Packet loss higher than 100% in SQL Reporting

One of our customers is having network problems and packet loss in their network - according to Lync. The network guys claim these values are unrealistic and there've been no dropped packets on their WAN network.
On the other side, I'm looking at a Call Details Report from Lync SQL Reporting and see this in the gateway leg information:
Audio Stream (Caller -> Callee)
Codec:
PCMU
Sample rate:
8000
Packet utilization:
285
Avg. packet loss rate:
51.20%
Max. packet loss rate:
79.52%
Avg. jitter:
0 ms
Max. jitter:
0 ms
Burst duration:
5980 ms
Burst gap duration:
1890 ms
Burst density:
100.00%
Burst gap density:
0.00%
Avg. concealed samples ratio:
60.00%
Avg. stretched samples ratio:
0.00%
Avg. compressed samples ratio:
0.00%
Avg. network MOS:
1.50
Min. network MOS:
1.50
Avg. network MOS degradation:
2.21
Max. network MOS degradation:
2.21
NMOS degradation (jitter):
0.00%
NMOS degradation (packet loss):
100.00%
Audio Stream (Callee -> Caller)
Codec:
PCMU
Sample rate:
8000
Audio FEC:
False
Bandwidth estimates:
Packet utilization:
146
Avg. packet loss rate:
900.00%
Max. packet loss rate:
900.00%
Avg. jitter:
1540 ms
Max. jitter:
4406 ms
Avg. round trip:
178 ms
Max. round trip:
179 ms
From this I feel there are things to troubleshoot. :-) but how come that Lync reports a 900% packet loss?
I thought that a 100% packet loss was everything... can someone tell me what exactly are these 100+ percentages?
Thanks in advance.

latest patch level :) are you not seeing these values in your Server Performance reports?
The other thing that bugs me is when you have 1 call for 1 second with "900% loss", that would average down to get red values in the summary columns for the other 100 calls as well, as the calls are not counted for seconds, but just piece by piece.
So 8 perfect calls to this one above would average "100% packet loss per call" in the summary, which is just unusable...

Similar Messages

Total of %db time column is greater than 100 in AWR report

Hello,
I have a query regarding "To 5 timed foreground events" section of AWR report.
On many occassions I found that the sum of all the values in the %db time column as mentioned above is grater than 100.
How can percentage be greater than 100?
Event
Waits
Time(s)
Avg wait (ms)
% DB time
Wait Class
DB CPU
29,212
98.18
latch: shared pool
2,291
286
125
0.96
Concurrency
direct path read
147,998
112
1
0.38
User I/O
library cache: mutex X
4,831
92
19
0.31
Concurrency
log file sync
36,736
72
2
0.24
Commit
In the above case the total comes up to just 100.07 % but I have seen reports where the total goes beyond 120 % -130 %.
Can you explain why this happens, please?
Thanks,
Rushi

Can someone explain above situation, please?

High Packet Loss, High Ping and Slow Connection Ov...

Hi There,
I have been a customer with the BT unlimited broadband package for a little under two years and up until recently have had no real issues with the service. This was until around 3/4 weeks ago I noticed that the internet was very slow and certain online games or applications like Netflix would lose all of its quality or stop completely. At first I thought nothing of it and simply reset my BT Home hub router, and sure enough everything was back to normal. However after around 2-3 hours of moderate use (gaming online or watching Netflix) the problem surfaced again.
Now I am lucky if I can get the entire way through a 40 minute TV episode before the quality drops and/or the service requires buffering. I have already contacted BT via the helpline and the service lady ran through the obligatory steps (turn off, wait 5 minutes, reset the home hub etc.) but she failed to understand that although rebooting the home hub does alleviate the problem initially, the symptoms of a slow connection, high packet loss and high ping always return within an hour.
Four the last couple of weeks I have been trying to investigate the problem myself and I have done the following things:
Tested the line using the master socket (no difference)
Opened the ports on my firewall within the home hub (no difference)
Directly wired in the computer instead of relying on the wifi (no difference)
Tested for interference from neighbours wifi using inSSIDider office (it wasn’t, operating on different channels)
Switched every device that requires internet off apart from the PC (no difference)
So with all that in mind I am fairly confident that it is nothing within my house that has caused a significant reduction in internet quality.
Now I have tried my best to display the problem I am having by recording the connection quality for the last 24 hours. The table below represents the condition and quality of the connection after leaving it a period of time without resetting:
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 21:52:14
Downstream:
12.96 Mbps
Upstream:
910 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.7 dB / 5.4 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
987297 / 12745
CRC Events (Down/Up):
254 / 15268
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
2437 / 252630
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
189 / 36430
And here is a result of the ping and packet loss during this time:
Now I immediately reset the home hub after running that test and ran the test again. These are the results I a achieved within 2 minutes of internet connectivity:
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 00:01:05
Downstream:
13.77 Mbps
Upstream:
910 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.4 dB / 5.6 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
159 / 12746
CRC Events (Down/Up):
1 / 15573
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
0 / 252639
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
1 / 36438
Even within the time it has taken to compose this page my internet quality has nose-dived from the previous result above to the following:
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 00:52:31
Downstream:
13.77 Mbps
Upstream:
910 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.1 dB / 5.4 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
29.4 dB / 16.4 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
14544 / 12749
CRC Events (Down/Up):
14 / 15584
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
72 / 252647
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
10 / 36449
What is causing this poor quality in connection and what can be done to rectify the problem?
Thank you for your response in advanced.
Regards,
Richard.

