Mystery ATI card

I have recently acquired an old ati pci card from a g3 and it has an av in, s video in and a tv out as well as an old monitor port. I have no idea what it is and I was wondering if and how I could find a driver for it.
867 mhz G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)   1.25 GB RAM, 60 GB HD, 3 Monitor Display

Build-to-Order B&W G3s that shipped with the "A/V bundle" included the graphics card that you have - the ATI XCLAIM VR. It featured the Rage Pro chip and had 4 MBs of onboard SGRAM and an expansion slot for an additional 4 MB SGRAM SO-DIMM. The stock Apple/ATI Rage 128 graphics card that shipped with most B&W G3s was actually a newer/faster card than the XCLAIM VR. Unlike the beige G3s that shipped with the A/V personality card, the B&W had no onboard video I/O options, so the XCLAIM VR filled that hardware void. Mac OS 8.6 and newer versions have built-in support for the card, with the included ATI drivers. I actually installed that same card in a (pre-OS X) 7300, and used the ATI Universal Installer 4.2, but I didn't attempt to use the video I/O ports. Apple's A/V bundle included a software CD with "Avid Cinema," for video editing.

Similar Messages

  • Whats the deal with ati cards?

    ive been reading through these pages and it cant really make head nor tail of the info regarding ati cards.
    i plan to get a sapphire radeon 9700 pro ultimate to stick into a new K7N2 Delta L mobo. no can somebody give me a straight answer on this, will it cause me grief? will there be lock ups, black screens etc....
    also, will the heat pipe thing used by it(massive) actually fit in the mobo ok?
    cheers

    Quote
    Originally posted by rooster098
    ive been reading through these pages and it cant really make head nor tail of the info regarding ati cards.
    i plan to get a sapphire radeon 9700 pro ultimate to stick into a new K7N2 Delta L mobo. no can somebody give me a straight answer on this, will it cause me grief? will there be lock ups, black screens etc....
    also, will the heat pipe thing used by it(massive) actually fit in the mobo ok?
    cheers
    Hi,
       The black screen problem on boot seems to be with the newer bios versions, seems to work fine on the original )

  • Fresh Win7 install S410 won't reconise ATI card

    Hi, 
    I recently purchased an S410 and installed Windows 7, I've installed all the drivers and everything works fine except the ATI graphics card.
    I have installed the correct drivers from this site but I can't figure out how to get the computer to use the card. 
    In the device manager there is a yellow flag by the ATI card and the ATI catalyst control centre has no option, jsut a webpage. (Looks like this: http://imgur.com/kYkJN8q ) Now I may be wrong but on previous computers it had more options.
    I'm at a loss now as to how to get my computer to use the TI card, so if anyone has any suggestions they would be extremely welcome.
    As a second issue the intel graphics chipset drivers won't install, instead I get this message at the end of installation:
    "This computer does not meet the mim=nimum requirements for installing this software"

    Disable GDM and see if you can boot into the basic system.
    As the IG and BG suggest, it's best to reboot just after installing the basic system. When it comes time to install X, take baby steps, testing and rebooting as necessary.

