MIRO Issue
Dear Sapgurus,
While posting the Vendor Invoice thru MIRO, system is giving error Message "Invoice already entered under accounting Document no. 2600000460 2009". reference PO no. -7000000640, Inv No. 35.
Duplicate Inv. Check option is active in Vendor master, but it should not block the posting of same invoice no. of Same vendor in two Different Fiscal year. Could you please tell me.
Regards
Surendra
Hi,
According to me if system finds the same reference then definately it will populate error message even it is in different fiscal year also.
If you are doing MIRO on the base of Goods receipt then the reference field (invoice number)will be definately different. Just check once.
Check with other replies
Regards,
Sankar
Edited by: Durgasankar.Innamuri on Jul 29, 2010 9:05 AM
Similar Messages
-
MIRO issue (urgent!), amount and quantity fields are not captured from PO
Hi,
When we try to post thought MIRO using PO as reference, quantity and amount fields are not captured. We do MIGO first and then MIRO.
GR based invoice verification in the vendor master is selected and the check mark GR-based in the PO is selected too.
We're getting this MIRO issue for "all" PO and Service Entry Sheet.
We'll appreciate your recommendation in order to fix this critical issue as soon as possible.
Thanks in advance.I was looking for copy controls and other functions. Glad this is now resolved. You need to award yourself points!
Cheers. -
Disbale Park Icon and MIRO issue
Hello all,
I had a requirement to disable the park icon in FB60 for a user. I accomplished this with removing Activity 77 from some of the objects with the help of the Basis person. However, once this was done, another user could not post MIRO as it gave a error saying that user is "not allowed to post a parked document". So the basis person resolved the objects per SU53....and the issue was fixed, but it also brought back the Park icon in FB60.
Is there a way to remove the park icon with out the user having a problem with MIRO posting?
Hope someone could shed some light to this issue.
Thank you.Hi:
Yes it will create Z T code as per your customized screen variant . Please follow the settings as given
Go to SHD0...In t code write FB60...Transaction Variant..ZFB60...Click create ... Now enter document date, vendor amount and then press enter ... A new box will appear .. There will a button at its bottom--Menu Function...Click it...A new screen will appear...In it go to menu Bar...document.. There you will see park click on it and press F2..now it will be deactivated..Exit and save..Give Package that ABAP use and save it again and again until it shows that the changes have been saved..In menu you can find the way to create t code for it .
Now you will see this ZFB60 in Standard Variants tab of SHD0.. Activate it.
Regards -
MIRO ISSUE - PLEASE HELP .
Dear All,
User had done the GRN & done the entry of excise for Rs 35,000/- by mistake but in invoice the value is Rs 36000/-, after this he had posted the invoice thriugh J1IEX, & the diffrence value Rs 1000/- is posted by J1IH, `now during MIRO the value which was posted in J1IEX is being captured & the system is allowing to post this value without ant problem but Rs 1000/- is not captured here , My question is that how to capture this difference amount so that it can be captured in MIRO , or suggest any other method to resolve this issue .
Regards
sap11Hi,
Yes, you can post by using credit memo functionality. But the debit should go to Cenvat clearing account.
Examble,
1. MIGO
Dr Inventory 30000
Cr GR/IR 30000
2. J1IEX
Dr.Cenvat Input 5000
Cr. Cenvat clearing 5000
3. J1IH
Dr. Cenvat Input 1000
Cr. Cenvat clg 1000
4. MIRO
Dr. GR/IR 30000
Dr. Cenvat clg 5000
Cr. Vendor 35000
now if you post Credit Memo
Dr. Cenvat clg 1000
Cr. Vendor ac 1000
So, your cenvat clearing account will show you the proper and correct balance.
Hope it clears your problem
Saravanan.A -
dear all,
we are purchasing from a vendor in <b>USD</b> for a long time. in vendor master currency is maintained as <b>USD.</b>
the PO was raised in USD,Now the vendor has sent us the invoice in <b>EURO.</b>
how to post in MIRO? shall we manually calculate the invoice price by converting EURO into USD and post the invoice.
regardsHi Ajay,
Go to Tcode: MIRO, Then enter the invoice date, posting date and if reference field is mandatory, enter the vendor invoice number, then against field 'Amount\, you will be the amount field and currency field, leave the amount field blank and in currency field enter currency 'EUR' for Euro.