Thank you for you quick reply, I have just moved my hub to the master socket again and re-run the test and I seem to be getting the same results.
ADSL Line Status
Connection Information
Line state:
Connected
Connection time:
0 days, 00:17:47
Downstream:
12.96 Mbps
Upstream:
910 Kbps
ADSL Settings
VPI/VCI:
0/38
Type:
PPPoA
Modulation:
G.992.5 Annex A
Latency type:
Interleaved
Noise margin (Down/Up):
6.0 dB / 5.2 dB
Line attenuation (Down/Up):
28.7 dB / 15.9 dB
Output power (Down/Up):
20.4 dBm / 12.6 dBm
FEC Events (Down/Up):
26417 / 5
CRC Events (Down/Up):
1 / 303
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote):
0 / 0
HEC Events (Down/Up):
31 / 11
Error Seconds (Local/Remote):
10 / 36522
I have also checked if the bell wire was attached and it is not. My socket is of the new type with the inclusion of an inductor on the faceplate. My ADSL filters and modem cable already have the middle connecting pins removed so I don’t think it is a wiring problem, at least in my apartment anyway. I have also searched for problems with the exchange and they are showing green for my area. (Liverpool Central)
I have just rang the quiet line and I do not appear to have any noise on the line. However, all I have is a cordless phone and I know that is not ideal for determining noise due to the radio frequency interfering with the phone speaker.
Again thank you for you time on this issue.
Regards,
Richard

EEM- Email alert with IP SLA Based on Packet Loss

hi joseph,
i need your advise, i want to get alert email based on IP SLA Packet loss
the scenarion as below :
1. If the traffic hit threshold packet loss greater than 20% as long 15 minutes --> send email
2. If reset condition packet loss eq 0% as long 15 minutes --> send email again
I don't know how to configure it condition. could you help me to verify my configuration below?
ip sla logging traps
ip sla 1
icmp-jitter 10.216.0.105 source-ip 10.216.0.107 num-packets 100 interval 40
frequency 50
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip sla reaction-configuration 1 react Packetloss threshold-value 3 1 threshold-type immediate action-type trapOnly
ip sla enable reaction-alerts
event manager applet TEST
event syslog pattern "IP SLAs$1$: Threshold exceeded"
action 2.0 mail server "10.240.0.10" to "[email protected]" from "[email protected]" subject "Alert for Intermittent Link" body "link intermittent in x %"
thank you

