Performance issues on Crm

Hi _
REPORTING THIS ERROR FOR ANOTHER CLIENT
I am having some performance issues, only from a response point of view.AT times the users just hangs and then all of a sudden it comes back to normal again.
I am running crm 4.0 on windows with oracle 9.2
I have advance server installed on my db server and windows 2003 installed on my apps server. I just lately installed an apps server , thinking that the load was too heavy.I am still having issues.
On my Db server, i Have 8.4 gigs of mhysical memory and on my apps servers, I Have 3.0 gigs of physical memeory.
I have looked at tcode st02 on both my db server and apps server. I have no swappign issues.
My only issue on sto2 on my db server  is that I have almost 6 gigs ofextended memory free with a max of 1.3 extended gigs in use.
There is still however 714.424 in heap memory.
I have looked at tcode st02 on my apps server. I have no swapping issues as well.
My only issue on sto2 on my apps server  is that I also have almost 6 gigs ofextended memory free with a max of 3.6g of  extended memory in use.
There is no value for heap memeory
Looking at st06 on my apps server, physical mem available is 3.gigs with 555 megs free.
Looking at st06 on my db server, physical mem available is 8.33.gigs with 5.955 gigs free.
My utilization is on an average of 30 - 40 %
When goign into smlg , my response on my apps server show 2.75 seconds and on my db it shows 12,975 seconds ( this in st03 shows about 6.8 seconds)
My parameters on my db server is as follows:
ztta/roll_area                   2000000          Byte   Roll area per workprocess (total)             
ztta/roll_first                  1                Byte   First amount of roll area used in a dialog WP 
ztta/short_area                  1600000          Byte   Short area per workprocess                    
rdisp/ROLL_SHM                   32768            8 kB   Part of roll file in shared memory            
rdisp/PG_SHM                     16384            8 kB   Part of paging file in shared memory          
rdisp/PG_LOCAL                   150              8 kB   Paging buffer per workprocess                 
em/initial_size_MB               5910             MB     Initial size of extended memory               
em/blocksize_KB                  1024             kB     Size of one extended memory block             
em/address_space_MB              512              MB     Address space reserved for ext. mem. (NT only)
ztta/roll_extension              2000000000       Byte   Max. extended mem. per session (external mode)
abap/heap_area_dia               2000000000       Byte   Max. heap memory for dialog workprocesses     
abap/heap_area_nondia            2000000000       Byte   Max. heap memory for non-dialog workprocesses 
abap/heap_area_total             2000000000       Byte   Max. usable heap memory                       
abap/heaplimit                   40000000         Byte   Workprocess restart limit of heap memory      
abap/use_paging                  0                       Paging for flat tables used (1) or not (0)    
MY PHYS_MEMSIZE ON MY APPS SERVER IS 3071 AND ON MY DB SERVER IS 5321.
I JUST DONOT UNDERSTAND WHY I AM HAVIGN SUCH A BAD RESPONSE. i ONLY HAVE ABOUT 100 USERS BETWENN BOTHE DB AND APPS SERVERS
Appreciate any help -please

Hi Guys
Sortre dteh issue out. Problem was a response time bewteen my telephony system and the Crm system.The RFC response time was too long. We sorted the netwrok issue out.

Similar Messages

  • SAP ITS Performance issues with integration

    Hi All,
    We wants to know about  performance issues if  CRM and SAP ECC6 systems connected together with SAP ITS implemented ?  What are the main things to be considered or evaluated? How the above scenario can be implemented ?
    Thanks in advance
    Ramakrishna

    Hi,
    New  SP was released in February, and now most of the new bugs should been caught ,This has a Central Note. For SP06 it's Note 1527325 - Planning and Consolidation 7.5 SP06 NetWeaver Central Note to fix any issues. Most of the improvements in SP06 were related to performance, especially when logging on from the BPC clients.There you should be able to find a big list of fixes/improvements and Notes that describe those. Some of the Notes even have test description how to reproduce that issue in the old version.
    hope this will help you
    Regards
    Rv

  • Performance issue in the CRM

    Dear Experts
    We are facing some performance issue in the CRM-WEBGUI . All the standard and custom one are slow it take more time to open.
    However from the ABAP side is OK the response time is less than one second.
    Any specific operation i have to perform in term of CRM ?
    Regards
    Haroon

    Hello,
    i guess you started the webUI for the first time, right?
    At the first time it is very slow - SGEN does not really help here.
    It should be much better if you call the same screens a second and third time.
    See the link:
    [CRM Webclient UI - Generation of views after system restart / upgrade|CRM Webclient UI - Generation of views after system restart / upgrade]
    Kind regards
    Manfred

