Non Cenvatable material - Value not matching in MIGO and MIRO

Dear SAP experts!
We have the following problem.
We are using TAXINN.
We create a Purchase Order for a raw material, which is non cenvatable for a particular vendor.
When we carry out Goods Receipt, we change the Material type from Raw Material to Non Cenvatable in the Material Type in the Excise Item Tab and post the BED and AED values, the values are getting inventorized correctly.
And MIRO posting is also happening correctly. Both, MIGO and MIRO values are tallying. i.e, The total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, if we change any of the BED or AED value at the time of posting GR in the excise Invoice tab, then we are facing problem.
Value during MIGO posting is correct. That is the total value is sum of Basic PriceBEDAED+CST.
But, During MIRO posting, the value of BED and AED is not getting picked.
The value during MIRO shows only Basic Price+CST and not BED amount and AED amount.
Can any one tell me, where it is going wrong.
Your response is highly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Muthuraman.K

you have to used non deductable condition type in Taxinn to post tax to inventory
that is
JMIP IN: BED inventory % say 8%
JAIP IN AED inventory % Say 4 %
JMX2     IN: A/P BED inventor  100 %
JAX2     IN: A/P AED inventor  100%
and the above condition should be assigned to proper Classify Condition Types
TAXINN     JMIP     BEDINVENTP BED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JAIP     AEDINVENTP AED Inventory Percentage
TAXINN     JMX2     BEDINVENTT BED Inventory Total
TAXINN     JAX2     AEDINVENTT AED Inventory Total
And also u will have to assign condition type JMX2 and JAX2 in Maintain Excise Defaults
this will solve your issue

Similar Messages

  • CST and VAT added to material at the time of migo and miro

    Hi,
    we are maintaining FV11 record in that case amount is displaying but condition value is showing "0"
    Thanks a lot in advance for your confirmation,
    Neelima
    Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Sep 7, 2011 10:03 AM

    Hi,
    VAT can be inventoried or can be used for Set-Off based on how material behave to the business. VAT can be inventoried, you should have a condition type with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure .VAT can be used for Set-Off , you should have another condition type and assigning to an accounting key ( For example: ZZV {new on}not to the NVV key certainly) in tax procedure in OBYZ t.code & in t.code: OB40 , ZZV should assign to G/L account for VAT Set-Off.
    For VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off, you should maintain records(FV11)with respective condition type for VAT - inventoried & VAT -Set-Off with individual tax code with tax rate.
    For VAT can be inventoried, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding VAT amount to Inventory Account.
    For Set-Off VAT, it will affect in MIRO transaction.
    Generally CST always inventoried by business, it will affect on accounting in MIGO transaction adding CST amount to Inventory Account and you have to have a condition type for CST with assigning of NVV key in tax procedure, tax code for CST and maintain record (FV11) with CST condition type with CST tax code with a tax rate.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Reports of leading & non -leading ledgers are not matching

    Reports of leading & non-leading ledgers are not matching in the trial balance
    report from t.code S_PL0_86000030 . Both should be matched but not matching. Leading ledger report
    has been taken by giving the data (Currency:10, Company code: IN06,
    Ledger: 0L, Fiscal Year: 2008, From period:1, To period: 16)
    And non-leading ledger report has been taken by giving the data
    (Currency:10, Company code: IN06, Ledger: AI, Fiscal Year: 2008, From
    period:1, To period:9)
    And account codes are not same in both the reports. If one account codes
    is there in one report it is missing in other report.
    Balance sheet for the period from April 2008 to March 2009 has to be finalised based on the non-leading
    ledger report.
    1.Non-leading ledger is acitivated .Fiscal year activated Jan to Dec-K4 .IN this case  how can I enter the periods for  to view  leading ledger and non-leading leader reports and compare the reports.
    help to solve the issue.
    Regards
    dharmendar

    Hi,
    Thanks for your inputs. I have 2 queries here...
    1. Whether the reports S_ALR_87013542 & CN41 are same displaying the same information?
    2. How can I check the Balance amount still remaining in the project? Is there any report?
    Thanks & regards,
    Bala

  • Value difference for GR/IR Clearing Account in case of MIGO and MIRO.