What's you have could work with a few modifications. First, increase that threshold-value of 3 to 20. You can leave the falling threshold value of 1. You'll need to add another applet to match the falling threshold syslog message. Not sure exactly what that one will look like.
The first applet will look like this:
event manager environment q "
event manager applet ipsla-threshold-exceeded
event syslog pattern "IP SLAs$1$: Threshold exceeded"
action 001 cli command "enable"
action 002 cli command "config t"
action 003 cli command "no event manager applet ipsla-healthy"
action 004 cli command "event manager applet ipsla-unhealthy"
action 005 cli command "event timer countdown time 900"
action 006 cli command "action 1.0 mail server $q 10.240.0.10$q to $q [email protected]$q from $q [email protected]$q subject $q Alert for Intermittent Link$q body $q link intermittent in 20 %$q"
action 007 cli command "action 2.0 cli command enable"
action 008 cli command "action 3.0 cli command $q config t$q"
action 009 cli command "action 4.0 cli command $q no event manager applet ipsla-unhealthy$q"
action 010 cli command "action 5.0 cli command end"
action 011 cli command "end"
And the second applet (the one where you'll need to fill in the appropriate syslog pattern) will look like:
event manager applet ipsla-threshold-normal
event syslog pattern "FALLING THRESHOLD PATTERN HERE"
action 001 cli command "enable"
action 002 cli command "config t"
action 003 cli command "no event manager applet ipsla-unhealthy"
action 004 cli command "event manager applet ipsla-healthy"
action 005 cli command "event timer countdown time 900"
action 006 cli command "action 1.0 mail server $q 10.240.0.10$q to $q [email protected]$q from $q [email protected]$q subject $q Link is stable$q body $q Link has been stable for 15 minutes$q"
action 007 cli command "action 2.0 cli command enable"
action 008 cli command "action 3.0 cli command $q config t$q"
action 009 cli command "action 4.0 cli command $q no event manager applet ipsla-healthy$q"
action 010 cli command "action 5.0 cli command end"
action 011 cli command "end"

How can I list more than 100 VI's during Object find?

I am trying to use the LabVIEW 6 Find tool. When I select Object and VI it only lists 100 subvi's within the application. Is there a way to increase the number of subvi's listed?
Attachments:
LabVIEW_Find_example.bmp ‏974 KB

Use the "VIs by Name" option. I'm not sure what the limit is on that one, but it should be higher than 100.
Remember that Alliance Members are here to help. We do this stuff every day.
Daniel L. Press
PrimeTest Corp.
www.primetest.com

Dynamic Calc processor cannot lock more than [100] ESM blocks during the calculation, please increase CalcLockBlock setting and then retry(a small data cache setting could also cause this problem, please check the data cache size setting).

Hi,
Our Environment is Essbase 11.1.2.2 and working on Essbase EAS and Shared Services components.One of our user tried to run the Cal Script of one Application and faced this error.
Dynamic Calc processor cannot lock more than [100] ESM blocks during the calculation, please increase CalcLockBlock setting and then retry(a small data cache setting could also cause this problem, please check the data cache size setting).
I have done some Google and found that we need to add something in Essbase.cfg file like below.
1012704 Dynamic Calc processor cannot lock more than number ESM blocks during the calculation, please increase CalcLockBlock setting and then retry (a small data cache setting could also cause this problem, please check the data cache size setting).
Possible Problems
Analytic Services could not lock enough blocks to perform the calculation.
Possible Solutions
Increase the number of blocks that Analytic Services can allocate for a calculation:
Set the maximum number of blocks that Analytic Services can allocate to at least 500.
If you do not have an $ARBORPATH/bin/essbase.cfg file on the server computer, create one using a text editor.
In the essbase.cfg file on the server computer, set CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH to 500.
Stop and restart Analytic Server.
Add the SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH command to the beginning of the calculation script.
Set the data cache large enough to hold all the blocks specified in the CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH setting.
Determine the block size.
Set the data catche size.
Actually in our Server Config file(essbase.cfg) we dont have below data added.
CalcLockBlockHigh 2000
CalcLockBlockDefault 200
CalcLockBlocklow 50
So my doubt is if we edit the Essbase.cfg file and add the above settings and restart the services will it work? and if so why should we change the Server config file if the problem is with one application Cal Script. Please guide me how to proceed.
Regards,
Naveen

Your calculation needs to hold more blocks in memory than your current set up allows.
From the docs (quoting so I don't have to write it, not to be a smarta***:
CALCLOCKBLOCK specifies the number of blocks that can be fixed at each level of the SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH | DEFAULT | LOW calculation script command.
When a block is calculated, Essbase fixes (gets addressability to) the block along with the blocks containing its children. Essbase calculates the block and then releases it along with the blocks containing its children. By default, Essbase allows up to 100 blocks to be fixed concurrently when calculating a block. This is sufficient for most database calculations. However, you may want to set a number higher than 100 if you are consolidating very large numbers of children in a formula calculation. This ensures that Essbase can fix all the required blocks when calculating a data block and that performance will not be impaired.
Example
If the essbase.cfg file contains the following settings:
CALCLOCKBLOCKHIGH 500 CALCLOCKBLOCKDEFAULT 200 CALCLOCKBLOCKLOW 50
then you can use the following SET LOCKBLOCK setting commands in a calculation script:
SET LOCKBLOCK HIGH;
means that Essbase can fix up to 500 data blocks when calculating one block.
Support doc is saying to change your config file so those settings can be made available for any calc script to use.
On a side note, if this was working previously and now isn't then it is worth investigating if this is simply due to standard growth or a recent change that has made an unexpected significant impact.

