NI VISA Version Differences

I have a driver for a third party card that was developed by National Instruments. The driver works with LabVIEW 7.0 and NI VISA 3.0. The driver does not appear to work with LabVIEW 7.1 and NI-VISA 3.2. I am trying to ascertain the differences between the two versions of VISA. Can someone please identify these differences or point me in the right direction.

You can find some information from the "VISA Run-time Engine Version 3.2 for Windows 2000/NT/XP" Readme.txt file:
http://digital.ni.com/softlib.nsf/websearch/C0CDC738994FCBC886256EEB004E9BB3?opendocument
To save you some time though:
NI-VISA 3.2 IMPROVEMENTS AND BUG FIXES
Enabling the NiVisaTulip Passport would cause applications to crash on exit.
This is fixed.
For a USB RAW resource, calling viEnableEvent on VI_EVENT_USB_INTR with the
VI_HNDLR mechanism would cause a crash when the first interrupt arrived.
This is fixed.
Added support in MAX for the standard Export and Import wizard. For NI-VISA,
this allows you to transfer the VISA aliases and driver settings.
Calling viPrintf on a remote VISA session would return VI_ERROR_IO instead
of VI_ERROR_RSRC_LOCKED when the remote resource was locked. This is fixed.
The VISA Interactive Control utility (VISAIC) now displays an error message
box when viFindRsrc returns an error.
For a PXI INSTR resource, calling viDisableEvent and then viWaitOnEvent would
cause a crash. On Windows, the application would exit; on LabVIEW RT (both
Phar Lap ETS and RTX), the system would need to be rebooted. This is fixed.
The NI-VISA COM API now supports PXI (INSTR, MEMACC) and USB (INSTR, RAW).
Right-clicking on a PXI chassis in MAX now provides the option to open a
VISA session to that PXI BACKPLANE resource.
Fixed various issues in MAX related to changing the IP address of a remote
VISA system.
Calling viParseRsrcEx would in some cases output the resource class using
the same case you used in the resource string in the input parameter. The
output parameter should always be uppercase. This is fixed.
For a Serial INSTR resource, calling viGetAttribute on VI_ATTR_ASRL_WIRE_MODE
would always output -1 if you hadn't yet set the mode for the given resource.
Now if you have NI-Serial 1.6 or higher installed with supported hardware,
it will output the default configured state rather than -1. Otherwise it
will still output -1. Note that NI-Serial 1.6 does not implement this
feature on all currently supported NI RS-485 controllers.

Similar Messages

Versions difference in ecc 6.0

Hello experts,
What are the major and minor difference between the 4.6c and ECC 6.0
Please tell me the diffences
Thanks
Raghava

There are so many differences between the version in different objects
I will explain in two or more objects the difference
1 in the customer master in 4.6 version there is no partner function tab in the customer in xd01 t-code
and also there is no CIN tab in that version
but it is there in the 4.7 EE version
This is the major change from the 4.6cc to 4.7EE
2. in 4.7EE there is some settings that are related for CIN
which cannot be done in 4.7EE that means they need some patches for doing the configuration setting for the CIN
But we can do the same in the 6.0 version
These are the some of the settings that are differed in the two versions and in that two objects
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fc/e3003deddfae4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/28/b34c40cc538437e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Re: Difference Between SAP Version ECC 4.6, 4.7, SAP 5.0, 6.0 with SA
Re: SAP version differences 4.5b, 4.6c and ECC6.0
You can find the difference in release notes of each SAP version.
Here are the links.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fc/e3003deddfae4de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm50/helpdata/en/28/b34c40cc538437e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/43/68805bb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Please visit the following links:
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
rewards if it helps

How to make a communication of two VIs from difference computers throught VI server?

how to make a communication of two VIs from difference computers throught VI server?
I have built the program which is attached at below. But it doesn't work. Can any one help me?
Attachments:
panel5.vi ‏82 KB

Hi Barry,
What do you mean "it doesn't work"? What kind of errors are you seeing? Also, you only specified the file name (data.vi) when opening a VI reference. Try specifying the whole path to the VI. Also, you might want to make sure you are able to ping your other computer from the start (to see if this is a LabVIEW issue or a network issue).
Hope this helps,
Travis H.
LabVIEW R&D
National Instruments

Java, Jardiff Version Difference

HI,
we are using JAva Web Start to launch our application. in our application, we also have used version based implementarion. it is working fine & only JArdiff is getting returned.
However, there are some of our JARs which get automatically updated. If somebody from the front end generates the property file, JAR gets updated with required changes in version & jnlp change also. Generation of property files is a frequent thing. So if anybody for long time does not log in, the version of propery JAR on his machine will be much older than the latest version.
whenever such problem occurs, sometimes JArDiff doesn't wrk properly. It gives the message " missing signed entries" On checking for signing files, we found those files are intact & also get downloaded on client machine But after that JWS stalls giving above message. This problem occurs if the version difference is too much else it does not happen.
Also, server log shows that JARDiff is returned perfectly. I'm not getting why exactly the problem exixts & why it occurs only at few client machines. Can anybody throw light on this? pls..

