OTN FTP Soooo Slow

I'm trying to DL JDeveloper 3.1 for evaluation, but the FTP site is so slow... Does Oracle have any mirror sites? I appreciate being given access to these tools for evaluation as a developer, but think it reflects poorly on Oracle that the fastest DL I can consistently get on a high speed connection (cable modem) is about 8k/sec. Thanks in advance

And sometimes totally unreachable (from NL), I complained a lot of time, but never got any positive feedback.
Last time here :
Re: documentation website down (again) ?
Nicolas.
PS: an other one
Website docs down -> Oracle local docs search
Edited by: N. Gasparotto on Oct 21, 2009 5:23 PM
Edited by: N. Gasparotto on Oct 21, 2009 5:23 PM

Similar Messages

HT5364 Safari was soooo slow, that I deleted the App from my computer. I cannot re-install the software. Any ideas?

Safari was soooo slow, and I saw that there was a multitude of gmail bookmarks I could not deleted. Every time I tried to EDIT BOOKMARKS, Safari did not respond anymore, I had to Force Quit. I was so upset that I deleted the App from my computer. I cannot re-install the software. Any ideas?

Reinstall OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH10763?viewlocale=en_US

OTN FTP Site is out of reach !

Hi,
I'm unable to successfuly connect to OTN ftp site since monday
(I wanted to download the new JDeveloper3). I logged from
different machines with differents accounts. Whatever I'm doing
the site appears to be down. Does someone experience the same
problem ? If so, when will it be fixed ?
P.S. It's quite possible that this topic is addressed in a
newsgroup but I don't have access to any of them for the moment.
Thank you very much for any advice,
P. Jagstaidt
null

Patrick,
Do you mean OTN, or the Oracle Store? At any rate, I've notified
the OTN admin folks. With problems like these, you can click on
the 'Contact Us' link in the upper right corner of the OTN home
page.
Laura
Patrick Jagstaidt (guest) wrote:
: Hi,
: I'm unable to successfuly connect to OTN ftp site since monday
: (I wanted to download the new JDeveloper3). I logged from
: different machines with differents accounts. Whatever I'm doing
: the site appears to be down. Does someone experience the same
: problem ? If so, when will it be fixed ?
: P.S. It's quite possible that this topic is addressed in a
: newsgroup but I don't have access to any of them for the
moment.
: Thank you very much for any advice,
: P. Jagstaidt
null

Why is dreamweaver's FTP so slow!!!

Why is Dreamweaver so slow to open up the server-side view of a web site? Thought it was my slow web site or connection. After the script finally timed out claiming the server was taking too long, I tried Transmit.
Guess what? It just POPPED open.
Maybe Adobe could take a close look at Transmit. It's a terrific Mac FTP tool and only costs $25.
Then again, maybe not. They'll probably just buy it and bloat it with features so it won't work either.

that title reminds me of the commercials... this game should be way faster... MOM... this internet connection is SO SLOW! my internet is finally fast... finally... finallyfastdotcom. garbage.
There are many reasons why you could have trouble, and they aren't dreamweaver related. Does dreamweaver have permission to receive traffic through the firewall? Are your using the correct connection type (active/passive)?

FTP upload slow/timeout

When I try to upload, via Fetch, Dreamweaver, whatever, the upload times out. I am wired (ethernet) to a router and out via DSL. The PC on the same router is sometimes slow on the upload, but nothing like the mac.
any help?
thanks.

Update.
I tested the ftp upload with success through a different network.
The issue seems to be a known bug in the Thomson modem from my ISP.
The modem will be exchanged.

CRIO FTP too slow

Hi,
Part of setting up my application involves saving .txt files on to cRIO.
I use FTP Put file to do that and it works. The problem is that this file transfer is extremely slow with one host computer as compared to another.
Both these hosts are almost identical laptops of same make (IBM).
Based on suggestion by NI support I tried everything.
No firewall, No virus scan, same cables, same program.
Everything being same on two laptops, one is significantly slower in FTP. There has to be something that I am missing.
The files are not large at all. e.g 1 kb takes 10-15 seconds.
Please help if someone has had trouble with FTP speed.
Thanks.
Anmol.

