Multi Message Mapping without BPM: Limitaions

Hi Crew,
I have done this one(without BPM)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
I understood that there cannot be multiple receiver services.
This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.
Am I right?
Are there anymore limitations than this?
Regards,
Karthik kaveriselvan.

<i>select multiple receivers using the + button.</i>
one sender service.
two receiver service referring to one target interface each with one communicaiton channel each.
Two interface determination for two business services and they both are refering to the same enhanced interface mapping.
Created receiver determination and added the two receiver service to it, but when looking at the configuration overview for receiver determinaiton, for each service, both the target interfaces used in interface mapping are listed and the reciever determination shows "Does not exist".
When I run the scenario, I get "No receiver agreement found" error.
Please calrify how many receiver agreements have to be configured and how?
Thanks
karthik

Similar Messages

  • 1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error

    Hi,
    I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
    Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
    I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
    To acheive this,
    In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
    And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
    When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
    Please let me know how can I resolve it.

    Oops, I did not know that.
    Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
    But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
      <ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
    In MM, I see the output message as follows:
    Message
         Message1
             MT_2OP_File_Out
                  Employee
                      Name
                      Age
         Message2
             MT_2OP_File_Out1
                  Employee1
                      Name
                      Age
    The mapping done:
    MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
    Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
         Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
         Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
    The fields are straight maps.
    Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help.

  • Multi-Message Mapping based on value of field - (Without BPM)

    Hi.
    I am having a bit of difficulty with multi-message mapping without BPM. I want to map to message1 & message2 based on a field in the rows of the source structure.
    e.g.
    row1-Source-Field1=> (if equal 0)   => <b>Message1</b>-field1.
    row2-Source-Field1=> (if equal 10) => <b>Message2</b>-field1.
    To attempt to do this, I use the conditions in the graphical mapper:
    if row-Source-Field1 = 0   => Map "Row to MessageType1".
    if row-Source-Field1 = 10 => Map "Row to MessageType2".
    However when I test this the mapping only seems to consider the first row value in row-Source-Field1 and ignores the fact that row two has a value of 10. I think this has something to do with contexts etc..
    I would appreciate any help please.
    Regards.
    Mick.

    in that case try this out
    row1-source-field1 (remove context) -- UDF -splitbyvalue-target
    UDF1(for message 1)
    for(int i=0;i<field1.length;i++)
    if(field1<i>.equals("0"))
    result.addValue(<field to be mapped><i>);
    UDF2(for message 2)
    for(int i=0;i<field1.length;i++)
    if(field1<i>.equals("10"))
    result.addValue(<field to be mapped><i>);

  • Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

    Hi Experts,
    I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
    for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
    This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
    The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
    IN ESR
    IN ID
    IN SXMB_MONI of PI
    IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
    due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
    please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
    please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Jagesh

    Hi Nunu,
    Check the below blog for restrictions.
    Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
    Restrictions
    Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
    Regards,
    Praveen.

  • Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

    Hi frnds,
    I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
    But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
    I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
    So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
    Thanks and regards.
    Neetesh

    Hi Neetesh,
    <i>
    When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"</i>
    For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
    If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
    Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    Regards,
    Abhy

  • Multi-Mapping without BPM

    Hi ,
    I am following this weblog
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
    Please check this for your clarification
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11212307@N08/1135395357/
    Thanks
    dushanth

    ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
    Regards
    Sreeram.G.Reddy

  • Message Split without BPM - Error

    Hi,
    I am creating a message split scenario without BPM as per weblog <a href="/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible Split without BPM</a>
    I am able to receive message in XI but after that it shows error in Integration engine.
    Error Category : MAPPING
    Error Code : GENERIC
    I am able to see the message in SXMB_MONI with error
    <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>No messages created from split mapping</SAP:P1>
    Please advice.
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Hi Venkat,
    I am not able to see sub-groupid in sxmb_moni.
    Please see below the contents from sxmb_moni trace.
    ============================
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: sender</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender scheme external = XIParty</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender agency external = http://sap.com/xi/XI</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Sender party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Party normalization: receiver</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver scheme external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver agency external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party external =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver party normalized =</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_HTTP_HANDLER-HANDLE_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB was called with URL /sap/xi/engine?type=entry</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is done by XMB !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = 67F58830CE9E11DA91CD00111120E6DB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0002</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
    - <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO6___0000</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = QN7</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">client = 100</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">user = XIAFUSER</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2006-04-18T05:51:20Z CET</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">----
    </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:29EB87F0231C357A8336DDEBD574EEAB</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:0CF1E1E0C5FC11DABCB9E4A50A07012B</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_filesplit_without_bpm_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
      <Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--  ************************************
      -->
      </SAP:Trace>
    Thanks,
    Sri.

