Performance Evaluation to be done by HR Specialist

Hi All,
In Fusion Performance Management cycle, Line Manager will evaluate and provide the rate to Goals and Weightage in the performance document of employee.
Is there a possibility were HR Specialist can do the evaluation on behalf of the Line Manager.
Client HR wants to an evaluation and over write the ratings in Performance Document of employee.
Regards
Pradeep Badiganti

1. PL cannot be combined with CL, If employee is combining and applying for CL which has PL before then at the time of leave application, system to throw error message and should not allow him to apply for it
Ans:- For this you need to write a BADI/USER EXIT and Need to develop atable in se11 for Combination leaves this can be done by ABAPers
2. If employee is applying for sick leave in between PL then while applying for SL, should throw error message and should not him to apply for it
Ans:- For this you need to write a BADI/USER EXIT and Need to develop atable in se11 for Combination leaves this can be done by ABAPers
3. Holidays / Weekly offs falling betn PL treated as PL
Ans:-In this Table you can do this T556C or in Time Management -> Define Counting Rules
4. To chk for Saturday / sundays / holiday, if these holidays are falling between PL then PL to include / treat these holidays also
Leave taken during notice period, should throw error message and should not allow the user to apply
Can you  Explain me in brief  4th Question
Warm Regards
Raja Sekhar

Similar Messages

  • Database Performance Evaluation Benchmarking Tuning

    Does anyone by chance have any articles or websites that deal with Oracle (or generic) database performance evaluation, benchmarking, and/or tuning for a STANDALONE PC database installation? I have Oracle 10g installed on my personal machine and I want to find some information that will help me place the performance evaluation into a more professinal context. Any links relating to this would be very appreciated.
    regards,
    John

    Why do you expect there to be a difference in evaluating performance for a standalone PC database installation vs. a server database installation? Other than the fact that, presumably, you won't find network events in the top wait events, I'm hard-pressed to think of any differences.
    You would evaluate performance and tune the system the same way on a standalone database as on a database on a server box-- you would figure out what operations are important, figure out how quickly those operations need to run, figure out which of the important operations are running slowly, figure out what those operations are spending time doing, and then figure out how to reduce the runtime. Of course, each of those steps can potentially be rather involved. There are plenty of articles and books on performance tuning-- Oracle has a few manuals, Jonathan Lewis's book on the cost based optimizer is excellent, Cary Millsap's optimization book is top flight, etc.
    As for benchmarking, unless the intention is to run something like the TPC benchmark on your desktop, which would seem odd, your benchmark is generally closely tied to your application-- i.e. figuring out how quickly the system performs a particular business operation. Generic benchmarks like TPC tend not to be particularly useful in the real world because they are unlikely to mimic your real workload.
    Justin

  • Supplier performance evaluation

    Dear Guru's
    Can we include supplier survey response and transaction data from SAPSRM/ECC to determine the KPI of suppliers? Can we also include the supplier status like blocked or black listed, expired in the report?
    Can we include category of supplier (like small scale industry) in Supplier evaluation report?
    You thoughts on it will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan
    Ranjan Sutradhar

    Dear Experts,
    As mentioned in the above memo, a supplier can not see its performance evaluation by the buyer in SUS. Could you please share your thoughts on how we can enable our suppliers to see the vendor evaluation report in the SRM system?
    Any thoughts or idea will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ranjan

  • [svn] 2384: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

    Revision: 2384
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-07-08 06:23:19 -0700 (Tue, 08 Jul 2008)
    Log Message:
    The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
    The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
    QE: Yes
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Reviewer: Erik
    Bugs:
    SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
    Other Bugs Referenced:
    ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.1.0/lib/asc.jar
    flex/sdk/branches/3.1.0/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

    Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
    Regards
    TD

  • [svn] 2383: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

    Revision: 2383
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-07-08 06:22:40 -0700 (Tue, 08 Jul 2008)
    Log Message:
    The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
    The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
    QE: Yes
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Reviewer: Erik
    Bugs:
    SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
    Other Bugs Referenced:
    ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.3/lib/asc.jar
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.3/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

    Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
    Regards
    TD

  • [svn] 2377: The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations , but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release.