  • Performance Issues in IC Agent Search - Category and / or Status search

    Hi All
    We are encountering a serious performance issue in SAP CRM 7.0 WebUI for  IC Agent Inbox Search, when using the provided selection criteria viz u2013 status, category etc.
    When we click on search , we are getting a timeout for the same.
    As per ST22 analysis, the timeout is occurring due to the read on CRMD_ORDER_INDEX table where a sequential read is timing out.
    A Custom Index has been created on the CRMD_ORDER_INDEX  table for improving performance.
    In ST22 the standard tips mention
    "Dataset resulting from database access is too large".
    and
    "Database has unsuitable index. Check index generation".
    We have done a database inconsistency check and no errors are appearing for the index.
    We also did a rebuild index in RSANORA but that has not solved the issue.
    Any pointers that could help solve / analyze the core issue would be very beneficial.
    I have a feeling using APPEND HINTS to curtail the dataset should sovle the issue, however i am not a DB expert.
    If u have any suggestions pls let me know.
    Thanks
    Ron.

    Hi Ron,
    Are you getting the search result if you limit your search for a specific date or for a specific transaction number. If yes then i believe your Indexing is still not proper. There are few notes available for improving performance of agent inbox for CRM 7.0. Did you check those notes?
    Thanks
    Arun Kumar

  • ERP Sales Order : Performance issues with Product Proposal

    Hi
    we are working on CRM 2007 solution and are facing serious performance issues with the ERP Sales Order functionality provided in the ICWC of this version.
    In our development we are adding items in the ERP cart as soon as the user clicks on the 'New Sales Order' button of the sales order sreen. We get the items by very simple and optimized call to the ERP system and then add these entities in the Item Cart (Item collection ...in simple sense).
    For adding 10 items the application takes 10 seconds and this is too much for adding just 10 items.
    Can you please provide any Notes/alternative solution to resolve this issue.
    Regards
    Ajitabh

    Hi Ajithabh,
    Please apply the following SAP notes:
    1061423 - Interaction Center ERP Order Performance improvement
    1262277 - Performance: CRM value help causes dumps in ERP
    1292817 - Performance: Reduce RFC calls during creation of ERP order.
    1319885 - ERP sales order search with external reference
    1326527 - Reducing number of RFC calls in IC ERP Sales Order
    I hope it helps!
    Regards,
    Gabriel Santana

  • Performance Issue in Order.jsp

    Hi Folks,
    I am facing a performance issue in the CRM system. When I try to transfer 500 items from the Product catalog to the order, it takes around 8 mins.
    The expectation is max of 1 min.
    We are performing the ATP check via ECC and pricing via IPC. I would like to have your suggestions as to how I could improve this performance.
    Thanks.
    Deepika

    Frankly, you may never be able to achieve that kind of benchmark.
    But it is still worthwhile to trace for performance. Check the time taken by the (ABAP calls) components in the "Add to basket" action. The ISA runtime log will be very useful. Perform ABAP trace in the backend ST03, ST05 etc.
    If you have not seen this note check if this is relevant.
    Note 1089043 - Performance and memory problems in SAP E-Commerce
    See if this note is relevant too
    Note 1150302 - Deactivating IPC communication in Web catalog of Web shop
    A different question,
    What is this business scenario that expects a customer to select 500 catalog items in one shot and transfer to the basket. To me, it looks very highly unlikely scenario - unless you want to explain
    If this is a kind of customerr specific view and you expect the customers to select all of the items in their view and load in one shot, you can design upload capability with ofline order create.
    Easwar Ram
    http://www.parxlns.com

  • Performance Issues Analysis

    Dear expert,
    We are using CRM 5.0 with PCUI and ICWC. We have some performance issues.
    These performance issues occur mainly when we click on the Agent Inbox View in ICWC for the first time (per user per day). It happens also for the other views.
    I cannot find any OSS notes which describe this issue. What is the best way to analyse a performance issue? Are there some basic tests that we can perform to understand the root of this poor performance?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance
    Best regards
    Stephanie

    Sandeep,
        Were you able to resolve this issue?  We are having similar slowness, (timeouts), where it only occurs the first time they go into Agent Inbox using Webclient on CRM 5.0.  Then everything runs normal 1-2 second response times.
        We are seeing slowness on the ABAP side, as all the traces on the HTTP side seem normal.  The table which is being hit is CRMD_ORDER_INDEX - shared common table.  I believe that it may be related to the amount of work items in the inbox, but I do not know what is the normal amount.
        Is there a way to check the amount of work items in the inbox that is being loaded the first time?  I am not a CRM functional user, but work on the basis team trying to help resolve this slowness issue.  SAP is running diagnostics and they seem to be pointing toward either slow code or just too much data in the inbox.
       What is the industry norm for managing these work items?  Do they just delete them, archive, or I also saw something related to logical deletion. 
    Any information would be helpful.
    Thank you.
    Regards,
    Khoi

  • Performance issue after PT Upgrade.

