Memory usage of big Array in sub-VI (was: Allow the creation of "Inplace"-VIs of Idea Exchange)

Hi,
this thread is based on my post in the LabVIEW idea exchange.
I put my VIs in the attached .rar file.
Regards
Marc
CLD
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Inplace_VI.ZIP ‏21 KB

That would be a good explanation.  There was a thread on something very similar to this recently.  Can't remember exactly the topic but Daniel's answer certainly triggered some memories of a very similar discussion taking place.
I think it had to do with LV assigning a Array created as a constant as Read-only so in order to make changes to it it needs to be copied to a new memory location, thus leaving the constant unchanged.
I wonder how it performs in other LV versions.
Shane.
PS: Found the thread.  HERE.
Message Edited by Intaris on 08-20-2009 03:23 AM
Say hello to my little friend.
RFC 2323 FHE-Compliant

Similar Messages

  • Excessively high memory usage by Tomcat in NT

    We are facing the problem of excessive memory usage by our servlets (that call JNI functions). The memory usage seems to touch 50+ MB in 2000 Server but it drops down to 30 MB soon. But, this does not happen in NT. The memory keeps on increasing and there is a point in time when Tomcat occupies all the available memory.
    We are taking care of garbage collecting the objects frequently(by calling Runtime.gc()). Is there any other way by which we can have some kind of control over the usage of memory?
    Do we have to install a patch for NT (if something like this is available)?
    NT Server:
    PIII 500 MHz, 256MB RAM, 40GB HDD
    2000 Server:
    PIII 700 MHz, 128MB RAM, 20GB HDD
    Tomcat:
    Version 3.2.1
    JDK:
    Sun's JDK 1.3
    Any suggestions, pointers are appreciated.
    Thanks
    Manish
    [email protected]

    Hi, Manish:
    I've solved memory leak problem in JNI once. Memory leak may be resulted from inapproriate memory access in C or C++ library.
    My previous problem is: I get a C byte array from Java byte array by GetByteArrayElements, however, I never call ReleaseByteArrayElements before C function return. That will let that Java byte array unable to be garbage collected. After inserting ReleaseByteArrayElements before return, it won't run out of memory again. Similar problems may happen when useless Java object's reference count not zero because NewGlobalReference without calling DeleteGlobalReference.
    However, I've faced another problem in JNI (see http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=52&thread=212275). I wonder if JVM release or reset memory allocated in C library. Hope it is not true.
    Regards,
    David Wu

  • Server 2008 R2 Memory Usage

    We have 10 Server 2008 R2 servers all exhibiting the same behaviour.
    The servers run at almost 100% memory utilization.  Only one has had SP1 installed, which I did this morning and after about 1 hour, the memory is maxed out.  The server initially had 14GB memory, but after installing SP1 and seeing more of the
    same, I decided to try installing more RAM.  I put in another 8GB, and while it takes a little longer to bottom out, it still bottoms out.  Perfmon is showing less than 100MB of available memory, and, as expected, performance is not good.
    These servers are strictly file servers.  We work with images of hard drives.  They are split into 2GB chunks.  An easy way to replicate the issue is to load a hard drive image and do a re-acquisition.  We do this sometimes as a drive
    may be acquired in the field without compression, and we will re-acquire it with compression.  Once this process is started, in about 1 hour, I have about 100MB free memory. 
    Using RamMap,  Mapped File is using 21GB of memory.  When I look at the file summary, the server is caching the 2GB image files and not letting go of them in a timely manner.  I am the _only_ person accessing this server, it just gets worse
    when more are.
    As noted above, performance is terrible, is this supposed to be normal?
    Server is an IBM x3550 M2 with dual quad-core CPU, 22GB RAM, OS is on a RAID 1 mirror of two 76GB 15K SAS drives, and the server has two 14TB arrays attached. OS is Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1.  Only the File Server Role is installed.
    Thanks,
    Brian

