Minimum order surcharge AMIZ

I have a requirement that minimum order value surcharge should not be applied if we are not able to deliver part of goods because of internal reasons.
Example: - We have a setup (AMIW/AMIZ) where if order value is less than £ 1500 then there is a surcharge of £20. Our pricing get re-fershed at the time of invoicing (pricing type B in delivery to billing copy control) so suppose I have a order with two lines with total value of £2000  (line 10= £1400, line 20 =£600) surcharge of £20 is not applicable which is correct at this stage.
Situation 1- If both lines are delivered and invoiced together surcharge does not get applied--which is correct and we want this.
Situation 2-If customer requested delivery date is different for both lines and separate delivery and invoice is created surcharge of £20 is applied in both invoice--which is correct and we want this.
Situation3-If customer requested delivery date is same for both lines and separate delivery and invoice is created because we do not have stock at that time, surcharge of £20 is applied in both invoice--which is current situation and we DO NOT want this.
Please Help
Vishal

Hello Gurus,
If any body has solution to the Vishal's questions please respond, as I am also facing similar kind of problem.
Regards,
Hari Challa.

Similar Messages

  • Recalculation of minimum order surcharge  in invoice

    Hi  experts,
    i have activated minimum order value (MOV ) and minimum order  surcharge (MOSC) in sales order.
    Now i have conflicting scenario
    case 1 )   multiple  SO  where  MOSC  is  applicable .....they have one delivery.......and in invoice it should disappear.
    in copy control, price type used to recalculate the price...it is working perfectly all right.
    Case 2 )  one  SO ...........( beacuse of multiple schedule line )........multiple delivery multiple invoice.........here MOSC is not there in SO , so it should not re appear in invoice. 
    But with copy control settings  if recalculation taking place MOSC  is appearing.
    SO how to handle the scenario in standard sap ?
    regards
    anish

    hi sharan,
    The issue is  MOSC should only be recalulated when it is active in sales order.
    Case 1:  Customers places  many small orders  with same requested delivery date. Now in eache order MOSC would be active.
    But combining all into a single delivery and subsequent billing  should remove the value. Here recalculation of price in copy control /price type settings would  meet that requriment.
    Case 2 :  Customer places large order . Material has many schedule lines.
    So recalculatipon of price would activate MOSC which i do not want.
    Therefore i am thinking of applying a new code with the help of ABAP-er to create new price type and assign in copy control ?
    or should that be made possible  via alternate calculation type against AMIZ conditon type.
    looking for expert's opininon
    regards
    anish

  • Minimum Order Surcharge Issue -Urgent-

    Hello Experts,
    We have an issue with minimum order surcharges.  Our minimum order value is $2500.00.  This is the scenario. 
    1)  We create a sales order let's say with 10 line items (totaling $3400.00, so we minimum order surcharge should not be active). 
    2)  We partially delivered and billed the items on the sales (let's say line items 1-7). 
    3)  Our customer changed their mind and did not want one of the items that has not been delivered yet, so we delete the item from the sales order.  (Order total now is $3200). 
    My issue is when we do this, the minimum order surcharge is active when it should be, because the total order value is above $2500.  We should be able to delete items off the sales order, without having to worry getting chraged a surcharge fee.  Why is it charging the minimum order surcharge when we do this?  Is there a setting in SAP that I can modify to make this work, via condition type, etc? 
    We are on SAP 4.7c
    Any help will be greatly appreciated and pts.  Thank you for your time!
    Best Regards,
    WC

    Hi,
    Your question is in in correct place, this is SRM related area.
    Thank you

  • Minimum order value

    Hi All,
    We are trying to use the standard condition type AMIW and AMIZ to achieve the minimum sales order processing, but for some reason this does not seem to work.
    Per OSS Note 999587,18173 we have the necessary condition type maintained as well as they have been included in the pricing procedure as mentioned in the note.
    The issue is although the minimum value is not reached, the corresponding surcharge condition has a value of 0. subtotal has been assigned value 'D' for AMIW however WORKD has a value of 0.
    Settings in pricing procedure
    Condition type AMIW
    Field Value
    Statistical X
    Subtotal D
    Account key Blank
    Condition type AMIZ
    Field Value
    Alt.calc.type 13
    Account key ERS
    We have also setup the condition record, with a fixed value of 200USD for AMIW. I was hoping by using this function the system would determine a minimum order surcharge value if the net value of the order was below 200USD.
    Has anyone been able to use  the minimum sales order value function? We are currently on ECC6.0 and our patch level for SAP_AP is at 0020 release 700.
    Any help or insight is much appreciated.
    Thanks
    LD

