New WSUS on Server 2012 - problem with win8 clients

Hi,
Two weeks ago we created a new Server 2012 and installed the WSUS role from scratch on it.  Its version number is:  6.2.9200.16384.  It replaced a Server 2008 WSUS server.  After some time all the win7 clients updated and reported as
they did on the old and replaced server.
However all our win8 clients refuse to update against this server.  They show correctly up in WSUS server console each with 107 needed updates day after day.  We have rebooted them and done numerous wuauclt /resetauthorization /detectnow and wuauclt
/detectnow /reportnow, but to no avail.
I paste in some lines from a win8 client winupdate log at the end of this message if someone can figure out what I have to do to get these clients update as they did against the old wsus server.  Thanks for help on this issue.
regards Tor
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent    ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent      * Online = Yes; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent      * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent      * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent      * Search Scope = {Machine & All Users}
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Agent      * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-18
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    153c    Misc    Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77\wuredir.cab:
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    1990    AU    >>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {ABC7E77F-635F-4192-9B92-CBF9B1CB8AB0} ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}]
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    1990    AU      # 0 updates detected
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    1990    AU    #########
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    1990    AU    ##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {ABC7E77F-635F-4192-9B92-CBF9B1CB8AB0} ServiceId = {3DA21691-E39D-4DA6-8A4B-B43877BCB1B7}]
2014-02-03    08:33:38:008     920    1990    AU    #############
2014-02-03    08:33:38:023     920    153c    Misc     Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-02-03    08:33:38:023     920    153c    Misc     Infrastructure signed: Yes
2014-02-03    08:33:38:023     920    153c    EP    Got 9482F4B4-E343-43B6-B170-9A65BC822C77 redir SecondaryServiceAuth URL: "http://fe1.ws.microsoft.com/w8/2/redir/storeauth.cab"
2014-02-03    08:33:38:023     920    153c    Misc    Validating signature for C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution\WuRedir\117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782\wuredir.cab:
2014-02-03    08:33:38:039     920    153c    Misc     Microsoft signed: Yes
2014-02-03    08:33:38:039     920    153c    Misc     Infrastructure signed: Yes
2014-02-03    08:33:38:039     920    153c    EP    Got 117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782 redir Client/Server URL: "https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx"
2014-02-03    08:33:38:055     920    153c    PT    +++++++++++  PT: Synchronizing server updates  +++++++++++
2014-02-03    08:33:38:055     920    153c    PT      + ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}, Server URL = https://fe2.ws.microsoft.com/v6/ClientWebService/client.asmx
2014-02-03    08:33:38:055     920    153c    Agent    Reading cached app categories using lifetime 604800 seconds
2014-02-03    08:33:38:055     920    153c    Agent    Read 0 cached app categories
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E7FF661C-6A03-4387-A1EE-1D723B52EF60}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A9A0E183-0667-46D6-84E4-17CEBCEE5A22}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent      * Found 13 updates and 31 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 69 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent    **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    1a64    Report    REPORT EVENT: {0786C161-F6DC-4842-85D6-9506124654AD}    2014-02-03 08:33:38:008+0100    1  
 147 [AGENT_DETECTION_FINISHED]    101    {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}    0    0    Windows Update Command Line    Success    Software Synchronization  
 Windows Update Client successfully detected 0 updates.
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    1a64    Report    REPORT EVENT: {1E5D9728-220F-44A3-8BCC-ADE69687531D}    2014-02-03 08:33:38:008+0100    1  
 156 [AGENT_STATUS_30]    101    {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}    0    0    Windows Update Command Line    Success    Pre-Deployment Check  
 Reporting client status.
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    1a64    Report    REPORT EVENT: {57BAB7D0-685B-4D73-BDF7-82AFCE8675B0}    2014-02-03 08:33:39:211+0100    1  
 147 [AGENT_DETECTION_FINISHED]    101    {00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}    0    0    Windows Update Command Line    Success    Software Synchronization  
 Windows Update Client successfully detected 13 updates.
2014-02-03    08:33:39:211     920    1a64    Report    CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent    ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent      * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent      * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent      * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent      * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03    08:33:39:227     920    153c    Agent      * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1155
