Oracle SQL Select query takes long time than expected.

Hi,
I am facing a problem in SQL select query statement. There is a long time taken in select query from the Database.
The query is as follows.
select /*+rule */ f1.id,f1.fdn,p1.attr_name,p1.attr_value from fdnmappingtable f1,parametertable p1 where p1.id = f1.id and ((f1.object_type ='ne_sub_type.780' )) and ( (f1.id in(select id from fdnmappingtable where fdn like '0=#1#/14=#S0058-3#/17=#S0058-3#/18=#1#/780=#5#%')))order by f1.id asc
This query is taking more than 4 seconds to get the results in a system where the DB is running for more than 1 month.
The same query is taking very few milliseconds (50-100ms) in a system where the DB is freshly installed and the data in the tables are same in both the systems.
Kindly advice what is going wrong??
Regards,
Purushotham

SQL> @/alcatel/omc1/data/query.sql
2 ;
9 rows selected.
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3745571015
| Id | Operation | Name |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PARAMETERTABLE |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 6 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
|* 8 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PRIMARY_KY_FDNMAPPINGTABLE |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - filter("F1"."OBJECT_TYPE"='ne_sub_type.780')
6 - access("P1"."ID"="F1"."ID")
7 - filter("FDN" LIKE '0=#1#/14=#S0058-3#/17=#S0058-3#/18=#1#/780=#5#
8 - access("F1"."ID"="ID")
Note
- rule based optimizer used (consider using cbo)
Statistics
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
0 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redo size
0 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
0 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
0 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
9 rows processed
SQL>

Similar Messages

  • Select query take long time

    Hi All.
    When i execute select query from View it takes about 00:00:45:12 sec to pull the data , but when i execute same query in some other system(different database with same table structure) it takes about 00:00:02:05 sec.
    1)I have tried by dropped and recreated the index then i tried by exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats procedure still no luck.
    Please help me to understand the reason difference in response time
    Thanks
    sankar

    did you run the EXPLAIN PLAN?

  • Select query takes long time....

    Hi Experts,
    I am using a select query in which inspection lot is in another table and order no. is in another table. this select query taking very long time, what is the problem in this query ? Pl. guide us.
    select bPRUEFLOS bMBLNR bCPUDT aAUFNR amatnr aLGORT a~bwart
    amenge aummat asgtxt axauto
    into corresponding fields of table itab
    *into table itab
    from mseg as a inner join qamb as b
    on amblnr = bmblnr
    and azeile = bzeile
    where b~PRUEFLOS in insp
    and  b~cpudt in date1
    and b~typ = '3'
    and a~bwart = '321'
    and a~aufnr in aufnr1.
    Yusuf

    hi
    instead of using 'move to corresponding of itab'  fields use  'into table itab'.....
    coz......if u use move to corresponding it will search for all the appropriate fields then it will place u r data........instead of that declare apprpiate internal table and use 'into table itab'.
    and one more thing dont use joins ......coz joins will decrease u r performance .....so instead of that use 'for all entries' ....and mention all the key fields in where condition ........
    ok
    reward points for helpful answers

  • Count (*)  for select stmt take more time than  execute a that sql stmt

    HI
    count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
    executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql  command for faster execute .
    but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
    almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
    please help me to get count of row faster.
    thanks in advance...

    797525 wrote:
    HI
    count (*) for select stmt take more time than execute a that sql stmt
    executing particular select stmt take 2.47 mins but select stmt is using the /*+parallel*/ (sql optimer) in that sql  command for faster execute .
    but if i tried to find out total number of rows in that query it takes more time ..
    almost 2.30 hrs still running to find count(col)
    please help me to get count of row faster.
    thanks in advance...That may be because your client is displaying only the first few records when you are running the "SELECT *". But when you run "COUNT(*)", the whole records has to be counted.
    As already mentined please read teh FAQ to post tuning questions.

  • Why update query takes  long time ?

