Patch 3480000 install - Failed worker   ALTER SEQUENCE

Dear All,
I am in the process of installing Patch 3480000 (11.5.10.2) and during the running workers 1,3 fail and this the part of worker 1 log :
The sequence IEM_ACCOUNT_TAG_KEYS_S1 in the database is defined as:
MINVALUE = 1 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1
CYCLE = NO ORDER = NO CACHE = 20
which should be defined as:
MINVALUE = 10000 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1
CYCLE = NO ORDER = NO CACHE = 20
Alter the sequence with :
Start time for statement below is: Fri Apr 29 2011 14:51:14
ALTER SEQUENCE IEM.IEM_ACCOUNT_TAG_KEYS_S1 MINVALUE 10000
AD Worker error:
The following ORACLE error:
ORA-04007: MINVALUE cannot be made to exceed the current value
occurred while executing the SQL statement:
ALTER SEQUENCE IEM.IEM_ACCOUNT_TAG_KEYS_S1 MINVALUE 10000
AD Worker error:
Unable to compare or correct sequences
*     because of the error above*
Thanks&BR
Tarek

Hussein
_ this  I did:_*
**SQL> select IEM.IEM_TAG_KEYS_S1 .nextval from dual;**
**NEXTVAL**
**10001**
**SQL> alter sequence IEM.IEM_TAG_KEYS_S1 increment by 1000;**
**Sequence altered.**
**SQL>**
and this part from screen out put:_+
**ATTENTION: All workers either have failed or are waiting:**
**FAILED: file iemsvrp.odf on worker 1.**
**ATTENTION: Please fix the above failed worker(s) so the manager can continue.**
**Fixed: file iemsvrp.odf on worker 1 for product iem username IEM.**
**Restarted: file iemsvrp.odf on worker 1 for product iem username IEM.**
**FAILED: file iemsvrp.odf on worker 1 for product iem username IEM.**
**ATTENTION: All workers either have failed or are waiting:**
**FAILED: file iemsvrp.odf on worker 1.**
**ATTENTION: Please fix the above failed worker(s) so the manager can continue.**
and this from log file:+_
**The sequence IEM_ENCRYPTED_TAG_DTLS_S1 in the database is defined as:**
**MINVALUE = 1 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1**
**CYCLE = NO ORDER = NO CACHE = 20**
**which should be defined as:**
**MINVALUE = 10000 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1**
**CYCLE = NO ORDER = NO CACHE = 20**
**Alter the sequence with :**
**Start time for statement below is: Fri Apr 29 2011 17:10:15**
**ALTER SEQUENCE IEM.IEM_ENCRYPTED_TAG_DTLS_S1 MINVALUE 10000**
**AD Worker error:**
**The following ORACLE error:**
**ORA-04007: MINVALUE cannot be made to exceed the current value**
**occurred while executing the SQL statement:**
**ALTER SEQUENCE IEM.IEM_ENCRYPTED_TAG_DTLS_S1 MINVALUE 10000**
**AD Worker error:**
**Unable to compare or correct sequences**
**     because of the error above**
Thanks hussein
please advise
Tarek
Edited by: user11973469 on Apr 29, 2011 5:17 PM
Edited by: user11973469 on Apr 29, 2011 5:18 PM

Similar Messages

  • Patch 3480000 install - Failed worker because of GL locking

    I am in the process of installing Patch 3480000 (11.5.10.2) and during the running workers fail on sql scripts under the GL schema. Checking the log they are failing because the account is locked(timed), however if I unlock it and run again it locks the account again.
    All the other ones have been running as they should (I have had to reset a couple from EXPIRED(GRACE) to proceed however). Is the password saved incorrectly somewhere? If I change it does that hose things up for everything else or is there something else I can check for this?
    (glxlatxd.sql & glqtposd.sql are the two failing if it matters)
    Thanks
    Edited by: Toolman21 on Jan 22, 2010 3:30 PM

