Multiple T and F records in 1099 Misc.

We have a scenario where for various company codes there is one 1099 electronic file (magnetic media) to be generated. These company codes have a different TIN hence "Multiple company code" flag can not be used in the country specific section. We have modified the DMEE to fetch company code details from the Company code configuration.
Now when we generate the 1099 electronic file via program RFIDYYWT. It creates the file with Multiple T, C and F records i.e. per company. Please note that the Transmitter is 1. Hence it should just create 1 T record, multiple A records (payer), Multiple B records ( Vendor), Multiple C record, Multiple K records, and one F record.
Please note i tried running with maintaining payer details in the country specific screen (with std SAP configuration) it is still generating multiple T and F records.
I checked on IRS website for the specification it also expects 1 T and 1 F record.
I looked at the various SAP notes or blogs did not find conclusive solution on this issue. Can somebody help me please ? Am i missing any configuration or setting in RFIDDYYWT ?

Hi Ashish,
I'm having the same issue when creating a single 1099 file with multiple co codes. SAP (S_P00_07000134) is breaking it up into different batches within the 1099 file. So in other words .. it inputs the "F" & "T" record lines in between each company codes. As per the IRS this is unacceptable, and the file should have only one "F" & "T" record.
Could you please share your solution if resolved or please update us on the progress.
Regards,
Barnabas

Similar Messages

1099 misc file format not able to get for multiple WHT code??

Dear Experts,
I am trying to download the file format for 1099 misc IRS reporting for e-filling, i am getting the file for one WHT code 07. but when i am executing this transaction S_P00_07000134 for multiple WHT Code 01 to 14, in the file format, Amount entries are available for all the WHT Code but In the Record "A" only Account code "C" is coming. i have implemented the SAP Note 1666672 version 3 before executing this transaction. Please let me know this is a configuration issue or i am missing to apply other SAP Note. this is very high priority issue now.
Any comments on this are highly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
Saurabh Saxena

I am seeing the same issue. This worked for us last year. But this year the A Record indicates that we only have Withholding code 7, yet our detail records have withholding amounts in columns 1, 6, and 7.
IRS rules state that multiple withholding codes should be concatenated in ascending order in the Header 'A'Record. This must be an issue with the 2011 DMEE file, IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml as this is the only thing that changed in the 2011 note.
Actually, I've just compared last year's IDWTFILE_US_1099.xml file with this year's, and in the part of the transformation where the withholding amount codes are concatenated, it appears a bug was introduced. I'm going to hand-edit my copy of the file to see if it resolves the issue, and I'll cross my fingers that SAP produces a 4th update to note 1666672
Edited by: Timothy Conama on Jan 19, 2012 1:45 AM

1099-MISC Reporting Transmitter Record to IRS

I am researching the file layout for the 1099-MISC data that is transmitted to the IRS in March of each year. The instructions for the "T" transmitter record for field position 519 through 704 require your software vendor information in these fields if the value in Field 518 = V.
I thought that I recalled seeing the SAP (for US) information somewhere in the IMG, but I cannot find it at this time. Could someone please direct me to the correct area to locate the information?
Thanks,
-Patrick

Hello auroar,
I followed the path that you provided and that lead me to this part of the tree: Define File Format for Withholding Tax Reporting...This is where I found the information that I needed.
Thank you very much.
-Patrick
Edited by: Patrick Smith on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 PM

Updating detail record and getting multiple 'UNABLE TO INSERT RECORD' msgs

Help! We have 2 datablocks, master and detail block with relation defined. Master is defined with view based on database joins; detail is view based on table.
When I update the record in detail block, error message 'UNABLE TO INSERT RECORD' appears four times, then I get transaction complete: 5 records applied and saved, where the one record successfully updates. Why are we getting four records with insert errors and one record update? We don't want to work directly on the table, but why can't we use the view? please help.