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A9A0E183-0667-46D6-84E4-17CEBCEE5A22}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Found 11 updates and 29 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 58 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03    08:33:39:258     920    153c    Agent      * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-2212025170-3189117132-1219651784-500
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03    08:33:39:305     920    153c    Agent      * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1323
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    ** START **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Online = No; Ignore download priority = No
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Criteria = "IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Installation' or IsPresent=1 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation'
or IsInstalled=1 and DeploymentAction='Installation' and RebootRequired=1 or IsInstalled=0 and DeploymentAction='Uninstallation' and RebootRequired=1"
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * ServiceID = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782} Third party service
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Search Scope = {Current User}
2014-02-03    08:33:39:352     920    153c    Agent      * Caller SID for Applicability: S-1-5-21-4260610346-2664610402-3334891387-1282
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {E8B477DF-479E-4BCA-B8F8-2D987A509009}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BB85CCA0-88DC-4DA7-8E81-B7F7E5E73B81}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {18DEF1D9-4513-467E-9D7E-E1772855BB9E}.100 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {971D9BE4-5145-4DB5-962C-CEE2EE3A2842}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {CCB380C9-29F5-4305-96DD-86DE2D00438B}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {455BDD67-9ED0-4DE7-94F1-3480EA942414}.12 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {ADFBFCE0-FFD4-4826-B9CF-50AE8182E3C5}.2 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {BFA8C8B8-EEF7-4A82-A36C-8F760F792430}.3 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {3F05DE38-92BC-44B6-B06B-5217E5CF12CA}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {36BEF0D5-80ED-4942-8457-6F9C88546E06}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Added update {A292CD86-AB4E-4388-8C7B-CFB392EDE6AC}.1 to search result
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent      * Found 11 updates and 30 categories in search; evaluated appl. rules of 60 out of 94 deployed entities
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent    *********
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent    **  END  **  Agent: Finding updates [CallerId = Windows Update Command Line]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    153c    Agent    *************
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    >>##  RESUMED  ## AU: Search for updates [CallId = {66AF0139-896D-4607-8660-B66D2B58EA26} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU      # 12 updates detected
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    #########
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    ##  END  ##  AU: Search for updates  [CallId = {66AF0139-896D-4607-8660-B66D2B58EA26} ServiceId = {117CAB2D-82B1-4B5A-A08C-4D62DBEE7782}]
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    #############
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    All AU searches complete.
2014-02-03    08:33:39:383     920    1990    AU    AU setting next detection timeout to 2014-02-03 10:18:51
2014-02-03    08:33:44:211     920    1a64    Report    CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-02-03    08:41:39:472     920    1a64    EP    Got WSUS Client/Server URL: "http://elias:8530/ClientWebService/client.asmx"
2014-02-03    08:41:39:472     920    1a64    PT    WARNING: Cached cookie has expired or new PID is available
2014-02-03    08:41:39:472     920    1a64    EP    Got WSUS SimpleTargeting URL: "http://elias:8530"
2014-02-03    08:41:39:472     920    1a64    PT    Initializing simple targeting cookie, clientId = c5e26849-287b-4b96-ba5d-1489d6fad2f2, target group = , DNS name = dt-ikt-tor.framnes.lan
2014-02-03    08:41:39:472     920    1a64    PT      Server URL = http://elias:8530/SimpleAuthWebService/SimpleAuth.asmx
2014-02-03    08:41:39:519     920    1a64    EP    Got WSUS Reporting URL: "http://elias:8530/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx"
2014-02-03    08:41:39:519     920    1a64    Report    Uploading 2 events using cached cookie, reporting URL = http://elias:8530/ReportingWebService/ReportingWebService.asmx
2014-02-03    08:41:39:566     920    1a64    Report    Reporter successfully uploaded 2 events.
2014-02-03    08:42:13:212     920    178c    Report    WARNING: CSerializationHelper:: InitSerialize failed : 0x80070002
2014-02-03    08:43:40:450     920    178c    AU    ###########  AU: Uninitializing Automatic Updates  ###########
2014-02-03    08:43:40:450     920    178c    WuTask    Uninit WU Task Manager
2014-02-03    08:43:40:513     920    178c    Service    *********
2014-02-03    08:43:40:513     920    178c    Service    **  END  **  Service: Service exit [Exit code = 0x240001]
2014-02-03    08:43:40:513     920    178c    Service    *************

