Performance issue in ALV

Hi
I have performance problem while calling an ALV function module:
the code is as follows:
call function 'REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY'
          exporting
            i_callback_program      = 'SAPLZIIS_WSTRAT'
            i_callback_user_command = 'USER_COMMAND'
            is_layout               = ls_layout
            i_grid_title            = 'Strategie Auswertung'(m23)
            it_fieldcat             = lt_fieldcat[]
            it_excluding            = lt_excluding_fcode[]
            it_sort                 = lt_sort[]
            i_default               = 'X'
            i_save                  = 'A'
            i_screen_start_column   = 25
            i_screen_start_line     = 2
            i_screen_end_column     = 180
            i_screen_end_line       = 45
          tables
            t_outtab                = gi_ziis_strat_show
          exceptions
            program_error           = 1
            others                  = 2.
gi_ziis_strat_show is the structure created in se11. It has around 50 fields and all of them have to be dispalyed.
Kindly help.
Thanks
Subha
Moderator message - Please use code tags to format your code
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Feb 18, 2010 9:07 AM

Hi Subha,
Try implementing OSS Note 766697 in your sandbox and test to see if it fixes your performance issue.

Similar Messages

Performance issue with ALV Grid in Module Pool

Hi Experts,
I am using an editable ALV Grid on a screen. This ALV does not have too many fields and is called in modal dialog box.
I call this screen from a standard transaction. The problem is this screen is taking 3-4 seconds to load. I checked that fetching the data is not a problem and only after the call screen statement, the processing becomes very slow. Is this due to ALV grid. Please help as this is urgently needed and I cannot change from ALV to table control. Please suggest if anything can b done?
Regards
Satish

Hi Satish,
I hope there is a chance to do the SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY or preparation of field catalog earlier, i.e. in INITILIZATION event and then later just exchange table contents before display. That will reduce time.
Regards,
Clemens

Issue in ALV List display

Issue in ALV List display
Posted: Apr 5, 2008 10:25 AM     Edit      E-mail this message      Reply
Hi Friends,
Can any one help me out in the logic to display the output in the ALV list.
i want to get the out put as
based on the field4 i have to display fieds5, field6 and field 7 values as mentioned below.
field1 field2 field3 field4 field5 field6 field7
0L 123 456 2008 001 123.00 456.00
-    -     -       -     002 213.00 789.00
-      -       -     003 0.00     0.00
-      -       -     004 0.00     0.00
-      -        -    005 0.00     0.00
-       -       -     006 0.00     0.00
                               336.00 1245.00
Thanks,
Vijay

