Optional MTOM as by MTOM Serialization Policy

Hello All,
I can't seem to find how to implement a jax-ws web service that allows both optimized and non-optimized messages as stated in
MTOM Serialization Policy (http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-soap12-mtom-policy-20070918/). Is it implied that when jax-ws is used all operations (or none) have to be send optimized? Is the optional function being implemented in a future version?
Other tooling allows the optional function so that there is no need to implement services with exclusive mtom messages (unless you are okay with sending mtom messages for just plain content).
Kind regards,
Erwin

Do you mean for the privacy policy link? What URL did you use? Apple will reject applications if they can find an URL that will take the user to a site that can be used to purchase items. You need to make sure you provide an URL that doesn't have a way to navigate to other areas of your website that allow purchasing.
Neil

Similar Messages

  • Does BPEL support MTOM?

    Does BPEL from 11g / Jdev / SOA support MTOM?
    I need to know this before spending to much time as I need to call an external service that supports MTOM and the ideal situation would be to receive the attachment as MTOM from BPEL and pass it on to the external webservice as MTOM.
    Edited by: user9976753 on Aug 24, 2009 8:56 AM

    Hi,
    I think I have figured out how to enable mtom on the BPEL service through Jdeveloper. It looks like when I add the mtom-encoding binding property with a value of true to the bpelprocess1_client_ep node under the *.bpel design view, the WSDL that is generated at run time contains this:
    <wsp:Policy xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="wsmtom_policy" xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy">
    <wsoma:OptimizedMimeSerialization xmlns:wsoma="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy/optimizedmimeserialization" xmlns:orawsp="http://schemas.oracle.com/ws/2006/01/policy"/>
    </wsp:Policy>
    and this:
    <wsp:PolicyReference xmlns:wsp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy" URI="#wsmtom_policy" wsdl:required="false"/>
    My question is, since the WSDL contains wsdl:required="false", how do I test MTOM through EM console?
    The EM console only contains "WSDL Default", "None" and "Custom" options for testing MTOM and if I choose "WSDL Default" it does not use MTOM, I think because "wsdl:required" is set to false in the WSDL, meaning MTOM and non MTOM attachments are valid, and there appears to be no way to change wsdl:required="true" from JDeveloper since this entry in the WSDL is really generated at runtime. I have searched for another option in JDevloper to switch the value to wsdl:required="true" with no luck. I think I am fine with wsdl:required="false" as long as I can figure out a way to force use of MTOM in the testing utility inside the EM console. How do you guys test this?
    Edited by: user9976753 on Sep 8, 2009 7:15 AM

  • Using PI 7.1 to transfer file attachments using MTOM standard

    Hello All,
    We have a scenario using PI 7.1 and we are required that PI calls a synchronous backend service and the backend service returns an attachement using MTOM format.
    1) Can this be handled using PI ?
    2) Any file size restrictions doing so using PI.
    3) Any configuration setting which can be used to achieve the same.
    Thanks.
    Kiran

    hi,
    this should be possible with 7.1 as per:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/76/fc9c3d9a864aef8139d70759a499fc/frameset.htm
    please check out also this page for config options for MTOM
    part : Applying MTOM in the Web Services Runtime
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • @MTOM with @SchemaValidation causes IllegalStateException when streaming