    If I drop the sequence and create it again with the higher values as they are trying to alter it to, I assume that would fix it however I also assume that it would mess up some number or something somewhere in the program which is of course bad.
    I have continued to search metalink and the internet and can not find anything relating to oracle patches and that error or that error and oracle app sever in general.
    I have logged an SR with Oracle but any advice that you (or anyone) have would be appreciated.
    This is the more complete error text
    The sequence PV_SEARCH_ATTR_VALUES_S in the database is defined as:
    MINVALUE = 1 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1
    CYCLE = NO ORDER = NO CACHE = 20
    which should be defined as:
    MINVALUE = 10000 MAXVALUE = 2000000000 INCREMENT BY = 1
    CYCLE = YES ORDER = NO CACHE = 1000
    +(Note: The cache value for sequence PV_SEARCH_ATTR_VALUES_S is 100000 in the ODF file. The value 1000 is being used instead because this provides better performance when selecting from the sequence.)+
    Alter the sequence with :
    Start time for statement below is: Mon Jan 25 2010 14:47:32
    ALTER SEQUENCE PV.PV_SEARCH_ATTR_VALUES_S MINVALUE 10000 CYCLE CACHE 1000
    AD Worker error:
    The following ORACLE error:
    ORA-04007: MINVALUE cannot be made to exceed the current value
    occurred while executing the SQL statement:
    ALTER SEQUENCE PV.PV_SEARCH_ATTR_VALUES_S MINVALUE 10000 CYCLE CACHE 1000
    AD Worker error:
    Unable to compare or correct sequences
    +     because of the error above+
    Time when worker failed: Mon Jan 25 2010 14:47:32
    Thanks again
    Edited by: Toolman21 on Jan 25, 2010 2:23 PM

  • Patch 3480000 install - Failed worker  FndXdfCmp  Index *  doees not exist

    Dear All
    I am in the process of installing Patch 3480000 (11.5.10.2) and during the running workers 1 failed with "FndXdfCmp"
    the full command is_
    adjava -mx256m -Xrs -nojit oracle.apps.fnd.odf2.FndXdfCmp &un_apps &pw_apps &un_apps &pw_apps &jdbc_protocol &jdbc_db_addr table &fullpath_okc_patch/115/xdf_TEMP_15049
    80.xdf &fullpath_fnd_patch/115/xdf_xsl index_category=large parallel_index_threshold=20000
    and the error is_
    Table Name is TEMP_1504980
    Table exists in the target database
    Checking for differences
    Number of columns for the table in the xml file is 3
    The table in the Xml file and in the target database match
    Index hashcode(s) extracted from the XDF.
    Hashcodes generated for DB indexes.
    Index TEMP_1504980_N1 does not exist in APPS. <---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Skipping the creation of index TEMP_1504980_N1 in current mode.
    Thanks&BR
    Tarek

    Please see the suggested solutions in these docs.
    Errors on FndXdfCmp.class : "ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel" and "FND-UT-CMT: ORA-01041: internal error. hostdef extension doesn't exist" [ID 577534.1]
    Unable To Create The Primary Key Constraint [ID 828990.1]
    ICX_TRANSACTIONS.xdf Failed to Create Index ICX_TRANSACTIONS_U1 While Applying Patch 6435000 [ID 1081195.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Patch 3480000 install hangs

    Dear All
    I am in the process of installing Patch 3480000 (11.5.10.2) and now all workers displayed in "Running" status with command "adctrl" but Windows task manager doesn't display any activity running so now all patch is hanging
    and the screen output for the patch is:
    Writing dependencies of jobs to run to appldep.txt file...
    There are now 95392 jobs remaining (current phase=A0):
    0 running, 139 ready to run and 95253 waiting.
    Reading completed jobs from restart file (if any).
    There are now 49650 jobs remaining (current phase=A55):
    0 running, 5686 ready to run and 43964 waiting.
    FYI the job which should be run now is "adtasktim.sql"
    Please advise how I can do

    Thanks
    After two shutdown ans start for application,database and Windows then patch running
    BR
    Tarek

  • Work failed while applying the patch 3480000

    Dear All,
    Please Help
    At the phase of applying the patch 3480000 while upgrading from 11.58 to 11.5.10.2
    workers failed:
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 5 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    Time is: Tue Apr 05 2011 06:30:13
    ATTENTION: All workers either have failed or are waiting:
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 1.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 2.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 3.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 4.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 5.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 6.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 7.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 8.
    ATTENTION: Please fix the above failed worker(s) so the manager can continue.