Can you tell us what versions of Java Web Strat and Java are you running ?
/Dietz

Version differences were generated in structure KOMP.

Our company is going to upgrade ECC 6.0 version.
So I tried to test in 6.0 test system.
When I executed in SPDD T-CODE, I compared with prior 4.7 version
system.
I found that KOMP strucure is differ from 4.7 system version.
So errr is generated because version was not same.
I wish to adjust difference with 4.7 system version .
Answer me how version differences were not generated.

Hey,
I think it was added in 4.6B version.You can do one thing.
Go to SE11>KOMP table->system->status>Component version->one search icon is there,click that.
There you can find out whatever modifications are done with the table.
Shout me again if any other clarification is required.
And also don't forget to reward points
Thanks.

Did "LabVIEW DIAdem Connectivity VIs Version 3.0" work with Diadem10 & LabVIEW8?

Did "LabVIEW DIAdem Connectivity VIs Version 3.0" work with Diadem10 & LabVIEW8?
Or will there be newer version of LabVIEW DIAdem Connectivity VIs released?

Hi zenith,
We have done tests with LabVIEW 8.0 and DIAdem 10 using the DIAdem Connectivity VIs version 3.0. These VIs should work fine and version 3.0 actually ships on the DIAdem 10 CD. However, if you do find any bugs please let us know. Thanks
Best Regards,
Jonathan N.
National Instruments

Sharing my script to show version difference of installed packages

Hi all.
Sometimes I don't want to just pacman -Syu. There are many packages that are big but introduce only minor bugfixes (usually libreoffice packages* are the culprits), so I don't want to have to install those.
This is something I cooked up a while ago to show version difference of currently installed packages with the latest packages in repository.
It's in python3, and uses python-termcolor.
It outputs something like this:
acl : 2.2.52-1 --> 2.2.52-2
archlinux-keyring : 20130926-1 --> 20131027-1
bison : 3.0-1 --> 3.0.1-1
cracklib : 2.9.0-1 --> 2.9.0-2
Here is the script:
#!/usr/bin/python3
from subprocess import check_output
from termcolor import colored
pacman_out=check_output(["pacman","-Sl"], universal_newlines=True).split("\n")
outlist = []
len_pkgname = 0
len_majver = 0
len_newver = 0
len_oldver = 0
for pkgs in pacman_out:
if not "[installed" in pkgs:
continue
if "[installed]" in pkgs:
continue
pkg_split = pkgs.split(" ")
newver = pkg_split[2]
oldver = pkg_split[4].rstrip("]")
for i in range(min(len(newver),len(oldver))):
if newver[i] != oldver[i]:
break
pkgname = pkg_split[1]
majver = newver[:i]
oldver = oldver[i:]
newver = newver[i:]
outlist.append((pkgname, majver, newver, oldver))
len_pkgname = max(len_pkgname, len(pkgname))
len_majver = max(len_majver, len(majver))
len_newver = max(len_newver, len(newver))
len_oldver = max(len_oldver, len(oldver))
for (pkgname, majver, newver, oldver) in outlist:
print("{}: {}{} --> {}{}".format(
pkgname.ljust(len_pkgname),
colored(majver.rjust(len_majver),"cyan"),
colored(oldver.ljust(len_oldver),"cyan",attrs=["bold"]),
colored(majver.rjust(len_majver),"magenta"),
colored(newver.ljust(len_newver),"magenta",attrs=["bold"])))
I hope pkgbrowser will include something like this in the future.
P/S: * these packages will break anyway in the event the dependencies has had some ABI changes.
EDIT: swapped new and old version columns. Thanks, karol!
Last edited by syockit (2013-12-04 17:55:42)

syockit wrote:I hope pkgbrowser will include something like this in the future.
Why not suggest adding this feature?
Currently it shows only the version that is going to be installed https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 3#p1316573
I've mated pacman's checkupdates with my old script https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 80#p829780
$ diff -Naur /usr/bin/checkupdates ch
--- /usr/bin/checkupdates 2013-10-21 14:04:37.000000000 +0000
+++ ch 2013-12-04 18:46:52.792101792 +0000
@@ -37,7 +37,11 @@
mkdir -p "$CHECKUPDATES_DB"
ln -s "${DBPath}/local" "$CHECKUPDATES_DB" &> /dev/null
fakeroot pacman -Sy --dbpath "$CHECKUPDATES_DB" --logfile /dev/null &> /dev/null
-pacman -Qqu --dbpath "$CHECKUPDATES_DB" 2> /dev/null
+
+conf=${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/checkup-db-${USER}/pacman.conf
+grep -v "^Ignore" /etc/pacman.conf > $conf
+
+/usr/bin/paste -d " " <(/usr/bin/printf "%-20.20s %-12s => \n" $(/usr/bin/pacman -Qu)) <(/usr/bin/pacman -Sdp --config $conf --print-format "%v" $(/usr/bin/pacman -Qqu --dbpath "$CHECKUPDATES_DB" 2> /dev/null))
exit 0
$ ./ch
libpipeline 1.2.4-1 => 1.2.5-1
No colors though.
Last edited by karol (2013-12-04 18:55:03)