for display you have to define fieldcatlaog and use Fm RESUE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY,
Go through this program
*& Report Z_OPEN_CLOSE                                                *
REPORT Z_OPEN_CLOSE MESSAGE-ID YW2 LINE-SIZE 231 LINE-COUNT 45
NO STANDARD PAGE HEADING.
Type Declaration *
TYPE-POOLS SLIS.
Tables *
TABLES: MKPF, " Material Document: Header Data
        MSEG, " Material Document: Item Data
        MARA,
        MARD,
        S031,
        EKKO,
        EKPO,
        LIKP,
        MAKT,
        J_1IWRKCUS,
        T001W,
        WB2_V_MKPF_MSEG2,
        MMIM_REP_PRINT,
        YW2_STKMOVEMENTS,
        YPLNT,
        MARDH.
Internal Tables *
DATA: I_WERKS LIKE J_1IWRKCUS OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_YPLNT OCCURS 0,
         PPLNT LIKE YPLNT-PPLNT,
         WPLNT LIKE YPLNT-WPLNT,
      END OF I_YPLNT.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MKPF OCCURS 0,
        MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
        MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
        BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT,
        VGART LIKE MKPF-VGART,
        BWART LIKE MSEG-BWART,
        MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR,
        WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS,
        LGORT LIKE MSEG-LGORT,
        MENGE LIKE MSEG-MENGE,
        MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
        KUNNR LIKE MSEG-KUNNR,
        ZEILE LIKE MSEG-ZEILE,
        XAUTO LIKE MSEG-XAUTO,
        SHKZG LIKE MSEG-SHKZG,
        MATNR1 LIKE MSEG-MATNR,
      END OF I_MKPF.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MARDH OCCURS 0,
       WERKS LIKE MARDH-WERKS,
       MEINS LIKE MARA-MEINS,
       MATNR LIKE MARDH-MATNR,
       LGORT LIKE MARDH-LGORT,
       LABST LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       LFGJA LIKE MARDH-LFGJA, "Added -MB
       LFMON LIKE MARDH-LFMON, "Added -MB
       PERIO(6),
       INSME LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       EINME LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       SPEME LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       RETME LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       O_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Opening Stock
       C_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Closing Stock
      END OF I_MARDH.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MARD OCCURS 0,
       WERKS LIKE MARD-WERKS,
       MATNR LIKE MARD-MATNR,
       LGORT LIKE MARD-LGORT,
       LABST LIKE MARD-LABST,
       INSME LIKE MARD-LABST,
       MEINS LIKE MARA-MEINS,
       EINME LIKE MARD-LABST,
       SPEME LIKE MARD-LABST,
       RETME LIKE MARD-LABST,
      END OF I_MARD.
DATA: I_MARD1 LIKE I_MARD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: I_MARDH1 LIKE I_MARDH OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MKPF1 OCCURS 0,
        MBLNR LIKE MKPF-MBLNR,
        WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS,
        MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR,
        BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT,
        BWART LIKE MSEG-BWART,
        MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
        VGART LIKE MKPF-VGART,
        LGORT LIKE MSEG-LGORT,
        MENGE LIKE MSEG-MENGE,
        MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
        XAUTO LIKE MSEG-XAUTO,
        SHKZG LIKE MSEG-SHKZG,
      END OF I_MKPF1.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MKPF2 OCCURS 0,
       WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS,
       MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR,
       BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT,
       BWART LIKE MSEG-BWART,
       MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
       VGART LIKE MKPF-VGART,
       LGORT LIKE MSEG-LGORT,
       MENGE LIKE MSEG-MENGE,
       MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
       XAUTO LIKE MSEG-XAUTO,
     END OF I_MKPF2.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_FINAL5 OCCURS 0,
       WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS, " Plant
       MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR, " Material
       LGORT LIKE MSEG-LGORT, " Storage Location
       BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT, " Posting Date
       MTART LIKE MARA-MTART, " Material Type
       SPMON LIKE S031-SPMON, " Month
       MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX, " Description
meins(3), " UOM
        MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
        O_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " opening stock
        TRECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total receipts
        PRODU LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Production
        RECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Receipts
        SAL_RET LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Sales Return
        TDISP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total dispatches
        CUSTMR LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - Customers
        OPLANT LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - To Other Plant
        TLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Total Loss
        TRLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Transit Loss
        WHLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Warehouse Loss
        C_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Closing Stock
        TRFSTK LIKE MARDH-LABST, "Transfer stock
        MENGE LIKE MSEG-MENGE,
        OTHADJ LIKE MARDH-LABST,
      END OF I_FINAL5.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_FINAL OCCURS 0,
        WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS, " Plant
        MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR, " Material
        BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT, " Posting Date
        MTART LIKE MARA-MTART, " Material Type
        SPMON LIKE S031-SPMON, " Month
        MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX, " Description
meins(3), " UOM
        MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
        O_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " opening stock
        TRECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total receipts
        PRODU LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Production
        RECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Receipts
        SAL_RET LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Sales Return
        TDISP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total dispatches
        CUSTMR LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - Customers
        OPLANT LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - To Other Plant
        TRFSTK LIKE MARDH-LABST, "Material Transfer stock
        TRLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Transit Loss
        WHLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Warehouse Loss
        TLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Total Loss
        C_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Closing Stock
        OTHADJ LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       END OF I_FINAL.
DATA: I_FINAL1 LIKE I_FINAL OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_FINAL_TEMP OCCURS 0,
        WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS, " Plant
        MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR, " Material
        MTART LIKE MARA-MTART, " Material Type
        MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX, " Description
        MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
        O_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " opening stock
        TRECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total receipts
        PRODU LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Production
        RECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Receipts
        SAL_RET LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Sales Return
        TDISP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total dispatches
        CUSTMR LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - Customers
        OPLANT LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - To Other Plant
        TRFSTK LIKE MARDH-LABST, "Material Transfer stock
        TRLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Transit Loss
        WHLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Warehouse Loss
        TLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Total Loss
        C_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Closing Stock
        OTHADJ LIKE MARDH-LABST,
      END OF I_FINAL_TEMP.
For Materials
DATA: BEGIN OF I_MARA OCCURS 0,
       MATNR TYPE MARA-MATNR,
       MTART TYPE MARA-MTART,
       MEINS LIKE MARA-MEINS,
       LABST TYPE MARD-LABST,
       MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX,
      END OF I_MARA.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_STKMVMNTS OCCURS 0,
       BWART LIKE MSEG-BWART,
       SHKZG LIKE MSEG-SHKZG,
       VZBEW LIKE YW2_STKMOVEMENTS-VZBEW,
      END OF I_STKMVMNTS.
DATA: BEGIN OF I_FINALT OCCURS 0,
       WERKS LIKE MSEG-WERKS, " Plant
       MATNR LIKE MSEG-MATNR, " Material
       BUDAT LIKE MKPF-BUDAT, " Posting Date
       MTART LIKE MARA-MTART, " Material Type
       SPMON LIKE S031-SPMON, " Month
       MAKTX LIKE MAKT-MAKTX, " Description
meins(3), " UOM
       MEINS LIKE MSEG-MEINS,
       O_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " opening stock
       TRECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total receipts
       PRODU LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Production
       RECEP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Receipts
       SAL_RET LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Receipts - Sales Return
       TDISP LIKE MARDH-LABST, " total dispatches
       CUSTMR LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - Customers
       OPLANT LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Net Dispatches - To Other Plant
       TRFSTK LIKE MARDH-LABST, "Material Transfer stock
       TRLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Transit Loss
       WHLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Warehouse Loss
       TLOSS LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Total Loss
       C_STK LIKE MARDH-LABST, " Closing Stock
       OTHADJ LIKE MARDH-LABST,
       MONTH(8) ,
      END OF I_FINALT.
DATA: IMKPFT LIKE I_MKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: IMKPFT1 LIKE I_MKPF1 OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: IMARDT LIKE I_MARD OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: IMARDHT LIKE I_MARDH OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: T_FINAL LIKE I_MKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: IMKPFT2 LIKE I_MKPF OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
FCAT is used for the field catalog
DATA: FCAT TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_FIELDCAT_ALV WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                  WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
for excluding the ICONs from the application toolbar
      FEXC TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_EXTAB WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                 WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
FS_LAYO is used for Grid Layout
      FS_LAYO TYPE SLIS_LAYOUT_ALV,
FEVENTS to handle the events TOP OF PAGE & USER_COMMAND
      FEVENTS TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_ALV_EVENT WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                 WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
FHEADER is used for List header
      FHEADER TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_LISTHEADER WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                 WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
sort is used for sorting
      FSORT TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_SORTINFO_ALV WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                 WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
      FCAT1 TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_FIELDCAT_ALV WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
                WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
      FS_LAYO1 TYPE SLIS_LAYOUT_ALV,
      GT_LIST_TOP_OF_PAGE1 TYPE SLIS_T_LISTHEADER,
      FEVENTS1 TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_ALV_EVENT WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT KEY
             WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
       FHEADER1 TYPE TABLE OF SLIS_LISTHEADER WITH NON-UNIQUE DEFAULT
              KEY WITH HEADER LINE INITIAL SIZE 0,
       G_STATU_071 TYPE SLIS_FORMNAME VALUE 'Z_PFSTATUS',
       ALV_VARIANT1 LIKE DISVARIANT.
Variable Declaration *
TYPES: TRFF_TYPE_DEC_6_5(6) TYPE P DECIMALS 5.
DATA: FYEAR(4),
      MON(2),
      FYEAR1(4),
      MON1(2),
      OBAL LIKE MARD-LABST,
      CBAL LIKE MARD-LABST,
      INDEX TYPE I,
      COUNT,
      COUNT1 TYPE I,
      O_STK TYPE P DECIMALS 3,
      C_STK TYPE P DECIMALS 3,
      V_MJAHR LIKE MKPF-MJAHR,
      MONTHS TYPE TRFF_TYPE_DEC_6_5,
      MONTH TYPE I.
Global variables for handling ALV functionality
DATA: ALV_KEYINFO TYPE SLIS_KEYINFO_ALV,
      ALV_VARIANT LIKE DISVARIANT,
      ALV_LAYOUT TYPE SLIS_LAYOUT_ALV,
      ALV_REPID LIKE SY-REPID,
      ALV_PRINT TYPE SLIS_PRINT_ALV,
      ALV_DETAIL_FUNC(30),
      ALV_DEFAULT_VARIANT LIKE DISVARIANT-VARIANT,
      ALV_COLOURIZE_FIELDS LIKE MMIM_REP_PRINT-COLOR.
RANGES: R_BUDAT FOR MKPF-BUDAT.
*Added by Prabhu for year on 26.4.05.
DATA: IDATE LIKE R_BUDAT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
Selection Screen Elements *
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK BLK WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-001.
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_WERKS FOR MARD-WERKS OBLIGATORY NO INTERVALS.
PARAMETER: P_SPMON LIKE S031-SPMON NO-DISPLAY .
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_MATNR FOR MARA-MATNR OBLIGATORY,
                  S_LGORT FOR MSEG-LGORT NO-EXTENSION NO INTERVALS,
                  S_MBLNR FOR MKPF-MBLNR,
                  S_BUDAT FOR MKPF-BUDAT OBLIGATORY .
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK BLK.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK BLK3 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-004.
      PARAMETER : MTART LIKE MARA-MTART DEFAULT 'FERT' NO-DISPLAY.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK BLK3.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK BLK2 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-003.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK BLK2.
ADDED BY PRABHU FOR DAY-WISE REPORT.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK B3 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-007.