Today I opened Control Panel / Windows Updates and first did a check for new updates (from the WSUS server).  Nothing was found and it reported Windows is Updated.   Then I clicked the link Check for updates from Microsoft via internet, and
it found around 24 updates.
This is confirmation of the point that I made in the previous post. The updates are *NEEDED* by this system, but the updates were not *AVAILABLE* from the assigned WSUS Server. You were able to get them from Windows Update, but that does not fix your continuing
issue with the WSUS Server.
but it still reported the original 108 Needed updates.
Exactly. As previously noted, the client is functioning perfectly. The problem is NOT with the client; the problem is with the WSUS Server. The updates that this client needed were not AVAILABLE to be downloaded from the WSUS server.
Why this is the case requires further investigation on your part, but is either because the updates are not properly approved, or the update FILES are not yet downloaded from Microsoft to the WSUS server.
It appears that the wsus server doesn't get any information back from the client despite that it displays new Last contact and Last Status report timestamps.
This conclusion is incorrect. The WSUS Server got every bit of information available from the client -- you've confirmed this by the number of updates reported as "Needed" by the Windows Update Agent to the WSUS Server.
I assumed that the log would display if the updates were downloaded or not.
It will log when the updates are actually downloaded. If there's no log entries for updates being downloaded, then they're not being downloaded. If the logfile says "Found 0 updates", then that means exactly what it says: It couldn't find any approved/available
updates to download.
In your case it "Found 11 updates", but now it will be impossible to diagnose that fault, because you went and got them from Windows Update.
All Win8 versions are checked in the WSUS server's Product list so the updates should at least have been downloaded to the server.
This is why understanding the infrastructure is so critical. Your conclusion is invalid based on the premise given, and you may be using improper terminology which only confuses the rest of us as well.
First, selecting updates for synchronization only gets the update metadata (i.e. the detection logic) downloaded to the WSUS database.
The Second Step in this process is to Approve those updates for one or more WSUS Target Groups that contain the appropriate client systems. Following the approval of an update, the WSUS Server downloads the INSTALLATION FILE for that update.
Once the WUAgent sees an approved update and the installation file is available, then the WUAgent will download the file and schedule the update for installation.
Most of the post I read about my problem is about upgrading a 2008 WSUS server to support Win8 / Server 12 clients.  When I try to run this update on my Server 12 WSUS it refuses to run (probably because it is for Server 2008).
Yeah.. totally different issue in those posts than what you're describing here.
What should I do to try to track down the problem?
Well.... now that it's 11 days since the logfile was posted, and you've already updated that system, we'll first need to find another system exhibiting the same issue.
Then I'll need to ask a number of questions to properly understand the environment, as well as what you have or have not done.
Then, from there, we can attempt to figure out why your Windows 8 client apparently sees some updates as approved/available but is still not downloading them. We do not yet have sufficient information to even speculate on a possible cause -- there are several.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCSA, MCITP:EA, MCDBA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2014)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence%20R%20Garvin-32101
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Similar Messages