    Hi Hussein,
    Sorry for being late
    next is output screen for patch 3480000
    There are now 39641 jobs remaining (current phase=A84):
    6 running, 216 ready to run and 39419 waiting.
    Assigned: file WFXLoad.class on worker 7 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    Assigned: file WFXLoad.class on worker 8 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 4 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 1 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 3 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 6 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 8 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 2 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 7 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 5 for product fnd username APPLSYS.
    ATTENTION: All workers either have failed or are waiting:
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 1.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 2.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 3.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 4.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 5.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 6.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 7.
    FAILED: file WFXLoad.class on worker 8.
    ATTENTION: Please fix the above failed worker(s) so the manager can continue.
    next is last lines in adworker log file
    adjava -mx256m -nojit oracle.apps.fnd.wf.WFXLoad -u &un_apps &pw_apps &jdbc_db_addr &jdbc_protocol US &fullpath_cln_patch/115/xml/US_cln2a12os.wfx
    Error:
    Program exited with status 1
    Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 1.
    Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.
    Copyright (c) 2002 Oracle Corporation
    Redwood Shores, California, USA
    AD Java
    Version 11.5.0
    NOTE: You may not use this utility for custom development
    unless you have written permission from Oracle Corporation.
    Reading product information from file...
    Reading language and territory information from file...
    Reading language information from applUS.txt ...
    Temporarily resetting CLASSPATH to:
    "h:\oracle\prodappl\ad\11.5.0\java\adjri.zip;H:\oracle\prodcomn\util\java\1.3\jdk1.3.1_07\lib\rt.jar;H:\oracle\prodcomn\util\java\1.3\jdk1.3.1_07\lib\i18n.jar;h:\oracle\prodcomn\java\appsborg.zip;h:\oracle\prodora\8.0.6\forms60\java;h:\oracle\prodcomn\java"
    Calling h:\oracle\prodora\8.0.6\jdk\bin\java.exe ...
    Oracle Workflow XML Loader 2.6.2
    Connecting to APPS@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=NT4SERVER)(PORT=1521))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=PROD))) -- UTF8
    Connected to (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=NT4SERVER)(PORT=1521))(CONNECT_DATA=(SID=PROD)))
    SQL Exception encountered during upload: ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
    PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'UPLOADOBJECT'
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
    PL/SQL: Statement ignored
    Fatal error encountered during upload between line 10 and 35
    Error encountered when upload.
    AD Run Java Command is complete.
    AD Worker error:
    The above program failed. See the error messages listed
    above, if any, or see the log and output files for the program.
    Time when worker failed: Tue Apr 05 2011 06:30:13
    Thanks&BR
    Tarek

  • Worker failed with patch 3480000

    Dear All,
    Please worker failed during patch 3480000 as following:
    H:\oracle\prodappl\fnd\11.5.0\bin\CONCSUB.exe &ui_apps SYSADMIN 'System Administrator' SYSADMIN CONCURRENT FND FNDGSCST ALL 10
    Error:
    Program exited with status 3
    Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 3.
    Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.Please enter a valid responsibility. The responsibility System Administrator does not exist or is not active. Check that the correct application short name is specified for your responsibility.
    Please advise
    Tarek

    Hussein,
    Following is part of worker log file:
    Time when worker completed job: Fri May 20 2011 09:50:06
    Evaluating symbolic arguments ....
    Done evaluating symbolic arguments.
    Time when worker started job: Fri May 20 2011 09:50:06
    Start time for file is: Fri May 20 2011 09:50:06
    H:\oracle\prodappl\fnd\11.5.0\bin\CONCSUB.exe &ui_apps SYSADMIN 'System Administrator' SYSADMIN CONCURRENT FND FNDGSCST ALL 10
    Error:
    Program exited with status 3
    Cause: The program terminated, returning status code 3.
    Action: Check your installation manual for the meaning of this code on this operating system.Please enter a valid responsibility. The responsibility System Administrator does not exist or is not active. Check that the correct application short name is specified for your responsibility.
    AD Worker error:
    The above program failed with error code 3.
    See the AD Worker log file and/or the program log file for details
    Thanks,
    Tarek

  • ACR 8.4 CC RC install fails with AAM message 'patch not applicable'

    ACR 8.4 CC RC install fails with AAM message 'patch not applicable' - Running Photoshop CC on OSX 10.7.5
    Anyone seen this or have any ideas for a fix?
    I also have my legacy CS6 installed on the same Mac - tried installing ACR 8.4 CS6 RC and that fails with the same dialogue box from AAM
    The DNG converter installs no issue.
    Thx
    Chris.