PARAMETERS: D1 RADIOBUTTON GROUP P1 DEFAULT 'X',
              M1 RADIOBUTTON GROUP P1,
              Y1 RADIOBUTTON GROUP P1.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK B3.
SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK B2 WITH FRAME TITLE TEXT-006.
PARAMETERS: ALV_DEF LIKE DISVARIANT-VARIANT.
SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK B2.
DATA: S_BUDAT1 LIKE S_BUDAT OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE."prabhu
Initialization *
INITIALIZATION.
PERFORM ALV_INIT.
AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR ALV_DEF.
PERFORM ALV_F4.
At Selection Screen
*AT SELECTION-SCREEN ON VALUE-REQUEST FOR p_spmon.
PERFORM monat_f4.
At Selection Screen *
AT SELECTION-SCREEN.
checking for the layout
PERFORM ALV_CHECK.
authorisation check for the Plant
PERFORM auth_check.
Validation for the Plant
PERFORM VALIDITY_CHECK.
IF MTART NE 'FERT'.
    MESSAGE E041 WITH 'Material Type must be FERT Only...'.
ENDIF.
IF D1 = 'X'." On 26.4.05.
    P_SPMON0(4) = S_BUDAT-LOW0(4).
    P_SPMON4(2) = S_BUDAT-LOW4(2).
ELSE.
    P_SPMON0(4) = S_BUDAT-LOW0(4).
    P_SPMON4(2) = S_BUDAT-LOW4(2).
ENDIF.
LOOP AT S_BUDAT.
    IF S_BUDAT-HIGH IS INITIAL.
      S_BUDAT-HIGH = S_BUDAT-LOW.
      MODIFY S_BUDAT.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
IDATE-LOW = S_BUDAT-LOW.
IDATE-HIGH = S_BUDAT-HIGH.
CALL FUNCTION 'FIMA_DAYS_AND_MONTHS_AND_YEARS'
    EXPORTING
       I_DATE_FROM = IDATE-LOW
       I_DATE_TO = IDATE-HIGH
   IMPORTING
E_DAYS =
      E_MONTHS = MONTH
E_YEARS =
DATA: I(3) TYPE C.
I = S_BUDAT-LOW+4(2).
CLEAR: R_BUDAT.
REFRESH: R_BUDAT.
*added by Prabhu for Only for Oneday.on 18.5.5
IF MONTH EQ '0'.
    MONTH = MONTH + 1.
ENDIF.
*added by Prabhu for Only for Oneday.on 18.5.5
DO MONTH TIMES.
    R_BUDAT-LOW = S_BUDAT-LOW.
    APPEND R_BUDAT.
ENDDO.
I = 0.
LOOP AT R_BUDAT.
    R_BUDAT-LOW4(2) = S_BUDAT-LOW4(2) + I.
    I = I + 1.
    R_BUDAT-LOW+6(2) = '01'.
    MODIFY R_BUDAT.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT R_BUDAT.
    CALL FUNCTION 'RP_LAST_DAY_OF_MONTHS'
       EXPORTING
         DAY_IN = R_BUDAT-LOW
       IMPORTING
         LAST_DAY_OF_MONTH = R_BUDAT-HIGH
      EXCEPTIONS
        DAY_IN_NO_DATE = 1
        OTHERS = 2
    MODIFY R_BUDAT.
ENDLOOP.
LOOP AT R_BUDAT.
    IF R_BUDAT-LOW4(2) = S_BUDAT-LOW4(2).
      R_BUDAT-LOW = S_BUDAT-LOW.
      MODIFY R_BUDAT.
    ENDIF.
    IF R_BUDAT-HIGH4(2) = S_BUDAT-HIGH4(2).
      R_BUDAT-HIGH = S_BUDAT-HIGH.
      MODIFY R_BUDAT.
    ENDIF.
For Summary on 26.4.05.
    IF Y1 = 'X'.
      CLEAR R_BUDAT.
      REFRESH R_BUDAT.
      R_BUDAT-LOW = S_BUDAT-LOW.
      R_BUDAT-HIGH = S_BUDAT-HIGH.
      APPEND R_BUDAT.
      CLEAR R_BUDAT.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
At Selection Screen *
AT SELECTION-SCREEN OUTPUT.
Start of Selection *
START-OF-SELECTION.
V_MJAHR = P_SPMON+0(4).
Get plant distinction warehouse/production
PERFORM GET_PLANT_DISTINCTION.
Collect the data from various tables
PERFORM GETDATA_FG_STOCK.
here the number of rows in the output table is found
PERFORM OUTPUT_TABLE_CHECK.
here the top of the page code is written, that is to be displayed
in the output
PERFORM Z_TOP_OF_PAGE.
here ALV layout properties are set
PERFORM Z_LAYOUT_SETTINGS.
ALV EVENTS for TOP OF PAGE and for USER COMMAND
PERFORM Z_ALV_EVENTS.
The field catalog is defined for the Primary List is defined in
the subroutine CREATE_FIELD_CATALOG include program ZPRRDOCR_FCAT
PERFORM Z_CREATE_FIELD_CATALOG.
This is for displaying the output
PERFORM Z_REUSE_ALV_GRID_DISPLAY.
*& Form getdata_fg_stock
Getting data from standard tables
FORM GETDATA_FG_STOCK.
For getting the Start date & end date of the month
PERFORM get_month_dates.
Getting the Opening Stock from MARDH table
IF MON EQ '01'.
    MON1 = MON.
    FYEAR1 = FYEAR.
    MON = '12'.
    FYEAR = FYEAR - 1.
ELSE.
    MON1 = MON.
    FYEAR1 = FYEAR.
    MON = MON - 1.
    FYEAR = FYEAR.
ENDIF.
PERFORM GET_RECORDS_FROM_DB.
*added for Month Summary on 26.4.05.
LOOP AT R_BUDAT.
    S_BUDAT-LOW = R_BUDAT-LOW.
    S_BUDAT-HIGH = R_BUDAT-HIGH.
*for Month
    P_SPMON0(4) = S_BUDAT-LOW0(4).
    P_SPMON4(2) = S_BUDAT-LOW4(2).
*for summary.
    IF Y1 = 'X'.
      LOOP AT S_BUDAT.
        S_BUDAT1-SIGN = 'I'.
        S_BUDAT1-OPTION = 'NB'.
        S_BUDAT1-LOW = S_BUDAT-LOW.
        S_BUDAT1-HIGH = S_BUDAT-HIGH.
        APPEND S_BUDAT1.
        CLEAR S_BUDAT1.
      ENDLOOP.
    ENDIF.
    IMKPFT[] = I_MKPF[].
    IMKPFT2[] = I_MKPF[].
    IMARDT[] = I_MARD[].
    IMARDHT[] = I_MARDH[].
    PERFORM MONTH_WISE.
    PERFORM PROCESS_MOVEMENTS.
    PERFORM CALCULATE_OPENING_STOCK.
    PERFORM UPDATE_NON_TRANSACTION_ITMS.
    PERFORM DELETE_EMPTY_RECORDS.
    CLEAR: IMARDHT,IMARDT,IMKPFT1,IMKPFT,I_FINAL,I_FINAL5.
    REFRESH: IMARDHT,IMARDT,IMKPFT1,I_FINAL,I_FINAL5,IMKPFT.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR: R_BUDAT.
REFRESH: R_BUDAT.
*end of changes for month.
ENDFORM. " getdata_fg_stock
FORM MONAT_F4 *
F4-Hilfe für Monat *
FORM MONAT_F4.
DATA: BEGIN OF MF_DYNPFIELDS OCCURS 1.
          INCLUDE STRUCTURE DYNPREAD.
DATA: END OF MF_DYNPFIELDS.
DATA: MF_RETURNCODE LIKE SY-SUBRC,
         MF_MONAT LIKE ISELLIST-MONTH,
         MF_HLP_REPID LIKE SY-REPID.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: .
Wert von Dynpro lesen
GET CURSOR FIELD MF_DYNPFIELDS-FIELDNAME.
APPEND MF_DYNPFIELDS.
MF_HLP_REPID = SY-REPID.
DO 2 TIMES.
    CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_READ'
      EXPORTING
        DYNAME               = MF_HLP_REPID
        DYNUMB               = SY-DYNNR
      TABLES
        DYNPFIELDS           = MF_DYNPFIELDS
      EXCEPTIONS
        INVALID_ABAPWORKAREA = 01
        INVALID_DYNPROFIELD = 02
        INVALID_DYNPRONAME   = 03
        INVALID_DYNPRONUMMER = 04
        INVALID_REQUEST      = 05
        NO_FIELDDESCRIPTION = 06
        UNDEFIND_ERROR       = 07.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 3.
Aktuelles Dynpro ist Wertemengenbild
      MF_HLP_REPID = 'SAPLALDB'.
    ELSE.
      READ TABLE MF_DYNPFIELDS INDEX 1.
Unterstriche durch Blanks ersetzen
      TRANSLATE MF_DYNPFIELDS-FIELDVALUE USING '_ '.
      EXIT.
    ENDIF.
ENDDO.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Konvertierung ins interne Format
    CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_PERI_INPUT'
      EXPORTING
        INPUT         = MF_DYNPFIELDS-FIELDVALUE
      IMPORTING
        OUTPUT        = MF_MONAT
      EXCEPTIONS
        ERROR_MESSAGE = 1.
    IF MF_MONAT IS INITIAL.
Monat ist initial => Vorschlagswert aus akt. Datum ableiten
      MF_MONAT = SY-DATLO(6).
    ENDIF.
    CALL FUNCTION 'POPUP_TO_SELECT_MONTH'
      EXPORTING
        ACTUAL_MONTH               = MF_MONAT
      IMPORTING
        SELECTED_MONTH             = MF_MONAT
        RETURN_CODE                = MF_RETURNCODE
      EXCEPTIONS
        FACTORY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND = 01
        HOLIDAY_CALENDAR_NOT_FOUND = 02
        MONTH_NOT_FOUND            = 03.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0 AND MF_RETURNCODE = 0.
ASSIGN (MF_DYNPFIELDS-FIELDNAME) TO <MF_FELD>. " ==>> note 148804
<MF_FELD> = MF_MONAT.
      CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_PERI_OUTPUT'
        EXPORTING
          INPUT = MF_MONAT
        IMPORTING
          OUTPUT = MF_DYNPFIELDS-FIELDVALUE.
      COLLECT MF_DYNPFIELDS.
      CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
        EXPORTING
          DYNAME               = MF_HLP_REPID
          DYNUMB               = SY-DYNNR
        TABLES
