Oracle 8.1.7 Client and Windows XP

Has anyone experienced any issues with installing the Oracle 8.1.7 Client on a new Windows XP PC? Does anyone know if Oracle 8.1.7 (client) is compatible with Windows XP?
Thanks in advance for any comments.
Lisa Mears
[email protected]

I don't know about XP but I'm having problems with the installer on Windows 2000 (sp2).
Any ideas?
Has anyone experienced any issues with installing the Oracle 8.1.7 Client on a new Windows XP PC? Does anyone know if Oracle 8.1.7 (client) is compatible with Windows XP?
Thanks in advance for any comments.
Lisa Mears
[email protected]

Similar Messages

Connecting to 64bit Oracle 11g from 32bit Client on Windows 7 64bit OS.

Hi All,
We have installed Oracle 11g 64 bit on a Windows 7 64 bit system. As we need to run some 32 bit application on the system, We installed 32 bit client and try to configured Local Net Service Name Configuration using Oracle Net Configuration Assistant and during test, it is unable to connect and giving the following error.
ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor
Best Regards
Fred

user13144834 wrote:
Hi All,
We have installed Oracle 11g 64 bit on a Windows 7 64 bit system. As we need to run some 32 bit application on the system, We installed 32 bit client and try to configured Local Net Service Name Configuration using Oracle Net Configuration Assistant and during test, it is unable to connect and giving the following error.
ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor
Best Regards
Fred=================================
A couple of important points.
First, the listener is a server side only process. It's entire purpose in life is to receive requests for connections to databases and set up those connections. Once the connection is established, the listener is out of the picture. It creates the connection. It doesn't sustain the connection. One listener, with the default name of LISTENER, running from one oracle home, listening on a single port, will serve multiple database instances of multiple versions running from multiple homes. It is an unnecessary complexity to try to have multiple listeners or to name the listener as if it belongs to a particular database. That would be like the telephone company building a separate switchboard for each customer.
Additional notes on the listener: One listener is capable of listening on multiple ports. But please notice that it is the listener using these ports, not the database instance. You can't bind a specific listener port to a specific db instance. Similarly, one listener is capable of listnening on multiple IP addresses (in the case of a server with multiple NICs) But just like the port, you can't bind a specific ip address to a specific db instance.
Second, the tnsnames.ora file is a client side issue. It's purpose is for address resolution - the tns equivalent of the 'hosts' file further down the network stack. The only reason it exists on a host machine is because that machine can also run client processes.
Assume you have the following in your tnsnames.ora:
larry =
(DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST =
      (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myhost)(PORT = 1521))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
      (SERVICE_NAME = curley)
)Now, when you issue a connect, say like this:
$> sqlplus scott/tiger@larrytns will look in your tnsnames.ora for an entry called 'larry'. Next, tns sends a request to (PORT = 1521) on (HOST = myhost) using (PROTOCOL = TCP), asking for a connection to (SERVICE_NAME = curley).
Where is (HOST = myhost) on the network? When the request gets passed from tns to the next layer in the network stack, the name 'myhost' will get resolved to an IP address, either via a local 'hosts' file, via DNS, or possibly other less used mechanisms. You can also hard-code the ip address (HOST = 123.456.789.101) in the tnsnames.ora.
Next, the request arrives at port 1521 on myhost. Hopefully, there is a listener on myhost configured to listen on port 1521, and that listener knows about SERVICE_NAME = curley. If so, you'll be connected.
What can go wrong?
First, there may not be an entry for 'larry' in your tnsnames. In that case you get "ORA-12154: TNS:could not resolve the connect identifier specified" No need to go looking for a problem on the host, with the listener, etc. If you can't place a telephone call because you don't know the number (can't find your telephone directory (tnsnames.ora) or can't find the party you are looking for listed in it (no entry for larry)) you don't look for problems at the telephone switchboard.
Maybe the entry for larry was found, but myhost couldn't be resolved to an IP address (say there was no entry for myhost in the local hosts file). This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe there was an entry for myserver in the local hosts file, but it specified a bad IP address. This will result in "ORA-12545: Connect failed because target host or object does not exist"
Maybe the IP was good, but there is no listener running: "ORA-12541: TNS:no listener"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, but it is listening on a different port. "ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error"
Maybe the IP was good, there is a listener at myhost, it is listening on the specified port, but doesn't know about SERVICE_NAME = curley. "ORA-12514: TNS:listener does not currently know of service requested in connect descriptor"
Third: If the client is on the same machine as the db instance, it is possible to connect without referencing tnsnames and without going through the listener.
Now, when you issue a connect, say like this:
$> sqlplus scott/tigertns will attempt to establish an IPC connection to the db instance. How does it know the name of the instance? It uses the current value of the enviornment variable ORACLE_SID. So...
$> export ORACLE_SID=fred
$> sqlplus scott/tigerIt will attempt to connect to the instance known as "fred". If there is no such instance, it will, of course, fail. Also, if there is no value set for ORACLE_SID, the connect will fail.
check executing instances to get the SID
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ ps -ef|rgrep pmon
oracle    4236     1 0 10:30 ?        00:00:00 ora_pmon_vlnxora1
oracle    4878 4854 0 10:42 pts/0    00:00:00 grep pmonset ORACLE_SID appropriately, and connect
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID='vlnxora1
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ sqlplus scott/tiger
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:42:37 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing optionsNow set ORACLE_SID to a bogus value, and try to connect
SQL> exit
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID=FUBAR
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ SQLPsqlplus scott/tigere
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:42:57 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-01034: ORACLE not available
ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist
Linux Error: 2: No such file or directory
Enter user-name: Now set ORACLE_SID to null, and try to connect
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ export ORACLE_SID=
[oracle@vmlnx01 ~]$ SQLsqlplus /scott/tiger
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 22 10:43:24 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
ERROR:
ORA-12162: TNS:net service name is incorrectly specified=====================================