    Hi,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/93/7434de546011d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm
    Also assign Requirement as 2 and try
    Kapil

  • Use of minimum order value condtion AMIZ and AMIW

    I am using the above standard SAP conditions to calculate a minimum order value. It is working fine for an order with a single order item but for multi-item orders it is only doing the calcualtion for the last item.  As per standard SAP i have AMIW defined as group condtion but this seems to being ignored.
    Do I need to also fill in the Group Condtion Routine (GRLNR) on AMIZ or AMIW in order for this to work?
    Regards
    Dave Jones

    Settings in Pricing Procedure
    You must enter these condition types in the pricing procedure you use. The following settings are required:
    Condition type AMIW
    Field Value
    Statistical X
    Subtotal D
    Account key Blank
    Condition type AMIZ
    Field Value
    Alt.calc.type 13
    Account key ERS
    Using Referenced Conditions
    The minimum order value function uses referenced condition records. Condition type AMIZ references condition type AMIW. Referencing conditions means that different condition types can share the same condition records.
    Creating Condition Records
    If you use minimum order value requirements, you must create condition records for condition type AMIW. In these condition records, you specify customers and the corresponding minimum order values. During pricing, the system automatically uses these condition records as a reference for determining the relevant minimum order value surcharges (Condition type AMIZ).
    If you want to specify minimum order values that are not customer-dependent but instead are based, for example, on a sales organization, you must create a new condition table with the appropriate key.
    Dependent functions
    Condition referencing is controlled by two fields in condition type definition. For minimum order value processing, the settings for condition type AMIZ are as follows:
    Field Value
    Ref.condition type AMIW
    Ref.application V

  • Process Sales Order based on minimum order

    Hi Sap gurus,
    Can any one Help me Out regarding How the System should have capability to process Sales Order based on minimum order quantity and minimum order value and How we will map In sap
    Thanks
    Points will rewards
    Regards
    Rajesh

    Hi,
    We can set the control for Min order quantity in the Sales org1 view. Like wise we can control min order value also.
    For that we have to use two condition types AMIW & AMIZ.
    AMIW is min order value, where as AMIZ is min ord surcharge
    Let's say AMIW value is 50,000.If the order value is less than 50,000 then AMIZ comes into picture.Amiz compares the automatically determined order value and AMIW value.The difference of those two values Amiz takes as surcharge and it overwrites the automatically determined order value with this value.
    Like wise we can maintain min order value also by using this two cond types.
    In the pricing procedure
                            subtotal      req   Altcal   Altcond+bv
    AMIW                D
    AMIZ                                  2         13
    Award me points if u satisfy
    Thanks,
    Sudheer

  • Minimum order value maintainance in B2B order

    Hello Gurus,
    We are on CRM 5.0. In b2b web shop, there is a requirement that order should not be saved if the value of the order is below a minimum value for all customers. Addition of surcharges as in AMIW / AMIZ  is not what the business wants. We are proposing to either hardcode the values in the jsp page or store the minimum values in a z table and change the code in the order .jsp file such that a check is made in the z table on save.  Is there a standard solution for this?
    Useful solutions will be rewarded with points.
    Regards,
    Srinivas

    Hi,
    Try configuring from CRM side(similar to minimum order qty and pice) instead of specific custom enhancments.
    regards,
    laxman
    Edited by: laxman on Mar 13, 2008 9:33 PM

  • Minimum Order Value for an internet sales order in the webshop

    Hi Guys,
    I have a requrement of maintaining Minimum Order Value (MOV) for an order created in B2B webshop.
    We have a condition type AMIZ which supports the same function in ECC. Will it support CRM too?
    Current implementation is CRM 5.0 and the backend is R/3 4.7.
    Thanks in advance,
    Srinivas

    Hi Srinivas,
    I believe condition type AMIZ is available in CRM by standard. So its should support. Offcourse you ll have to assign the required requirement routines / condition base values.
    Regards,
    Gaurav Gera

