No SSL VPN tunnel from AnyConnect to IOS

Dear all
Due to the annoying WWAN issues with the old Cisco VPN client (IPsec) I am trying to establish remote access to a LAN behind a Cisco 1803 using Anyconnect and SSL VPN.
But I simply cannot make it work.
I have a Cisco 1803 running IOS Version 12.4(15)T15 and I have tried Anyconnect 3.0 and 2.4 on Windows XP and MacOS 10.5, none of them established a VPN connection to the router, saying not a single word more but "Connection attempt has failed".
Here is my configuration on the router:
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-595019360
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-595019360
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-595019360
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-595019360
certificate self-signed 01
3082024E 308201B7 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
[......skipped....]
interface Loopback123
ip address 192.168.123.254 255.255.255.0
ip local pool GS-POOL 192.168.123.1 192.168.123.10
webvpn gateway GS-GW
hostname GS-VPN-test
ip address x.x.x.x port 443
ssl trustpoint TP-self-signed-595019360
inservice
webvpn install svc flash:/webvpn/svc.pkg
webvpn context GS-CONTEXT
ssl authenticate verify all
policy group GS-POLICY
functions svc-required
svc address-pool "GS-POOL"
default-group-policy GS-POLICY
gateway GS-GW
inservice
These are my debug settings:
#sh debug
WebVPN Subsystem:
WebVPN (verbose) debugging is on
debug webvpn entry GS-CONTEXT
WebVPN HTTP (verbose) debugging is on
WebVPN AAA debugging is on
WebVPN tunnel (verbose) debugging is on
WebVPN Single Sign On debugging is on
And these are all debug messages I get upon incoming connection:
Sep 13 13:12:03.267 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:12:03.271 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
At this poibnt I have to accept the self-sigbned certificate in the AnyConnect client. Doing so repeats these messages again five times. Then I hav to accept the certificate in the client a second time (WHY?) Then the router gives these messages:
Sep 13 13:14:10.754 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:10.754 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:10.766 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:10.766 MEST: WV: http request: / with no cookie
Sep 13 13:14:10.766 MEST: WV-HTTP: Deallocating HTTP info
Sep 13 13:14:10.766 MEST: WV: Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54AA0 total_len=191 bytes=191 tcb=0x85066820
Sep 13 13:14:10.766 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.050 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.054 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.354 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.354 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: http request: /webvpn.html with domain cookie
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV-HTTP: Deallocating HTTP info
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: [Q]Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54AA0 total_len=1009 bytes=1009 tcb=0x83DABBF4
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: [Q]Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54A80 total_len=1009 bytes=1009 tcb=0x83DABBF4
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: [Q]Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54A60 total_len=1009 bytes=1009 tcb=0x83DABBF4
Sep 13 13:14:11.366 MEST: WV: [Q]Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54A40 total_len=1009 bytes=1009 tcb=0x83DABBF4
Sep 13 13:14:11.370 MEST: WV: Client side Chunk data written..
buffer=0x84E54A20 total_len=641 bytes=641 tcb=0x83DABBF4
Sep 13 13:14:11.370 MEST: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
At this point the Anyconnect client says "Connection attempt failed" and that's all.
So please, any advice how to solve this?
And do I have to install any particular svc.pkg in the flash? As far as I have found out you can install only one client package (how do you server different clients then?). But if I use permanently installed AnyConnect on my client system the installed svc.pkg on the router doesn't matter at all, right?
Thanks a lot for any suggestions,
Grischa

Some more restrictions:
12.4(15)T does not support Anyconnect in standalone mode, only web-launch (i.e. starting AC from the clientless portal). You need 12.4(20)T or later for standalone mode.
In addition with an untrusted certificate you will run into this bug which is not resolved in 12.4(15)T:
CSCtb73337 AnyConnect does not work with IOS if cert not trusted/name mismatch
In short, if it's possible to upgrade, go to 15.0(1)M7 (or latest 12.4(24)Tx if 15.0 is out of the question)
If you're stuck with 12.4(15)T, only use AC 2.x with weblaunch and make sure the host trusts the router's certificate (create a trustpoint, enroll it, import the certificate on the client into the trusted root store).
hth
Herbert