    Hello everyone;
    My update query takes long time.  In  emp  ( self testing) just  having 2 records.
    when i issue update query , it takes long time;
    SQL> select  *  from  emp;
      EID  ENAME     EQUAL     ESALARY     ECITY    EPERK       ECONTACT_NO
          2   rose              mca                  22000   calacutta                   9999999999
          1   sona             msc                  17280    pune                          9999999999
    Elapsed: 00:00:00.05
    SQL> update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1';
    update emp set esalary=12000 where eid='1'
    * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:01:11.72
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    update emp set esalary=15000
      * ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    Elapsed: 00:02:22.27

    Hi  BCV;
    Thanks for your reply but it doesn't provide output,  please  see   this.
    SQL> update emp set esalary=15000;
    ........... Lock already occured.
    >> trying to trace  >>
    SQL> select HOLDING_SESSION from dba_blockers;
    HOLDING_SESSION
                144
    SQL> select sid , username, event from v$session where username='HR';
    SID USERNAME     EVENT
       144   HR    SQL*Net message from client
       151   HR    enq: TX - row lock contention
       159   HR    SQL*Net message from client
    >> It  does n 't  provide  clear output about  transaction lock >>
    SQL> SELECT username, v$lock.SID, TRUNC (id1 / POWER (2, 16)) rbs,
      2  BITAND (id1, TO_NUMBER ('ffff', 'xxxx')) + 0 slot, id2 seq, lmode,
      3  request
      4  FROM v$lock, v$session
      5  WHERE v$lock.TYPE = 'TX'
      6  AND v$lock.SID = v$session.SID
      7  AND v$session.username = USER;
      no rows selected
    SQL> select MACHINE from v$session where sid = :sid;
    SP2-0552: Bind variable "SID" not declared.

  • Select Query Takes more time

    Hi All,
    I have cloned KSB1 tcode to custom one as required by business.
    Below query takes more time than excepted.
    Here V_DB_TABLE = COVP.
    Values in Where clause are as follows
    OBNJR in ( KSBB010000001224  BT  KSBB012157221571)
    GJAHR in blank
    VERSN in '000'
    WRTTP in '04' and '11'
    all others are blank
    VT_VAR_COND = ( CPUDT BETWEEN '20091201' and '20091208' )
    SELECT (VT_FIELDS) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF GS_COVP_EXT      
                        FROM (V_DB_TABLE)                             
                        WHERE LEDNR = '00'                            
                        AND   OBJNR IN LR_OBJNR                       
                        AND   GJAHR IN GR_GJAHR                       
                        AND   VERSN IN GR_VERSN                       
                        AND   WRTTP IN GR_WRTTP                       
                        AND   KSTAR IN LR_KSTAR                       
                        AND   PERIO IN GR_PERIO                       
                        AND   BUDAT IN GR_BUDAT                       
                        AND   PAROB IN GR_PAROB                       
                        AND   (VT_VAR_COND).    
    Checked in table for this condition it has only 92 entries.
    But when i execute program takes long time as 3 Hrs.
    Could any one help me on this

    >1.Dont use SELECT/ENDSELECT instead use INTO TABLE addition .
    > 2.Avoid using corresponding addition.create a type and reference it.
    > If the select is going for dump beacause of storage limitations ,then use Cursors.
    you got three large NOs .... all three recommendations are wrong!
    The SE16 test is going in the right direction ... but what was filled. Nobody knows!!!!
    Select options:
    Did you ever try to trace the SE16?  The generic statement has for every field an in-condition!
    Without the information what was actually filled, nobody can say something there
    are at least 2**n  combinations possible!
    Use ST05 for SE16 and check actual statement plus explain!

  • Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected?

