfotunately not always execution it is successful.
    Sometimes it returns wrong value (0 for the count parameter), sometimes (rarely) the server stops working.
    We suspect that this is caused by a bug fixed in versione 10.2.0.3.0
    Bug:4705928 PLSQL: Memory leak using small varrays when trimming the whole collection and inserting into it in a loop
    We suspect this becasue we made two procedure the first (spProductCount) uses a function (fnProductFilter) to calculate the values of a varray and passes them into the select,
    while in the second procedure (spProductCount2) parameters are passed directly into the statement without varray
    and there are failures only in the first procedure.
    On the other hand on another server 10.2.0.1.0 we never have this problem.
    The instance manifesting the bug runs under shared mode, while the other is under dedicated mode.
    Turning the first one to dedicated mode makes the bugs disapear.
    Unfortunately this is not a solution.
    In the sample there are the three table with all constraints, the view, tha varray custom type, the function and the two procedures.
    Is there someone that may examine our sample and tell us if the pl/sql code corresponds to the bug desciption.
    We also want to know if it's possibile that the same server running under different mode (SHARED/DEDICATED) doesn't behave the same way.
    The tables:
    --Products
    CREATE TABLE "Products" (
         "Image" BLOB
         , "CatalogId" RAW(16)
         , "ProductId" RAW(16)
         , "MnemonicId" NVARCHAR2(50) DEFAULT ''
         , "ProductParentId" RAW(16)
    ALTER TABLE "Products"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_Products_M04" CHECK ("CatalogId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "Products"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_Products_M05" CHECK ("ProductId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "Products"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "PK_Products"
    PRIMARY KEY ("ProductId")
    CREATE INDEX "IX_Products"
    ON "Products" ("CatalogId", "MnemonicId")
    CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "UK_Products"
    ON "Products" (DECODE("MnemonicId", NULL, NULL, RAWTOHEX("CatalogId") || "MnemonicId"))
    --Languages
    CREATE TABLE "Languages" (
         "Description" NVARCHAR2(250)
         , "IsStandard" NUMBER(1)
         , "LanguageId" RAW(16)
         , "MnemonicId" NVARCHAR2(12)
    ALTER TABLE "Languages"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_Languages_M01" CHECK ("LanguageId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "Languages"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_Languages_M05" CHECK ("MnemonicId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "Languages"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "PK_Languages"
    PRIMARY KEY ("LanguageId")
    ALTER TABLE "Languages"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "UK_Languages"
    UNIQUE ("MnemonicId")
    --ProductDesc
    CREATE TABLE "ProductDesc" (
         "Comment" NCLOB
         , "PlainComment" NCLOB
         , "Description" NVARCHAR2(250)
         , "DescriptionText" NCLOB
         , "PlainDescriptionText" NCLOB
         , "LanguageId" NVARCHAR2(12)
         , "ProductId" RAW(16)
    ALTER TABLE "ProductDesc"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_ProductDescM01" CHECK ("LanguageId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "ProductDesc"
         ADD CONSTRAINT "NN_ProductDescM02" CHECK ("ProductId" IS NOT NULL)
    ALTER TABLE "ProductDesc"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "PK_ProductDesc"
    PRIMARY KEY ("ProductId", "LanguageId")
    ALTER TABLE "ProductDesc"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "FK_ProductDesc1"
    FOREIGN KEY("ProductId") REFERENCES "Products" ("ProductId")
    ALTER TABLE "ProductDesc"
    ADD CONSTRAINT "FK_ProductDesc2"
    FOREIGN KEY("LanguageId") REFERENCES "Languages" ("MnemonicId")
    /The view:
    --ProductView
    CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW "vwProducts"
    AS
         SELECT
               "Products"."CatalogId"
              , "ProductDesc"."Comment"
              , "ProductDesc"."PlainComment"
              , "ProductDesc"."Description"
              , "ProductDesc"."DescriptionText"
              , "ProductDesc"."PlainDescriptionText"
              , "Products"."Image"
              , "Languages"."MnemonicId" "LanguageId"
              , "Products"."MnemonicId"
              , "Products"."ProductId"
              , "Products"."ProductParentId"
              , TRIM(NVL("ProductDesc"."Description" || ' ', '') || NVL("ParentDescriptions"."Description", '')) "FullDescription"