SAP R/3 versions differences

Hi Gurus,
What are the differences between SAP R/3- 4.6C, 4.7 and ECC 5.0 Version in SD Module prospective and over all SAP R/3? It has been asked in many interviews.
Hope your reply very soon,
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Vamsi.

HI
There are so many differences between the version in different objects
I will explaint in two or more objects the differece
1 in the customer master in 4.6 version there is no partner function tab in the customer in xd01 tcode
and also there is no CIN tab in that vrsion
Re: differnce b/n 4.7 and ecc 6.0
but itis there in the 4.7 EE version
This is the major change from the 4.6cc to 4.7EE
2. in 4.7EE there is some settings that are related for CIN
which cannot be done in 4.7EE that means they need some patches for doing the configuration setting for the CIN
But we can do the same in the 6.0 version
These are the some ofthe settings that are differed in the two versions and in that two objects
Re: Difference Between SAP Version ECC 4.6, 4.7, SAP 5.0, 6.0 with SA
Please follow the link below, you can download the Release notes for each realease of R/3 and ECC.
https://websmp210.sap-ag.de/releasenotesRelease Notes
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
Hope this helps you.
<b>
Do award points if you found them useful.</b>

What are the version differences for the Zen Mic

I have the version that only allows you to upload songs from XP, and I have a 2000 computer. What are the differences between the version I have and the previous version and is it good or bad or downgrade my Micro?

Its the firmware on the player. Check out <a href='http://www.nomadness.net/modules.php?name=FAQ&myfaq=yes&id_cat=8&categories =Nomad+Jukebox+Zen#227' target=_blank>this FAQ[/url] for more on the difference between the v2 firmware and the v firmware.
You can flash back to a v firmware if you find a Windows XP machine to do the change and you will get your Micro to work with Creative's programs.

SAP Version Difference

What is the difference between SAP 4.7 c version and ECC 5.0 Version in aspect of material management module in both IMG Part and Easy Access Part .would any explain in detail ?

Hello Sadhish,
The following document explains about the additional functionalities and changes in ECC 5.0 compare to previous version.
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/1f/00d340fa1a732ae10000000a155106/Chap_13_MM.pdf">Release notes on MM</a>
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Understanding Target Cost Version Differences for 0 and 1 for process order

Our client need to understand the differences between our target cost versions that are utilized in calculating the process order CO03 cost analysis. When should each target version be used and why do the variances change? See example below.
Target Version = 1 Target Cost Prelim Order Cost Estimate
Version = 0 Target Cost for Prod Variances
Can you please provide analysis and help me on this.
I higly appreciate for your help.
Thanks in advance.
Seshadri

I recommend that you post this in CO forum.

Template Cross-Platform - Version Differences

I created a template in Dreamweaver 8 on a Mac and sent it to
a programmer using Dreamweaver MX on WIndows and the formatting for
him is messed up. Divs aren't lining up where I put them. He sent a
screen shot of his directory (which matches mine) and of the
template within DW MX and the divs are out of place.
Is this issue based on OS cross-platform, DW 8 to MX and
differences in how those versions handle MX or some other issue?
Thanks,
Brian

HTML is HTML, you know? It wouldn't make any difference if
you were
creating on a Mac, a PC, or a Linux box.
But - DMX is a dumb bunny when it comes to any advanced
layout methods. I
imagine the problem you are seeing is due to DMX's inability
to render CSS
layouts properly. Is your colleague using DMX6.0 or 6.1? If
the former,
they should at the least update to the latter immediately,
although that may
not fix the problems either.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
- Template Triage!
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
- Macromedia (MM) Technotes
==================
"yevri" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:fce162$kui$[email protected]..
>I created a template in Dreamweaver 8 on a Mac and sent
it to a programmer
> using Dreamweaver MX on WIndows and the formatting for
him is messed up.
> Divs
> aren't lining up where I put them. He sent a screen shot
of his directory
> (which matches mine) and of the template within DW MX
and the divs are out
> of
> place.
>
> Is this issue based on OS cross-platform, DW 8 to MX and
differences in
> how
> those versions handle MX or some other issue?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Brian
>