    Hi,
    I would like to confirm that do you have Exchange Server installed on the servers?
    If you do have Exchange Server installed, this behavior is normal. Exchange store.exe grabs as much RAM on the server as it can possibly get because
    store.exe needs it to optimize performance. For more information, please refer to the following Microsoft TechNet blogs:
    Why is Exchange Store.exe so RAM hungry?
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2004/08/02/206012.aspx
    Understanding Exchange 2007 Memory Usage and its use of the Paging File
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2008/08/06/3406010.aspx
    If you do not have Exchange Server installed, please check Task Manager and let us know what application uses the large size of memory. In addition,
    you may run Process Explorer to monitor the memory usage. You may download and install it from the following link:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896653.aspx
    After that, please let us know the suspect.
    Regards,
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

  • MS Minimize and memory usage

    Hi,
    I noticed that if you minimize your dos window, your memory usage ( as shown in Windows task manager ) drops a lot. E.g. I have Tomcat running ( 15 MB usage ). When I minimize the Tomcat DOS window, the memory usage shows something like 160kB. Any ideas. What is the real usage ?
    Regards,
    Dieter Janssen

    When you minimize the window Java will run a garbage collection. But also be aware of that the memory usage in Windows task manager is shown in both the Mem Usage column and the VM Size column (you maybe need to add this to your Task manager).
    I hope this will help you!
    /Michael

  • SA520W - High memory usage, possible fix in 2.2.0 firmware?

    As suggested by Thomas Watts, I'm starting a new thread to discuss the new SA520W firmware (2.2.0) and a possible resolution to high memory usage I'm experiencing on my network.
    My current setup is: 16Mbit DSL > SA520W > SA300-10, all with stock settings (no fancy VLAN's etc.)
    I have 4 CentOS 5/6 servers and a Windows 7 Ultimate station connected to the switch. I use CIFS to connect from Windows station to the other Linux servers and send large files. I currently notice the following behavior:
    When the file transfer starts, the Intel 1Gbit NIC is nearly saturated, hitting 115MB/sec. After few seconds, the data transfer comes to a halt and the transfer speed drops to around 50MB/sec. If I check the memory usage before the file transfer, it is approximately to 50-60% (on a fresh router reboot). Every time I send large files to other machines, the router memory consumption increases and it does not lower after a reasonable delay. I end-up with high memory near 90% and the only solution I have is to reboot the router in order to bring it back to 50%.
    Now, Thomas told me that this is simply a cosmetic issue, the memory is not actually 90% used. Yet, when the memory hits this threshold, I'm not capable to send files are normal LAN speeds I'm used to. Rebooting the router allows me to send only ONCE (and for few seconds) data at the expected LAN speeds.
    I would apreciate any input from Cisco engineers as well other users who experience the same issue. I would also like to know if any related work was done into 2.2.0 firmware and when we expect to have it released to users.
    Regards,
    Floren Munteanu

    Hi Tom,
    See below the answers.
    Are you currently running the 2.1.71 code?
    Yes
    Are you using IPS?
    No, the LAN is for internal use (no external users allowed)
    Are you using Protectlink services?
    No
    Hardware wise, I did not changed anything on machines. All boxes have dual Intel EXPI9301CT NIC's (LACP was planned) but I currently use single connections for sanity reasons (disks won't allow greater speeds anyway). Previous to Cisco, I used a Netgear ProSafe router + switch which did not encountered the issues I mention. Honestly, at first I thought I'm dealing with some stupid disk issues on Windows. So I ran a quick test and the stats are proper:
    > winsat disk -drive c
    > Disk  Sequential 64.0 Read                   109.62 MB/s        6.5
    > Disk  Random 16.0 Read                       2.47 MB/s          4.4
    > Responsiveness: Average IO Rate              2.12 ms/IO         6.9
    > Responsiveness: Grouped IOs                  8.34 units         7.4
    > Responsiveness: Long IOs                     5.59 units         7.7
    > Responsiveness: Overall                      46.63 units        7.1
    > Responsiveness: PenaltyFactor                0.0
    > Disk  Sequential 64.0 Write                  117.03 MB/s        6.7
    > Average Read Time with Sequential Writes     6.977 ms           5.3
    > Latency: 95th Percentile                     32.720 ms          3.0
    > Latency: Maximum                             118.231 ms         7.6
    > Average Read Time with Random Writes         13.346 ms          3.7
    > Total Run Time 00:01:39.50
    As I mentioned before, everything is pretty much stock on router/switch settings. If you have any tips that allow me to identify the cause, I would appreciate the input. What puzzles me is the speed drop and quick memory usage increase. It occurs 7-10 seconds after the transfers begins. It looks like the data transfer hangs for a very short period of time (less than half of second) and the transfer speed decreases from 110-115MB/sec to 50-60MB/sec. The transfer is completed at this speed. No matter how many other files I try to transfer after, the speed won't go higher than 60MB/sec. If I reboot the router, I get the same cycle.

