Pantone Bridge and Solid looks different on screen

Why the same Pantone Coated colour looks different on screen between the Bridge palette and the Solid palette. If I compare the same colour on the 2 printed coated palettes, they look the same

Thank you so much for responding! Here are answers & below screenshot of my Distiller settings:
Platform = Windows
Frame version = 8
Rendering workflow = I print to .ps and then distill to PDF.
What settings in Distiller? I tried the "Tag all images for color management" in Distiller with sRGB selected as the color model, but it still came out lime---however, when I chose "Convert All Colors to CMYK" it kept the green color BUT then greyed out my images!!! I have attached a screenshot of the settings---can you see it?
sRGB = The artist had no idea was sRGB was (he is not really helpful at all...).
Any suggestions on how to get my images back...? Thanks so much.

Similar Messages

Why does 44k and 88k look different?

hi,
ive been using some 88k files for high qual recording, now i want all my files at 44k, so i convert them all, but looking the wave overview the 'level' appears to have dropped to nearly 50% of what it was for each file.
is this just a visual artefact of the way logic shows sample rates, it doesnt sound any quieter.

although the sounds are identical in level shown in any level meter i have.....they 'look' different on screen.
the 88k>44k convert is at the top compared to the original 88k file below it.....this seems to be a naormal artefact as this often happens when i use pitch time machine to change some samples' speeds......

Why do RGB colour references look different on screen in Illustrator and Adobe Muse?

Prior to a December upgrade to CC versions of Illustrator and Photoshop and an upgrade to Muse, RGB colours looked consistent in all 3. Now they do not and I don't understand why there has been this change. I cannot see a way of pulling them all into line. I always synchronise colours via Bridge.

For colors on the web it is best to use web safe colors. Non-websafe colors can and will give different looks in different browsers and file types.

Saving files in PS and they look different in Bridge

I am opening files from Bridge into PS CC that have been altered in ACR recently, making changes (cropping, tonal values inc exposure, one with a Curve adjustment and layer mask for further control) and saving them to another folder under the same directory/folder. When I go back to Bridge the image either shows no changes or it's lighter and looks like I've made some very distructive corrections. Opening it again in PS and it looks perfectly okay. Windows 7 platform. What can be going on? Thank you in advance for your help. Joe

I have restarted my computer and the same issue remained.
I closed Bridge again. Reopened it while holding down Ctrl to possibly reset the Prefs. However, I didn't like the way the options read so selected Cancel.
Everything seems to be functioning correctly now.
I don't know what happened or why and would certainly appreciate any insight as to what might have happened.
I'm no newbie to PS nor Bridge as have been using them since mid 90s. Don't remember anything like this before.
Thanks again for any feedback.
Joe

IPhone 5 looks different. Screen a bit more wider.

My iPhone 5 looks a bit different. The screen seems to be a bit more wider and a bit taller. I've used many cases including a knock-off LifeProof. After taking off the knock-off Lifeproof, this is where my phone started to look different.

Here is the full image link: http://i.imgur.com/KYftDT5.jpg

JMS bridge and MQSeries. looking for statistics

          Hi !
          I have to use Weblogic 7 SP4 in cluster with a distant MQSeries queue manager.
          I know I can't have a "exactly once" quality of service. I use a MDB (deplyed
          on each instance of the server).
          I'm looking for statistics about how often a message can be treated 2 (or more)
          times.
          Thanks a lot for any help !
          Florent