  • Cancelling order discounts when below Customer's Minimum Order value

    I've been reading what I can find about discount conditions etc and am slightly confused as all the examples seem to relate to item line situations. We need to have a setup where all possible discounts are cancelled if the order total value is less than a given minimum order value (or threshold) related to that particular customer - and not based upon any line item value.
    We do not use Minimum Order Value as per the SAP examples given i.e. orders not accepted below the MOV and therefore surcharges added. As mentioned we use a threshold value for most customers under which discounts do not apply.
    Because of this we cannot automatically email or fax acknowledgements, and we have a massive time consuming checking operation for orders added to ensure mistakes are not made i.e. discounts applied incorrectly before the acknowledgements are sent out.
    Can anyone advise as to where I can find the path to getting a solution to this problem.
    Thanks
    Jim Jackson
    Edited by: Jim Jackson on Feb 20, 2009 9:11 AM

    I understant AMIW is Header condtion type - statistical- and has the MOV value for the specified customer.
    Maintain AMIW as Header / Line condition type.( T Code V/06)
    Create the condition reocord for AMIW with EXCLUSIVE Indicator X.(VK11)
    Then create a requirement for all the discount condition types, if the total order value = or > AMIW value then do not check the exclusion indicator( KOMP - KZNEP), ELSE check the exclusion indicator.
    ( T Code VOFM)
    During order save - automatically repirce the order in Userexit_save_document_prepare or userexit_save_document.
    If there is a partial delivery, during Invoicing if the copy control(delivery to Invoice) has carry out new pricing B, the above setting might fail. Maintain the copy control setting to copy pricing elements unchanged and redetermine taxes OR try to determine the condition values in the invoice from the order.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Sai

  • Minimum order quantity and Minimum material quatity in pricing

    Hi SAP gurus
    Please help me to understand these and help me on this issue.
    what is the difference between Minimum order quantity and Minimum material quatity.
    where and how to handle this situation in standard SAP.
    EX: if I am dealing with all the customers for material 1, material2 material3.......up to 50 materials.If I wiould like to check minimum order quatity only for few materials (let us say material1 minimum 5 quatity and material 2 minimum 5 quanity and material1 +material2 combines 10 quatity is also Ok) and if any customer not  buying in this category automatically $100 fee(surcharge?) has to apply for this order.
    How to set up this,please step by step understanding required.
    help me.
    Thanks
    Prasad

    Hi,
        tcode(mm02) ->enter your material no -> goto sales org1. data
           pls maintain these fields.
          Min order qty -
           Min delivery qty -
    so what ever the material u can put the qty restriction, maintain all materials.
    Reward points , if helpful.
    Regards,
    Hari shankar

  • Minimum order qty for Stock transport orders

    Hello
    I wonder if there is any way to make the following fields from the Sales org 1 view in the material master to apply on Stock transport orders (ME21N, with subsequent delivery created in VL10B):
    Minimum order qty
    Minimum delivery qty
    Delivery unit
    As of now in our system, it only works for Sales orders and related deliveries. But not for Stock transport orders with a supplying plant.
    Also, if there is any other way to implement minimum order qty funcitonality and delivery for Stock transport orders, pls advice.
    Thanks,
    OT

    Hello
    We are in an intracompany business case. The supplying and recieving plant are in the same company.
    The situation is as follows: we are planning all replenishment manually without any involvement of MRP.
    What we would like to achieve is the same functionality as of the minimum order/delivery quantities material master fields in the material master.
    So when the planner creates the stock transfer order, he keys in supplying plant, material and quantity manually, then the warning message about the minimum order qty should appear.
    So far I have not found any way to do this. Any ideas are greatfully received.
    BR,
    OT

  • Minimum order quantity for sales orders

    Hi,
    I need to check the configuration settings where the sales orders can be blocked if the ordered quantity is less than that of minimum order quantity.
    Pls threw some light on this.
    Points assured
    Kitty

    Dear Krishna
    Go To OVAH t code
    message class V4 and message no 082
    Change from warning to error
    The mininum order qty for a material can be set in sales org data 1 tab
    If for a material mininum order qty is set to 10 and if an order is placed for anything less than 10 you will get error message straight away
    No need of any userexit
    With Standard customizing it is possible
    This has has been tested by me recently and you too can test it
    Regards
    Raja

  • Minimum order value for Purchase orders

    Hello,
    This is my requirement: -
    A condition type needs to be created for Minimum Oder Value for PO. If the PO value is say, 450 and the condition record in 500, the PO value must be adjusted to 500. If PO value is 550, then it remains 550.
       1. Condition records must be maintained.
       2. Must be calculated on whole PO (all items) and then redistributed among items in a suitable ratio.
    This is what I have already tried:-
      1. Vendor master - No use maintain minimum order value as PO price must be adjusted through condition types.
      2. Tried replicating PMIN condition type and it works but only at item level - this calculation must take place at header level. Also it works only for calculation type "Quantity".
    Please suggest how this can be implemented, hopefully through configuration only.

