MSE-license uploading issue

Hi,
I have installed WCS version 7.0.164.0 and have added Mobility Service Engine to WCS. The version of MSE is 7.0.105.0. I ahve uploaded license in WCS for supporting 200 APs. Then when i am trying to upload MSE liecnse, I am getting the below error.
MSE license file could not be installed. The total license limit has been met or exceeded for the MSE and all its services. Capacity is exceeded by 5%. Reduce the license count for one or more services to be within the capacity limit and for optimal performance.
Please let me know how should i proceed further.

I'm going thru the same thing right now and this is a bit confusing. What I do know is that there are 2 types of licensing and depending on what it is you want to do you want one of the other or both. The licenses are explained below. I hope this helps.
Two types of Licenses:
•1.       wIPS – Adaptive Wireless Intrusion Prevention
•a.     Maintain a constant awareness of your RF environment to minimize legal liability, protect your brand reputation, and assure regulatory compliance.
•b.     Cisco Adaptive Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) offers advanced network security for dedicated monitoring and detection of wireless network anomalies, unauthorized access, and RF attacks. Fully integrated with the Cisco Unified Wireless Network, this solution delivers integrated visibility and control across the network, without the need for an overlay solution.
•2.       Context Aware – for locating wireless devices
•a.     With Context-Aware Software, organizations can quickly locate rogue devices, interferers, Wi-Fi clients, tagged assets, and wired devices. This physical location information provides the insight needed to improve workflow, quickly troubleshoot mobile clients, and implement asset management solutions.
Sandi

Similar Messages

Wlc-2504-k9 ap license upload issue

Hi i have 20 access points and wlc controller with 15 ap supported .I got 5 ap license but am not able to upload .
Temproray i have enabled evaluation license which is valid 12 weeks . but when i tried to upload the liecense its giving me error .
Can anybody help me the exact steps .

Hi Breeze,
I think its normal behaviour for Cisco WLCs.
Example: It happend with me.
Old licence was for 15APs
if you add 5 more ap licence to WLC then old Licence will go in inactive state but evaluation License will be in use.
After evaluation period you will get the total 20 AP licence in in use status.
This happend with me.
I think this guy I also have similer issue: https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2205144
If you still have doubts or issues then please go for TAC case.
Hope it helps.
Regards

UCCX Enhanced License upload issues

I have a site that is under the gun to finish a UCCX migration from 4.0 to 7.0 We put in for the license upgrade using a PAK but when we load it the system tells us that it is not valid to upgrade using this file from "NONE" Generally that section tells you what files you already have if you add a feature license file.
We opened a case with TAC but in the meantime we loaded an NFR license file so we could start to configure the system. I then found a PAK for 4-5 to 7 for another site that is being closed. When I got that license file back and tried to run the set-up Wizard again, it tells me the new license is not a valid upgrade from Premium and will be ignored.
Does this mean I will never be able to get off the NFR license? Am I stuck on this license file even if I get my correct one tomorrow or the next day?
thanks

Yes, that is correct that you need the 4.x main system license plus the NEW upgrade license, but the main issue here was "What do I do if my system is running incorrect licensing?" And the answer is, you need to reset the flag for the Web GUI to Fresh Install and you need to delete the references to the existing license files. Both actions are done through the Windows on-board support tool accessed via Start-->Run
I would not recomend doing this the first time without TAC on the line, but if anyone else wants to provide the command you use to access this tool, feel free. It escapes me at the moment.

Having trouble installing ProIX on new Windows 8 machine after XP crash. Get almost ll of the way through and get an error box ... contact system support. Only way out is to abort and then it un-installs. Wondering if a licensing max issue since we did

having trouble installing ProIX on new Windows 8 machine after XP crash. Get almost ll of the way through and get an error box ... contact system support. Only way out is to abort and then it un-installs. Wondering if a licensing max issue since we didn't get an opportunity to uninstall off of crashed machine?