  • Ultra high memory usage when deleting a slide show

    Hallo,
    I have a DVD project with several menus and slideshows and a huge flowchart. I wanted to delete one of the slide shows. What happened then was that the memory usage rised up to over 2 GB. Not the usage of the exe shown in the windows task manager under "processes", but the swap file usage.
    The first time I waited for like 5 minutes, and then Encore closed itself. Without any error message.
    The next time I waited as long again, but then the swap file usage went down slowly again. After that Encore refreshed its window. The flow chart was what you could best describe as "broken". Encore then stated some abnormal condition and offered me to save the file, and recommended to save it under a different file name. I clicked on "ok", but instead of a file save dialog a C++ runtime error box appeared. I click "ok" for that, then the "you should save but under a different name" box appeared again. I clicked on "ok" again, the C++ error reappeared, and after clicking on "ok" there Encore closed itself.
    I made a screenshot on which you can see the high swap file memory usage and the broken flowchart. You can download the screenshot under
    http://www.digitale-bibliothek.de/Downloads/ScreenEncoreDVD.jpg
    I will now try to first delete all references to the slideshow in the flow chart. But as I cannot delete an asset that is still used in a slideshow or a timeline, Encore DVD should also prevent me from deleting objects that are used in the flowchart, if it is such a problem for Encore to delete the object then.
    Regards,
    Christian Kirchhoff

    I'm a little confused as to where you tried to delete the slideshow from.
    Was it from the actual Project Browser, where all the assets are listed?
    Can you try deleting the surplus slideshow from there, and let us know what happens please?

  • If my peak "physical memory" usage is around 50%, is adding more RAM a waste of money?

    I have a W700-DS with the T9600 dual-core and an SSD, and when running 4GB of RAM I'd notice that memory usage tended to rarely exceed 50%. Just for the heck of it, I just upgraded to 8GB of RAM, and now I'm curious as to whether I wasted my money, as the 4GB usage never hit 100%. One thing I did notice is that my "Windows Experience Index" went from 5.9 to 6.4, but I'm guessing maybe that's just marketing BS from Microsoft.
    Thanks for your opinions.

    If you haven't checked it out already, take a look at what the Resource Monitor tells you. I'm "using" only abpit 3GB out of 12 right now, but 9GB is marked "standby" -- memory filled by SuperFetch with items I'm most likely to need. The memory is still availalbe for something else if Windows/SuperFetch guessed wrong, but if it guessed right, it's already there and ready to go. Thus the boost to your Experience Index isn't total BS. You may actually be find your system more responsive. For example, if you always start your morning reading email, then check a website, then finally open your primary work applications, having more RAM allows SuperFetch to predictively load more of this while you're doing something else.
    Interstingly, as I was typing this, my In Use dropped to 2.7G, Standby has filled the remainign 9.3G and free is down to 0 (Hardware Reserved is a negligible 113MB).
    You don't mention exactly what OS you're using, but I'm going to presume Windows 7 x64... with a 32-bit OS, you definitely would have been wasting your money with its nominal 3GB limit. SuperFetch wasn't quite as good with Vista, but there would still be some benefit there, I think. I have no experience with XP x64.

  • Normal memory usage?

    Hi...
    Could anyone tell me what should be the normal memory usage of the server
    just after startup?
    I only have a few ejbs deployed and just after startup, my server memory
    jumps to 150Mb.. so I'm wondering if this is normal because it looks to me
    like a lot of memory...
    I used to work with another application server with the same ejbs deployed
    and even after several days up, the server process never took more han
    75-80Mb of memory.. Weblogic is taking like twice this amount just after
    startup... maybe my tuning is wrong.. is there anythng that I could do to
    lower the memory usage?
    by the way. I'm running WLS 7.0 on a win2k machine
    thanks!
    Mathieu Girard
    [email protected]

