Performance issues on Crm
Hi _
REPORTING THIS ERROR FOR ANOTHER CLIENT
I am having some performance issues, only from a response point of view.AT times the users just hangs and then all of a sudden it comes back to normal again.
I am running crm 4.0 on windows with oracle 9.2
I have advance server installed on my db server and windows 2003 installed on my apps server. I just lately installed an apps server , thinking that the load was too heavy.I am still having issues.
On my Db server, i Have 8.4 gigs of mhysical memory and on my apps servers, I Have 3.0 gigs of physical memeory.
I have looked at tcode st02 on both my db server and apps server. I have no swappign issues.
My only issue on sto2 on my db server is that I have almost 6 gigs ofextended memory free with a max of 1.3 extended gigs in use.
There is still however 714.424 in heap memory.
I have looked at tcode st02 on my apps server. I have no swapping issues as well.
My only issue on sto2 on my apps server is that I also have almost 6 gigs ofextended memory free with a max of 3.6g of extended memory in use.
There is no value for heap memeory
Looking at st06 on my apps server, physical mem available is 3.gigs with 555 megs free.
Looking at st06 on my db server, physical mem available is 8.33.gigs with 5.955 gigs free.
My utilization is on an average of 30 - 40 %
When goign into smlg , my response on my apps server show 2.75 seconds and on my db it shows 12,975 seconds ( this in st03 shows about 6.8 seconds)
My parameters on my db server is as follows:
ztta/roll_area 2000000 Byte Roll area per workprocess (total)
ztta/roll_first 1 Byte First amount of roll area used in a dialog WP
ztta/short_area 1600000 Byte Short area per workprocess
rdisp/ROLL_SHM 32768 8 kB Part of roll file in shared memory
rdisp/PG_SHM 16384 8 kB Part of paging file in shared memory
rdisp/PG_LOCAL 150 8 kB Paging buffer per workprocess
em/initial_size_MB 5910 MB Initial size of extended memory
em/blocksize_KB 1024 kB Size of one extended memory block
em/address_space_MB 512 MB Address space reserved for ext. mem. (NT only)
ztta/roll_extension 2000000000 Byte Max. extended mem. per session (external mode)
abap/heap_area_dia 2000000000 Byte Max. heap memory for dialog workprocesses
abap/heap_area_nondia 2000000000 Byte Max. heap memory for non-dialog workprocesses
abap/heap_area_total 2000000000 Byte Max. usable heap memory
abap/heaplimit 40000000 Byte Workprocess restart limit of heap memory
abap/use_paging 0 Paging for flat tables used (1) or not (0)
MY PHYS_MEMSIZE ON MY APPS SERVER IS 3071 AND ON MY DB SERVER IS 5321.
I JUST DONOT UNDERSTAND WHY I AM HAVIGN SUCH A BAD RESPONSE. i ONLY HAVE ABOUT 100 USERS BETWENN BOTHE DB AND APPS SERVERS
Appreciate any help -please
Hi Guys
Sortre dteh issue out. Problem was a response time bewteen my telephony system and the Crm system.The RFC response time was too long. We sorted the netwrok issue out.
Similar Messages
-
SAP ITS Performance issues with integration
Hi All,
We wants to know about performance issues if CRM and SAP ECC6 systems connected together with SAP ITS implemented ? What are the main things to be considered or evaluated? How the above scenario can be implemented ?
Thanks in advance
RamakrishnaHi,
New SP was released in February, and now most of the new bugs should been caught ,This has a Central Note. For SP06 it's Note 1527325 - Planning and Consolidation 7.5 SP06 NetWeaver Central Note to fix any issues. Most of the improvements in SP06 were related to performance, especially when logging on from the BPC clients.There you should be able to find a big list of fixes/improvements and Notes that describe those. Some of the Notes even have test description how to reproduce that issue in the old version.
hope this will help you
Regards
Rv -
Dear Experts
We are facing some performance issue in the CRM-WEBGUI . All the standard and custom one are slow it take more time to open.
However from the ABAP side is OK the response time is less than one second.
Any specific operation i have to perform in term of CRM ?
Regards
HaroonHello,
i guess you started the webUI for the first time, right?
At the first time it is very slow - SGEN does not really help here.
It should be much better if you call the same screens a second and third time.
See the link:
[CRM Webclient UI - Generation of views after system restart / upgrade|CRM Webclient UI - Generation of views after system restart / upgrade]
Kind regards
Manfred -
Performance Issues in IC Agent Search - Category and / or Status search
Hi All
We are encountering a serious performance issue in SAP CRM 7.0 WebUI for IC Agent Inbox Search, when using the provided selection criteria viz u2013 status, category etc.
When we click on search , we are getting a timeout for the same.