The UNABLE TO INSERT record will be accompanied by more information if you press the Display Error key. Your form commit processing should stop when it gets an error like this, the fact that it doesn't implies that somewhere in your code you are not checking for FORM_SUCCESS before continuing doing something else.
This sounds quite involved, we would need to have more information about what records are queried and what's being changed on them to cause the commit.

1099-MISC issue in ECC6

This is a new ECC6 implementation and first time 1099 reporting from SAP
We are facing two issues with 1099-MISC reporting. I guess these are not unique problems and you might have faced in other projects as well.
1. We have multiple vendor records/numbers for a vendor with same name and tax id but with different addresses. Invoices have also been paid to these different vendor ids. When generating a 1099 report how can we club these Vendor IDs based on Tax ID so that report is generated for only one vendor id. Please note that we are not using an alternative payee feature in this project.
2. This is quite absurd but when we are taking a printout of the 1099-MISC SAPSCRIPT form for 2008 (which was uploaded from SAP Note 1279366), Box no.11 and 12 are not coming proper. These boxes are greyed out or disabled in actual sample IRS copies but in the printout they are almost blank with few small dots here and there as if some text was printed in it and some one tried to erase it. I think IRS may reject these forms. Please revert if anyone else also faced same issue? If yes, what is the solution?

Hi Chandru,
I am still not convinced with your need. You may want to ask your client to check with their tax department. Though I worked on this config few years back but I clearly remember that client need was to club payments of multiple vendor IDs into one vendor ID for 1099 reporting purpose.
However, I am providing configuration path for 1099 Misc report where Fiscal Adress relating settings are to be made. Same place you can make your own settings. Let me know if it helped.
I am copying text from my word doc as I could not attach it. My original docs has screen shots too,
1099 Report Configs:
Field fiscal address in Vendor Master can be used in report configuration. The field that needs to be checked is Group Items according to fiscal address. The path is SAP Customizing Implementation Guide > Financial Accounting (New) > Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) > Withholding Tax > Withholding Tax > Generic Withholding Tax Reporting > Define Output Groups
In there go to the settings for US_1099 US1. This is available when you double click that line.
Configs for Reporting
Proposed Changes in Report Configuration:
Group Items according to Fiscal Address Ticker Clubs all the items into one vendor
For Type Adobe- Gives us flexibility to create our own forms in Abobe Forms format. This needs help of ABAP team
DME File- This option allows us to save file in the Unix Directory. By This option we can also run the 1099 report job in the background
Fiscal address can be defined in vendor master under Control where you can attach a central vendor to all other related Vendors
Related Vendors-
Vendors in which actual transactions are carried out. Maintain Central Vendor Number in the Fiscal Address Field.
Central Vendor – This Vendor may or may not be extended to Company Codes. Will propose for better control purpose to not to extend to company code and create a new vendor group. As we only need address and Tax ID. (This is maintained in Fiscal Address)

Vendor - 1099 Misc.

Hi,
Can someone please walk me through how to config / set up and print 1099 MISC forms for vendors.
Thanks

Go through these links for
Withholding Tax http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/9e/7e673756772b7fe10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Withholding Tax Data in the Vendor Master Record
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/ea/896737fb6e947ee10000009b38f8cf/content.htm
Generic Withholding Tax Reporting
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/8d/0da93c74d1365fe10000000a114084/content.htm

1099 MISC 2011 file length

Hi Experts
This relates to 1099 MISC 2011 file length. We have applied SAP note 1666672 that pertains to 2011 changes.While the form print looks good, when i compared the file with P1220 ( The publication that specifies details on tax filing), i found that P1220 states that length of records should be 750 for the T and B records - however in my case i get only 746 characters
I generated the file in txt and opened with excel and used LEN to count the length of the records
Any suggestions? - Is there a further SAP note that is to be applied or a i missing something on the DMEE side of it.
Further is P1220 the Gospel to compare the correctness with.
Thanks
Swami

HI swami,
note 1666672 was updated 25th, please, review version 4.
Also make sure you have applied the corrections or steps from notes
1635493, 1673257 and and 1649356.
Regards
Madhu M