    Hi,
    Please use user exit MM06E005 and code accordingly. Take help of ABAPer.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

  • Merchandise Distribution Collective PO with SLS - Minimum Order Value

    Hi,
    My organisation is using Merchandise Distribution with SLS to generate collective PO's at our consolidation platforms before generating either STO's or PO to the supply source.
    We're utilising Cross Dock and Flow Through to support our processes but in the case of Cross Dock, we're essentially asking the supply source to pick/pack the stock for the final recipient, therefore it can be quite an expensive process for the supply source (but clearly not for us).
    Before we implemented this the supply source used to simply receive orders directly from the store and within this process we applied Minimum Order Values, as per my previous statement it can be expensive and picking a couple of small items for one store and having to put them on a pallet is not economical for them in either warehousing or transportation.
    I'm looking for some broad suggestions on how this could be achieved whilst utilising collective orders.
    Our store STO's generated by MRP (and soon enough F&R) are large STO's that are not truly supply source specific, they are consolidation platform specific and the collective orders generated off the back of them are supply source specific.
    The key issue i see is that we're asking for a select group of lines within the store STO to meet an MOV of the vendor OR that we somehow ensure that the store STO's are supply source specific and then enforce some MOV logic.
    Obviously this isn't standard but it's causing our organisation big supply issues, so any thoughts or advice would be fantastic.
    Many thanks

    Hi ,
      You can not do directly in ME59N. Check for user exit for this t code.
    Thanks,
    Venkat

  • MRP and Minimum Order Recom. Batch Sizes

    I would like Purchase Order recommendations to be generated (MRP) based on minimum stock levels. If the stock is below the minimum Qty, then a PO is generated, but the minimum order Qty is ignored:
    Scenario:
    ItemCode: ABC
    Minimum Stock in WH: 40
    Current Stock in WH: 22.984
    Minimum Order Qty : 10
    MRP Generated Recomended QTY : 17.016
    As this item is purchased in lenghts of 6m's, ordering 0.016 will not be possible. We also need to order a minimum of 10.
    As you can see the minimum Order Qty is ignored. The recomendation is suppose to be in batches of 10, so for this item it should have been 20.
    SAP : B1 2007 A SP: 0 PL:47
    Any help will be apreciated greatly

    Hi,
    Welcome you post on the forum.
    Minimum Order in B1 only define the lowest order qty. It doesn't imply this is a minimum order unit. Try Order Multiple to get what you want.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

Maybe you are looking for

  • SURROUND SOUND SET UP

    I have an older surround system (Phillips) that I am trying to use with a newer Samsung Smart TV.  Basically, I am looking to have sound come out of the surround speakers.  Right now I have a verizon DVR and an Xbox 360 connected to the TV.   Any tho

  • Disappointing quality when exporting to DVD - how do I improve this?

    Hi, I've spent quite a long time producing beautiful slideshows in iPhoto '08 - complete with soundtrack, Ken Burns affects and transitions. I wished to burn this slideshow to DVD, but I was extremely disappointed with the quality of the final result

  • BWP reports are not opening

    Hi Experts, I upgraded SAP to 720 version and can no longer open my existing BWP reports. Please help me regarding this ASAP Thanks in Advance

  • Colon In  MSS Address Field

    Dear All, We are implementing MSS. Under Team Information -->Employee Information --> general Information >Personal Data iView, the address lines contain a " : "(colon) . When I check the application in the Content Administration>Web Dynpro>mss~eepro

  • Q.  eding rolling text/titles

    I thought I posted this already, but I can't find it.. so here goes again. I created rolling text/titles in white on a darkened screen as the audio played in the background. Each set of text frams appeared for a few seconds, then was replaced by the