         FROM "Products"
         CROSS JOIN "Languages"
         LEFT OUTER JOIN "ProductDesc"
         ON "Products"."ProductId" = "ProductDesc"."ProductId"
         AND "ProductDesc"."LanguageId" = "Languages"."MnemonicId"
         LEFT OUTER JOIN "ProductDesc" "ParentDescriptions"
         ON "Products"."ProductParentId" = "ParentDescriptions"."ProductId"
         AND ("ParentDescriptions"."LanguageId" = "Languages"."MnemonicId")
    /The varray:
    --CustomType VARRAY
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE Varray_Params IS VARRAY(100) OF NVARCHAR2(1000);
    /The function:
    --FilterFunction
    CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION "fnProductFilter" (
         parCatalogId "Products"."CatalogId"%TYPE,
         parLanguageId                    NVARCHAR2 := N'it-IT',
         parFilterValues                    OUT Varray_Params
    RETURN INTEGER
    AS
         varSqlCondition                    VARCHAR2(32000);
         varSqlConditionValues          NVARCHAR2(32000);
         varSql                              NVARCHAR2(32000);
         varDbmsCursor                    INTEGER;
         varDbmsResult                    INTEGER;
         varSeparator                    VARCHAR2(2);
         varFilterValue                    NVARCHAR2(1000);
         varCount                         INTEGER;
    BEGIN
         varSqlCondition := '(T_Product."CatalogId" = HEXTORAW(:parentId)) AND (T_Product."LanguageId" = :languageId )';
         varSqlConditionValues := CHR(39) || TO_CHAR(parCatalogId) || CHR(39) || N', ' || CHR(39 USING NCHAR_CS) || parLanguageId || CHR(39 USING NCHAR_CS);
         parFilterValues := Varray_Params();
         varSql := N'SELECT FilterValues.column_value FilterValue FROM TABLE(Varray_Params(' || varSqlConditionValues || N')) FilterValues';
         BEGIN
              varDbmsCursor := dbms_sql.open_cursor;
              dbms_sql.parse(varDbmsCursor, varSql, dbms_sql.native);
              dbms_sql.define_column(varDbmsCursor, 1, varFilterValue, 1000);
              varDbmsResult := dbms_sql.execute(varDbmsCursor);
              varCount := 0;
              LOOP
                   IF (dbms_sql.fetch_rows(varDbmsCursor) > 0) THEN
                        varCount := varCount + 1;
                        dbms_sql.column_value(varDbmsCursor, 1, varFilterValue);
                        parFilterValues.extend(1);
                        parFilterValues(varCount) := varFilterValue;
                   ELSE
                        -- No more rows to copy
                        EXIT;
                   END IF;
              END LOOP;
              dbms_sql.close_cursor(varDbmsCursor);
         EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
              dbms_sql.close_cursor(varDbmsCursor);
              RETURN 0;
         END;
         FOR i in parFilterValues.first .. parFilterValues.last LOOP
              varSeparator := ', ';
         END LOOP;
         RETURN 1;
    END;
    /The procedures:
    --Procedure presenting anomaly\bug
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE "spProductCount" (
         parCatalogId "Products"."CatalogId"%TYPE,
         parLanguageId NVARCHAR2 := N'it-IT',
         parRecords OUT NUMBER
    AS
         varFilterValues Varray_Params;
         varResult INTEGER;
         varSqlTotal VARCHAR2(32000);
    BEGIN
         parRecords := 0;
         varResult := "fnProductFilter"(parCatalogId, parLanguageId, varFilterValues);
         varSqlTotal := 'BEGIN
         SELECT count(DISTINCT T_Product."ProductId") INTO :parCount FROM "vwProducts" T_Product
              WHERE ((T_Product."CatalogId" = HEXTORAW(:parentId)) AND (T_Product."LanguageId" = :languageId ));
    END;';
         EXECUTE IMMEDIATE varSqlTotal USING OUT parRecords, varFilterValues(1), varFilterValues(2);
    END;
    --Procedure NOT presenting anomaly\bug
    CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE "spProductCount2" (
         parCatalogId "Products"."CatalogId"%TYPE,
         parLanguageId NVARCHAR2 := N'it-IT',
         parRecords OUT NUMBER
    AS
         varFilterValues Varray_Params;
         varResult INTEGER;
         varSqlTotal VARCHAR2(32000);
    BEGIN
         parRecords := 0;
         varSqlTotal := 'BEGIN
         SELECT count(DISTINCT T_Product."ProductId") INTO :parCount FROM "vwProducts" T_Product
              WHERE ((T_Product."CatalogId" = HEXTORAW(:parentId)) AND (T_Product."LanguageId" = :languageId ));
    END;';
         EXECUTE IMMEDIATE varSqlTotal USING OUT parRecords, parCatalogId, parLanguageId;
    END;Edited by: 835125 on 2011-2-9 1:31