    Revision: 2377
    Author: [email protected]
    Date: 2008-07-07 14:38:01 -0700 (Mon, 07 Jul 2008)
    Log Message:
    The ASC fix for ASC-3414 resulted in a correction of the behavior of E4X filter expression evaluations, but we don't want to introduce this change in a Flex 3.0.x minor release. So I'm reverting this fix from the 3.0.x branch of ASC and checking in a new 1.4 downgraded asc.jar to reflect the change. This will be merged to other Flex 3 branches such as 3.0.3 and 3.1.0, but will not be merged to trunk.
    The change in behavior was noticed for Flex 3.0.x when a asc.jar was updated in revision 2108, and re-applied in revision 2129. Reverting this fix will resolve bug SDK-15924.
    QE: Yes
    Doc: No
    Checkintests: Pass
    Reviewer: Erik
    Bugs:
    SDK-15924 - Calling a .NET WebService always returns a fault (after build 2108)
    Other Bugs Referenced:
    ASC-3414 - with block uses local variable instead of object property when -warnings flag on
    Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-15924
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/ASC-3414
    Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/lib/asc.jar
    flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/modules/asc/src/java/macromedia/asc/embedding/LintEvaluator.java

    Yes but there's no point doing it here. As the Terms of Use make quite clear this is a User to User forum. It's Users like you talking to other Users. It's not a channel to communicate with Apple.
    Regards
    TD

  • SAP Performance Evaluation

    Hi: everybody
    We have implementated SAP for one year. Our headquarter will check out SAP system. I have to write a report to show our SAP system performance evaluation. I  wish him to satisfied with my team job. so this report will include hardware, business operation, user training, and so on. I think at least.
    Can everybody provide me a template about this report?
    Thank you!
    Henry

    Hi,
    Very intersting query. I spent some time and got this link:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/netweaver?rid=/webcontent/uuid/a06a3512-1a23-2a10-caa5-ee60d87ec953 [original link is broken],
    Please keep us updated if you find something useful.
    Regards,
    Rakesh

  • Agent performance evaluation

    Hi ,
    My company need to deploy the uccx script to add new feature with old script the feature is agent performance evaluation quality. once the agent the hung off the head set the system transfer the call the evaluationperformancequality and the customer press 1 excellent 2 very good 3 good 4 bad . and send all data to SQL server  the data incloud  ( time duration , agent ext , caller ID , date and time ) ,
      have we here uccx 8.5 the script attached. call manager 8.5, unity 8.5
    please i need assistance to create this feature in this script and how to trunking with SQL server
    thanks

    This is called post call survey and in UCCX is typically invoked with CAD workflow.
    Chris

  • Survey: Performance Evaluation of ERP-Systems

    Hello,
    In course of my Bachelor thesis I´m conducting a survey about u201EPerformance evaluation of ERP-Systemsu201D. I would like to ask you to take part in this survey; it will take you only about 10 minutes. The link below will lead you to the survey, which is available in German language only.
    http://erp-performance-umfrage.qpk.info
    Thank you very much for your time!
    Veronika Schreiber (Student at Technische Universität München)

    you need to look at the landscape the current system is in.
    How many systems are required for the full end to end processes?
    User friendly?
    What can SAP do that the other systems cant?
    Will these things/ processes add value to the business i.e. MSS/ ESS, SRM, FSCM
    How much manual work is required for month end?
    SAP it can be automated, and the key month end closing should be able to be reduced.
    Hope this gives you some ideas of what else to consider.
    Please award points if this is useful.

  • SSD & performance update 1.0: DON't ..

    better not to update this "performance" update when you are using SSD !!!

    Reporting back..…….
    I have bad news. Everything worked well as described above with my 256GB SuperTalent SSD until I tried to write a large file to it. It hangs after around 300 or 400 Megabytes have been written. Just as before.
    So next I roll back the EFI to 1.6 (my computer came out of the box with 1.7 when I bought it last August or September) and then it worked much better. I was able to clone to it (I have it partitioned into 3 separate volumes) for about 15 Gigabytes. But then it hangs. I restart and restart the cloning and am able to finish cloning. I then erased the clone partition, try it all again, and am to as successful. It hangs overtime halfway thru the 39GB clone process and requires restarts.
    This is as with EFI 1.6, Performance Update re-installed, and I THINK my SSDs firmware is 1571. I am not sure how I had determined that. I also do not know how to install and update to the SuperTalent SSD firmware with my Mac. I don't own a PC.
    Perhaps my next thing to try will be to turn OFF sleep mode for the drive and turn OFF SMS for the drive. My hopes are not very high however.
    For whatever reason, this computrer hangs requiring a force restart whenever writing large amounts of data to the SSD. I have no problem with the standard Hitachi 5400RPM and with a Western Digital 7200 I bought, and that is with EFI 1.7 and before they even came out with the new Performance Update 1.0.
    As far as sleep/wake goes, the computer will hang when doing a clone even if I am typing in a TextEdit document, so it would not be trying to sleep anyway.

