One work process can only process one user request at a time?

Hi,
   How to configure the how many work processes for 80 concurrent users login daily.One work process can only process one user request at a time? Does this mean a login user has a dedicated work process servicing him. Or many login users interleave a work process's service? ,clarify the same.
Thanku

There are different types of work processes and the number needed depends on the number of transactions that will take place in the system. We are running 80 concurrent users with 15 dialog work processes. Please see the link below for an explanation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/fc/eb2e8a358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/content.htm

Similar Messages

  • How to create a new user in OWB that can only view other user's mappings

    Hello Everyone,
    I am new to OWB and want to know if possible to create different users that can only view other user's mappings without making any changes. Do you know if possible each user can have his own password?
    Thank you for your help!
    Jennifer

    A good starting point would be this blog posting:
    https://blogs.oracle.com/warehousebuilder/entry/build_up_multi-role_development_environment_in_owb
    I seem to recall as well from the OWB Admin class that existing objects in the repository would need to have the security updated if the additional restricted roles are created after tables/mappings/etc. so that they reflect the new security model.
    Also, for individual logins to OWB, each developer would require a separate database login.

  • Iphone not work i can only see the APPLE NOT WORK, iphone not work i can only see the APPLE NOT WORK

    iphone not work i can only see the APPLE NOT WORK, iphone not work i can only see the APPLE NOT WORK

    First, try to reset by holding the sleep and home button for about 10sec, until the Apple logo comes back again.
    If this does not help, connect in recovery mode and restore, explained in this article: iOS: Unable to update or restore

  • I can only open 1 .Ai file at a time from explorer

    Okay.  Googling is getting me nowhere and posting this is a last resort.
    computer is running:
    Windows 7 x64 SP1
    Creative Suite 5.5
    Illustrator 5.1
    The problem is:
    From within Windows Explorer, I can only open 1 Illustrator file at a time.  To get a different file to open, I either have to drag and drop the second file into the tabs under the menubar, or I need to quit Illustrator and re-open it.  Also,  I can not open additional files from Explorer one-at-a-time if one is already open.
    Quirks:
    If I go to File -> Open I can select multiple files from within the Open File dialogue window and they open just fine.  but i can't do it from within windows explorer.  This used to work and now it doesn't and I have no idea why.  Can anyone help me out?
    Seriously? 137 views and no replies?  No one has run into this before?

    This is a long shot but try going to Preferences/Type and uncheck "Show Font Names in English".
    Quit illustrator and restart, does it work now?
    The reason I´m suggesting this is that unless I have this box unchecked, some internal function in illustrator crashes after I´ve opened one document and I have to quit & restart if I wan´t to open another one. A rather silly bug and I stumpled upon the solution by accident after cursing illustrator for a couple of months...

  • Make PDF formular only accessable for one user at the same time?

    Hello!
    I designed a formular which needs to be filled in by different departments of our company. Unfortunatly the DF can be opened by several people at the same time. Is there any way to "lock" the PDF, fot that only one user has access to the formular at the same time, like e.g in MS Word Docs?
    Please help, I coudn´t find a solution myself.
    Thanks!
    K.B.

    This needs to be done on an OS level not by the application.

  • Problem accessing hard drive for more than one user at the same time

    Hello all,
    I recently bought a 2nd generation AirPort Extreeme 802.11n to replace a cheapo wireless router. The main reason I wanted to get the AirPort was so I could attach a USB hard drive which holds iTunes music files Originaly I had a G4 MDD and this was a second internal hard drive. Since my wife and son also share my Mac, we stored the iTunes music folder there, so we could all access the files. That worked fine.
    Then I got a early 2009 iMac and gave my wife the G4. My son also has a G3 iBook, using the wireless internet conection. At first I had the drive in an external case attached via Firewire. Both my iMac and my wife's G4 are attached to the network using ethernet, not wireless. She was able to access the music files so long as my Mac was on, but the connection was flaky.
    So as mentioned, I picked up a used AirPort Extreme from OWC, mainly to attach the hard drive, since it's no longer in my Mac. It took some fiddling, and I was honestly surpsied that the APE was trickier to set up than expected, but now I have the external drive mounting, and we can all access the files from any of the Macs in the house. It works great except for one thing. If I'm logged into my iMac, and then another family member logs in on the same iMac, we don't all have access to the hard drive. It's still mounted, but the you have no permission to view the files on it.
    Then if I remount it, I can access the files, but now the other user can't.
    So in a nutshell, only one user can access the drive at the same time from the iMac, but we can all access it from different Macs.
    Anyone have an idea of why this is happening and how to remidy it?