Similar Messages

SSL VPN Tunnel and Windows 7

Hi
I have a SA520W with firmware 2.1.18 and are having huge trouble getting windows 7 clients to connect using the SSL VPN Tunnel in Split mode. I've tested the registered users using an XP machine, and they are able to log in just fine and I can ping servers on the inside of the network. On windows 7, however, the VPN tunnel is created, but no IP trafic flows over the virtual network adapter and I'm not able to ping resources on the inside of the network. For the XP clients, the SSL VPN tunnel works like a charm, but not not 7.
Are there any consideration to be taken on windows 7 to enable trafic over the SSL VPN virtual network adapter?
Windows firewall?
SSL service?

Hi skcisco11,
You can alternatively use Cisco VPN Client if your SA520 has firmware version 2.1.18 and above. Here is a document how to set it up:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/multi_function_security/multi_function_security_appliance/sa_500/technote/note/SA500_vpnclient_appnote.pdf
Alternatively, please use the following document on how to setup SSL VPN. If you are using a local database on the SA520 to authenticate users,, then ignore the references to Active Directory.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/multi_function_security/multi_function_security_appliance/sa_500/technote/note/active_directory.pdf
Hope this helps,
Julio

Problems when trying to surf the Internet through a SSL VPN tunnel

Hi,
I have a small/big problem, I have a customer who have the need for the possibility to surf the internet through the SA500W when they are connected through a SSL VPN tunnel in to their network. I am not using a Split Tunnel. What I have seen until now, when you run IPCONFIG/ALL the default gateway for the SSL VPN IP settings is 0.0.0.0. Is this the problem and if so, how can this be solved?
Thanks in advance!
Brg
Niklas Eklov

There are various causes for this error, see [[Firefox is already running but is not responding]] for details.

Private vpn tunnel from behind NAT

Hello all,
Our provider suddenly refuses to give us public ip addresses. Instead we get a private one and the provider does nat.
Problem is this site has an IPSEC tunnel towards a public ip address for connectivity to main offices, the tunnel also runs BGP as routing protocol (so dynamic).
Is there a way to make this work ? I guess the client side needs to be forced into setting up the tunnel always and the tunnel must be kept alive with hello packets or something like that...
Any link to some good documentation would be appreciated ?
regards,
Geert

Trying to establish a vpn tunnel from a windows vpn client to a watchguard Firebox X700 VPN.
Thanks.

Cisco SSL-VPN / webvpn with Cisco 2901 IOS 15.3.3M

Dear Community,
I have a strange issue that I am hoping some of you will be able to assist with.
I am running an environment with the following specifications
Cisco ISR G2 2901 with IOS 15.3.3M
Security Licence enabled
Data Licence enabled
VPN Licence enabled
Cisco ISR G2 2951 with IOS 15.3.3M
Security Licence enabled
Data Licence enabled
SM with ESX server.
Desktop Environment
Windows XP SP3
Internet Explorer 8
Desktop Environment 2
Windows 8
Internet Explorer 10
I have a ESX server set up with a web page on the 2951. The 2901 unit has a SSL VPN / web vpn service set up on it to allow the Desktop Environments to connect to the 2951 web page. The Desktop Environments are not allowed to directly connect to the 2951 router that is why the SSL-VPN / web vpn is used.
This system was initially working with IOS 15.2.4M2 however an update of the IOS was required and now the VPN does not fully function correctly.
PROBLEM: Now the webvpn interface loads with the welcome screen and login. After logging in it has a screen with a link to the webpage on the 2951. When I try open this webpage on the 2951 and the SSL-VPN starts to build I only get half my web page. There seems to be a problem where I only get half a page loading or just a blank page with just HTML headers. I have tried changing the page to just HTML but it still does not display properly. This is with Internet Explorer ( all versions ). With firefox there are no problems but I cannot run this browser as my environment will not allow it.
If anyone can assit me here it would really make my day.
Thanks,
Will

Can anyone help with this ?

SSL VPN with client, anyconnect.