    Hi,
    I need experts support on the below mentioned issue:
    Why this Query is taking much longer time than expected? Sometimes I am getting connection timeout error. Is there any better way to achieve result in shortest time.  Below, please find the DDL & DML:
    DDL
    BHDCollections
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollections](
     [BHDCollectionid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [GroupMemberid] [int] NOT NULL,
     [BHDDate] [datetime] NOT NULL,
     [BHDShift] [varchar](10) NULL,
     [SlipValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
     [ProcessedValue] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
     [BHDRemarks] [varchar](500) NULL,
     [Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollections] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [BHDCollectionid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    BHDCollectionsDet
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BHDCollectionsDet](
     [CollectionDetailid] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [BHDCollectionid] [bigint] NOT NULL,
     [Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
     [Denomination] [decimal](18, 3) NOT NULL,
     [Quantity] [int] NOT NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_BHDCollectionsDet] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [CollectionDetailid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    Banks
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Banks](
     [Bankid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [Bankname] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
     [Bankabbr] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [BankContact] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [BankTel] [varchar](25) NULL,
     [BankFax] [varchar](25) NULL,
     [BankEmail] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [BankActive] [bit] NULL,
     [Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_Banks] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [Bankid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    Groupmembers
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers](
     [GroupMemberid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [Groupid] [int] NOT NULL,
     [BAID] [int] NOT NULL,
     [Createdby] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [Createdon] [datetime] NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_GroupMembers] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [GroupMemberid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts] FOREIGN KEY([BAID])
    REFERENCES [dbo].[BankAccounts] ([BAID])
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_BankAccounts]
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups] FOREIGN KEY([Groupid])
    REFERENCES [dbo].[Groups] ([Groupid])
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[GroupMembers] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_GroupMembers_Groups]
    BankAccounts
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts](
     [BAID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [CustomerID] [int] NOT NULL,
     [Locationid] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
     [Bankid] [int] NOT NULL,
     [BankAccountNo] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_BankAccounts] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [BAID] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks] FOREIGN KEY([Bankid])
    REFERENCES [dbo].[Banks] ([Bankid])
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Banks]
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts]  WITH CHECK ADD  CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1] FOREIGN KEY([Locationid])
    REFERENCES [dbo].[Locations] ([Locationid])
    GO
    ALTER TABLE [dbo].[BankAccounts] CHECK CONSTRAINT [FK_BankAccounts_Locations1]
    Currency
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Currency](
     [Currencyid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [CurrencyISOCode] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
     [CurrencyCountry] [varchar](50) NULL,
     [Currency] [varchar](50) NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_Currency] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [Currencyid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    CurrencyDetails
    SET ANSI_NULLS ON
    GO
    SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING ON
    GO
    CREATE TABLE [dbo].[CurrencyDetails](
     [CurDenid] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
     [Currencyid] [int] NOT NULL,
     [Denomination] [decimal](15, 3) NOT NULL,
     [DenominationType] [varchar](25) NOT NULL,
     CONSTRAINT [PK_CurrencyDetails] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [CurDenid] ASC
    )WITH (PAD_INDEX  = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE  = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS  = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS  = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
    ) ON [PRIMARY]
    GO
    SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
    QUERY
    WITH TEMP_TABLE AS
    SELECT     0 AS COINS, BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                          (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
    FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                          BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                          GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                          BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                          Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                          CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                          Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
    GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                          CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
    HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'Currency') AND
                          (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)
    UNION ALL
    SELECT     BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity AS COINS, 0 AS BN, BHDCollections.BHDDate AS CollectionDate, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid,
                          (BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid) AS DSLIPS, Banks.Bankname
    FROM         BHDCollections INNER JOIN
                          BHDCollectionsDet ON BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid = BHDCollectionsDet.BHDCollectionid INNER JOIN
                          GroupMembers ON BHDCollections.GroupMemberid = GroupMembers.GroupMemberid INNER JOIN
                          BankAccounts ON GroupMembers.BAID = BankAccounts.BAID INNER JOIN
                          Currency ON BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid = Currency.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                          CurrencyDetails ON Currency.Currencyid = CurrencyDetails.Currencyid INNER JOIN
                          Banks ON BankAccounts.Bankid = Banks.Bankid
    GROUP BY BHDCollectionsDet.Quantity, BHDCollections.BHDDate, BankAccounts.Bankid, BHDCollectionsDet.Currencyid, CurrencyDetails.DenominationType,
                          CurrencyDetails.Denomination, BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination, Banks.Bankname,BHDCollections.BHDCollectionid
    HAVING      (BHDCollections.BHDDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND (BankAccounts.Bankid = @Bankid) AND (CurrencyDetails.DenominationType = 'COIN') AND
                          (CurrencyDetails.Denomination = BHDCollectionsDet.Denomination)),
    TEMP_TABLE2 AS
    SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS  FROM TEMP_TABLE Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
    SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,count(DSLIPS) AS DSLIPS,sum(BN) AS BN,sum(COINS) AS coins FROM TEMP_TABLE2 Group By CollectionDate,Bankname
    HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;