High Packet Loss on Media Gateway and Mediation Server leg

Hello,
We have recently begun to receive SCOM alerts showing a high percentage of poor voice quality on calls that are being sent to voicemail. QoE Reports show an extremely high packet loss on the Media Gateway and Mediation Server leg of the call.
The SCOM alerts are similar to this:
Alert: Media quality alert for gateway and Mediation Server leg
Source: Microsoft.LS.2010.QoE.Metric.AudioQuality.GatewayMS
Path: MonServer01;10.1.1.1 - FESERVER01;10.1.1.1 - FESERVER01 Last modified by: System Last modified time: 9/13/2013 9:16:17 AM Alert description:
Following are the details for this media quality alert:
Media quality alert for: Gateway and Mediation Server leg "10.1.1.1 - FESERVER01"
Total calls = 51
Poor quality calls = 12
Poor quality call percentage (%) = 23.53
Following are the average values for call classification metrics:
Average network degradation = 0.08
Average jitter (ms) = 1.86
Average packet loss (%) = 3.71
Average round trip time (ms) = 0.00
Average concealed metric (%) = 16.33
Average stretched metric (%) = 0.57
Average compressed metric (%) = 0.92
These alerts did not seem to be popping up until we enabled Media Bypass and CAC. The call setup looks like this:
MEDIANT 3000 -> MEDIATION SERVER -> UM SERVER
We have had our networking team take a look at all legs of the network between subnets and they do not find any dropped packets.
Any ideas what might be causing this to happen ONLY on calls that are transferred to voicemail?
Thanks.
-John Boslooper
VWGoA Lync Administrator
John K. Boslooper Unified Communication Engineer

Please try to disable Media Bypass and CAC to check if still have the issue.
Try to enable Media Bypass and CAC one at a time to check which cause the packet loss.
Tyr to use Lync Logging Tool to collect trace file on Lync Mediation Server.
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.
Hi Lisa,
I Turned off CAC and left Media Bypass on. I received 87% packet loss, although when listening to the voicemail, I heard no drops at all. Here are the stats:
Audio Stream (Caller -> Callee)
    Codec: PCMA Sample rate: 8000
    Packet utilization: 947
    Avg. packet loss rate: 26.40 % Max. packet loss rate: 87.11 %
    Avg. jitter: 1 ms Max. jitter: 3 ms
    Burst duration: 5000 ms Burst gap duration: 8690 ms
    Burst density: 100.00 % Burst gap density: 0.00 %
    Avg. concealed samples ratio: 21.00 % Avg. stretched samples ratio: 0.00 %
    Avg. compressed samples ratio: 0.00 %
    Avg. network MOS: 1.91 Min. network MOS: 1.50
    Avg. network MOS degradation: 1.81 Max. network MOS degradation: 2.23
    NMOS degradation (jitter): 0.00 % NMOS degradation (packet loss): 99.00 %
    Audio Stream (Callee -> Caller)
    Codec: PCMA Sample rate: 8000
    Audio FEC: False Bandwidth estimates: 0 Kbps
    Packet utilization: 658
    Avg. packet loss rate: 0.00 % Max. packet loss rate: 0.00 %
    Avg. jitter: 0 ms Max. jitter: 0 ms
    Avg. round trip: 0 ms Max. round trip: 0 ms
Then I turned on CAC and turned off Media Bypass. Left a message. 0% Packet Loss. Voicemail sounded perfect once again. Here are the stats:
Audio Stream (Callee -> Caller)
    Codec: PCMA Sample rate: 8000
    Audio FEC: False Bandwidth estimates: 0 Kbps
    Packet utilization: 1066
    Avg. packet loss rate: 0.00 % Max. packet loss rate: 0.00 %
    Avg. jitter: 0 ms Max. jitter: 0 ms
    Avg. round trip: 0 ms Max. round trip: 0 ms
    Audio Stream (Caller -> Callee)
    Codec: PCMA Sample rate: 8000
    Packet utilization: 1866
    Avg. packet loss rate: 0.00 % Max. packet loss rate: 0.00 %
    Avg. jitter: 2 ms Max. jitter: 9 ms
    Burst duration: 0 ms Burst gap duration: 36000 ms
    Burst density: 0.00 % Burst gap density: 0.00 %
    Avg. concealed samples ratio: 0.00 % Avg. stretched samples ratio: 1.00 %
    Avg. compressed samples ratio: 4.00 %
    Avg. network MOS: 3.58 Min. network MOS: 3.54
    Avg. network MOS degradation: 0.15 Max. network MOS degradation: 0.18
    NMOS degradation (jitter): 0.00 % NMOS degradation (packet loss): 0.00 %
The kicker is, with media bybass enabled, the call going to Voicemail (Exchange UM) is not a media bypass call. The Lync Mediation server is handling the call in both instances (Media Bypass ON or OFF).
I'm thinking it's a problem with the reporting feature since no visible/physical packet loss can be seen or heard. Our issue also lies with the fact that it's throwing of our call quality stats for the day because of the amount of "poor calls" going
to voicemail.
I would really love to figure this out. Any thoughts?
John K. Boslooper Unified Communication Engineer

