Mid month payroll area change

Hi,
i am at the client site and I have been asked to change the payroll area of few employees in the system but system is not allowing me to do that.
What is the best possible solution so that i can change the payroll area so that the changes are reflected in the payroll cycle of the same month?
Regards
Aryan

For this ,
You need to log in SAP system
Once you log in the system then give the TCODE PA30 ( Maintain HR DATA )
Once that screen has appier then you need to give the PERNR No for whome you need to change the Payroll Area.
Give the PERNR No.
Give the infotype 001 ( Organizational Assignment ) and click up on the change ......
Once you get Screen "Change Orgnazation Assigment" you can see the field "Payr.area" give the appropriate Payr.area and save .............
Like this you can change the Payr.area for the Personal NO

Similar Messages

Payroll area change is not possible

Hi,
When we are doing promotion action, i.e, one paryoll area to another paryoll area, In actions whatever the date we are giving is taking, but when come to org assignment it is not allowing to save with that date and throwing error " payroll area change is not possible at the end of payroll period"
For example: In Actions start date is 04.01.2010, in org assign is not allowing to save the entry with that date, but if we give 01.01.2010, it is allowing to save the record. As paryroll period is starting of the month to end of the month, that is the reason it allowing the start date of the month in org assign, but user wants the record from his desired date..
Please help me on the issue.
Thanks & Regards
Kumar

Hi Kumar,
Mid-payroll payroll area change is allowed for only a few countries including:
Canada (country grouping 07), the United States (10), South Africa (16), Mexico (32), Taiwan (42), Finland (44), and Spain (04)
Please check the notes below for further reference:
1104733
849363
744563
Regards,
Dilek

IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

Geeks,
I have a situation wherein I need to change the WSR of a employee mid- month - which I did thru PA30 by creating a new IT7 with start date as 14 july 2014 (below is the overview screen shot of IT7 after change)
With Basic as 5000, I ran his payroll from 01-july 2014 to 31-july 2014, but when I look the form, its displaying Basic as 3518 (I haven assigned any unpaid or LOP). Can anybody help me out in knowing wht mistake m I doing?
regards
Tahir

In the IT to or from INP1, I can see that the Partial Period Parameters WageTypes /801, /802, /803 and /806 all total 100% (or 10.000,000), while /804 totals 70.37% and /805 totals 174.19%.
In the IT from XVAL, it can be seen that all valued WageTypes were done so by using /804.
I am not familiar with Payroll for India, but here are a two questions :
1 - If your Payroll Schema includes function PRINT with Par1 = NP and Par2 = PART, check your Partial Period Parameters and try to identify why /804 totals 70.37%.
2 - What kind of Absences or Attendances has the employee to justify that ratio?
You have mentioned that "Basic Salary" WT 1000 has Pr.Cl.10 with value 04, meaning that Partial Period Parameter /804 will be used for the factoring of that WT, and that is what happens.
The solution to your problem lies in understanding why the factors /802 and /804 are identical for the first portion of the payroll period but are different for the second part of the period.
3   /802   01     40 740,74
3   /802   02     59 259,26
3   /804   01     40 740,74
3   /804   02     29 626,63

Issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of

Dear Experts,
I have an issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of the Month.
One employee was retired on 29th of March, so his payroll area was changed from biweekly to monthly on 29th. For retire we are running the payroll on 8th of every month. When we are running payroll for April he has received only 29th and 30th retire salary, by the time he is not yet retired also.
In this case the main problem is monthly payroll time is early then biweekly. so the employee is getting retire salary then his regular pay.
Can you guide me where we can control that monthly payroll area should not be triggered at this movement.
Thanks
Chandra

You can do that but it is not that easy as it sounds if you have to do that over a period of say 10-20 years...lot of operational work!!
Also say if you load the retiree action one month ahead say on 03/01/2011. And the employee is retiring on 03/29.
Retire payroll is on 04/08
Biweekly is on 04/15
Now you decide to lock the employees after the 1st biweekly check of March...say which was process 14 days before 04/15 would be 04/01. The employee number is locked between 04/01 to 04/15. For 14 days you have locked these employees!!
What happens if there is adjustment pay...you have to manually go and unlock the employee and lock him after the adjustment check.
I will let you decide based on the comfort, SAP effort, Operational effort and system maintenance.