    We are using Weblogic-10.3.3 and streaming documents from Documentum to web service clients via MTOM (using the @MTOM annotation).
    Our service was working fine when our EJB web service class only had the @MTOM annotation on it.
    However, adding @SchemaValidation annotation causes a "java.lang.IllegalStateException: closed" exception (AdminServer.log stack trace is below) when the web service response is being returned (to the client).
    In soapUI, the document's content type comes through, but the file size is 0.
    Somehow, @SchemaValidation logic is interfering with the MTOM streaming.
    Has anyone else encountered there and/or know the reason why this occurring? Is the schema validation reading the response stream first (to do its validation) and then, when the client tries to read the same response stream for the document content, there is no data in the stream (since it was read already by the schema validation)?
    Again, there is no problem when the @SchemaValidation annotation is not present.
    Thank you.
    java.lang.IllegalStateException: closed
         at com.documentum.fc.client.content.impl.BlockPuller.verifyOpen(BlockPuller.java:64)
         at com.documentum.fc.client.content.impl.BlockPuller.close(BlockPuller.java:69)
         at com.documentum.fc.client.content.impl.PullerInputStream.close(PullerInputStream.java:110)
         at com.documentum.fc.impl.util.io.InputStreamHandle.close(InputStreamHandle.java:45)
         at java.io.FilterInputStream.close(FilterInputStream.java:156)
         at javax.activation.DataHandler.writeTo(DataHandler.java:297)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.MtomCodec$ByteArrayBuffer.write(MtomCodec.java:206)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.MtomCodec.encode(MtomCodec.java:173)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.encoding.SOAPBindingCodec.encode(SOAPBindingCodec.java:258)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.encodePacket(HttpAdapter.java:368)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.access$100(HttpAdapter.java:102)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:534)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:255)
         at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.servlet.ServletAdapter.handle(ServletAdapter.java:141)
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.WLSServletAdapter.handle(WLSServletAdapter.java:210)
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter$AuthorizedInvoke.run(HttpServletAdapter.java:311)
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.HttpServletAdapter.post(HttpServletAdapter.java:223)
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.doPost(JAXWSServlet.java:124)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:727)
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxws.JAXWSServlet.service(JAXWSServlet.java:79)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:821)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:300)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:184)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.doIt(WebAppServletContext.java:3686)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3650)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2268)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2174)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1446)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)

    Hi,
    Have you found a resolution to this issue? If you havent, I know why you are getting those issues. Let me know if you are still resolving this.
    regards,
    Johnny

  • IdM Password Policy Options

    Anyone know of a way of configuring the Password Policy Options (found in the Identity System Policy) to lost password self-service?
    Specifically:
    Password Provided by "Generated"
    Reset Notification Option "email"
    A client (IdM 7.1) would like a person using the self-service lost password function (authenticating via questions) to have new random expired password emailed rather than changing it immediately
    The above settings only seem to apply to Administrative password resets.
    -Rob

    Any solution found for this? I have the same issue.

  • Invoke a business service base in a WSDL with customer WS-Security Policy

    Customer write a Web service (Refer to the attachment file “HTTPS_PartyServicePortType.WSDL”)which declare a WS-Security Policy and apply this it to WS binding ,How can I generate a business service base in this WSDL and invoke it successfully?
    When create a business service in OSB, we get a error with below messages
    [[OSB Kernel:398133]The service is based on WSDL with Web Services Security Policies that are not natively supported by Oracle Service Bus. Please select OWSM Policies - From OWSM Policy Store option and attach equivalent OWSM security policy. For the Business Service, either you can add the necessary client policies manually by clicking Add button or you can let Oracle Service Bus automatically pick and add compatible client policies by clicking Add Compatible button.
    After enhanced the OSB domain with OWSM extension, we found the OOTB OWSM defined cannot support the HttpsToken and OSB cannot support below WS-Policy defined in OWSM, refer to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/doc.1111/e15866/owsm.htm#OSBDV1681
    51.2.8.1 Unsupported Assertion
    •     binding-permission-authorization
    •     http-security
    •     OptimizedMimeSerialization (MTOM)
    •     RMAssertion (Reliable Messaging)
    •     sca-component-authorization
    •     sca-component-permission-authorization
    •     UsingAddressing
    •     wss-saml-token-bearer-over-ssl (Authentication)
    it means that we cannot generate a web service with customer WS-security Policy
    The WS-Security Policy is shown as below:
    <wsp:Policy wsu:Id="WSHttpBinding_IPartyServicePortType_policy">
    <wsp:ExactlyOne>
    <wsp:All>
    <sp:TransportBinding xmlns:sp="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2005/07/securitypolicy">
    <wsp:Policy>
    <sp:TransportToken>
    <wsp:Policy>
    <sp:HttpsToken RequireClientCertificate="false"/>
    </wsp:Policy>
    </sp:TransportToken>
    <sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <wsp:Policy><sp:Basic256/></wsp:Policy>
    </sp:AlgorithmSuite>
    <sp:Layout><wsp:Policy><sp:Strict/></wsp:Policy></sp:Layout>
    </wsp:Policy>
    </sp:TransportBinding>
    <wsaw:UsingAddressing/>
    </wsp:All>
    </wsp:ExactlyOne>
    </wsp:Policy>
    BestRegards!
    Simon