  • Nvidia card giving me same trouble as Ati card

    Okay, originally I was using a Radeon 9500 Pro video card.  The problem was that anything OGL accelerated completely froze my system; I couldn't run glxgears without it freezing.  I tried and tried and tried to find a solution to the problem, using the open source drivers v. proprietary ones, minimal xorg.conf files, whatever.  Nothing worked.  Same symptoms on Ubuntu and Arch.  Since I was dual booting with Windows, I tried the card on Windows; it worked fine with any 3d application (I even tried Planet Penguin Racer so I could use the same game on each OS.  Windows could handle it, Linux froze as soon as the game booted up everytime.)
    So I ordered an Nvidia 6200 to hopefully remedy the problem because I assumed it was a video driver problem.  I installed the card, pacman'd the nvidia drivers, generated a xorg.conf and rebooted.  I made it to the desktop and typed glxinfo into the console.  I had direct rendering and everything seemed to be okay.  I ran glxgears.  1600fps, 1600fps, 1600fps... boom, my computer went back to KDM.  Uh oh.  I logged back in and ran glxgears again, except this time it hard froze JUST LIKE my Ati card.  Big uh oh.  I powered down and powered back on (because alt-ctrl-backspace couldn't kill X) and logged in again.  I tried to watch a video file, and it rebooted my machine.  At least my Ati card let me do that safely.  I tried again just to double check myself, and sure enough my computer FROZE again, it didn't just reboot.  Now here I am, out of options.
    Obviously there is something wrong with my machine somewhere, whether it be buried deep within Linux or my motherboard or god knows where else.  What I want to know is how I can diagnose this problem?  I'm not going back to Windows, there are too many reasons for me to stay in Linux (most are for development reasons as I'm a CS major, but the media applications are way better in Linux too.)
    In summary, is there anything I can do to remedy or diagnose my problem?  This is very frustrating... I can't afford a new computer to 'start over' and buy hardware that I KNOW is compatible. 
    Edit/Update:  I reinstalled my Ati card because I'm going to RMA the Nvidia one.  I've got a working xorg.conf file (at least, it can connect to the Xserver).  However, it always freezes when I load KDE, before it even makes it past that loading bar and to the desktop.  I don't know what causes it, but I do know that I can run TWM without it crashing AND I have direct rendering.  Any ideas how I can remedy this?
    Here is the xorg.conf, btw.  Just in case.
    Section "ServerLayout"
    Identifier "X.org Configured"
    Screen 0 "aticonfig-Screen[0]" 0 0
    InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer"
    InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard"
    EndSection
    Section "Files"
    ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/misc"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/100dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/75dpi:unscaled"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/TTF"
    FontPath "/usr/share/fonts/Type1"
    EndSection
    Section "Module"
    Load "glx"
    Load "dri"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Keyboard0"
    Driver "kbd"
    EndSection
    Section "InputDevice"
    Identifier "Mouse0"
    Driver "mouse"
    Option "Protocol" "auto"
    Option "Device" "/dev/input/mice"
    Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
    Option "VendorName" "ATI Proprietary Driver"
    Option "ModelName" "Generic Autodetecting Monitor"
    Option "DPMS" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Device[0]"
    Driver "fglrx"
    VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc"
    BoardName "Radeon 9500 Pro"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
    Identifier "aticonfig-Screen[0]"
    Device "aticonfig-Device[0]"
    Monitor "aticonfig-Monitor[0]"
    DefaultDepth 24
    SubSection "Display"
    Viewport 0 0
    Depth 24
    Modes "1280x1024" "1024x768" "800x600"
    EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "DRI"
    Mode 0666
    EndSection
    Last edited by The Orange Peanut (2008-04-08 21:51:43)

    I had this on my desktop - I had switched from ATI to NVIDIA and as a result, all my 3d/videos kept freezing or crashing - turns out it was a conflict with the libGL libraries. I had some wrongly-linked files left over.
    You could try removing mesa (which shouldn't be on your system), and reinstalling the nvidia driver, and checking the system for any stray libGL.so.* libraries.

  • ATI card not recognised

    Hi all
    I have New Macbook Pro 15inch bought 2 months ago. I upgraded to new OSX Lion however I just noticed that the ATI card does not have a display attached to it and the computer is running on the built in Intel Graphics. As a result the animations have become really choppy. Is there any way to get the ATI card recognised? Why does it not have a display connected to it? I haven't done anything to the computer except for the official updates.
    please help
    Amit

    Resolved the issue: Energy saver option automatically shifts the graphics performance to intel builtin chip.

  • ATI card image on display at restart

    Maybe someone else has seen this.
    The machine has a ATI 9800 128 from ATI. The card has been replaced by ATI for various reasons other than this.
    This last replacement card works perfect untill I have to do a software update that requires me to do a restart. On restart I get a card image of the card with the external power leads to the molex connector blinking red and the OS does not load.
    I checked the voltage on the connector and all of the voltages are there and are right on spec. The fan on the card is running.
    If I shut the machine down and power up the next day everything is ok untill the next restart.
    The machine has no issues with the OEM ATI 9000 card even on restart.
    ATI says its an Apple problem.
    Apple says the machine has no issues with the OEM ATI card. (Will not test the machine with the updated ATI 9800 128 card)
    Does anyone know what card image of the card with the external power leads to the molex connector blinking red really means?