Hi Florent,
          Since these are MQ messages, it might be possible to find
          such statistics in MQ. Also, I think that MQ stores a
          redelivery count in their messages - so you can likely
          instrument your application code to get at the count.
          Note that 7.0 actually does support exactly once with WL MDBs driven
          by MQ. If you use transactions you can infer some stats on redeliveries
          by checking the relevant transaction statistics for rollback counts.
          I'm attaching some notes on JMS integration for your
          convenience.
          Tom
          florent wrote:
          > Hi !
          >
          > I have to use Weblogic 7 SP4 in cluster with a distant MQSeries queue manager.
          > I know I can't have a "exactly once" quality of service. I use a MDB (deplyed
          > on each instance of the server).
          >
          > I'm looking for statistics about how often a message can be treated 2 (or more)
          > times.
          >
          > Thanks a lot for any help !
          >
          > Florent
          JMS Integration of Foreign Vendors with BEA WebLogic Server
          The following notes are derived mostly from "http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/jms/index.jsp".
          For additional questions, a good forum for WebLogic questions in general is "newsgroups.bea.com". These can be mined for information by using Google's newsgroup search function.
          JMS Integration Overview
          - For integration with "non-Java" and/or "non-JMS" platforms, see "Non-Java Integration Options" below.
          - For a foreign JMS vendor to participate in a WL transaction it must support XA. Specifically, it must support the javax.jms.XA* interfaces.
          - In WL versions 6.0 and up it is possible to make synchronous calls to foreign JMS vendors participate in a WL transaction as long as the foreign vendor supports XA.
          - WL 6.0 and 6.1 MDBs can be driven by foreign vendors non-transactionally. They can be driven transactionally by a select few foreign vendors (MQ is not part of the select few)
          - WL 7.0 and later, MDBs can be driven by foreign vendors transactionally and non-transationally.
          - WL 6.1 and later WL provides a messaging bridge feature. Messaging bridges forward messages between any two JMS destinations, including foreign destinations, and can transfer messages transactionally or non-transactionally.
          - WL 8.1 JMS provides additional features that simplify transactional and JNDI integration of foreign vendors. See http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/intro.html#jms_features
          Integration with 8.1 Details
          A good overview of 8.1 JMS interop capability is the presentation "Integrating Foreign JMS Providers with BEA WebLogic Server" here:
          http://www.bea.com/content/files/eworld/presentations/Wed_03_05_03/Application_Servers/1097-Foreign_JMS_Providers_WLS.pdf
          This document refers to helpful new 8.1 features, which simplify integration. These include:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ConsoleHelp/jms_config.html#accessing_foreign_providers
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/j2ee_components.html#1033768
          And are also summarized here (under interoperability):
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jms/intro.html#jms_features
          Also read the extensive MDB documentation, which extensively covers integrating foreign vendors:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ejb/message_beans.html
          The 8.1 features are likely sufficient for most 8.1 integration needs, and you may not need to refer "Using Foreign JMS Providers With WLS" white-paper mentioned below.
          Integration with 6.1 and 7.0 Details
          Read the "Using Foreign JMS Providers With WLS" white-paper:
          http://dev2dev.bea.com/products/wlserver/whitepapers/jmsproviders.jsp
          Note that this white-paper does not take into account 8.1 features.
          For 7.0 read the extensive 8.1 MDB documentation, which largely also applies to 7.0:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ejb/message_beans.html
          Non-Java Integration Options
          - WL JMS has a JNI based C client which is available for Windows and some UNIX platforms. This C client supports 7.0 and up, and will be officially packaged with WLS in 9.0 (virtually unchanged). The C API is currently only supported through the jms newsgroup. See "JMS C API", here:
          http://dev2dev.bea.com/technologies/jms/index.jsp
          - WL supports direct Windows COM access through its "JCOM" feature. This doesn't include the JMS API, but one can invoke EJBs which in turn invoke JMS. See
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/jcom.html
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/jcom/
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/jcom/
          - Similar to JCOM, but more advanced, WL supports IIOP standard based access on multiple platforms. You can use the BEA Tuxedo C client for this purpose (no license fee). This doesn't include the JMS API, but one can invoke EJBs which in turn invoke JMS. See
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs81/rmi_iiop/
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/rmi_iiop/
          http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/rmi_iiop/
          Unlike most other approaches, the IIOP client approach also allows the client to begin and commit user (JTA) transactions (not configured).
          - If you already have a BEA Tuxedo license, one option is communicate through BEA Tuxedo (which has various APIs on Windows) and configure a WebLogic Server to respond to these requests via the WTC bridge. Search for "WTC" in the BEA docs. Unlike most other approaches, the Tuxedo API approach also allows the client to begin and commit user (JTA) transactions.
          - Another approach is to interop via web-service standards. Or even to simply to invoke a servlet on the WL server using a basic HTTP call from Windows. These in turn can invoke the JMS API. There is a white-paper on "Interoperability Study of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 and Microsoft .NET 1.1 Web Services", that demonstrates web-services here:
          http://ftpna2.bea.com/pub/downloads/WebLogic-DotNet-Interop.pdf
          - Yet another approach is to use a third party product that is designed to wrap any JMS vendor. There are even open source versions. In no particular order, here are some examples: Open3 WinJMS, CodeMesh, Active JMS, SpiritSoft
          - Finally, there are .NET/C/C++ integration libraries that not specific to JMS, some examples are JNBridge, Jace, and CodeMesh.
          Notes on MQ Remote Capable XA Clients
          Until recently, IBM MQ JMS clients could not work transactionally unless they were running on the same host as their MQ server. This is a limitation unique to MQ that was relaxed with the introduction of IBM's new "WebSphere MQ Extended Transactional Client". See:
          http://publibfp.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/csqzar00.pdf
          The product is new, and for some reason, configuration of this client seems to be tricky, even when WebLogic is not involved at all. Oddly, the main sticking point seems to be simply making sure that class paths refer to the required IBM jars:
          - Required on WLS where MQ objects are bound into JNDI:
          com.ibm.mq.jar, com.ibm.mqjms.jar
          - Required only if MQ objects are bound into JNDI on a different server:
          com.ibm.mq.jar
          If there are problems when using this client, first get it to work using a pure IBM client without any BEA classes involved. Once that is working, search the WL JMS newsgroup for answers and/or contact BEA customer support.
          Notes on Oracle AQ Integration
          If problems are encountered integrating Oracle's built-in queuing (Oracle AQ) JMS client, there is publicly available wrapper code that can aid integrating AQ directly into MDBs, JMS, or the messaging bridge. The solution is titled "Startup class to bind AQ/Referenceable objects to WLS JNDI", is not supported by BEA, and is posted to:
          http://dev2dev.bea.com/codelibrary/code/startupclass.jsp
          Caveats:
          The solution doesn't directly support concurrent consumers. Perhaps Oracle requires that concurrent consumers each have a unique JMS connection? As a work-around, parallel message processing can be achieved indirectly by forwarding AQ messages into a WL JMS destination - which do support concurrent processing.
          Up-to-date versions of Oracle may be required. For more information, google search the weblogic.developer.interest.jms newsgroup for "Oracle" and "AQ".
          The solution doesn't seem to support transactions, it may be possible to extend it to do so.
          MDB Thread Pool Notes
          WL7.0SP? and WL8.1 and later support the "dispatch-policy" field to specify which thread pool an MDB uses to run its instances. In most cases this field should be configured to help address potential performance issues and/or dead-locks:
          http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs81/ejb/DDreference-ejb-jar.html#dispatch-policy
          (Note that "dispatch-policy" is ignored for non-transactional foreign vendors; in this case, the MDB "onMessage" callback runs in the foreign vendor's thread.)
          MDB Concurrency Notes
          Queue MDBs driven by foreign providers can run multiple instances concurrently. Topic MDBs driven by foreign providers are limited to one instance (not sure, but transactional foreign driven topic MDBs may not have this limitation). The size of the thread pool that the MDB runs in and the "max-beans-in-free-pool" descriptor limit how many instances run concurrently.
          Design Guide-Lines and Performance Tuning Notes
          The "WebLogic JMS Performance Guide" white-paper contains detailed design, performance, and tuning information for Clustering, Messaging Bridge, JMS, and MDBs.
          http://dev2dev.bea.com/products/wlserver/whitepapers/WL_JMS_Perform_GD.jsp

