Old Purchase orders and template - Price Information not taken into account

Hi experts,
In MDM catalog, I have a product with 'Price Information' and with 'Contract price'. I create a shopping cart with the 'Price Information'.
Then, I create another shopping cart using the anterior througth the functionality 'Old Purchase orders and template'.
The price taken into account is the 'Contract Price'
Is this the standard procedure?
Thanks in advance,
R Silva

as far as i know the price preference is in this order
1. Contract price
2. Purchase Info record
3. list price
so in that case - this is standard procedure
you can confirm - by doing the same process for an item that has ONLY price information (list price) and see if that price is copied from old to new SC
thanks
-Adrivit

Similar Messages

Creat SC from Old Purchase Orders and Templates - Price not copied

Hi Experts,
When Creating SC usinfg Old Purchase Orders and Templates interface ,
All details are copied from Old SC to the New one , except the unit price of the item (It is created with price O )
Please advise where we can set to copy the price also.
Best Regards,
Moshe

15.02.2010 - 14:10:05 CET - Reply by SAP
Dear Moshe,
Thank you for contacting SAP Active Global Support.
I have logged on to the system and have checked the behaviour with the
SC: 1000007814. The item in this SC is an catalog item, that means it
has an catalog price too, which is 0 in this case.
If you are using the copy function, the system validate the item, and
set the original values (in this case the price) back to the standard.
This is the standard behaviour of the system.
Please use the catalog with price, as designed scenario.
Kind Regards,
Laszlo Tordai
Support Consultant
Active Global Support - Logistics

Interfering in "Old Purchase order and Templates"

Hi Experts,
We use Extended-Classic scenario.
We use ECC contracts and transfer the contracts details to the SRM-MDM catalog.
When the user creates SC the contract details come from the SRM-MDM
catalog as the source of supply correctly.
But when the user copy the SC, using "Old Purchase order and Templates", the source of supply (contract details) does not being copied from the old SC. (this happends because we use Extended scenario and we use backend contracts).
Is there any way we can interfere in "Old Purchase order and Templates" and force the contract details to be copied from the old SC?
Thanks in Advance,
Keren

Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
Yes, the old SC was created from catalog but we need the Source of supply (contract number) to be copied to the new SC.
Thanks,
Keren

Add restriction while create item by "Old Purchase Orders and Templates"

We are consider to add restriction while create shopping cart item by "Old Purchase Orders and Templates". After implement such restriction, create item by copying old shopping cart item is not allow for particular matereial group number.
Is there any BADI can be used in our case? If there is no, could modify HTML template the only solution?
Regards,
Donald

Hi,
If the restriction is for certain group of people,then you have 2 options:
1.Make the link invisible for those group of people by implementing the BADI BBP_SC_MODIFY_UI.In the BADI,first check the user attributes like particular role and based on that make the link invisible.
2. Assign certain role to the group of users who should not see the link "Old Purchase order and templates".You can hide this link in the MENU by removing this from the lits of trasctions in that particular role.In PFCG,go in that role and then under MENU tab,remove the entry for "OLD PURCHASE ORDER AND TEMPLATES".
BR,
Disha.
Do reward points for useful answers.

Old Purchase Orders and Templates

Hello,
I would like to deactivate and/or remove the u201COld Purchase Orders and Templatesu201D from the shopping transaction in SRM.
How can this be done?
We are currently running SRM 5.5
Best Regards

Hi
You can achieve it by this BADI BBP_SC_MODIFY_UI -Method SC_MODIFY_SCREEN
regards
muthu

Old Purchase Order and Templates

Hi Experts,
We have implemented SRM 5 and ECC 6 with classic scenario.
When we create a shopping cart, there is an option to select the old PO and templates which gives option to search for our own shopping carts and templates if any.
We have an business requirement to allow users to see all the shopping carts created within a business unit or department. This will enable them to use other shopping carts as reference.
Please let me know how this can be achevied.
Thanks
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
If you want that every user should be able to see all shopping carts created by all other users, you need
to configure "Monitor Shopping Cart" button on your EBP (SRM) Enterprise Portal.
Please consult your Portal consultant to understand how this functionality can be configured.
Also you might need to assign the role SAP_EC_BBP_ADMINISTRATOR
(Authorization Object - B_BUPA_FDG) to your users, so that they can access all shopping carts of
other users.
Please refer this link to know more:
http://www.purdue.edu/purchasing/doc/Monitor%20Shopping%20Carts.doc
Hope this will help.
Thanks,
Ruchika

MDM Old purchase Order and Template Problem

Hello,
We are on SRM 5 (SP12) and using MDM catalog.
We have a problem when we want to create an e-catalog shopping cart in copy of an old one which was correct.
The price of the new shopping cart get to 0 but in the old shopping cart it was 23,23....
Can somebody knows how can we solve this issue?
Thanks!