  • 1:N mapping without BPM ( Idoc Receiver)

    Hi,
    I have a scenario like 1:N, source would be JMS and the receiver side have two Idocs with the same business system. based on one Item segment value, I need to route the input JMS message to corresponding receiver IDoc.
    INput Structure:
    Record
    Header 1..1
    H1
    H2
    H3
    Item 1..Unbounded
    I1
    I2
    I3
    NOte: Based on value I2, I need to route the message to corresponding receiver Idoc. like If I2=A then Idoc1 and I2=B then Idoc2. Can we achieve the same without using BPM?
    -Esha

    Hi,
    This can be achieved with Interface Determination conditions. Go for 2 mapping. And in Interface Determination put condition to check which mapping to use. No need of ccBPM.
    If you still want to go for 1:N multimapping please refer link:
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    without BPM.
    Regards,
    Vineetha.
    Edited by: Vineetha on Apr 27, 2010 11:44 AM

  • 1:N Mapping without BPM - Inbound Structure

    Hello,
    I know that a 1:N Mapping without BPM should be possible with newer releases. I tried to do so and set the occurences in the signature tab of message mapping to 1:N.
    However the problem I am facing right now is that a new <Messages> element is wrapped around the source structure. So the incoming message is not valid anymore and therefore the target structure is empty. How should this be handled? Does the source system need to add a new <messages> root element or is ccBPM not avoidable in my case?
    Thank you!

    Hi Guppenberger,
    I understand your doing 1:N mapping without BPM.
    There is no need to added the message wrapper when you are testing your scenario end to end. But if you are testing your message mapping alone, wrapper is required in test tab of Message Mapping. Please refer this blow [Link|/people/ranga.rajan2/blog/2010/03/17/multi-mapping-with-a-simple-scenario--fledgling-kit ], have a look at payload screenshot. I suggest you to check you payload (for end to end testing) and mapping logic again.
    Regards,
    Raghu_Vamsee

  • The N:M message spliting without BPM in PI7.1   ???

    Hi,experts
    I'm doing an scenario which implements the N:M messages split without BPM...
    The data type structure as below:
    ================================
    SOURCE_TEST     
        A                             0...1
        B                             0...1
        C                             0...1
        D                             0...1
        E                             0...1
    ================================
    TARGET1_TEST        
        F                             0...1
        G                            0...1
    ================================
    TARGET2_TEST        
        H                            0...1
        I                              0...1
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Now i want to split msgs and do the mapping as A-->F,B--->G and D>H,E--
    >I which depends on the C value,,
    for instance,if C="1" then generate TARGET1_TEST,if C="2" then generate TARGET2_TEST
    and i changed the signature tab,set the occurence of SOURCE_TEST 0....unbounded, 
    added the two target msg type into the Target messages and also set the occurence of them 0...unbounded.
    Then did the mapping(the mapping implemented no problem,it's sure)
    after did the operation mapping,do the ID objects as below:
    one sender bussiness component,one sender communication channel,one interface determination,one receiver determination,one send agreement,one receive business component,two receiver communication channel,two receiver agreements
    the issue now is when i do the " test configuration" in ID,it pops up "Runtime error  Split mapping created no messages"
    but i go to check the operation mapping and cannot find any issue in it coz it's as fine as message mapping
    could anybody shed some lights on it?
    Thanks in adv.
    Regards.