    Without seeing an execution plan of the query it is hard to suggest something useful. Try insert the result of UNION ALL to the temporary table and then perform an aggregation on that table, not a CTE.
    Just
    SELECT CollectionDate,Bankname,DSLIPS AS DSLIPS,SUM(BN) AS BN,SUM(COINS)AS COINS  FROM
    #tmp Group By CollectionDate,DSLIPS,Bankname
    HAVING COUNT(DSLIPS)<>0;
    Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
    http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
    MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
    MS SQL Consulting:
    Large scale of database and data cleansing
    Remote DBA Services:
    Improves MS SQL Database Performance
    SQL Server Integration Services:
    Business Intelligence

  • SELECT statement takes long time

    Hi All,
    In the following code, if the T_QMIH-EQUNR contains blank or space values ,SELECT statement takes longer time to acess the data from OBJK table. If it T_QMIH-EQUNR contains values other than blank, performance is good and it fetches data very fast.
    Already we have indexes for EQUNR in OBJK table.
    Only for blank entries , it takes much time.Can anybody tell why it behaves for balnk entries?
    if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
            SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
            REFRESH T_OBJK.
            SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
              FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
              FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
              WHERE OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
             OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
    Thanks
    Ajay

    Hi
    You can use the field QMIH-QMNUM with OBJK-IHNUM
    in QMIH table, EQUNR is not primary key, it will have multiple entries
    so to improve the performance use one dummy internal table for QMIH  and sort it on EQUNR
    delete adjacent duplicates from d_qmih and use the same in for all entries
    this will improve the performance.
    Also use the fields in sequence of the index and primary keys also in select
    if not T_QMIH[] IS INITIAL.
    SORT T_QMIH BY EQUNR.
    REFRESH T_OBJK.
    SELECT EQUNR OBKNR
    FROM OBJK INTO TABLE T_OBJK
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_QMIH
    WHERE  IHNUM =  T_QMIH-QMNUM
    OBJK~TASER = 'SER01' AND
    OBJK~EQUNR = T_QMIH-EQUNR.
    try this and let me know
    regards
    Shiva

  • Oracle grid infrastructure installation take long time on step 15 (perform prerequisite checks )

    Oracle grid infrastructure installation take long time on step 15 (perform prerequisite checks ) 
    I'm starting install and configure Oracle RAC 11gR2 on redhat 6.3 , when i reached step 15 (perform prerequisite checks ) it's taking long time more than 10 hours and still checking .... i closed it and start installation again it's same still waiting in perform prerequisite checks 75% complete
    it is normal ?? what should i do ?? how i can monitoring installation steps and why this step take all this time please help .

    Pl identify which exact version of 11gR2 - currently only 11.2.0.3 is certified/supported on Linux 6.x - Oracle&amp;reg; Database - if you are using 11.2.0.1 or 11.2.0.2, then you will need to use Linux 5.x
    HTH
    Srini

  • My query take long time..