Hi Anmol,
That's an interesting issue, I currently have some cRIO's sitting on my desk and would love to help you get to the bottom of this issue, could you let me know a few things:
1. Operating systems the same?
2. cRIO controller model & revision (revision is the first letter in the part number i.e. 111111C-00L would be rev C)
3. Network speeds of both laptop ethernet ports & the chipsets for these (via device manager)
4. Do you have another PC you could check this on to narrow it down to the laptop
5. Have you always had this issue?
Thanks,
Applications Engineer

Ftp too slow: pharlap and linux ftp problem

Hi all,
my problem seems very strange.
I work with a rt system (PXI 8187 with pharlap os). I have to retrieve several log files that can be very heavy (100 MB or more).
When I retrieve these files using Internet Explorer the ftp has a transfer rate of 500 KB/s ca. If I use SUSE Linux the transfer rate is 10 KB/s, that is not acceptable.
Moreover if I use a windows client onto SUSE Linux (using VMWare) the client present a transfer rate of 500 KB/s.
Finally the SUSE ftp client can retrieve from other FTP server (Linux) with a good transfer rate (1 MB/s).
So I can't understang where is the problem: windows can retrieve from pharlap, linux can retrieve from linux, windows onto linux can retrieve from pharlap, linux CAN'T (because too slow) retrieve from pharlap.
can someone help us?
thanks all.
Andrea

Hi Anmol,
That's an interesting issue, I currently have some cRIO's sitting on my desk and would love to help you get to the bottom of this issue, could you let me know a few things:
1. Operating systems the same?
2. cRIO controller model & revision (revision is the first letter in the part number i.e. 111111C-00L would be rev C)
3. Network speeds of both laptop ethernet ports & the chipsets for these (via device manager)
4. Do you have another PC you could check this on to narrow it down to the laptop
5. Have you always had this issue?
Thanks,
Applications Engineer

DW FTP is slow and causes CPU Spike

Does anyone know why DW causes the CPU to jump up when it is
performing FTP operations? I'm new to DW and maybe this is normal,
but it shouldn't be. When I perfrom FTP activities, DW usually
takes up about 60-70% of the CPU???
Also, why is the FTP client so slow?
Dreamweaver takes so much longer than other FTP clients. I
compared it's usage to SmartFTP, FileZilla, and Windows built in
FTP, and Dreamweaver is so slow on a magnitude of 20x - 30x. For a
quick test I tried to pull down a directory using dreamweaver. I
have all the files local already, so I told DW not to overwrite the
files...so you would think it should speed through all the files
and realize that they are all dups and not download anything, for a
directory with 15 files in it, i would think this FTP operation
should take about 2 seconds. but it takes dreamweaver about 4
minutes to complete this, all my other FTP clients can figure this
out in under 5 seconds, and they don't need to spike the CPU to do
it.
A quick search on the web tells me that I am not the only
person with these problems.
I really hope Adobe plans on fixing the FTP problems.
Technical details:
Dreamweaver CS3.
Windows Vista SP1, 4GB ram, Fujitsu T4220