    Supposed to mean a lack of good/clean +12VDC at the molex connector or could be flaky components in the DC-DC conversion on the board( ie bad voltage regulator or capacitors ).

  • Bootcamp, XP, ATI card & Stalker: Shadow of Chernobyl

    I recently purchased S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Shadow of Chernobyl to play on XP on my Mac Pro
    While I've read LOTS of posts on other sites about how buggy this game is, my concern (and my reason for posting here) is that the game seems to push my ATI card to the limit. The fan is on full blast, and the temp soars into the high 90s (I have ATItool monitoring the GPU temp in XP).
    Now, I've played hours of Doom 3 and never had this problem. My question isn't about the game itself so much (it seems to have enough issues of its own) - but really - are there others who are having cooling issues with this ATI card? Is the Mac Pro case design not right for it? Is there some other option to help keep the temp down on this card? What should I do? I want to play this fantastic game, but I don't want to melt my ATI card!!
    Thanks in advance for any thoughts...

    Hey there,
    I too just recently got S.T.A.L.K.E.R. and I run it on my Mac Pro via Boot Camp and an ATI X1900.
    Honestly, I haven't got into it very far (busy playing Bioshock....), and I don't have ATITool or similar way of checking GPU temps (but I think I will just to make sure), but I don't ever recall my ATI card going full blast with the fan cooler during gameplay. But it dose rev up real loud when I first boot my Mac Pro. I definitely hear it then; like a shop vac or something.
    I believe I push my card pretty hard. It's overclocked (from Apple's spec's anyway...) via firmware and I run Bioshock at 1900x1200 with all settings at max for hours at a time and I never hear my card sound like it does when it first boots.
    However, once I saw my Northbridge temps rise up to 170F in OSX. Scared the bejesus out of me. Since then, I use software to jack up the speed of the front fans and now my NB temps don't ever get much over 120F. I'm sure this helps the ATI card also.
    That, and I regularly use canned air to keep dust from building up on the card. The X1900 seems like a sticky magnet for dust....
    Hope that helps.

  • ATI Card Radeon 9600 Pro freeze problem

    I've got some problems with this drivers...
    My card is: ATI Card Radeon 9600 Pro
    Kernel: 2.6.15-ARCH
    Installation (or compliation) of this package goes very well
    My xorg.conf looks like
    Section "Module"
    Load "dbe" # Double buffer extension
    SubSection "extmod"
    Option "omit xfree86-dga" # don't initialise the DGA extension
    EndSubSection
    Load "type1"
    Load "freetype"
    Load "glx" # libglx.a
    Load "dri" # libdri.a
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "ATI Graphics Adapter"
    Driver "fglrx"
    # ### generic DRI settings ###
    # === disable PnP Monitor ===
    #Option "NoDDC"
    # === disable/enable XAA/DRI ===
    Option "no_accel" "no"
    Option "no_dri" "no"
    # === misc DRI settings ===
    Option "mtrr" "off" # disable DRI mtrr mapper, driver has its own code for mtrr
    # ### FireGL DDX driver module specific settings ###
    # === Screen Management ===
    Option "DesktopSetup" "(null)"
    Option "ScreenOverlap" "0"
    Option "GammaCorrectionI" "0x06419064"
    Option "GammaCorrectionII" "0x06419064"
    # === OpenGL specific profiles/settings ===
    Option "Capabilities" "0x00000000"
    Option "CapabilitiesEx" "0x00000000"
    # === Video Overlay for the Xv extension ===
    Option "VideoOverlay" "on"
    # === OpenGL Overlay ===
    # Note: When OpenGL Overlay is enabled, Video Overlay
    # will be disabled automatically
    Option "OpenGLOverlay" "off"
    # === Center Mode (Laptops only) ===
    Option "CenterMode" "off"
    # === Pseudo Color Visuals (8-bit visuals) ===
    Option "PseudoColorVisuals" "off"
    # === QBS Management ===
    Option "Stereo" "off"
    Option "StereoSyncEnable" "1"
    # === FSAA Management ===
    Option "FSAAEnable" "no"
    Option "FSAAScale" "1"
    Option "FSAADisableGamma" "no"
    Option "FSAACustomizeMSPos" "no"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX0" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY0" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX1" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY1" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX2" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY2" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX3" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY3" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX4" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY4" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosX5" "0.000000"
    Option "FSAAMSPosY5" "0.000000"
    # === Misc Options ===
    Option "AGPMode" "8"
    Option "UseFastTLS" "0"
    Option "BlockSignalsOnLock" "on"
    Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "no"
    Option "ForceGenericCPU" "no"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0" # vendor=1002, device=4150
    Screen 0
    EndSection
    But here the horror begins... Any time I switch to virtual console (Alt+Ctrl+Fn), then goes back to X and try to move a window everything freeze except mouse. The only way out is hard reset. By the way, I've notcied that it happens when loading "dri" module. But without "dri" there is no direct rendering. Is there any way to have "dri" and non-freezeing X-server?