High ping and packet loss.

How do i fix high ping and packet loss? Also when i ping my own ip, it results in 100.0% packet loss.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, by a peripheral device, by a font conflict, or by corruption of the file system or of certain system caches.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards, if applicable. Start up in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. You must hold down the shift key twice: once when you turn on the computer, and again when you log in.
Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the startup volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Ask for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to start up and run than normal, with limited graphics performance, and some things won’t work at all, including sound output and Wi-Fi on certain models. The next normal startup may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually login automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin.
Test while in safe mode. Same problem?
After testing, restart as usual (not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Reports with more than 100 columns

I am using Apex 3.2. I am using a classic report with more than 100 columns. So to use the custom heading in the report, I exported the page,did modification in exported sql file and imported back.
But when I am passing the parameters from a input screen for the first time either it is showing the all data avilable in the database or with only header. If I do the refresh in input screen and try it then it is working as intended. I am updating at the below loaction of the page.Let me know if I have to update anything more in the sql file.
declare
s varchar2(32767) := null;
begin
s := null;
wwv_flow_api.create_report_columns (
p_id=> 200100535534034253 + wwv_flow_api.g_id_offset,
p_region_id=> 2003453533453 + wwv_flow_api.g_id_offset,
p_flow_id=> wwv_flow.g_flow_id,
p_query_column_id=> 157,
p_form_element_id=> null,
p_column_alias=> 'XYZ',
p_column_display_sequence=> 157,
p_column_heading=> 'XYZ 123',
p_column_alignment=>'LEFT',
p_disable_sort_column=>'Y',
p_sum_column=> 'N',
p_hidden_column=> 'N',
p_display_as=>'WITHOUT_MODIFICATION',
p_pk_col_source=> s,
p_column_comment=>'');
end;
/

Hi,
Its just a general thought and I realize you know your application and user community better I do, but do you think your users are going to be very happy when they are presented with a report with more than a hundred columns? Have you considered maybe presenting the data in some sort of rolled up form from which the user can then drill down to the data they are particularly interested in. Also, I'm sure your LAN administrator would be happy not to see 100+ column by x number row reports being regularly shipped across the network.
Also, 100+ column reports suggests tables with 100+ columns which are probably not designed in a very relationally compliant way. I find that good DB design usually results in applications that have to make less compromises, such as hacking export files in order to fool the API into making ridiculous, unsupported and unsupportable compromises.
Just a thought..................
Regards
Andre

Anyone else on 4G LTE seeing fairly high packet loss recently?