  • TimesTen performance evaluation

    Hi all,
    I'm in a PoC and I have to compare the performance of an Oracle DB with and without the TT Cache.
    Is there an application which I can download that already does this? Generating workload and showing the results?
    Thank you!

    Typically TimesTen compliments the Oracle database. If the Oracle database can achieve the performance you require then there's no need for TT cache. If however Oracle database can't delver the performance needs of your application then you can look to use a caching technology such as TT cache to deliver microsecond response times and increased throughput by caching the data in-memory in the mid-tier. This is a long explanation to position why we don't have any specific code to compare the 2 products as they don't really compete with each other.
    There is some benchmarking code provided as part of the TT install in the quickstart directory. In particular a benchmark call tptbm. There's a JDBC and OCI version, the source code is there and could be modified to run against the Oracle database.
    Tim

  • Mac Pro 2013 and Premiere Pro - The performance issue that Adobe don't want us talking about!

    In May 2014 I bought a 2013 Mac Pro to help my business with the ever increasing demands video editing was placing on our systems.  I was so excited to see how the 12GB of power the AMD D700s would affect my workflow and ability to edit footage seamlessly without delays to the creative process.
    However, to my dismay pretty much since starting to work with the system I found that there was an issue with the GPUs, Mac OS and Adobe’s applications.  It was first reported by many other users in early 2014 and as yet know one from Adobe has really commented officially on the issue.
    Sadly it appears to still be present today and speaking with an Adobe rep confirmed this.  Trouble is no one is doing anything about it.  My hope is that, if you have watched this video and are experiencing the same issues then please let’s get the comments going, share and like the video and let’s get Adobe, Apple and AMD to pick up this with immediate haste! Thank you.
    Below is a video of the problem I have been experiencing.  It's a little long but I wanted to give a good account of the problem we are seeing so that someone can help! PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE help!
    Mac Pro 2013 and Premiere Pro GPU Issue - YouTube
    Thank you for your time and I'd love someone to help!

    Thanks for responding!  It's such a pain and I have been chatting to one of Adobe's senior consultants about this and still none the wiser.  I have sent my machine off to the retailer as it was still under warranty.  Nothing wrong with GPU apparently which is a relief although I kinda wish it had been that as it would have been an easier fix.  Adobe told me that working with H.264 is totally possible but if you have a complex sequence with multicam and nested video with effects applied then it will seriously hinder performance.  Sadly transcoding to ProRes doesn't seem to help either and they suggested not adding any effects to the nested clips, flattening out the multi cams etc and this has improved things a bit.  Sent a sequence to SpeedGrade the other day though and the machine had a fit.  FCPX though seems to be working great and has a few advantages over Premiere so I may be making a switch for this type of work until Adobe can sort out this issue.  I still feel that the application isn't fully making the most of the GPUs.  In fact, I found out that multicam is actually all still on the CPU and that they are trying to implement GPU handling of multicam soon.

  • ASM performance evaluation

    Dear All:
    We got the 8 Luns of each 100GB distributed across a diskgroup for our data/index storage. We ran massive update/insert statements on the tables built with indexes so there were numerous dbfile sequential reads.
    We run the ADDM reports based on snapshots taken during these updates and Oracle alerted on I/O throughputs.
    ***The average response time for single block reads was 99 milliseconds.
    *** Average datafile I/O throughput was 720K per second per reads and 1.2M per second per writes.
    *** Even we already implemented ASM, oracle recommendation was to engage ASM, which is confusing.
    *** On some index files, the average response time is >500 Milliseconds for single block.
    Now what is meant by average response time per single block ? Is it database block or the stripe size for the diskgroup (1 MB I assume).
    On the dbconsole, ASM performance TAB, we could see the response time, throughput in MB per second. Is there any script to get those info ? And what is an ideal benchmark for ASM throughput, single block average response time.
    Any help, advise, suggestion will be highly appreciated.