  • Server 2012 - Problem with multiple instances of RDS looking to the same license server. Server Pools requiring the wrong servers.

    Hi All,
    I have two domains, prod.local and test.local.  On prod.local, I have a license server living on the connection broker.  I have created a two way trust between the domains so that the RDS instance on test.local can use the license server on prod.local.
     When I first setup the RDS instance on test.local and point it to use the license server on prod.local everything appears to work, all servers recognize the license server.  
    However when I log off and back on, and click the RDS dashboard in test.local, the Remote Desktop Services overview states I need to add every server from prod.local to the server pool.  This is bothersome because the Remote Desktop Services on test.local
    is still functioning, but I am no longer able to manage it.  When I add the servers from prod.local to the server pool I am displayed the setup for prod.local instead of test.local
    Is there a way around this?  Can I use the same RDS license server key multiple times?
    tldr: Using a different domain's license server causes my RDS instance in Server Manager to display the wrong RDS farm.

    Hi Nathan,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server forum.
    Please check the required ports must be opened on firewall.
    - To issue RDS Per User CALs to users in other domains, there must be a two-way trust between the domains, and the license server must be a member of the Terminal Server License Servers group in those domains.
    - To restrict the issuance of RDS CALs, you can add RDS Host Servers into Terminal Server Computers group on RDS Licensing servers.
    - Configure RDS licensing server on all RDS Host Servers in each domain/forest. You can do it through RDS host configuration snap-in or through a group policy. 
    - Add administrators group of each domain/forest in the local administrators of RDS licensing server. This way, you’ll not get a prompt to enter your credentials when you’ll open RDS host configuration snap-ins in trusted domains/forests.
    More information:
    Best practices for setting up Remote Desktop Licensing (Terminal Server Licensing) across Active Directory Domains/Forests or Workgroup
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2473823
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki

  • WSUS on Server 2012 Standard R2 with SCCM 2012 Standard R2 Proper Setup

    What is the proper setup (best practice) on setting up WSUS using Server 2012 Standard R2 to work properly with SCCM 2012 R2 Standard using Server 2012 Standard R2 on separate box?
    1. Is it using WID or database during the setup of WSUS using Server 2012 Standard R2?
    2. Once it setup properly on WSUS using Server 2012 Standard R2 either WID or database (using SQL 2012 Standard SP1), how do I connect with SCCM 2012 R2 Standard using Server 2012 Standard R2 on separate box?
    3. On SCCM 2012 R2 Standard using Server 2012 Standard R2 just need to add WSUS Role, right? Is it using WID or database?
    Thanks,
    Reza

    1. Generally, using the SQL instance you use for ConfigMgr is preferred.
    2. The Software Update Point connects ConfigMgr to a WSUS instance.
    3. See 2.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com
    It's just as Jason said. The SUP role in SCCM basically "sits on top" of the WSUS role, whether it is local or remote is up to you. You basically install WSUS on a server like you normally would WITHOUT configuring it. I have used both WID and SQL. It's
    always nicer to put it on your SQL server since that is (should be) backed up regularly and maintained.
    Once you have WSUS installed you just point SCCMs SUP role at the installation and it takes over the rest.
    Dustin Estes - MCP | www.dustinestes.com

  • Unable to install SQL Server 2012 along with BIDS & VS 2012 on Windows 7

    Unable to install SQL Server 2012 along with BIDS & VS 2012 on Windows 7 professional.
    I get the below error
    Could not find vsjitdebugger.exe
    Blogs say anti-virus is stopping but I dont have one on the system.
    Note: I had used SQL 2008 on the system previously and has a refresh i have deleted all the software to speed up the system.
    Now i could not install both the software.
    Can I get some help regarding this?

    Hi Nandu,
    As your description, you come across an error(vsjitdebugger.exe cannot be found). Please confirm if the error occurs during the installation of SQL Server 2012.  If so, please help post SQL Server setup logs. By default, SQL Server setup log file locates
    in C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\110\Setup Bootstrap\Log.
    Base on my research, this error could be caused by that the previous uninstallation is improper and vsjitdebugger.exe file could be mistakenly deleted.
    To troubleshoot the issue, you could start your computer into Safe Mode and fix your problem with one of the following methods. For more information, please refer to the article:
    http://www.fixerrorkit.com/fix-error/fix-vsjitdebugger.exe-error.html.
    1. You could execute the sfc /scannow command following steps below.
    a. Press "Windows+R", type in cmd and then right click "Run as administrator"
    b. Type in sfc /scannow (There's a space between sfc and /scannow) into the dialog and hit Enter key and click ok.
    c. Wait until the System File Checker finishes the check.
    2. You could use a Windows repair installation, also known as a Startup Repair to repair your Windows system files.
    3. You could install the latest Windows updates to fix vsjitdebugger.exe error. Microsoft often releases new service packs and system patches to replace or update some DLL files of Windows system.
    4. You could use third-party tool such as Automatic Error Fix Tool to fix your vsjitdebugger.exe error. However, Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any third-party software or information found there.
    In addition, if you are unable to install  Visual Studio, I suggest you post your question in Visual Studio Setup and Installation forum at
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/home?forum=vssetup  . It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
    Regards,
    Michelle Li

  • Disappearing disk space Windows Server 2012 R2 with SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise

    I've got an interesting problem with a virtual machine in our VMWare environment.  It is Windows Server 2012 R2 with SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise installed.  I started out with a 60GB disk and it started running out of space, so I increased
    it in VMWare and extended the partition to 100GB.  Well, that lasted for a bit and so I extended it again.  I've done this 3 or 4 times and now I've got a 160GB disk with about 2-3GB of space remaining (and it started with 10GB remaining). 
    WinDirStat shows 105GB of <Unknown> space being used, which is probably my issue.  However, I can't determine what this is and it keeps growing like a tapeworm.  The context menu on the <Unknown> files has all the options disabled,
    so WinDirStat doesn't appear to have access to whatever the file(s) is/are.  I've performed several chkdsk /f on the C: drive and nothing bad is reported.  I don't have any restore points and am not running VSS (that I'm aware of).  The pagefile
    reports as being about 4.9GB, so that's not the issue.  No large files are shown anywhere and my explorer settings are set to show me all files, including system files.
    When I try to run WinDirStat with elevated permissions, it hangs and becomes unresponsive. 
    I've even resorted to running CCleaner to see if it found anything, but it simply found the standard temp files and such...about 1GB. 
    I'm pulling my hair out...and I don't have much to start with.  Anyone have any ideas?
    Thanks
    Russ