As per ST22 analysis, the timeout is occurring due to the read on CRMD_ORDER_INDEX table where a sequential read is timing out.
A Custom Index has been created on the CRMD_ORDER_INDEX table for improving performance.
In ST22 the standard tips mention
"Dataset resulting from database access is too large".
and
"Database has unsuitable index. Check index generation".
We have done a database inconsistency check and no errors are appearing for the index.
We also did a rebuild index in RSANORA but that has not solved the issue.
Any pointers that could help solve / analyze the core issue would be very beneficial.
I have a feeling using APPEND HINTS to curtail the dataset should sovle the issue, however i am not a DB expert.
If u have any suggestions pls let me know.
Thanks
Ron.Hi Ron,
Are you getting the search result if you limit your search for a specific date or for a specific transaction number. If yes then i believe your Indexing is still not proper. There are few notes available for improving performance of agent inbox for CRM 7.0. Did you check those notes?
Thanks
Arun Kumar -
ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal
Hi
we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
Regards
AjitabhHi Ajithabh,
Please apply the following SAP notes:
1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
I hope it helps!
Regards,
Gabriel Santana -
Performance Issue in Order.jsp
Hi Folks,
I am facing a performance issue in the CRM system. When I try to transfer 500 items from the Product catalog to the order, it takes around 8 mins.
The expectation is max of 1 min.
We are performing the ATP check via ECC and pricing via IPC. I would like to have your suggestions as to how I could improve this performance.
Thanks.
DeepikaFrankly, you may never be able to achieve that kind of benchmark.
But it is still worthwhile to trace for performance. Check the time taken by the (ABAP calls) components in the "Add to basket" action. The ISA runtime log will be very useful. Perform ABAP trace in the backend ST03, ST05 etc.
If you have not seen this note check if this is relevant.
Note 1089043 - Performance and memory problems in SAP E-Commerce
See if this note is relevant too
Note 1150302 - Deactivating IPC communication in Web catalog of Web shop
A different question,
What is this business scenario that expects a customer to select 500 catalog items in one shot and transfer to the basket. To me, it looks very highly unlikely scenario - unless you want to explain
If this is a kind of customerr specific view and you expect the customers to select all of the items in their view and load in one shot, you can design upload capability with ofline order create.
Easwar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com -
Dear expert,
We are using CRM 5.0 with PCUI and ICWC. We have some performance issues.
These performance issues occur mainly when we click on the Agent Inbox View in ICWC for the first time (per user per day). It happens also for the other views.
I cannot find any OSS notes which describe this issue. What is the best way to analyse a performance issue? Are there some basic tests that we can perform to understand the root of this poor performance?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance
Best regards
StephanieSandeep,
Were you able to resolve this issue? We are having similar slowness, (timeouts), where it only occurs the first time they go into Agent Inbox using Webclient on CRM 5.0. Then everything runs normal 1-2 second response times.
We are seeing slowness on the ABAP side, as all the traces on the HTTP side seem normal. The table which is being hit is CRMD_ORDER_INDEX - shared common table. I believe that it may be related to the amount of work items in the inbox, but I do not know what is the normal amount.
Is there a way to check the amount of work items in the inbox that is being loaded the first time? I am not a CRM functional user, but work on the basis team trying to help resolve this slowness issue. SAP is running diagnostics and they seem to be pointing toward either slow code or just too much data in the inbox.
What is the industry norm for managing these work items? Do they just delete them, archive, or I also saw something related to logical deletion.
Any information would be helpful.
Thank you.
Regards,
Khoi -
Performance issue after PT Upgrade.
Hakan and Team ,
We recently moved from PT 8.48 TO PT8.51.18 on CRM 8.8 Application.
After the upgrade, we tremendously saw big performance issues with PeopleSoft CRM Application. It freezes almost every day and all their work-force (call center representatives) go idle. It significantly impacts their productivity and eventually losing revenue.
can you please suggest few suggestion or DOC that will help us to improve performance on application and DB side.
Deatils :-
SQL SERVER 2005
Windows 2008 R2Hi,
Performance is always a difficult one to tackle.
It can be at so many levels, DB, Appserver, Webserver, CPU, RAM, Infra, etc.
At OOW2012, David Kurtz gave a great highly detailed presentation on this subject: CON9210 - Performance Tuning for PeopleSoft Administrators
http://www.myexpospace.com/oracle2012/smupload/scloader.cfm?SCID=257daa92-a6e8-411a-9806-2c22e56687d3
See if you can apply some of the keypoints from his presentation.
Regards,
Hakan -
Performance issue with BW Extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H
Hi There,
We have a serious performance issue with BW extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H in CRM . We recently applied SAP Note: 1330249 to optimise the performance, Even after applying the note it remains slow, Please can any one update the solution if they had same issue with this Extractor or know about this issue.
