"No entry in the table T589A for P" in PPOME's custom Tab

<u>requisites:</u><b> Add one custom Tab to transaction PPOME relative to Position (Object type S)</b>
<u>problem:</u><b>"No entry in the table T589A for P" </b> when entering the transaction PPOME, and choose my new added Tab.</b>
I get this error message <b>"No entry in the table T589A for P" </b> when entering the transaction PPOME, and choose my new added Tab.
The thing is, if I comment the line "MODULE BEFORE_OUTPUT" in subscreen 7000 of the infotype (the tab is infotype specific) this error disappear. But then the data entered in the tab, which should be relative to one position (type S), is now displayed for all positions. When leaving the transaction, and entering again, in the same tab, the data has disappeared.
I think I should not comment this:  "MODULE BEFORE_OUTPUT"
Why is this error being raised, and what must I do do stop it?
Thank you.

The table T589A is a configuration table pertaining to the pf status of the infotype. I changed the pf status of the infotype i.e. added my own buttons on application tool bar. May be cos of that it is giving error. Not sure.......

Similar Messages

  • Error message 'No entry in the table T589A for P 2'

    Hi all,
    I am updating the field of an infotype using the function module 'HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION'. But the function module is not updating the field. Instead the return key of the function module has the message
    'No entry in the table T589A for P2'. The function module is called as follows:
        infty                  = '9900'
        number                 = wf_pernr
        SUBTYPE                = P9900-SUBTY
      OBJECTID               =
      LOCKINDICATOR          =
        VALIDITYEND            = P9900-ENDDA
        VALIDITYBEGIN          = P9900-BEGDA
      RECORDNUMBER           =
        record                 = p9900
        operation              = 'MOD'
      TCLAS                  = 'A'
       DIALOG_MODE            = '0'
       NOCOMMIT               =
      VIEW_IDENTIFIER        =
      SECONDARY_RECORD       =
       RETURN                 = wf_return
       KEY                    = wf_key
    Please suggest.

    The table T589A is a configuration table pertaining to the pf status of the infotype. I changed the pf status of the infotype i.e. added my own buttons on application tool bar. May be cos of that it is giving error. Not sure.......

  • No entry in the table T528B for S 50001819

    Hi Guys,
    I have created all the positions using PPOME & now trying to hire people under PA40, but it gives above error.
    What could be the problem?

    Is this the first time you're hiring an employee after you've created the positions?
    Or have there been an upgrade in the system?
    Please make sure that the following entries are there in T77S0 table:
    Activate PLOGI feature via PE03.
    run all the RHINTEXX reports.
    Please also make sure that positions are in active status before assigning them to employees.
    Change status PO13 - Edit Status change - Activate --> If needed.
    Check the plan versions too.
    Edited by: Dilek Ersoz Adak on Dec 28, 2009 1:37 PM

  • Error "No entry in table T589A for P" while creating new Infotype

    I've created a new infotype (9605). All the tables, structures, screens etc. have been created using transaction PM01 successfully. But upon execution of Infotype from PA30, the infotype screen is displayed with the following error:
    "No entry in table T589A for P"
    Any input will be highly appreciated.
    Thank you,

    Hi Farooq,
    Untill and unless the the field PSYST-IOPER is cleared explicitly in the program MP960500 (in PBO modules), this error should not occur.
    Also is this error is coming only for 9605 infotype ? Also is any other info availaible in the error message such as entry in table t589a is not available for which value of OPERA (INS, MOD, DEL, LIS etc) ?

  • "No entry in table T589A for P" for HR Infotype

    Does anyone knows why do I encounter this msg "No entry in table T589A for P" when I run HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION for a specific customised Infotype.  I am actually doing a Update operation that I encountered this problem.
    Hope to hear from u soon.  Will Award points for solution provided.
    Lawrence Boey

    Hi lawrence,
    1. For the paramter OPERATION
        in the FM,
       pass valid values like
    2. For update, the value is MOD
    3. All valid values are contained in table T589A.
    amit m.