I've had a related, ongoing problem with CS3 running up the
CPU and acting
slow for just about every operation for no apparent reason.
It goes in
surges, and just acts like molasses half the time, very
annoying. It is to
the point that I really don't use CS3, I use DW8, but try to
use CS3 here
and again to see if it has started working or if there is
some patch
released. This is on my XP workstation at work, and my Vista
workstation at
home. Both systems run CS3 slow enough that I just don't use
CS3. This has
been going on for over a year, since I got my copy of CS3.
Too bad really, because I am tasked with approving CS3 for
use by the rest
of our WEB team and I haven't been able to do that, so we
continue to use
DW8. We are missing out on Spry integration and are slowly
switching over
to Eclipse and Aptana instead. I think that if the CPU bug
isn't fixed, CS3
will be the version that has us switch away entirely. The
only hope seems to
be if they release the next version of DW before we can
completely switch
away. We are a smallish state agency and only have 8 DW
licenses, but
that's seven licenses they missed out on the upgrade path
with unless this
is fixed (mine is the only upgraded so far). It just isn't
useable in its
present state. :-\
"HenryHill" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:[email protected]...
> This has been a problem with Dreamweaver for a while
now. I would have
> thought
> that Adobe would have fixed the FTP issues, or at least
improved upon them
> by
> now.
>
> One of the things you can try is to disable the
"Maintain synchronization
> information" checkbox in the "Remote Info" section of a
site definition.
> although, you won't get the benefit of synchronization
in Dreamweaver, but
> you
> will get speed improvements, and your computer's CPU
won't spike and sound
> like
> a jumbo jet taking off every time you perform a FTP
operation.
>
> You can also try submitting a bug report as "John T
Smith" recommended,
> but I
> can pretty much guarantee you it won't do any good. We
have submitted
> many
> reports over the years and never heard anything.
>
> Your best bet is to go with an external FTP client such
as FileZilla
> (free!).
> You get the benefit of multiple connections so your
uploads/downloads are
> faster, plus it gives you a lot more feedback as the
FTPing is occuring,
> such
> as transfer speed, how many files have transfered, how
many are left, any
> errors. it will also auto detect if passive FTP is
needed, you can pause,
> stop, restart, it also shows you the exact ftp commands
that it is sending
> and
> what the responses are from the server. These are things
that Adobe
> should
> have included in the FTP client. As far as most of us
are concerned, the
> FTP
> client built into Dreamweaver is in the dark ages
compared to modern day
> FTP
> clients.
>
> Their are a lot of benefits to the built in client, but
for us, the
> negatives
> out weigh the positives.
>
>
>

DW8 FTP Very Slow

Hi-
This is more of an observation than a question...
Have other users noticed just how painfully slow the FTP in
DW8 is compared to dedicated FTP applications such as Core FTP,
Filezilla or WS-FTP? And, yes, my FTP in DW8 is configured
correctly for my server. I wish there was a way to add an external
FTP application to DW8 and bypass the DW8 FTP entirely (just like
setting up an external editor in Preferences). However, I haven't
seen this option in DW8.
-=SB

Hi Naveen,
When you are trying FTP the file are you using message mapping? If you scenario requires the who file transfer without any file content conversion and mapping changes. Then you can do a direct file transfer just by creating a scenario in integration directory without any development integration repository.
Also, you should consider the option of using a script to move the file from one location to another location if it just a file transfer.
Thanks,
Manohar.

Firefox on Android Jellybean 4.2.2 is soooo slow?

I am a long time user of Firefox on my PC. Could not do without it anymore :)
So ofcourse I did install it right away when I got my Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 WiFi with Android Jellybean 4.2.2.
And it is like a total other world: it is sooooo slow. It takes such a long time before the pages are even loading. It's like FF is first figuring out what it has to do with the URL:
"Eh? What do I have to do now? Wait, wait, don't tell me, I know it! Ehr ... what does he mean? What was it again? I know I have to do something now but what was it again? Oh, he wants me to go to that URL! I think? Yes, I am sure now that I have to go to that URL."
And then the page is loading. The actual loading of the page is just fine, no slowness there.
I did try all kind of things mentioned here at the forum (clearing cache, moving cache to another place, uninstall FF and install FF fresh again, and so on) but nothing helps. And no add ons installed at all.
I also did try it with and without syncing with my desktop FF but no result.
The native Chrome browser is lightning fast in comparison to FF.

I am using Firefox Android 28.0.1.
And thanx for the link, will try it.
Have to say though: did a lot of searching here in the forum, on Google and so on. And what strikes me is that there are rather a lot of comments/complaints stating that FF was fast but since a few months ago it became slower. Could not track the precise date or FF version but it looks like this started around 4 months ago?