    It appears that somehow, Microsoft Fusion Assembly binding logging was turned on and many of the temp folders located at c:\users\username\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\InetCache\IE were filling up with hundreds of thousands of Fusion HTM log files. 
    This is controlled by an entry in the registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\ForceLog which was set to 1.  Hopefully, setting it back to zero will fix the issue.  As a result of figuring this out, I have recovered almost 80GB of disk
    space occupied by the log files.
    I thought WinDirStat would show me what I needed to know, but it turns out TreeSize (which I've used in the past) works much better.
    Russ

  • Using SQL Server 2012 Express with Bitocker

    Hello,
    I'm currently working on getting our SQL Server Express database working with BitLocker but I am coming across a few problems. Here is my scenario:
    The OS is partitioned into two volumes (C and D).
    The C volume contains the OS and Software, while the D volume is primarily used for the database files (logs, back, and mdf).
    The D volume is encrypted using BitLocker
    The database connects using the SA account (SQL Server Authentication)
    From what I understand, BitLocker must be enabled with the same account that the SQL Server is running on. So what I have done is change the SQL Server service account to the user account (lets say its called User) via SQL Configuration Manager. While staying
    logged into User account, I then enable BitLocker via Control Panel -> System and Security -> BitLocker Drive Encryption. I then reboot and then while the software is trying to connect to the database I get the following  exception:
    'login failed for user sa'.
    Is there anything I need to do to get this working? Thanks for the help.

    Hi moncadad,
    When you turn off BitLocker, does the database also show “Recovery Pending”? If so, the simplest cause for “Recovery Pending” might be that a disk spin-up was slow, or a disk became full. Please read this
    blog to fix the issue, then check if you can successfully connect to the database after you turn on BitLocker.
    However, if you are not able to view the database contents only after you turn on BitLocker, I suspect that there are some issues about configuring BitLocker. As far as I know, Bitlocker must be performed by a member of Local Admins Group, please make sure
    that your account is a member of Local Admins Group on your computer.
    Also I would like to recommend you post the question in the
    Microsoft Bitlocker Administration and Monitoring (MBAM) forum to get better support. For more details about configuring SQL Server with Bitlocker, please review the following similar articles.
    Using SQL Server 2012 Standard with Bitlocker
    How can I retrieve my BitLocker recovery key from MBAM in Windows PE
    Thanks,
    Lydia Zhang
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here.
    Lydia Zhang
    TechNet Community Support

  • TPC 2012 - Problems with shared variable

    Hi,
    I tried to program simmilar thing to this one http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5548 on TPC 2012. But it doesn't work.I can see that both programs on my laptop and TPC are working(I've added an additional counter with display), but I cannot see any effect on TPC when I change the value of shared variable on my laptop. I use LabView 8.6 with Touch Panel Module. My question is what are the exact steps to run such application on TPC2012? Are they the same as for TPC 2006?
    I've noticed following issues:
    1.I cannot deploy the program from Project Manager(there is an information that maybe TPC Service is not started. - I've found such information about TPC Service http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/DE177828D27A14A48625734E00768B66 but in fact I cannot find Start » All Programs»National Instruments » NI TPC Service » NI TPC Service Manager 1.0 Does it mean, that the TPC Service is not installed and the programm with shared varibles won't be working or can I start it somehow in another way? Do I need to have TPC service installed on TPC2012?
    Until now, I've built the project and sent it through FTP to TPC(the folder was /TEMP) and then started it.
    2.Ping works OK
    Thank you in advance for any hints how to solve this problem.
    Martin