  • PM01 - Custom Infotype "No entry in table T589A for P"

    I created a custom PA Infotype with PM01 and now get error "No entry in table T589A for P". T589A is a table with function codes e.g. DIS, INS, LIS and also "P" & "Z". T589A is read when the dynamic PF-STATUS processing is done for Infotypes. I'm trying to do an insert with INS, but as the program tries to read from T589A, field PSYST-IOPER is blank. Any advice? Please assist. Thanks, Adrian

    Just had to regenerate

  • How to change the data type in the table ESLL for the field USERF2_NUM ?

    Hello Friends,
    I have a requirement in which one of the change is to convert the data type of the field 'USERF2_NUM' in the table 'ESLL'  from 'QUAN' to 'CHAR'. 
    How do i do it if i have an access to change it..........i think i should also check the impact of the change if done.
    Kindly tell me as my requirement starts with this small change.
    Rajesh Kumar

    Thanks for the reply Sowmya.
    I would like to know 2 things.
    1. Is it ok to change the data type of the field 'USERF2_NUM '  which is in the table ESLL. from quan to char.
    2.  The table ESLL  already has entries. if we change the data type from QUAN to CHAR what is the  effect on the existing entries of the table .
    Kindly reply me back.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajesh Kumar

  • What are the table names for CRM and APO?

    hi friends,
    what are the table names for CRM and APO?

    hi Suneel,
    check in crm forum
    Re: SAP-CRM Tables
    BUT051 BP Relationship: Contact Person Relationship
    Similar to BUT050 , additionally contains Contact Person’s Address data
    BUT0BK Business Partner: Bank Data & Details
    BP Number, Bank Key, Bank Country Key, Bank Account Number
    BNKA Bank Master Data
    BUT100 BP: Roles
    ADR2 Telephone Numbers (Business Address Services)
    ADR6 SMTP Numbers (Business Address Services)
    Contains Email – Id of the BP.
    ADRC Addresses (Business Address Services)
    BP’s Complete Address Details- City, Country, Post Code, District, Street, Title No Etc
    TSAD3T Table containing the Title text against a Title No.
    COMM_PRODUCT Master Table for Product
    CRMM_BUAG Master table for Business Agreement
    CRMM_BUAG_H Header Data for Business Agreement such as Tax Category, Tax Characteristic, Form key, Business Agreement Class. Data in this table correspond to ISU CRMD_ORDERADM_H Contains the Header Information for a Business Transaction.
    1. It doesn’t store the Business Partner
    responsible for the transaction. To
    get the Partner No, link it with
    2. This table can be used for search
    based on the Object Id(Business
    Transaction No).
    CRMD_CUSTOMER_H Additional Site Details at the Header Level of a Business Transaction
    CRMC_PROC_TYPE Master table Business Transaction Type
    CRMC_PARTNER_FCT Definition of Partner Functions
    SCPRIOT Priorities for Activities with priority text.
    CRMC_PROC_TYPE_T Text for a transaction type
    CRMC_ACT_OBJ_T Objective Number and Text for Activities
    TJ30T All the status code and text
    CRMC_PR_ASSIGN : Transaction Type and its Transaction Type Object.
    IBIB : Installed Base/Ibase
    IBIN : Installed Base Components
    COMM_PRODUCT : Products
    CRMC_T077D : customer account groups
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H (for header) CRMD_ORDERADM_I (Item data)
    CRMD_ORDERADM_H Business Transactions CRM
    CRMD_ACTIVITY_H Activity
    CRMD_OPPORT_H Opportunity
    BUTOO : Customer details
    BUT001 BP: General data II
    BUT100 BP: Roles
    BUT150 BP relationship: Attribute table (test
    BUT_HIER_TREE Business Partner Group Hierarchy
    CDBC_T_PRODUCTID Mapping: Product Id
    CDBD_ORGMAN Business transaction - organizational unit -
    COMC_PRODUCT General Product Settings
    COMC_R3_FIELDS Assignment of R/3 material master fields to
    COMM_CATEGORY Category
    COMM_CFGMAT Basic Data for Materials
    COMM_HIERARCHY Category Hierarchy
    COMP_TYPES Hierarchy Tool: Comparison Type Check
    CRMC_CPRICPROC Customer Pricing Procedures
    SMOKVBEZ15 Assignment employees to positions
    CRMMLSGUID: GUID entry (should match GUID in CRMPRLS)
    CRMM_BUT_CUSTNO : Also GUID table (GUID here should match GUID in R/3 table CRMKUNNR)
    SMOFSUBTAB : Mapping & Parameters
    SMOFDSTAT : Download Monitor (R4AM1)
    SMOFFILTAB : Filters (Should match filters in R3AC1 & R/3 Table CRMFILTAB)
    SMOFOBJECT Definition of Objects for Download
    SMOFOBJPAR Parent Objects of an Object in Table
    SMOFPARSFA Middleware Parameter
    SMOFQFIND Queue Finder Table for MW-Queue finder
    SMOFTABLES Definition of Tables for Download