          DYNPFIELDS           = MF_DYNPFIELDS
        EXCEPTIONS
          INVALID_ABAPWORKAREA = 01
          INVALID_DYNPROFIELD = 02
          INVALID_DYNPRONAME   = 03
          INVALID_DYNPRONUMMER = 04
          INVALID_REQUEST      = 05
          NO_FIELDDESCRIPTION = 06
          UNDEFIND_ERROR       = 07. "<<== note 148804
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                                                    "MONAT_F4
*& Form get_month_dates
Calculating the Month Start & End Date
FORM GET_MONTH_DATES.
IF M1 = 'X'.
    FYEAR = P_SPMON+0(4).
    MON = P_SPMON+4(2).
    CONCATENATE FYEAR MON '01' INTO R_BUDAT-LOW.
    R_BUDAT-SIGN = 'I'.
    R_BUDAT-OPTION = 'BT'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BKK_GET_MONTH_LASTDAY'
      EXPORTING
        I_DATE = R_BUDAT-LOW
      IMPORTING
        E_DATE = R_BUDAT-HIGH.
    APPEND R_BUDAT.
    CLEAR S_BUDAT.
    REFRESH S_BUDAT.
    S_BUDAT-SIGN = 'I'.
    S_BUDAT-OPTION = 'BT'.
    S_BUDAT-LOW = R_BUDAT-LOW.
    S_BUDAT-HIGH = R_BUDAT-HIGH.
    APPEND S_BUDAT.
ELSE.
    FYEAR = P_SPMON+0(4).
    MON = P_SPMON+4(2).
    CONCATENATE FYEAR MON '01' INTO R_BUDAT-LOW.
    R_BUDAT-SIGN = 'I'.
    R_BUDAT-OPTION = 'BT'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BKK_GET_MONTH_LASTDAY'
      EXPORTING
        I_DATE = R_BUDAT-LOW
      IMPORTING
        E_DATE = R_BUDAT-HIGH.
    APPEND R_BUDAT.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. " get_month_dates
*& Form output_table_Check
checking for records for output
FORM OUTPUT_TABLE_CHECK .
DESCRIBE TABLE I_FINALT LINES INDEX.
IF INDEX EQ 0.
    MESSAGE I041 WITH TEXT-005.
    LEAVE LIST-PROCESSING.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. "OUTPUT_TABLE_CHECK
*& Form Z_TOP_OF_PAGE
for setting the details in the top of page *
has no formal paramters *
FORM Z_TOP_OF_PAGE.
DATA: V_MON(2),
V_YR(40),
V_FIN(18),
V_FIN1(48),
LOW(10),
HIGH(10).
V_MON = P_SPMON+4(2).
V_YR = P_SPMON+0(4).
FHEADER-TYP = 'H'.
FHEADER-INFO = 'Stock Register Report (FG Stock)'.
APPEND FHEADER.
CLEAR FHEADER.
*if m1 = 'X'.
CONCATENATE 'Month = ' v_mon '.' v_yr INTO v_fin.
fheader-typ = 'H'.
fheader-info = v_fin.
APPEND fheader.
CLEAR fheader.
*endif."prabhu on 18.5.5
IF D1 = 'X'.
    CLEAR S_BUDAT.
    LOOP AT S_BUDAT.
      CONCATENATE S_BUDAT-LOW6(2) '/' S_BUDAT-LOW4(2) '/'
      S_BUDAT-LOW+0(4) INTO LOW.
      CONCATENATE S_BUDAT-HIGH6(2) '/' S_BUDAT-HIGH4(2) '/'
      S_BUDAT-HIGH+0(4) INTO HIGH.
      CONCATENATE 'Date = ' LOW ' - ' HIGH INTO V_FIN1.
      FHEADER-TYP = 'H'.
      FHEADER-INFO = V_FIN1.
      APPEND FHEADER.
      CLEAR FHEADER.
    ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. " Z_TOP_OF_PAGE
*& Form Z_LAYOUT_SETTINGS
this is done for setting the properties for the layout of the *
grid *
has no formal paramters *
FORM Z_LAYOUT_SETTINGS.
FS_LAYO-ZEBRA = 'X'. " Output in Zebra pattern
FS_LAYO-DETAIL_POPUP = 'X'. " A popup window appears to give
FS_LAYO-DETAIL_TITLEBAR = TEXT-022.
FS_LAYO-COLWIDTH_OPTIMIZE = 'X'.
ENDFORM. " Z_LAYOUT_SETTINGS
*& Form Z_ALV_EVENTS
This is used for handling the events TOP OF PAGE and the USER *
COMMAND event *
has no formal paramters *
FORM Z_ALV_EVENTS.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_EVENTS_GET'
    EXPORTING
      I_LIST_TYPE = 0
    IMPORTING
      ET_EVENTS   = FEVENTS[].
READ TABLE FEVENTS WITH KEY NAME = 'TOP_OF_PAGE'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    FEVENTS-FORM = 'Z_TOPOFPAGE'.
    MODIFY FEVENTS INDEX SY-TABIX.
    CLEAR FEVENTS.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE FEVENTS WITH KEY NAME = 'USER_COMMAND'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    FEVENTS-FORM = 'Z_USER_COMMAND'.
    MODIFY FEVENTS INDEX SY-TABIX.
    CLEAR FEVENTS.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM. "Z_ALV_EVENTS
*& Form Z_CREATE_FIELD_CATALOG
here the field catalog is created for the primary list *
no formal parameters *
FORM Z_CREATE_FIELD_CATALOG.
for the Plant
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'WERKS'.
FCAT-KEY = 'X'.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000005'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Plant'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'CHAR'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Material Type
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'MTART'.
FCAT-KEY = 'X'.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000006'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'MatTyp'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'CHAR'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Material No.
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'MATNR'.
FCAT-KEY = 'X'.
fcat-hotspot = 'X'.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000018'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Material'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'CHAR'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Material Description
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'MAKTX'.
FCAT-KEY = ''.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000040'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Description'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'CHAR'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Unit of Measure
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'MEINS'.
FCAT-KEY = ''.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '03'.
FCAT-JUST = 'C'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'UOM'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'UNIT'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Plant
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'MONTH'.
FCAT-KEY = 'X'.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '08'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'MONTH'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'C'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'CHAR'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Opening Stock
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'C_STK'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Opening Stock'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
fcat-do_sum = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Total Receipts
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'TRECEP'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Total Receipts'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
FCAT-DO_SUM = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Production
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'PRODU'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Production'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
FCAT-DO_SUM = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
for the Other Plant Receipts
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'RECEP'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Othr Plnt Recpts'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
FCAT-DO_SUM = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
Sales Return
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'SAL_RET'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Sales Return'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
FCAT-DO_SUM = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.
CLEAR FCAT.
Total Dispatches
FCAT-FIELDNAME = 'TDISP'.
FCAT-HOTSPOT = ' '.
FCAT-OUTPUTLEN = '000016'.
FCAT-JUST = 'L'.
FCAT-SELTEXT_M = 'Total Dispatches'.
FCAT-DDICTXT = 'M'.
FCAT-INTTYPE = 'Q'.
FCAT-DATATYPE = 'QUAN'.
FCAT-DO_SUM = 'X'.
FCAT-JUST = 'R'.
FCAT-NO_ZERO = 'X'.
APPEND FCAT.