    Well no problem, but I'm frustrated with this issue... I've tested many things and nothing. Just to help someone else as I in the future, these are my sources:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/TPC-2012-Problems-with-shared-variable/m-p/1009631/highlight/false#M...
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/28536DE7E2D9E98B8625770B00738920?OpenDocument
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/372507B-01/lvtpcgsm/tpc_install_sharvar/
    http://zone.ni.com/reference/en-XX/help/372507C-01/lvtpcgsm/tpc_install_sharvar/
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/23532363F4905EC28625727A00730B80?OpenDocument
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/FieldPoint-Family/TPC-2006-Not-Listed-in-Targets-and-Devices/td-p/566325
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/MAX-can-t-detect-TPC-2106T/td-p/831524
    http://zone.ni.com/devzone/cda/tut/p/id/5868
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/28B748B9697B79E18625725A00009066?OpenDocument
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/websearch/D1726990DCEB82E4862570F20069C57D?OpenDocument
    http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/3B469103BBDD4CE48625726000665B36
    I hope find some hint..
    Fabian León
    Certified LabVIEW Associate Developer

  • What's New in SQL Server 2012 SP2

    Hi All,
    I can't find the page for "What's New in SQL Server 2012 SP2". Does anyone knows what features improved. Need to present to the Business for applying SP2.
    Thanks in advance.

    SQL Server 2012 Service Pack 2 is available - but there's a catch!
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/aaron_bertrand/archive/2014/06/10/sql-server-2012-service-pack-2-is-available.aspx
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • I have Photoshop CS6 problem with Win8

    I had Win7 and didn`t have any problems but I bought Win8 upgrade and I install it without any changes of my PC settings ... that was option offered from Win8 insatallation manager.
    My problem with Ps CS6 is next my files are open as a tabs and when I "move" image with hand tool  the paste board flashing from dark grey to transperant...very anoying.
    Sometimes when I "scale" image with move tool image area get black and I can`t see the image scale...
    How to fix that Please help I can`t work with normal concentration...very anoying Please help?

    Flickering is a known problem with Win8. We and the GPU vendors are working with Microsoft to get it fixed, and seeing if we can implement workarounds until the fix arrives.
    The image going dark also means a display driver problem.
    You can try turning off GPU drawing in preferences, or setting the GPU mode to basic, for the time being.

  • How to to make Cluster between two server 2012 Datacenter with share storage and Hyper-V role then install Exchange 2013 on each server datacenter then make DAG between Exchange servers

    Dears,
    I have IBM Flex server with built in storage,  
    HOW to to make Cluster between two  server 2012 Datacenter with share storage and Hyper-V role then install Exchange 2013 on each server datacenter then make DAG between Exchange servers?
    If there any prerequisites of the Share storage types ?and any configuration guide to deploy Cluster between two Server 2012 datacenter ?

    Microsoft Failover Clusters require shared storage.  If you wish to create a failover cluster with local storage, you need to use third party software to mirror the disks and present it to the hosts (siog.com, datacore.com, starwind.com).  If you
    use third party software, you will need to follow their instructions for configuring the environment.
    Questions on how to configure Exchange environments are better asked in an Exchange forum.
    .:|:.:|:. tim

