N8 - Same widget, multiple instance.

Hi,
I use a Nokia N8 with firmware updated to the latest Nokia Belle Refresh. I recently installed a .gif animator widget that adds an animated image to the homescreen. It works perfectly, though I was wondering if I could add the same widget again to add another animated image to the home screen but it doesn't show up in the 'Add Widgets' menu. When I remove the existing widget from the homescreen, it appears in the menu. But once I add it to any homescreen, it doesn't appear on the menu anymore.
Please let me know if there is a way to add the widget more than once to the same homescreen.

Hi,
As you have found out, if a widget can only be loaded once it will not be available in he list when you try to add another instance.
Press the 'Accept As Solution' icon if I have solved your problem, click on the Star Icon below if my advice has helped you!

Similar Messages

Multiple instances of the same APEX application under SSO

Currently we have several applications that are authenticated through Oracle SSO. The apps are authenticating correctly, but I can't be in multiple instances of the same application without having to re-validate through SSO when I move between instances.
Scenario: I'm successfully signed into my "parent" application, app_id 1 through SSO. I click a custom link that opens the "child" application (app_id 2) to view widget "A". When the page is launched I see the usual "Redirecting to the Login Server for authentication" message (verifying that I'm signed in through SSO) and then it succeeds and takes me into app 2, displaying widget A. I click the next link to launch another instance of app 2 with a different APEX session id for viewing widget "B". This also passes through SSO and redirects me into app 2, displaying widget B as expected. But now if I go back to navigate anywhere on widget A in my first instance, it has to go back through the "Redirecting to Login Server." This now means the widget A window is valid, but the widget B window will have to redirect next time I use it (back & forth & so on...)
So my question I suppose is: Is it possible/good practice to allow a single user to open multiple separate instances of the same APEX application using different APEX session_ids viewing different data under Oracle Enterprise SSO?
Guesstimation: It seems like there must be a switch somewhere in SSO that says "allow multiple application instances yes/no"...but my problem may be APEX itself, or how SSO is tied into APEX... Sorry for the super-generic example, I'm not exactly sure where I should be looking to resolve this, and the closest similar problem I found on the forums was here: login to application twice in two seperate IE windows clears other login

reset your dock preferences. delete the file homedirectory/library/preferences/com.apple.dock.plist and log out/in. your dock, spaces and exposé will be reset to the defaults. see if the problem goes away.

How do I prevent a user from opening multiple instances on the same computer?

On the site oldnavyweekly.com there is a .swf that prevents users from opening multiple instances of the site at the same time on the same computer. If you open the site, and try to open it a second time in another window, it won't load. You can't open the site again until the first window is closed. How did they implement this?
From my analysis it is NOT:
1. Cookies - The block still takes place if you try opening it in IE and also try opening it in Firefox simultaneously.
2. Flash Cookies - The block still takes place if I disable flash cookies.
3. IP Based Block - You are not blocked if you open the site on two separate computers with the same outbound IP address. From my analysis, their server does not assist in the block at all.
It seems as if their .swf is creating some kind of global system-wide object that can be detected in other instances of the application on the same machine. How did they implement this?
Thanks!

you're welcome.
actually, unless you take an extra step, the first opened swf will close. if you want the 2nd to close, the initial receiving lc will send a message to sender that causes the sender to close.

Multiple instance of same mac on network

Hello,
Running OS X Yosemite, I've noticed multiple instances of the same mac appearing on my home network. Has anyone else encountered this and know of a way to fix it? Currently, I have to try more than one instance before I find the "correct" icon to connect.

10.10.1, when I posted. Last night I installed 10.10.2. It got hung up on the "Restarting..." (w/App Store logo) screen for over 2 hrs, so I let it run overnight. It was still stuck in the morning so I just shut it down. After restarting, everything looks fine (cautiously optimistic)! There is only ONE instance on the network!! I read some tips in other forums and the simplest one I used, which wouldn't do more harm than good, was to turn off my air printer during the reboot. I am good for now and will repost if the problem returns. William Lloyd how long since you updated have you been multiple-instance-free?