Hello,
We have also SRM 5 SP12 with SRM-MDM catalog 2.0 SP02 Patch 4 and have opened an OSS message to SAP on this issue.
They have been able to reproduce the problem on their test system and it has been transmitted to their development team.
It should be available in a next Patch
Kind regards
JC

Zero values not taken into account during retraction

Hello,
we are having an issue with data retraction.
When we reset a value to zero, the change in the value is not taken into account and the corresponding value in R/3 remains unchanged.
There are some posts that say that the function modules UPR_COST_PLAN_EXEC and UPR_COST_PLAN_INIT should be modified in order to populate <xth_data> with zero values, but debug mode shows that the data are read before calling these functions, and the zero values are
already ignored at this stage.
Could anyone help me, please?
Thank you in advance!

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Complaint wth ref. to invoice in CRM - Copy control not taken into account!

Hi all,
We are facing problems when replicating return orders (business object Complaint) with reference to invoices in ERP.
The copy control in ERP is not taken into account. Does anyone know if it is possible to check the copy control when replicating the complaint to ERP with reference to the invoice?
The return order is being replicated correctly and the link to the invoice is shown (so, the flow is correct).
But:
1.- The manual pricing conditions in the invoice in ERP are not being copied in the return order.
2.- Some data as the 'Incoterms' is being redetermined from the customer master data and is not being copied from the invoice.
3.- Data related to material is also being redetermined when the order is replicated
The copy control is not being taken into account and we can replicate return orders from CRM to ERP with reference to invoices for which the copy control is not maintained in ERP...
Please help...
Thanks in advance!
Yolanda

Try something like this, in place of ls_input_field_names-fieldname = 'ZZDEP2PVNDPGM'..
ls_input_field_names-objectname = 'ORDERADM_H'.
ls_input_field_names-ref_handle = '100'.
insert ls_input_field_names into table lt_input_field_names.
Edited by: Kevin Alcock on Aug 10, 2009 4:03 PM

CK11N Follow-up material not taken into account when costing

We are running the standard cost with quantity structure and we have detected that all the follow-up information is not taken into account to determine the bill of materials that will be used to calculate the standard cost.
SAP helpdesk has answered me the following:
"The situation in product cost planning is we do not check availability of any material stocks, and therefore we cannot provide the same functionality as MRP. You will have to create a new BOM that includes
the follow-up material or apply the modification to take into account the follow-up part."
Please, if anyone knows any user-exit we could use to develop something to fix it, we would appreciate it very much. It is a normal process and we can not say it does not work.
Regards, and waiting for any solution.
Yolanda.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

New values not taken into account in MASS / XD99

I am trying to use a background job to block Customers for Billing at month end.
In MASS/XD99 I created a variant to update field KNVV-FAKSD (Sales Area Billing Block).
But running the variant in background (using MASSBACK), it seems the new values I thought I saved in the variant in MASS/XD99 are not taken into account.
I opened the variant again in MASS/XD99 and indeed it seems it had not saved the new values, because the screen again shows the current values.
Tried a couple of times again, but everytime I open the variant I have saved again, the new values revert back to 'current values'.
Is this the reason MASSBACK is also making no updates? What am I doing wrong?
Thanks in advance for your comments & advice.