And now in the PO reference tab, give the PO number and press enter. If currency conversions are maintained, then the amount will be now in EURO instead of USD.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Viswanath -
Hi all,
We had raised the third party Order (for licensing products) which have three Year Agreements.
On the basis of this, we had prepared the GRN for full amount. (GR Qty = PO qty)
As per the agreement, we had received the Vendor invoice on Yearly basis. Now we want to book the invoice for yearly value with full GR qty.
In the similiar fashion we will booked the rest two year invoices( when vendor send his invoice).
FOr e.g. Say PO qty is 30, unit Value is 100$ , total Po Value becomes: 3000 $ (for 3 yrs)
Now, we post the Good receipt notes for 30 qty. i.e. GR/IR Value will be 3000 $
But, we would like to book the yearly invoice on full qty and yearly value i.e. 1000$
similarly for the next two consecutive yrs, we will book the invoice 1000$ each with full qty.
i.e.
Year 1 : IR qty 30, Value to be booked : 1000$
Year 2 : IR qty 30, Value to be booked : 1000$
Year 3 : IR qty 30, value to be booked : 1000$
How this can be achieved? Or is their any alternative to book the invoice on yearly basis in this fashion.
Regards,
SheoNo.
Good receipt note will be prepared for full qty (i.e. 30 qty). but the invoicing need to be done at the yearly basis. Secondly, instead of qty split,we are looking to split the Gr/Ir value on yearly basis.
So that invoice can be prepared for yearly amt with 30 qty each.
Regards,
Sheo -
Hi everyone,
we overpaid vendor PO related invoice, vendor issue us a refund check to us. what we should do in SAP? I use MIRO issue a credit memo ,and post an incoming payment using F-52, but not sure it's the right way.
I guess my question is : If vendor already cashed the check, shall we still use MIRO to issue a creadit memo? how does the accounting work? did PO get reduced?
please advise.
thanks,Dominic,
I got the answer of difference between Subsequent Debits/Credits and credit memo:
Subsequent Debits/Credits are used in cases where the quantity is in the original invoice is to remain the same. For eg.
PO 10 - $10
Gr 10 - $10
LIV 10 - $11 (Logistics Invoice Verification)
The vendor invoice is more than that in the Purchase Order. In order to correct, the Vendor may send in another invoice for
the Increased amount or a credit memo for the increased amount.
If you approve of the price increase, post the subsequent invoice received as a Subsequent Debit/Credit Invoice.
If it is a credit memo that has been received, then post the credit memo as Subsequent Debit/Credit.
This would retain the quantity but reduce the amount.
Subsequent Debit/Credit is for the case when the credit is not for the full amount eg. if the Vendor decided to credit
only the $1 overcharged.
Credit memo is for the credit of the full amount and value. -
MIRO invoice verification problem
Hi everyone!
We have one service PO and one entrysheet in USD for 258.26 (local currency = ARS 2197.28).
Later, vendor sent an invoice in ARS for 2197.79.
User does the following:
1 - Creates the invoice using MIRO in ARS with reference to PO.
2 - Modifies the amount proposed by SAP (ARS 2197.28) and enters 2197.79.
3 - Saves the document and MIRO issues a message that says that the document is created but blocked due to amount difference.
4 - Enters MRBR to release the invoice but he sees that the difference is equal to 1939.53.
So, SAP is doing a wrong calculation using the amount in ARS (2197.79) and the amount in USD (258.26).
We tried to search an OSS note but we found nothing.
Anyone has an idea what happened here?
Thanks!
CristianMost likely scenario is that the user created the invoice for 2197.79 USD by mistake without realizing it. I cannot think of any other reason..
-
Reversing miro quantity at the time of credit memo.
HI,
pls suggest me a solution about the miro issue ,here i will explain the scenario.
Ex:PO was created for the quantity of 100, GR and Invoice was done for 100 quantity.
After invoice has been posted, 30 quantity was returned to vendor by movt type 122 from MIGO.
For this returned quantity of 30,we will have to raise a credit memo.
So normally from MIRO screen,selecting credit memo option& PO no. was entered,then system picks full quantity of 100&corresponding amount,
we use to change the quantity of 30 & corresponding amount manually.
**Is there any solution,so that system has to propose the quantity &amount for credit memo option in MIRO screen.hi,
Do one think....take help of ABAP consultant..define the below scenerio to him...ask whether its possible or not...