    Hi Mathieu,
    Generally there is no hard rule defined for all app servers for
    how much memory it should use after startup. Why whould you
    need to lower the memory usage? Do you have any specific
    problem with the digits you've got?
    Regards,
    Slava Imeshev
    "Mathieu Girard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]..
    Hi...
    Could anyone tell me what should be the normal memory usage of the server
    just after startup?
    I only have a few ejbs deployed and just after startup, my server memory
    jumps to 150Mb.. so I'm wondering if this is normal because it looks to me
    like a lot of memory...
    I used to work with another application server with the same ejbs deployed
    and even after several days up, the server process never took more han
    75-80Mb of memory.. Weblogic is taking like twice this amount just after
    startup... maybe my tuning is wrong.. is there anythng that I could do to
    lower the memory usage?
    by the way. I'm running WLS 7.0 on a win2k machine
    thanks!
    Mathieu Girard
    [email protected]

  • Memory usage exceed -Xmx option in Windows 2000.

    Hi ,
    I run the java application with -Xms300M -Xmx600M option in Windows 2000.
    When I start the application, it's virtual memory size is 300M.
    (In Windows TaskManager choose the Processes Tab and select "Select Columns..." option in View menu. And check the "Virtual Memory Size".)
    After several test I found that it's virtual memory size is bigger than 600M in Windows TaskManager.
    It's virtual memory size is about 650M.
    Why the application's memory usage is bigger than 600M despite of -Xmx600M?

    The -Xms and -Xmx control the Java heap size only.
    The stack does not go on the heap, and the VM will need some memory of its own as well.

  • Logic Pro 8, Kontakt 2.23 & Memory usage

    Hello -
    *What type of known memory problems might exist between Logic (Logic 8 in particular) and either Kontakt 2.23 or Kontakt Player 2.23??*
    *If there are known memory usage issues, what can be done to help/fix the situation??*
    My computer set up is listed below. I have not upgraded to Leopard (but did upgrade to Logic Pro 8). By-in-large, Logic Pro 8 works fine. However, I usually "network" the Logic sequencing projects with Muse Research's Receptor (version B) and/or an aging Dell Precision Workstation 650 using Musiclab's MIDIoverLan CP3. This has proven stable for me. For my most recent project, I decided to see how many instrument plug-ins I can utilize within the Logic Pro 8 program (without benefit of this "network" set-up). For this project, I'm using one instance of MusicLab's RealGuitar and 16 instances of +*Kontakt Player version 2.23*+ for a total of 17 instrumental tracks. The instrument libraries used are Garritan's GPO and JABB. With this many individual (not multi) track instances used, the activity monitor is showing high RAM usage. For some of the instruments, I could not use the KS choices (trumpet, trombone) because the extra RAM caused Logic to crash as I mounted more instruments.
    I tried adjusting the DFD. Still, there remained high RAM usage and the occasional crash. For some of the crashes, I either got the endless colored spinning wheel or a message basically stating that there was no memory available for the DFD. I am no expert with the advanced workings of Logic and the DFD associated with the Kontakt plug-ins. But I am surprised that using just 17 instrument tracks with this newer Mac Pro computer (with 5 GBs RAM) is causing problems. Sadly, I am not an expert Apple user to be able to tell whether it's the computer or Logic or Kontakt. I suspect, though, its some kind of issue between Kontakt and Logic.
    For my audio, I use MOTU's 2408 MK3. For my midi in-put I use M-Audio's Keystation Pro 88. I do not think either one of these devices are causing the apparent memory problems.
    By the way. . . before I purchased my newer MacPro computer, I had a similar instrumental set-up using my aging Dell Precision 650 workstation with 2 GB of RAM using Steinberg's SX 3 program. I used the same GPO and JABB sound libraries. It did "challange" the Dell computer (I had to adjust buffer/latency settings to MOTU's 828 MK2 used with the Dell computer), but the computer didn't crash like what I'm experiencing at present.
    I don't mind "networking" my computers together in order to use larger instrumental plug-in tracks. But I would think that given the "power" of my newer MacPro I should be able to handle more than 17 GPO & JABB tracks. Yes? No?
    *Given my current computer set-up, how many instrumental tracks (using libraries associated with Kontakt or the Kontakt Player) should I get??*
    Thank you in advance.
    Ted