Here is the second method -
Regarding your issue:
Retraction is based on the records of the SEM buffer. Zero records are
in general filtered in the buffer, so that they cannot be considered forplanning functions that execute the retraction. I regret but this is
the normal system behaviour in the standard. As workaround, please use adummy key figure that is set to a value <> 0.
The only way is a work around. If you fill a dummy key figure with an
arbitrary value, the frame work recognizes this as not 0, even if the
proper key figure is 0. In that case the 0 retraction would work. So if
not existing, create an additional dummy key figure to the cube and workon as described.
For all the of retractions (CO-OM, IM, PS) BPS planning functions are
used and they run in the general BPS framework. This framework is
designed to explicitly not process zero records because of performance
reasons.
If zero records would be processed, planning functions would run longer
but they can't deal with those records anyway. Therefore the developmentdecided on the current design, to delete all zero records first, before
processing them with a planning function. This decision has been
discussed several times before and it not likely to be changed.
Regarding SAP note you can check the work aroud I explained can be foundin the oss note 768822 SEM-BPS: Retraction of WBS element w/ Pushback.
I hope this explains the reason.
Please kindly confirm the message if your issue is answered.
Thanks for your support and cooperation.

Index not taken into account

Dear experts,
I have the following problem. Even though table VEPO has the necessary index (by unvel), it is not taken into account in my select statement:
        SELECT SINGLE *
          INTO wa_vepo_line
          FROM *vepo
         WHERE unvel = wa_vepo_line-venum .
the index is standard and is called : A : Selection by subordinate shipping unit and it is certainly activated.
What might be wrong?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Roxani

hi
the system picks up the primary keys or index at the runtime...it is not possible to find out which one it will pick!
try to add vepos in ur where condition.
avoid select * . specify the required fields IF possible..
regards,
madhu

WebLogic 11g: Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account

Hello,
I'm trying to set up Production Redeployment on my EAR, under WebLogic 10.3.6.
However, I can't figure out how to make Weblogic-Application-Version work in MANIFEST.MF
Here is my EAR structure:
MyApplication
--- APP-INF
--- --- lib
--- --- classes
--- META-INF
--- --- application.xml
--- --- weblogic-application.xml
--- --- MANIFEST.MF <- file I update
--- WebApp1
--- --- META-INF
--- --- --- MANIFEST.MF
--- --- WEB-INF
--- --- --- classes
--- --- --- lib
--- --- --- web.xml
--- --- --- weblogic.xml
--- WebApp2
--- --- same as WebApp1
MANIFEST.MF content is the following:
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1
The problem is that it's not taken into account when I deploy the application in the WebLogic console.
When I use staged mode, the line Weblogic-Application-Version: VERSION_1 is removed from the staged MANIFEST.MF file.
The only way to manage to version my application is to add the flag -appversion to weblogic.Deployer, but I don't want to use that on a Production environment (and it's not recommended in the documentation!).
Any idea why Weblogic-Application-Version not taken into account? I tried to add debug mode to node weblogic/debug but with no success.
Thanks by advance,
Julien

I tested it at my end and was able to redeploy it successfully with the application versions.
Are you saying that by deploying through weblogic console,the archive version is not honoring/getting picked up .is that correct?
if yes, what does your weblogic console shows for archive version,when you first try to deploy your application with the VERSION_1.
I mean,when you are on the "Optional Settings" Page.Do you see the Archive Version as VERSION_1?
Deployments >> Click on the Install >> select your application ( MyAPP)>> Install this deployment as an application >> Select deployment targets >> Optional Settngs
Example from the Optional settings Page for My application
What do you want to name this deployment?
Name: MyAPP
Archive Version:
VERSION_1
This can confirm that the application being deployed is versioned one and if it doesn't shows up,then you need to check why its not getting picked up.?
Moreover,You can enable the "deploy" debug flag to see whats going wrong in your case during the deployment process
Server > Debug > Weblogic > Deploy
Do refer the below viewlet on the Production Redeployment
http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/wls/redeployment/wls-side-by-side-non-annotation_viewlet_swf.html

Sales orders ans reservations not taken into account on MPS / MRP

Hello,
I am implementing the MPS / MRP and I have the following problem:
I have modified the necessary material master fields to take into account some materials on the MPS / MRP execution. These fields are MRP type, Lot Size, Strategy group and Availability Check.
Then, executing the MPS / MRP I have realised that only the sales orders and reservations created after the material master modifications are taken into account when I execute the MPS / MRP.
I suppose this is because the sales orders and reservations created before the material master modifications did not create the requirements because the availability check was not set for the material and so on... but I need to take into account these "old" reservations and sales orders .
Is there any way to "update" these orders and reservations?? Or I need to delete them and create new ones??
There are several sales orders and reservations created before the material master modifications. I think there have to be an standard way to update them.
Thank you very much in advanced,
Jordi.