    This is the boilerplate text often used in connection to saving to a network (please NOTE the part where it explains that normally, it does work, but that it is impossible to troubleshoot someone else's network remotely, and that's why it's not supported by Adobe):
    If you are opening files over a network or saving them to a network server, please cease and desist immediately in the event you are currently experiencing problems with one or more files. Working across a network is not supported.
    See: 
    http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406793.html
      Copy the CLOSED file from your server to your local hard disk, work on it, save it again to your local hard disk, close it, and copy the closed file back to the server.
         Of course, the fact that Adobe does not support working across a network does not necessarily mean it won't work.   It should.
        Adobe's position is that there are too many variables in a network environment for them to guarantee that everything will work correctly in every network, especially given the fact that if something does not work properly, it's probably the network's fault, and Adobe has no way of troubleshooting your network.
      If you can't work locally, you are on your own, and if something happens, you're on your own. If you must work from a server, make sure your network administrator is a competent professional.
    When problems arise, a lot of valuable work can be lost.

  • Work process in running status from Long time

    Hi all,
    In my production system Workprocess is in runnig staus almost from 44 hours.
    i tried to end session of user but it not ending.
    i tried  to kill work process from sm50  end work process and from os(unix) kill -9 pid every thing i tried but work process is in still running
    please give some ideas to clear this
    Thanks,
    Shashi
    Edited by: shashikiran.ss on Oct 11, 2010 1:23 PM

    Hi Juan,
    yes from sm50 i have done cancel without core. no jobs are running or sheduled with that user. but work process status is in running with  program  J_1IREGS no action is taking place. 
    Restarting box  not possible right now.
    Regards
    Shashi

  • I can not message anybody that does not have a iPhone. I can only message iphone users

    i can only message people that have a iPhone not others

    spoons27 wrote:
    Have you checked settings?
    Settings>Messages>Send as SMS
    That setting does not affect the ability to send SMS. It only affects the behavior of iMessage if a message is not able to be sent as an iMessage. If you have it set to "on", your phone will try to resend it as SMS, if not, it won't. Messages originally sent as SMS (to non-iOS users) can be sent even if this is switched to off.

  • Why one interrupt request causes multiple times of responses (isr)?

    Hi, Folks
    I have a GPCT0 timer which will generate interrupt. with a oscilloscope, every time I run the code I saw a pulse was generated at the G0 output, but the isr run 51 times when I open the NI SPY to monitor it. When I turned off the NI SPY, it happened 6 to 8 times. I enabled the visa event, then configured the timer and turned on the hardware interrupt. Here is the code in main:
    // enable the G0_TC interrupt
     theSTC->Interrupt_A_Enable.setG0_TC_Interrupt_Ena​ble(1);
     theSTC->Interrupt_A_Enable.setG0_Gate_Interrupt_E​nable(0);
     theSTC->Interrupt_A_Enable.flush();
     theSTC->Analog_Trigger_Etc.setGPFO_0_Output_Selec​t(0);
     theSTC->Analog_Trigger_Etc.setGPFO_0_Output_Enabl​e(1);
     theSTC->Analog_Trigger_Etc.flush();
    // enable the interrupt A
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.setRegister(0); // reset complete register
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.setInterrupt_Output_Pol​arity(theSTC->Interrupt_Control.kInterrupt_Output_​PolarityActive_Low);  
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.setInterrupt_A_Output_S​elect(0);  
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.setInterrupt_A_Enable(1​);
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.flush();
    // start to run the timer
     theSTC->G0_Command.writeG0_Arm(1);
    Here is code in the isr:
    ViStatus _VI_FUNCH IHandler(ViSession vi, ViEventType etype, ViEvent event, ViAddr uhandle)
     tAddressSpace  Bar0, Bar1;
     tESeries *board;
     tSTC *theSTC;
     tMITE *mite;
     Bar0 = bus->createAddressSpace(kPCI_BAR0);
     Bar1 = bus->createAddressSpace(kPCI_BAR1);
     mite = new tMITE(Bar0);
     board = new tESeries(Bar1);
     theSTC = new tSTC(Bar1);
     i = i++;
     theSTC->Interrupt_A_Ack.writeG0_TC_Interrupt_Ack(​1);
     theSTC->Interrupt_A_Enable.writeG0_TC_Interrupt_E​nable(0);
     theSTC->Interrupt_Control.writeInterrupt_A_Enable​(0);
    (function code here)
     mite->LocalCpuInterruptMask2.setSetCpuIntIE(1);
     delete mite;
     delete theSTC;
     delete board;
     bus->destroyAddressSpace(Bar0);
     bus->destroyAddressSpace(Bar1);
     return VI_SUCCESS;
    I suspect that there may be someting wrong with data passing between main and isr, don't know for sure.
    Any help and advice will be appreciated greatly.
    Best regards,
    George