Issue on Changing the Payroll Area in Mid of the Month from Biweekly to Mon

Dear Experts,
I have an issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of the Month.
One employee was retired on 29th of March, so his payroll area was changed from biweekly to monthly on 29th. For retire we are running the payroll on 8th of every month. When we are running payroll for April he has received only 29th and 30th retire salary, by the time he is not yet retired also.
In this case the main problem is monthly payroll time is early then biweekly. so the employee is getting retire salary then his regular pay.
Can you guide me where we can control that monthly payroll area should not be triggered at this movement.
Thanks
Chandra

Hi Dilek,
If splits will be there definitely there will be two wagetypes but the amounts they'll have will be based on the rates of those periods.
Suppose an employee got payscale increase on 11th of the month, then employee will be paid at the rate of first payscale for first ten days then @ of second payscale on second 20 days.
So there won't be any inconsistency.
Regards,
Tomesh

Change payroll area in middle of the month

Currently I had face a problem where this staff whose is reentering the company in the middle of the month. Before this he use payroll area XX, after he reenter the company in the middle of the month, the payroll area need to be change to AA. But the system did not allow this with this error: "Payroll area change possible only at the end of the payroll period". So i was force to change the payroll area only when the date was at the end of the payroll period.
Is there any way to rectify this issue? I also being informed that there was a standard report to do this, but i could not find it,weather is it exist or not.

Is there any way to do by force, as i had been told that it could be done by using a standard program, but he could not remember it.
Is it payroll could not be running if half month payroll are is XX and other half is AA if possible to change the payroll area? Why?

Costing Sheet Overhead Rate Change Mid Month

Does SAP Support a mid month overhead rate change in a costing sheet? I have an overhead rate change effective 5/12/2007, but my PM Order is not recognizing the change unless the Basic Start Date of the order is 6/1/2007.

hi
it will not support mid month overhead. it should be either period basis or yearly basis.
regards,
siva

Change the Payroll area in mid of the month.

Hi Experts,
Why is it not advisable to change the Payroll area in mid of the month.
Regards,
Tomesh

Hi Dilek,
If splits will be there definitely there will be two wagetypes but the amounts they'll have will be based on the rates of those periods.
Suppose an employee got payscale increase on 11th of the month, then employee will be paid at the rate of first payscale for first ten days then @ of second payscale on second 20 days.
So there won't be any inconsistency.
Regards,
Tomesh

Mid Month Transfer Issue in Payroll

Hello All
Good Day!
We have two payrolls defined, Payroll A and Payroll B and both has separate Legal entity but Business Group for both Payroll is same. We are having an issue when employee transfers from Payroll A to B or vice versa as mentioned below :
1) Lets assume Employee transfers from Payroll A to Payroll B as on 17 Oct 2012.
2) As Business Group is same , employee remain in the same BG.
3) So we tried to terminate the employee as on 17-Oct-2012 and re-hired as on 18-Oct-2012 in the Payroll B. We need two IRP5 (tax certificate) so we need to terminate the employee from one payroll and reinstate in new payroll.
4)) We have most of the recurring element configured to Terminate as Last Standard Process so all the recurring elements ended as on 31-Oct-2012, i think this should have been Actual Termination Date but as Payroll is running from last 2 years so this will be too big to change now.
5) Now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee got full month salary in Payroll A which is not correct as employee worked up to 17-Oct-2012.
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
Could you please provide your input as what is the best practice to handle this mid month transfer ?
Thanks
Gaurav