    Hello Experts,
    One of our client has asked me about clarification regarding GR/IR Clearing Account shows different values when MIGO and MIRO posting. Scenario is that,
    SEZ
    Calculation of import Duty
    Input goods
    Material Base Value
           2,171,385
    Landing Cost
                 21,714
    For computing Customs landing charges need to be added
    BED @
    10%
               219,310
    Loaded in material cost
    CVD, @
    12%
               289,489
    Credit taken
    Customs Education Cess
    3%
                 15,264
    Loaded in material cost
    ADDL Duty
    4%
               108,686
    Credit taken
    Customs Duty
               632,749
    CVD
    12%
               219,310
    All duty
    4%
               108,686
    Cenvat
               327,996
    CST
           43,427.70
    2214812.7
    Hence Material cost in GR/IR should be Rs. 22,14,813
    Diff (2219092-2214813= 4279)
    Whereas it is taking Rs. 22,19,092
    My concern is that GR/IR Clearing Account consider only Material cost and non deductible tax amount i.e. CST which is loaded on material cost but system consider some different values, please check the above calculation. When user post MIRO in that case system automatically konck off GR/IR Clearing Account and post difference amount i.e. RS. 4279 to Inventory Account which is wrong. I dont know how system behaves in such manner.
    Please giude me on this issue as soon as possible.
    Regards,
    Vishal Jadhav

    Discussion moved. Please use Internationalization and Unicode for CIN related queries.

  • TS1925 iPad IOS 7.0.2 and Mountain Lion 10.8.5 Calendar colors do not match between computer and device.  Problem did not exist until updated IOS arrived.  Colours change of their own free will despite being corrected on both iPAD and MacBook Pro.  Any an

    iPad IOS 7.0.2 and Mountain Lion 10.8.5 Calendar colors do not match between computer and device.  Problem did not exist until updated IOS arrived.  Colours change of their own free will despite being corrected on both iPAD and MacBook Pro.  Any answers?

    Please do not post the entire messages log as it takes up unnecessarily a lot of space.  It seems that there is a corrupt/nonfunctional file called
    [email protected]nt.plist
    Go to your hard drive, enter library, go into users, and go into launch agents and delete the thing above.  Empty the trash and restart.

  • Why req MIGO and MIRO in third party scenario

    Hello All,
    In third party scenario why we req to do MIGO in ref to PO.
    In 3rd party we create sales order with item cat TAS.
    We got the PR
    with ref to PR we create PO.
    then we do MIGO  and MIRO
    also If vendor is delivering the goods why we do the Delivery and PGI and then Invoice
    Why not Invoice with ref to sales order.
    regards,
    abhijit

    Hi
    In Third Party sales, the Item category is TAS ,if the Vendor directly supplies to the end customer.
    In Item category TAS, "Billing Relevance" is "F", i,e. Order related billing as per invoice quantity.
    If the Item category of the Third Party item is TAS, then Schedule line category is CS in standard. If you will go to CS, you will find , the "Delivery relevance" field is blank and there is no "Goods movement" also. That means no Delivery takes place against the Sales order, so no goods issue.
    This clearly indicates, we do not create any Delivery and no goods receipt takes place in third party sales process, when the vendor directly sends the goods to the customer.
    Once the goods are send to the end customer, Vendor creates an invoice and sends to the ordering company. Now, ordering company goes for Invoice verification ,what the vendor has sent to him. We only go for MIRO here and not MIGO.
    After that, the ordering company, creates the Customer invoice with reference to the Sales order(placed by its customer) and sends it to its customer.
    Complete process:
    Once the order is received from the custome(say ABC)r, the company (say XYZ) creates a Sales order ---> Purchase requisition is automatically triggered from the sales order -
    > from this Purch requisition a PO is created for the vendor -
    > aginst the PO, Vendor delivers the goods to the customer ABC and charge the ordering company,sends invoice for the same to the ordering company XYZ -
    > Ordering company XYZ does Vendor's invoice verification and creates a Customer invoice with reference to customer's(ABC) order and sends to the customer ABC.
    Some times Vendor sends the goods to the ordering company and then ordering company delivers the goods to its customer.
    Vendor does not deliver directly to the end customer in this case.
    In this case Item category is TAB and Schedule line category is CB.
    Here, Billing relevance is "A" - (Delivery related billing) in the Item category TAB, that means here Delivery takes place and Billing is created with reference to the Delivery created to the customer.
    In Schedule line category CB, you will find, 'Delivery relevance" field is activated and there is a movement type "601".
    So, Delivery and goods issue both takes place here.
    Here we go for both MIGO and MIRO.