    835125 wrote:
    Using VARRAY was the only way I found to transform comma seprated text values (e.g. "'abc', 'def', '123'") in a collection of strings.A varray is just a functionally crippled version of a nested table collection type, with a defined limit you probably don't need. (Why 100 specifically?) Instead of
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE varray_params AS VARRAY(100) OF NVARCHAR2(1000);try
    CREATE OR REPLACE TYPE array_params AS TABLE OF NVARCHAR2(1000);I don't know whether that will solve the problem but at least it'll be a slightly more useful type.
    What makes you think it's a memory leak specifically? Do you observe session PGA memory use going up more than it should?
    btw good luck with all those quoted column names. I wouldn't like to have to work with those, although they do make the forum more colourful.
    Edited by: William Robertson on Feb 11, 2011 7:54 AM

  • How to fix huge iTunes memory leak in 64-bit Windows 7?

    iTunes likes to allocate as much as 1.6GB of memory on my dual-quad XEON 8GB 64-Bit Windows computer and then becomes unresponsive.
    This can happen several times a day and has been going on for as long as I can remember.  No other software that I use does this - only Apple's iTunes.  Each version I have installed of iTunes appears to have this same memory leak.  Currently I am running version 10.7.0.21.
    I love iTunes when it works.  But having to constantly kill and relaunch the app throughout the day is bringing me down.
    Searching for a fix for this on the internet just surfaces more and more complaints about this problem - but without a solution.
    Having written shrinkwrapped software for end users as well as for large corporations and governments for more than 25 years I know a thing or two about software.  A leak like this should take no more than a day or two to locate using modern software tools and double that to fix it.  So why with each new version of iTunes does this problem persist?  iTunes for Windows is the flagship software product Apple makes for non-Mac users - yet they continue to pass up each opportunity they have had over the years with each new release to fix this issue.  Why is this?
    Either the software engineers are not that good or they have been told NOT to spend time on this issue.  I personally believe that the engineers at Apple are very good, and therefore am left thinking that the latter is more likely the case.  Maybe this is to coax people to purchase a Mac so that they can finally run iTunes without these egregious memory leaks.  I would like to offer another issue to consider.
    Just as Amazon sold Kindles and Google sold Nexus tablets at low cost - not counting on margin for profit - but instead they wanted to saturate the marketplace with tools for making future purchases of content almost trivial to do with their devices.  Apple also counts on this model with their pricer hardware - but they also have iTunes.  Instead of trying to get people to switch to a MAC by continuing to avoid fixing this glaring issue in iTunes for Windows I would like to suggest that by allowing their engineers to address this issue that Apple will help keep Windows users from jumping ship to another music app.  The profit to be made by keeping those Windows users happy and wedded to the iTunes store is obvious.
    By continuing to keep this leak in iTunes for Windows all it does is lower my esteem for the company and start to make me wonder if the software is just as buggy on Macs.