Which edition of Oracle is certified for Vista and Windows 7?

Many thanks.

Windows 7, is projected.
As for Windows Vista (10g and 11g):
Oracle Database (EE, SE, PE and Client) are supported on these platforms:
- Business edition
- Enterprise Edition
- Ultimate Edition
-Andy

VPN Client and Windows Folder Synchronisation

We are currently having problems with Windows XP Laptops which have folders Synchronised to Servers.
When they are working remotely, they use the VPN client to connect to the network. Unfortunately, the VPN Client Adapter does not appear in the "Network Connection" drop down menu within the Synchronisation Setup screens. This means that the synchronisation takes place once the Physical Adapter (LAN or Wireless) comes active and an error message appears everytime.
Has anyone come across this and found a fix for it ? There must be a away of getting the VPN LAN Adapter into the Synchronisation Network Connection list.

The only supported IPSec client for Windows 7 is 5.0.6. I would recommend uninstalling the client version that you have, upgrade the DNE package from Citrix, and then install the latest IPSec client.
Release Note:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client5006/release/notes/vpnclient5006.html#wp62415
DNE Update:
http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_1680845.asp
Client Download:
http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/ImageList.x?relVer=5.0.06.0110&mdfid=281940730&sftType=VPN+Client+Software&optPlat=Windows&nodecount=2&edesignator=null&modelName=Cisco+VPN+Client+v5.x&treeMdfId=268438162&treeName=Security&modifmdfid=&imname=&hybrid=&imst=&lr=Y

SBO Client and Windows Vista in workgroup Licence error

Hi!
My customer runs B1 2004C. Network structure is workgroup. Client and server are in the same workgroup. XP users connect successfully, but new Vista user gets the licence error: "-2147024891 Access denied". DCOM and other customizations on the licence server are done like in SAP Notes. It doesn't help.
I know Vista is not officially supported by 2004C B1, but i have several Vista users running SBO fine in domain structure. I think the trouble is in the workgroup.
Thanks a lot!
David.