  • Problems with QuickVPN client

    Hello,
    I experiance problems with QuickVPN client (version 1.4.1.2). I'm trying to connect to router SA520 with 1.1.65 firmware,
    vpn tunell is established, but client says "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait?"
    in case i click no, it drops vpn tunell
    QuickVPN client log looks like this:
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]OS Version: Windows 7
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Domain Profile Settings: ON
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Windows Firewall Private Profile Settings: ON
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]One network interface detected with IP address 192.168.1.100
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [STATUS]Connecting...
    2010/08/18 12:13:27 [DEBUG]Input VPN Server Address = vpn.in-volv.lv
    2010/08/18 12:13:28 [STATUS]Connecting to remote gateway with IP address: 78.28.223.10
    2010/08/18 12:13:28 [WARNING]Server's certificate doesn't exist on your local computer.
    2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Remote gateway was reached by https ...
    2010/08/18 12:13:30 [STATUS]Provisioning...
    2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Success to connect.
    2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Tunnel is configured. Ping test is about to start.
    2010/08/18 12:13:39 [STATUS]Verifying Network...
    2010/08/18 12:13:44 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
    2010/08/18 12:13:47 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
    2010/08/18 12:13:50 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
    2010/08/18 12:13:53 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
    2010/08/18 12:13:56 [WARNING]Failed to ping remote VPN Router!
    2010/08/18 12:14:08 [WARNING]Ping was blocked, which can be caused by an unexpected disconnect.
    2010/08/18 12:14:12 [STATUS]Disconnecting...
    2010/08/18 12:14:15 [STATUS]Success to disconnect.
    Server logs look like this:
    2010-08-18 12:28:49: INFO:  Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "arvils"
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  NAT detected: PEER
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:e2cd855a75fc0887:6dc3b2e025152444
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=47693803(0x2d7bfeb)
    2010-08-18 12:29:02: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=1079189482(0x40531fea)
    2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO:  an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
    2010-08-18 12:35:57: INFO:  Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=1079189482(0x40531fea).
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Configuration found for 83.243.93.200[500].
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[500]<=>83.243.93.200[500]
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  For 83.243.93.200[500], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  NAT-D payload matches for 78.28.223.10[500]
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for 83.243.93.200[500]
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  NAT detected: PEER
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Floating ports for NAT-T with peer 83.243.93.200[4500]
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA established for 78.28.223.10[4500]-83.243.93.200[4500] with spi:28447d39874689f9:a2b7da19d8d86413
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 78.28.223.10[0]<=>83.243.93.200[0]
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.1.100/32
    2010-08-18 12:40:46: INFO:  Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
    2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=259246202(0xf73c87a)
    2010-08-18 12:40:47: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->4500]: ESP/Tunnel 78.28.223.10->83.243.93.200 with spi=3642234214(0xd9181566)
    2010-08-18 12:43:27: INFO:  IPsec-SA expired: ESP/Tunnel 83.243.93.200->78.28.223.10 with spi=33356156(0x1fcf97c)
    2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO:  an undead schedule has been deleted: 'pk_recvupdate'.
    2010-08-18 12:45:47: INFO:  Purged IPsec-SA with proto_id=ESP and spi=3642234214(0xd9181566).
    The most interesting thing is that sometimes this message appears, sometimes not (with the same configuration).
    Please help!

    Hi,
    I have some problem. I am using Windows 7 Entreprice x64. I use SA520 Firmware 1.1.65 and QuickVPN 1.4.1.2 port 60443.
    "The remote gateway is not responding. Do you want to wait"
    2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO:  Adding IPSec configuration with identifier "username"
    2010-08-18 17:25:51: INFO:  Adding IKE configuration with identifer "username"
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=>xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  NAT detected: ME PEER
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:ed4f291c71c1b688:7e6a8a0968f878fb
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Responding to new phase 2 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[0]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[0]
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Using IPsec SA configuration: 192.168.75.0/24<->192.168.170.224/32
    2010-08-18 17:26:04: INFO:  Adjusting peer's encmode 3(3)->Tunnel(1)
    2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 48540->4500]: ESP/Tunnel xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx->172.22.5.10 with spi=239099274(0xe405d8a)
    2010-08-18 17:26:05: INFO:  IPsec-SA established[UDP encap 4500->48540]: ESP/Tunnel 172.22.5.10-> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with spi=3886848189(0xe7ac98bd)
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  NAT detected: ME PEER
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
    2010-08-18 17:26:07: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36.
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Configuration found for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235].
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received request for new phase 1 negotiation: 172.22.5.10[500]<=> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Beginning Identity Protection mode.
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received Vendor ID: draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  Received unknown Vendor ID
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  For xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235], Selected NAT-T version: RFC 3947
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for 172.22.5.10[500]
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  NAT-D payload does not match for xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[235]
    2010-08-18 17:27:14: INFO:  NAT detected: ME PEER
    2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:699f34b434d4318c:df4adca414787d36
    2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO:  Floating ports for NAT-T with peer xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540]
    2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA established for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
    2010-08-18 17:27:15: INFO:  Sending Informational Exchange: notify payload[INITIAL-CONTACT]
    2010-08-18 17:28:20: INFO:  Purged ISAKMP-SA with proto_id=ISAKMP and spi=3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a.
    2010-08-18 17:28:21: INFO:  ISAKMP-SA deleted for 172.22.5.10[4500]- xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx[48540] with spi:3fe5eb0bddbf2b9a:f5c11d7f813ca74a
    With windows XP Pro i dont have this problem.
    Is there a detailed configuration guide?
    10x

  • Problem with Variable Client Support

    Hello,
    I work with Labview 8.5 and Crio 9014.
    I have a problem with  Variable Client Support. When I try to compile my project I have the following error:
    "The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target for this application to function properly..."
    I have read that we have to install the Variable Client Support in Measurement and Automation by right-clicking on the software and then choosing add/remove software but I can't install the appropriate shared variable components because I can't see neither Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support. So what can I do?
    Can somebody help me?
    Thanks

