Multiple Web Applications WLS 7.0

Hi,
I am trying to configure multiple web applications on the same WL 7.0 server and
am having trouble doing the following.
I would like to be able to use the following URLS:
Application #1:
http://myserver/st/aems - where st/aems maps to the path X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source\htdocs
Application #2:
http://myserver/st/acms - where st/aems maps to the path X:\SimpleTrade2\ACMS\ui\source\htdocs
Root - Default web application - This would be left empty with the idea that our
company could sell our web applications and we would deploy them on someone elses
WLS and we would not conflict in any way.
The problem with the above is that when I look at the DTD and try and configure
config.xml in the following way:
<Application Deployed="true" Name="AEMS"
Path="X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source\htdocs" TwoPhase="true">
<WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="2000" Name="aems"
Targets="simpletradeserver" URI="st/aems"/>
WLS blows up on startup because it tries to POST-Pend the URI to the path... If
I change it to:
<Application Deployed="true" Name="AEMS"
Path="X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source" TwoPhase="true">
<WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="2000" Name="aems"
Targets="simpletradeserver" URI="htdocs"/>
This will work but then my URL is not what I want it becomes http://myserver/htdocs
Is there anyway around this or a way to get what I want?
Another piece of information, I am developing in Exploded directory format when
we deploy it will be as an ear.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!!!
-Jerry Rodgers

Thanks for the info Christian.
I thought I would pass along a bit more inforation for others who might be trying
to do something similar. In case they run across this message.
I did determine that if you are using a .WAR file the name attribute of the xml
node WebAppComponent will allow you to create a different context path than the
URI. I did not test to see if it allowed you to use a name like "st/aems" I am
sure "st.aems" would work or any name that may be different than the URI. The
weird thinhg is that when using the EXPLODED DIRECTORY format the URI is the name
of the folder under the path and the name property appears to be ignored no matter
what you change it to you can only get to your web app using the URI.
Hope this helps someone who comes after me and is looking for the same thing,
maybe they won't spend 6 hours on it like I did ;>
-Jerry
"Christian Plenagl" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
Hi,
this is not possible.
The URI field contains the directory name of the WebApplication, which
normally
is the same name as the directory where you put the webapplication in.
Christian Plenagl
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support
"Jerry Rodgers" <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to configure multiple web applications on the same WL 7.0
server and
am having trouble doing the following.
I would like to be able to use the following URLS:
Application #1:
http://myserver/st/aems - where st/aems maps to the path X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source\htdocs
Application #2:
http://myserver/st/acms - where st/aems maps to the path X:\SimpleTrade2\ACMS\ui\source\htdocs
Root - Default web application - This would be left empty with the idea
that our
company could sell our web applications and we would deploy them onsomeone
elses
WLS and we would not conflict in any way.
The problem with the above is that when I look at the DTD and try and
configure
config.xml in the following way:
<Application Deployed="true" Name="AEMS"
Path="X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source\htdocs" TwoPhase="true">
<WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="2000" Name="aems"
Targets="simpletradeserver" URI="st/aems"/>
WLS blows up on startup because it tries to POST-Pend the URI to the
path... If
I change it to:
<Application Deployed="true" Name="AEMS"
Path="X:\SimpleTrade2\AEMS\ui\source" TwoPhase="true">
<WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="2000" Name="aems"
Targets="simpletradeserver" URI="htdocs"/>
This will work but then my URL is not what I want it becomes http://myserver/htdocs
Is there anyway around this or a way to get what I want?
Another piece of information, I am developing in Exploded directoryformat
when
we deploy it will be as an ear.
Thanks in advance for any ideas!!!
-Jerry Rodgers

Similar Messages

  • Authentication Across Multiple Web Applications (Revisited)

