Multiple client receivers
Hi Experts,
I have a requirement where the SENDER is SOAP and the receiver is RFC.
Sender send the data and it should be bifurcated to 6 clients based on some condition.
Previously I have created a rule in receiver determination to send the date to multiple receivers which are existed in the same client.
But now here they want to send the data to multiple client receivers based on the condition.
Do I need to create the CC and receiver agreement for each receiver or is there any other option available ?
Please help me out with this.
thanks and regards,
praveen
Hi praveen,
Yes. You can handle this in the same way by creating the condition in Receiver determination.
But here you need to create separate Interface determination and receiver agreement for each receiver. You can use existing RFC Communication channel in Receiver agreement.
Regards
Baskaran K
Similar Messages
-
HI All,
Can any one tell me how to send i-docs to different clients. My requirement is, i am generating i-doc in 200 client. here i can give only one port, i have no option to give multiple clients. But i need to send it to clients 201, 202, 203. in this scenario how i can send the same I-doc to different clients, with out regenerating it.
Regares,
Suresh Patipati.How are you generating the IDOC? Your distribution model maintains the receivers (logical systems) for a given message type. You can maintain as many receivers (clients) as you like in the model and distribute based on that. Each logical system has a port in the partner profile, but that's not related to runtime distribution, except when it's time to push that message to the receiver.
-
Accessing the same stateful session bean from multiple clients in a clustered environment
I am trying to access the same stateful session bean from multiple
clients. I also want this bean to have failover support so we want to
deploy it in a cluster. The following description is how we have tried
to solve this problem, but it does not seem to be working. Any
insight would be greatly appreciated!
I have set up a cluster of three servers. I deployed a stateful
session bean with in memory replication across the cluster. A client
obtains a reference to an instance of one of these beans to handle a
request. Subsequent requests will have to use the same bean and could
come from various clients. So after using the bean the first client
stores the handle to the bean (actually the replica aware stub) to be
used by other clients to be able to obtain the bean. When another
client retrieves the handle gets the replica aware stub and makes a
call to the bean the request seems to unpredictably go to any of the
three servers rather than the primary server hosting that bean. If the
call goes to the primary server everything seems to work fine the
session data is available and it gets backed up on the secondary
server. If it happens to go to the secondary server a bean that has
the correct session data services the request but gives the error
<Failed to update the secondary copy of a stateful session bean from
home:ejb20-statefulSession-TraderHome>. Then any subsequent requests
to the primary server will not reflect changes made on the secondary
and vice versa. If the request happens to go to the third server that
is not hosting an instance of that bean then the client receives an
error that the bean was not available. From my understanding I thought
the replica aware stub would know which server is the primary host for
that bean and send the request there.
Thanks in advance,
Justin
If 'allow-concurrent-call' does exactly what you need, then you don't have a problem,
do you?
Except of course if you switch ejb containers. Oh well.
Mike
"FBenvadi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I've got the same problem.
>I understand from you that concurrent access to a stateful session bean
>is
>not allowed but there is a
>token is weblogic-ejb-jar.xml that is called 'allow-concurrent-call'
>that
>does exactly what I need.
>What you mean 'you'll get a surprise when you go to production' ?
>I need to understand becouse I can still change the design.
>Thanks Francesco
>[email protected]
>
>"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Get the fix immediately from BEA and test it. It would be a shame to
>wait
>until
>> December only to get a fix - that doesn't work.
>>
>> As for stateful session bean use - just remember that concurrent access
>to
>a stateful
>> session bean is not allowed. Things will work fine until you go to
>production
>> and encounter some real load - then you will get a surprise.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> [email protected] (Justin Meyer) wrote:
>> >I just heard back from WebLogic Tech Support and they have confirmed
>> >that this is a bug. Here is their reply:
>> >
>> >There is some problem in failover of stateful session beans when its
>> >run from a java client.However, it is fixed now.
>> >
>> >The fix will be in SP2 which will be out by december.
>> >
>> >
>> >Mike,
>> >Thanks for your reply. I do infact believe we are correctly using
>a
>> >stateful session bean however it may have been misleading from my
>> >description of the problem. We are not accessing the bean
>> >concurrently from 2 different clients. The second client will only
>> >come into play if the first client fails. In this case we want to
>be
>> >able to reacquire the handle to our stateful session bean and call
>it
>> >from the secondary client.