    Do you have some other software, like Photoshop Elements 12 on your system that would generally also be compatible with ACR 8.4 final but isn’t compatible with the RC because the RC’s only for PS users? 
    I installed the RC the same day it was released on my computer that has PS-CS6 & PS-CC with Windows 7 and it worked ok, so the update generally works, but something isn’t on your systems.
    Are you up-to-date with your PS-CC version, which seems to be 14.2.1:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2014/02/photoshop-cc-14-1-1-update-now-available.html
    And is CS6 updated to 13.0.6?
    http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=39 <http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=39&platform=Macintosh> &platform=Macintosh

  • Coldfusion services stop working when windows 2000 hotfix patches are installed on the windows 2000 operating system

    The following windows 2000 hotfix patches were installed on
    windows 2000 operating system -
    KB917537
    KB917159
    KB914388
    Coldfusion service stopped working and wouldn't restart
    later...When I uninstalled the patches. I got back coldfusion. Do I
    have to make changes in the settings of coldfusion administrator
    for having hotfix patches?

    Princess MX wrote:
    > Please see the attached in response.
    All of these are old and show CF working just fine. Do you
    have any
    errors from the time CF stopped working? Is there anything in
    the event
    viewer? When you say "stop working", do you mean fails to
    start, throws
    errors, silently fails? How have you configured CF?
    Multiserver? Single
    server? Does CF still work through the built-in webserver?
    Can you start
    CF from the command line jrun?
    Jochem
    Jochem van Dieten
    Adobe Community Expert for ColdFusion

  • I get an "install failed" message. "Recovery system can't be created-click restart to return to previous version of OS X." This doesn't work. My Mac continues to try to install Mountain Lion. What is the elegant way to get my system back?

    I get an "install failed" message. "Recovery system can't be created—click restart to return to previous version of OS X." This doesn't work. My Mac continues to try to install Mountain Lion. What is the elegant way to get my system back?

    The first time I attempted to install ML was on a late 2011 MBP.  It ran for three minutes then gave me the error message: Could not install OSX due to an unexpected error.  I was using the original ML install app, not a USB or other drive.  
    After a couple of restarts wiht the same result I saw a message to the effect that the install was trying to close open apps.  I closed apps  manually a few times to no avail.  I shut down instead of restarting then booted into Safe mode (hold down the shift key when starting) and that did it.  The install went smoothly after that. 
    I since installed ML in two iMacs using a cloned copy of the install app on a USB drive.  This time I shut down the computers and booted into Safe Mode first and there were no problems. 
    I don't know if this issue is the one causing you these problems but it is a simple enough solution to try.
    Jay

  • Patch 120185-09 failed to install (SO update 5)

    hi,
    on a SunOS 5.9 Generic_117171-09 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-15000
    i have this error:
    Checking installed patches...
    Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
    Patch 120185-09 failed to install due to a failure produced by pkgadd.
    See /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log for details
    Patchadd is terminating.
    14:29 filesrv1:/home/mets1/wcohrs>more /var/sadm/patch/120185-09/log
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-es-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-fr-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-hu-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-it-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-nl-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-onlineupdate
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pl-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-pt-BR-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-ru-res
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-help
    Original package not installed.
    Package not patched:
    PKG=SUNWstaroffice-sv-res
    Original package not installed.
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed. This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    /mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/120185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: /mets1/user3/wcohrs/tmp/1
    20185-09/SUNWstaroffice-base/install/checkinstall: cannot open
    pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.
    please help
    regards
    Wolfgang
    Message was edited by:
    kasimong
    solved
    see
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5066286&tstart=0