    Hi
    According to
    http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs90/webserv/annotations.html#1050414
    If you are going to publish the policy file in the Web Service archive, the policy XML file must be located in either the META-INF/policies or WEB-INF/policies directory of the EJB JAR file (for EJB implemented Web Services) or WAR file (for Java class implemented Web Services), respectively.
    Can you make sure the policy file is in there?
    Also there is a sample from the developer at http://dev2dev.bea.com/blog/jlee/archive/2005/09/how_to_use_anno.html
    Vimala-

  • Outlook 2013 - wrap text group policy applied, not working with or without digital signature

    Hello,
    I'm adding group policies to apply on our new installations of Windows 8.1 with Office 2013. One of the settings being applied is enforcing plain text emails and wrapping text at a certain number of characters. Policies are being added using the Outlook
    2013 admx.
    When I check the options inside Outlook 2013 the group policy did apply successfully (File, Options, Mail, scroll down to Message Format) The option to "Automatically wrap text at character:" is set to 132 and not adjustable as it should be.
    In the group policy I have it set to wrap at 132 characters, but when I go to a client machine and send a digitally signed email, it wraps at the default 76 characters. This makes for very annoying short blocky emails and multi-line hyperlinks.
    If I do not digitally sign the email then the text doesn't wrap at all! (until it meets the end of the window). So under no circumstances is it wrapping at 132 where it's supposed to.
    Thanks,
    -Nick 

    Hi,
    What is your account type in Outlook? Exchange or others?
    Please also let me know the email format that you are sending, Plain Text, HTML or Rich Text Format.
    You can try sending the same emails in Outlook Safe Mode:
    Press Win + R and type “outlook.exe /safe” in the blank box, then press Enter.
    If there’s no problem in Safe Mode, disable the suspicious add-ins to verify which add-ins caused this issue.
    Thanks,
    Melon Chen
    Forum Support
    Come back and mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here

  • Serialization in SAP R/3

    Dear all,
    In one of the interface flow, we are expecting a batch of  IDOCs from SAP R/3 in a serial order, which is not happening right now.
    I want to know, if there is a option/function module to enable serialization from SAP R/3.
    Kindly pour in your comments.
    Regards,
    Younus

    This could help you...
    /people/community.user/blog/2006/11/04/how-to-serialize-idoc-xml-messages-fed-into-xi
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/bd/277264c3ddd44ea429af5e7d2c6e69/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/0b/2a66d6507d11d18ee90000e8366fc2/content.htm
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/28/setting-up-inbound-qrfc-queues-for-serializing-idocs-using-the-idoc-adapter

  • Disable attachment option in Mail

    For security reasons, I would like to disable the attachment option in the Mail app in iPhone to prevent any data leakages.
    Is there such in-built capability or option where I can enforce such policy?

    Thank you, Ralph.
    Yes, I tried all of that. The best I could find is Mail > Edit > Attachments > and check "Always Insert Attachments at End of Message." Its better than nothing!

  • How to add a java option in oas 10g 9.0.4?

    I need add a java option in my oas 10g...
    I have an application implemented with jdeveloper 10g (10.1.2) and its need to use other jdbc libraries acording:
    http://radio.weblogs.com/0118231/stories/2005/05/27/workaroundForDeployingAdf1012AppUsingIntermediaDomainsToOracleAs904.html
    Using EnterpriseManager, i add a java option for the OC4J instance where my ADF 10.1.2-based application will be deployed:
    [b]-Xbootclasspath/p: C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\ojdbc14.jar;C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\orai18n.jar
    but now, ths oc4j instance dont init
    ...my opmn.xml file contains:
    <process-type id="ADF_050615" module-id="OC4J">
    <module-data>
    <category id="start-parameters">
    <data id="java-options" value="-server -Xrs -Djava.security.policy=C:\oracle\infra\j2ee\ADF_050615\config\java2.policy -Djava.awt.headless=true
                             -Xbootclasspath/p: C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\ojdbc14.jar;C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\orai18n.jar"
                             />
    <data id="oc4j-options" value="-properties"/>
    </category>
    <category id="stop-parameters">
    <data id="java-options" value="-Djava.security.policy=C:\oracle\infra\j2ee\ADF_050615\config\java2.policy -Djava.awt.headless=true"/>
    </category>
    </module-data>
    </process-type>
    Help me please