    Ive got nearly the same problem:
    Maybe its a bug in combination of the ATI drivers and the Kernel 2.6.15
    See following thread:
    http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=18456
    phxx

  • Anyone have an ATI card that can confirm if QuickTime H2.64 works?

    Can anyone that has an ATI card (not nVidia) running on Windows XP and DirectX 9 confirm that QuickTime movies encoded in H.264 play inside a browser without crashing the browser?
    For me and many others, QuickTime movies that are encoded in H.264 and embedded into web pages are crashing the browser when trying to view. I am trying to determine if my nVidia card (nVidia drivers) are the source of the problem or if it is DirectX 9 or just simply the latest QuickTime version.
    Also, is there anyone with an nVidia card on Windows Vista (DirectX 10) that can confirm if QuickTime H.264 movies work inside browsers?

    I should know by Saturday when I install Nvidia 8600 GTS under x64 version how it works - though I must say that everything I've been reading doesn't convince me it is a wise idea to install QuickTime under Vista x64 just yet. :-<

  • 2x ATI cards, 2x dual-link monitors. How to make it work?

    As per the subject, I have 2 ATI cards, they both seem to be detected/initialised by the kernel OK on bootup and are listed in lspci. I need two cards as I want to power two large displays which require dual-link dvi connections.
    I can see from the X.org log that X only detects one of the cards, even if I specify two device sections with the relevant busID of each card in the xorg.conf. X just seems to complete ignore it. I'm using the open source radeon driver with an up-to-date arch system.  This has been driving me crazy for a couple of weeks now, to the point where I'm considering getting another PC to use to power the second screen!!
    LSPCI section:
    01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman PRO [Radeon HD 6950]
    01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
    02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman PRO [Radeon HD 6950]
    02:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
    Device section from xorg:
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Card0"
    Driver "radeon"
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
    Identifier "Card1"
    Driver "radeon"
    BusID "PCI:2:0:0"
    EndSection
    I think the key to this is getting X to load the driver for the second graphics card, then I can configure it with xrandr - but I haven't got a clue how to do this... I'm guessing it's possible though??
    Thanks for any help!!
    Last edited by mrheh (2011-11-02 17:15:47)

    01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman XT [AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series]
    01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
    02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Cayman XT [AMD Radeon HD 6900 Series]
    02:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc Device aa80
    /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-monitor.conf
    Section "Monitor"
        Identifier    "Monitor0"
        Option        "Enable" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Monitor"
        Identifier    "Monitor1"
        Option        "Enable" "true"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
        Identifier    "Device0"
        Driver        "radeon"
        BusID        "PCI:1:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Device"
        Identifier    "Device1"
        Driver        "radeon"
        BusID        "PCI:2:0:0"
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
        Identifier    "Screen0"
        Device        "Device0"
        Monitor        "Monitor0"
        SubSection "Display"
            Depth    24
            Modes    "2560x1600"
        EndSubSection
    EndSection
    Section "Screen"
        Identifier    "Screen1"
        Device        "Device1"
        Monitor        "Monitor1"
        SubSection "Display"
            Depth     24
            Modes    "2560x1600"
        EndSubSection
    EndSection   
    Section "ServerLayout"
        Identifier    "My Server"
        Screen        0    "Screen0"    0    0
        Screen        1    "Screen1"    RightOf    "Screen0"
        Option         "Xinerama"    "1"
    EndSection