How can I open multiple instances of the same version of FF?

I understand that if I have multiple profiles, I can run different versions of FF side-by-side (like 3.6 and 4).
However, what I'm interested in is how I can launch multiple instances of the same version of FF (4, for instance) using the same profile. In other words, I want to be able to double-click the desktop icon for FF, and open a new instance, and keep doing that as many times as I want. I don't want to have a different icon and profile for each instance (too much overhead to keep a dozen+ profiles in sync).
I can always launch one FF window instance, and then keep clicking ctrl+N to launch new instances from inside it, which they all share the same profile (as I want). So, basically, I want to be able to do that from my desktop icon, rather than by having to do it with the keyboard ctrl+N sequence.

But I don't understand why whatever Firefox does when you click ctrl+N can't also be done (with some sort of command-line switch) from a desktop icon?
In other words, I clearly can create many FF instances (even if they are the same FF.exe process) by doing ctrl+n a bunch of times. Why then can't this behavior be done from a desktop icon with some parameters?
As far as I know, FF is the only browser that doesn't directly allow multiple browser instances from desktop icons. IE, Chrome, Safari, Opera, etc... all let me launch a new instance (even if they are all single process and the instances are shared within the process).

How to create multiple instances within same AS

Ramesh,
I have a unique problem. I might have to create B2B instances for 4 owners. As in BPEL, I can have separate domains for the 4 clients in the same instance; what is the equivalent in B2B?
I have a limited number of CPUs and need to install the instances on the same box and hence trying to be creative yet secure here.
Could you please provide some pointers.
Thanks
Shamik

Hello Shamik,
Please elaborate your use case. Is this just caters to user management or to really have different domain like bpel for four different users. Please see, b2b do not have the notion of BPEL domain, you might have to install multiple instances of B2B pointing to the same MR.
Rgds,Ramesh

Cant open external links and multiple instances of the same profile.

I have multiple firefox profiles.
I constantly have two profiles running at the same time.
I use microsoft outlook and see an external link, I click it wishing firefox to open it in the default or new browser. It does not and says "FIrefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system."
Firefox is running fine.
How can I open external links with a profile based setup?
Also, how can I open multiple instances of the same profile? I find that if I click and drag a tab to another monitor, it opens a new "instance" or browser window.

You say
''I have multiple firefox profiles. <br />
I constantly have two profiles running at the same time. ''
So you will have discovered ''-no-remote'' Note NOT to use that on the default browser; profile, only on secondary profiles.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_in_use#Common_causes
You will NOT be able to open multiple instances of the same profile, clone the profile if necessary.
If you are trying to run multiple Webmail accounts in one profile then you may well find the webmail is identifying and setting the user account that is opened. Use a Private Browsing window to get round that and open a second account.
* [[Private Browsing - Browse the web without saving information about the sites you visit]]

Multiple instances of the same bean class in session?

I�m trying to think of a way to have multiple instances of the same bean class in session scope using JSF. For example, let�s say that I have two <h:dataTable>s on the same page. They both use the backing bean called genericBean. Now, the content for genericBean will be different for each <h:dataTable>. In fact, the data source that backs genericBean is not known until runtime. It could be a database, web service, etc.
What I would like is for when JSF needs access genericBean instead of looking for the value with key �genericBean� in the session map it looks for �genericBean_[some runtime ID]�. I could specify this id in EL on a custom component, as a request parameter or whatever.
I think that I need the bean to be in session scope because the tables are complex and I want them to be editable.
I have some ideas about how I can do this but I was wondering if someone has already solved this problem or if there is a standard way to do this using tools like Shale, etc.
Thanks,
Randy