    Sadly, I can chime in with the same basic problem. Namely, that
    Kontakt2 seems to leak ram. I've watched the activity monitor show
    an increase in ram allocation to logic if i simply LOOK at a kontakt
    instance. Just clicking on the instance causes ram to be allocated, and no matter how much I purge samples, I just can't retrieve that ram. Once 2 gigs are sent to logic, crash.
    The only solution I've found is to save & restart before it climbs too high. I can then work for an hour or so until the ram overflows again. This is obviously a major bug, and I agree that Logic doesn't appear to be the culprit.
    Have either of you tried K3? I wonder if the problem is more under control there? There's no way Kontakt will bother to fix this bug
    in v2.23 with v3 on the shelves. The question is, how do we know that v3 fixes it without buying it? I've heard reports that v3 is even
    more bloated than v2.
    I've recently done a clean install of leopard on a blank drive, and
    i'm patiently waiting until NI updates the installers for K2.
    Then, i'll have a clean OS, clean newly installed logic 8, and
    a cleanly installed K2. Maybe that will help mitigate, if not solve the problem.
    I'm almost sure that Kontakt is the source of the problem, but
    I've also been told that Intels have serious flaws in their ram
    allocation WITH TIGER.
    Some people with G5's have reported having access to 3.5 gigs ram.
    Intells can only use 2 gigs with any one app. This was thought to be a problem with Tiger and and Intels. So maybe Leopard will expand the RAM wallet, and then we just have to wait for Kontakt to stop spending so much.

  • [HELP ]unexpected low memory usage

    Hi all,
    Could someone help me out with unexpected low memory usage I am facing when I start the DB instance.
    I am running Oracle 8.1.7.3.2 on Windows 2000 Adv Srv with
    2GB of RAM and 3GB of swap area.
    I only have 1 instance with memory related init parameters setted as below.
    shared_pool_size = 293510451
    large_pool_size = 104857600
    java_pool_size = 20971520
    db_block_buffers = 107289
    sort_area_size = 1048576
    avg of about 150~250session so I was expecting the oracle
    to allocate about 1.5GB of RAM when the instance startsup
    Now, when I startup the instance, EXPECTING the oracle to
    allocate about 1.5GB of RAM for himself, and check the
    memory allocation status from the "task manager", it
    shows that 1.4GB of physical memory is AVAILABLE. In another words, the whole system is only using 600MB of
    physical memory.
    Could anyone tell why this is happening and the solution to solve this problem?
    BTW, even if I give loads to oracle using the Mercury LoadRunner, the memory allocation status does not change much while oracle is barely processing each transactions.
    Thanks, in advance

    I work mostly with UNIX but found the following from Metalink document# 46001.1 Oracle Database and the Windows NT memory architecture, Technical Bulletin. I think this answers your question:
    On starting up an Oracle instance all global memory pages are reserved and committed (Total Shared Global Area, Buffer Cache and Redo Buffers). Only a small number of these memory pages are touched on startup and are thus not in Oracle's working set, as more pages are touched they will be brought into memory. Oracle must contend equally with other processes and will have its working set trimmed if other processes are faulting at a greater rate.
    It is unlikely that this trimming will be desirable, especially when the database has a varying workload (high and low usage periods). Two registry parameters exist to allow the administrator to manipulate the working set bounds of the Oracle process, these are :
    - ORA_WORKINGSETMIN or ORA_%SID%_WORKINGSETMIN
    : Minimum working set for the ORACLE.EXE process (units = MB)
    - ORA_WORKINGSETMAX or ORA_%SID%_WORKINGSETMAX
    : Maximum working set for the ORACLE.EXE process (units = MB)
    These parameters apply to all releases from 7.3.x and should be added to the Long postings are being truncated to ~1 kB at this time.

  • ITunes 702 memory usage.

    I find this a bit odd.
    If you turn on the option to minimize to the tray and minimize it, the memory usage stays around 50mb, as if it was up on the screen. If you turn the option off, and minimize, then it drops to about 12mb of ram. Shouldn't they be the same?
    I have to say I am really disappointed with this version of iTunes. It's terribly slow. It's sad that just the UI needs about 40mb of ram.
    Does anyone have any tips on how to speed it up, or is it like this for everyone?

    iTunes 7.0.2 is a total POS. Many of us have been waiting for a fix(s) to the myriad issues - CPU usage, RAM usage, song stuttering, video playback issues - for almost 2 months now.