Use the table EKBE, where system saves all the purchasing data ie. from PO till IR...
so, now when you have returned the 30 pcs, the table would have got updated for those returns as well...
So, ask the consultant to trace returns quantities/values (add all if there are partial returns as well) and reflect it in the given field in the MIRO doc..
Check it out..
Regards
Priyanka.P -
Can I do MIRO before a MIGO. How do we justify it.
If I do MIRO before MIGO what will be its implications.
If I do MIRO in March 2006 and its MIGO in April 2006; is it possible? if not then how to solve the problem if it has been done.
Regards
VSHi ,
Its possible to do MIRO ahead of MIGO. This is the case especially when you are doing procurement with Forign trade , and your imports have to be custom cleared before you receive the goods.In such case , we do the MIRO , issue payment for the delivery costs (Transport and customs duty etc) , clear the goods from customs. Then do the MIGO , and , MIRO for the payment/ Clearing the payments for the GOODS received.
How ever , to be able to do this you will have to carefully check the options in the PO in the Invoice tab : You should not select the option " GR based Invoice verification". This check box is detrimental on how you can process the invoce.
Do few simulations using these controls and you can understand them better.
Except this explicit setting in which we intend to do the invoice verification before MIGO , in other cases system will not allow you to post the invoice,you can at the best park / hold the invoice.
Hope this information helps.
Regards
raghuramam. -
hi all,
in relation to my previous post, i need to know the sufficient stock coverage relevant matter.
1) stock coverage only happen on moving average price material?
2) need advice on below scenario.
initial stock value 1000usd , stock qty 100pc, map 10usd
new order of 100pc @ 10usd
before miro, issue inventory out of 160pc
so during miro
stock qty is 40pc, value is 400usd and map is 10usd.
the balance of 60pc or 600usd will go to prd.
correct?
thanksAnswer for Question 1:
Stock coverage is only applicable to material with moving average price control. Unplanned cost are directly posted to price difference account in Material with Standard price Control irrespective of the stock level in the system
Answer for Question 2:
Initial Stock Quantity: 100 PC Intial Stock Value: 1000 USD Moving Avearge Price: 10 USD
Ordered Quantity: 100 PC at the rate of 10 USD/PC
Accounting entry duing Goods Receipt:
Stock Account: 1000 USD
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
total Stock in the plant = 100 (inital ) + 100 (Recent GR) = 200 PC
total stcok value = 1000 (iniital) + 1000 (Recent GR) = 1000 USD
Moving Average Price = 2000/200 = 10 USD/PC
160 Pieces has been issued
Stock in the Plant: 40 PC Only
Accouting entry during Invoice Posing:
Assumption 1: You are posting invoice for 100 PC of material at 10 USD/PC. No difference in PO price and Invoice Price
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Sub-leger Account: 1000 USD
Assumption 2: You are posing invoice for 100 PC of material at 11 USD/PC. PO price is 10 USD/PC. In this case stock coverage comes into picture
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Subledge Account: 1100 USD
STock Account: 40 USD (because only 40 PC are available in the stock)
Price Difference Account: 60 USD
Assumption 2: You are posing invoice for 100 PC of material at 9 USD/PC. PO price is 10 USD/PC. In this case stock coverage comes into picture
GR/IR Clearing Account: 1000 USD
Vendor Subledge Account: 9 USD
STock Account: 40 USD (because only 40 PC are available in the stock)
Price Difference Account: 60 USD -
Issue while posting through MIRO
Hi,
I am posting through MIRO.
I am using two POs in MIRO from different contracts.
When I add them for one PO amount and QTY feild is filled up properly,
but for other the value of QYT is filled into amount and qty field.
Could any one help in solving this issue.
Thanks in advance.Hi
You ae trying to post two POs from different contracts (i assume for same vednor)
When you allocate the first PO, everythin is fine
when you subsequently allocate the second PO, the vale and qty fields are not populated properly.
Is this right?
What values are going to the qty and value fields of second PO? -
Document splitting issue while posting MIRO transaction
Hello All
I have a piculiar related to document splitting while posting MIRO entry and this issue started after defaulting the profit center
to the tax gl.
The scenario is like this
While posting a vendor invoice document where there is a difference in the invoice value and stock is allready consumedn
hence system will try to post the difference to the material difference account.