    oh....is it really we cannot implement it without BPM or just you havn't do that?i just saw a blog written about 1:N without BPM and it's said we can do N:M similarly,so i want to have a try,now it pops up the errors as below:
    Runtime error
    Split mapping created no messages
    <Trace level="1" type="B">CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">......attachment XI_Context not found </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Mapping already defined in interface determination </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Object ID of Interface Mapping 97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Version ID of Interface Mapping 6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Object-Id:97B524981FD63207AA98CA34BF326F12 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:6712C511963511DEAEAAF2F4AC197482 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Step:1 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA_JDK </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">MTOM attachments are written to the payload </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Dynamic Configuration Is Empty </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Executing multi-mapping </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerLibsList </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList.class (http://infosys.com/pi/projects/sysco/n2, -1) in swcv 6712c511-9635-11de-aeaa-f2f4ac197482. </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_$MT$InnerParamsList </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** START APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document start </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns0=&quot;http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message1] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message2] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Messages] </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Document end </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T"> *** END APPLICATION TRACE *** </Trace> <Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._TEST_MM_N2M_NOBPM_). </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 1 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 2 Number of Messages 0 </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

  • N:1 mapping without BPM

    Hi All,
    Is it possible to do N:1 mapping without BPM in PI 7.1 ?
    Thanks and regards
    Uma

    Hi,
    >Yeah, It is possible.
    how can it be possible based on ANY requirement ?
    you just cannot receive many messages into PI and bundle them into
    one without BPM - and this is final
    can you tell the way if you know how to do it without a BPM
    in any (even very specific) scenario ?
    thanks,
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • 1:n mapping without BPM

    Hello Friends,
    I need some help about this mapping issue.
    input file :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>12222333444</ID>
                   <points>50</points>
              </Object_1>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>12222333555</ID>
                   <points>20</points>
              </Object_1>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>1222233777</ID>
                   <points>10</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file1 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>12222333444</ID>
                   <points>50</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file 2 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>12222333555</ID>
                   <points>20</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file 3 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>1222233777</ID>
                   <points>10</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    Best regards,
    FK

    I think you have not followed the blog properly for your requirement.
    for example: Source File is like this.
    <Records>
      <FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
      <LastName>Singh</LastName>
      <Dept>SAP</Dept>
      <EmpID>12345</EmpID>
      <Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
      <Experience>5 years</Experience>
    </Records>
    'N' Target Structure are
    <Records>
      <EmpName>
               <FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
               <LastName>Singh</LastName>
      </EmpName>
    </Records>
    <Records>
      <EmpDetail>
             <Dept>SAP</Dept>
             <EmpID>12345</EmpID>
             <Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
             <Experience>5 years</Experience>
      <EmpDetail>
    </Records>
    So if you think your requirement is as per the above examples then follow /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible blog.
    Regards,
    Sarvesh

  • Error in Multi Message Mapping

    Hi,
    I am getting the following error in my multi message mapping scenario where I am trying to create 2 different output files from a single input file based on some condition. I tested the message mapping by using a test file and it works fine, but when I use the same file and test it end to end the scenario is failing with the following error.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--
    Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Is there something wrong with my configuration?
    The trace has the following content.
    Trace level="1" type="T">*** START APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Document start</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Messages]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Add raw attribute [ xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge"]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message1]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message1]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Start tag [ns0:Message2]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Message2]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Close tag [ns0:Messages]</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Document end</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">*** END APPLICATION TRACE ***</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_Employee1_MT_To_Employee1_MT_AND_Employee2_MT_MM_ completed. (executeStep() of com.sap.xi.tf._Employee1_MT_To_Employee1_MT_AND_Employee2_MT_MM_).</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 1 Number of Messages 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message Type 2 Number of Messages 0</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_MAPPING~ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
      </Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
    - <!--
      -->
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Persisting message Status = 014</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Message version 001</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
      </SAP:Trace>

    Hi,
    The scenario I am trying to test is a multi mapping scenario where I am trying to split one source message and create two target messages by using two different receiver interfaces, one for each message.
    I am on PI 7.1 and when I test message mapping and operation mapping using the payload from SXMB_MONI, it is successful. Whereas when I test the scenario end to end I am getting the following error messages:
    Operation Mapping
    Employee_Out_SI_To_Employee1_In_SI_AND_Employee2_In_SI_OM
    Name
    Employee_Out_SI_To_Employee1_In_SI_AND_Employee2_In_SI_OM
    Namespace
    http://accenture.com/1:N_multi-mapping
    Runtime error
    Split mapping created no messages
    Start tag ns0:Messages Add raw attribute xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge" Start tag ns0:Message1 Close tag ns0:Message1 Start tag ns0:Message2 Close tag ns0:Message2 Close tag ns0:Messages
    Could someone please help
    Cheers,
    S