Well, I came up with an interesting solution to this so I thought that I would post it here.
I have a page that looks like this.
<html>
<head>
<title>My Page</title>
</head>
<body>
<f:view>
<f:subview id="component1">
<jsp:include page="component.jsp">
<jsp:param name="id" value="a" />
</jsp:include>
</f:subview>
<hr>
<f:subview id="component2">
<jsp:include page="component.jsp">
<jsp:param name="id" value="b" />
</jsp:include>
</f:subview>
</f:view>
</body>
</html>
And component.jsp looke like this.
<f:verbatim>
<p>
<h1>Component
</f:verbatim>
<h:outputText value=" #{param.id}" />
<f:verbatim>
</h1>
</p>
</f:verbatim>
<h:form>
<h:outputText value="#{component.id}" />
<h:outputText value="#{component.value}" />
<h:commandButton value="increment" action="#{component.increment}" />
<h:commandButton value="decrement" action="#{component.decrement}" />
<f:verbatim>
<input type="hidden" name="id"
value="</f:verbatim><h:outputText value="#{param.id}"/><f:verbatim>" />
</f:verbatim>
</h:form>
The idea is that I want component.jsp to be initialized differently based on the id param. The component managed bean is configured to be in session scope but I want the component instance for id a and id b to be different instances in session scope. Therefore, I added a custom variable resolver to handle this.
public Object resolveVariable(FacesContext context, String name) {
// This id will be different for the different subviews.
HttpServletRequest request = (HttpServletRequest) context.getExternalContext() .getRequest();
String id = request.getParameter("id");
// If there is an id in the request then check if this is a bean that can have multiple
// instances in session scope.
if ((id != null) && (id.length() > 0)) {
ExternalContext ec = context.getExternalContext();
// Build the new name for the key of this bean
String newName = name + "_" + id;
Object value = null;
// See if the bean instance already esists.
if ((null == (value = ec.getRequestMap().get(newName))) &&
(null == (value = ec.getSessionMap().get(newName))) &&
(null == (value = ec.getApplicationMap().get(newName)))) {
     // We could not find the bean instance in scope so create the bean
     // using the standard variable resolver.
value = original.resolveVariable(context, name);
// Now check if the bean implements that page component interface. If it is
// a page component then we want to rename the key to access this bean so
// that the instance is only used when the id is provided in the request.
// For example, if there are two components (a and b) we will have in session scope
// component_a and component_b. The will each point to a unique instance of the
// Component bean class.
if (value instanceof PageComponent) {
// Try to get the value again
if (null != (value = ec.getRequestMap().get(name))) {
     // Initialize the bean using the id
((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
ec.getRequestMap().remove(name);
ec.getRequestMap().put(newName, value);
} else if (null != (value = ec.getSessionMap().get(name))) {
((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
ec.getSessionMap().remove(name);
ec.getSessionMap().put(newName, value);
} else if (null != (value = ec.getApplicationMap().get(name))) {
((PageComponent) value).initInstance(id);
ec.getApplicationMap().remove(name);
ec.getApplicationMap().put(newName, value);
return value;
return original.resolveVariable(context, name);
}

How can i run multiple instances of Photoshop EXE at the same time on windows 7

Alright. You may ask why do you need multiple ?
Assume that i have 10000 PSD files in 10 different folders
I have a script that just save as them as PNG
And these files are each 3000x3000 px
My computer has 8 cores and 1 photoshop exe is only using 1 cpu core
Also i have SSD raid system it has 750 mb read write per second
So right now i am wasting my time with running only 1 photoshop exe instead of at least 4

I'm not aware of a way to run multiple instances or different versions of photoshop at the same time on windows.
Assuming of course they are all installed on the same operating system.
On mac versions you can running two different versions of photoshop at the same time, but i don't think that's possible on windows where it
appears that only one version of photoshop can run at a time.