Dear,
Are you getting these reservation in MD04?
Check the Planning file entry for these material in MD21 if not then create it through MD20 and take MRP run with planning mode -3 Deleted and recreated. And Processing key NETCH.
Also check the The firmed receipt is within the rescheduling horizon. The rescheduling horizon is set in Customizing for the MRP group (Transaction OPPR, Table T438M). A default value can be predefined in the Customizing of plant data (Transaction OPPQ, Table T399D). define the longer duration for it.
The firmed receipt (the MRP element) participates in the rescheduling check. You can set which MRP elements participate in the rescheduling check in the Customizing of the plant data (Transaction OPPQ).
Else you can carry out modification A using the MD_CHANGE_MRP_DATA BAdI and the CONSIDER_RESB method without making a modification.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

[ACCEPT][PROMPT] Input not taken into account in the script

Hi,
I'm preparing sql scripts to create schemas, one of the script is the main one.
In that one I'm requesting the passwords for two users, and a path to create an oracle directory.
The password for the first user and the path are taken into account.
But the second password requested seems not to be retained.
Here is the script:
SET ECHO OFF;
spool epss_schema.log;
ACCEPT EPSS_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT PIC_DIRECTORY char PROMPT 'Enter The Directory where the PIC dump files will be stored:' ;
create user epss10 identified by &EPSS_PASSWD default tablespace users temporary tablespace temp;
grant dba to epss10;
connect epss10/&EPSS_PASSWD;
@EPSS_SCHEMA.sql
@EPSS_ACTIVITY_CODES_DATA.sql
@EPSS_BCP_TABLE_DATA.sql
@EPSS_CALL_SETUP_TYPE.sql
@EPSS_COUNTRY_CD_DATA.sql
@EPSS_ERC_KEYWORDS_DATA.sql
@EPSS_ERC_KEYWORDS_LS_DATA.sql
@EPSS_ERC_KEYWORDS_PE_DATA.sql
@EPSS_ERC_KEYWORDS_SH_DATA.sql
@EPSS_GEN_ACTIVITY_CODES_DATA.sql
@EPSS_INSTRUMENT_LIST_DATA.sql
@EPSS_KEYWORDS_DATA.sql
@EPSS_NACE_CD_DATA.sql
@EPSS_REVIEW_PANELS_DATA.sql
@EPSS_REVIEW_PANELS_GEN_DATA.sql
@EPSS_STATE_DATA.sql
create or replace directory PIC_IMP_DIR as '&PIC_DIRECTORY';
ACCEPT EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS_DUMP Schema password: ' hide;
create user epss_dump10 identified by &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD default tablespace users temporary tablespace temp;
grant connect,resource,JAVAUSERPRIV to epss_dump10;
grant CREATE DATABASE LINK to epss_dump10;
grant CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM to epss_dump10;
grant CREATE SYNONYM to epss_dump10;
grant CREATE TABLE to epss_dump10;
grant CREATE VIEW to epss_dump10;
grant UNLIMITED TABLESPACE to epss_dump10;
grant read,write on directory PIC_IMP_DIR to epss_dump10;
connect epss_dump10/&EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD
@EPSS_DUMP_SCHEMA.sql
spool off;
exit;
I don't understand why the two first work and not the last one.
I already tried by moving the third ACCEPT at the top of the script without any success.
I had thought, as I'm frst connecting as sysdba asking for passwords and then connect as another user meaning another session, the script would have lost the variables values. But no as now I'm rerquesting the second password after the second connection.
Advice are welcome.
Thanks and regards.