  • HW acceleration problem with ATI cards

    Hello all. This is my first post here
    I have noticed the following issue/problem and would like your feedback about it.
    We have a lot of intel macs here at the office (15 macs).
    Most of them are intel imacs using ATI graphics.
    We also have an intel macmini with a nvidia 9400 graphics card, a macbook pro 17inch, core 2 duo with nvidia graphics etc.
    My personal macs are:
    1) a macpro 1.1 (upgraded to 2.1) with (upgraded) 2 x5365 xeon cpus @ 3ghz (8 core machine), 10GB ram, ΑΤΙ HD 4870 1GB, INTEL 80GB G2 SSD ...
    2) an imac 2.93Ghz i7 27inch, with 16GB RAM and an ATI 5xxx card (i do not remember the exact model, i think it is the 5770 card as a successor to the 4850 card).
    I have noticed the following issue on ALL the macs i have access to: whichever mac runs nvidia card, irrespective of the specification of both the nvidia card and its cpu, has hw acceleration working properly when browsing the web.
    For example, if i visit these links:
    http://demos.hacks.mozilla.org/openweb/HWACCEL/
    http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/Default.html
    and i run the respective test on any of the macs we have here equipped with an ATI card i get slow frame rates, ie. on my macpro, with a dual monitor setup 2560x1600 (apple 30inch) and 1680x1050 (apple cinema display) i get 20s FPS when running the tests and this is only when using safari.
    The same applies when running these tests on my imac i7 as well as on all other macs that are running ATI hardware.
    On the contrary if i run the tests on a mac which is equipped with a nvidia card i get (depending on how old the hardware is) 50+ or even 60+ FPS.
    I do know that things are complicated with hw acceleration on OS X Lion and in particular when browsing the internet (partially working hw acceleration) but why the difference between ATI and NVIDIA?
    All drivers .kext files are original and not patched.
    When running benchmarks, the results appear on par with similar systems.
    Of course all of our macs are running OS X Lion, latest version with latest updates installed.
    Also cleared safari cache (by manually deleting the cache.db file as well), disabled all of the plug-ins, installed latest version of adobe flash, to no avail.
    I just want to know why there is different hw acceleration behaviour when running a NVIDIA instead of an ATI card on OS X LION.
    From a practical perspective i think this is why sometimes when i browse the web i have excessively cpu utilization even on powerful systems (i7, 8core macpro etc) running ATI hardware.
    Please excuse my English, it is not my main language

    UPDATE:
    After reading here http://betanews.com/2012/02/10/google-releases-chrome-18-beta-get-it-now/
    i just tried the Google Chrome Beta v 18.0.1025.11 and i saw a dramatic difference. On a 2560x1600 screen i am now getting on this test (http://demos.hacks.mozilla.org/openweb/HWACCEL/ ) approximately 40+ FPS. Nevertheless my question still stands: why people with NVIDIA cards on a mac do not have this problem?

  • Snow Leopard and ATI cards

    I have a 800 MHz RAM bus mac pro (a 2008 model). It shipped with an ATI Radeon 2600XT graphics card (and OSX Leopard 10.5). I then upgraded to a SECOND graphics card which is the NVIDIA 8800GT. With Leopard OS the two cards played nicely together.
    However, after upgrading to 10.6 the ATI card no longer works properly.
    booting 10.6 in 64 bit kernel (the default) with the ATI card installed is un-successful (with the ATI card in the machine, it WILL NOT BOOT.)
    My suspicion is that the ATI firmware does not support the 64bit kernel because when I boot the mac pro in 32 bit kernel mode the machine boots and the ATI card is recognized (displayed in system profiler: BUT DOES NOT OUTPUT VIDEO!) When reverting and booting from 10.5 (anyway a 32bit kernel system) the machine boots EXTREMELY SLOW and the ATI card is visible BUT NOT USABLE. When shutting down the computer (in verbose mode) I get about 12 screens of ATI debugging codes before the machine powers off (this all flies by very very quickly).
    I see on the apple support downloads an updater called:
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Firmware Update
    HOWEVER, the installer will not let me install this update even when I do get my machine booted in Leopard with the card installed, because it tells me I need the Leopard Graphics Update (it's a 10.5.8 system...) ***?
    when i completely remove the NVIDIA card from the computer and attempt to ONLY use the ATI card, nothing works. NADA.
    Is my only chance to get 4 video outputs from this machine to buy a second 8800GT?
    I know that the ATI card is not fried, but that there is a driver or firmware problem. how can I fix this issue? thanks in advance,
    |K<