Hi, Gaurav..
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
=>I guess.. The "Final Process Date" set as 31-Oct-2012 when you end this employee, isn't it?
Actual Termination Date will let person end at this date, that's mean person record's effective_end_date will equal to the Actual Termination Date and create a new person record after Actual Termination Date.
Last Standard Process Date let all elements ended as this date.
Final Process Date means you can process payroll run before this date, and the assignment record's effective_end_date will equal to Final Process Date. That's why your payroll run includes this person. There's no elements because all elements ended on 17-Oct-2012, system doesn't get any element on 31-Oct-2012.
Best Regards,
Changhua

Payroll : Mid Month joining

Dear Experts,
Generally Payroll will be generated based on Payroll area ( Example D1 ) for group of employees.
But one Person ( Ex : Person No - 1000 ) joined in one company in mid of the month and he belongs to same Payroll area ( D1)
how can we run Payroll the payroll for that employee ( Person No - 1000 )?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
Sudheer

Hi ,
Run payroll as usually as you have done previously, the new joining employee will be picked up automatically by the payroll driver. He will be paid from the date of joining (on prorate basis).
for ex employee total sal for full month is 1000 if he joins on 15 of the month after running payroll he will get 500.
Thx
jinnu

Changing Plan Mid-month "pro-rated" unclear and deceptive practice. C.S. offers no help

I recently found myself having to up my plan minutes for a family emergency. I went online and checked my usage I was at 394 minutes out of a 450 minute plan, so I elected to switch to the 900 plan minute for the month, ancipating I would go over in the next week. I was given options to back date it or start on that day, as I had clearly not gone over my alloted minutes, I chose to start it as of that day.
My Bill came and I received 69 dollars in minute overages. How was this explained, that by prorating the bill, they divide the cylcel in half, not only by "dollars" which seemed to be the explantion I received online, but by minutes. SO my minute alotment of 450 was reduced to 240 for those two weeks I oriignally had 450 minutes in. They billed as if that was my allowance therefore saying I now went over my plan by 154 minute which I was billed to the tune of 69.00 dollars, plus the addition of the monthly increase in plan.
My question to any logical rational intelligent person would be, why would someone choose to up there minute plan, before they went over, just to then be charged for minutes they would not have been had they not upped there plan to the next level. This defies common sense and any explanation would as well.
Customer service sadly would not even hear or understand this, only to say this is a valid "cost" and I should have read the "disclosure" statement or called if I had questions and not use online services. I asked both the operator and a supervisor for the terms of the disclosure agrement and neither could tell me what it said. However in reading billing question answers they respond "For example, if you changed rate plans during the middle of your billing cycle, your statement should contain a charge for the old rate plan (according to the number of days in your cycle that you were on the old rate plan) and the new rate plan. " yes that makes sense but no where does it say your minutes may be reduced up until this point and you may occur additional charges not already used. by ironically "increasing your minute plan".
I am waiting for a manager to return my call, As a long time customer of verizon whom have promoted them and the new iphone all over facebook and such to my friends I am very discouraged by this practice, and the lack of resolve.

Mike I appreciate that at least you are familiar with what the disclosure statement says, despite othert reps not being able to recite it. However the term "may" be in inself is Misleading, if "airtime" is prorated the statement should read "YOUR airtime MINUTES will be prorated and reduced to this point, possibly resulting in overages and additional charges" The wording is intentionally misleading. If it weren't MIke, why would anyone KNowingly select an option that would then cause them to owe an additional 69.00 dollars they didnt owe at the time, when UPPING their PLAN?
The fact that Customer Service Can't see that as a very real possiblity and just is dissmisive saying You should have read the disclosure statement., and it is a valid charge tells, me they run into this frequently and they have a script to read from to cover themselves, leaving the HUman Element out of the equation. It is sad enough I had to Up my plan only temporarily while dealing with a tragic family situation, to add insult to injury. To me the term "may" be prorated and "may" result in additional overages meant, that if I had gone over my minutes prior to the change I would be charged, because MIKE that is COMMON SENSE. and a REASONABLE person May think that. Cutomer Service Reps could at least acknowledge that as a very real Understanding of how that line could be interupted, and that a reasonable person would not otherwise increase their plan only to be charge for something they would not have otherwise been charged.
I am almost positive in the Future this wording will be Changed after the continued Myriad of complaints. From what I already understand the new "changing minutes and not plan" option already has changed it. SO why not make things right for long time loyal customers now. I actually want to reduce my plan back down now as it was a temporary emergency however I DONT dare do it mid month again, SO I will wait another 2 weeks and pay even more.
This is NOT ME and my misunderstanding, just googling the topic comes up with tons and tons of complaints, articles written on the topic and so fourth. I have been waiting days for someone as promised to call me back as well and that hasnt happened. I have talked to so many friends about this many verizon customers and all say this can't be right, because it DOESNT MAKE SENSE, despite it being "valid" as you say.