>> >
>> >
>> >Justin
>> >
>> >"Mike Reiche" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:<[email protected]>...
>> >> You should be using an entity bean, not a stateful session bean
>for
>> >this application.
>> >>
>> >> A stateful session bean is intended to be keep state (stateful)
>for
>> >the duration
>> >> of a client's session (session).
>> >>
>> >> It is not meant to be shared by different clients - in fact, if
>you
>> >attempt to
>> >> access the same stateful session bean concurrently - it will throw
>> >an exception.
>> >>
>> >> We did your little trick (storing/retrieving handle) with a stateful
>> >session bean
>> >> on WLS 5.1 - and it did work properly - not as you describe. Our
>sfsb's
>> >were not
>> >> replicated as yours are.
>> >>
>> >> Mike
>> >>
>> >> [email protected] (Justin Meyer) wrote:
>> >> >I am trying to access the same stateful session bean from multiple
>> >> >clients. I also want this bean to have failover support so we want
>> >to
>> >> >deploy it in a cluster. The following description is how we have
>tried
>> >> >to solve this problem, but it does not seem to be working. Any
>> >> >insight would be greatly appreciated!
>> >> >
>> >> >I have set up a cluster of three servers. I deployed a stateful
>> >> >session bean with in memory replication across the cluster. A client
>> >> >obtains a reference to an instance of one of these beans to handle
>> >a
>> >> >request. Subsequent requests will have to use the same bean and
>could
>> >> >come from various clients. So after using the bean the first client
>> >> >stores the handle to the bean (actually the replica aware stub)
>to
>> >be
>> >> >used by other clients to be able to obtain the bean. When another
>> >> >client retrieves the handle gets the replica aware stub and makes
>> >a
>> >> >call to the bean the request seems to unpredictably go to any of
>the
>> >> >three servers rather than the primary server hosting that bean.
>If
>> >the
>> >> >call goes to the primary server everything seems to work fine the
>> >> >session data is available and it gets backed up on the secondary
>> >> >server. If it happens to go to the secondary server a bean that
>has
>> >> >the correct session data services the request but gives the error
>> >> ><Failed to update the secondary copy of a stateful session bean
>from
>> >> >home:ejb20-statefulSession-TraderHome>. Then any subsequent requests
>> >> >to the primary server will not reflect changes made on the secondary
>> >> >and vice versa. If the request happens to go to the third server
>that
>> >> >is not hosting an instance of that bean then the client receives
>an
>> >> >error that the bean was not available. From my understanding I
>thought
>> >> >the replica aware stub would know which server is the primary host
>> >for
>> >> >that bean and send the request there.
>> >> >
>> >> >Thanks in advance,
>> >> >Justin
>>
>
>
-
Hello All,
we have created shared folder on multiple client machine in domain environment on different 2 OS like-XP,Vista, etc.
from some day's When we facing problem when we are access from host name that shared folder is accessible but same time same computer when we are trying to access the share folder with IP it asking for credentials i have type again and again
correct credential but unable to access that. If i re-share the folder then we are access it but when we are restarted the system then same problem is occurring.
I have checked IP,DNS,Gateway and more each & everything is well.
Pls suggest us.
Pankaj KumarHi,
According to your description, my understanding is that the same shared folder can be accessed by name, but can’t be accessed be IP address and asks for credentials.
Please try to enable the option below on the device which has shared folder:
Besides, check the Advanced Shring settings of shared folder and confrim that if there is any limitation settings.
Best Regards,
Eve Wang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected] -
WDS 2012 R2 - Cannot PXE multiple clients at the same time
Hello All,
This is my first post on here so I apologize if this is the wrong place. I work for a school district and we are implementing WDS 2012 R2. We've been extremely satisfied with the speeds and ease of use through unattend files. However, for
the past month I've been looking for a possible answer to a problem that has plagued us from day one of implementation.