1099 Misc IRS file

Hi Team ,
After implementing the SAP Note 1666672 for US legal changes 2011, In 1099 Misc IRS file house number is missing .
Could you please help on this ..
Thank You
Jagadeshwar.G
91-9676486129

HI,
System for the DMEE IDWTFILE_US_1099 (Tree type WTRE).
Could you please change the atom handling flag of the Node
Payee Mailing Addr to 01
I shall explain you the steps required:
a) Transaction DMEE -> Tree Type WTRE -> Format Tree IDWTFILE_US_1099
b) Navigate in the order through the nodes : Transmitter A Record ->
State Totals K Rec -> Transmitter B Record -> Payee Mailing Addr
c) Currently the atom handling for this node is set as blank ; please
change it to '01' as shown in the screenshot.
d) Save and activate the tree.
Regards
Madhu M

1099-MISC nonemployee compensation amount always zero in lower part

Hi,
When I m trying to execute withholding tax report S_P9C_18000158 ( for 1099-MISC ) for multiple vendor account, the form is not printing Nonemployee compensation for vendor who are getting printed in lower half of form. The same is getting printed for all vendor in upper half.
Rest all data are getting printed properly in both half.
The nonemployee compensation amount always shows zero in lower half.
I doubt if we need some notes or any settings? any inputs would be appreciable
Thanks
Pankaj

Hi Praveen,
Thanks a lot for the input.
Yes I tried downloading the file and the amount shows correctly for both upper and lower part.
Infact I have already checked sapscript form and found in std program the amount in lower form is assigned to bset-fwbase field and sapscript forms prints the value
in field *bset-fwbase. so its only changing the assignment in td prg.
But before doing the repair ...I just wanted to know if there is some notes provided for this so that we dont have to touch std code..
let me know if u r aware of any...
Thanks
Pankaj

1099 Misc- RFIDYWWT program not selecting by clearing date

Hello,
I am trying to run the transaction S_P00_07000134 - Generic Withholding Tax Reporting for 1099 Misc forms in ECC6.0. It is not pulling the vendor line items by the clearing date like the old 4.6 1099 program did (RFW1099M). For example, an item was posted in 2007 and paid in 2008. This is not getting picked up in the RFIDYWWT program. Am I missing something? I've selected Document clearing date under the output control and lists, but I don't think that's the right spot for data selection.
Any help would be appreciated!
-Lori

Thanks Carol! That is exactly it. I did resort to putting in an OSS message - and that's what they told me after she "yelled" at me for asking the question...it wasn't a software issue, but remote consulting. I'd like to see where in the SAP help it tells you that if you're not familiar with the program!
Thanks again,
-Lori

1099 Misc reporting for US in SAP Standard report not containing any value

HI All,
In my current clients requirement is to get the SAP Standard reprort for 1099 Misc reporting for US
1) Accordingly i have done configuration for Withholding tax for US with tax type FE
2) There are 14 WHT Tax codes under FE , like 01 = Rent , 02 = royalty, 03 = other income etc.
3) Assigned Tax type with Co. Code
4) Activated WHT tax at Co. code
5) Created WHT country US
And also assign WHT tax type FE and respective tax code to vendors in Accounting info in Vendor Master
Posted couple of vendor invoices and made payment for those also
Then after this when i run the SAP Standard report for 1099 Misc reporting for US , then the output contains with no data.. but only contains vedor names and WHT tax code which i have assigned..
I think i have missed some configuration may be . Can any one let me know the detail step by step config and process how to get proper out put in 1099 Misc reporting for US in Standard reporting..
Regards,
Sandip

Hello auroar,
I followed the path that you provided and that lead me to this part of the tree: Define File Format for Withholding Tax Reporting...This is where I found the information that I needed.
Thank you very much.
-Patrick
Edited by: Patrick Smith on Oct 22, 2009 8:41 PM

1099 Misc by SSN not by Vendor ID

Dear Experts:
We use tcode: s_p00_07000134 / program RFIDYYWT to generate our 1099 MISC forms and file. We are on ECC 604 and have Extended Withholding Tax activated.
The forms and file are generated by Vendor ID but unfortunately we have some vendors with the same TIN. Is there a way to change the config/program to group by TIN when calculating tax amounts instead of by Vendor ID?
Thanks for any guidance,
Cindy

Just checking one more time to see if anyone has any ideas. . . otherwise we may need to write a custom program to handle this.