Issue in ALV Report

Hi,
I have a issue in ALV Report for displaying one field's data into output.
I am getting data into all other fields in ALV Report except for this field.
This field & related fields are declared as below: in final internal table.
sta_no     TYPE z3status,
status(10) TYPE c,
Here z3status is of type Char(1).
In Report
I have put a condition :
IF i_tab-sta_no EQ 1.
   i_tab-status = 'Created'.
ELSE.
   i_tab-status = 'Closed'.
ENDIF.
and to field catalog also i am passing right information as for every other field in ALV Report.
Till the point use of REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY F.M also final internal table is having status field filled.
But in output nothing gets displayed for Status field.
Can anybody tell me what can be the issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi,
I have no problem in data fetching into final internal table.
Everything is coming well to REUSE_ALV_DISPLAY F.M.
But still Status field data is not getting displayed.
I have posted some code for reference:
        LOOP AT t_z3manboxid INTO wa_z3manboxid.
          wa_result-manifest_no     = wa_z3manboxid-zmanno.
          wa_result-item_no         = wa_z3manboxid-item_no.
          IF l_item_no NE wa_z3manboxid-item_no.
            wa_result-piece_quantity = wa_z3manboxid-vemng.
            wa_result-unit            = wa_z3manboxid-vemeh.
            wa_result-manifester      = wa_z3manboxid-usnam.
            wa_result-manifest_sta_no = wa_z3manboxid-z3status.
            IF wa_result-manifest_sta_no EQ 1.
              wa_result-manifest_status = c_created.
            ELSEIF wa_result-manifest_sta_no EQ 2.
              wa_result-manifest_status = c_in_transit.
            ELSEIF wa_result-manifest_sta_no EQ 3.
              wa_result-manifest_status = c_arrived.
            ELSEIF wa_result-manifest_sta_no EQ 4.
              wa_result-manifest_status = c_closed.
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
          l_item_no = wa_z3manboxid-item_no.
          APPEND wa_result TO t_result.
          CLEAR: wa_result, wa_z3manboxid.
        ENDLOOP.
Building field catalog following code is added:
For status call is as below:
PERFORM f_build_fieldcat USING c_tab
                                  c_manifest_status
                                  c_space
                                  c_space
                                  c_mannf_status
                                  c_space1
                                  15.
FORM f_build_fieldcat USING p_tabname p_fldname
                            p_rtabname p_rfldname
                            p_fldhdg p_check
                            p_length.
CLEAR t_fieldcat_ln1.
ADD 1 TO g_col_pos.
t_fieldcat_ln1-tabname       = p_tabname.
t_fieldcat_ln1-fieldname     = p_fldname.
t_fieldcat_ln1-ref_tabname   = p_rtabname.
t_fieldcat_ln1-ref_fieldname = p_rfldname.
t_fieldcat_ln1-ddictxt       = c_l.
t_fieldcat_ln1-seltext_l     = p_fldhdg.
t_fieldcat_ln1-no_zero       = space.
t_fieldcat_ln1-do_sum        = space.
t_fieldcat_ln1-col_pos       = g_col_pos.
t_fieldcat_ln1-no_out        = space.
t_fieldcat_ln1-just          = c_c.
t_fieldcat_ln1-qfieldname    = space.
t_fieldcat_ln1-checkbox      = p_check.
t_fieldcat_ln1-input         = p_check.
t_fieldcat_ln1-reptext_ddic = p_fldhdg.
IF p_fldname EQ c_manno.
    t_fieldcat_ln1-key     = c_x.
    t_fieldcat_ln1-hotspot = c_x.
ELSE.
    t_fieldcat_ln1-key     = space.
    t_fieldcat_ln1-hotspot = p_check.
ENDIF.
t_fieldcat_ln1-outputlen      = p_length.
t_fieldcat_ln1-intlen         = p_length.
t_fieldcat_ln1-ddic_outputlen = p_length.
APPEND t_fieldcat_ln1 TO t_fieldcat1.
ENDFORM.                    " f_build_fieldcat
FORM f_build_sortcat USING p_fldname.
CLEAR t_sortcat_ln1.
ADD 1 TO g_col_pos.
t_sortcat_ln1-spos      = g_col_pos.
t_sortcat_ln1-fieldname = p_fldname.
t_sortcat_ln1-up        = c_x.
t_sortcat_ln1-down      = space.
t_sortcat_ln1-subtot    = c_x.
APPEND t_sortcat_ln1 TO t_sortcat1.
ENDFORM.                    " f_build_sortcat
FORM f_build_layout.
t_layout1-zebra           = c_x.
t_layout1-no_vline        = c_space1.
t_layout1-reprep          = c_x.
t_layout1-detail_popup    = c_x.
t_layout1-window_titlebar = text-005.
t_layout1-no_scrolling    = c_space1.
t_layout1-detail_titlebar = text-005.
t_layout1-numc_sum        = c_x.
t_layout1-get_selinfos    = c_x.
t_layout1-min_linesize    = 132.
ENDFORM.                    " f_build_layout
DATA: l_pgm TYPE syrepid,
        l_exit(1) TYPE c.
CLEAR: l_pgm,
         l_exit.
l_pgm = sy-repid.
CALL FUNCTION 'REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY'
       EXPORTING
            i_callback_program      = l_pgm
            i_callback_user_command = c_user_command
            is_layout               = t_layout1
            it_fieldcat             = t_fieldcat1
            i_save                  = c_a
            it_events               = t_eventcat1
       IMPORTING
            e_exit_caused_by_caller = l_exit
       TABLES
            t_outtab                = t_result
       EXCEPTIONS
            program_error           = 1
            OTHERS                  = 2.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    l_exit = l_exit.
ENDIF.
To ALV F.M t_result table is updated with correct data.
But it is not getting displayed.
What can be the reason!
Can anybody give the solution!
Thanks for your replies.
Thanks,
Deep.