Lightroom 5.4 to Lightroom Mobile sync is soooo slow - why no local sync?

I am testing the new Lightroom 5.4 with Lightoom Mobile. What really annoys me is the fact that all photos are going up to the Creative Cloud. I have private pictures which should be private. Always. No upload. No Cloud sync. It is important!
Speed is the next major problem. LR 5 is way too slow for a fluid workflow. But this is mentioned from other users.
What absolutely makes me sad ist the sync speed of LR5.4 to LR Mobile. 100 Photos took up to 4 hours. On a typical wedding I have 2000+ images. Depending on the speed of the first 100 photos I have to wait 80+ hours? Are you kiddding me? This makes LR Mobile unusable. My clients are expecting results fast. Speed is one factor to the next contract.
Overall, I don't want to sync anything into the Cloud. I want a to use my fast local sync via WiFi or USB. Only those two options. I want to sync photos even without any internet connection successfully and quickly.
I'm fine with authentication with Adobe servers for licensing verification. But that's it. The rest should be configurable by the users whether they Cloud sync or not.

Tom, thank you for taking your time to come here and enlighten us with the decision making process behind what was done. Like it was said before here, the Lightroom Mobile so far has been very, very frustrating. I came home very excited to test it and make my dream come true. To be able to take my catalog (or a shoot) with me on the subway, etc and be able to choose the photos on my iPad. See, I am a photographer and I shoot mainly fashion and beauty, so my workflow starts as soon as I finish shooting by importing all images into Lightroom and then going through the painstaking process of choosing which picture to use. I would shoot anywhere between 5-12 looks in a day, around 100 photos per look and at the end of the process I need to choose only one photo from each look. This normally involves going back multiple times to be able to get to only one from each look. The LR Mobile would have been the perfect solution for me, making me able to look at photos while out of the office, on the subway, at home, etc. It would have made my editing process much faster (or less slow). Instead, I've been sitting and waiting for 6 hours so far and only 18 photos showed up on my iPad (from the 500+ that were chosen to be synced from my desktop LR. Now I know it's not my internet that is making it that slow because I have 80+Mbps of download and 40+Mbps upload. And that haven't helped me much as my LR is stuck on "Syncing 527 photos" for the last 5 hours. Most professional photographers that I know deal with a huge amount of photos from a photoshoot. Wedding, fashion, advertising, we all shoot 1000+ images in any given work day. To come home and have to wait 100 hours before we are able to edit on the iPad is just not useful. This will be useful for the amateur photographer that will take photos of their children/dog/flowers and want to be able to show their guests the photos without having to get them in front of the computer.
Now I understand what you said about having to have a centralized place so that all the clients up to date on the changes, and I think that is great but I also think that it's paramount that there's a different way of syncing, a faster, more efficient way. Even if it is, like mentioned, not a "everything in sync" solution. Something like sync the desktop to the iPad and only those two work together. If both are changed before the next sync, a "the 'blabla' catalog has been changed since you last synced, do you want to overwrite it?" takes care of the problem, much in the same way that Photoshop asks us when we are saving something that has been somewhat modified by some external agent between saves. But the beauty of shooting all day, loading everything in Lightroom at night at the hotel and in the morning catch your flight and edit your shoot on the iPad while traveling, or being able to show the clients on the iPad right after you shot the wedding, or (what I was dreaming was going to be possible just to have my dreams crushed when started to use it) shooting tethered on the job and giving the art director the iPad so that he/she can see the shots without having to stay in front of the computer during the whole shoot. Now THAT would be a game changer! That was what I was expecting from LR Mobile but unfortunately got disappointed. I'd pay for the app alone if it did that!

Back-up with Time machine is soooo slow.

First back-up with Time Machine. I have a lot of pictures but not much else - but bout 80 GB. Not using encryption.
The back-up has now run for 24 hours - and has only managed to back-up 8 GB - reminaing time estimated to 8 days !
Back-up by wire to external hard disc (USB 3.0 for HD and 2.0 for Mac)
Is this normal?
Anything I could do to speed it up?