    I have same issue. Ongoing for more than 1 year and currently running iTunes 11.3.
    My PC is Dell OptiPlex 990 I7 processor, 8GB ram, W7 64 [always keep things patched up to latest OS updates etc]
    I use this iTunes install to stream music videos etc to multiple appleTVs, ipads, iphones etc .. via Home Sharing
    Store all my media including music, videos and apps on separate NAS  .. so the iTunes running on PC is only doing the traffic cop role and streaming / using files stored on NAS .. creates lots of IO across my network
    Previous troubleshooting suggest possible contributing causes include
    a) podcast updates  .. until recently I had this auto updates on multiple podcast subscriptions, presumably the iTunes would flow this from the PC to save on the NAS across the network .. if the memory leak is in the iTunes network communication layer (?bonjour?)  this may be sensitive to IO that would not normally occur if the iTunes file saving was local on the same PC
    b) app updates .. have 200+ apps in my library and there is always a batch of updates .. some updates 100s of MB is size .. routinely see 500MB to 1GB of updates in single update run .. all my apps are
    c) streaming music / movies .. seems when we ramp up streamlining of music or movies . memory leak grows faster .. ie within hours of clean start
    c) large syncs of music or videos to ipads or iphones .. noticed that get big problems when I rebuild an ipad .. I typically have 60+ GB of data in terms of apps /  music / videos to load .. have to do rebuild in phases due to periodic lockups

  • Check memory leak using sun studio 10

    Hi,
    I'm using sun studio 10 to find the memory leak. I pre loaded the librtc.so and attached the process. Then I set the break point at the beginning of scenairo and the end of scenario. Then I trigger the event and program flow hits the break point at the beginning of scenairo, I try to enable the "Memory Check". Then I continue my application. But, I don't see anything show up in the "memory check" tab in the debug window.
    Is anyone there who know what is the problem here? Appreciate your help.
    Li

    Can you help mi. Novice
    mail [email protected]

  • Memory leak using xslprocessor.valueof in 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit ??

    My company has made the decision to do all of our internal inter-system communication using XML. Often we may need to transfer thousands of records from one system to another and due to this (and the 32K limit in prior versions) we're implementing it in 11g. Currently we have Oracle 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 on 64 bit Linux.
    This is a completely network/memory setup - the XML data comes in using UTL_HTTP and is stored in a CLOB in memory and then converted to a DOMDocument variable and finally the relevant data is extracted using xslprocessor.valueof calls.
    While this is working fine for smaller datasets, I've discovered that repeated calls with very large documents cause the xslprocessor to run out of memory with the following message:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 21256 bytes
    (qmxdContextEnc,)
    ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR", line 1010
    ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR", line 1036
    ORA-06512: at "XDB.DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR", line 1044
    ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.UTL_INTERFACE_PKG", line 206
    ORA-06512: at line 28
    Elapsed: 00:03:32.45
    SQL>
    From further testing, it appears that the failure occurs after approximately 161,500 calls to xslprocessor.valueof however I'm sure this is dependent on the amount of server memory available (6 GB in my case).
    I expect that we will try and log a TAR on this, but my DBA is on vacation right now. Has anyone else tried calling the xslprocessor 200,000 times in a single session?
    I've tried to make my test code as simple as possible in order to track down the problem. This first block simply iterates through all of our offices asking for all of the employees at that office (there are 140 offices in the table).
    DECLARE
    CURSOR c_offices IS
    SELECT office_id
    FROM offices
    ORDER BY office_id;
    r_offices C_OFFICES%ROWTYPE;
    BEGIN
    OPEN c_offices;
    LOOP
    FETCH c_offices INTO r_offices;
    EXIT WHEN c_offices%NOTFOUND;
    utl_interface_pkg.get_employees(r_offices.office_id);
    END LOOP;
    CLOSE c_offices;
    END;
    Normally I'd be returning a collection of result data from this procedure, however I'm trying to make things as simple as possible and make sure I'm not causing the memory leak myself.
    Below is what makes the SOAP calls (using the widely circulated UTL_SOAP_API) to get our data and then extracts the relevant parts. Each office (call) should return between 200 and 1200 employee records.
    PROCEDURE get_employees (p_office_id IN VARCHAR2)
    l_request utl_soap_api.t_request;
    l_response utl_soap_api.t_response;
    l_data_clob CLOB;
    l_xml_namespace VARCHAR2(100) := 'xmlns="' || G_XMLNS_PREFIX || 'EMP.wsGetEmployees"';
    l_xml_doc xmldom.DOMDocument;
    l_node_list xmldom.DOMNodeList;
    l_node xmldom.DOMNode;
    parser xmlparser.Parser;
    l_emp_id NUMBER;
    l_emp_first_name VARCHAR2(100);
    l_emp_last_name VARCHAR2(100);
    BEGIN
    --Set our authentication information.
    utl_soap_api.set_proxy_authentication(p_username => G_AUTH_USER, p_password => G_AUTH_PASS);
    l_request := utl_soap_api.new_request(p_method => 'wsGetEmployees',
    p_namespace => l_xml_namespace);
    utl_soap_api.add_parameter(p_request => l_request,
    p_name => 'officeId',
    p_type => 'xsd:string',
    p_value => p_office_id);
    l_response := utl_soap_api.invoke(p_request => l_request,
    p_url => G_SOAP_URL,
    p_action => 'wsGetEmployees');
    dbms_lob.createtemporary(l_data_clob, cache=>FALSE);
    l_data_clob := utl_soap_api.get_return_clob_value(p_response => l_response,
    p_name => '*',
    p_namespace => l_xml_namespace);
    l_data_clob := DBMS_XMLGEN.CONVERT(l_data_clob, 1); --Storing in CLOB converted symbols (<">) into escaped values (&lt;, &qt;, &gt;).  We need to CONVERT them back.
    parser := xmlparser.newParser;
    xmlparser.parseClob(parser, l_data_clob);
    dbms_lob.freetemporary(l_data_clob);
    l_xml_doc := xmlparser.getDocument(parser);
    xmlparser.freeparser(parser);
    l_node_list := xslprocessor.selectNodes(xmldom.makeNode(l_xml_doc),'/employees/employee');
    FOR i_emp IN 0 .. (xmldom.getLength(l_node_list) - 1)
    LOOP
    l_node := xmldom.item(l_node_list, i_emp);
    l_emp_id := dbms_xslprocessor.valueOf(l_node, 'EMPLOYEEID');
    l_emp_first_name := dbms_xslprocessor.valueOf(l_node, 'FIRSTNAME');
    l_emp_last_name := dbms_xslprocessor.valueOf(l_node, 'LASTNAME');
    END LOOP;
    xmldom.freeDocument(l_xml_doc);
    END get_employees;
    All of this works just fine for smaller result sets, or fewer iterations (only the first two or three offices). Even up to the point of failure the data is being extracted correctly - it just eventually runs out of memory. Is there any way to free up the xslprocessor? I've even tried issuing DBMS_SESSION.FREE_UNUSED_USER_MEMORY but it makes no difference.