I've set up a simple test on SSL VPN with client on a 3800.
It didnt work. I assume i have to turn on the IP http server so that the client can hit it.
but when I turned it on, the client goes to SDM, nothing with ssl vpn happened. it tells me the pay is not available.
The underlying routing is fine.
Could you tell me where it is configured wrong?
Config is copied below.
thanks,
Han
=======
Current configuration : 3340 bytes
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Router
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable password cisco
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa session-id common
no network-clock-participate slot 1
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3551041125
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-3551041125
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3551041125
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3551041125
certificate self-signed 01
3082024F 308201B8 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 33353531 30343131 3235301E 170D3131 31313135 31383238
30365A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D33 35353130
34313132 3530819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100CFCF CFFAD76A 50DA82C9 8D4E3F90 64AD24EB 5409C5E2 43BC64F3 07F6C0E0
29FF2D71 0DA0D897 2F814BD2 7F817503 429D4BC6 6AD6EEA4 DFA74BAD 0EAF84D5
6ED55EC0 6C637178 BEEBCD1D 184BB90C CA84E974 48003885 87B53F2E 36A04661
23DA2CBB DD8EEE1D 2F25AF9A E21DC288 BF76A17C C1F4BA07 95F09377 A12BE01A
53750203 010001A3 77307530 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 30220603
551D1104 1B301982 17526F75 7465722E 776E7362 6E6F632E 696E7465 726E616C
301F0603 551D2304 18301680 14BE9E8F ED788928 560D7CA1 EED89B0D DE34D772
5D301D06 03551D0E 04160414 BE9E8FED 78892856 0D7CA1EE D89B0DDE 34D7725D
300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050003 818100BC 4A2A3C47 7BF809AF 78EE0FD9
73692913 F280765E BAFAECAB ED32C38D 3030810B C62C7F45 13C8A6EE AE96A891
CDD4C78B 803299AD EB098B27 383CEF6F 0E2B811F 3ECFADBA 07CD0AC6 BBB8C5FE
B2FC0FD8 562B7100 BB28036E 4575D1F5 B17687C6 8EACBD66 A9E52FEE A030E69A
CAAE9F1B 618FA59D 02C25BC8 77D6CAC2 C7E56F
quit
dot11 syslog
ip cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
username cisco1 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$L2RA$Zqs6FLce5Ns5fny5aRL49/
archive
log config
hidekeys
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address dhcp
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
end
interface Loopback1
ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address dhcp
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
ip local pool svc-poll 1.1.1.50 1.1.1.100
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
line con 0
logging synchronous
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
webvpn gateway SSLVPN
ip interface GigabitEthernet0/0 port 443
ssl trustpoint local
inservice
webvpn install svc flash:/webvpn/svc.pkg
webvpn context SSLVPN
ssl authenticate verify all
policy group default
   functions svc-required
   svc default-domain "test.org"
   svc keep-client-installed
   svc split dns "primary"
default-group-policy default
gateway SSLVPN
inservice
end

Using the SDM follow the below config example
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6496/products_configuration_example09186a008071c58b.shtml
The text "cisco 3800 ssl vpn configuration" in my favorite search engine, identified the above.
HTH>