  • Different options for message mapping in BPM

    Hey guys
    i m in the learning phase of BPM and am kinda confused with the different ways we can do message mapping in a BPM scenario.
    first of all we can do message mapping before BPM,we can also do after BPM and lastly we can do inside BPM(ofcurse this is not recommended as its too resource consuming)
    i have bene through starters blog on BPM by Krishna moorthy and Arpit seth,and now am wondering how to use the mapping in diff. ways
    suppose i m doing a simple File to File with BPM(just for practise purpose)
    now here is what i have designed in IR
    DT_sender_File                                       DT_receiver_File
    MT_sender_File                                       MT_receiver_File
    MI_Outbound_sender(async,outbound),     MI_Inbound_receiver(async,inbound)
    AI_sender(abstract,async)                        AI_receiver(abstract,async)
    MM_File_File(using MT_sender_File and MT_receiver_File)
    now i want to clear some doubts about interface mapping.my understanding is
    if i do interface mapping between MI_Outbound_sender and AI_receiver,this will be interface mapping before BPM.
    if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and MI_Inbound_receiver,this will be interafce mapping after BPM
    and if i do interface mapping between AI_sender and AI_receiver then it will be mapping inside BPM.
    is my understanding correct?if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario.(if we dont consider the performance issue as of now)
    thanx
    saif

    Hi Saif,
    <i>
    is my understanding correct?</i>
    Yes, thts correct
    <i>if yes,then does that means we can we any of the above mapping in our scenario</i>
    Of course, u can use any of them (overlooking the performance issue)
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Message Mapping outside BPM

    I often see a point from XI-Legends that a Message Mapping should be executed out side the BPM and that will make the XI performance good.
    How to do a Message Mapping outside BPM? What does it mean?
    Any Blog that narrates the above situation?
    Thanks.

    Data Types
    Source/Sender Data Format ---     DT_Sender File     
    Target/Receiver Data Format --     DT_Receiver
    Message Types
    Sender Message Type -  MT_SenderFile
    Receiver Message Type - MT_ReceiverFile
    Message Interface
    MI_OB_Sender(Async, Outbound)            MI_IB_Receiver(Asynch,Inbound)
    AI_Sender(Async, Abstract)                    AI_Receiver(Async,Abstract)
    So
    if the mappaing is done between
    MI_OB_Sender       To   AI_Receiver           (Its Before BPM)
    AI_Sender              To   MI_IB_Receiver      (Its After BPM)
    AI_Sender              to  AI_Receiver            (Its inside BPM)
    Whether my understanding is correct? Thanks for your patience.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Photoshop Camera Raw 6.7-Update Installation failed

    Photoshop Camera Raw 6.7-Update Installation failes. System information: Adobe Photoshop Version: 12.0.4 (12.0.4x20110407 [20110407.r.1265 2011/04/07:02:00:00 cutoff; r branch]) x32 Operating system: Windows XP 32-Bit Version: 5.1 Service Pack 3 Regi

  • Unable to call a procedure in Page

    Hi Experts, I have below in CO if ("WaiveItem".equals(pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM))) String vHeaderID = pageContext.getParameter("vTraHeaderId"); pageContext.putTransactionValue("vTraHeaderId", vHeaderID); String vTempID = pageContext.getPar

  • I cant re-start sql server (2008 developer) on win 7 workstation after enabling tcpIP -- been running fine for a year

    I had successfully installed sql server 2008 Developer edition on a win7 pro workstation about a year ago.  I has been running fine for the last year (locally and running .Net 4.5 framework).  All services (RS, Analysis) running fine.   Then today so

  • Audio sync drifting

    Log and capture files start out in sync and drift out of sync over the length of the clip. Could dissimilar Sequence, capture and device control presets cause this problem? Seq Preset is set to DV50 48 Khz which has 16 bit 48 Khz audio Capture Preset

  • Fixed Assets Very Slow

    Hi All, Our client is running SBO 2007A and has Fixed Assets installed. I can connect remotely to the server and the speed is absolutely fine for Fixed Assets.  This is using the administrator network logon and the SBO manager logon. When the custome