    Hi George,
    I'm confused on what the interrupt handler is trying to do.   By disabling interrupts you should not get any more interrupts after the first interrupt is handle.  I think you are saying the problem is that the interrupt only occurs 51 times, but I don't know how it happens more than once!?.  Is there something missing?
    One thing not related to the device programming... the interrupt event callback should not be create and destroy (new/delete) the chip objects eveytime is called for these reasons:
    - The chipobjects maintain softcopies of the registers and they model the state of the hardware.  The new object does not represent the currently configured device.  There should be one instance of the chip the object is representing.  You should create one instance of the tSTC because there's one STC in the device.
    - Memory operations can be very expensive.  A lot of time is consumed creating and destrying these objects.  Add to that the constructor and destructors of each object, which are called for every new and delete.
    To solve both problems use the 'userHandle' parameter in viInstallHandler, from the description:
    Applications can specify a value in the userHandle parameter
    that is passed to the handler on its invocation. VISA identifies handlers
    uniquely using the handler reference and this value.
    This userHandle provides context for your interrupt callback.  If you only need the STC object to service the interrupt you can pass a pointer to the STC object as the user handle.  In your handler you would use the userHandle argument to get to the STC object:
    ViStatus _VI_FUNCH IHandler(ViSession vi, ViEventType etype, ViEvent event, ViAddr uhandle)
        tSTC *stc;
        stc = (tSTC *) uhandle;
        stc->...
    Diego

  • Can only send 1 Text/MMS at a time

    Prior to this update, I could send a "mass" text message ( WITHOUT PICTURES ) now I can only send out one at a time. This is a very annoying problem when you have to to send he same text message to 4-5 people. I can't now, I get "send failure". Of course as is standard AT&T procedure, they assume no responsibility and keep telling me there roll out went flawlessly and that i's obviously an iPhone issue.
    SO, has anyone else had this issue arise and if so, have you figured out a solution.
    THanks, I appreciate it, and I still hate AT&T....So please don't pounce on me for all you AT&T fanboys. My iPhone experience has ALL been network related and I can say I really hate AT&T

    Hi,No ATT fanboy here, but I am able to send text message to two people and a picture text to two people.
    iPhone 3G
    b

  • Can only connect to enterprise wifi the first time each day, then does not reconnect and got the "Associati​on Failed" error

    To save battery, I leave my wifi off when the TP's screen is locked.  At home, my TP has no problem reconnecting to wifi after the screen is unlocked.  However, at work, which uses enterprise wifi, I can only connect the first time.  If I lock the screen and then unlock it (causing the wifi to turn off and on again) then the TP will not reconnect and I would get the "Association failed" error over and over again.  If I were to turn the TP off and on again, I would still get the same error.  Here's the strange part, if I come in work the next day, it would be able to connect to the wifi.  If I were to leave the wifi on all the time, it would not disconnect even if I lock the screen.  Now if I were to turn off the wifi and then turn it on again, the TP would not reconnect.  So it seems like the TP can only connect the first time each day....very strange...and frustrating.
    Post relates to: HP TouchPad (WiFi)

    Scimmia is right.  But you AcousticBruce are still very wrong.  You claim there were no error messages.  Yet after much proding and denial you finally provide small portions of error messages which fully identify the problem and can be found in many other posts in these forums.  Yet still, you haven't actually provided full output - instead you paraphrased the output after a couple of "//" symbols.
    If you don't give us the actual output we can't help - except in this case the error is so common we could very easily help.  So could the wiki page on wpa_supplicant if you had read it, as your problem is explictly listed there in a "NOTE" box.  But more importantly if you are reluctant to give us actual output we will not want to help you.
    This issue would have been solved instantly if you would have provided the actual output instead of lying about it.
    The relevant wiki pages:
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/WP … passphrase
    https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/He … er_or_root
    And the related forums posts found after just a quick search of that error message that you finally provided:
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=167244
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=184824
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=178909
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=190097
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=191351
    https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=191964
    Last edited by Trilby (2015-05-18 11:08:44)

  • TS3988 Each time I log into iCloud, I check, Keep me logged in, but this does not work.  I have to reenter user name etc each time I try to go back to my iCloud account.