For the past week or two I've been noticing quite a bit of packet loss when I run a ping test against 8.8.8.8 (Google DNS) or Yahoo. Each time I run the ping test for 250-500 pings and the packet loss is consistently around 3-5% which is high. Verizon just upgraded the tower in my area to 4G LTE around 3-4 weeks ago and so far my speeds have been pretty great (20-35 Mbps) and my signal is strong without fluctuation (-67 dBi, SINR 20-30) so it's just the packet loss that I'm dealing with.
The first week of being on the 4G LTE I ran a few quick ping tests against Google while setting up my 4G antenna and didn't notice any packet loss but maybe I just didn't run the tests long enough. I've tried pinging a few other servers like 4.2.2.2 (Verizon DNS) and 208.67.220.220 (OpenDNS) and I'm seeing like maybe one dropped packet in 500 pings which is only a .2% packet loss which is a huge difference from results I get pinging Google and Yahoo.
Anyone else noticing packet loss on your 4G LTE connection? I've already opened a ticket with Verizon but I don't know if they'll do anything about it since they like to just tag my location as a marginal coverage area and not look into issues when I report them.

I have as well. I am in Jacksonville, FL and notice when I put my phone into hotspot mode that any machine attached to it will suffer between 6-10% packet loss. It happens in spurts- at first when I connect it is perfect. 60ms pings to www.google.com and barely 1-2 lost packets in the first 5-10 minutes. Then all of a suddenly the whole thing just goes to pot. At first it starts losing a few packets... then it starts losing a BUNCH of packets. Then it gets so bad I start going from the "Request timed out" message to it being "Reply from 192.168.1.1: Destination net unreachable.". This continues for several minutes and then it returns to semi-normality. So a few minutes working, a few minutes not. It's pretty unbearable.
The really frustrating part is seeing AT&T users right next to me with almost 0% packet loss ;_; In the end, I usually have to connect to their phone to do any browsing, since mine simply doesn't allow me to do even the simplest of internet navigation when it gets like that.

Having really high pings, packet loss and been on ...

Hi. I've been on to BT 4-5 times in the last few weeks. Everytime its the same thing I do all their checks and run the speed test. Its the same thing over and over. When i try to explain to them the problems i,m having they said your speed is within the acceptable range. I,m at a loss with dealing with BT. The customer server is terrible.
Basically the problems i,m having is really high pings. Even doing the BTwholesale speedtest my pings was usally in the 30ms range now they are 70 on average now. I play alot of online games. And Everything is unplayable. I know there is definitely something wrong. Either with the routing or some of the nodes on bt.
Today I was trying to play Diablo 3, the lag spikes was huge every 2-3 seconds jumping to 1-2k ms latency. I ran some winMTR tests and i,m having alot of packet loss. I tried to explain that to BT on the phone. But its like the dont have a clue what i,m talking about or wont attempt to help me with the issue. All game companies usally tell me ISPs are always willing to help with these problems. But BT seem to refuse to help with latency ping issues, just your speed is fine etc .
I,ve also noticed people in the BT forums saying something about G.INP and people needing HH5 Type B. Can someone explain to me what this is or if its something happening to my cabinate. I,m using the BT HH5 type A. From what i see the about the G.INP sounds like the issues i,m currently facing.
Can some Mod please help me. I,m really losing hope with BT.

Hi Guys.
Still facing these issues. Is BT not going to do anything about it? Here is a WinMTR test to a game server i,m playing.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| WinMTR statistics |
| Host - % | Sent | Recv | Best | Avrg | Wrst | Last |
|------------------------------------------------|------|------|------|------|------|------|
| BTHUB5 - 0 | 1132 | 1132 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 217.41.216.109 - 7 | 901 | 843 | 18 | 30 | 394 | 20 |
| 213.120.158.234 - 7 | 909 | 853 | 21 | 25 | 51 | 23 |
| 31.55.165.151 - 7 | 905 | 848 | 20 | 25 | 51 | 23 |
| 31.55.165.109 - 7 | 905 | 848 | 21 | 25 | 49 | 23 |
| 109.159.250.180 - 7 | 897 | 838 | 20 | 25 | 63 | 23 |
| core1-te0-13-0-16.ilford.ukcore.bt.net - 7 | 913 | 858 | 27 | 34 | 57 | 33 |
| peer6-0-9-0-22.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net - 6 | 917 | 863 | 27 | 32 | 56 | 32 |
| 166-49-211-240.eu.bt.net - 7 | 913 | 858 | 28 | 32 | 59 | 28 |
| 213.248.82.249 - 7 | 909 | 853 | 0 | 33 | 93 | 29 |
| ldn-bb2-link.telia.net - 7 | 909 | 853 | 28 | 36 | 127 | 70 |
| adm-bb4-link.telia.net - 7 | 909 | 853 | 32 | 37 | 76 | 34 |
| adm-b4-link.telia.net - 6 | 917 | 863 | 34 | 38 | 65 | 35 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No response from host - 100 | 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|________________________________________________|______|______|______|______|______|______|
217.41.216.109 seems to be an issue with this. Getting packet loss of 7% and the the ping shoots up to almost 400 while the average is around 30.
I,ve tried everything BT have told me, i've phoned loads and loads of times to seek help. I dont know what else to do. Pings and latency is horrible. And i dont just mean little lag. Every online game is unplayable. Webpage loading slowing or broken images .