  • CUA:  Wrong entries in the table USZBVSYS

    Hi All,
    While searching a particular user access to the child systems via SUIM - > Users by system, the report given output that the user have access to so and so system. Whereas that user already deleted and there is no user account in CUA and the respective child system.
    When i search in the table USZBVSYS, that user having a entry to that child system with status S.
    May be due to some old IDOC get processed and made an entry in this table but physical the changes were not made either in CUA or in child system.
    Now my concern is how to delete such type of entries in the table USZBVSYS?
    SAP recommended not to use the report RSUSR_CUA_CLEANUP_USZBVSYS and i think it can be resolve only by manually method to create and delete.
    Kindly let me know you opinion pls.

    RSUSR_CUA_CLEANUP_USZBVSYS cannot work in this case, as you have 'S'-entries for the user section  in uszbvsys. The report will clean up only entries with D,A or X entry for the user entry.
    So there seems to be no automated standard report for your query.
    I suggest to collect the user-IDs you need to remove, copy them into SU10, recreate them for the required systems and delete them
    afterwards again.
    Make sure, that nobody processes cua-idocs manually in any of your systems of the cua. Only use scul.
    b.rgds, Bernhard

  • No entry found in table SMOFQFIND for BDoc type SI_CONTRACT

    Hi Gurus,
    I try to do a request dowload for SI_CONTRACT object.
    When  execute and monitor my request objects the status is OK.
    Then, I check the BDocs Message Trace and I see the following  error
    "No entry found in table SMOFQFIND for BDoc type SI_CONTRACT - Queue name used: CRI_SI_CONTRACT (see note 677800 for further info"
    Does anyone know how to resolve this issue?
    [email protected]

    Hi Brian,
    There was leading 0 for the contract # in the request detail, however this message is still in the BDoc message trace. The BDoc was posted successfully. I checked the table SMOFQFIND and could not find the entry for BDoc type SI_CONTRACT.
    There are records for SI_CONNOBJ and SI_POD which are all delivered by SAP. I think we just need to maintain SI_CONTRACT in this table to get rid of this message. Just I do not know what exact to maintain for SI_CONTRACT.
    Could you help to check standard SAP environment to see what is the detail for SI_CONTRACT in table SMOFQFIND?

  • Delete any entry in the table before adding an entry?

    Hello ABAP Experts,
    I have the data in the work area. I can modify / update / insert to the table.
    How to write the ABAP code for this situation.
    1) to delete any entries in the table
    2) update this entry
    so finally always there would be only one entry.
    Suggestions appreciated.

    Delete the entries of table by this stmt.
    DELETE FROM (dbtabname).
    Then insert the values from workarea
    INSERT INTO dbtab VALUES <work_area>.
    And u can upadte the entry with values of workarea by this stmr.
    UPDATE (dbtabname) FROM wa.
    Dont use MODIFY. It will add a new record if its a new entry.