              Its been an ongoing battle, but I've made some insight into this situation. The problem stands as it seems impossible to authenticate against one web application deployed as a WAR archive and have that authentication carry across to another web application with the same security constraints. I've been told by BEA that, quote:
              "It seems to me that we are violating section 11.6 of the servlet 2.2 spec which talks about webapps"
              I've also been told that this is fixed in WLS 6.0, reference issue #38732.
              For those of us building production environments using 5.1 instead of 6.0 XML based configuration, this does NOT solve our problem.
              I've dug further into the bowels of 5.1 and found that if you manually set the realm name in the login-config of the security constraint in the web.xml file in each WAR deployment as such:
                   <login-config>
                        <auth-method> [whichever method] </auth-method>
                        <realm-name>WebLogic Server</realm-name>
                   </login-config>
              Authentication will carry across web applications. However, I've noted that the session management then becomes unpredictable. For example:
              I log into the application TESTAPP1 which contains a protected servlet that outputs the session ID and attempts to get the authenticated principal name from the "_wl_authuser_" session variable. Upon first load of the page (after the login dialog box), the session is null [can be fixed with .getSession(true) call instead] and the "_wl_authuser_" object does not exist. Reload the page and the session appears as well as the "_wl_authuser_" object. Strange.
              I then move to TESTAPP2, which does not prompt me for authentication but also is missing the session in the same manner. Upon browser reload, the session is created with a different ID and the "_wl_authuser_" object is now available with the appropriate principal name.
              Upon moving back to TESTAPP1, I am not prompted for authentication however, I am assigned yet another session ID after browser reload, different from the first.
              So it seems that although authentication is carried across web applications, the session IDs as you move from TESTAPP1 to TESTAPP2 change, and then change again but not back to the original when going back to TESTAPP1.
              This is a particular problem since we are using Vignette's V5 as our main client and tracking sessions through V5 - this would quickly become unmanageable if a single page view access three or four different application components with three or four different session ids.
              I'm wondering if we can expect the same behavior from WLS 6.0?
              Ideally, I'd like to see WebLogic use a single session ID to track users across multiple web applications but still have session independence between applications. So if I store something in session in TESTAPP1, its not available in TESTAPP2. Does this outline the behaviour in WLS 6.0? Can anyone verify this?
              Some food for thought. Thanks!
              ./Chris
              Senior Systems Anaylst
              MassMutual Financial Group
              

    Hello! I am searching an answer to this question too!!!
    Did you get some news regarding this item?
    Regards,
    C.M.

  • Pros & Cons of having multiple web applications under one EAR project

    Could anybody let me know what are the advantages and disadvantages of having multiple web applications under one single EAR project?

    Either this is homework, in which case, do it yourself, or you already think you have some pros for doing this. Share with us

  • Storing SessionManager or Server for multiple web applications

    We currently have one enterprise application with 2 web applications installed. These 2 web applications must share the same session cache.
    Toplink is installed as a shared library for both of these web applications.
    What I am wondering is how Server and SessionManager should be utilized.
    In our servlet initialization of web application one we get an instance of the SessionManager and assign the SessionManager to a static instance variable.
    static SessionManager sessionManager;
    sessionManager = SessionManager.getManager();
    Now whenever we want to get a client session from either web application we make the call
    Server serverSession = (Server) sessionManager.getSession("XXX");
    From looking at the code for the sessionManager.getSession("XXX") I see that this
    results in a synchronized method invocation which is in turn bottlenecking our database access code.
    My question is should we not just be storing the Server in a static instance variable to distribute client sessions to both web applications and not the SessionManager.

    Hi,
    One SSA is ok, but you should think about access rights. If the access is clear cut between all the web apps you should be ok with one SSA. Multiple result sources limiting on content source also works, but could easily be bypassed.
    Multiple SSA's will eat up RAM/CPU like a mother :)
    As for popular etc.. it could be due to how those sources are set up, but haven't investigated or tested this much.
    Thanks,
    Mikael
    Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
    http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
    Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

  • One Search service application for multiple web applications in a single server

      We are planning to host 17 Web applications in a single Server. Do I need to create search service application for each web application or I need to create one  Search service application , create a Content source for each web
    application and create a Result source for filtering. Which is the best approach. And which approach takes more RAM memory.
       In my application I am using Search web part, "Recently Changed Items", "Popular Items" web parts. when I created only one one  Search Service application for all web applications and using Result sources ,
    I am not getting the results. What could be the problem.