You want Lion and MacBook Pro forums.
Yes TM is slow but it depends on the drive interface and disk drive and whether they have trouble with Mac or Lion (or ML)
I prefer to clone and use one partition for that, say 200GB out of your (1.5TB?) drive and use the rest for TM.
How to clone your system:
http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone-backup.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone.html
TimeMachine 101
https://support.apple.com/kb/HT1427
http://pondini.org/TM/Home.html
http://www.apple.com/support/timemachine/
Time Machine stops backing up to external disk
Mac 101: Time Machine Get to know the ins and outs of Time Machine.
Time Machine: Troubleshooting backup issues

Why is my import from DVD-R going soooo SLOW??

OK, I'm very new in the Mac world and am still trying to move my photos from my PC. I burned all of the photos to a DVD-R using the Kodak gallery program. I have 3 DVDs of photos.
Now I am in the process of importing into iPhoto. I opened iPhoto, inserted the DVD #1, and then selected import to library. The first thousand photos imported fine, but the last hundred or so have taken FOREVER...like several minutes per photo.
Should I let this just go overnight, or stop the import and try again?
Has anyone ever experienced this slowness when importing from DVD?
Thanks!
CC

CC:
You would be better off copying the files to a folder on the desktop and then into iPhoto as copying from a disk the file first has to be copied to a temp file and then into iPhoto. I don't know how far you are in the current disk import but for the future ones I'd definitely copy to a folder first and then into iPhoto.
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto (iPhoto.Library for iPhoto 5 and earlier) database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've created an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger or later), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 6 and 7 libraries and Tiger and Leopard. iPhoto does not have to be closed to run the application, just idle. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.≤br>
Note: There now an Automator backup application for iPhoto 5 that will work with Tiger or Leopard.

Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager Soooo Slow

Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager are so slow. Why? Just getting them to open takes five minutes or more.

I'm glad I found this thread.
I loaded the Desktop Manager and Roxio Media Manager 2 days ago. It completely crippled my laptop (running Vista, 4GB RAM etc), which previously ran very well.
I suspected it was Roxio when I watched it take 20 minutes to install.
Worringly, my laptop was crippled without the Desktop or Roxio software being used. The response rate was once every 5 minutes, and when eventually getting to the Task Manager and looking at the Processes and Applications (a 15 minute job!), there was nothing untoward.
Having uninstalled them and rebooted, the laptop is back to its former glory so quite what Roxio was doing in the background, I have no idea. I won't be touching it again.
Matt
Message Edited by mjsulliva on 04-03-2009 05:13 AM

Importing songs from cds soooo slow.....agghh ive no patients!!

when im importing songs from a cd to itunes it is soooooo slow. the time it takes to import the song i could have played it twice! This isnt a major problem as it is still in working order but the speed is rediculous. Does anyone know if there is a setting which i can adjust the speed that songs copy from a cd????? if someone could help it would be great....for my sanity's sake!!!!

I have an elderly Toshiba running XP Pro-SP 2. With iTunes 6.0x I was able to import CD's at 4X-6X. Considering the CD Drive maxes out at 8X - that was OK. Well, 7.0 imported at .1X that is POINT ONE X. And "upgrade" to 7.0.1 increased the speed to a wopping .8X.
I tried making a second library. That got me up to 2X. (My library is over 20Gig - so it seemed to fall into the large library problem zone.)
I went back to 6.0.4 - I am not a happy camper since I couldn't find a "recent" copy of an older version of iTunes. Ended up "rebuilding" my library - lost playlist in the process.
I am happy to have 6.0.4 back and running. I never connected my iPod to 7.0 -
It will be a long time before I install a new version of iTunes. There was no reason for me to upgrade. I was just a little bored when iTunes announced "New Version - want to upgrade?" My fault.
Thanks for listening to my crabbing.
Windows XP Pro

OTN FTP Soooo Slow

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for