Hi David,
some of the SAP Notes addressing DCOM access denied problem of 2004 releases.
<b>Note 833798 - After Upgrade W2003 to SP1: Access denied -2147024891</b>
Symptom
After upgrading Windows 2003 server to SP1 you get the access denied error -2147024891
Other terms
license server, error -2147024891
Reason and Prerequisites
Upgrade to Windows 2003 server changes security settings
Solution
The problem is caused by SP1 for W2003 Server. You have to change the
default configuration of the DCOM to enable clients to access license
server again:
1. go to "Start/run", type in "Dcomcnfg" and the Dcom configuration will open
2. expand "Component Services"
3. right click on "my computer", open "Properties"
4. go to tab "Com Security"
5. in "launch and activation permission" go to "edit limits" this
button is new since SP1
6. tick the boxes "remote launch" and "remote activation" for user
"everyone"
After that the clients can access the license server again, if all nescessary rights are give in the DCOM as well. When the changes described above did not take effect, please check this additionally:
1. go to "Start/run", type in "Dcomcnfg" and the Dcom configuration will open
2. expand "Component Services"
3. Go to "SBOLicense", open "Properties" by right-clicking the mouse
4. On register tab "Security" customize all permissions. Add all nescessary User accounts there. If you add i.e. User Group "Everyone" there, you will not have access right problems any longer, as every user belongs by default to this group.
If that change does not take effect immediately, reboot the server.
This note is permanently updated. If you have any comments or proposals tho improve it, please contact the SAP Business One Hotline and let us know.
<b>Note 824976 - error -2147024891, access denied to license server</b>
Symptom
error -2147024891 when trying to connect with B1 client to license server on another computer The License mechanism needs a properly set up license server which is available over the network via DCOM interface to client computers. The necessary windows user rights must be assigned to client and server.
Other terms
Access denied, SAP Business One, License server
Reason and Prerequisites
Functionality description
Solution
1. Is the license server up and running?
The B1 client on the license server computer should be started and logged into to ensure that there are no problems withs the license server itself. The B1 Server tools should be opened and the settings of the License Manager should be checked so that it is possible to connect by pressing the Connect button.
2. Is the network connection between client and license server working?
The server should be pinged via its IP-address for a response. Any firewalls should be disabled between client and license server for troubleshooting reasons as they can effectively block data packets which are needed for license mechanism. If a VPN is used between client and license server all ports should be available.
3. Are necessary windows user rights in the domain given?
We highly recommend to use B1 in a windows domain, as this is the only way to manage user accounts effectively. Domain user accounts have to be configured on the domain controller computer only. For troubleshooting reasons log in at the client with the windows domain administrator account, that should prevent the user from being blocked due to a lack windows user rights. According to our recommendations the users should be Power Users on the local computer.
4. Are necessary windows user rights in a workgroup given?
If the user is in a windows workgroup, the same user account should be configured with the same password on the license server and on each client computer as well. For troubleshooting reasons a local admin account should be configured on each of these computers. As account information is stored locally on each computer, username and password must be exactly the same on each of the machines. Login with this local administrator account. According to our recommendations the users should be Power Users on the local computer.
5. Is DCOM installed and configured correctly?
On the license server DCOM interface should to be installed and configured correctly. It is located under Control panel\administrative tools\ component service. Expand and in My Computer you will find DCOM Config\SBO License. Open its Properties and check configurations in Security tab. Add user accounts there, if needed.
DCOM should be enabled on the Client machines and on the server(s). In the Component Services expand to My Computer and right click to open the Properties for My Computer. Go to the Default Properties tab and make sure that 'Enable Distributed COM on this computer' is ticked. If these settings are modifed a restart of the computer is needed for the changes to take effect.
Br,
Chris