    Hi,
    One SSA is ok, but you should think about access rights. If the access is clear cut between all the web apps you should be ok with one SSA. Multiple result sources limiting on content source also works, but could easily be bypassed.
    Multiple SSA's will eat up RAM/CPU like a mother :)
    As for popular etc.. it could be due to how those sources are set up, but haven't investigated or tested this much.
    Thanks,
    Mikael
    Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
    http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
    Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

  • Problem in synching multiple web applications

    I have a domain called myDomain. In this domain I have 2 enterprise applications
    say
    ent1App with ent1App-project and ent2App with its ent2App-project. Each enterpsrise
    application has one web application
    (webApp1 and webApp2 respectively). I have the same set of webflow files (.wf
    files) in both
    ent1App-project/application-sync/web-apps/webApp1 and ent2App-project/application-sync/web-apps/webApp2
    directories.
    Now suppose I synchronize my webflows (using EBCC) for say ent1App. The synchronization
    is accomplished without any problems
    and this is confirmed when the entries get updated in the Master Data Repository
    where all the webflows for ent1App get
    stored. This is as viewd using the datasyncservlet.
    If I now do a synchronization on the other enterprise application called ent2App,
    the synchronization takes place
    successfully but when viewed in the datasyncservlet, it shows up the entries for
    the webflows of ent2App. i.e. the entries
    for all the weblows of ent1App which were shown in the Master Data repository
    are not shown.
    We looked up the Cloudscape database to ensure that the entries for both the enterprise
    applications are present and it does
    contain the records for both the applications. This however does not show up in
    the datasync servlet. Due to this we get a
    namespace not found error whenever we try to access the application whose entries
    are missing in the master data repository.
    I have separate names for my datasync folder for each of the applications in my
    config.xml as shown below
    ent1App
    <Application Deployed="true" Name="ent1App"
    Path=".\config\myDomain\applications\ent1App" StagedTargets="iden_staging">
         <WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="1002" Name="datasync" Targets="iden_staging"
    URI="datasync"/>
    ent2App
    <Application Deployed="true" Name="ent2App"
    Path=".\config\myDomain\applications\ent2App" StagedTargets="iden_staging">
    <WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="1002" Name="datasyncDev"
    Targets="iden_staging" URI="datasyncDev"/>
    I am using WLS6.1 SP4 and WLP 4.0 SP3
    Can someone please tell me what could be the problem?
    Thanks
    Shah Jimmy

    When you peform a data sync you are updating the data_sync_item table
    with the EBCC xml files. For those files that are not present in the
    EBCC project they will be deleted from the table.
    You can not use multiple enterprise applications that contain Portals.
    Try using using multiple domains that contain separate databases for
    datasyncs.
    Here is a snippet I recently sent out in a support case:
    Unfortunately there is not a documented best practice for maintaining
    multiple projects and enterprise applications. In my opinion if you
    plan to create multiple enterprise applications they will need to
    maintain separate application components and web applications. The
    enterprise applications will need to use the same portal resources
    (pools) and therefore same tables. The synchronization modes documented
    at http://e-docs.bea.com/wlp/docs40/deploygd/appdata.htm explain the
    limitations in data sync -- either all files are deleted and updated or
    only modified files are updated. Either mode will delete files from the
    data_sync_item table that do not exist in the current project.
    Therefore one project will need to be used per domain.
    -- Jim
    Jimmy Shah wrote:
    I have a domain called myDomain. In this domain I have 2 enterprise applications
    say
    ent1App with ent1App-project and ent2App with its ent2App-project. Each enterpsrise
    application has one web application
    (webApp1 and webApp2 respectively). I have the same set of webflow files (.wf
    files) in both
    ent1App-project/application-sync/web-apps/webApp1 and ent2App-project/application-sync/web-apps/webApp2
    directories.
    Now suppose I synchronize my webflows (using EBCC) for say ent1App. The synchronization
    is accomplished without any problems
    and this is confirmed when the entries get updated in the Master Data Repository
    where all the webflows for ent1App get
    stored. This is as viewd using the datasyncservlet.
    If I now do a synchronization on the other enterprise application called ent2App,
    the synchronization takes place
    successfully but when viewed in the datasyncservlet, it shows up the entries for
    the webflows of ent2App. i.e. the entries
    for all the weblows of ent1App which were shown in the Master Data repository
    are not shown.
    We looked up the Cloudscape database to ensure that the entries for both the enterprise
    applications are present and it does
    contain the records for both the applications. This however does not show up in
    the datasync servlet. Due to this we get a
    namespace not found error whenever we try to access the application whose entries
    are missing in the master data repository.
    I have separate names for my datasync folder for each of the applications in my
    config.xml as shown below
    ent1App
    <Application Deployed="true" Name="ent1App"
    Path=".\config\myDomain\applications\ent1App" StagedTargets="iden_staging">
         <WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="1002" Name="datasync" Targets="iden_staging"
    URI="datasync"/>
    ent2App
    <Application Deployed="true" Name="ent2App"
    Path=".\config\myDomain\applications\ent2App" StagedTargets="iden_staging">
    <WebAppComponent DeploymentOrder="1002" Name="datasyncDev"
    Targets="iden_staging" URI="datasyncDev"/>
    I am using WLS6.1 SP4 and WLP 4.0 SP3
    Can someone please tell me what could be the problem?
    Thanks
    Shah Jimmy

