Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups  (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a  settlement cost element.
Procedure :
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a)  You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
    "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.  If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted  in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement  rule.
-   You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in  Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation  through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88.  During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

Hi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500  is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • KO88 - message KD503 'Complete allocation structure ZD'

    Hello,
    Need some help regarding settlement error KD503 a user is getting via KO88.  User made posting to an incorrect primary cost element (611010).  That cost element is NOT included in the allocation structure and it should not be included.  The user reversed out the incorrect posting and tried to settle the IO.  The KO88 transaction still yields KD503 error.  Any ideas what the problem is?
    Both transactions were made in currency 'SGD'.  When running S_ALR_87012993 to check line item total for 611010 in IO, balance is 0 in 'SGD' but $.06 in CO area currency.  Would this be causing the issue?
    I'd appreciate your immediate help!  I've attached files in case it helps.

    Hi Mathew
    Nice to be talking to you again
    The balance of .06 is not the issue.. You posted a line item in the IO... And then reversed it
    So, from system's point of view, it has 2 line items in the IO to be settled..
    You will have to include this cost element temporarily in your allocation structure, as a formality.. Once the settlement is done, you can remove it again
    Include this Cost ele under any assignment in your allocation structure.. Impact would be null because the 2 line items nullify each other
    Br. Ajay M

  • Complete Allocation Structure A1 in K088

    Every month end, we settle IO unused supplies to inventory accounts (using KO88) but last July 2011 until today, system prompts this error: "Complete Allocation Structure A1"? Can anyone please help me resolve the error? Upon checking the settlement allocation structure, the master data and parameters seems all accurate. Please help resolve this issue. Thank you all in advance.

    hi Gracey
    your error msg. must be showing some cost element missing in the allocation structure.
    Kindly maintain the same in A1...
    Check the link below
    Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order
    Regards,
    Divraj

  • WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503

    hi all
    I created an WBS  600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
    Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
    Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
    Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
    kind regards
    Aman

    HI,
    Check  your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element  you posted listed in it
    OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
    Here the GL account should be listed
    Regards,
    Radha

  • Complete allocation structure Z4 Message no. KD503

    Complete allocation structure Z4
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 90001000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z4, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    If the posting under cost element 90001000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
    a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
    If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
    You can update allocation structure Z4
    Please help resolve error below.
    What do I need to reverse?
    Is there a different way to enter actual cost for this?
    What do you think is missing in my allocation structure?

    Hi paul
    This error message you are getting KD503
    This message comes up at the time of settlement of the order when you are transferring the cost from on cost object to the other. Here you are giving the final cost settlement on the asset so the final asset is where all the cost is going to get settle for the cost which you have taken in the internal order. you have to define a roadmap for the cost elements which is carrying the cost from the IO to the final asset.
    The resolution Is do the following: go to KO88 and explore the juke box where you have booked all the jv take note of all those cost elements now come to KSES and here under Z4 allocation structure give CO  area and go to source tab and give the range of cost elements that you have used in ko88 and save it
    This will resolve your issue.
    Kind regards
    Arman
    SAP FICO

  • While Doing Production Order Settlement "Complete Allocation structure" :

    Dear Experts
    I am Getting This Problem ,
    please give me A suitable Solution.
    I am created Another Allocation Structure And Assigned to Settllement Profile . But it is not trigering. Not Capturing That allocation
    Complete allocation structure Z1
    Message no. KD503
    Diagnosis
    During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
    Cost element 40512006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
    Procedure
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    u2022     If the posting under cost element 40512006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    Edited by: rajamallu on Jul 2, 2010 10:41 AM

    Hi,
    within allocation structure customizing you create assignments for allocation structure Z1.
    Each assignment has a source (cost element, cost element range, cost element group).
    The cost element 40512006 is not included in the source definition of allocation structure Z1 but there are values to be settled available on your sender.
    Thus they cannot be settled and thats why the message occurs. So maintain alloc. structure Z1 completely.
    Best regards, Christian

  • Complete Allocation Structure A1

    Hi everyone,
    I have a problem concerning settlement of orders. Running transaction va88 gives me an error message stating that I should complete allocation structure a1. However, this is not the allocation structure I want to use. The message says that I can assign a different allocaton structure to the sender by chosing Settlement Rule --> Goto --> Settlement Parameters in the master data of the sender.
    Now my question is where to find the master data of the sender!? Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Martin

    Hi,
    I have solved this issue now. Changed the allocation structure. Now I still have one problem concerning an account which is not maintained in the strucutre. However, to assign this cost element to the right part of the structure is something my controlling people have to figure out.
    Thanks anyway for all you help.
    Regards,
    martin

  • We are getting the following error "Complete allocation structure GA"

    Hi,
    Please help on the below issue:-
    We are carrying settlement of order  (Period end activities ) for  CO88 .  We are getting the following error complete allocation structure GA.
    Please guide us.
    Regards
    Srinivas

    Hi,
    Go to Allocation structure and maintain the Source and Settlement cost element for various cost groups in the structure.
    And maintain this Allocation Structure in the settlement profile for your Production/Process orders.
    Regards
    Balaji