Hey robr72339266,
With a single user license, you can install Acrobat on maximum two computers, say, your laptop at work and desktop at office.
But, you cannot use Acrobat on both the machines simultaneously.
You will first need to deactivate Acrobat from the old machine, then install and activate the software on the new OS with the same serial key.
Please Contact | Adobe to seek help on the same.
Regards,
Anubha

MSE License problem

I see an advice about we have reached 75% of clients trackin.
It says that our license can tracking 7000clientes.
Según lo que indica la web de Cisco la licencia del mse es ahora por APs no por clientes. No entiendo porque sale ese mensaje.
In Cisco web I see that MSE license is AP-based now.
"With MSE Release 7.4 and later, licenses are access point (AP)-based and not endpoint-based. In order to accommodate this, new location service licenses are introduced.
There are two levels of licenses under Location Services License, Base Location and Advanced Location.
Base Location License
The Base Location License is equivalent to the CAS license in the earlier software versions and is used for endpoint tracking. The license count is based on the number of APs supported.
Note: This is referred to as Location Services License in software release 7.4. In software release 7.5 and later, it is called the Base Location License.
The license format is L-LS-100AP. Here 'LS' refers to Location Services and '100AP' refers to 100 AP count."
I don´t understand why I see the 75% clients reached message.
The MSE is virtual and the installed version is 7.6.
The licenses are
L-MSE-7.0-K9
y 7 PRO-L-LS-100AP
Thanks in advance.
Regards.

Hi Scott,
Thanks for your previous answer.
I have a license for 700 APs (7 L-LS-100AP) and L-MSE-7.0-K9 license too.
In license Tab, I see this information too:
Service Platform Limit by AP Type Installed limit by AP License Type
CAS 2500 CAS Elements 700 Permanent
wIPS 6000 wIPS Monitor Mode APs 10 Evaluation wIPS Local Mode APs 10 (120 days left)
MC 2500 Mobile Concierge 10 Evaluation
(120 days left)
ANA 2500 Location Analytics 10 Evaluation
(120 days left)
I installed Cisco MSE Standard Virtual Appliance.
Now the number of registerd clients is 3000 or 4000 and 500 APs.
If Cisco says in its documentation:
*With software version 7.4 the licensing model has been changed from client-based to AP-based. The total clients supported on MSE has also been increased from 18,000 on MSE software release 7.3 to 25,000 on MSE software release 7.4. BL/AL refers to Base Location/Advanced Location.
Why do I see the message "License usage for Client Elements of the Context Aware Service has exceeded its threshold of 75% of the installed license count of 7000" if I have 4000 registered clients?
Could it be a bug?
Thanks in advance.
Regards.
-Ivan

MSE License

Hi
I am planning on installing CleanAir Wireless network, using WLC 5508, WCS(with plus license) and MSE.
Can somone explaine for me wich MSE license i need to get this to work ?
Regards
Erik

I'm going thru the same thing right now and this is a bit confusing. What I do know is that there are 2 types of licensing and depending on what it is you want to do you want one of the other or both. The licenses are explained below. I hope this helps.
Two types of Licenses:
•1.       wIPS – Adaptive Wireless Intrusion Prevention
•a.     Maintain a constant awareness of your RF environment to minimize legal liability, protect your brand reputation, and assure regulatory compliance.
•b.     Cisco Adaptive Wireless Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) offers advanced network security for dedicated monitoring and detection of wireless network anomalies, unauthorized access, and RF attacks. Fully integrated with the Cisco Unified Wireless Network, this solution delivers integrated visibility and control across the network, without the need for an overlay solution.
•2.       Context Aware – for locating wireless devices
•a.     With Context-Aware Software, organizations can quickly locate rogue devices, interferers, Wi-Fi clients, tagged assets, and wired devices. This physical location information provides the insight needed to improve workflow, quickly troubleshoot mobile clients, and implement asset management solutions.
Sandi

Uploading issues to other providers than .mac

has anyone had uploading issues to other providers than .mac??

can the names of the pages have spaces in them, or do
i have to change both the file name and the name of
the page?
As the note says, some servers will let you upload files with spaces in their names, and some will not. Names without spaces will always work.
In iWeb, the name you give to a site or page is the same as the name of the folder or file associated with it. So to avoid spaces in folder or file names, you need to omit them in the site and page names, or replace by hyphen or underscore.

LR 4/4.1RC and flickr uploading issues - resolved?

Have the uploading issues between LR 4/4.1RC and flickr been resolved? Waiting on upgrading from LR3, but the forum reports from unhappy flickr users wanting to "downgrade' are making me nervous. Should I wait, just upgrade to 4.0 and leave the RC alone for now?