Problem establishing SSL VPN from only 1 IP address

Hi,
I'm experiencing strange problem.
I can't establish SSL VPN connection from 1 IP address, but I don't have problem establishing SSL VPN from any other IP address.
Remote IP address: 10.0.0.1
ASA's public IP address: 192.168.1.1
Output of packet-tracer:
1. with problematic source IP address:
packet-tracer input wan tcp 10.0.0.1 50601 192.168.1.1 443 detailed
Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   192.168.1.1   255.255.255.255 identity
Phase: 2
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Implicit Rule
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff37573f00, priority=119, domain=permit, deny=false
        hits=861, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 3
Type: CONN-SETTINGS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff38a10a50, priority=8, domain=conn-set, deny=false
        hits=4069, user_data=0x7fff38770910, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 4
Type: IP-OPTIONS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff395c7d70, priority=0, domain=inspect-ip-options, deny=true
        hits=4044934, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=any
Phase: 5
Type: VPN
Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff37560700, priority=13, domain=ipsec-tunnel-flow, deny=true
        hits=2268518, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=any
Phase: 6
Type: TCP-MODULE
Subtype: webvpn
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff38a10cc0, priority=13, domain=soft-np-tcp-module, deny=false
        hits=4627, user_data=0x7fff38c14300, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 7
Type: VPN
Subtype: encrypt
Result: DROP
Config:
Additional Information:
Reverse Flow based lookup yields rule:
out id=0x7fff375504a0, priority=69, domain=encrypt, deny=false
        hits=40747, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x7fff3754fa40, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0
        dst ip/id=10.0.0.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=any, output_ifc=wan
Result:
input-interface: wan
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: NP Identity Ifc
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
If I run packet-tracer with any other source IP address, let's say 10.0.0.2, everything is OK:
packet-tracer input wan tcp 10.0.0.2 50601 192.168.1.1 443 de
Phase: 1
Type: ROUTE-LOOKUP
Subtype: input
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
in   192.168.1.1   255.255.255.255 identity
Phase: 2
Type: ACCESS-LIST
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Implicit Rule
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff37573f00, priority=119, domain=permit, deny=false
        hits=862, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 3
Type: CONN-SETTINGS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff38a10a50, priority=8, domain=conn-set, deny=false
        hits=4090, user_data=0x7fff38770910, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 4
Type: IP-OPTIONS
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff395c7d70, priority=0, domain=inspect-ip-options, deny=true
        hits=4047886, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=any
Phase: 5
Type: VPN
Subtype: ipsec-tunnel-flow
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff37560700, priority=13, domain=ipsec-tunnel-flow, deny=true
        hits=2270040, user_data=0x0, cs_id=0x0, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=any
Phase: 6
Type: TCP-MODULE
Subtype: webvpn
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Forward Flow based lookup yields rule:
in id=0x7fff38a10cc0, priority=13, domain=soft-np-tcp-module, deny=false
        hits=4648, user_data=0x7fff38c14300, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=6
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=192.168.1.1, mask=255.255.255.255, port=443, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=wan, output_ifc=identity
Phase: 7
Type: USER-STATISTICS
Subtype: user-statistics
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Reverse Flow based lookup yields rule:
out id=0x7fff3a1cc320, priority=0, domain=user-statistics, deny=false
        hits=4902651, user_data=0x7fff3a0043c0, cs_id=0x0, reverse, flags=0x0, protocol=0
        src ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0
        dst ip/id=0.0.0.0, mask=0.0.0.0, port=0, dscp=0x0
        input_ifc=any, output_ifc=wan
Phase: 8
Type: FLOW-CREATION
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
New flow created with id 4384689, packet dispatched to next module
Module information for forward flow ...
snp_fp_tracer_drop
snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
snp_fp_tcp_normalizer
snp_fp_tcp_mod
snp_fp_adjacency
snp_fp_fragment
snp_fp_drop
Module information for reverse flow ...
snp_fp_tracer_drop
snp_fp_inspect_ip_options
snp_fp_tcp_normalizer
snp_fp_adjacency
snp_fp_fragment
snp_ifc_stat
Result:
input-interface: wan
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: NP Identity Ifc
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: allow
I run packet capture on WAN interface - and I can only see incoming packets (SYN) with destination to tcp/443 but there isn't any outgoing packet (SYN/ACK).
I even can't open web page from internet browser (url https://192.168.1.1) when source IP is 10.0.0.1, but I can open "SSL VPN Service" web page from any other source IP address.
The only thing different with this IP address is that there's configured site-to-site (IPsec) vpn tunnel from same source to same destination IP address.
Here is the configuration of the tunnel:
group-policy GroupPolicy_10.0.0.1 internal
group-policy GroupPolicy_10.0.0.1 attributes
vpn-filter value VPN-ACL
vpn-tunnel-protocol ikev1 ssl-client
access-list VPN-ACL:
access-list VPN-ACL extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_83 object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_84
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_83
network-object 10.11.217.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_84
network-object 10.11.217.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
tunnel local & remote networks:
access-list wan_cryptomap_5 extended permit ip 10.11.217.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.201.0 255.255.255.0
crypto map wan_map 5 match address wan_cryptomap_5
crypto map wan_map 5 set connection-type answer-only
crypto map wan_map 5 set peer 10.0.0.1
crypto map wan_map 5 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
I've configured the same setup in my lab and I can't reproduce the error.
The SW version running on ASA is asa861-12.
I'm out of ideas.

