Part II updation

Hi Friends..
i have released the blocked invoice, but part II register is not been updated, kindly help...
thanks in advance

Hello
No register updation happens at the time of miro.
If you want you can configure your excise group to capture and post excise invoice at time of MIGO.
In the two-step procedure, the excise clerk captures the incoming excise invoice. This means that the clerk enters the data, but the system does not yet create an entry in Part II of the appropriate excise register. Another user (the excise supervisor) checks the excise invoice and posts it. The system then creates a Part II entry.
capture excise J1IEX_C
post: J1IEX_P
In the one-step procedure, the excise clerk captures and posts the incoming excise invoice simultaneously. The system creates the Part II entry automatically. For that you have to configure the capture and post Excise invoice at MIGO for your excise group in SPRO.
Excise register updation has nothing to do with MIRO or invoice verification.
Regards

Similar Messages

Excise Part 1 updation at the time of issue.

Hi,
I am having one requirement regarding RG23 A part 1 updation at the time of issue.
1) How the register part 1 updated at the time of goods issue.
2) I purchased one material from two different vendor. One is excise unit & other is non excise.
At the time of goods issue to shop floor how the system determine that this issue is from excisable material or non excisable material.And accrdingly how will update part 1 entries.
Every time i will go to J1I5 transaction for updation of RG23 A or it will update automatically.
Regards,
Dinesh

Hi Sathish ,
In CIN - basic settings - Maintain excise groups there in that outgoing excise invoice Excise invoice during the billing and Create and post inv in single make the both fields un mark.
Hope this will make you to create invoice and excise invoice separately, or els find if any exit is used earlier.
Check and revert
Regards
Ram

Virtual chars does not take part in update rules

Hi
Friends my question is Virtual Chars Does not take part in update rules than why to include it in data target??? directly we can include it at query designer .
Thanks
Asim

Hi,
Adding a charachteristics is to have a place holder in your data target. In virtual char you make use of this field memory pointer to populate the data for this field.
Hope this helps for you.
Thanks,
Arun

How to access basic cube data as part of update rule routine?

Dear colleagues:
I am developing a routine as part of the update rule to define a characteristic value to feed an infocube. However, I need to peek up a data that is available on another infoprovider, in this case a basic cube.
So far, I have done that by peeking up data form ODS as part of the update routine, but this is the first time I need to peek up a data from a basic cube.
<b>Does that works the same way as ODS?</b>
Best regards
Waldemar

Hi Krzysztof Konitz:
I have posted an inquire about getting that from the PSA. By mistake I have posted that once before your reply and another after that. Then I red you reply.
However, you replay solved the problem.
Best regards
Waldemar