  • 0HR_PT_1 Extraction issue No entry in HR table T569R for 0106

    hi experts,
    we are implementing Time and Labour cube, and trying to extracting from ECC to BW cube (0PT_C01).
    when i extract data from 0HR_PT_1 data source the PSA Request is in yellow for a long time. when i check the issue in ECC. Its giving the below issues.
    No entry in HR table T569R for 0106
    No entry in HR table T569R for 0105
    No personal work schedule for personnel number 00013090
    No personal work schedule for personnel number 00013145
    No personal work schedule for personnel number 00500009
    No personal work schedule for personnel number 00500026
    How to rectify the above issues and the load make successful?

    Do the below things, as per the note 696836.
    By using the view V_T569R, maintain the retroactive categories
    1. 05 'Earliest time data carry-over'
    2. 06 'Latest time data carry-over'
    which constitute the time frame, in which the system will perform an extraction. Outside this time frame, the system will neither select any data nor calculate any delta. SAP recommends that you choose a period that includes approximately the current year. You have to maintain and update this time window periodically.
    Anil Kumar Sharma. P

  • Problem with the XI-Audit log entries in the table "XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT"

    I have an async-szenarios for PO:
    We send Idoc's from SAP ERP to a WebService via SOAP. And we take Ack's. We use Integrationsprocess with deadline block to catche the errors after the retrying (three times) and to send they via e-mail.
    Our problem is, the number of the audit logs in the table "XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT":
    In the RTW only we see one audit log (with three retries) in an error case. But in the table XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT there are about 76 entries for the same audit log in the error case and about 20 entries in the case of the succuessfull processing.
    This number of the entries in the table causes problem with the size of the redo log file and delete job of cours the large size of the table and therefore problem on the data base. The table can not be controlled. The delete job can not run and cancels every time due this redo log problems
    What can cause that?
    How can it be prevented, that so much entries are not be made in the  table "XI_AF_MSG_AUDIT".
    Best regards

    Hi Gueltekin,
    I am only aware of the general property auditLogEnabled of J2EE Engine Service SAP XI AF Core, which controls in general (default = true) that entries in the AF Message Audit log are written at all.
    (see [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/5c/22ee41c334c717e10000000a155106/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/5c/22ee41c334c717e10000000a155106/frameset.htm])
    I assume that your scenarios in the error case is sending up to three messages and for each message the number of audit log infos are created. You might want to check the detailed entries in the log and see from where they are comming, you might use customer modules etc. as well.
    Best regards,

  • Transporting the entries of the table TSTCT

    Dear All,
    Is there a way to transport the entries of the table TSTCT.
    I've tried the procedure specified in the below link, but it is not working for the T*  tables.
    <link to blocked site removed by moderator>
    Please suggest if there is a way.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 6, 2012

    HI ,
    Check this [Thread|transport system objects i.e. contents of table t100 from one system to ano; , in that they have tried to transport T001 , And replies have few links check that too , will help you to transporting the entries of the table TSTCT.

  • Multiple entries in the table cabn

    Can Anyone tell me how is it possible to have multiple entries of the same "atnam" field in the table CABN.
    It has something to do with changing number.
    Because I used a wrong select-instruction e.g.
    select atnam in charact where .... IN ....
    So, I shoud used
    select DISTINCT atnam in charact where .... IN ....
    So, I'm gone need to try to put multiple entries in the table to check, if it's working well.
    Thanks a lot.
    Best Regards,

    If I understand your Q - you mean there are two ATINN for the same ATNAM in your CABN table?
    I dont think that's possible. If you check CT04 and try to create a new characteristic with same name as an existing one - it will give you a warning and prevent creation.
    Since you say it's a standard characteristic - please mention the characteristic name (ATNAM)?

Maybe you are looking for