  • Returns to vendor agter MIGO and MIRO

    hI,
    I have made on PO, did MIGO and MIRO for the same (CIN)
    Now i want to send back the material to vendor in two scenarios
    1) After MIGO
    2) After MIGO and MIRO
    3) After payment has been done.
    Regards,
    Satyendra

    Hi,
    For First case you can use 102 mov type against material document to return material.
    For Second & Third cases
    1) Create a return po and check the return item field in the po detail.
    2) create a return goodds receipt with migo. 161 will happen automatically.
    3) create a credit memo thru. miro.
    4) crease a excise invoice for other movements thru J1IS (if material is excisable.)
    5) post a excise invoice thru J1IV
    Revert back if any doubts.
    Ashok
    Reward is useful.

  • Business area in migo and miro

    hi,
    i activated business area financial statement in ob65.and i make gl field status and posting key field status business area is optional.and i assigned business area to plant in OMJ7.
    while doing migo and miro business area is not taking for gl a/c.
    is there any further settings required for this .please give me the solution to resolve this issue.

    Hi
    Encountering the same issue ...any suggestions pls
    Have activated BAFS in OB65 and assigned Plant Division combn to Business area in enterprise structure. But still business area is not getting defaulted in MM and excise utilization transactions
    Thanks and Regards

  • Purchase Order, MIGO and MIRO

    Dear All,
    Please guide me how to map the below scenario in SAP.
    We have to procure Material 'C' for that we have to get the Material 'A' from "X" Vendor. And it has to be delivered to "Y" Vendor. Then vendor "Y" uses Material 'B' and he does some processing and deliver Material 'C' to us. How to raise a purchase order, how to do MIGO and MIRO.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    1. Raise the PO(1) against the X vendor (materila A). in PO give the delivery address as Vendor Y..( it is in PO itemdetail tab)...
    2. create one more PO(2) (as subcontract) with item cater as L and issue to Vendor Y....
    Item C should have BOM as mateila A...
    3. Now you receive the materila A at vendor Y as against the PO(1).... (vendor X deliver the materila directly to vendor Y)...
    Now for when you do migo for the PO(1), it will hapen for movement type 101 and in backgorund it create the 541movement type to vendor Y ( issue componet to sub contract vendor )
    4. Settle the Invoice of Vendor X in MIRO seperatly.
    5. receive the Goods from the subcontract vendor (y) throug MIGO
    6. do MIRo for PO(2)
    Hope you understoud this...
    REgards
    anand

  • Account entries at tie of migo and miro

    Dear Gurus,
    please let me know about the account entries at time of MIGO and MIRO.
    thanking you in advance
    Best regards,
    Raghu
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on May 22, 2011 3:20 PM

    Dear,
    During MIGO Goods receipt,
    Inventory stores a/c - Debit entry of value 'x'
    GR/IR clearing a/c - Credit entry of value 'x'
    For MIRO,
    Vendor a/c - Credit entry of total invoice value
    GR/IR clearing a/c - Debit entry of value 'x' & Few other entries
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Update Ledger group in BKPF at the time of MIGO and MIRO

    Hi Friends,
    In our current implementation we have requirement to update a certain Ledger group, to restrict the postings in all ledgers, at the time of positng in MIGO and MIRO.
    Can you please let me know how we do this.
    Waiting for your reply,
    Madan Mohan

    Hi Santhosh,
    Thanks for your reply. But in the substitutions at header and line item level i didnt find the 'U300' userexit.
    Can you suggest me at what level i can find that user exit.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Madan

  • Path to tcode MIGO and MIRO???