Just collected some other information:
1. traceroute shows that traffic is not leaving ASA at all
1   * * *
2   * * *
3   * * *
I double checked that there is no "strange" entry for remote public IP in routing. Traffic with destination to remote IP should be sent via default gateway like all other traffic.
2. debug crypto ipsec shows this information when I ping public IP address of the remote host (with VPN
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-3: Looking for crypto map matching 5-tuple: Prot=1, saddr=192.168.1.1, sport=30647, daddr=10.0.0.1, dport=30647
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 1: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_1.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 2: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_2.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 3: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_3.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 4: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_4.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 5: skipping dormant map.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 5: skipping dormant map.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 6: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_6.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 7: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_7.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 8: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_8.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 9: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_9.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 10: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_10.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 11: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_11.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 13: skipping because 5-tuple does not match ACL wan_cryptomap_13.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-5: Checking crypto map wan_map 65535: skipping dynamic_link.
IPSEC(crypto_map_check)-1: Error: No crypto map matched.
It really seems that the whole problem is that ASA is trying to encrypt traffic sent from public IP address of one VPN endpoint and targeted to public IP address of another VPN endpoint and send it to remote VPN endpoint via IPcec tunel.
There is indeed VPN tunnel established between both VPN endpoints, but there are just local and remote networks defined with private IP address space for this tunnel, VPN endpoint's public IP addresses are not included in the definition of this IPsec VPN tunnel.
And there are at least two more IPsec VPN tunnels configured the same way and I can't reprodure this error on there two VPN tunnels.
Any idea?

SSL VPN and Dynamic DNS - ddns on IOS

Hello,
I'm trying to configure a SSL VPN tunnel via SDM on a 877 Router. The router gets the public IP address dynamically from the ISP, so I have configured the DDNS to access remotely to the router. I would like to know if it's possible to configure the SSL VPN to support the dynamic IP via SDM o CLI.
Regards
Gerard

Seems like i have fixed the problem using:
webvpn gateway gateway_1
ip interface Dialer0 port 443
ssl trustpoint local
inservice
However when the router is rebooted, it results in this error:
Invalid ip address First configure an IP address for the gateway
Any idea how to delay the webvpn commands at startup until dialer0 gets a dynamic IP ?

ASA 5505 site-to-site VPN tunnel and client VPN sessions

Hello all
I have several years of general networking experience, but I have not yet had to set up an ASA from the ground up, so please bear with me.
I have a client who needs to establish a VPN tunnel from his satellite office (Site A) to his corporate office (Site Z). His satellite office will have a single PC sitting behind the ASA. In addition, he needs to be able to VPN from his home (Site H) to Site A to access his PC.
The first question I have is about the ASA 5505 and the various licensing options. I want to ensure that an ASA5505-BUN-K9 will be able to establish the site-to-site tunnel as well as allow him to use either the IPsec or SSL VPN client to connect from Site H to Site A. Would someone please confirm or deny that for me?
Secondly, I would like to verify that no special routing or configuration would need to take place in order to allow traffic not destined for Site Z (i.e., general web browsing or other traffic to any resource that is not part of the Site Z network) to go out his outside interface without specifically traversing the VPN tunnel (split tunneling?)
Finally, if the client were to establish a VPN session from Site H to Site A, would that allow for him to connect directly into resources at Site Z without any special firewall security rules? Since the VPN session would come in on the outside interface, and the tunnel back to Site Z goes out on the same interface, would this constitute a split horizon scenario that would call for a more complex config, or will the ASA handle that automatically without issue?
I don't yet have the equipment in-hand, so I can't provide any sample configs for you to look over, but I will certainly do so once I've got it.
Thanks in advance for any assistance provided!