Best practice for multiple instances of the same BEX query

Hi there,
I'm wondering what's the best way to use multiple instances of the same BEX query. Let me explain what I mean:
I have a dashboard with different queries feeding different period of time such as: week to date, month to date and so on. One query for each since it is based on a user exit.
For each query I want to show different data in different sections of my dashboard. Per example: sales per directors or sales per customer group, sales per day, sales per week and the like.I tried to connect a simple bar chart via a direct connection but with no success due to the multiple lines generated by the addition of the sales director, customer group, week number and so on.
My question is about the way to connect the different queries efficiently in order to show the different data while avoiding multiple useless lines.
The image above shows the query browser where, per example, for a Month to date query there will be mutiple line for each week as well as one line for each director. If, for two different components, I want to show data per week and data per director or other representation what is the best practice:
Add another instance of the same query and only put the week information and another one will only the director info?
Should I bind those to the excel file and use formulas to make final calculations?
Will there be a performance issues for adding different instances of the same query
I have 6 different queries (read 6 user exit that filters time via user exit).
Depending on the best practices there might be 4 instances for each for a total of 24 instances in the query browser.
I hope my question is clear enough, if not please do not hesitate I'll clarify as much as possible.
Regards,
Steve

Hi Steve,
Might be trying for solution for a long time, If i understood your question clear let me clarify you few points.
You are trying to access the bex query which is designed with the exit's in the background based on the logic and trying to call the entire dimensions and key-figures in a single connection. Then you are trying to map those data in the charts.
Steve, try to make more connections based upon the logic and split them. use the same query but split them by sales per customer group, sales per day, sales per week by making three different connections and try. You can merge the prompts from all connections.
Hope this Helps!!!
Sorry if i misunderstood your question.
--SumanT

Stop opening multiple instances of the same application

I am used to having graphic files on my desktop, when editing one I would simply right-click and pick "open with" > Photoshop (which is always open in its own desktop in my computer). Now out of the blue, if I do that, it loads another instance of Photoshop, which is certainly what I don't want. I can have 2, 3, 4 Photoshops running at the same time and editing the same image!
Any idea how to solve this? I searched but all I could find is people wanting the opposite i.e. opening multiple instances of the same app.

Your best bet to prevent this is to detach or unmount this drive; however, you can also try resetting your Mac's launch services, to have it re-scan only the Applications folders on your boot drive for programs to associate with documents and services you are using. Running the following command in the OS X Terminal will kill the current launch services database (its long, but copy and paste the entire line):
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/Support/lsregister -kill
Following this, run the following command to seed the database with the apps you currently have installed:
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Versions/A/Frameworks/LaunchServices.framework/Versions/A/Support/lsregister -seed
Note that these changes will only apply when opening documents that have not been specifically assigned to a program. If you find a specific document continues to open the program on the external drive, then you can get info on it and change the associated program in the "Open With" section of the info window. After doing this, you might need to re-run these commands above, as opening the program will register it with OS X's launch services and have it now be available for automatically handling other documents.

Opening multiple instances of the same vi

Hi,
I am having trouble opening multiple instances of the same vi.
This vi that I am trying to create can be used like a message display window to display numbers, strings etc (just like labVIEW's display message control except that this vi will update the displayed controls every scan). So for example, I will like to have a subvi, lets call it popup.vi, where I wire in three inputs from my main vi (2 strings and 1 number). Now in my main.vi I have 2 numeric controls Num1 and Num2 with their KeyFocus property nodes.
The intention is that when I select Num1 or Num2 numeric control with my mouse the KeyFocus boolean becomes true and the popup.vi logic kicks in. Meaning that the popup.vi runs and opens its front pane
l displaying the two strings and one numeric value from the main.vi.
The problem arises when I want to open and run multiple instances of the popup.vi.
So when I click on Num1 with my mouse I want the popup.vi to open its front panel with a set of strings and number displayed. At the same time I would want to click on Num2 control and open another instance of the popup.vi with another set of strings and numeric value.
Also, I saved the popup.vi as popup.vit but for some reason vi server will not open the popup.vit. I get a message that popup.vit is already in memory - cannot load.
I have attached a sample of the main.vi and popup.vi program.
Please let me know if you need further clarifications.
I appreciate your help in this matter.
Thanks
Nish
Attachments:
popupVI.zip ‏37 KB