    I can't find the path to tow tcodes MIGO and MIRO.Help me, please!!!
    Thank you for reading my post^^

    Hi,
    MIGO
    SAP Menu> Logistics-> MM-> Inventory Management> Goods Movement--> MIGO
    MIRO
    SAP menu-> Logistics> MM->Logistic Invoice verification-> document entry----MIRO
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • FI vs MM report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year.
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values.
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
    How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

    Hello,
    I thought, You can post manually to your stock account.
    First you can look the account change history for your stock account. Automatic posting check may be change by someone at past, and after manually posting, check it again.
    Z programs which is posting FI document with BAPI, system can not look automatic posting checkbox in FS00. May be Z programs posting to your stock without MM module.
    How can you catch this document?
    Answer is, please add BKPF-AWTYP field to your FBL3N report.
    Call SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable -> Customer Accounts -> Line Items -> Display Line Items -> Define Additional Fields for Line Item Display
    Please add new entry with using BKPF-AWTYP then save this customizing and please run RFPOSXEXTEND report with using SE38 transaction. While running this program, a pop-up appear on your screen, please click "YES" after that program will finish correctly. Then you can see "Reference Transact." field in FBL3N report.
    Then list your stock account with using this report and get subtotal for "Reference Transact.". If this field value is MKPF, these postings is coming from MM module. If there is a BKPF or BKPFF value, those are posting manually from FI module.
    I hope it helps to you,
    Regards,
    Burak

  • MM vs FI report - Stock Values not matching

    Dear Experts,
    MM Report : We are taking stock value report from MC.9 or MB5L for few sites for the previous financial year. 
    FI Report : The same sites and same previous year with material G/L account, the t-codes  FAGLB03 or S_PL0_86000030 are showing the different values. 
    The question here is,MM and FI reports are not matching. (FI reports shows Rs.47750 higher than the MM reports). As per the  client requirement, the MM & FI reports should match the values. Because all the material movement types are related to FI (For. ex GR & IR )
    Kindly tell me, what are the possibilities to go wrong?
                           How & where to analysis?
    Expecting a perfect report which gives the MM & FI values?
    Additional details: There is no possibility of manual posting in G/L account. It is automatic posting (Checked in the Tcode - FS00)
    I really appreciate if any one help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k
    Edited by: navahsek on Aug 27, 2009 12:17 PM

    Tthe stock values are matching in the company code level for previous financial year but when checking for few sties, the stock values are not matching.
    For Ex. year 2008 MM Stock values Rs. 10 Lakhs & FI values also same Rs.10 Lakhs for the company code level.
                 If you check the same for few sites( Site1, site2, site3, site4) & same year, the MM & FI values are different.
    I really appreciate if you help in this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    n a v a h s e k

  • Non Cenvatable Material

    What are the settings needs to be done in CIN for a certain material  if, material Non cenvatable but we pay excise duty on the same material ( But do not take any credit on the same).
    What are the account postings in same case when we post the excise invoice for such material?
    Best Regards,
    Ashu

    Hi,
    In such cases, the excise duty is inventorised.
    Regards,
    Prashant

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cost of replacing the Rear Display.

    hi, how much will be the cost of replacing the Rear Display? thanks.

  • Tree list icons

    hi apex users, Edited by: mang jose on Sep 1, 2010 5:20 PM

  • Can't import Adobe Illustrator CS4 .ai files

    I recently upgraded to Adobe Illustrator CS4. When I attempt to paste an .ai file into iWeb I see only a black rectangle. This was not the case with CS3 AI. It seems that I must now first convert the AI CS4 file into a .pdf or .eps before importing t

  • ODBC Firebird

    Hi I got this error when I try to connect to a firebird database: ORA-28500 [ODBC Firebird Driver]Unavalilable database ORA-02063 When I use the odbc with microsoft office access work fine. This is my initnomina.odbc: HS_FDS_CONNECT_INFO = nomina HS_

  • Safari slow iOS 8

    I'm running iOS 8 on my iPad 4 and Safari gets really slow when open a new tab and scroll through my bookmarks. The system itself is really fast, only Safari is slow. It's like scrolling on an Android device. I've already restored it to see if it wou