So here's the problem:
I have a stand alone WDS server which is not a domain controller and is not our DHCP server. I have IP helpers and broadcast forwarders setup on the network. As well as option 66 and 67 in DHCP. So far so good right!
Well that's partially right. When we boot one client at a time to the WDS server. Everything works as intended. We can TFTP the necessary files from the WDS server. Everything boots up and we're off and running.
However, if we boot up two or more clients at the same time. The WDS server never responds to the traffic. The clients get their DHCP information. They start the referral and download from the WDS server, but get no response. I'm
really hoping that someone on here would have some insight of something I can try. I've about exhausted my list of peers and contacts. They're all stumped as well and were smart enough to stay with 2008 WDS.
I would prefer to stick with 2012 R2 since it's setup and working for the most part. With only this one hiccup.
Thanks in advance for any guidance!Hello Daniel,
I appreciate the reply and apologize for taking so long to get back to this. Things have been a little hectic over here.
I have tried everything on this forum and I am still unsuccessful in PXE booting multiple clients at the same time.
Multicast is enabled on the server, and it works for the clients. However, as stated in the original post. I cannot boot multiple machines at the same time. I can start them from the image selection screen around the same time though. So,
that appears to be working fine. -
How to use multiple clients within JCO?
Hi,
I'm pretty new to configuring Web Dynpro's with it's JCO connections. I have the following question.
We are using one portal (SAP EP 6.0_640 SP15) and one R/3 system (SAP ECC 5.0) with multiple clients (multiple customers who are all using the same portal).
Do I have to deploy a web dynpro for each client and maintain it's JCO connection for each client?
Or is there another way how I can set this up?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Dave ArendsHi Dave,
<b><i>Do I have to deploy a web dynpro for each client and maintain it's JCO connection for each client?
Or is there another way how I can set this up?</i></b>
You dont need to deploy a web dynpro for each client . You can use same JCO connection for multiple User ID's ( multiple Clients mean multiple user ID's on the same portal ).
If this is the case then single JCo connection is enough to pull data from R/3 and show on portal page .
Thanks,
Nanda -
How to control one server with multiple clients via TCP/IP
I am wanting to control a single server with multiple clients. Only one client would be active at a time, so there would be no conflict. I want to use TCP/IP. So far, I have programmed a cluster that passes data back to the server with no problems. The challenge come in when a second client is added to the mix. I have't been able to figure out how to turn each client on and send the appropriate data and then turn it off so it doesn't keep sending the same data to the server.
Here are the things that I have considered and did some preliminary testing, but don't really know how to impliment:
1. Send a numeric on the front of the cluster packet that tells the server that data is on the way.
2. Send a boolean on the front of the cluster packet to somehow turn the server TCP/IP on.
The problem I have found is that LabVIEW TCP/IP doesn't like to be turned on and off. If it doesn't get the data it expects, it goes into a reset mode and that kills the response time.
Any help?You should consider implementing a set of simple one-byte commands that can be sent back and forth between the Server and the Clients. You can base all of these ideas off the example in the Example Finder under Networking >> TCP and UDP called Multiple Connections - Server.
You will have two loops in the server VI: one to wait for new connections, and one to send and receive data from the existing connections. For instance, after one of the clients connects, it can request control of the server to send data to it by sending the character "R" for request. Every time the send/receive loop of the Server executes, the first thing it can do is to check all the existing connections to see if any of the clients have sent a control request ("R"). If so, it will create a buffer (array) of control requests. This could be in the form of Connection IDs or indexes in the array for a particular Connection ID. Your choice.
After the Server receives a request for contol, if it is not already under control by another client, then it can send a response to the first client on the control request list. For instance, the server could send the first client a "S" command for send. Note that after the clients send their control request, they should execute a TCP Read and wait indefinitely for the server to respond with the one-byte "S" command. Then, once the client in control is finished sending data to the server, it could send the character "X" telling the Server to release it from control.
The example I mentioned above already does a similar thing. Note how when a client wants to disconnect, they send the letter "Q". You can see this in the Multiple Connections - Client VI. The Server then checks each individual connection to see if it's received this one-byte command, and if it has, it closes the connection to the client. This is what you would want to implement, but instead of having just one command, you'll have to distinguish between a few and build up a buffer of control requests.