An update ...
I have discovered that RC2 publishing does seem to be working (for me) but Flickr or LR seems to be objecting ("Invalid at the top level of the document") to specific images possibly relating to the contents of the caption field.
I narrowed down the failure to just one image ... removed its caption... it published, I put the caption back on - "Invalid ..." error came back.
FYI and not sure if relevant - I sometimes put http links in my caption fields.
I would have come back with a more comprehensive test, but it now appears that LR will not communicate with Flickr at all, now saying it cannot contact the Flickr service, so I cannot investigate further yet.
I know a little off the wall here ... but is it conceivable that Flickr itself has locked me out due to "erroneous" or suspicious content? I have never had problems with LR talking to Flickr before today and publishing to SmugMug is still working fine.

Adobe Connect pro 7.0 license upload

Hello,
I want to use Adobe conenct pro.
When I installing the software I have entered serial key(<<removed by moderator>>), afterwards
when I want to upload the license file has the following
error
(No message for validation error "format", type "id", field "field-id" )I added this error screen
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 25, 2011 1:11 PM

Hello ikarayaka,
I am running into the exactly same issue while uploading the Adobe Connect Enterprise Server (600) license. It would be great if you could share your experience and let us know what steps are required to have this issue resolved. I have already open a OSS message with SAP.
Regards,
- Furqan Illahi

Concurrent crystal license timeout Issue, need help.

Hi,
My company is using crystal enterprise 10 with 18 concurrent user license.
However, we often hit out of crystal license issues.
Does time to wait for exporting crystal reports to excel/pdf takes up licenses?
Does time to wait for crystal report to be printed or viewed on the web browser takes up licenses?
We all know that user sessions take up user licenses. 1 user login take up 1 license.
Does crystal pruning job takes up user licenses too?
Need help urgently, much appreciated.

Hi Daren,
Support on Cystal Enterprise 10 has expired. Make sure that your users are actually logging off and not just closing their browser.
One user can take up multiple licenses by not logging off or opening multiple browsers to view multiple reports. Scheduled jobs that are running do not take up license, but a user veiwing a historical instance does take up a license.
In your metrics tab in the Cyrsatl Management Console -> Servers-> cms you should be able to see the active number of sessions- system connections are backend connections between the servers and these do not take up any licenses.
Best Regards,
Jadie

Multiple cffile upload issues

Hello all. I'm having a little issue with a multiple upload I
am trying to achieve. I've been searching and searching but could
not find an answer, and maybe you guys could help me. Well I'm
doing multiple uploads on a form i created and it's uploading the
file and file name correctly, but it's inserting 6 records
everytime I'm hitting the submit button. Also, I've notice in my
database is when you click the submit button, it's inserting the
same file in one record 6 times, then it creates a new record and
inserts the second file 6 times. I'm going to post the code here,
maybe it's something I'm missing, not sure. Thanks for the help.

dame.cranon wrote:
> Hello all. I'm having a little issue with a multiple
upload I am trying to
> achieve. I've been searching and searching but could not
find an answer, and
> maybe you guys could help me. Well I'm doing multiple
uploads on a form i
> created and it's uploading the file and file name
correctly, but it's inserting
> 6 records everytime I'm hitting the submit button. Also,
I've notice in my
> database is when you click the submit button, it's
inserting the same file in
> one record 6 times, then it creates a new record and
inserts the second file 6
> times. I'm going to post the code here, maybe it's
something I'm missing, not
> sure. Thanks for the help.
>
>
>
> <cfloop index="i" from="1" to="6">
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.upload")>
>
> <cffile action="upload"
> destination="D:\Hosting\streetzmag\dev\crush_images\"
> filefield="pic#i#"
> nameconflict="makeunique"
> result="cffile.pic#i#"
> accept="image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/gif" >
>
> 
> <cfquery datasource="mysqlcf_streetzmag"
name="uploaded">
> INSERT INTO Information(firstname,
> lastname,
> email,
> contact_info,
> nickname,
> recent_work,
> hair_color,
> eye_color,
> ethnicity,
> age,
> height,
> measurements,
> pic_1,
> pic_2,
> pic_3,
> pic_4,
> pic_5,
> pic_6
>
>
> )
> VALUES('#FORM.firstname#',
> '#FORM.lastname#',
> '#FORM.email#',
> '#FORM.contact#',
> '#FORM.nickname#',
> '#FORM.work#',
> '#FORM.hair#',
> '#FORM.eye#',
> '#FORM.ethnic#',
> #FORM.age#,
> '#FORM.height#',
> '#FORM.measurements#',
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>,
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>,
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>,
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>,
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>,
>
> <cfif isDefined("form.pic#i#") and
evaluate("form.pic#i#") NEQ "">
> <cfqueryparam
value="#CFFILE['pic'&i].SERVERFILE#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"
> />
> <cfelse>
> NULL
> </cfif>
>
> )
> </cfquery>
> </cfif>
> </cfloop>
>
of course it will do everything 6 times since you have your
whole code
wrapped with cfloop from 1 to 6... so the code execution will
happen 6
times... plus your synatx for inserting filenames inside your
query
makes it insert same file 6 times (since the code is inside
one same
cfloop)...
you should separate your code and wrap only the cffile part
in a cfloop:
<cfif isDefined("form.upload")>
<cfloop index="i" from="1" to="6">
<cfif len(trim(form.pic#i#)) gt 0>
<cffile action="upload"
destination="D:\Hosting\streetzmag\dev\crush_images\"
filefield="pic#i#"
nameconflict="makeunique"
result="uploadedpic_#i#"
accept="image/jpeg, image/pjpeg, image/gif" >
</cfif>
</cfloop>