The following is the asccounting entries
01 vendor a/c cr 1000
02 gr/ir a/c dr 800 pc from po document
03 tax g/l 180 default pc
04 inventory diff 20
the error message
system is not able to determine the profit center at line item 04 and message is
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 004 not filled
The document splitting settings are all standards related to vendor invoice ..................
One important point to be noted here is that this issue is come after defaulting the profit center at tax gl.
But we cannot remove those default pc also.
Can be their any solution on this
Kindly suggest
ThanksHi
In addition to my previous mail i want to add that
i tried to add even expense item category to splitting rule of business transaction and transaction variant.
Even then it doers not work.
other then is as per standard document splitting rule the expense item category is not included in invoice verication buisness transaction.
Thanks
alok -
Issue in MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost
Hi,
We are facing a problem during MIRO (Planned Delivery Cost)...
First, We create Two PO's with Freight Value (use diff. vendors in both PO). During MIRO (including both PO), we done Invoicing with Goods / Service Items...when we are trying to create MIRO of Freight value (Planned Delivery Cost)... a pop-up open for choose the Vendor...
Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
Please guide, how to solve this...During MIRO only 2 vendor should appear in that pop-up window...
thanksHI,
Here, Issue is that only 2 Vendors should be there BUT there shows many vendors to choose..
many vendor means how match all vendor list?
have you activate vendor partner function at your end ? if yes check following things
check vendor master record and check Invoicing party of that vendor ,also check invoice party of main vendor
you may get invoicing party of both vendor there
Regards
Kailas Ugale -
Issue with reversal of MIRO for Planned Delivery Cost
Hi Xperts
We have found out an issue while reversing the MIRO document for Planned Del costs. When we have done the MIRO, the accounting entry got correctly posted with correct account keys.Conditions are not inventoried.
However, when we had reversed it - the stock account got hit.Do not understand, why that happened.Do you have any clue?
1. Suppose we have done the MIRO for Del Cost & then performed GR.Now Stock has already consumed & afterwards we have found that the MIRO for Del Cost is wrong & reverse - in this scenario shall the Stock account will get a hit????
2. I have maintained Price Control "V" in Material Master.However, I have maintained a Standard Price by mistake.In that case shall SAP ignores the MAP & takes Standard Price into account & post PRD??
Regards
SoumickHi,
Before checking Planned Delivery costs accounting documents in MIRO posting and MIRO cancellation document, 1st check how Planned Delivery costs designed for your procurement process.
Use t.code:ME23N, check your Purchase order
Option-1:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account and at the same time Planned Delivery costs posted to Separate Planned Delivery costs G/L account.
OR
Option-2:
Is Planned Delivery costs posted to Planned Delivery costs G/L account ONLY
OR
Option-3:
Is Planned Delivery costs added to inventory account ONLY.
Based the above one setting, system will post goods receipt and invoice posting document with corresponding accounting entries. Also cancellation of invoice posting document refer to these setting.But account posting depends on price control available in material master.
NOTE:
Standard price procedure (price control “S”):The system carries out all stock postings at a price defined in the material master. Variances in price are posted to price difference accounts.
Moving average price (price control “V”): The system valuates goods receipts with the purchase order price and goods issues with the current moving average price.Differences in price between the purchase order price and the invoice are posted directly to the relevant stock account if there is sufficient stock coverage.
Regards,
Biju K
Maybe you are looking for
-
i am trying to get serial number based on sales order line,i am getting no data since AND WSH.SOURCE_LINE_ID = OOL.LINE_ID is failing,Please help me.Im not getting what wrong im doing SELECT OOH.ORDER_NUMBER ,OOH.FLOW_STATUS_CODE ,OOH.CUS
-
Payment term in PO print preview different from PO header
We have set payment term ZI60 for vendor 2033803, but on the PO print preview it's "Payable immediately Due net" .In PO header (In delivery/invoice tab) also, it shows payment term to be ZI60...but on print preview it shows 'Payable immediately Due n
-
Has ayone experienced any problems withe latest apple tv update
who has experienced problems withe latest apple tv update???
-
Stacked sequence does not trigger
I am reviewing Pull-down Menu.vi in Labview BasicsII: Development Coarse Manual. When I go through Exercise 2-7, I never get the dialog boxes. I have the Get Menu Selection wired to the stacked sequence where it connects to the box containing the que
-
Hi! I need some information about GuiXT. Is it an old tool or is it still in use? Is there some other tool that I can use to make SAP more user friendly? Thanks, Snjezana