    Each time I log into iCloud, I check, Keep me logged in, but this does not work.  I have to reenter user name and password etc each time I try to go back to my iCloud account.

    Hi,
    In Keychain Access app in the Menu for the App is Keychain First Aid.
    If you open this is the tick box for Synchronising the Login password with the so called Login Keychain ticked ?
    9:49 pm      Monday; March 16, 2015
    ​  iMac 2.5Ghz i5 2011 (Mavericks 10.9)
     G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
     MacBookPro 2Gb (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
     Mac OS X (10.6.8),
     Couple of iPhones and an iPad

  • How to make single page can only be accessed by one user at the same time

    While a user is accessing a page and modifying the data in this page. Other users are blocked for this page. How can it be realized?
    Any ideas or help are appreciated.
    Edited by: wahaha on Oct 6, 2008 2:49 AM

    wahaha wrote:
    While a user is accessing a page and modifying the data in this page. Other users are blocked for this page. How can it be realized?Assuming your scenario as you havnt mention anything. So means there are n number of users and you want that if any one of them accessing this page then nobody else will have access to that page.
    -> Use flag in DB and whenever user accessing that page set the flag 1 after login and check condition while other user login.
    -> After logout back to 0.
    Well this is possible one of the solution, not the best one.Try to find some other also.
    Sachin Kokcha

  • Unable to kill work process and user sessions.

    Hi Gurus,
    Iam facing a different problem in my prd system.Dialog process of a particular user has been running continuosly for long time, when i killed it with cancel with core or with out core option in sm50 still it is starting automatically on different PID and going in to loop.Even though user is not logged in and no back ground jobs are running still the process is running on its own.Even i tried killing the PID from OS level using DPMON but was of no help.
      I tried to kill the user session and log him out from sm04 from it was not happening, locked the user also but was of no help.
    Has anybody faced this situation?Is there any option excluding restarting the system to solve this issue.
    Thanks&Regards
    Prashant

    Hi Prashant,
    In case of multiple instances you have to log off the user from system wide select this option from SM04 while deleting user session again look for the action in SM50 for the process and if possible get details by activating trace from ST05 and filter with user, wp.
    Thanks,
    Saleem

  • Why does surround sound have to be CMSS for it to work, I can only do ste

    I just looked at this tutorial on this site: (I can't get it to insert the link no matter what. I clicked "insert a hyperlink, but that isn't working either). It makes it sound like the only way to get sound from all of your speakers is to enable cmss and click that top option. The only way I can get sound from all of my speakers is to enable the bottom option. What is the deal, and am I getting the best/worst sound in the way I am doing it's

    I believe to insert a hyperlink on this website you have to enable scripting. Generating?mp3 or?CD Stereo music out of your 4 satelite speakers and center channel requires either enabling the X-Fi CMSS 3D Surround(generally used for Movies)?setting in your Audio Console or, alternately, if using your X-Fi card with an external Decoder, you could (if available on your decoder) enable Dolby PLII Music enhancement or X2 Stereo enhancement. I personally prefer the results from enabling CMSS 3D Surround and then adjusting my center channel for an even sound stage although I have used Dolby PLII Music enhancement, via my external decoder and optical connection to my X-Fi External console, in the past with very good results. As far as the CMSS-3D Xpand Mode (generally used for Stereo Music Audio played on 4./5./6./7. speaker systems) it appears to be a somewhat more subtle version of the CMSS-3D Surround mode available providing the end-user with a slightly different stereo upmix emphasis. I like either mode as both are very convincing, not outstanding, but certainly acceptable methods of upmixing stereo to various external surround sound speaker and amplifier systems. :smileysurprised:Keep in mind that if you wish to play DVD Movies with Dolby Digital 5. or DTS soundtracks and you want all the discreet channels available then turn off the CMSS-3D. Hope this hel
    ps.
    Message Edited by sirhunter200 on 07-8-200703: PM

Maybe you are looking for