Hi,
I just made some extended tests.
Code :
SET ECHO OFF;
spool epss_dump_schema.log;
ACCEPT EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS_DUMP Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT EPSS_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT PIC_DIRECTORY char PROMPT 'Enter The Directory where the PIC dump files will be stored:' ;
prompt &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD;
prompt &EPSS_PASSWD;
prompt &PIC_DIRECTORY;
The variables have the right information.
Now create the users will work without any problem
If I first connect with the first user (EPSS_DUMP) and then connect directly with the other one, that will work.
Code :
SET ECHO OFF;
spool epss_dump_schema.log;
ACCEPT EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS_DUMP Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT EPSS_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS Schema password: ' ;
ACCEPT PIC_DIRECTORY char PROMPT 'Enter The Directory where the PIC dump files will be stored:' ;
prompt &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD;
prompt &EPSS_PASSWD;
prompt &PIC_DIRECTORY;
CREATE user epss_dump10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE user epss10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE OR REPLACE directory PIC_IMP_DIR AS '&PIC_DIRECTORY';
GRANT connect,resource TO epss_dump10;
GRANT dba TO epss10;
GRANT connect,resource,JAVAUSERPRIV TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE DATABASE LINK TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE TABLE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE VIEW TO epss_dump10;
GRANT UNLIMITED TABLESPACE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT READ,WRITE ON directory PIC_IMP_DIR TO epss_dump10;
connect epss_dump10/&EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD
PROMPT 'EPSS PASSWORD: &EPSS_PASSWD';
connect epss10/&EPSS_PASSWD;
Now If I run additional script after I'm connected with the first user and then I connect with the second user, the connection will faill telling wrong login/password.
Code :
SET ECHO OFF;
spool epss_dump_schema.log;
ACCEPT EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS_DUMP Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT EPSS_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS Schema password: ' ;
ACCEPT PIC_DIRECTORY char PROMPT 'Enter The Directory where the PIC dump files will be stored:' ;
prompt &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD;
prompt &EPSS_PASSWD;
prompt &PIC_DIRECTORY;
CREATE user epss_dump10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE user epss10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE OR REPLACE directory PIC_IMP_DIR AS '&PIC_DIRECTORY';
GRANT connect,resource TO epss_dump10;
GRANT dba TO epss10;
GRANT connect,resource,JAVAUSERPRIV TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE DATABASE LINK TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE TABLE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE VIEW TO epss_dump10;
GRANT UNLIMITED TABLESPACE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT READ,WRITE ON directory PIC_IMP_DIR TO epss_dump10;
connect epss_dump10/&EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD
@EPSS_DUMP_SCHEMA.sql
@COMPILE_INVALID_OBJECTS.sql
PROMPT 'EPSS PASSWORD: &EPSS_PASSWD';
connect epss10/&EPSS_PASSWD;
My script EPSS_DUMP_SCHEMA.sql is just a script to create tables with constraints, synonyms, views, packages and so on.
Nothing seems strange.
Well the only strange thing is that if you call a script inside the main script, it seems that all the variables have lost their values.
Code :
SET ECHO OFF;
spool epss_dump_schema.log;
ACCEPT EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS_DUMP Schema password: ' hide;
ACCEPT EPSS_PASSWD char PROMPT 'Enter EPSS Schema password: ' ;
ACCEPT PIC_DIRECTORY char PROMPT 'Enter The Directory where the PIC dump files will be stored:' ;
prompt &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD;
prompt &EPSS_PASSWD;
prompt &PIC_DIRECTORY;
CREATE user epss_dump10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE user epss10 IDENTIFIED BY &EPSS_PASSWD DEFAULT tablespace users TEMPORARY tablespace temp;
CREATE OR REPLACE directory PIC_IMP_DIR AS '&PIC_DIRECTORY';
GRANT connect,resource TO epss_dump10;
GRANT dba TO epss10;
GRANT connect,resource,JAVAUSERPRIV TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE DATABASE LINK TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE SYNONYM TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE TABLE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT CREATE VIEW TO epss_dump10;
GRANT UNLIMITED TABLESPACE TO epss_dump10;
GRANT READ,WRITE ON directory PIC_IMP_DIR TO epss_dump10;
connect epss_dump10/&EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD
@EPSS_DUMP_SCHEMA.sql
PROMPT 'EPSS PASSWORD: &EPSS_PASSWD';
PROMPT 'EPSS_DUMP PASSWORD: &EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD';
PROMPT 'PIC DIRECTORY: &PIC_DIRECTORY';
The three prompts return
&EPSS_PASSWD
&EPSS_DUMP_PASSWD
&PIC_DIRECTORY
Thanks for your help.

Old Purchase orders and template - Price Information not taken into account

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for