    The StarOffice patches are most likely being recommended as there are one or more SUNWstaroffice packages installed on the system, but the patch installation cannot complete due to an incomplete installation of StarOffice. Check for any installed StarOffice packages and remove them if present:
    # pkginfo | grep SUNWstaroffice

  • Problem: installing Recommend Patch Cluster: patch 140900-10 fails

    I don't know if this is correct location for this thread (admin/moderator move as required).
    We have a number of Solaris x86 hosts (ie 4) and I'm trying to get the patched and up to date.
    I obtained the latest Recommended Patch Cluster (dated 28Sep2010).
    I installed it on host A yesterday, 2 hours 9 mins, no problems.
    I tried to install it on host B today, and that was just a critical failure.
    Host B failed to install 140900-01, because the non global zones rejected the patch because dependancy 138218-01 wasn't installed in the non global zones.
    Looking closer, it appears that 138218-01 is for global zone installation only; so it makes sense that the non global zones rejected it.
    However, both hosts were in single user mode when installing the cluster and both hosts have non global zones.
    140900-01 installed on host A with log:
    | This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    | version of a package which is already installed. This installation
    | will attempt to overwrite this package.
    |
    | Dryrun complete.
    | No changes were made to the system.
    |
    | This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    | version of a package which is already installed. This installation
    | will attempt to overwrite this package.
    |
    |
    | Installation of <SUNWcsu> was successful.
    140900-1 failed on host B with this log:
    | Validating patches...
    |
    | Loading patches installed on the system...
    |
    | Done!
    |
    | Loading patches requested to install.
    |
    | Done!
    |
    | Checking patches that you specified for installation.
    |
    | Done!
    |
    |
    | Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    |
    | 140900-01
    |
    |
    | Preparing checklist for non-global zone check...
    |
    | Checking non-global zones...
    |
    | Checking non-global zones...
    |
    | Restoring state for non-global zone X...
    | Restoring state for non-global zone Y...
    | Restoring state for non-global zone Z...
    |
    | This patch passes the non-global zone check.
    |
    | None.
    |
    |
    | Summary for zones:
    |
    | Zone X
    |
    | Rejected patches:
    | 140900-01
    | Patches that passed the dependency check:
    | None.
    |
    |
    | Zone Y
    |
    | Rejected patches:
    | 140900-01
    | Patches that passed the dependency check:
    | None.
    |
    |
    | Zone Z
    |
    | Rejected patches:
    | 140900-01
    | Patches that passed the dependency check:
    | None.
    |
    | Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
    | X: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
    | Y: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
    | Z: For patch 140900-01, required patch 138218-01 does not exist.
    | Fatal failure occurred - impossible to install any patches.
    | ----
    | patchadd exit code : 1
    | application of 140900-01 failed : unhandled subprocess exit status '1' (exit 1 b
    | ranch)
    | finish time : 2010.10.02 09:47:18
    | FINISHED : application of 140900-01
    It looks as if the patch strategy is completely different for the two hosts; both are solaris x86 (A is a V40z; B is a V20z).
    Trying to use "-G" with patchadd crabs the patch is for global zones only and stops (ie it's almost as if it thinks installation is being attempted in a non global zone).
    Without "-G" same behavior as patch cluster install attempt (no surprise there).
    I have inherited this machines; I am told each of these machines were upgraded to Solaris 10u6 in June 2009.
    Other than the 4-5 months it took oracle to get our update entitlement to us, we've had no problems.
    I'm at a loss here, I don't see anyone else having this type of issue.
    Can someone point the way...?
    What am I missing...?

    Well, I guess what you see isn't what you get.
    Guess I'm used to the fact USENET just left things formatted the way they were :-O