  • One IDP and multiple web applications

    Continuing to look at the configuration necessary to enable SAML on my 2013 farm, I have two web apps which i would like to have SAML running on, both leveraging the same 3rd party IDP for authentication. As I dug into the various stages of configuration
    there is a part that establishes the SharePoint site realm identifier...researching what this is for, i found an article by Steve Peschka (http://blogs.technet.com/b/speschka/archive/2010/04/27/how-to-create-multiple-claims-auth-web-apps-in-a-single-sharepoint-2010-farm.aspx)
    in it he talks about if you have one IDP but multiple web apps that must use that IDP.
    Am i correct in understanding that when steve mentioned "You can only associate a token-signing certificate from an STS with one SPTrustedIdentityTokenIssuer." That the TS cert I import from my IDP is unique and is only able to be linked to one
    Web Application...unless i create a URI that makes Sharepoint aware of the additional web app?
    Going further...I can't just import another copy of the TS cert and set it to another name unique from the first one?, once this is done i could then create a new unique realm for that additional web app with that other cert. Then when configuring the web
    apps it would list two IDP's for me to choose from and i would assign them individually to on or the other.
    His article covered 2010 not sure how 2013 works with this stuff...new territory for me here so forgive my lack of knowledge on how this all comes together.
    Also, is there some sort of configuration necessary for Office web apps farm to work with SAML or is that handled through S2S communication and is beyond SAML?

    Right, so your IDP will have a single certificate which will be single-instanced on the SharePoint farm. Steve's article is accurate for SharePoint 2013 and I've used this method with ADFS. It should be no different, on the SharePoint side, with other IDPs.
    WAC is beyond SAML. The S2S/JWTs take care of it.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • How to use a tag library in multiple web applications?

    Morning all,
    Environment: Tomcat 5 on Apache2 using Mod_JK connector on Windows XP
    I have developed a custom tag library and tested it out and its working great.
    Now, How do I use in my other web applications? Do I need to copy the JAR file to webapps\app1\WEB-INF\lib, webapps\app2\WEB-INF\lib etc directories?
    The problem with this approach is, if I happen to change the tag library code, I will have to make sure that I remember to copy the new JAR file to the above mentioned directories. Ofcourse I can write a simple ant script that would do it for me, but I was wondering if there was an efficient and yet simple way of achieving the same.
    Thanks in advance,
    Joe

    Thanks Vidyut! You've answered my question.
    I placed the jar file in the $CATALINA_HOME/shared/lib directory. But where should I place the taglib TLD file? And how should I reference it in web.xml?
    Currently, my web.xml is as follows and it doesn't work.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
    <!DOCTYPE web-app
    PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
    "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
    <web-app>
    <taglib>
    <taglib-uri>http://abc.com</taglib-uri>
    <taglib-location>c:\Tomcat\shared\lib\mytags-taglib.tld</taglib-location>
    </taglib>
    </web-app>
    Thanks again!
    Joe