First question:
Yes, 5505 will be able to establish site-to-site tunnel, and he can use IPSec vpn client, and SSL VPN (it comes with 2 default SSL VPN license).
Second question:
Yes, you are right. No special routing is required. All you need to configure is site-to-site VPN between Site A and Site Z LAN, and the internet traffic will be routed via Site A internet. Assuming you have all the NAT statement configured for that.
Last question:
This needs to be configured, it wouldn't automatically allow access to Site Z when he VPNs in to Site A.
Here is what needs to be configured:
1) Split tunnel ACL for VPN Client should include both Site Z and Site A LAN subnets.
2) On site A configures: same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
3) Crypto ACL for the site-to-site tunnel between Site Z and Site A needs to include the VPN Client pool subnet as follows:
On Site Z:
access-list permit ip
On Site A:
access-list permit ip
4) NAT exemption on site Z needs to include vpn client pool subnet as well.
Hope that helps.
Message was edited by: Jennifer Halim

SSL VPN Connection error with SA520

Hi there,
I have an SA520 setup and all my users can login to the SSL VPN tunnel except one user. The laptop is running windows 7 64bit and had IE9 installed. When I try to connect her to use an SSL VPN Tunnel, I get the following error: Cisco-SSLVPN-Tunnel Install Failed: Error in getting proxy settings!.
I have made sure the firewall was turned off. Any idea on how to get the ssl tunel connected?
Thanks

Hihi,
we have the same problem, running on Vista 32 bit, and IE9.
On the same machine, using virtual PC and emulating an XP environment it works, what a paradox!
It works also on Win 7 64 bit, although only with the 64 bit version of IE.
Coming back to our Vista issue, we did not find any way to make it work properly.
Tried to turn off firewall, disinstall a lot of stuff that may interphere, etc. , still same problem.
We are a bit annoyed there seems to be no documentation about this error nor troubleshooting help.
Anyone has any suggestion ??
Tks

Disconnecting WEB SSL VPN client windows 7 to remote windows 7 virtual machine

Good morning,
          my problem, common to other colleagues who use Windows machines 7 Professional is this:
I connect to WEB SSL VPN Cisco from Client Windows 7 Home Premium Explorer-9 to a virtual machine Windows 7 Professional using a specific professional audience and vpn user. I access the Terminal Services window (attached JPG) with a list of links to virtual machines.I connect to the virtual machine in Remote Desktop Full Screen mode and log in with the same user and password. For the connection is installed an add-type control ActiveX CISCO Portforwarder Control version 3.1.0.1, file name -> cscopf.ocx.
Problem: The session window once inside the virtual machine disappears and disconnect from the virtual machine back in the window of choice of Terminal services available. This always happens and there is no way to maintain a stable connection.With modality not FULL SCREEN, the session window would seem to remain stable but however is impossible to work in a small window.
This problem is raised after the update windows 7 to SP1 both Home premium and Professional. In fact before the update the connection is stable. The update to SP1 update the RDP client microsoft to version 6.1.7601.17154 from version 6.1.7600 but i do not know if this the cause of the problem.
Have you an update of CISCO active-x to fix the problem? I cancelled the file and download the last version but the problem remains.
Workaround: Use local virtual machine with xp or windos 2003 and access form this operating system but I consider absurd to use a local
                    virtual machine to access a service which should be directed
Note: This problem does not occur if the VPN session to the virtual machine Windows 7 is launched from a host machine running Vista Home Premium with RDP Client 6.0. My previous PC had this OS and I was working in an absolutely stable by performing the same type of connection.
Host Operating System: OS Name Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
OS virtual machine accessed via ssl web vpn: OS Name Microsoft Windows 7 Professional Version 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1 Build 7601
Can you help?Thank you.
Carmelo Orlando
No

The same problem here as well.
I am using a Win7 PC to connect to an Win Vista PC via SSLVPN. Once i logged into the remote PC, the session is disconnected.
Do we have any corrections from Cisco for the moment?

2 VPN tunnels for failover

I am looking at turning up an amazon AWS windows server 2008 r2 datacenter instance and want to enable failover for a VPN tunnel in case one ISP goes down. 2 VPN tunnels from the server to a Dual WAN cisco router over 2 different ISPs - so that
if one ISP goes down, the other will work - while still providing for RDP access over the WAN IP.
How can this be done cost efficiently.