Bridge 5 operational bug Part 2 UPDATED

This is a follow-up to the note on and may clarify some of the operational observations seen in::
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/794019?tstart=0
Bridge 5 is duplicating directories of thumbs and previews. Here is a small partial list of duplicated directories:
Volume in drive H is BridgeCache
Volume Serial Number is F03E-BFBE
Directory of H:\Bridge5Cache0900\1024
2011-02-03 19:33    <DIR>          0001-020D4F6EE74
2011-02-07 02:03    <DIR>          0001-020F29A3CA8
2011-02-03 19:39    <DIR>          0201-0309711833E
2011-01-28 02:46    <DIR>          0201-030B17D51E2
2011-02-03 19:40    <DIR>          0301-0405EF49525
2011-01-28 03:15    <DIR>          0301-040789847F9
2011-02-03 19:40    <DIR>          0401-05055F3F60B
2011-01-28 04:08    <DIR>          0401-050739F24D7
2011-02-07 21:18    <DIR>          0501-0609B1F48CC
2011-01-28 01:33    <DIR>          0501-060BD739A10
2011-02-26 23:06    <DIR>          aura8E42DD55
2011-01-23 12:49    <DIR>          auraCB12C2D2
2011-02-03 18:34    <DIR>          auraEdwoABC9C675
2011-01-23 04:16    <DIR>          auraEdwoFF3C795F
2011-02-26 23:29    <DIR>          BluesAtJA837BAA1
2011-01-21 15:42    <DIR>          BluesAtJFCC2058B
2011-01-21 16:44    <DIR>          danceatn520465E7
2011-02-19 00:53    <DIR>          danceatn79EC6611
2011-02-26 23:37    <DIR>          madi2066804A
2011-02-11 21:51    <DIR>          madi65369FCD
             795 Dir(s) 317,227,864,064 bytes free
Many more examples can be provided.
Each pair of directories contain identical 1024 preview images. In all cases, the only difference in directory names is the hash code appended to the "primary part" of the directory name. (In the above, the numeric directory names are of the form nnnn-nnnn)
The initial rebuild of the cache was massivly constructed during January 2011. The more recent directories were constructed when the directories were recently accessed.   Please refer to the above mentioned thread for more details. This data duplication "explains" some of the operational observations in that thread. Unfortunately, I did not notice this at that time.
The directory duplication shows that Bridge 5 is rebuilding thumbs/previews in a new directory even though it has rebuilt the complete cach "very recently" - in particular, the "madi" directory..
If I were to interpret this, it seems to me that Bridge computes the hash part of the name in different ways and therefor causes a data duplication and it's associated heavy resource overload when it is least expected.
I don't know if this manifestation is work-flow dependent: I have work-in-progress directories on my workstation and have a master cache associated with these directories. In all cases, the cache system is built with the export option to generate .BridgCache files. At various times, I copy the work-in-progress directories to my networked storage system. Subsequently, using an appropriate "archival" master cache, I build the cache for the new directories. I assume that the initial seed of thumbs/previews is copied from the .BridgeCache files. The above directory samples are from the "appropriate master cache".
UPDATE TEST
I did a test that just might be reproduceable
1. A test directory on the worstation hard drives was created with three image sub-directories using a master cache directory on the workstation. The caches were build and .BridgeCache files exported. All viewing was perfectly fine.
2. The test directory was copied to a network archive drive.
3. The workstation master cache was deleted and a new master cache created. A single small directory was added to visually acertain that the cache was properly functioning.
4. Using the windows "drag and drop" feature, the test directory on the networked archive drive was dropped onto the Bridge 5 desk top icon. Bridge started immediately with the three sub-directories properly displayed in the "content" panel.
5. The bridge "tools/cache/Build and Export Cache was selected to 'Build Cache For Folder "9999-today" and All Enclosed Folders". The "Export Cache To Folders" was unchecked (since there are already .BridgeCache files in each directory and they are the basis for seeding the master cache). The cache was constructed with the following results in the 1024 directory:
2011-02-27 21:04    <DIR>          20110219BED18138
2011-02-27 21:03    <DIR>          20110224EB4DAE46
2011-02-27 21:02    <DIR>          barasmal0B44C410
2011-02-27 20:57    <DIR>          empty1E10B2FB
6. Clicking on each directory resulted in immediately visible thumbs with no rebuild.
7. Each directory was open by an external process with a using ShellExecute() that has the bridge programme and image file reference, for example
C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Bridge CS5\Bridge.exe \\P2\Volume_1\ImageArchive\9999-today\barasmall\tf603683.cr2
Two such directories were so opened. Those directoies has duplicated master cache entries.
8. The computer was shut down and restarted. Bridge was restarted alone (not by another process). The third directory was open and immediately the cache was rebuilt and a duplicate entry resulted.
9. The final content of the 1024 directory in all accessed directorys being duplicated:
Volume in drive D is extra
Volume Serial Number is 6CEE-8402
Directory of D:\Bridge5Cache\1024
2011-02-27 21:23    <DIR>          .
2011-02-27 21:23    <DIR>          ..
2011-02-27 21:04    <DIR>          20110219BED18138
2011-02-27 21:11    <DIR>          20110219FB819EBF
2011-02-27 21:23    <DIR>          20110224AE1DB1C1
2011-02-27 21:03    <DIR>          20110224EB4DAE46
2011-02-27 21:02    <DIR>          barasmal0B44C410
2011-02-27 21:09    <DIR>          barasmal78DD828C
2011-02-27 20:57    <DIR>          empty1E10B2FB
               0 File(s)              0 bytes
               9 Dir(s) 313,629,155,328 bytes free
This seems rather strange - even though Bridgie created a set of .BridgeCache directories "within the last hour", simply moving the image directories to a new location for archival purposes (and building the master cache) causes Bridge to reconstruct the master caches a second time. It does not even have the courtesy of removing the now-obsolete thumbs/previews although it does seem to update the modified time of the .BridgeCache files in the image directoies.
When the "Compact Cache" option is used, only two of the three duplicated directories were removed - a third remained with all images duplicated.
IMHO, this is defeats a significant reason for creating the .BridgeCache files in the image folders. There is a resource overhead of creating the .BridgeCache files in the first place. Then, when those files are needed, the image previews and thumbs are copied from the .Bridgecache to the master and effectively ignored when Bridge 5 completely rebuilds the cache anyway. I now have a master cache that took weeks of 24 hr per day processing to construct and it is now corrupted with duplicate and useless data - inpinging upon the 500,000 file "limit" for the Bridge master cache. It also is causing a major time waste while waiting for the rebuild when I need to browse many directories for a number of books I will be publishing over the next year.
Thank you
tony

It really would be nice if Adobe could provide a "fixit tool" that would update the cache structure to flag the various constructed cache directories as current and up to date in such a way that a rebuild and data duplication would not be done. This would go a long way to making cache rebuilds from the .BridgeCache files a useful tool.
P.S. This file processing problem did not happen when CS5 was released and I migrated from Bridge CS4 to CS5. Hopefully a fix can be provided.