    Replying to both of you -
    Line 206 is the first call to xslprocessor.valueof:
    LINE TEXT
    206 l_emp_id := dbms_xslprocessor.valueOf(l_node, 'EMPLOYEEID');
    This is one function inside of a larger package (the UTL_INTERFACE_PKG). The package is just a grouping of these functions - one for each type of SOAP interface we're using. None of the others exhibited this problem, but then none of them return anywhere near this much data either.
    Here is the contents of V$TEMPORARY_LOBS immediately after the crash:
    SID CACHE_LOBS NOCACHE_LOBS ABSTRACT_LOBS
    132 0 0 0
    148 19 1 0
    SID 132 is a SYS session and SID 148 is mine.
    I've discovered with further testing that if I comment out all of the xslprocessor.valueof calls except for the first one the code will complete successfully. It executes the valueof call 99,463 times. If I then uncomment one of those additional calls, we double the number of executions to a theoretical 198,926 (which is greater than the 161,500 point where it usually crashes) and it runs out of memory again.

  • Memory leak using CWGraph

    I have a memory leak problem using the CWGraph control.
    I have an SDI application (MFC using Measurement Studio) and I generate dynamicaly a dialog containing a 2D Graph, and I use the OnTimer() of the dialog to generate data and to update the graph, with a timer of 50ms. In OnTimer() function I have a loop to generate
    and to update two plots on the graph. When I call a method of the graph (for example for changing the color of the plot or for updating a plot (using PlotXvsY)), I have a periodic increasing of memory with a fixed amount of memory (4k). In the same OnTimer() function I update also some CWSlide controls without memory leaks.
    If I comment the line that call a method of graph
    (ex. m_Graph.Plots.Item(1)....), the code works wi
    thout memory leaks.
    I'll apreciate any suggestion about this problem.