Finally, if a client does decide to disconnect in your application, they could send the command "Q" just like the example above. At this point, close the connection and remove that Connection ID from the array of connections. You will also have to handle the case that this client was in the request control waiting line when it disconnected, in which case you need to delete it from that array as well.
This will definitely work for you, but it will take some work. Best of luck!
Jarrod S.
National Instruments -
We have a product which is a custom application based on SharePoint Foundation 2010. Right now, for each of our client we create a dedicated server and host the application in the standalone deployment. Now, the requirement is to host multiple clients in a
farm deployment.
Challenges are: 1. The product has same name for the wsp that is deployed on different client servers as of now. How to distinguish for different clients on same farm
Currently the product specific css and jquery is in 14 hive. These files will be of difefrent versions for different client. How to segregate that?
How many web applications is recommend to be created in a single SPF 2010 farm? What are the challenges?
There are a couple of DBs created in SQL for the application. What is the best way to separate those for the client?
Essentially its the same product but with different versions for each client that we want to deploy in a single farm. What is the best practice to tackle this?For the most part, these are not SharePoint questions per se, but product-specific questions you'd better ask the vendor about. To get in some more detail:
1. It totally depends on the scope of the solution. If its global, then you're out of luck and any changes you make affect all instances that use it. Better ask the vendor about it.
2. Not that many, let's say < 10, assuming you're web applications have separate application pools. Check out http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262787(v=office.14).aspx#WebApplication for
more info.
3. This is very application specific and really should be answered by the vendor. Not related to SharePoint at all.
4. Again, really depends on the product so better ask the vendor.
Good luck!
Kind regards,
Margriet Bruggeman
Lois & Clark IT Services
web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com -
Is it possbile to have multiple clients on our Production instance
We have our Production system with client 101
Our abapers want me to create another client 500 (config only - not easy to accomplish) to be used for our Mexican users.
I told them to create another company code for Mexico, but they do not know how to do this.
DO I have any other options, of yes
Pros and cons of having multiple clients in same production instance.
I know that any independent code is going to effect all clients.
THanks
JoeHi Jo,
you CAN create a new client, but mostly this is not done, because the effort to maintain multiple clients is mostly higher than just different company codes. Yes, ABAPs are client indpendent and therefore valid for all clients.
So, the argument, to "not know" how to create different company codes is not valid to me !
Regards
Volker Gueldenpfennig, consolut international ag
http://www.consolut.de - http://www.4soi.de - http://www.easymarketplace.de -
Saving string from multiple clients on a server data structue
I have a server which receives updates from multiple clients ( in this example, football scores which are updated periodically by the clients.)
When the server receives the scores it needs to store them and at certain time intervals send the complete list of scores to multiple terminals at various locations.
I am approaching this task in stages...
stage 1.
..create the clients and server ...test the clients can send the data and the server can receive the data and output to screen..
this is completed
stage 2...
a/ on the server side store the received scores in a data structure (ArrayList<String> is what I'm thinking.)
b/ periodically output all scores to the screen (maybe every 30 seconds) and empty the ArrayList..am looking at the Timer class for this part..
stage 3
create the monitors and output scores to monitors periodically..
======================================================
right now I'm at stage 2a ie trying to store the received scores in a data structure.
i've created a method saveScore in the StoreScore class which is called by the StoreScore run method...
The saveScore method creates an ArrayList and adds the score to it...
Question
does every thread create a new instance of storedScores and therefore the scores are stored in a multitude of data structures?
I think the answer is yes and if so then this is not the solution...
What I'm thinking is , as all scores can be outputted to the server screen via System.out.println, is there not a way of saving all these scores in a single data structure?