Thanks,
RHi Ramesh,
There are some instructions available in note 1330249 that shoul help you.
I don't know what is the current release in the system, but there are corrections to be implemented by Tcode SNOTE and also manual steps(in table SMOFPARSFA).
I hope it contributes.
Regards,
Sinara Moraes -
Report Performance Issue - Activity
Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
FinaFina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping. -
Report performance Issue in BI Answers
Hi All,
We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
Thanks in advance,I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
hope it helps
thanks
Prash -
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue
Hi Masters,
I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
Current service pack we are using is
SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
Best of Luck
Chris
BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issueRavi,
I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
they resolved it.
Regards,
Chris -
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
Performance Issue for BI system
Hello,
We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
Kindly help me.Hello SIva,
Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
Buffer HitRatio % Alloc. KB Freesp. KB % Free Sp. Dir. Size FreeDirEnt % Free Dir Swaps DB Accs
Nametab (NTAB) 0
Table definition 99,60 6.798 20.000 29.532 153.221
Field definition 99,82 31.562 784 2,61 20.000 6.222 31,11 17.246 41.248
Short NTAB 99,94 3.625 2.446 81,53 5.000 2.801 56,02 0 2.254
Initial records 73,95 6.625 998 16,63 5.000 690 13,80 40.069 49.528
0
boldprogram 97,66 300.000 1.074 0,38 75.000 67.177 89,57 219.665 725.703bold
CUA 99,75 3.000 875 36,29 1.500 1.401 93,40 55.277 2.497
Screen 99,80 4.297 1.365 33,35 2.000 1.811 90,55 119 3.214
Calendar 100,00 488 361 75,52 200 42 21,00 0 158
OTR 100,00 4.096 3.313 100,00 2.000 2.000 100,00 0
0
Tables 0
Generic Key 99,17 29.297 1.450 5,23 5.000 350 7,00 2.219 3.085.633
Single record 99,43 10.000 1.907 19,41 500 344 68,80 39 467.978
0
Export/import 82,75 4.096 43 1,30 2.000 662 33,10 137.208
Exp./ Imp. SHM 89,83 4.096 438 13,22 2.000 1.482 74,10 0
SAP Memory Curr.Use % CurUse[KB] MaxUse[KB] In Mem[KB] OnDisk[KB] SAPCurCach HitRatio %
Roll area 2,22 5.832 22.856 131.072 131.072 IDs 96,61
Page area 1,08 2.832 24.144 65.536 196.608 Statement 79,00
Extended memory 22,90 958.464 1.929.216 4.186.112 0 0,00
Heap memory 0 0 1.473.767 0 0,00
Call Stati HitRatio % ABAP/4 Req ABAP Fails DBTotCalls AvTime[ms] DBRowsAff.
Select single 88,59 63.073.369 5.817.659 4.322.263 0 57.255.710
Select 72,68 284.080.387 0 13.718.442 0 32.199.124
Insert 0,00 151.955 5.458 166.159 0 323.725
Update 0,00 378.161 97.884 395.814 0 486.880
Delete 0,00 389.398 332.619 415.562 0 244.495
Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM -
RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M
Hi James,
Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
Hello,
I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
(except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
Some questions:
1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
are returned?
3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
everything here, in house. To do this:
a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
any questions.
Regards,
At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
James, Ken:
FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
++
Sandeep
-----Original Message-----
From: SASMITA, DANIAR
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
issues
w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
We did that trick already.
When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
it is trying to open.
When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
not opening any cursor.
And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
consistently fast.
It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
James Min
Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
Oakland, CA 94612
james.minsun.com
510.869.2056
==============================================
Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.htmlEarthlink wrote:
Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
Like:
- a database version
- how did you test
- what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
and so on.
If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701
Maybe you are looking for
-
Can you please help on Service Classifications in Service Registry
Dear SDNs, I am new in this SOA Area, with no experience. I could not manage to find relevant details for the following need, If you could put some light into it would be great help and appreciate it. 1. I need the precedure how to create highrarchic
-
Can't open just created file in illustrator
Hello! Yesterday I created 4 logos and saved them in AI and today I can't open any of them. Illustrator says it's in know format and can't be open. This error happens all the time for last 2 month and not only with illustrator, but with photoshop and
-
I love my mac and love pages but sometimes I wanna chuck it out the window. Here is why - I have been working on my thesis and was inserting some table in the pages doc. No problem. Except that the tables are in horizontal layout/orientation while th
-
Report Error - Very Unusual!
Hi there, I'm getting an error in one of my reports (actually, it's more than one, but my "Income" report gets it more than most) which only occurs a few times a day. The report works fine between errors. The error is; Odbc driver returned an error (
-
How to modify standard programs
HI FRIENDS.......... is there any way to modify standard programs.....