  • Sun Update Connection install fails on Patch 119574-02

    Just finished installing Solaris 10 (3/05) on my brand new Sun Blade 1500. I then downloaded the latest version of Sun Update Connection, but the installer fails as follows:
    # ./installUpdateConnection
    Adding patch 119574-02
    Validating patches...
    Loading patches installed on the system...
    Done!
    Loading patches requested to install.
    Done!
    Checking patches that you specified for installation.
    Done!
    Approved patches will be installed in this order:
    119574-02
    Checking installed patches...
    Verifying sufficient filesystem capacity (dry run method)...
    Patch 119574-02 failed to install due to a failure produced by pkgadd.
    See /var/sadm/patch/119574-02/log for details
    Patchadd is terminating.The above log file reads as follow:
    # cat /var/sadm/patch/119574-02/log
    This appears to be an attempt to install the same architecture and
    version of a package which is already installed.  This installation
    will attempt to overwrite this package.
    /export/home/richard.cross/updateConnection/patches/119574-02/SUNWcsu/install/checkinstall: /export/home/richard.cross/updateConnection/patches/119574-02/SUNWcsu/install/checkinstall: cannot open
    pkgadd: ERROR: checkinstall script did not complete successfully
    Dryrun complete.
    No changes were made to the system.Where have I gone wrong? I haven't done anything to my system between installing Solaris 10 and downloading SUC, so why is it complaining about an existing patch?

    Solved it. Solution is to move all of the patches into /var/spool/pkg and run patchadd on each one in there (in the right order).

  • Recommended patch 125541-02 fails to install

    Patch 125541-02 fails to install. When it is running patchadd perhaps, it complains that the dependency package SUNWthunderbird is not present. I am not inclined to search and add support for it unless it is necessary. I tried it five different hosts running Solaris 10. The results are the same.

    I had exactly the same results on a Sun Blade running Sol 10 11/06. The patch will not install using update manager, or with smpatch add -i, or from the manually downloaded patch using patchadd.
    The following requested patches have packages not installed on the system
    Package SUNWthunderbird from directory SUNWthunderbird in patch 125541-02 is not installed on the system. Changes for package SUNWthunderbird will not be applied to the system.

  • Patch 124171-01 fails to install

    Patch 124171-01 fails to install on an Ultra-80 and a V210 models. I installed it manually to get the message that the "SUNWscnbase-r" package is not installed so the patch is aborted.
    The Ultra-80 runs Solaris 10 release 03/2005. The V210 runs Solaris 10 01/2006. I typically load everything in the installs so this patch should not have been recommended to them.

    root hypert /var/sadm/spool # smpatch analyze
    124187-01 SunOS 5.10_x86: flash issue with SUNWscn-base due to broken package
    Maybe the patchinfo wasn't specific enough?
    root hypert /var/sadm/spool/124187-01.jar.dir/124187-01 # more patchinfo
    PATCHINFOVERSION="1.0"
    PATCHID=124187-01
    PATCH_CORRECTS='BaseOS.SolarisCore-5.10'
    PATCH_ARCH='i386'
    PATCH_OS='SunOS'
    PATCH_OSRELEASE='5.10'
    PATCH_PROPERTIES='clientroot'
    This seems to indicate all Solaris 10 systems would need this patch - but I don't know if UM uses this info when deciding which patches to recommend.

  • After 3 days onto the support at Adobe my cloud app still wont work. Error given is Install Failed!

    I have had creative cloud for over a month now and have not been able to get the thing to work. I have spent around 2 and a half days onto the technical support. I have tried it on two different laptops the second I brought to replace my old one as the first stopped working after the tech support had been messing with it. So I have tried it on Windows 7 and now Windows 8.1.
    After around 3 days onto the tech support I now have working copies of Photoshop and In Design. These were installed via work arounds! I still cant use creative cloud.
    I have tried to use the laptops on two different networks my home system and that at my university.
    I extremely frustrated by this as I am a student and am paying a lot for something which just seems to be useless. I also had to borrow a friends computer to do my assignments after spending 2 days wasted trying to get the thing working, so it is effecting my studies.
    Does any body know how I can sort this problem as the technical support seem to just be bodging things and the system is next to useless?
    My Lap top is running Windows 8.1 64bit. It has plenty of space available on the HDD and loads of RAM so should be no issues there.
    The virus protection is Kapersky but have tried with this disabled and also tried with McAfee on as laptop originally had this installed.

    Sarahb50875234 I am sorry you are facing difficulty using the Creative Cloud Desktop application.  Do you receive any specific error messages? What type of behavior are you experiencing?  You mentioned installing under Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 was this on two separate laptops or did you upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8.1?
    Finally you mentioned you spoke with a member of our support team.  Do you have a case number which I can reference?

Maybe you are looking for