Oracle DB sessions on Linux and Windows

Actually I am confused the way session memory is allocated on 32 bit windows and linux OS.
Windows is a thread based architecture where all user sessions are treated as threads of oracle.exe process. The addressable space is 4GB and oracle.exe can use up to 3GB in case you use /3GB switch in boot.ini file. It means that combined size of SGA ,PGA and other memory structures can not be more than 3GB. When a session gets connected with a database a PGA is allocated. It means that memory required by database sessions also comes from the 3GB limit. If your memory usage goes beyond 3GB you wont be able to connect new sessions with database or you would require to reduce the size of one of your SGA components.
Linux is a process based architecture where each user session is treated as a separate process and has its own addressable space. Even on 32bit linux the addressable space is 4GB i.e. 2GB for process and 2GB for kernel. It means we need to accommodate our SGA and PGA in the 2GB limit (there are ways to increase the size of SGA but let assume we are doing nothing to raise the 2GB limit).
As PGA is allocated for every session when it connects with database.
My question is how PGA memory is allocated against a database session on linux.
To further clarify my question I am stating the results of an experiment that I did on linux and windows.
On windows I set the total size of SGA to 1730M and PGA aggregate target to 1024M. I was able to able to startup the database instance without any issue. Then I started connecting sessions with the database and even ran a query doing a heavy sort in one of the sessions but after connecting 10 sessions with DB I started getting ORA-12500 TNS Listener failed to start a dedicated server process error on windows.
Then I did the same experiment on Red Hat Linux. SGA size was 1633MB and where as PGA aggregate target was only 10MB. I was unable to start instance when I set the SGA size more than 1633MB.
With that setting I was able to connect more than 200 sessions with database inspite of running query doing heavy sort in 4 sessions without getting ORA-12500 error. I was even able to connect more than 400 sessions with database after setting PGA aggregate target to 1GB on Linux.
Now my confusion is why linux was able to handle more DB sessions. I know it’s a process base model and each session is a separate process and has its own addressable space but as PGA is allocated against every session and PGA memory comes from 2GB limit then why PGA memory did not exhaust on linux. Is PGA allocated differently on linux as compared to windows?

Perhaps the problem is easier to understand if you leave PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET out of this issue completely.
The out of memory problem you had, has nothing to do with PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET setting directly. The difference in number of processes comes from architectural differences in how Oracle uses memory in windows vs unix.
On windows the SGA + ALL PGAs must fit into one 4GB address space (in practice even smaller as youve noticed). This is because there's only one process, oracle.exe. One process = one address space.
On Unix, you have many processes and every process can use portion of their own address space for PGA.
So, on windows (32bit) you run out of address space for the single oracle.exe process. On unix you dont hit this limit just because the number of processes grows (but if some process wants to use a lot of PGA memory, then they eventually run out of address space (talking about 32bit again))
On unix you probably ran into another limit - amount of total usable virtual memory (RAM+swap) available in your system
Tanel Poder
http://blog.tanelpoder.com

Installation of Oracle 11g 32 bit Client on Windows 7 (32 bit) laptop.

Hi,
I just got a new Laptop with Windows 7 (32 bit) operating system.
Has any one successfully installed Oracle 11g client on in Windows 7 environment and if so what are the steps involved.
In the past I have never had any trouble installing an Oracle client on a Windows work station.
Thanks,
Ashim.

Oracle hasn't officially supported 11g on windows 7. folks have installed it successfully too. Check the below threads.
Re: 11g R1 database installation is successful on windows 7 64-bit
Oracle 11g on Windows 7
Re: DB 11gR2 for Windows ??
HTH
-Anantha

Oracle 8.1.7. client and 2000 Pro SP3

Has anyone experienced any problems using/installing 8.1.7 client on a workstation running 2000 pro with service pack 3 installed? It seems that everytime I try to install on a workstation with SP3 the installation refuses to start. Any ideas?

This is a known problem with Pentium 4 processors. Here's one workaround that should solve your problem.
1. Create a temporary directory on the client.
2. Copy the entire contents of the Oracle CD to the temporary directory created in step 1.
3. Search the directory structure created in Step 1 for the existence of the filename symcjit.dll.
4. Rename each copy of the symcjit.dll to symcjit.old.
5. Run the setup.exe from the \install\win32 directory and install Oracle 8.1.x and related products.