Performance issue when using select count on large tables

Hello Experts,
I have a requirement where i need to get count of data from a database table.Later on i need to display the count in ALV format.
As per my requirement, I have to use this select count inside a nested loops.
Below is the count snippet:
LOOP at systems assigning <fs_sc_systems>.
LOOP at date assigning <fs_sc_date>.
SELECT COUNT( DISTINCT crmd_orderadm_i~header )
   FROM crmd_orderadm_i
   INNER JOIN bbp_pdigp
       ON crmd_orderadm_iclient EQ bbp_pdigpclient               "MANDT is referred as client
     AND crmd_orderadm_iguid EQ bbp_pdigpguid
     INTO w_sc_count
WHERE crmd_orderadm_i~created_at BETWEEN <fs_sc_date>-start_timestamp
     AND <fs_sc_date>-end_timestamp
     AND bbp_pdigp~zz_scsys   EQ <fs_sc_systems>-sys_name.
endloop.
endloop.
In the above code snippet,
<fs_sc_systems>-sys_name is having the system name,
<fs_sc_date>-start_timestamp is having the start date of month
and <fs_sc_date>-end_timestamp is the end date of month.
Also the data in tables crmd_orderadm_i and bbp_pdigp is very large and it increases every day.
Now,the above select query is taking a lot of time to give the count due to which i am facing performance issues.
Can any one pls help me out to optimize this code.
Thanks,
Suman

Hi Choudhary Suman ,
Try this:
SELECT crmd_orderadm_i~header
INTO it_header                 " interna table
FROM crmd_orderadm_i
INNER JOIN bbp_pdigp
    ON crmd_orderadm_iclient EQ bbp_pdigpclient
   AND crmd_orderadm_iguid   EQ bbp_pdigpguid
   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN date
WHERE crmd_orderadm_i~created_at BETWEEN date-start_timestamp
                                      AND date-end_timestamp
   AND bbp_pdigp~zz_scsys EQ date-sys_name.
    SORT it_header BY header.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM it_header
    COMPARING header.
    describe table it_header lines v_lines.
Hope this information is help to you.
Regards,
José

Performance issue: Calling a BAPI PO create in test mode to get error msgs

Hi,
We have an ALV report in which we display purchase orders that got created in SAP, but either got blocked due to not meeting PO Release strategy tolerances or have failed output messages. we are displaying the failed messages even.
We are looping the internal table of eban(PR) & calling bapi po create in test mode to get failed messages.
Now we are facing performance issue in production. What can be the alternate efficient way to get the error msgs with efficiency
Regards,
Ayub H.
Moderator message: duplicate post (different ID, same company...), see below:
Performance issue calling bapi po create in test mode to get error messages
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 9, 2012

Hi Suvarna,
so you need to reduce the number of PO-simulations.
- Likely you checked already, that all EBAN-entries should already be converted into POs. If there would be a large number of "new" EBAN-entries, they don't need to be simulated.
- If it's a temporary problem: give aid to correct the problems (maintain prices or whatever the error-reasons are) Then the amount of not-converted purchase requisitions (PR) should drop, too
- If it's likely, that your volume of open PR will stay high: create a Z-Table with key of EBAN and a counter, simulate (once a day) PO conversions and store the results in the Z-table. In your report you can use the results... if they are "new enough". From time to time new simulations should be done, missing master data might be available.
Maybe users should be allowed to start this 2nd report manually (in background), too -> then they can update the messages after some data corrections themself, without waiting for the result (just check later in online report and do something different in between).
And you might need to explain, PO simulation takes as long as PO creation... there is no easy or fast way around this.
Best regards,
Christian