Scanned images in LR and PS look different.

A friend and I are both having the exact same problem (he on a Mac, me on a PC):
Scanned black and white images, saved as PSD, look significantly different in Lightroom and Photoshop. Note the attached screenshots showing the LR images as darker. When printed, the images are still different. So this clearly has nothing to do with monitor calibration. And profiles are the same.

Do you have PS Color Profile Mismatch Warnings enabled. Here's what I use:
When opening a file in PS that uses a different color profile than my working space the following will appear:
Under 'What would you like to do' select the above setting to see the image as it appears inside LR. If the problem persists it would help if you can post an image with the problem to a file sharing site such as Dropbox. We can then check it on our own systems. Upload any image that exhibits the issue.

Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box. But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different. The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for. Here is a link to a pic.

Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked. I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
I wouldn't expect anything less from them. It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out. If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box. The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

Prints and SoftProofs from Aperture and PS look different?

I'm using the HP Designjet 90 and there is something strange.
There is significant difference between soft-proof in Aperture and PS of the same image (exported as .psd from Aperture). In Aperture the image has some blue/cyan cast and there is no such a problem in PS Softproof.
Prints are consistent with softproofs - from Aperture it looks blueish and more warm from PS.
Why there is such a difference?

... and I'm applying the same profile in both applications

HT4972 I can't find my music on my iphone since I upgraded to IOS - how do I find it and everything looks different on it?

I upgraded last night to IOS - not sure what version and now I can't find my music or some of my apps that I had on my Iphone?
Do I need to do something else?
Helen

Why we can't upgrade my iOs 7

Site layout and color looks different in each browser

I created a site. When I preview the site in firefox it is just the way I created it in dreamweaver cs5, but when I preview it in IE the background color is not the pinkish color I used, it is black and the subheading is crunched up to the left and not the right. Also, in google crome browser, it is perfect except there is a huge gap of space from the bottom of the page to the footer (It shouldn't have margins but the margin is very large). The site is for a client (escort-personal), I hope that someone will be able to help/lead in the right direction.