  • High browser memory usage when streaming video

    I'm using Flex 4 and the Spark VideoPlayer.  I'm creating an application where you switch between several videos.  I noticed that the browser memory usage increases significantly when changing videos and never releases the memory.  I ran tests where the video is being served over a content delivery network that has Flash Media Server, so the content shouldn't be caching in the browser.  I profiled my Flex application and the memory usage increases slightly when changing videos.  I think that is attributed to this bug: https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25785.  However, my browser memory usage increases about 20MB when changing videos.  The video file I used to test is an mp4 file that is about 3MB in size.  I tried testing using a small video (about 300Kb) and noticed an increase of about 5MB in browser memory usage every time I replayed it.  So it looks like it's based on the video file size.  I was testing on Firefox and noticed the same results in Chrome.  Any idea why the browser memory usage would increase so much every time the video is loaded?
    Thanks in advance.

    That's normal for your machine. Video is fairly demanding in the integrated Intel GPU in that machine. Your CPU has to do much of the video processing. As a result, your fans will speed up to cool off the CPU which is working fairly hard. It's completely normal and all of the MacBooks with the same GPU experience the same thing.

  • Unexplained Memory Usage

    I have an iPod nano 4th gen. that I bought from Apple in April 2009. Everything works fine, but there is some unexplained memory usage. When I go to Settings > About, (on the iPod) where it shows how much memory is used and for what, it says 1.2GB of "Other". The only games on it are the 3 that come on it new, and I told it not to sync Contacts or Calendars. The only other thing I can think of under "Other" is a 4KB text note. Does anyone know what it could be that is using the 1.2GB? Thanks!

    Hello D.
    It sounds like your iPod has a couple of correct files, possibly due to failed syncs with some items in your iTunes library. Usually the Other category is in the MBs in size and is unusual for it to be in the GBs unless you use it for mass external storage, which you don't in this case.
    The only to correct this issue is to restore the iPod via iTunes. Keep in mind that this process will wipe all data from the iPod and set it back to its original default settings.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1339
    B-rock

  • Big memory usage in NetStream

    After some checking about our player memory usage - we descovered that when appendingBytes() into a netStream - it takes about 10-15 times the size (in Bytes) of the original video file from which we have read. Is there any way to lower this big memory consumption?
    Moreover - is there any way to "dispose" the buffer that was already played by appendBytes()?
    I tried to set inBufferSeek to false and maxBufferTime to 1. it doesn't seem to have any effect.

    Define "huge memory". Oracle generally requires a couple of hundred Mb of RAM.
    You can certainly change these services to start manually so long as you don't want your database to be running automatically.
    Justin
    Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
    http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installation Problems with OS X Tiger

    I'm currently running osX ver 10.1.5 i think. ( the nunber of versions are driving me nuts). Right now, i'm trying to install OS X Tiger ver 10.4. I've put in the disc, watch the window appear, clicked on the install icon, the reboot icon appeared, a

  • Xalan and Xerces

    Where do I get the compatible versions of above jars to do XSL Transformations. Pls help... Tried to do lot of research and not able to do much. Lates Xalan does not have XSLTProcessor, XSLTProcessorFactory and XSLTInputSource. I tried to use older v

  • Hp Pavilion 23xi Underscann​ing Resolution

    I recently purchased the Pavilion 23xi and I loved to picture clarity and quality, but some games such as Crysis Warhead had some image lag issues. I thought there had to be a way to fix this. I went to the HP website and searched for the 23xi and fo

  • Quicktime Add-In for .avi files

    I want to play back (& export into iMovie) a couple of .avi files I've downloaded. Clicking the file, launches Quicktime (by default) which displays a message that says a Quicktime component is missing. Clicking continue takes me to the Quicktime sit

  • I am getting a grid like pattern over solid colors durring a disolve

    I recently upgraded to Studio. When a sequence dissolves, especially to white, I am seeing a grid like pattern. I have also noticed this pattern in shots where there is a solid color in one location for a period of time. Any ideas? G5   Mac OS X (10.