Not sure you'll get an answer here, this forum is for the Microsoft product Virtual Server 2005.
A forum that deals with AWS would be a better place to ask.

Can QoS be implemented when VPN tunnel bandwidth is unknown?

Is it possible to have some sort of QoS on both sides of a VPN tunnel when the speed at the endpoint is unknown. In other words is it possible to have QoS bandwidth parameters to be automatically detected/adapted to the actual bandwidth?

Hey Martin,
Thanks for your reply. I Think IntServ won't be a solution straight away, I'll try to explain what I would like to do.
What my issue is that I have a few locations who are kind of mobile, and each location connects to the internet via various links, depending on which is available. This link can be a normal ISP which blocks all traffic except port 80 and 443. The connection could be a simple ISDN dialin or a dedicated T1 link.
Because there is a Cisco VoIP router on the mobile location and some users' data should have precedence over others' I would like to implement QoS.
My idea was when I were able to set up a site-to-site SSL VPN tunnel to a router in a datacenter (using Array Network stuff if the Cisco can't do site-to-site SSL) I would have more control over the internetlink. I Would not be limited to using only port 80 and 443: all traffic would just go encrypted and look like normal HTTPS traffic.
It's likely that this VPN link would always consume the maximum available bandwidth. When it is be possible for some QoS mechanism to "detect" the speed of the VPN I could let's say dedicate bandwidth for 4 VoIP calls and the remaining bandwidth can be made available for normal traffic. Note that this normal traffic should have some priority levels too.
Assigning dedicated bandwidth to VoIP isn't a big problem I think, however how can I make x percentage of the remaining bandwidth available to user x and y percentage available to user y?
I Hope I wrote it understandable ;).
Regards

Cisco AnyConnect SSL VPN no split tunnel and no hairpinning internet access

Greetings,
I am looking to configure a Cisco ASA 5515X for Cisco AnyConnect Essentials SSL VPN where ALL SSL-VPN traffic is tunneled, no split tunneling or hairpinning on the outside interface. However users require internet access. I need to route traffic out the "trusted" or "inside" interface to another device that performs content-filtering and inspection which then egresses out to the internet from there. Typically this could be done using a route-map (which ASA's do not support) or with a VRF (again, not an option on the ASA). The default route points to the outside interface toward the internet.
Is there no other method to force all my SSL-VPN traffic out the inside interface toward LAN subnets as needed and have another default route point toward the filtering device?
OR
Am I forced to put the ASA behind the filtering device somehow?

Hi Jim,
You can use tunnel default route for vpn traffic:
ASA(config)# route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 <inside hop> tunneled
configure mode commands/options:
<1-255> Distance metric for this route, default is 1
track Install route depending on tracked item
tunneled Enable the default tunnel gateway option, metric is set to 255
This route is applicable for only vpn traffic.
HTH,
Shetty

AnyConnect SSL VPN Vista split-tunneling

I recently setup an ASA5510 with 8.0fw with the AnyConnect SSL VPN Client.
Connecting to the SSL VPN works perfectly from all the XP computers that I have tested from. No problems there. However when on Vista, split-tunneling does not seem to function properly. Everything connects and works fine, and I can get to the defined secured remote nets, however I can't access anything out my default gateway(un-secured traffic). It seems like it might be a problem with Vista security features. When I try to ping out to any outside host, I get:
PING: transmit failed, error code 1231.
I can actually ping my default gateway, but nothing gets routed past it without the above error. I've also confirmed this several Vista installations, with Administrator + UAC disabled. Anyone else?

I have done the same testing, and on both Vista 32bit and 64Bit the split tunneling does not seem to work. Also I found that this is a "known" bug
From the Release Notes::
AnyConnect Split-tunneling Does Not Work on Windows Vista - AnyConnect split-tunneling works correctly with Windows XP and Windows 2000 (CSCsi82315)
I am happy that 64Bit works but will hold off on roll out until split-tunneling is fixed.
Cassidy

No SSL VPN tunnel from AnyConnect to IOS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for