Experiencing high packet loss.

Hello, I am experiencing relatively high packet loss, in particular when connected to my teamspeak server which is at andesite.typefrag.com.
Here is my tracert
Tracing route to andesite.typefrag.com [54.209.243.18]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2 8 ms 6 ms 7 ms L100.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-83.verizon-gni.net [173.70.104.1]
3 8 ms 12 ms 9 ms G0-13-0-2.NWRKNJ-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.216.128]
4 6 ms 7 ms 6 ms ae3-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.199.186]
5 13 ms 18 ms 11 ms 0.xe-3-0-1.BR1.NYC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.5.149]
6 11 ms 59 ms 10 ms jfk-brdr-04.inet.qwest.net [63.235.40.53]
7 * 20 ms * dca2-edge-01.inet.qwest.net [67.14.36.10]
8 18 ms 19 ms 19 ms 65.120.78.82
9 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms 72.21.220.149
10 20 ms 19 ms 21 ms 72.21.222.129
11 * * * Request timed out.
12 * * * Request timed out.
13 * * * Request timed out.
14 22 ms 19 ms 19 ms ec2-54-209-243-18.compute-1.amazonaws.com [54.209.243.18]
Trace complete.
I am not exactly sure what to make of this or where to go at this point in resolving the issue, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.

Where are you experiencing packet loss? I see ICMP de-priortization at 1 hop and 100% dropping of ICMP at 3 of the 4 last hops but otherwise no packet loss. What sort of issues are you having? It's packet loss at the destination that is the issue, not in between. It's not uncommon for hops between source and destination to drop some or all ICMP packets as they're more concerned with legitimate data.
WinMTR statistics
Host
Sent
Recv
Best
Avrg
Wrst
Last
L100.PITBPA-VFTTP-33.verizon-gni.net
0
219
219
2
4
42
2
G0-1-0-5.PITBPA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net
1
215
214
2
5
11
5
xe-0-1-0-0.PHIL-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net
0
219
219
10
19
163
10
0.xe-7-3-0.BR1.IAD8.ALTER.NET
0
219
219
15
18
72
16
dcp-brdr-03.inet.qwest.net
0
219
219
15
17
82
17
dca2-edge-01.inet.qwest.net
1
215
214
15
17
69
15
65.120.78.82
0
219
219
15
17
83
16
72.21.220.149
0
219
219
17
18
26
18
205.251.245.63
0
219
219
17
24
56
41
No response from host
100
43
0
0
0
0
0
No response from host
100
43
0
0
0
0
0
No response from host
100
43
0
0
0
0
0
ec2-54-209-243-18.compute-1.amazonaws.com
0
219
219
15
16
26
17

Report resolution (96DPI or higher than 96 DPI) in regards to image quality

We have discovered that the default rendering mode for reports in WebI is 96 DPI, even though the SDK seems to allow more flexibility than that, so we are wondering if there is some hidden option to cause WebI to render content at a higher DPI.
The specific problem we are having is in regards to some images that render very poorly at 96 DPI in our reports. We can render them at a higher DPI (say 300 DPI for better print quality) and then allow them to be scaled down using the "Stretch" option, but the quality is not nearly as good as our imaging software, and the solution does not work in HTML mode. So that's not an option.
To be honest, I'm surprised about the way things work in this regard, because we should be able to produce high quality images in our reports. 96 DPI is never used for final print quality work. At least InfoView has an option for CrystalReports to render at 120 DPI, but I'm not sure if that only effects the display or not, and if it automatically adjusts offsets that were calculated at 96 DPI when the report was designed.
If we could somehow determine the display mode in a function (e.g., print versus display, or get the DPI, or PDF/HTML/JRP, or something), then we might be able to use a different image (each rendered at a different DPI) depending on the mode. That would be an odd workaround, but if there's no way to change the resolution, this would be great also.
Any suggestions on either front? We need these images to display with at least a "normal" print quality resolution.