  • Possible for JRockit Mission Control to Monitor Multiple Web Applications

    I have some questions regarding JRockit and Weblogic Server.
    The JRockit Mission Control allows users to monitor JRockit JVMs.
    If a JVM runs a Weblogic server instance which runs a couple of web aplications, is it possible to monitor individual web applications separately?
    If it's possible, is there any kind soul who can guide me through the process in setting up.
    Please assist. Many Thanks!
    Thanks,
    Benjamin

    Hi,
    You can use *"wlnav.war"* which is freely available on net. to monitor Servers along with some of the Application attributes like application state/ Session count/ ...etc
    "wlnav.war" actually uses WebLogic MBeans to get the details of the Server and Applications...Same thing we can do using our own MBean JMX Codes as well... But still these JMX codes will not be able to tell exactly that which object belongs to which Application.
    Thanks
    Jay SenSharma
    http://weblogic-wonders.com/weblogic/jmx_weblogic/  (WebLogic Wonders Are Here)

  • Can you run multiple Excel Services Applications against a single Web Application?

    I have been struggling with this one for a while now, hopefully someone can help me understand what I am missing...
    I have a single SharePoint Farm.  This farm runs multiple Web Applications & the Service Applications.
    1. SharePoint Only Server with Multiple Site Collections (http://sharepoint.com/...)
    2. MS Project Server with Multiple Site Collections (http://pwa.com/...)
    3. My services applications all exist on the same farm.
    I was under the impression, and believe that I validated this through testing and from this site (http://blogs.office.com/2009/11/16/excel-services-in-sharepoint-2010-administration-improvements),
    that you can only run a single Excel Services Application against each unique Web Application.  In essence, I can run one Excel Services Application against the SharePoint Only Server, and another Excel Services Application against the MS Project
    Server...  However, I can NOT run multiple Excel Services Applications against the different Site Collections within the MS Project Server becuase it is only aware of its "default" Excel Service Application. 
    ie. I can NOT do the following:  ExcelServiceApp1 for
    http://pwa.com/SiteA & ExcelServiceApp2 for
    http://pwa.com/SiteB
    Is that correct?
    If that is not correct, then I must be missing a way to specify a different Excel Service App for each Project Web App Site. 
    Some other solutions that I think may work, but would really appreciate if someone could validate:
    - Create multiple Project Server Service Applications for each instance of PWA/Excel Service? (but wouldn't this still have to use one of the two WebApplications and cause the same limitation?)
    - Create a new Web Applciation for each PWA/Excel Service?  (ie.
    http://pwasite1.com;
    http://pwasite2.com; http://pwasite3.com, etc.)
    Thoughts/suggestions are very greatly appreciated!!!

    Hello Trpy2k
    I have not done what you are doing and I assume that you are using project server 2010.  However, you answer lives in PowerShell.
    The New-WebServiceProxy show that you can create a new proxy by spacing a URL and not a web application. The default proxy from the web application is directing to the default excel service.  If you need another excel service, you must specify another
    proxy and this may do it for you.
    Also, don't forget the Secure State service and that each excel report will need this configured, that is with the assumption that the other excel service requires different authentication.
    PS.  This question may get a better answer in the SharePoint forums.
    Cheers!
    Michael Wharton, MVP, MBA, PMP, MCT, MCTS, MCSD, MCSE+I, MCDBA
    Website http://www.WhartonComputer.com
    Blog http://MyProjectExpert.com contains my field notes and SQL queries