I see a black background in IE, no doubt caused by truncated #hex color codes in the markup. Remove the table cell BGColors from your html markup.
Add this to your CSS code:
td {background: #993300}
FYI, table-based layouts are very old school. You should be learning to work with CSS Layouts.
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/dreamweaver/articles/table_to_css_pt1.html
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
http://alt-web.com/
http://twitter.com/altweb

Deploy problem - CSS and overall look different on development machine

Hi.
My ADF app looks nice on my development machine. However, when I deploy it to weblogic server, CSS or something seems to be missing (for example, I lost nice textfield look)
Did I forget to turn on some deployment setting?
BR
Edited by: user509804 on 22.4.2011 12:54

chk for all the files...it seems u hv missed out on some css

Footage Looks Different in SpeedGrade and when rendered

Hello
I’m having some problems figuring out what my file actually look like.
Is there still a QuickTime bug that cause QuickTime to show a gamma-shifted or otherwise-screwy image?
5dMkII h.264 .mov file
The same file in QuickTime and VLC looks different. VLC version is darker and redder.
That file in SG looks even darker, and slightly redder.
Rendered out from SpeedGrade to ProRes422 (Automatic Color Adjustment switch on in SG) looks close to SpeedGrade display, but a few points redder and a touch darker.
Rendered out from SpeedGrade to ProRes422 (Automatic Color Adjustment switch off in SG) much lighter and paler than SpeedGrade display.
Same results with ProRes444.
Why do these look different?
Latest MacPro Tower
Latest OS X
64GB RAM
AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB
2x LaCie 321 monitors, calibrated with Spyder3 Elite
QuickTime Pro 7 or QuickTime Player bundled with OS
All files viewed on the same monitor
Thanks in advance for any help.

In general, it depends.
You can't be responsible for every other computer & user in the world ... even though at times they'll try and make you so. The best anyone can do is run a calibrated "shop" and know you're delivering good technical content. Test it on other calibrated systems, and over broadcast monitors if such are available somewhere you know. For clients with specific needs, TEST. Send a test over and have them check it ... for most TV use this is crucial. For say adds on movie theatre screens between shows, arrange to take a sample over before they "open" for the day and have it played on their equipment onto the screen ... see what it looks like, adjust & retest as necessary.
For web use ... that's a total crapshoot off the mark.Best you can do is again, see that your system is as accurately calibrated as you can. Set the preferences for video players on your machine to use your system's calibration rather than their internal, which will ALWAYS do something odd to the signals. But not only odd ... unpredictable computer to computer. If your system is fully calibrated, your work over the web will hopefully average out pretty decent.
For web-delivery clients, still ... do initial testing to see that they are happy with the results you give them. If on their computer they want it bluer, and ... you know that means it's gonna really be BLUE on many machines ... perhaps showing them on a laptop that it does look good as-is on another system or some sort of client education moment may need to happen. I've heard plenty of complaints that the client demanded someone deliver something too dark ... and then complained back at them because they got comments from others that the material was too dark. Love that, eh? Client demanded they change it darker even though told it would be too dark for most computers ... then groused at them that it was too dark. Right. Oh frabjous joy.
Over in the video lounge here and on a couple other sites ... the threads on Stupid Client Demands have at times been a riot and at times something to near cry over. As a 30+ year stills portrait photographer, we've had the same thing at times from clients ... a demand to just plain print their images GREEN or something. Most of which we've complied with, some we ... didn't. What an interesting variety of brains and eyes there are about the planet ...
My experience is that just doing the best I can, it looks pretty darn good on my client's tv's and computers. Some go one way or the other a bit, but in general, it works fine. And check if you've got a setting in either system controls or the Qt & VLC controls for system-managed color.
Neil

Published site looks different on mac and pc?

having (finally) published my site, why do the fonts and layout look different on my mac to my husbnad's pc? v odd???

because different browsers interpret CSS files indifferent ways and because fonts that are installed on your mac may not necessarily be installed on your husbands pc. It is a common gripe of web designers (not just those using iWeb) that margins and padding (for example) are all read differently by IE than by FF.

Image looks different in Photoshop and Lightroom

I started a forum on flickr and I have some issues with my images. I have calibrated monitor but my images look off online even though I saved them as sRGB. Now my image looks one way in PS and then when I finish editing it and save it, I import it into lightroom and it looks different.
Same image, but it looks different.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/photoshopsupport/discuss/72157626443796391/#comment7215762645 5942911

The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail. The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS. The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa. The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop. Not sure about the drivers.

Pantone Bridge and Solid looks different on screen

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for