1099 vendors, S_PL0_09000314 - 1099-Misc

Hi,
I have an issue while running the S_PL0_09000314 - 1099-Misc report. I created a test 1099 vendor, by maintaining (1) tax number under tax information and (2) Witholding tax code 07 for the vendor. With these settings, I posted an invoice and paid the vendor.
The issue is while running the report S_PL0_09000314 - 1099-Misc, it says "list contains no data" (under vendors with correct TIN). However, in the same report, I was able to see the vendor listed under Wrong TIN:Vendors.
Also, when I ran the 1099 listings (S_ALR_87012143 - 1099 Listings), it showed the vendor with the list of documents posted/cleared.
What could be the problem that S_PL0_09000314 - 1099-Misc is not showing the vendor under under vendors with correct TIN. Am I missing something here?
Any help is hightly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Dominic,
I would appreciate if you could help me on the following
When I run S_P00_07000134 - Generic Withholding Tax Reporting to generate the 1099 output I get the following errors
1. Company code 3000's witholding tax reference number is missing
2. Unable to print form IDWTCERT_US_1099MISC
I chose the following in the program
Process group: US_1099
Output group: US1
Am I missing any configuration or something else here?
Would appreciate any kind of help.
Thanks

1099 MISC not in dollar

hi all,
i am having an issue with 1099 MISC report, because I am running the report with a vendor with invoices with currency . Nevertheless this report is used for North America goverment, but the report doesn't convert the amount from to $.
I have trying to find some OSS notes, but anyone found.
Could anyone give me any clue about it?
Thanks in advance.

this is the answer, if anyone is interested.
<u><i>Program RFKQSU30 is an old program that does not cover the latest
legal changes regarding the 1099MISC reporting. For this reason, this
program has not been adapted to cover the Unicode standards, which
in turn leads to the dump that you have noticed.
To create the 1099MISC reporting, please use the generic reporting
withholding tax reporting tool RFIDYYWT or, in lower releases, the
report RFW1099M. For more information, please see note 776419 and
the related notes.</i></u>
thanks for all

Problem sending mail to hostname with multiple IN A DNS Records

Hi there
I've been using the javamail API without problems for some 2 years now in the company I'm working for.
The problems started this week, when the hostname I'm using to send out mails via SMTP, now has multiple 'IN A' DNS records, but allthough all of them respond to a 'ping' only some of them (as of today) accepts a connection on port 25.
The problem is now, that I get random sending errors whenever the DNS lookup of hostname resolves to an IP where no SMTP server is listening on port 25.
I have the following questions:
First of all: Is there an RFC (or other standard behavior) that say a SMTP client should behave like that (throw an exception if the first connection of an round robin DNS lookup fails)? I known that real SMTP servers work more with DNS MX records to find an alternative server, if the first server is unavailable. But javamail is more like a SMTP client, not a fully blown SMTP server.
What is the best way to solve this problem (if the Mailserver/DNS guys aren't cooperative)? I saw that you can pass a custom SocketFactory via properties to javamail. So would the proper solution be to implement a custom SocektFactory, that resolves all the different IP addresses for a hostname, and only returns a Socket, to which address and port it actually could get a connection.
Sorry for my bad english
-Reto

Have you talk to your network or server administrator to find out why your server is only
accepting connections on some IP addresses, even though it's returning all of them via
DNS lookups? Seems like a mistake to me.
If, for some strange reason, this behavior is on purpose, your socket factory idea may
be the best approach.
Also check whether there is a different DNS name you can use for the server that will
resolve to the IP address where it will accept connections.

Multiple T and F records in 1099 Misc.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for