    ATI 2600XT is an iffy card.
    Early shipped models of that card had a firmware update, newer cards were 'fixed' and didn't need the firmware update. Firmware only seemed to make its fans run more and be louder and was annoying.
    A lot of things happened with 10.6.4 and graphics. Even video out issue. Some have downgraded to 10.6.3.
    There are 4 other options also:
    GT120 is cheap and fine
    8800GT is EOL and ebay only, and look for "2nd generation Apple Mac Pro"
    ATI 4870 or wait to see if Apple comes out with 5800s
    Nvidia GTX 285 ($450)
    Some cards require 2 power connectors, the GT120 does not need any.
    Wait for 10.6.5+ or downgrade to 10.6.3 and see how that works
    Mac Pro 2008 required an EFI on graphics cards to work with the UEFI/EFI64 so I am unsure that the card or its BIOS is an issue... but haven't seen much of that.
    10.5.2 era there was a Leopard Graphics 1.0 update that was rolled into 10.5.3.
    I'd ditch and get the GT120 or wait and see if GT3xx.

  • Problems with 10.5.4 or possible ATI card overheating

    Just upgraded to 10.5.4 but as soon as the computer restarts (i.e. about 5 minute), I am notified a kernel panic.
    It happened twice as I have two harddisk the first being the stock 320G and a new WD640AAKS. Mind you, both drive runs well with 10.5.1 all the way through 10.5.3. Anyone else got this problem? One thing I noticed though is that the fan on the ATI card never spin. (i.e. from boot till kernel panic) Is that a problem? I never really pay attention to is until I tried to reinstall the OS (perfectly fine) then upgrade to 10.5.4 (blue screen then reboot and 1 min after kernel panic). Perhaps I would try again to check if the fan is on when I am running 10.5.1.
    Any suggestion as very much welcome as I can only use my laptop to do my work now.
    Thanks