Cisco VPN Client and Windows XP Home

Hello,
I cannot find any information to tell me whether Windows XP Home (Not XP Professional) is supported under ant Cisco VPN client 4.xx or 5.xx.
We have several "home" users and when trying to install it just causes the pc to do a looping reboot.
Can anyone advise please ?
Scott

Scott,
Not sure if you read the release notes, but here they are are for V4.06 and V5.0:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/vpn_client/cisco_vpn_client/vpn_client46/release/notes/46clnt.html#wp1207576
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/prod_release_note09186a0080884df5.html#wp1207576
I'm not seeing anything that prohibits XP Home, but there are several caveats that may have direct bearing on why your user's can't get it installed (administrative access to internal firewalls).
HTH
Steve

VPN Client and Windows 7 - Window won't show

Bizarre issue I've now experienced on two separate PC's with VPN Client 5.00.07.0410 on 32-bit Windows 7:
Out of the blue, when the user double-clicks the Cisco VPN Client icon, the lock shows up in the system tray, and the application shows in the taskbar. You may get a glimpse of the window when you double-click the taskbar icon, or single click it and choose the application from the list. However, you are not able to actually get the window to be visible. This of course makes it impossible for the user to click the "connect" button.
I've discovered that when the icon is in the taskbar, and you hit "Enter" on the keyboard, it will connect. However I wouldn't expect a user to be able to figure this out, and so it was quite frustrating for them when this happened.
I've noticed there is a new version of the software for 64-bit users, but not for 32.
Anybody else experience this? Find a solution?
I tried uninstalling/re-installing and it made no difference.
-Chris

Try this so you don't have to do it each time... it worked for XP Pro 32-bit (Dell E6410). Haven't yet encountered on W7 Pro:
Bring up Task Manager (Ctrl+Alt_Delete). Open the Applications tab. Highlight VPN Client, right-click and select Maximize. (Sometimes if the system dies (power-loss) when connected to VPN the registry remembers the minimized setting and will not un-minimize it except with this process (and maybe one yet to be determined).)
I'm currently working (20140617) on a similar issue for W7 Pro for the User Authentication window where the RSA passcode needs to be entered. Alt-Tab works but I'm trying to make it permanent. (One problem is the user has a difficult time following instructions.)

VPN Client and Windows 7 Issue

Using VPN Client, V5.0.07.0440 a Dell Vostro W7 Professional system, 64 bit. The client installs and runs the same way it has on at least 20 other systems without issue. When I try to remote into the network, I get a "can not connect" error attempting to connect to any system or server. I placed a known good laptop using XP on the same internet line, it connects without issue. The remote access (mstsc.exe) verson is 6.1.7601.17514 there is no Admin switch in the shortcut. This is the first time anything like this has happened, numerous W7 32 and 64 bit and XP systems. Any help greatly appreciated.
Thanks
It's like the VPN connects to the network, but the remote access is not using the same connection. I get the same results whether the VPN Client is loaded or not.
Sure could use some help on this.

The system that I am trying to connect with is a Dell Vostro desktop, W7 64bit Pro. I am attempting to connect to a Windows 2003 domain thru a PIX 501 firewall. The desktop system uses an onboard Ethernet adaptor connected to the Internet thru Charter. I do not have ready access to the computer as it's my employers home system. The frustrating thing is, I have installed and set this up on at least 30 other systems and all of them worked flawlessly. Of course, this one would be the problem as it belongs to my boss.
Thanks for responding, I plan on picking up the unit so I can devote some real time to fixing it.
Thanks again

JAX-WS web service client and Windows integrated Security authentication

I am currently developing a JAX-WS web service client running on WebLogic 10.3.2.0. The client is connecting to exchange web service running on IIS.
Everything works well when EWS is configured with Http basic authentication.
The problems started when I changed the autentication method on EWS from Http basic authentication to Windows integrated Security authentication.
The client is then unable to authenticate to the web service. Every request made to EWS returns with the message : Invalid HTTP server response [401] - Unauthorized.
I tried using an authenticator like this one:
static class RetrieveWSDLAuthenticator extends Authenticator
private String username, password;
public RetrieveWSDLAuthenticator(String user, String pass)
username = user;
password = pass;
@Override
protected PasswordAuthentication getPasswordAuthentication()
return new PasswordAuthentication(username, password.toCharArray());
and setting it as the default authenticator :
Authenticator.setDefault(new MyAuthenticator("username", "password"));
but the method getPasswordAuthentication() was not even called.
Is there a way to make a JAX-WS client works with Windows integrated Security ?