The code below is the server code..
any advice much appreciated....thank you
/*=============================================================== */
import java.io.*;
import java.net.*;
import java.util.*;
import java.util.concurrent.*;
class ScoresServer1{
final static int portNum = 1234; // any number > 1024
final static int numThreads = 10;
static ExecutorService pool;
public static void main(String[] args){
pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(numThreads);
System.out.println("Server running ...");
try{
ServerSocket servesock = new ServerSocket(portNum);
// for service requests on port
while (true){
// wait for a service request on port portNum
Socket socket = servesock.accept();
// submit request to pool
pool.submit(new StoreScore(socket));
}catch(IOException e){}
class StoreScore implements Runnable {
BufferedReader reader;
Socket sock;
public StoreScore(Socket clientSOcket) {
try {
sock = clientSOcket;
InputStreamReader isReader = new InputStreamReader(sock.getInputStream());
reader = new BufferedReader(isReader);
} catch (Exception ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); }
public void run() {
String message;
try {
while ((message = reader.readLine()) != null) {
// System.out.println("latest score: " + message);
saveScore(message);
} catch (Exception ex) { ex.printStackTrace(); }
public void saveScore(String message){
ArrayList<String> storedScores = new ArrayList<String>();
storedScores.add(message);
Iterator<String> t = storedScores.iterator();
while(t.hasNext()){
String s = t.next();
System.out.println(s);
}does every thread create a new instance of storedScores and therefore the scores are stored in a multitude of data structures?
I think the answer is yes and if so then this is not the solution...The answer is yes. However, threads can share data, if they were properly synchronized. You should read the threading tutorial before creating a lot of hard to debug mistakes.
[http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/essential/concurrency/] -
Multiple clients on socket connection
Hi!
I understand that it is possible that multiple clients listen to one server (on the same port) and even write to it (then it should be a multi-threaded server).
But i would like to refuse connectios, if one client is connected. How can I do that?
In my case I have a (single threaded) server. Now one clients connects. The server waits to receive data from the client and answers, without ever closing the port. that works.
Now if I connect with a second client, the openicng of the socket in the second client works fine, although the server does not seem to notice the second client. Communication is not possible between the server and the second client, and the server doesn't answer to the first client anymore, although he receives data from it.
So, since the server does not seem to notice the second client (does not accept the connection) and I don't get an exception at the second client, what can I do?
Thank you for your help!
concerned Code (if you want to take a look at it):
CLIENT:
socket = new Socket(hostname, echo_port);
SERVER:
try
ServerSocket waitingsocket = new ServerSocket(echo_port);
try
socket= waitingsocket.accept();
System.out.println("Client connected");
ReaderThread reader = new ReaderThread( this, socket );
reader.start();
catch (Exception e)
READER:
public void run()
while (true)
try {
int bytesRead = inStream.read(inputBuffer,
0, inputBuffer.length);
readCallback.tcpUpdate(inputBuffer,bytesRead);
catch (Exception oops)
readCallback.tcpUpdate(null,-1);
Just to make sure this is clear: You can NOT have multiple clients on a given socket connection. You CAN have multiple clients connected to a particular port on a given server, but each client will be communicating with the server through a different of socket.
The usual approach here is to set up a listening ServerSocket on the desired port, call accept() on it, then process the communication from the returned Socket object. This is usually done by spawning a new thread and allowing it to handle the socket communication, while the ServerSocket loops around to another accept() for the next communication.
Here's an excellent intro to the concepts (the code is really ugly and poorly implemented, but it does a good job of explaining the overall concept). I used this as a starting point, and now (after a whole lot of development) have a pretty sweet extensible web server class that handles template expansion, etc... (I use this as a quick and dirty UI for some of my apps, instead of requiring the user to install a JSP container):
http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/Networking/Webserver/
- K -
Multiple clients with same account on a single IMAP server
Hi,
I am connecting to a IMAP server using same account but from 2 different machines. From one machine a mark a message as SEEN=FALSE. But on the second machine, the flag will still be TRUE.
Is there any way to co-ordinate between multiple clients so that all the clients are in sync.
Regards,
Nitin.I was able to resolve the problem using addMessageCountListener and messagesAdded method, as suggested by you.
I am now facing another problem. Whenever a new message is received, code inside messagesAdded method gets executed. Here I am trying to spawn another thread and do some stuff. But this new thread is not starting at all. It goes into some JavaMail:EventQueue and does nothing. What is the concept of EventQueue here? How can I get this new thread executed?
Also will there be synchronization problems in messagesAdded method. Say I received a message and I am processing it in the messagesAdded method. In the mean time another message comes up. How will this behave. -
How can I connect multiple clients to a single client ?