<cfquery datasource="mysqlcf_streetzmag"
name="uploaded">
INSERT INTO Information
(firstname,
lastname,
email,
contact_info,
nickname,
recent_work,
hair_color,
eye_color,
ethnicity,
age,
height,
measurements,
pic_1,
pic_2,
pic_3,
pic_4,
pic_5,
pic_6)
VALUES('#FORM.firstname#',
'#FORM.lastname#',
'#FORM.email#',
'#FORM.contact#',
'#FORM.nickname#',
'#FORM.work#',
'#FORM.hair#',
'#FORM.eye#',
'#FORM.ethnic#',
#FORM.age#,
'#FORM.height#',
'#FORM.measurements#',
<cfloop from="1" to="6" index="x">
<cfif isdefined("uploadedpic_#x#")>
<cfqueryparam value="#evaluate('uploadedpic_' & x)#"
cfsqltype="cf_sql_varchar"/>
<cfelse>
NULL
</cfif>
<cfif x lt 6>,</cfif>
</cfloop>)
</cfquery>
</cfif>
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com

APEX 3.1.2 Static File Upload Issues

We are still running on APEX 3.1.2 though we hope to go to 4 very soon.
We had a production problem this past week that is perplexing. I have seen other posts referencing similar issues but no solutions.
We have an application that has several Static File Javascripts (.js). We already ran into the IE Upload bug so we only upload in Mozilla now.
We had changes to one of the .js files (identity.js). I deleted the old file using the Shared Components screen and uploaded the new one. The action was "Successful" but the file was still the old version. We deleted a file of 73 lines of code and uploaded a new version of 28 lines. After successful upload, we still would get the 73 line version . The app was still getting that version too.
I deleted it many times and tried again. I ran scripts to do both the delete and upload. I even deleted the file manually from the FLOWS_FILES table that held it. Still got the old version.
We bounced the server (thinking it was cached somewhere) - still got the old version. Finally, in desperation, I started cloning the app to another app number in another Workspace. Since we use aliases, I thought I could use a clean Workspace and uplad the new file there. This worked but - suddenly the old Workspace started using the correct file.
Is ther some secret cache somewhere that needs to be cleared out? I did not want to start randomly clearing out caches and there is no documentation on this issue.
Is it something about our config - we have Oracle HTTP Server, OC4J, and modplsql for this environment with a 10g database.
Any insight would be appreciated - my manager does not like "it fixed itself magically".

We ruled out the browser caching by trying the app on several other people's PCs.
I am thinking it is being cached somewhere in the APEX server environment but cannot find any documentation on where or what that might be.
I think I might have triggered a refresh when I was trying to implement a cloned version (in a different Workspace). It seems that the scope of a JS file is within its Workspace so we figured that a new Workspace would treat the changed file as a new file - and it did. During this process, we had duplicate ALIAS for a minute and I think that confused the APEX App Engine and triggered the refresh.
But that is a SWAG opinion.
I also thought of "versioning" the JS files but our developers are not too keen. If we don't find another solution, that may be what we have to do.