WIS is not suppported on WLS JAX-WS. You'll need to use other authentication mechanisms such as http basic (which you tried already), or message-level security such as UNT, or SAML.
Regards,
Pyounguk

Windows 8.1 client and Windows Server 2003

Hi we have a Server 2003 domain with XP clients. I now have new PC's with Windows 8.1. I made the PC join the domain. I have given the new Windows 8.1 PC the same network settings like the XP-one it replaces. I can view all the network drives, I can join
the domain, printing, ... But when I try browsing the internet it doesn't work. I can do a ping to 8.8.8.8 and www.google.com and it answers but when I surf to the internet it won't open any internet page and time-outs. The 2003 domain is one without a dhcp-server
so all static ip's. I have attached this PC to our DHCP-network and set the IP-settings to automatic and it can browse the internet. I have given a XP-pc the same network settings and it can browse the internet. How can I solve this?
Kind regards!

Hi jhousen1,
Please provide more information for better analyzation:
1. What error message do you receive in Internet Explorer?
2. Do we have any proxy settings configured in group policy?
Please Check the proxy settings through Internet Options in Windows 8.1, also take a look at the article below:
What to do when Internet Explorer isn’t working
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-hk/internet-explorer/ie-crashes-stops-working#ie=ie-11
Best regards,
Fangzhou CHEN
Fangzhou CHEN
TechNet Community Support

Website Owner having new issues with Clients and Windows 8

I own a website that has a home-programmed chat. We've been in business about 12 years without any issues with compatibility. The chat is programmed in C and runs in a standard browser.
Lately I've had a few users (3 or 4) that have upgraded their machines and can no longer run the chat.
Most users that use Windows 8, or 7, or Vista, or whatever, have no problems. They can use the latest versions of IE, Firefox, Chrome, whatever they choose.
However, these users with problems can use none of the above.
I've gone through standard programs that block a chat, like firewalls and other spyware preventions. Shutting these off doesn't resolve the problem. Conflicting programs doesn't seem to be an issue, either. They aren't touch screen so I don't believe it
is a problem with the video card.
So that brings me back to the OS. The common thread seems to be that they are HP computers, and they have a new install of Windows 8. I think that there might be a missing DLL or other C Library that HP's installation of Windows 8 might be lacking.
Any suggestions on if I'm on the right track, and more importantly, how do I fix this problem?

Hi，
Seems this is a web-based chatting program, I suggest you add the site to a compatibility view list, (launch IE, Tools\Compatibility View list) then check this issue again. Check the error message and infromation recorded in the event viewer to find out
the cause.
Make sure the computers have all the latest updates, especially for video and audio drivers.
Clear the cache\temporary internet files in IE, or test this issue in a no add-ons mode.
From your description, it also sounds like a "defect\bug" for the chatting-program on Windows 8 on HP computers, if so, it should be related with development. you may find more help in the developer forum
Internet Explorer Extension Development Forum
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/ie/en-US/home?forum=ieextensiondevelopment
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

Oracle 10g support for EM64T and Windows 64-bit

Is there support for this configuration either in a patch release for 10g or is it planned for the near future?

Hi,
Oracle 10gR1 is certified for Tru64 UNIX 5.1b.
Certification of Oracle 10gR2 for Tru64 UNIX 5.1b.is planned for 1st quarter 2006.
If it does not support directly, is there a patch available etc..No idea, perhaps can you create an iTAR to post the question.
But if you read the metalink note 283751.1 Pre-Install checks for 10gR1 RDBMS (10.1.x) - Tru64 Platforms, you can see that no workaround provide...
Nicolas.
Message was edited by:
N. Gasparotto
Adding metalink note reference.

Oracle 8.1.7 Client and Windows XP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for