SharePoint 2013 RSS Viewer not loading when other Custom web part using Update Panel or Ajax Timer control

Hi,
SharePoint 2013 RSS
Viewer web part failing to complete loading when the page loads.
This happens when having RSS Viewer and then adding a Custom webpart with an updatepanel and timer control.
I had used Ajax update panel and timer control to load the web part asynchronously after the main page is fully loaded.
The RSS-Viewer web part hangs in loading state while the custom webpart loads just fine.
The issue occurs when an like button click or Timer Tick event fires after the page
is loaded.
Haven't been able to track the issue.
Couple of workaround I tried to call a server side button click event from the custom web part after the page gets fully loaded using JQuery shown below did not work out either.
$(document).ready(function () {
$('#<%= netButton2.ClientID %>').click();
And
document.onreadystatechange = function () {
if (document.readyState == "complete") {
$('#<%= netButton2.ClientID %>').click();
Please let me know how to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Franklin

Hi Johan,
The assignment of this user on the given task might be corrupted. Try to remove the resource from the task, publish the project, assign the resource again and publish again the project. If it is not working, try to unpublish the task (column "publish")
and publih it again.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

Error in RG23A Part 2 Update in Vendor Return

Hi,
This is a scenario of Vendor Return and we have configured Immediate Utilization of CENVAT.
After creating return delivery (Mvt Type 122), when Excise Invoice is created (created and posted in a single step) in J1IS, the RG23A Part1 is updated correctly but in RG23A Part 2 only BED value is updated whereas ECS and AT1 should have been updated too but not getting updated. In Excise Invoice ECS (ECess) and AT1 (SECess) values are missing.
Can anyone provide some idea to resolve this?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
Spro>Logistics u2013 General>Tax on Goods Movements>India>Business Transactions>Specify Which Movement Types Involve Excise Invoicesu2014here check for movt type 122 which register is maintained once appropriate register is maintained there then system will update the same.
Or even you can try J1I5 update register with movt type 122 & enter material document (return delivery material document no) & classification IPD (Issued for clearance/Removal on payment of duty) & select the correct radio button of register. Once update the register then Extract data for excise registers Using J2I5.
It will update both the data in the register
Rgs

RG23A Part 1 updation for 261 movement type

Hi,
We have a business scenario where the same raw materials are procured from both excisable and non-excisable vendors. When purchasing from excisable vendors, CENVAT credit is availed and RG23A Part 1 and RG23A Part 2 entries are updated. When purchasing from non-excisable sources at the time of goods receipt in MIGO 'No Excise Entry' option is chosen.
When subsequently materials are issued to production order using movement type 261, we try to consume this inventory from RG23A part 1 using transaction J1I5. However we come across cases where the material document qty is more than the balance qty in Rg23A part 1. This is because part of the inventory comes from non-excisable purchase.
In this case how do we update RG23A Part 1 for the partial CENVATABLE inventory?
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Ashok/Binoy,
Thanks to both of you for your answers. We are unfortunately not able to maintain multiple materials as the number of raw materials are very high and also maintaining bill of materials with multiple BOM's was considered not practical by the client. I then discussed the situation with the client's excise department with what Binoy had indicated. We have decided to make a "Part 1 entry only" during MIGO. The excise person indicated that this would be ok.
Thanks again for taking time to reply.
Regards,
Sridhar

Part II Updation in Excise Invoice Cancellation

Hi All ,
I have cancelled on excise invoice using T-Code J1IH . on cancelletion Part2 has been successfully created.
now i want to know weather this part II entry of excise cancellation will appear in RG1 or not ? if yes how to process and if no why ? pl. help

HI
As far as i know there is no part 1 or part 2 for RG1 register.
regards
Prashanth

Running Forte via a network file share (Part 1) - update 2...

Update 2
Running Forte Runtime via file share without having to
install Forte on any
PC ...
I just want to run deployed forte applications on SOE PCs.
[snip]
(something to the effect of: installed forte runtime on PC1 locating
forte_root on a file share, run an application OK)
[snip]
Now I export the registry keys from the current user hive.
Log off and find another SOE PC. (node PC2 say)
Log on and import the reg file - done.
Now fire up the same run command
q:\forte_rt\install\bin\ftexec -fi
bt:q:\forte\my_forte\dev\myapp\my_app0**** WRONG: I used ftcmd - and got the error cannot create btree noderepo on
NFS type disk.
**** I tried it again with ftexec (as I should) and - IT WORKED!
Now to test simultaneous access via a number of PCs...
/dirk
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Update 2
Running Forte Runtime via file share without having to
install Forte on any
PC ...
I just want to run deployed forte applications on SOE PCs.
[snip]
(something to the effect of: installed forte runtime on PC1 locating
forte_root on a file share, run an application OK)
[snip]
Now I export the registry keys from the current user hive.
Log off and find another SOE PC. (node PC2 say)
Log on and import the reg file - done.
Now fire up the same run command
q:\forte_rt\install\bin\ftexec -fi
bt:q:\forte\my_forte\dev\myapp\my_app0**** WRONG: I used ftcmd - and got the error cannot create btree noderepo on
NFS type disk.
**** I tried it again with ftexec (as I should) and - IT WORKED!
Now to test simultaneous access via a number of PCs...
/dirk
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Return Delivery and Subsequent Delivery part 2 updating