Please refer to SAP Knowledge Base Article 1307814 - File size is disproportionately large when Web Intelligence 3.1 report with charts is saved to PDF format .
Pasting the resolution details below:
For WebIntelligence version XIR2
Install BOXIR2 Service Pack 4 FP 4.10 : in this release, developers have given the option to edit the DPI setting.
To solve this problem, change the resolution to 96 DPI in the webiviewer.properties file at the following location :
<ApplicationServer-Webapps>/businessobjects/enterprise115/desktoplaunch/WEB_INF/classes/ webiviewer.properties
For BOXI3.1, the DPI setting remains as default 300.
To solve the problem edit the DPI value in this xml file under the pdf section where the comment says you can edit in the path :
<installed directory>\win32_x86\config\bobjserver\caching_media_profiles.xml
2. Restart the servers
Note : Take necessary back up of the files before doing any changes. Also any new patches if applied, you might be required to re-do the changes to the respective files. Please edit the files carefully ONLY under the sections which says you can edit the DPI Values.

Three devices on network: 100% packet loss for my iMac.

I'm having intermittent bouts of 100% packet-loss pinging my router from my iMac, at the same time my iPod touch and neighbor's Windows laptop are surfing wirelessly from the same router.
Sometimes these bouts resolve spontaneously. Otherwise I need to shut down, wait, and restart my iMac to reconnect. The longer the shut down, the longer I can connect it seems.
The problem started a few days ago, after months of trouble-free performance with the same settings. The computer usually stayed up all the time. I hoped in vain today's OSX 10.5.4 and AirPort firmware updates would fix the problem ...
Post 10pm is the most common problem time, 'tho I'm not sure if that's a function of my iMac's uptime (wireless module is cooking?) or some electronic interference firing up near by. Maybe a virus?
Known potential sources of interference have been around for months/years: my old wireless 'phone is a 900MHz model, the next door neighbor's satellite antenna's been up for months. The dodgy power in this old building is hopefully offset by the APC UPS that powers my Mac.
Do I keep fiddling with the AirPort channels, or do I take my computer back to the shop for (another) warranty repair?
Greg./

No, I'm not letting my neighbor steal my signal. He's subletting off me, and his access to my network (WPA2 encryption) is part of the "deal". He's a bit of a night-owl, and the late night download limit is pretty big, so it works fine all round.
I used his laptop's (and my iPod Touch's) uninterrupted access (while my iMac's floundering in packet-loss purgatory) as a way of "narrowing down" to the prime suspect: the iMac wireless module.
Greg./
ps sorry about the unnecessary alliteration; I had to substitute "purgatory" because the forum software censors "****" (aich, ee, ell, ell).
Message was edited by: gregreedee
Message was edited by: gregreedee

Ms Project 2013 report for resource name, tasks less than 100% complete within a date range I can set each time

I have seen I can create a report for a resource name with a specified date range, and one that can show me for a resource name any incomplete tasks, but I want to do the following and cant work out how to state it in the report constructor:
resource name equals - {I want to set a given resource in here}
% complete is less than 100%
start - date range is between [today -7 days] and [today +7 days]
Please can someone show me how this is possible, I know it will be and it is me that has been defeated!!

workspacedesign,
Oops, my bad. I missed the point that the Name field for assignment rows will be the task name and that's not what you want. There is also a glitch in the date range filter. So, here's how to fix that.
First, in the Resource Usage view, copy the Name field to Text1. Now select the resource line and do a fill down for all assignments under that resource. Do that for each resource. This could be automated with VBA, but for now, a manual setup should work
fine.
Second, instead of testing for the Name field in the filter, test for the Text1 field.
Third, change the Finish test to be "less than or equal to".
Now when you apply that filter, enter beginning date of your range and then the ending date of your range followed by the resource name. You should get the data you want.
Unfortunately formulas in custom fields are not as flexible in Project as they are in Excel. For example, in Project a formula can only operate on data for that row. Further, even if you use the formula Today() +7 for your filter criteria, the first time
the filter is used, Project will hard code today's date into the filter. The normal way around both of these shortcomings is to use VBA.
Hope this helps.
John

Packet loss higher than 100% in SQL Reporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for