    I am having the same problem which only started after i installed the firmware update. soemtime the computer wont even go past the blue screen but when it does the kernal panic usually only take about 10 mins to come up.
    This is what is says in the panic log
    Tue Jul 8 18:49:09 2008
    panic(cpu 0 caller 0x001A8CD4): Kernel trap at 0x00b38127, type 14=page fault, registers:
    CR0: 0x8001003b, CR2: 0x00000000, CR3: 0x00ff1000, CR4: 0x00000660
    EAX: 0x00000000, EBX: 0x00000036, ECX: 0x0b99e0d4, EDX: 0x0001a9c8
    CR2: 0x00000000, EBP: 0x00108b18, ESI: 0x0c079920, EDI: 0x00108ff0
    EFL: 0x00010006, EIP: 0x00b38127, CS: 0x00000008, DS: 0x00000010
    Error code: 0x00000000
    Backtrace, Format - Frame : Return Address (4 potential args on stack)
    0x108918 : 0x12b0fa (0x4592a4 0x10894c 0x133243 0x0)
    0x108968 : 0x1a8cd4 (0x46280c 0xb38127 0xe 0x461fbc)
    0x108a48 : 0x19ede5 (0x108a60 0x108a74 0x108b18 0xb38127)
    0x108a58 : 0xb38127 (0xe 0x73aa0048 0x10 0x10)
    0x108b18 : 0xb38c6e (0x0 0x2f 0x12 0x0)
    0x108b58 : 0xb38dd3 (0x0 0x0 0x0 0x51f6e8)
    0x108cb8 : 0xb38f31 (0x1 0x4 0xb43a48 0x0)
    0x108cf8 : 0xb38d4f (0x4 0xb43a48 0x0 0x0)
    0x108d38 : 0xb2d3e9 (0xb44f0c 0xb459e0 0x0 0x0)
    0x108d98 : 0xb265dc (0xbde5c10 0x108e58 0x1 0x1)
    0x108dd8 : 0xb28b92 (0xbde5c10 0xb4b0fc 0x108e58 0x40)
    0x108e08 : 0xb28bc7 (0xbde5c10 0x8 0x108e58 0x0)
    0x108e38 : 0xb257e5 (0xbde5c10 0x8 0x108e58 0xb639000)
    0x108ea8 : 0xb34a30 (0xbde5c10 0xb49594 0x34990 0x422cab)
    0x108ed8 : 0xb0f0d7 (0xb936954 0x9727c980 0xd 0xb49594)
    0x108f08 : 0x6c3a0d (0xc079920 0x36 0x6b287000 0x0)
    Backtrace continues...
    Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies):
    com.apple.kext.ATY_Lamna(5.2.8)@0xad9000->0xb52fff
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport(1.5.2)@0x6b9000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x68d000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily(1.5.2)@0x69d000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily(1.2.0)@0x633000
    com.apple.iokit.IONDRVSupport(1.5.2)@0x6b9000->0x6c6fff
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily(2.4.1)@0x68d000
    dependency: com.apple.iokit.IOGraphicsFamily(1.5.2)@0x69d000
    BSD process name corresponding to current thread: kernel_task
    Mac OS version:
    9E17
    Kernel version:
    Darwin Kernel Version 9.4.0: Mon Jun 9 19:30:53 PDT 2008; root:xnu-1228.5.20~1/RELEASE_I386
    System model name: MacPro3,1 (Mac-F42C88C8)
    any ideas?

  • MOVED: K8Tneo2/Winchester 3200 - ATI card?

    This topic has been moved to Off-Topic Technical.
    K8Tneo2/Winchester 3200 - ATI card?

    Nope. Minecraft seems to run fine, albeit quite slowly:
    https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7122698/bbs_ar … pyface.png
    Cinnamon screenshot: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7122698/bbs_ar … adface.png
    The rendering errors at the bottom border of the "Cinnamon Settings" window and the white boxes between the chromium tabs. These are more or less permanent, they stay there until the window is destroyed, and reappear quickly after the window is first rendered. The white noise looking things on the chromium window stay there until the window repaints itself. Moving the chromium window causes the white noise to start flickering.
    The screen froze when I opened a nautilus window and tried to resize it. Xorg.0.log doesn't mention any errors.
    This doesn't happen in Cinnamon 2D, so I assume it has something to do with the OpenGL implementation.
    Forcing 7600M by adding
    BusID "PCI:1:0:0"
    to
    /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-radeon.cfg
    causes Xorg to not even start.
    I'm thinking that I've managed to improperly configure the drivers, although I don't see how.
    Screenshot from aur/doomsday running doom shareware: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/7122698/bbs_ar … s_good.png
    The .wad (data file containing all the game's assets) isn't corrupted. The engine itself might be, as the sprites are always corrupted in the same way. Note the barrel on the right side that has parts of a lower resolution version of itself (mipmapping) and blue armour, the light thingy in the middle that contains a lower resolution of itself and a shotgun ammo, and the pillar in the other room that is just not nice to look at. Moving away or towards the sprite (which effectively changes the mipmap level rendered) might make the sprite look as it is supposed to be.

  • [rs480M2-IL] MSI, Please Include Surround view support for NON ATI cards

    As stated in the topic, don't see why it cannot be done, besides an ATI marketting tool to increase sales of their own cards.
    the on board gfx and additional PCI-E card should be operating independently of each other, why restrict us to using ATI cards ?
    thank you .

    As stated in the Forum Rules we are not MSI. We are users helping users. All requests like that need to be directed towards MSI in the email listed in the link I gave you.
    Have Fun
    Jeremy

Maybe you are looking for