    I had the same memory leak problem with my program as well. I do not think it is because of using CWGraph. Memory leaks occur when you allocate memory and did not free them. The problem will accumulate and crashed randomly (sometime it crashed when you just move mouse around). Try this: if the program does not crash (memory leak crash) on the first time it compiles and runs, it is probable has nothing to do with the CWGraph. On the second and third run, if you did not free variable, the program will usually crashed. If your program crashed on the first time it runs, the problem might be something else.

  • Memory leak using Oracle thin driver on wls6.1...

    Hi, I've been attempting to find a memory leak in an application that
    runs on WLS 6.1 SP2, on Solaris 8 and accessing an Oracle 9i db. We
    are using the Type 4 (Thin) driver and JProbe reports that hundreds of
    oracle.jdbc.* objects are left on the heap after my test case
    completes. Specifically oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTCItem is the most common
    loiterer on the heap. I have verified that after each database access
    the resources are release correctly (i.e. ResultSet, Connection,
    PreparedStatement, etc.)
    Has anyone encountered similar problems? or does anyone know how to
    fix this?
    Thanks,
    Tim Watson

    Hi Tim!
    We have seen problem using oracle 817 client that has been resolved using
    901 client for type2(oci) driver, But i am not aware of thin driver
    problem. You should check with oracle if they have find any customer's
    with this problem.
    Thanks,
    Mitesh
    Tim Watson wrote:
    Hi, I've been attempting to find a memory leak in an application that
    runs on WLS 6.1 SP2, on Solaris 8 and accessing an Oracle 9i db. We
    are using the Type 4 (Thin) driver and JProbe reports that hundreds of
    oracle.jdbc.* objects are left on the heap after my test case
    completes. Specifically oracle.jdbc.ttc7.TTCItem is the most common
    loiterer on the heap. I have verified that after each database access
    the resources are release correctly (i.e. ResultSet, Connection,
    PreparedStatement, etc.)
    Has anyone encountered similar problems? or does anyone know how to
    fix this?
    Thanks,
    Tim Watson

  • Memory Leak Lenovo X201 and Windows 8

    Hi,
    I'm having a memory leak issue with my X201 and Windows 8. My system starts almost without memory, taking 6.7 of 7.8 GB RAM.
    More people seem to have the same problem:
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_cp-windows_programs/windows-8-rtm-memory-le...
    I have installed the available beta drivers  but they don't help. Any advice?
    Spec:
    - Windows 8 Enterprise
     - Intel Core i7-620M Processor (2.66GHz, 4MB L3, 1066MHz FSB)
     - Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64
     - Genuine Windows 7 Professional 64 US English
     - 12.1" WXGA LED Panel, 2x2 UltraConnect II antenna; with Camera and Wireless Broadband Upgradeable
     - 8 GB PC3-8500 DDR3 SDRAM 1067MHz SODIMM Memory (2 DIMM)
     - Keyboard UK English
     - TrackPoint with Fingerprint Reader
     - 128 GB Solid State Drive, Serial ATA
     - 5-1 Media Card Reader and Modem
     - ThinkPad X200 Series 9 cell Li-Ion Battery (up to 5 hours life)
      - Country Pack United Kingdom with Line cord & 65W AC adapter
     - Bluetooth w/ antenna
     - Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6200 (2x2 AGN)
     - Integrated Wireless Wide Area Network upgradable

    Does Windows 8 manage memory differently?

  • Memory leak using GWT 1.4 and JDK 1.5

    We are running the following:
    OS : Solaris 5.10
    WebLogic version: 10.0
    JDK : Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_14-b03)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_14-b03, mixed mode)
    GWT : 1.4
    Oracle : 10g
    We have found memory leak with the above configuration.
    After running 1 session we are facing memory leak. The used Java heap is 4% higher than the one used after we conduct
    our memory tests for 1 user.
    Similarly, after running 5 concurrent sessions we are also facing memory leak where Java heap memory is utilised more
    by about 4%.
    I have used JRockit JDK 1.5 for figuring out memory leak. I have not found a memory leak in any of the modules
    developed by us.
    The memory leak issue is we think concerned with the version of JDK, Weblogic, Sun OS.
    Can somebody please suggest whether we can use the version as mentioned above?
    Any help on this front will be appreciated.