Mid month Hiring payroll

Hi,
There is a scenario, when we hire a person in mid month, so how payroll driver will calculate its payroll.
Do we need to run payroll twice for this employee.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
If it is monthly payroll, no need to run payroll in mid month, we can run the payroll as usual like end of the month(whenever we are running payroll that date).
For mid month of joinging employes, system will take care with the help of INP1 rule for india, XPPF rule for internaational.
No need to run twice payroll.
Based his/her joining date payment will be happen.
Regards
Devi.

How to handle mid month proration in a calendar to month payroll

Appreciate if some 1 can help in handling the mid month proration in a calendar to month payroll.
i.e if an employee desides to quit his job by giving a 24 hours notice say in the middle of the month, then how can one handle such cases in monthly payroll calculations?
Plz help me......!
regards

1. Create a Proration Event Group grouping all the events (here date track update on assignment_status_id of per_all_assignments_f). Attach the event group to elements that you want to prorate.
2. Write a Proration Formula (Formula Type Payroll Run Proration) sth like this.
inputs are pay_value,
proration_start(date),
proration_end(date)
l_days = days_between(prorate_end,prorate_start) + 1
pay_value = pay_value * l_days / 31 /* instead of hardcoding 31 u can get the days_between period start and period end db items */
return pay_value.
3. Attach the above proration formula to the elements that you want to prorate ( element screen > proration tab)
Hope this helps.
Regards,
sharath

Promotion action - payroll run - not allowing to change payroll area in IT1

Hi Friends,
My client has the following query:
"One of the employee has been promoted from employee group 2 (Workmen) to employee group (Management Staff). We have run promotion action now, that is after running pay roll for the month of May 2011. Now it is not allowing to change the pay roll area in orga. assignment effective from 01.04.2011, please do the needful on priority to run pay roll for the month of May 2011."
Can anyone please help me and tell me what needs to be done in such cases.
Eagerly awaiting your reply.
Thanks a ton..
Regards,
Evangelist@

Hi,
As you said that you have already configured ABKRS feature for defaulting payroll area based on your employee group.
So when you run the promotion action it should actually pick up the default payroll area according to new employee group.
Are you able to do that? or did you manually change it on IT 0001 screen.
If you want it to be automatically defaulted then check your feature DFINF it should have value X if you want it from customising or leave it blank if it should be copied form the previous record
cheers
Ajay

Problem in Payroll (mid month payment)

Dear All,
We have Monthly Payroll type. But I have to make incentive and some arrears payments in mid of May, 2010 that is after the execution of April Payroll and before execution of May Payroll.
Please suggest how this can be done?
Regards,
Kanupriya

Hi Kanupriya,
You need to some configuration in the SPRO path provided below.
SPRO --> Payroll --> Payroll - USA --> Off-Cycle Activities
Then maintain 0267 with off cycle reason
Run off cycle Payroll using off cycle reason
The go to Work bench for Off-cycle - Transaction Code PUOC_10
Clik on History tab - chceck result - and Save result.
Regards
Venu

Mid month payroll area change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for