    Rigoberto, there should be no space between "-Xbootclasspath/p:" and the path "C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\ojdbc14.jar;C:\oracle\infra\jdbc-10.1.0.4\orai18n.jar"
    By the way, one can always take a look at the logs at
      $ORACLE_HOME/opmn/logs
    especially those files whose names start with OC4J~ if there is some wrong with oc4j processes. Those files are the default oc4j stout and sterr. If oc4j can not init, there should be some kind of error message in them.
    By the way, the following line may be deleted since no property file is specified.
      <data id="oc4j-options" value="-properties"/>
    Hope this helps.

  • How to define OC4J-Option in AS 10.1.3?

    Hi
    In Oracle Application Server Release 2 (10.1.2) it was possible to set the java- and OC4J-Options on page OC4J/Administration/Server-Attribute. (For example i want to add "-userThreads" to OC4J-Options and "-Xmx500m" to Java-options)
    However, I can't find a way to add this options in Application Server Release 3 (10.1.3)?
    Can anyone point me to the right place to add this options?
    Thanks.

    I tried updating my opmn.xml file but I continue to get this error message...
    Unable to get database connection : Not in an application scope - start OC4J with the -userThreads switch if using user-created threads
    If I don't use the OC4J's datasource, my code runs fine. This error only occurs if I attempt to use the datasource.
    Here is the section in the opmn.xml for the OC4J I created. The only changes I made were to add the oc4j-options tag and add -Xmx300m to the java-options tag. What am I missing?
    <process-type id="B2B" module-id="OC4J" status="enabled">
    <module-data>
    <category id="start-parameters">
    <data id="java-options" value="-server -Xmx300m -Djava.security.policy=$ORACLE_HOME/j2ee/B2B/config/java2.policy -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dhttp.webdir.enable=false"/>
    <data id="oc4j-options" value="-userThreads" />
    </category>
    <category id="stop-parameters">
    <data id="java-options" value="-Djava.security.policy=$ORACLE_HOME/j2ee/B2B/config/java2.policy -Djava.awt.headless=true -Dhttp.webdir.enable=false"/>
    </category>
    </module-data>
    <start timeout="600" retry="2"/>
    <stop timeout="120"/>
    <restart timeout="720" retry="2"/>
    <port id="default-web-site" range="8889" protocol="http"/>
    <port id="rmi" range="12401-12500"/>
    <port id="jms" range="12601-12700"/>
    <process-set id="default_group" numprocs="1"/>
    </process-type>

  • How do I darken the darkest red, green etc, in Options- Content- Colors

    I am bothered by glare and adjust browser colors for high contrast on a dark background. Black is boring after a while so I trade off to dark Green or Blue or Red etc.
    In IE 9 through 'Internet Options' I can choose a background color and then darken it using the 'Define Custom Color' feature.
    http://img809.imageshack.us/img809/3805/ie9internetoptionscolor.png
    In Chrome 10 with the 'Any Colors' extension I can darken using a slider.
    http://img710.imageshack.us/img710/2046/chrome10anycolors.png
    Firefox 4.0 'Options'-->'Content'-->'Colors' continues the Mozilla policy of freezing the color chart to the default choices so I cannot darken the darkest available non-black choices. I have been unable to find an add-on that doesn't require changing the color intensity on individual web pages rather than systemically.
    http://img860.imageshack.us/img860/4522/firefox40optionscontent.png
    Can anyone tutor me how to manipulate the Firefox color chart ? Thanks in advance