File Upload issue in MVC

Hi,
For my MVC application, I have created a main controller.
On the DO_REQUEST of the main controller, I am setting the sub controllers, and directly calling that controller using create_controller, controller_set_active, and call_controller.
I included dispatch_input( ) in the Main controller's DO_REQUEST method.
Inside the DO_REQUEST of the sub controller, I am creating a view using create_view and call_view methods.
In this view, I have a <htmlb:tableView /> and a <htmlb:fileUpload />, with a button. The issue is that, when the button is clicked, in the DO_HANDLE_EVENT method of the sub-controller, I am not getting the File Data, or the table data.
For File upload, I use the following -
data lv_fupld_data TYPE REF TO cl_htmlb_fileupload.
lv_fupld_data ?= cl_htmlb_manager=>get_data(
                      request = runtime->server->request
                      name    = 'fileupload'
                      id      = 'fupld_1').
I have the <htmlb:form method       = "post"
                  encodingType = "multipart/form-data" > etc in the view.
When I call this sub-controller directly from the browser (after including the dispatch_input( ) part in DO_REQUEST), I do not get any issue. I am able to read the file data and upload the file.
Any Idea why this is happening?

Hi Rakesh,
I think I got your problem:
You only have the htmlb:form in your view of the subcontroller, and not in the main view.
Therefore the subcontroller works by itself, but not within the main controller.
If you are including subcontrollers, then make sure the form element is only present in the view of the main controller, wrapping around any subcontroller calls. And don't use the form tag anymore in the subcontrollers.
Just as you put dispatch_input() just in your top controller, also place htmlb:form only in your top view.
Regards,
Max

ISE 1.2/1.2.1 license consumption issues

Hi all, I know this topic is somewhat done to death but I want to know whether anyone else is experiencing this issue. In summary my ISE deployment (right this minute) has 17 Active sessions with 17 base and 17 plus licenses consumed. My issue with this is that of the 17 active sessions only 8 of these sessions are utilising a plus feature ie the registration status in the authorisation policy. In short at all times the plus license consumption always matches the base license consumption.
I have continually had this issue with all ISE deployments whereby the license consumption does not reflect Cisco documentation and my configurations. Without giving screenshots I can say with certainty that the only plus feature been used is the BYOD onboarding and subsequent registration status in the authz policy. The rest of my policies are straight forward CWA guest and EAP-TLS machine cert authorisations with no profiling information used in the policy. I have gone so far as to turn off profiling and removing BYOD policies with the same results.
The following document clearly states what should and shouldn't consume a license:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/security/identity-services-engine/datasheet-c78-730772.pdf
Any input would be appreciated.

The bug is listed as fixed, but I don't see which software it is fixed in. I must admit I've seen this problem for months, probably over a year now. It was already the case on 1.1.4 at least. I have some customers using 1300 of 500 advanced licenses.
It would be nice if it functioned exactly as the documentation always said. It would give you a warm feeling that things will keep working when the advanced license expires entirely (I'm sure we'll find out soon).
At one point I was told it was under discussion whether to fix the problem, or to fix the documentation to fit the problem, but last I heard it would be fixed at some point in the future. Every time we get a call regarding new software (1.2.1, 1.3) I make sure I ask them that the trust based licensing continues. We're OK as long as trust based licensing continues, but it's scruffy and hard to explain to customers why it shows 3 times as many advanced users as they already have. And then on occasions you see their eyes light up when they realise they can run 3000 advanced and Cisco will be none the wiser, or alternatively that they could have got away with a 100 user license and you've just cost them a 5000 user license that nobody can tell if they are using or not.

Lock Box Uploading Issue

Hi,
When i upload BAI file into Lock Box...I am getting the below error in FBL2 transaction.
Accounts receivable posting Error: (F5 102) Customer * is not defined in company code 1000
After that when i see in to FBL1,I am getting the below error.
Payment Advise item doesnot exist
Payment advice 010000007500001 does not exist for account 9372 1000
Message no. FA006
Kindly help me what is the problem and why i am not able to upload it successfully?
Thanks
Kishore

I am experiencing the same issue.
I am wondering how you went about in correcting this issue
Thanks

MSE-license uploading issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for