    I have exactly the same problem. I wanted go through the "Getting Started with the LabVIEW RT module" and when I use wizard for generating new project I get same notification in my VI... 
    The Network Variable Engine and Variable Client Support must be installed on the RT target
    for this application to function properly. If the Network Variable Engine is not supported on
    the target (e.g. FP-2000 with <32MB of RAM), open the project and move the variable library
    to My Computer in the project. Doing this will deploy the variables to localhost but
    will still require that Variable Client Support be installed on the RT target.
    Could someone help please ? 
    Attachments:
    ni.png ‏95 KB

  • Does Windows Server 2012 support Remote Desktop Client 6.1?

    Hi,
    Does Windows Server 2012 support Remote Desktop Client 6.1? IU can't find a link anywhere on the Microsoft site to confirm this!
    Thanks,
    Jim

    this should help you
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/b664ddaf-6c11-49e2-8a69-0df3b8ef13a1/server-2012r2-rds-farm-with-xp-and-windows-vista-clients?forum=winserverTS

  • We encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8. Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following er

    I encountered a problem with some client machines that use Firefox version 24ESR and IE8.
    Ajax requests of aspx pages from Firefox are getting the following error from the iis server (iis version 7.5):
    Bad Request - Request Too Long
    HTTP Error 400. The size of the request headers is too long.
    From analyzing the request that was sent to the server, I saw that the request consist of only the viewstate of the aspx page.
    I tried to disable the viewstate for one page and the server got the request correctly.
    I do not encounter any issues on these laptops with postback requests from Firefox or when running the same application with IE8.

    Sometimes that means that the page address sent is loo long.
    Check the link address you are using.
    I can't help you further and will send for more help.

  • Server 2003 SBS (with Exchange 2003) migrate to new machine Server 2012 Standard (with Exchange 2013)

    This is what I have:
    A very outdated machine running a small domain, SBS 2003 and Exchange - this is the ONLY server currently.
    This is what my boss ordered:
    A Dell R210 II machine with Server 2012 Standard (and I downloaded the trial for Exchange 2013).
    He wants the old server completely replaced and gone - with everything moved over (including Exchange) to the new machine. The main reason for the upgrade is that not all users can access email on their machines (Macs, new versions of Outlook, etc.)
    I have set up a new standalone server before but never migrated one - and I've found that going from SBS2003/Exchange2003 to Server2012/Exchange2013 is not simple in the least.
    I thought I could just set up the new server as a DC on the domain and have everything replicated to it from the source server. Then I could decommission the old server. I have been told that 1) I can't upgrade Exchange 2003 to 2013 and 2) that I shouldn't
    put Exchange on a DC. What do you do if you only have the one server?

    Hi,
    Just additional. Please also refer to following threads and article, then check if can help you.
    Migrate
    SBS 2003 to Windows Server 2012 Standard
    Migration
    SBS 2003 to Windows Server 2012 Standard
    Transition
    from Small Business Server to Standard Windows Server
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installation problem on Dell P4 machine...

    While I was trying to install Solaris 8 to a Dell P4 machine (8100 series), after the "Copyright..." line, the installation process never gets to the section where it should display "Configuring /dev and /devices". Each time the installation gets to

  • HTML DB application using table in a different schema

    I need to create a new HTML DB application. The table is in a different schema than mine. The DBA granted me rights to see it and I can see it from iSQL. HTML DB does not give the alternative of selecting this table.

  • Steps to upgrade from 10.5.8 to Mountain Lion

    Please help.  I am trying to upgrade to OS X mountain Lion from10.5.8 how do I do it? Thank you in advance for your help and support.

  • MIGO saving problem

    Dear MM Expertise fourms, When saving in MIGO I can get the document number but showing the error like: Express document "Update was terminated" received from author "Bishnu..." System ID....   DFS Client.......   330 User.....   BISHNU Transaction..

  • Disabling Adobe Acrobat - how to?

    Hi all, I'm running Safari 3.0.4 on a MacBook Pro running Mac OS 10.5.1. I installed Adobe CS3, and with it came Adobe Acrobat 8 Professional. Although I do like Adobe Acrobat, I do not want it to be the preferred reader in Safari - I would like prev