You have to clone the VI. You say you have tried to use the .vit way of cloning...but in the example there is no use of VIT and the VI is called statically. If you want to open multiple instances of the same VI and the VI has a user interface (or needs to be a unique instance of the VI every time even though it's called the same place in the diagram, not the case here though) you need to do it dynamically, i.e. with an invoke node.
There is actually a problem doing just that, it causes a memory leak...but that won't be a problem unless the VI is called frequently / the software will be running over very long periods of time. You can see an example of it here (attached to my reply to the question):
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&
RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000A07D0000&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=VI+cloning&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0
About the memory leak problem:
http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIVEID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000B7A40000&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_0=VI+cloning&USEARCHCONTEXT_QUESTION_S=0
MTO

Problem:Multiple instances of the same applet on a webpage...

I have an applet which connects to a server to read an XML-file.
I use Doucument to parse the XML-file like this:
String xmlurl="http://www.somesite.com/somexmlpage.php";
Document d =DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance().newDocumentBuilder().parse(xmlurl);
(...read the XML-file...)
This works fine.
However, I need multiple instances of the same applet running at the same time on the same webpage.
Now, with multiple applets running at the same time the parsing no loger works. If one applet is doing some parsing and a taskswitch takes place to let another applet run, the applet which is interrupted is not able to continue the parsing as it looses its "incoming data" when another applet reads from the server.
How can different applets affect each other like this?
And how can I fix the problem?
Thanks in advance for any help!!

However, I need multiple instances of the same applet running at the same time on the same webpage.
Why? But okay.Because the the different applets show information about different items.
Now, with multiple applets running at the same time the parsing no loger works. If one applet is doing some parsing and a
taskswitch takes place to let another applet run, the applet which is interrupted is not able to continue the
parsing as it looses its "incoming data" when another applet reads from the server.
How did you determine that's what's happening?By printing out debuginformation.
Each applet prints out a message (System.out.println) when it creates an instance of Document (ie. connects to the server) and the applet also prints out XML-information as the XML-file is processed.
But, actually, I was a bit quick in my first post; The applet doesen't neccesarily loose its "incoming data", but the parser looses the data it is parsing. I can download the data from the server first, and then start parsing it. If a taskswitch happens while one applet is parsing, it looses its data, even if the data is allready downloaded.
I see this since I see another applet making a printout, and when first applet starts again, the parser has lost track of its data.
It works fine if only one applet is running. And everything is fine until the next applets starts; I can see this from the printout.
Again, the appet prints out data as it parses the document. I see the next applet starting to work, and when the first one continues parsing again the printout shows that data is no longer there. It happens everytime the runtime switches to another applet, and it never happens if just one applet is running.
Googeling a little tells me that DocumentBuilder.parse() isn't thread-safe, but this shouldn't have anything to do with it, should it?
Each applet is a separate process, and not different threads in the same process, aren't they? (Not sure how the runtime treats multiple applets...)And secondly, the applets create their own instance of Document anyways.

Deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session EJB

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same stateless session bean, but specify a different JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single invocation, just that I need to hit different databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name, and have the exact same functionality, just against different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and trying to do something the "wrong way")
Nick