  • Error message when doing settlement for Internal order

    Hi,
    Can someone please help me to resolve the following error:
    When trying to run settlement for an internal order, following error message is generated:
    Item 001 Order xxxxx budget exceeded
    Message no. BP603
    Diagnosis
    Budget was exceeded by xxxx amount in document item 001 Order xxxxxx.
    Also following points may be relevant:
    - System status ISBD for Internal Order is active
    - There is no PR/PO for the order, direct invoice from FI is created through tcode FB50
    - Availability control: Activation Type 1, Overall field ticked in customization
    - Tolerance  Limits:  Availability control action .... Usage 85 % - Warning message, Usage 100 % - Error message
    Thanks,
    Ankita

    Hi Loong,
    Thanks for reply.
    I have already tried drilling down the report S_ALR_87013019 , however following are the only things available from the report.
    1. There is a year independent overall budget for the order of 92500 amt.
    2. Actual in 2009 is 7870.41 and in 2010 is 77980.24. So the total actual amt is 85850.65 overall.
    3. The available budget is 6649.35. i.e Over budget minus actual utililized amounts.
    Since, in the report it shows that the budget is available then I am unable to figure out why does it give error for exceeding budget by amt 50100.65 at the time of settlement.
    Regards,
    Ankita

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • Table name for Internal order group and Profit center group

    Hello Friends,
    Could any one provide me the table for Internal order group and Profit center group.
    We are developing new customized report and user requested internal order group and Profit center group in the selection criteria.
    I have checked for this tables but found only these fields in structures.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ravi Kiran.

    Or use FM [G_SET_TREE_IMPORT|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/advancedsearch?query=g_set_tree_import] to read the hierarchy/Group. (Read FM and FG documentation, you can also add break-point and call some S_ALRxxx transaction which use this FM for the objects you need).
    Regards,
    Raymond

  • System status for Internal order

    Dear SAP gurus,
    I want to automate the system status for Internal order that at the time of Final billing of invoice , the Internal order should be closed automatically.
    Is there any setting to do this.
    Thanks,

    Automatic option is not available. you need to customise for automisation purpose.
    you can do teco complete by changing the internal order. for the bulk you write LSMW or SCATT.
    thanks
    ANJI

  • For internal order settlement rule amount column is requied instead %

    Hi Gurus,
    For internal order settlement rule percentage is there but business wants  to settle from AUC to final asset by amount wise how can we do this.
    I tried to change the investment profile but it is coming amount field while saving it is not displaying.
    Please help in this regard
    Thank you.
    Ranganadh

    Hi
    Check the path
    IMG>Controlling>Internal Orders>Actual Posting>Settlement>Maintain Settlement Profile>Maintain Settlement Profile.
    Here there is a tick for amount settlement under Indicators. You need to maintain this check box for your requirements.
    Regards
    Sanil Bhandari

  • BAPI KPF6 POST PLAN COST FOR INTERNAL ORDER AND COST ELEMENT

    Hi all gurus,
    I would like to use in a custom report a BAPI/Function Module that help me to simulate KPF6 in order to post planning costs for internal order and cost element (layout 1-401).
    So the input should be:
    1) Version
    2) period from
    3) periodo to
    4) year
    5) internal order n.
    6) cost element n.
    7) value
    I found a lot of BAPI but don't know the correct one and how to use it (example how to fill the input value).
    Can anyone help me on that?
    Kind Regards

    In additio  to the previous I found the BAPI_COSTACTPLN_POSTPRIMCOST but don't know if it's the correct one and how to use it (some example fitting the my case will be very appreciated).
    If the quoted BAPI is correct.
    I tested it filling all fields as following:
    HEADERINFO:
    CO_AREA=FFCA
    FISC_YEAR=2008
    PERIOD_FROM=001
    PERIOD_TO=012
    DOC_HDR_TX='blank'
    INDEXSTRUCTURE:
    OBJECT_INDEX=000001
    VALUE_INDEX=000004 (hope this point at Interna Order)
    ATTRIB_INDEX=000000
    COOBJECT:
    OBJECT_INDEX=000001
    ORDERID=ZO53-08IMZ
    TOTVALUE:
    VALUE_INDEX=000004
    COST_ELEM=3224048
    FIX_VALUE= 200,0000
    DIST_KEY_FIX_VAL=2
    The Return table is set to 0. Nothing happens.....I suspect something related to indexstructure or index is wrong..
    Could anyone help me on that?
    Kind Regards

  • I am trying to find a function module or BAPI for internal order change. I

    I am trying to find a function module or BAPI for internal order change. I did come across a function module ALE_INTERNALORDER_DB_CHANGE which directly updates the internal order using insert statements. Can i use this for internal order change or this is any other Function module for updating the internal order.
    I dont want to use BDC as a option. Please suggest.

    This is possible using the Rotator Component Widget from Infosemantics.com.au but it is only compatible with  SWF output, not HTML5.
    Go to this page and scroll down to the video tutorials about the Rotator Component widget:
    http://www.infosemantics.com.au/adobe-captivate/youtube-video-tutorials

Maybe you are looking for