    gc log:
    #log information
    JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -verbose:gc "
    JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+PrintGCDetails "
    JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+PrintGCTimeStamps "
    JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -XX:+DisableExplicitGC "
    JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Xloggc:/path/to/gclog`date +%Y.%m.%d-%H:%M:%S`.log "Check sun papers for garbage collecting tips.
    >
    Is there any other way we can detect memory leak?
    >
    You have to profile your Application Server like you did with your own code.
    regards
    slowfly

  • Memory leak using thin client

    Subject: Memory Leak while using thin client.
    From: [email protected] (Alon Albert)
    Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.jndi
    I have a small test program that causes a memory leak while connecting
    to a weblogic server. The code is appended to the end of the msg. The
    problem is definatly caused by the InitialContext creation.
    Even if I explicitly call the InitialContext.close() method, the
    problem persists. I realize I can avoid the problem by using a one
    time connection outside the loop but keep in mind that this is only a
    test program. The full application REQUIRES me to do a full
    reconnection each time it is accessed.
    I have read in a previous simmilar post that the problem mught be RMI
    related. Is anything I can do about this?
    package jmxleak;
    import java.net.*;
    import java.util.*;
    import javax.management.*;
    import javax.naming.*;
    public class Main {
    String host;
    String username;
    String password;
    MBeanServer mbs;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    while (true) {
    Main main = new Main(args[0], args[1], args[2]);
    main.connect();
    main = null;
    System.out.println("Collecting garbage.");
    System.gc();
    public Main(String host, String username, String password) {
    this.host = host;
    this.username = username;
    this.password = password;
    private void connect() {
    try {
    System.out.print("Connecting..., ");
    Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(new
    URLClassLoader(new URL[] { new URL("http://" + host + "/classes/")}));
    Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
    env.put("java.naming.factory.initial",
    "weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
    env.put("java.naming.provider.url", "t3://" + host);
    if (username.length() > 0 && password.length() > 0) {
    env.put("java.naming.security.principal", username);
    env.put("java.naming.security.credentials", password);
    System.out.print("Creating context..., ");
    InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(env);
    catch (Exception e) {
    e.printStackTrace();

    Subject: Memory Leak while using thin client.
    From: [email protected] (Alon Albert)
    Newsgroups: weblogic.developer.interest.jndi
    I have a small test program that causes a memory leak while connecting
    to a weblogic server. The code is appended to the end of the msg. The
    problem is definatly caused by the InitialContext creation.
    Even if I explicitly call the InitialContext.close() method, the
    problem persists. I realize I can avoid the problem by using a one
    time connection outside the loop but keep in mind that this is only a
    test program. The full application REQUIRES me to do a full
    reconnection each time it is accessed.
    I have read in a previous simmilar post that the problem mught be RMI
    related. Is anything I can do about this?
    package jmxleak;
    import java.net.*;
    import java.util.*;
    import javax.management.*;
    import javax.naming.*;
    public class Main {
    String host;
    String username;
    String password;
    MBeanServer mbs;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    while (true) {
    Main main = new Main(args[0], args[1], args[2]);
    main.connect();
    main = null;
    System.out.println("Collecting garbage.");
    System.gc();
    public Main(String host, String username, String password) {
    this.host = host;
    this.username = username;
    this.password = password;
    private void connect() {
    try {
    System.out.print("Connecting..., ");
    Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(new
    URLClassLoader(new URL[] { new URL("http://" + host + "/classes/")}));
    Hashtable env = new Hashtable();
    env.put("java.naming.factory.initial",
    "weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory");
    env.put("java.naming.provider.url", "t3://" + host);
    if (username.length() > 0 && password.length() > 0) {
    env.put("java.naming.security.principal", username);
    env.put("java.naming.security.credentials", password);
    System.out.print("Creating context..., ");
    InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext(env);
    catch (Exception e) {
    e.printStackTrace();