    The output of tkprof of my trace file is :
    SELECT ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY ,ENEXT.COD_BUSUN ,ENEXT.DAT_CALDE ,ENEXT.COD_SHFT
    FROM
    AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS5_VIW ENEXT ,PDS.PDS_EMPLOYEES EMPL ,
    PDS.PDS_EMPLOYMENT_TYPES EMPTYP ,PDS.PDS_PAY_CONDITIONS PAYCON WHERE
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY IN (SELECT
    ATT21 FROM APPS.GLOBAL_TEMPS WHERE ATT1 = 'PRSN') AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND EMPL.EMTYP_COD_EMTYP = EMPTYP.COD_EMTYP AND
    EMPTYP.LKP_COD_STA_PAY_EMTYP <> 3 AND
    NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1 AND EMPL.PCOND_COD_STA_PCOND
    = PAYCON.COD_STA_PCOND AND NVL(EMPL.LKP_MNTLY_WITHOUT_ENEXT_EMPLY,2) <> 1
    AND PAYCON.LKP_FLG_STA_PAY_PCOND = 1 AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE >=
    EMPL.DAT_EMPLT_EMPLY AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE <= NVL(EMPL.DAT_DSMSL_EMPLY,
    TO_DATE('15001229','YYYYMMDD')) AND 1 = (CASE WHEN
    ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND
    ENEXT.TYP_DAY BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2
    AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1 AND ENEXT.TYP_DAY NOT BETWEEN 4 AND 6 THEN
    1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 2 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 2
    THEN 0 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    1 THEN 1 WHEN ENEXT.LKP_STA_HOLIDAY_CALNR = 1 AND ENEXT.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB =
    2 THEN 0 END) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN = NVL(:B4 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_DPUT_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN = NVL(:B3 ,
    ENEXT.LKP_COD_MANAG_BUSUN) AND ENEXT.COD_BUSUN = NVL(:B2 , ENEXT.COD_BUSUN)
    AND ENEXT.COD_CAL = NVL(COD_CAL, ENEXT.COD_CAL) AND ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY =
    NVL(:B1 , ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY) AND ENEXT.COD_SHFT IN (SELECT
    SHFTBL.COD_SHTAB FROM AAC_SHIFT_TABLES SHFTBL WHERE
    SHFTBL.LKP_CAT_SHFT_SHTAB = 1) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE NOT IN (SELECT ABN.DAT
    FROM APPS.AAC_EMPL_EN_EX_ABNORMAL_VIW ABN WHERE ABN.PRSN =
    ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND ABN.DAT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 ) AND ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    IN (SELECT EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT FROM AAC.AAC_EMPLOYEE_ENTRY_EXITS
    EMPENEXT WHERE EMPENEXT.EMPLY_NUM_PRSN_EMPLY = EMPL.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY AND
    EMPENEXT.DAT_STR_SHFT_ENEXT BETWEEN :B6 AND :B5 AND
    EMPENEXT.LKP_FLG_STA_ENEXT <> 3) ORDER BY ENEXT.NUM_PRSN_EMPLY,
    ENEXT.DAT_CALDE
    call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
    Parse 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
    Fetch 2 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    total 6 40.45 40.30 306 17107740 0 24
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?

    user13344656 wrote:
    what is wrong in my query?
    why it take long time?See PL/SQL forum FAQ
    https://forums.oracle.com/forums/ann.jspa?annID=1535
    *3. How to improve the performance of my query? / My query is running slow.*
    SQL and PL/SQL FAQ
    For instructions on what information to post an how to format it.

  • Select query running long time

    Hi,
    DB version : 10g
    platform : sunos
    My select sql query running long time (more than 20hrs) .Still running .
    Is there any way to find sql query completion time approximately. (Pending time)
    Also is there any possibilities to increase the speed of sql query (already running) like adding hints.
    Please help me on this .
    Thanks

    Hi Sathish thanks for your reply,
    I have already checked in V$SESSION_LONGOPS .But it's showing TIME_REMAINING -->0
    select TOTALWORK,SOFAR,START_TIME,TIME_REMAINING from V$SESSION_LONGOPS where SID='10'
    TOTALWORK      SOFAR START_TIME      TIME_REMAINING
         1099759    1099759 27-JAN-11                    0Any idea ?
    Thanks.

  • Select statemnet takes long time

    Hello Experts,
    My select query takes a long time to give its output when I select and order type say PM15.
    It gives me the return message but takes a long time.
    Is there any other possibility to get output much faster.
    SELECT a~aufnr
           a~auart
           a~objnr
           a~werks
           b~stat INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab1
                  FROM aufk AS A JOIN jest AS B
                  ON a~objnr EQ b~objnr
                  WHERE a~aufnr IN  s_aufnr
                  AND  a~auart in s_auart
                  AND A~werks IN S_IWERK
                  AND b~inact EQ  ' '.                     "can set incat = space(Active) OR incat = 'X'(Not Active)
    SELECT a~aufnr
           a~auart
           a~objnr
           a~werks
           b~stat INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab
                  FROM aufk AS A JOIN jest AS B
                  ON a~objnr EQ b~objnr
                  WHERE a~aufnr IN  s_aufnr
                  AND  a~auart in s_auart
                  AND A~werks IN S_IWERK
                  AND b~stat  IN  ('I0002','I0340').
    READ TABLE ITAB INDEX 1.
    refresh: T_METH.
      clear: T_METH.
      clear :wa_meth.
    sort itab.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM ITAB COMPARING AUFNR.
    LOOP AT ITAB.
      wa_meth-refnumber     = 1.
      wa_meth-objecttype    = 'HEADER'.
      wa_meth-method        = 'ATPCHECK'.
      wa_meth-objectkey(12) = ITAB-AUFNR.
    *  wa_meth-objectkey(12) = ITAB-OBJNR.
      append  wa_meth to t_meth.
      clear  wa_meth.
       wa_meth-refnumber     = 1.
       wa_meth-method        = 'SAVE'.
       wa_meth-objectkey(12) = ITAB-AUFNR.
    *   wa_meth-objectkey(12) = ITAB-OBJNR.
      append  wa_meth to t_meth.
      call function 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
          tables
          it_methods   = T_METH
          return       = T_RET.
      call function 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.
    LOOP AT T_RET.
    write:/ T_RET-MESSAGE.
    EXIT.
    ENDLOOP.
    ENDLOOP.
    Thanks and Regrds,
    Nikhil.