Certain properties arent beiing set (JDK-Version difference 1.2.1 & 1.3.1)

Hello alltogether
I'm extending a software which was once written on the JDK 1.2.1. For my extenstions i choosed to used the JDK 1.3.1. Now that i m done with my part, i remarked that the existing part of the webapplication doesnt run correctly on a server with JDK 1.3.1, and my extensions doesnt run on a server with JDK 1.2.1.
So what i m gonna do is, i have to make the existing system runnable on JDK 1.3.1, so that the whole system can be run on the server with JDK 1.3.1.
The problem i have with the existing version, is that the properties arent beeing set.
An example:
The request string is:172.16.1.38:8080/SupportSystem/issuelist.jsp?ident=3&command=closed
issuelist.jsp has uses the bean IssueBean and sets all its properties:
<jsp:useBean id="issueBean" scope="request" class="ch.msw.support.beans.IssueBean" />
<jsp:setProperty name="issueBean" property="*" />
IssueBean's property-setter method for the look like the follows:
public void setIdent(String newValue) {
if(newValue != null) {
    try {
      id=Integer.parseInt(newValue);
    } catch (Exception e) {}
}the command-property and the properties which are part of my enhancements are always beiing set. But the strange thing is that i cant find a difference between the functioning ones and the ones who fail
My supposition is that the 2 JDK - versions (1.2.1 / 1.3.1) implement different JSP-specifications which are featuring a difference with the property-setter-calling.
I cant figure how i could solve the problem...
maybe you can :-)
Thanks in advance!!!

What you have should work so I don't have a quick fix, only suggestions on how to track down the problem.
Presumably you must have recompiled IssueBean to add the new properties, so the java version is irrelevant. Ident is just as much a 1.3.1 property as is command.
Is the getIdent() method defined correctly? It must be "public String getIdent()" If, say, you are returning an int then the getter/setter pair may not be recognized by jsp:setProperty.
Try temporarily adding a System.out.println statement to setIdent so you know when it is called. Retest. If it is not called, add an explicit call to your JSP.
Add code to your JSP to print out all parameters. This will show whether ident is being passed through.
Good luck.

Import terminated version difference!

i exported from oracle 8.1.6 and want to import in 8.1.5
but due to difference in character sets it wasn't possible. also where can i find previous version exp
so that i can export from it?

As Karen explained above, you can run exp out of the Oracle 8.1.5 Home against the 8.1.6 db.
8.1.5          8.1.6
   ___     |    ___
(db1)    |   (db2)
(___)    |   (___)
1. exp <-----/
2. imp    |yeah :)
For 1 to work you will have to define an alias for the connection to db2. Look in, make a backup copy, and edit the file HOME/network/admin/tnsnames.ora (connection info should include hostname/IP and db2 SID)
After you have edit tnsnames.ora, test connection alias with sqlplus system/password@your_alias.
Then it goes something like this:
1. exp dba2/pw@your_alias file=db2.dmp other_exp_parameters
2. imp dba1/pw file=db2.dmp other_imp_parameters
Hth
Fredrik

Versions difference

What is are the basic differences between R/3 4.7 version and ECC 5 as far as SD module is concerned?

Hi,
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Give Source and Target Version)
Go through the release notes in help link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/c6/feda40ebccb533e10000000a155106/frameset.htm
Table of contents in there:
12 SD Sales and Distribution 1
12.1 SD-BF Basic Functions 1
12.1.1 SD-BF-EC Extra Charge 1
12.1.1.1 Extra Charge and Part Load Lift Orders in SAP ECC 5.00 1
12.1.1.2 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 1
12.1.2 SD-BF-AS Material Sorting 2
12.1.2.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 2
12.2 SD-SLS Sales 3
12.2.1 SD-SLS-GF Basic Functions 3
12.2.1.1 3
12.2.2 SD-SLS-PLL Part Load Lift Orders 6
12.2.2.1 Extra Charge and Part Load Lift Orders in SAP ECC 5.00 6
12.2.2.2 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 6
12.2.3 SD-SLS-RE Complaints 7
12.2.3.1 SD-SLS-RE-SR Sales Returns 7
12.2.3.1.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 7
12.3 SD-BIL Billing 8
12.3.1 SD-BIL-GF Basic Functions 8
12.3.1.1 8
12.3.2 SD-BIL-EM Empties Management 11
12.3.2.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 11
12.3.3 SD-BIL-RB Rebate Processing 12
12.3.3.1 SD-BIL-RB-PL Pendulum List Indirect Sales 12
12.3.3.1.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 12
12.3.3.2 SD-BIL-RB-ENH Extended Rebate 13
12.3.3.2.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 13
12.4 SD-CH Contract Handling 14
12.4.1 SAP Beverage Functions Available for the C
Industry 14
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Naveen.

NI VISA Version Differences

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for