    user12018084 wrote:
    On the dbconsole, ASM performance TAB, we could see the response time, throughput in MB per second. Is there any script to get those info ? And what is an ideal benchmark for ASM throughput, single block average response time. I do not understand how you can benchmark ASM using I/O.
    I/O is directly dependent on your I/O subsystem. The driver, the hardware, the cable, the storage array, the speed of the disks. For example, if you use a PCI-X HCA card for your connectivity to a storage systen and not PCI-E, you have a very specific max thruput imposed on your I/O layer. Which would not have existed if you used PCI-E instead. Or your storage array could be implementing RAID5 without ASIC support, resulting in a hefty overhead for parity calculation on write I/O. Or your RAID10 storage array could have 5 striped sets across 2 disks per set, instead of a single set across 10 disks.
    And now you want to measure I/O at ASM level (btw, who - which process- actually writes to disk?).. and then blame ASM for poor I/O performance?

  • Cisco nam 2204 performance evaluation

    Hi,
    We are planning export 500 Netflow of ISR G2 to a NAM2204-RJ45 appliance.
    But I Cannot find information about NAM2204-RJ45 Netflow Data Export performance.
    Can someone share user experience?

    The 2204 is an appliance with 4 gigabit ports where the ISR is a module with two ports.
    2204 data sheet:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/netmgtsw/ps5740/ps5688/ps10113/data_sheet_c78-655535.html
    ISR data sheet:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/netmgtsw/ps5740/ps11658/data_sheet_c78-655516.html

  • Umfrage: Performance Evaluation von ERP-Systemen

    Hallo,
    Ich studiere an der Technischen Universität München Wirtschaftsinformatik. Im Zuge meiner Bachelorarbeit mache ich eine Umfrage über die u201EBeurteilung der Leistungsfähigkeit von ERP-Systemenu201C. Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wenn Sie mich unterstützen könnten, und den Fragebogen ausfüllen. Es beansprucht nicht mehr als 10 Minuten. Die Umfrage ist auf Deutsch und bezieht sich auf Unternehmen/Organisationen, die mit ERP-Systemen arbeiten. In dem Fragebogen geht es im Allgemeinen darum, ob Sie/Ihr Unternehmen die Leistung Ihrer ERP-Systeme messen und beurteilen.
    Die Auswertung der Befragung erfolgt völlig anonym und lässt keine Rückschlüsse auf Ihre Person oder Ihr Unternehmen zu.
    Vielen Dank für ihre Unterstützung,
    Hier ist der Link zur Umfrage:
    http://erp-performance-umfrage.qpk.info
    Veronika Schreiber

    Hallo,
    Vielen Dank für Ihre zahlreiche Teilnahme an meiner Umfrage u201EBeurteilung der Leistungsfähigkeit von ERP-Systemenu201C.
    Heute (05.01.2011) ist der letzte Tag der Umfrage. Wenn Sie heute noch 10 Minuten Zeit finden, würde ich mich sehr freuen, wenn sie an der Umfrage teilnehmen würden!
    Über jede weitere Unterstützung würde ich mich noch sehr freuen.
    Vielen Dank!
    Veronika Schreiber

Maybe you are looking for

  • Default date on selection-screen.

    Hi ABAPers, My requirement is that, i have one period(date) select-option in my selection screen. Now the problem was basing on the month the first and last date of that particular month should be initialised. For Ex:- present month was may, so in se

  • Wireless mouse stops touch mouse from working

    Ive just recently bought a wireless gaming mouse for my laptop yet everytime I turn off my wireless mouse and take out the receiver I cant use my touch mouse on my laptop. It might just be an amateur mistake ive done somewhere but would like some sug

  • Url editing problem in jsp

    hi to all,i am very new to jsp ,my problem is i want client server interaction only through forms,suppose when the user perform some action on a button i am displaying the results according to client request,then user sees the url like this requested

  • Clone stamp tool won't apply

    Hello all, I just moved to CC and I'm having trouble applying the clone stamp tool. So, I create a duplicate unlocked layer and select my area to clone from using ALT. When I hover over the area to place the clone it previews what it'll look like, bu

  • Is There Any Secret Code?

    Hi all, I've recently heard that there are codes that can make voice calls cheaper, or even at no-cost. I wonder if there exist any, & what are those codes (specially for N70),& Why did the company put such codes on the phones?