I am currently developing an instant messaging program.I created a server and connected multiple clients to it by using thread logic.However I do not know how to connect multiple client to a single client.
What shall I do for that?Does anybody know a good tutorial or sample program?Or shall anybody explain me what I shall do for building the Instant Messaging part of my chat program?
Thank u in advance.You may use UDP multicast socket. But since you are using the UDP protocol you might risk losing the data that you send since UDP does not guarantee the safe transfer of data.
Alternately, you might create a server that allows multiple client to connect to it whose connection Socket objects are then stored in a Vector <Socket> object. The server then sends back data to the connected client about the other clients connected to it. Now when the client wants to send data (like an IM) to another connected client, it has to send a request to the server specifying the client login name and the server in turn streams that particular client's Address and Port to the requesting client. The requesting client then initiates the connection with the other client and then starts a conversation. One more thing, when the client communicates it needs to send information to the server like the name by which it likes to be referenced. In this scenario the server acts like a central repository for clients to query the existence of other clients in the chat room. Each client here runs a thread that listens to incoming connections and when a connection is established, may be opens a IM window or something.
The third option is to make the server to relay the information from one client to another. Like say, I'm connected to whoopy server and i want to send "Hello" to jackson, then i send the message (ie, Hello) along with the name of the client to which i wish to send it to (ie, jackson). The server then performs a lookup in its Vector <Socket> object and then initiates a connection with jackson and sends the information. However, this method is pretty costly in that you will be wasting a lot of processing behind the server.
--Subhankar
P.s. If you stumble upon any other brilliant ideas let me know. -
How to handle multiple clients with DatagramSocket
I am trying to handle multiple clients with 1 datagramSocket bind to one port (basically I have only one port to use, and I can not use TCP or any other ports). At the server side I have two threads one for receiving packets and buffering them, another for processing the packets in the buffer and sending replies.
I can have multiple clients sending datagramPackets to me and I will have to process the packets and send them to DIFFERENT clients. Ex. Client 1 sends datagramPacket to Server which sends the processed packet to Client 2. Also Client 2 sends a datagramPacket to Server which again processes the packet and sends it to Client1. May have Client 3 and 4 doing the same thing at the same time... and so on...
My root class is creating the datagramSocket(somePort) and two threads (receiver and sender). How can I use the socket that I created in these two threads??
I have done the following and I am getting "java.net.bindexception". When I am sending stuff from Client1 to Client2 everything is fine but when I start sending something from Client2 to Client 1, I get the bindexception... Client 1 is using port 3000, Client 2 is using port 4000.
I really don't have a lot of experience in socket programming so I am not sure if there is a much simpler way to do this. I appreciate all the tips and help that I can get...
Thanks...
class UDP_serv
static DatagramSocket udpSocket;
final static int SERVER_PORT = 2000;
public static void main(String[] args) throws SocketException
udpSocket= new DatagramSocket(SERVER_PORT);
new DataReceiver().start ();
new DataSender().start ();
static class DataReceiver extends Thread
DataReceiver()
Thread.currentThread().setName("DataReceiver");
public void run()
while (true)
byte pckt[] = new byte [MaxMsgSize];
DatagramPacket dp = new DatagramPacket (pckt, pckt.length);
try
udpSocket.receive (dp);
//PUSH TO RECEIVE BUFFER
catch(Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
static class DataSender extends Thread
DataSender()
Thread.currentThread().setName("DataSender");
public void run()
while (true)
processDataMsg();
static void processDataMsg()
DatagramPacket op;
InetAddress DA = null;
int DP = 0;
byte [] outPacket = null;
// POP FROM RECEIVE BUFFER
// SOME PROCESSING HERE
// Set Destination Address (DA)
// Set Destination Port (DP)
// DA and DP are the forwarding IP and Port addresses
// not the addresses original packet was sent from.
try
op = new DatagramPacket (outPacket, outPacket.length,DA, DP);
udpSocket.send(op);
catch (IOException e)
e.printStackTrace();
}Also for development and testing purposes, I am running the two clients and the server on the same machine (windows xp-32b) so all of the Destination IP Addresses are 127.0.0.1. and as I said Ports that I am using are 2000, 3000, 4000 (Server, Client1, Client2).Hmm I have minimized the code and it seems to be working now.