    You can neglect the second query by pulling the values in first query itself
      SELECT a~aufnr
           a~auart
           a~objnr
           a~werks
           b~stat
           b~inact "New Addition
                  INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE itab1
                  FROM aufk AS A JOIN jest AS B
                  ON a~objnr EQ b~objnr
                  WHERE a~aufnr IN  s_aufnr
                  AND  a~auart  in s_auart
                  AND A~werks  IN S_IWERK.
                  "AND b~inact EQ  ' '.  removed.
      now the itab1 will consists of inact EQ  ' ' and b~stat  IN  ('I0002','I0340').
      try to process the internal table.
      Dont know how far it will help you

  • BEx query selection screen takes long time to popup

    Hi,
    I have a query which is taking long time to popup the selection screen. I have tried in RSRT the generate report option, the generating report takes 45 to 60 mins. After the report is generated the query selection screen comes up in couple of seconds. The first time I run the query everything its fine but then for the second time the problem comes back again.
    The selection screen takes +/- 40 mins to comes up in RSRT and in the portal it times out.
    I have run the statistics of the query and according to the statistics report the query takes a  lot of time for the following component :
    OLAP: Query Gen.     2681,312682
    I have removed the query from the cache monitor and after that regenerate the report. But these steps didnu2019t solve my problem.
    I made two test queries, in one query I have made the CKFu2019s and RKFu2019s directly at the infoprovider, and dragged and dropped in the KF structure. In the other query I made the CKFu2019s and RKFu2019s in the query KF structure itself. The query where I have the CKFu2019s and RKFu2019s at the infoprovider that query times out, the other query where I put the CKFu2019s and RKFu2019s in the query KF structure doesn't has this performance problem.
    What I donu2019t know is why the query is failing when I use RKFu2019s and CKFu2019s from the infoprovider, the other query donu2019t have this problem.
    Please advise how to proceed.
    Thanks in advance,
    Arash

    Hi,
    Please check the following notes which should be useful.
    1387593 - Performance optimization for query change/generation
    1416737 - Performance optimization for query change/generation(2)
    1396485 - Performance optimization for query check/save
    Then please execute the SE38 report ANALYZE_RSZ_TABLES (see notes
    1472915, 1506560) and repair/correct the different tables to optmize
    the query definition tables.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Query takes long time for first time

    I have a table with 100 million records and another tables with many rows.
    When I ran a query - it's takes about 1 minute to complete, but when I ran it again it takes less than 1 second to complete.
    Why it is happening?
    Thanks,
    Tz.

    Welcome to the forum.
    When you post a question always provide your 4 digit Oracle version. Different versions have different functionality and this can affect your results and the advice you need.
    For performance tuning questions see the FAQ (upper right corner of page) for the information needed for tuning requests.
    >
    When I ran a query
    >
    How did you run it? Did you use sql*plus, sqldeveloper, some other tool?
    What command did you enter?
    Using sql*plus you can get an execution plan for the query by
    SQL> set serveroutput on
    SQL> set autotrace traceonly
    SQL> select * from emp;
    Execution Plan
    Plan hash value: 3956160932
    | Id  | Operation         | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT  |      |    14 |   546 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   1 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL| EMP  |    14 |   546 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    SQL>