  • Unable to force logout of Default Web Application

    Thi is a repost : still having the problem ... any ideas ?
    Original Post ........................................
    ........................................................ I am having a problemlogging out....I can not log out. Using WLS 6.0sp1 using form based authentication
    with a custom RDMBS Realm. I believe this functionality was working but now that
    the application has been set up as the default web application logout no longer
    works ?
    In our application we have a logout link that points to a jsp page that does the
    following:
    <% if (session != null) session.invalidate(); session = null; %>
    Note, this is the last jsp to be executed on the page. I looked at the compiled
    servlet and it doesn not appear that anything is being done that would reinitialize
    the session ...
    Here is the try-catch of the compiled jsp servlet .. try { // error page try block
    out.print("...");
    if (session != null) session.invalidate();
    session = null;
    out.print("...."); .... }
    catch (Exception __ee) {
    while (out != null && out != originalOut) out = pageContext.popBody(); pageContext.handlePageException(_ee);
    After this page is returned, the user can still access protected content, any
    ideas ????
    Is there a method in Weblogic security package to deauthenticate a user to force
    re authentication ?
    I just double checked it and lo and behold the session is actually being invalidated
    because the users session data is gone, however they are still able to access
    protected resources. Does this mean that weblogic is not using session to maintain
    authenicated flag ? Or does this mean that the call to pageContext.popBody() is
    creating a new session ? Or does this mean that weblogic has a bug ? Or does this
    mean that I don't know what I'm doing ?
    Bea, please provide a complete response, I have seen this type of post many times
    on this board, can we solve this problem once and for all.
    Thank you kindly,
    Mark Lesk

    I checked this angle. They are able to see protected content.
    However, bea has finally acknowledged the problem. It exists when you are using
    multiple web applications with single sign-on.
    The problem has supposedly been fixed in a rolling patch available for SP2 of
    WebLogic 6.0. Three new methods have been added that provide the ability to log
    users out.
    Hip Hip Hooray !!!!
    See this link : http://commerce.bea.com/downloads/wls_patches.jsp
    The new logout methods are described in the associated readme.
    Thanks
    - Mark
    "mblumrich" <[email protected]> wrote:
    potentially a silly question.... but are you sure the users are not simply
    looking at pages that are in the web browser's cache? Are they able to
    look
    at privileged content that they haven't seen before?
    cheers,
    Markus
    "Mark Lesk" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    Thi is a repost : still having the problem ... any ideas ?
    Original Post ........................................
    ........................................................ I am having
    a
    problem
    logging out....I can not log out. Using WLS 6.0sp1 using form basedauthentication
    with a custom RDMBS Realm. I believe this functionality was workingbut
    now that
    the application has been set up as the default web application logoutno
    longer
    works ?
    In our application we have a logout link that points to a jsp pagethat
    does the
    following:
    <% if (session != null) session.invalidate(); session = null; %>
    Note, this is the last jsp to be executed on the page. I looked atthe
    compiled
    servlet and it doesn not appear that anything is being done that wouldreinitialize
    the session ...
    Here is the try-catch of the compiled jsp servlet .. try { // errorpage
    try block
    out.print("...");
    if (session != null) session.invalidate();
    session = null;
    out.print("...."); .... }
    catch (Exception __ee)
    while (out != null && out != _originalOut) out = pageContext.popBody();pageContext.handlePageException(__ee);
    After this page is returned, the user can still access protected content,any
    ideas ????
    Is there a method in Weblogic security package to deauthenticate auser to
    force
    re authentication ?
    I just double checked it and lo and behold the session is actuallybeing
    invalidated
    because the users session data is gone, however they are still ableto
    access
    protected resources. Does this mean that weblogic is not using sessionto
    maintain
    authenicated flag ? Or does this mean that the call topageContext.popBody() is
    creating a new session ? Or does this mean that weblogic has a bug? Or
    does this
    mean that I don't know what I'm doing ?
    Bea, please provide a complete response, I have seen this type of postmany times
    on this board, can we solve this problem once and for all.
    Thank you kindly,
    Mark Lesk

  • Setup Team Foundation Server - Team Site Collection - SharePoint Web Application Settings failed with error TF205014, TF250025