I think I have an error in the header portion of the data I am sending, where I am storing the source IP/Port and destination IP/Port. I think the server in the middle is messing these values up while sending them to the destination Client. Because the destination client actually receives the stuff and sends the reply back to the server, but the reply packet's headers has 0/0 as the dest IP / Port...
Server is giving me java.net.BindException: Cannot assign requested address error when it tries to forward the reply it received from the client2 as the address it is trying to send is 0!
I guess it doesnt just give this error when you try to open two sockets to the same port...
Paul, Thanks for the direction on how to proceed... took me a while get the minimized code but at least figured out the problem. Well still have to make sure that is THE problem though :)
As far as the statics goes how can I change those to non static ones? Where do I make an instance of the top level class that creates the threads? and how do I pass the DatagramSocket to the threads/ if I dont need to pass how do I call or use the datagramSocket I created in the top level class? I mean do I still kinda have it like a global variable on the top?? A very simple example would be much appreciated...
I think these might be really basic questions but I am having a rough time with the hierarchy in java... -
Program to Create Users in Multiple Clients at Once
Hello experts.
We have a multi-client architecture and I have to frequently create users in many of them at once.
Is there a fast way or does anybody have ABAP code to create users in multiple clients by while also an existing users Roles?
We have a program to copy the users, but I still have to go into every system and assign roles. This is very tedious, so I would appreciate any help.Hello Valhalla,
Try this way:
BAPI_USER_CREATE1 is remote enabled so you can create RFC destination for the all the system
you want to create users.
Load all the rfc destination in one table.
Load all the users need to be created in one table.
Loop at rfc_dest_tab.
loop at users_tab.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_USER_CREATE1' DESTINATION rfc_dest_tab-RFC_DESTINATION
EXPORTING
USERNAME = users_tab-USERNAME
NAME_IN =
LOGONDATA =
PASSWORD =
DEFAULTS =
ADDRESS =
COMPANY =
SNC =
REF_USER =
ALIAS =
EX_ADDRESS =
UCLASS =
TABLES
PARAMETER =
RETURN =
ADDTEL =
ADDFAX =
ADDTTX =
ADDTLX =
ADDSMTP =
ADDRML =
ADDX400 =
ADDRFC =
ADDPRT =
ADDSSF =
ADDURI =
ADDPAG =
ADDCOMREM =
GROUPS =
PARAMETER1 =
EXTIDHEAD =
EXTIDPART = .
ENDLOOP.
ENDLOOP.
This will create required user in remote SAP systems.
Hope this solves your issue!
Thanks,
Augustin.
Edited by: Augustarian on Aug 22, 2009 11:52 AM
Edited by: Augustarian on Aug 22, 2009 11:52 AM
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to fix error code 1935 unpon install elements v12
This adobe troubleshooting process is dismal. How does the company stay in business? I will be contacting amazon for a refund of my purchase of adobe elements 12. The problem? installation error when installing on windows 8.1. This is particularly up
-
RpcOut: couldn't open channel with RPCI protocol
callservicesd and soagent using very CPU and memory. in console, I get the error message as "RpcOut: couldn't open channel with RPCI protocol" Lots of these error messages logged (com.apple.imdmessageservices.IMDMessageServicesAgent) The _DirtyJetsam
-
Can't log with slim since session restart
Hello I need help... What happened ? I have had my user to the group storage, then I close my gnome session, but, when I try to log me with slim, it's doesn't work -_- I put my username, my password, it seem to be OK, but it's load, it's load... and
-
hi, I have downloaded the SMS in Iphone to my PC. I am able to seen the other person photo in the conversation but my photo is missing can i attach my photo and name in the message?
-
Upgrading from 512 to 1.5 GB RAM?
Currently I have a Macbook Pro with just 512 MB of RAM. I was planning on buying this RAM from newegg: http://www.newegg.com/Product/CustratingReview.asp?Item=N82E16820231066 Is it ok to have both a 1 GB and a 512 MB RAM stick in the computer at once