  • Query takes long time on multiprovider

    Hi,
    When i execute a query on the multiprovider, it takes very long time. it doesnt show up the results also. It just keep processing. I have executed the report only for one day but still it doesnt show any result. But when i execute on the cube, it executes quickly and shows the result.
    Actually i added one more cube to the multiprovider and ten transported that multiprovider to QA and PRD. Transportation went on successfully. After this i am unalbe to execute the reports on that multiprovider. What might be the cause? your help is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Annie

    Hi Annie.......
    Checklist for the performance of a Query........from a DOc........
    1. If exclusions exist, make sure they exist in the global filter area. Try to remove exclusions by subtracting out inclusions.
    2. Use Constant Selection to ignore filters in order to move more filters to the global filter area. (Use ABAPer to test and validate that this ensures better code)
    3. Within structures, make sure the filter order exists with the highest level filter first.
    4. Check code for all exit variables used in a report.
    5. Move Time restrictions to a global filter whenever possible.
    6. Within structures, use user exit variables to calculate things like QTD, YTD. This should generate better code than using overlapping restrictions to achieve the same thing. (Use ABAPer to test and validate that this ensures better code).
    7. When queries are written on multiproviders, restrict to InfoProvider in global filter whenever possible. MultiProvider (MultiCube) queries require additional database table joins to read data compared to those queries against standard InfoCubes (InfoProviders), and you should therefore hardcode the infoprovider in the global filter whenever possible to eliminate this problem.
    8. Move all global calculated and restricted key figures to local as to analyze any filters that can be removed and moved to the global definition in a query. Then you can change the calculated key figure and go back to utilizing the global calculated key figure if desired
    9. If Alternative UOM solution is used, turn off query cache.
    10. Set read mode of query based on static or dynamic. Reading data during navigation minimizes the impact on the R/3 database and application server resources because only data that the user requires will be retrieved. For queries involving large hierarchies with many nodes, it would be wise to select Read data during navigation and when expanding the hierarchy option to avoid reading data for the hierarchy nodes that are not expanded. Reserve the Read all data mode for special queriesu2014for instance, when a majority of the users need a given query to slice and dice against all dimensions, or when the data is needed for data mining. This mode places heavy demand on database and memory resources and might impact other SAP BW processes and tasks.
    11. Turn off formatting and results rows to minimize Frontend time whenever possible.
    12. Check for nested hierarchies. Always a bad idea.
    13. If u201CDisplay as hierarchyu201D is being used, look for other options to remove it to increase performance.
    14. Use Constant Selection instead of SUMCT and SUMGT within formulas.
    15. Do review of order of restrictions in formulas. Do as many restrictions as you can before calculations. Try to avoid calculations before restrictions.
    16. Check Sequential vs Parallel read on Multiproviders.
    17. Turn off warning messages on queries.
    18. Check to see if performance improves by removing text display (Use ABAPer to test and validate that this ensures better code).
    19. Check to see where currency conversions are happening if they are used.
    20. Check aggregation and exception aggregation on calculated key figures. Before aggregation is generally slower and should not be used unless explicitly needed.
    21. Avoid Cell Editor use if at all possible.
    22. Make sure queries are regenerated in production using RSRT after changes to statistics, consistency changes, or aggregates.
    23. Within the free characteristics, filter on the least granular objects first and make sure those come first in the order.
    24. Leverage characteristics or navigational attributes rather than hierarchies. Using a hierarchy requires reading temporary hierarchy tables and creates additional overhead compared to characteristics and navigational attributes. Therefore, characteristics or navigational attributes result in significantly better query performance than hierarchies, especially as the size of the hierarchy (e.g., the number of nodes and levels) and the complexity of the selection criteria increase.
    25. If hierarchies are used, minimize the number of nodes to include in the query results. Including all nodes in the query results (even the ones that are not needed or blank) slows down the query processing. The u201Cnot assignedu201D nodes in the hierarchy should be filtered out, and you should use a variable to reduce the number of hierarchy nodes selected.
    Also check this.........Recommendations for Modeling MultiProviders
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/43/5617d903f03e2be10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    Hope this helps......
    Regards,
    Debjani......

Maybe you are looking for