    Hi Burke,
    Here's the result, using Peggy's suggestion:
    Process:
    Click on the thin strip of red to the left of the title ("THE THOMPSONS") to select the background.
    You'll see the small x in each corner, indicating the object is locked.
    Go Arrange > Unlock (or press option-command-L) to unlock the object.
    Click on the Fill Color well in the format bar, and choose a new colour from the palette.
    Go Arrange > Lock (or press command-L to re-lock the object.
    Save the result.
    Regards,
    Barry

  • Group policy for Silent Java updates

    Hi,
    all users in my network getting popup messages for Java updates which is king of annoying when they are working on something. none of them got admin rights so they can not update java. 
    i don't want to go to every computer when they  got the popup and enter my credentials to allow update.
    is there any easy method (may be GP) to allow java updates to install with out asking admin details and with out giving popup.
    if i have to use scripting can some one assist me with the script ( i am a beginner with scripting).
    thank you,
    krishna 
    Krishna Gummadapu

    Hi,
    you have a few options.
    a) give the users the admin rights, so they can update Java.
    b) suppress the auto-update behaviour, so that Java never updates itself
    c) deploy the updated Java software to your computers (optionally also suppress the auto-update behaviour), and maintain deploying Java updates to your computers, forever.
    d) remove Java if it is not needed. Windows doesn't need Java, maybe some of your applications do need it.
    For (c), there are many options available to you, including Group Policy Software Installation, Startup scripts, System Center Configuration Manager, and many non-MS products which can perform software distribution for you.
    It can be a very similar challenge, for Adobe products, like FlashPlayer, AdobeReader, etc.
    There are many examples on www.itninja.com (formerly known as appdeploy.com), and many scripts on gallery/codeplex and in various deployment-focused blogs.
    Don
    (Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
    This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

  • Retention Policy for Tasks

    I am helping a client with their Exchange Online archiving policies.  Everything was working well until we realized that Tasks were getting archived according the default archiving policy.  I do not see the option to create a Default Retention
    Policy for Tasks.  It is not listed in the Default Folders drop down menu.  Another article indicated that they had the same issue and had to set the Default Policy to never archive and then setup individual policies for folders they did want archive
    in order to protect the Tasks folder.  However, I only seem to able to create "Archiving Policies" as a personal option.  I do not get the option to create an Archiving policy default folders.  The only option I see for Default folders
    is "Delete and Allow Recovery" or "Permanently Delete".  Move to Archive is not listed.   Please Help.

    The Default tag applies to Tasks folder as well. If you want to prevent items in that folder from being moved to the Archive mailbox, create a new Personal tag with the move to archive option, and apply it to the folder. As the retention options for the
    Tasks folder are not exposed to the end user either via Outlook or OWA, you will have to use EWS based script.
    You can refer to this article for more info:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/05/20/using-exchange-web-services-to-apply-a-personal-tag-to-a-custom-folder.aspx

  • Group Policy Preferences

    I'm interested in applying group policy preferences to our new Windows 7 machines, partly to simplify my image-building process, via Zen 10 (soon Zen 11). However, I understand that these are not available through the Local Group Policy editor- so my question is, does anybody know how we could produce a set of Group Policy preference settings to deploy via Zen, without the presence of Active Directory?

    Make sure this option is not set on the policy in the ZCC.
    "After enforcement, force a re-login on the managed device, if necessary"
    On 5/24/2011 9:36 AM, jfansell wrote:
    >
    > Thanks- I was hoping to be able to utilise something that already
    > existed rather than using custom adm files- but we are now looking into
    > doing it that way now. Incidentally we do have a purely for testing AD
    > environment in which I created a test policy containing preferences, and
    > imported this into ZCM 10, still no joy even though the policy
    > preferences files appeared at the workstation (under
    > c:\Windows\System32\grouppolicy\...) they just weren't effective.
    > Presumably this is somehow a limitation of our environment (the AD is
    > completely disconnected from the users and workstations). It would be
    > nice if somehow the preferences were replicated in ZCM in the future.
    >
    >
    Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
    Novell Knowledge Partner
    Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
    Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
    These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

Maybe you are looking for