I have a stateless session bean.
The methods on the bean operate against DB tables.
Q: Can I deploy multiple instances of the same
stateless session bean, but specify a different
JNDI/datasource name in the deployment descriptor?
The method calls are all enclosed within a single
invocation, just that I need to hit different
databases (all with the same schema), and Id like to
be able to lookup the EJB via a different JNDI name,
and have the exact same functionality, just against
different deployed datasources.
Does the spec allow/support this?
If not, any suggestions as to how to achieve this sort
of functionality?
Im using JBoss 3.2.1 on Solaris, so Im not sure
whether or not this is a JBoss "issue" or a limitation
of the EJB Spec (or me being just plain wrong and
trying to do something the "wrong way")
NickI haven't done it but judging from the deployment descriptors yes.
For example if I have two bounded datasources java:/Database1 and java:/Database2
Lets say I have a session bean called MySession, then in your ejb-jar.xml you would have (notice that the desc, display, and ejb-name are the only differences)
<session>
<description>MySessionAlpha</description>
<display-name>MySessionAlpha</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<description>MySessionBeta</description>
<display-name>MySessionBeta</display-name>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name>
<home>com.mycorp.MySessionRemoteHome</home>
<remote>com.mycorp.MySessionRemote</remote>
<local-home>com.mycorp.MySessionLocalHome</local-home>
<local>com.mycorp.MySessionLocal</local>
<ejb-class>com.mycorp.MySessionFacadeBean</ejb-class>
<session-type>Stateless</session-type>
<transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/DataSource</res-ref-name>
<res-type>javax.sql.DataSource</res-type>
<res-auth>Container</res-auth>
</resource-ref>
</session>
But now in the jboss.xml, we will have the following elements. What you may notice is that are bound to different remote and local jndi names. But the resource bindings are very different. The res-ref-name stays the same, but the jndi-name are different. I think this will work for you.
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionAlpha</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionAlphaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database1</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>
<session>
<ejb-name>MySessionBeta</ejb-name> <jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaRemoteHome</jndi-name> <local-jndi-name>ejb/com/mycorp/MySessionBetaLocalHome</local-jndi-name>
<resource-ref>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/datasource</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>java:/Database2</jndi-name>
</resource-ref>
</session>

Use of Multiple instances of the same browser...

Hi folks,
I have a question...
I have inherited a large APEX application, it uses Oracle SSO to log in.
We are migrating the application to a new set of servers and are running regression tests.
The testers are logging in using IE6 and opening multiple instances of the application at the same time on both the oldTest and newTest servers.
So at any one time, there can be:an application Admin user (username ADMINTEST123) logged into the application on oldTest
an application Admin user (username ADMINTEST123) logged into the application on newTest
an application standard user (username TEST123) logged into the application on oldTest
an application standard user (username TEST123) logged into the application on newTestIs this supported?
Could someone tell me or point me toward the documentation or thread that lists what is supported / unsupported for browser use with APEX and SSO?
Thanks in advance,
Gus..

Hi lev,
thanks but sorry, that doesn't really help me, I'm talking about users and their logins, not developers using different browsers while developing apex.
Also, our users are locked down to IE6 for the foreseeable future.
Hi Scott,
I found the following quote from this web site http://aranea.zuavra.net/index.php/80/ about Cookie separation in modern browsers
*4.3. Internet Explorer 6.0*
Finally, Explorer is the one that introduces an interesting quirk. It too has separate settings per machine users, although it cannot make use of multiple profiles for the same user.
The interesting thing is the way it handles session cookies. Normally, long term a.k.a. non-session cookies are stored on disk in the user preferences. However, Explorer has a setting called “browse in new process” which, if enabled, forces a new session with each new window. That’s right, this means that every time you open a new Explorer window it opens a separate process, even though the windows belong to the same user! And, in turn, these processes will NOT share their session cookies.
Note: By “new window” I mean windows started from shortcuts, from Start Menu entries or by calling iexplore.exe directly somehow (from a file manager, for example). Windows started via Control+N or File/New window run in the same process and share session cookies. Also, please note that it’s a lot more likely for users to click their taskbar shortcut when they need a new window than it is to use the File menu or the Control+N shortcut.+
Furthermore, ever since version 5.0 the setting cannot be changed manually, by the user. It is automatically determined by the browser based on how much RAM the machine has. Anything with at least 32 MB of RAM gets the “one window, one process” behaviour, which nowadays means almost all machines.
I have tested the *"new window"* opening methods and found that for IE6 there is NO NEW PROCESS started when the user opens a new window in the following 3 ways:
from an open window, File>New>Window
from an open window, CTRL+N
from an open window, right click>Open in New Window
So from this can I conclude that from what you say and the results above we may get issues if users login and then open new windows in those ways?
Thanks,
Gus..

N8 - Same widget, multiple instance.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for