Performance issue calling bapi po create in test mode to get error messages

Hi,
We have a report which displays in alv the purchase orders that got created in SAP, but either got blocked due to not meeting PO Release Strategy tolerances or have failed output messages .We are displaying the failed messages too.
We are looping the internal table of eban(purchase requisition) and calling bapi po create in test mode to get failed messages.
Now we are facing performance issue in production.What can be the other effecient way to get the error messages without effecting performance.
Regards,
Suvarna

Hi Suvarna,
so you need to reduce the number of PO-simulations.
- Likely you checked already, that all EBAN-entries should already be converted into POs. If there would be a large number of "new" EBAN-entries, they don't need to be simulated.
- If it's a temporary problem: give aid to correct the problems (maintain prices or whatever the error-reasons are) Then the amount of not-converted purchase requisitions (PR) should drop, too
- If it's likely, that your volume of open PR will stay high: create a Z-Table with key of EBAN and a counter, simulate (once a day) PO conversions and store the results in the Z-table. In your report you can use the results... if they are "new enough". From time to time new simulations should be done, missing master data might be available.
Maybe users should be allowed to start this 2nd report manually (in background), too -> then they can update the messages after some data corrections themself, without waiting for the result (just check later in online report and do something different in between).
And you might need to explain, PO simulation takes as long as PO creation... there is no easy or fast way around this.
Best regards,
Christian

Report Performance Issue - Activity

Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
Fina

Fina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping.

Report performance Issue in BI Answers

Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,

I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash

BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

Hi Masters,
I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
Current service pack we are using is
SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
Best of Luck
Chris
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

Ravi,
I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
they resolved it.
Regards,
Chris

Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !

This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.

Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02

Performance Issue for BI system

Hello,
We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
Kindly help me.

Hello SIva,
Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
Buffer                 HitRatio   % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB   % Free Sp.   Dir. Size FreeDirEnt   % Free Dir    Swaps    DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB)                                                                                0
   Table definition     99,60     6.798                                                   20.000                                            29.532    153.221
   Field definition     99,82      31.562        784                 2,61           20.000      6.222          31,11          17.246     41.248
   Short NTAB           99,94     3.625      2.446                81,53          5.000        2.801          56,02             0            2.254
   Initial records      73,95        6.625        998                 16,63          5.000        690             13,80             40.069     49.528
                                                                                0
boldprogram                97,66     300.000     1.074                 0,38           75.000     67.177        89,57           219.665    725.703bold
CUA                    99,75         3.000        875                   36,29          1.500      1.401          93,40            55.277      2.497
Screen                 99,80         4.297      1.365                 33,35          2.000      1.811          90,55              119         3.214
Calendar              100,00       488            361                  75,52            200         42              21,00               0            158
OTR                   100,00         4.096      3.313                  100,00        2.000      2.000          100,00              0
                                                                                0
Tables                                                                                0
   Generic Key          99,17    29.297      1.450                  5,23           5.000        350             7,00             2.219      3.085.633
   Single record        99,43    10.000      1.907                  19,41           500         344            68,80              39          467.978
                                                                                0
Export/import          82,75     4.096         43                      1,30            2.000        662          33,10            137.208
Exp./ Imp. SHM         89,83     4.096        438                    13,22         2.000      1.482          74,10               0
SAP Memory      Curr.Use %    CurUse[KB]    MaxUse[KB]    In Mem[KB]    OnDisk[KB]    SAPCurCach      HitRatio %
Roll area               2,22                5.832               22.856             131.072     131.072                   IDs           96,61
Page area              1,08              2.832                24.144               65.536    196.608              Statement     79,00
Extended memory     22,90       958.464           1.929.216          4.186.112          0                                         0,00
Heap memory                                    0                  0                    1.473.767          0                                         0,00
Call Stati             HitRatio %     ABAP/4 Req      ABAP Fails     DBTotCalls         AvTime[ms]      DBRowsAff.
Select single     88,59               63.073.369        5.817.659      4.322.263             0                         57.255.710
Select               72,68               284.080.387          0               13.718.442             0                        32.199.124
Insert                 0,00                  151.955             5.458             166.159               0                           323.725
Update               0,00                    378.161           97.884           395.814               0                            486.880
Delete                 0,00                    389.398          332.619          415.562              0                             244.495
Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM

RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M

Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.html

Earthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Is there a recommended limit on the number of custom sections and the cells per table so that there are no performance issues with the UI?

Thanks Kelly,
The answers would be the following:
1200 cells per custom section (NEW COUNT), and up to 30 custom sections per spec.
Assuming all will be populated, and this would apply to all final material specs in the system which could be ~25% of all material specs.
The cells will be numeric, free text, drop downs, and some calculated numeric.
Are we reaching the limits for UI performance?
Thanks

IOS 8.1+ Performance Issue

Hello,
I encountered a serious performance bug in Adobe Air iOS application on devices running iOS 8.1 or later. Approximately in 1-2 minutes fps drops to 7 or lower without interacting with the app. This is very noticeable in the app. The app looks like frozen for about 0.5 seconds. The bug doesn't appear on every session.
Devices tested: iPad Mini iOS 8.1.1, iPhone 6 iOS 8.2. iPod Touch 4 iOS 6 is working correctly.
Air SDK versions: 15 and 17 tested.
I can track the bug using Adobe Scout. There is a noticeable spike on frame time 1.16. Framerate drops to 7.0. The App spends much time on function Runtime overhead. Sometimes the top activity is Running AS3 attached to frame or Waiting For Next Frame instead of Runtime overhead.
The bug can be reproduced on an empty application having a one bitmap on stage. Open the app and wait for two minutes and the bug should appear. If not, just close and relaunch the app.
Bugbase link: Bug#3965160 - iOS 8.1+ Performance Issue
Miska Savela

Hi
Id already activated Messages and entered the 6 digit code I was presented with into my iPhone. I can receive txt messages from non iOS users on my iMac and can reply to those messages.
I just can't send a new message from scratch to a non iOS user :-s
Thanks
Baz

Performance issue in ALV

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for