    Hi
    I have TFS server installed and working with other SharePoint farm.  (TFS installed,  SharePoint extension installed and Granted Access for TFS.
    When Setup TFS - SharePoint Web Application Settings,  It ask for the three values:
    Web Application URL:  
    Central Administration URL:
    Default Location of team project collection sites:
    What notice about the TFS sites that are working is that they are Path Based Site Collection.  Created with SharePoint Web Application managed path (like
    http://spserver/sites/tfs_site1) and so it easy to see it will work.
    Web Application URL:  http://spserver
    CA URL :   http://spserver:portnumber
    Default Location :  Sites or any managed path
    We start using Host Name Site Collection (HNSC) to get the benefit of multiple unique site name without having multiple web application for each.  Work great but when we tried to setup and extend TFS service on the HNSC, we could
    not get them to work and got errors when trying different variation of path URL.
    After doing lot of searching on this, I came up pretty empty and I don't know if that is possible so my question is Have anyone able to setup TFS to work with SharePoint 2013 Host Name Site Collection?  
    If you have, a simple yes will be great but please share or even if anyone think it is possible or not possible, please share too.
    Thanks in advance for any comment / suggestion.
    Swanl

    Hi  Swanl,
    I’m afraid that we cannot setup TFS to work  with SharePoint 2013 Host Name Site Collection.
    Also you can  initial a new thread in Visual Studio Team Foundation Server forums:
    Team Foundation Server – General: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?forum=tfsgeneral
    More experts for Team Foundation Server will assist you, then you will get more information relation to your issue.
    For integrating SharePoint 2013 with Team Foundation Server 2013 you can have a look at the following blog:
    http://nakedalm.com/integrate-sharepoint-2013-with-team-foundation-server-2013/
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support,
    contact [email protected]
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • SSL Certificate to apply on more web application - SharePoint 2013

    Hi,
    based on your experiences, I'd like to know which SSL certificates are good in order to apply them for more web applications in a SharePoint 2013 farm. Saying a good SSL certificate I intend a SSL certificate not more expensive. The idea is to buy one
    certificate with 1 or 2 year licence and use it for two, three, ... web applications.
    Fe, I've a look to Thawte certificates but I don't find any info talking about the possibility to apply one certificate for more web applications.
    Any suggests to me, please?

    A single-host certificate applies to one host, or a single Web Application using Path-based Site Collections.
    A SAN certificate applies to multiple, limited number of hosts for use with multiple Web Applications using Path-based Site Collections (or in a limited fashion, Host-named Site Collections).
    A Wildcard certificate applies to an unlimited number of hosts, or an unlimited number of Web Applications using Path or Host-named Site Collections.
    You want a wildcard, unless you have a good reason to not want a wildcard.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Share graphic layout across web applications (WAR)

    Does somebody know how to share graphic layout across web applications?
    e.g. how to dynamically include a layout html across multiple webapps, so, if I make a change to that layout,, the change is automatically reflected in all webapplications already deployed.
    any idea will be appreciated

    Hi,
    To have a common layout across multiple web applications you can use cascading style sheets (css). By making use of the same style sheet you can have the same appearance in all the web applications. Changing the styles in the css will be reflected in all the pages that make use of this css. The changes wont be effected though in all the already deployed web applications. They will have to be re deployed for the changes to take effect.
    Hope this helps you
    Cheers
    Giri :-)
    Creator Team

  • Is there a PS sript to put different web applications in maintenance mode

    HI,
    I have 2007 R2 SCOM environment.Multiple Web applications is monitored. I got request to put together PS script which could put web application to maintenance mode so it wouldn't not alert while somebody working on it and puts it down. Is there possible
    way to do that.
    Thanks
    Balys

    Hi
    There are different ways to interpret "web applications" - if this is basic URL monitoring then this can be done as follows:
    http://www.scom2k7.com/schedule-a-into-url-maintenance-mode/
    http://www.scom2k7.com/schedule-a-group-of-urls-into-maintenance-mode/
    I have done similar for process monitors here:
    https://systemcentersolutions.wordpress.com/2010/04/03/scheduled-maintenance-process-monitors/
    The idea behind all of these is that you'll need to find out the target class and then put that class into maintenance mode.
    Regards
    Graham

Maybe you are looking for


HashFlare