  • Memory leak using 10.2.0.3 OCI client on Solaris

    Hi,
    We are using OCI client libraries to connect our C++ program to the Oracle Database. The program does a lot of selects, inserts and SP calls.
    Oracle client and Oracle server both are 10.2.0.3.
    We have been observing a memory leak of 4M bytes in the C++ program every few minutes since last few days. On debugging through Purify, libumem, and Sun Studio 12, we finally managed to narrow down the problem to the Oracle client library OCI calls.
    The Sun Studio leak check shows the following -
    Leak #37, Instances = 157, Bytes Leaked = 655004
    kpummapg + 0x00000098
    kghgex + 0x00000648
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kghgex + 0x000003BC
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kghgex + 0x000003BC
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kpuhhalo + 0x00000558
    kpugdesc + 0x00000AD4
    kpugparm + 0x00000374
    COCIResultSet::InterpretData() + 0x000001B4
    COCIResultSet::COCIResultSet(COCIStatement*,OCIStmt*,OCIError*) + 0x000000A4
    COCIStatement::PrepareResult() + 0x00000190
    A select is executed, a resultset is fetched and the resultset is immeidately closed. The same piece of code has been running at various production systems without any problems. Most of the other sites are either 10.2.0.4 or 9i.
    On searching Metalink and various other forums, I found similar issues faced in 10.2.0.1.
    Could someone advise if there are any bugs corresponding to this which have been closed. Would upgrading to 10.2.0.4 solve the problem?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Apparently a similar issue is being discussed over here:
    Re: Memory Leak
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    Naveed.

  • Memory leak using 10.2.0.3 OCCI client on Solaris 10

    Hi,
    We are using OCCI client libraries to connect our C++ program to the Oracle Database. The program does a lot of selects, inserts and SP calls.
    Oracle client and Oracle server both are 10.2.0.3 on Solaris 10.
    We have been observing a memory leak of 4M bytes in the C++ program every few minutes since last few days. On debugging through Purify, libumem, and Sun Studio 12, we finally managed to narrow down the problem to the Oracle client library OCI calls.
    The Sun Studio leak check shows the following -
    Leak #37, Instances = 157, Bytes Leaked = 655004
    kpummapg + 0x00000098
    kghgex + 0x00000648
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kghgex + 0x000003BC
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kghgex + 0x000003BC
    kghfnd + 0x000005BC
    kghalo + 0x00000A6C
    kpuhhalo + 0x00000558
    kpugdesc + 0x00000AD4
    kpugparm + 0x00000374
    COCIResultSet::InterpretData() + 0x000001B4
    COCIResultSet::COCIResultSet(COCIStatement*,OCIStmt*,OCIError*) + 0x000000A4
    COCIStatement::PrepareResult() + 0x00000190
    A select is executed, a resultset is fetched and the resultset is immeidately closed. The same piece of code has been running at various production systems without any problems. Most of the other sites are either 10.2.0.4 or 9i.
    On searching Metalink and various other forums, I found similar issues faced in 10.2.0.1.
    Could someone advise if there are any bugs corresponding to this which have been closed. Would upgrading to 10.2.0.4 solve the problem?
    Thanks.

    Please ... one post and one post only in the group most appropriate to your inquiry. Please open an SR at metalink.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Dvd behaves one way on computer, one way on dvd player

    i've burned a recent project in dvdsp4. the menu page has only one button 'play'. when you hit play on the simulator the main feature plays back perfectly. if i take a burned dvd and stick it in a domestic dvd player it behaves the same way. if i put

  • Outlook 2013 users getting "The Microsoft Exchange administrator has made a change that.....

    Hi, We are on Exchange 2013 SP1 and we are randomly seeing all Outlook 2013 clients getting "the Microsoft Exchange administrator has made a change..." forcing them to restart Outlook. Outlook 2010 clients are not affected so seems to be related to O

  • Implementation of BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM. and BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI

    Hi All, Facing a problem in BADI can u please help me out... I am implementing sourcing dashboard. I am facing problem while implementing the badi BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI in SRM. and BBP_PO_INBOUND_BADI in R3. i have written following code in BBP_ECS_PO_

  • Start Workflow from transaction

    Hi , Please let me know, where can i subscribe my custom workflow to trigger the workflow if we want to start the workflow manually from transaction FV60. Thanks in advance Sarath

  • TS3276 duplicate emails in inbox

    I have 10+ copies of same email (dplicates) in all my email accounts, via appale mail app.   email service provider only show one of each on their system.  so apple mail must be doign something to duplicate.  any ideas?  thank you.