Hi Experts
I made GR for PO by capturing Excises as it is defective I have returned the stock to vendor in MIGO using Return Delivery against Material Document number, at this stage part 2 is deducing the G/L account of BED, ECS and SHCess and adding with G/L account of CENVAT Suspense account. Fine it is as I expected.
But the problem is, when I making subsequent delivery for the item instead of deducing with G/L account of CENVAT Suspense account and adding the G/L account of BED, ECS and SHCess IT IS DOING REVERSELY THAT IS AGAIN IT IS deducing the G/L account of BED, ECS and SHCess and adding with G/L account of CENVAT Suspense account.
Kindly where I've make the changes for it to capture correctly.
Regards
K.R.Srinivasan

not yet answered

2 part question: updating iphone & ringtones

I feel technologically challenged and just plain helpless!
I have been trying to load and install the update all day long. I get as far as downloading it (which has happened twice) but doesn't install even though I've checked off to install immediately after downloading. What am I doing wrong? I can't install, synch, anything!
Also, I downloaded at least a half a dozen songs from itunes that showed a bell (read: ringtone) and now that they are in my library, they don't show up with the bell (read: not compatible to be a ringtone) and yet I go look for the song on itunes and the bell is there. Can we say what the...?
I am hoping that someone, anyone can point me in the right direction. Thanks so much in advance:)

On important updates, I always set to "download only" and wait to install until I know I have the full update on the computer. If the download stalls in the middle of the update, you can be lost. Make sure that you have downloaded the full update, then close and reopen iTunes and let it install when it tells you that it has the update for you. I disconnected the iPhone while the computer was downloading the 153 MB of firmware and software update and then reconnected after the download was complete.
When the warning was given on the phone with the yellow caution sign to connect to iTunes, I was already connected to the computer and iTunes and I simply waited it out and followed all of the install instructions. This is a firmware update and it takes longer than a simple os update.
My update went well and most is fine except for new changes that I discover while using the iPhone. They no longer detail the changes for us and it can be surprising to find some of the changes.
Message was edited by: Rhyd
I am afraid I have no info on the ringtones, sorry. I am using the defaults on the iPhone.
Message was edited by: Rhyd

RG 23 Part 2 updation

Dear all,
At the time of return delivery to the vendor,stock transfer etc...,
How system updates the RG23 PART1 and PART2,entries in the registers
Please suggest the entire scenario to be followed

>
GB BL wrote:
> Dear all,
> At the time of return delivery to the vendor,stock transfer etc...,
> How system updates the RG23 PART1 and PART2,entries in the registers
> Please suggest the entire scenario to be followed
During return delivery / stock transfer, a part2 entry (register type D - dispatch) is made. You can check the entry in table J_1IPART2.
Part1 register will get updated when you run J1I5 with the relevant details.
Regards,
Aroop

Part of update was enabling Global Services - any disadvantage to this?

Looking at the features list, it seems like the default with enabled global services is that you can make calls elsewhere with a per unit of usage charge. The cost without using it is listed as $0.00. Is there any disadvantage to having this enabled on the phone in terms of hidden costs, or performance hits?
Thx / Tom

While in the USA, you probably won't run into any problems in global mode, but it won't make any difference performance wise either, so you may want to just leave it in CDMA/LTE mode. While traveling, if you can a local prepaid SIM, that would probably be cheaper while in global mode.

RG23A PARTI & PARTII register & tab is not updating in MIGO by 103 105 mvt

Hi Experts,
I am doing MIGO by 103 & 105 movements. My problem is RG23A PARTI & PARTII register is not updating & also in Detail DATA (below the header details tab) Excise ITEM tab is also not coming.
I have done the configuration like LOG GEN->Tax on Goods Movements ->under business transcations->Incoming excise details->specify movement types involve in excise invoices.
Actually, after doing MIGO PARTI is updated in table J_1IPART1 but no values updated for J_1IPART2.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks
Trupti

Hello
as per you part1 values updationg while doing the time of migo and part2 values not updating while doing the j1iex post .
your not getting the excise tab on details so check the tax code mentioned in po assigned the co code or not ?
if your using the TAXINN procedure check the condition records in fv12.
check the j1id settings for material and vendor.
Regards
Laxman

Part II updation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for