    Hakan and Team ,
    We recently moved from PT 8.48 TO PT8.51.18 on CRM 8.8 Application.
    After the upgrade, we tremendously saw big performance issues with PeopleSoft CRM Application. It freezes almost every day and all their work-force (call center representatives) go idle. It significantly impacts their productivity and eventually losing revenue.
    can you please suggest few suggestion or DOC that will help us to improve performance on application and DB side.
    Deatils :-
    SQL SERVER 2005
    Windows 2008 R2

    Hi,
    Performance is always a difficult one to tackle.
    It can be at so many levels, DB, Appserver, Webserver, CPU, RAM, Infra, etc.
    At OOW2012, David Kurtz gave a great highly detailed presentation on this subject: CON9210 - Performance Tuning for PeopleSoft Administrators
    http://www.myexpospace.com/oracle2012/smupload/scloader.cfm?SCID=257daa92-a6e8-411a-9806-2c22e56687d3
    See if you can apply some of the keypoints from his presentation.
    Regards,
    Hakan

  • Performance issue with BW Extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H

    Hi There,
    We have a serious performance issue with BW extractor 0CRM_SRV_PROCESS_H in CRM .  We recently applied SAP Note: 1330249 to optimise the performance, Even after applying the note it remains slow, Please can any one update the solution if they had same issue with this Extractor or know about this issue.
    Thanks,
    R

    Hi Ramesh,
    There are some instructions available in note 1330249 that shoul help you.
    I don't know what is the current release in the system, but there are corrections to be implemented by Tcode SNOTE and also manual steps(in table SMOFPARSFA).
    I hope it contributes.
    Regards,
    Sinara Moraes

  • Report Performance Issue - Activity

    Hi gurus,
    I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
    the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
    In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
    1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
    pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
    2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
    to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
    <Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
    Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
    any input is really appriciated
    Thanks in advanced,
    Fina

    Fina,
    Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
    since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
    if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
    Hopefully, this is helping.

  • Report performance Issue in BI Answers

    Hi All,
    We have a performance issues with reports. Report is running more than 10 mins. we took query from the session log and ran it in database, at that time it took not more than 2 mins. We have verified proper indexes on the where clause columns.
    Could any once suggest to improve the performance in BI answers?
    Thanks in advance,

    I hope you dont have many case statements and complex calculations that you do in the Answers.
    Next thing you need to monitor is how many rows of data that you are trying to retrieve from the query. If the volume is huge then it takes time to do the formatting on the Answers as you are going to dump huge volumes of data. Database(like teradata) returns initially like 1-2000 records if you hit show all records then even db is gonna fair amount of time if you are dumping many records
    hope it helps
    thanks
    Prash

  • BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Hi Masters,
    I am working out for a solution for BW report developed in 0bcs_vc10 virtual cube.
    Some of the querys is taking more 15 to 20 minutes to execute the report.
    This is huge performance issue. We are using BW 3.5, and report devloped in bex and published thru portal. Any one faced similar problem please advise how you tackle this issue. Please give the detail analysis approach how you resolved this issue.
    Current service pack we are using is
    SAP_BW 350 0016 SAPKW35016
    FINBASIS 300 0012 SAPK-30012INFINBASIS
    BI_CONT 353 0008 SAPKIBIFP8
    SEM-BW 400 0012 SAPKGS4012
    Best of Luck
    Chris
    BW BCS cube(0bcs_vc10 ) Report huge performance issue

    Ravi,
    I already did that, it is not helping me much for the performance. Reports are taking 15 t0 20 minutes. I wanted any body in this forum have the same issue how
    they resolved it.
    Regards,
    Chris

  • Interested by performance issue ?  Read this !  If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !

    This is the question we will try to answer...
    What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
    I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
    All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
    First of all, describe my computer...
    Operating System
    Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
    CPU
    Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
    Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
    RAM
    Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
    Motherboard
    EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
    Graphics
    PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
    EVGA Nvidia GTX 680   // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
    Hard Drives
    16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
    556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
    I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
    PSU
    Cosair 1000 Watts
    After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
    CPU Introduction
    I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
    Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it.  I used Prime 95 to get the result.  // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
    The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel.  The CPU gives everything it can !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
    (picture 1)
    Disk Introduction
    I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
    Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
    The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
    Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
    (picture 2)
    Now, I know my limits !  It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
    PPBM5 (H.264) Result
    I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encrypt time....  write.... Encrypt time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  39 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down)  ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
    GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
    (picture 3)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
    I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Buffering time....  write.... Buffering time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate !  Easy !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40.5 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
    GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
    GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????  Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
    (picture 4)
    PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
    I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
    Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5).  It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller.  Impossible !  Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage.  CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%).  // This kind of results let me REALLY confused.  It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
    (picture 5)
    PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
    I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
    The result :
    My CPU is not used at 100%
    My Disk is totally idle !
    All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
    The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down).  Probably caused by (Encoding time....  write.... Encoding time.... write...)  // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate !  Real Joke !
    CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
    RAM, more than enough !  40 Go RAM free after the test !  // Excellent
    ~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
    GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
    GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only.  Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
    Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
    (picture 6)
    Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process.  Why ????   Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management.  My hardware is idle !  I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ?  My computer want, but the software not !
    (picture 7)
    Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
    You can look the result in the picture.
    Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects.  CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
    Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
    (picture 8)
    Conclusion
    There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually.  GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card).  Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance).  I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU.  I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
    Premiere Pro, I'm speechless !  Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer.  Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%.  I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor.  But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post.  It's seem to be a bug...
    Thank you.

    Patrick,
    I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
    The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
    The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
    As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
    The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
    You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
    There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
    Just my $ 0.02

  • Performance Issue for BI system

    Hello,
    We are facing performance issues for BI System. Its a preproductive system and its performance is degrading badly everyday. I was checking system came to know program buffer hit ratio is increaasing everyday due to high Swaps. So asked to change the parameter abap/buffersize which was 300Mb to 500Mb. But still no major improvement is found in the system.
    There is 16GB Ram available and Server is HP-UX and with Netweaver2004s with Oracle 10.2.0.4.0 installed in it.
    The Main problem is while running a report or creating a query is taking way too long time.
    Kindly help me.

    Hello SIva,
    Thanks for your reply but i have checked ST02 and ST03 and also SM50 and its normal
    we are having 9 dialog processes, 3 Background , 2 Update and 1 spool.
    No one is using the system currently but in ST02 i can see the swaps are in red.
    Buffer                 HitRatio   % Alloc. KB  Freesp. KB   % Free Sp.   Dir. Size  FreeDirEnt   % Free Dir    Swaps    DB Accs
    Nametab (NTAB)                                                                                0
       Table definition     99,60     6.798                                                   20.000                                            29.532    153.221
       Field definition     99,82      31.562        784                 2,61           20.000      6.222          31,11          17.246     41.248
       Short NTAB           99,94     3.625      2.446                81,53          5.000        2.801          56,02             0            2.254
       Initial records      73,95        6.625        998                 16,63          5.000        690             13,80             40.069     49.528
                                                                                    0
    boldprogram                97,66     300.000     1.074                 0,38           75.000     67.177        89,57           219.665    725.703bold
    CUA                    99,75         3.000        875                   36,29          1.500      1.401          93,40            55.277      2.497
    Screen                 99,80         4.297      1.365                 33,35          2.000      1.811          90,55              119         3.214
    Calendar              100,00       488            361                  75,52            200         42              21,00               0            158
    OTR                   100,00         4.096      3.313                  100,00        2.000      2.000          100,00              0
                                                                                    0
    Tables                                                                                0
       Generic Key          99,17    29.297      1.450                  5,23           5.000        350             7,00             2.219      3.085.633
       Single record        99,43    10.000      1.907                  19,41           500         344            68,80              39          467.978
                                                                                    0
    Export/import          82,75     4.096         43                      1,30            2.000        662          33,10            137.208
    Exp./ Imp. SHM         89,83     4.096        438                    13,22         2.000      1.482          74,10               0    
    SAP Memory      Curr.Use %    CurUse[KB]    MaxUse[KB]    In Mem[KB]    OnDisk[KB]    SAPCurCach      HitRatio %
    Roll area               2,22                5.832               22.856             131.072     131.072                   IDs           96,61
    Page area              1,08              2.832                24.144               65.536    196.608              Statement     79,00
    Extended memory     22,90       958.464           1.929.216          4.186.112          0                                         0,00
    Heap memory                                    0                  0                    1.473.767          0                                         0,00
    Call Stati             HitRatio %     ABAP/4 Req      ABAP Fails     DBTotCalls         AvTime[ms]      DBRowsAff.
      Select single     88,59               63.073.369        5.817.659      4.322.263             0                         57.255.710
      Select               72,68               284.080.387          0               13.718.442             0                        32.199.124
      Insert                 0,00                  151.955             5.458             166.159               0                           323.725
      Update               0,00                    378.161           97.884           395.814               0                            486.880
      Delete                 0,00                    389.398          332.619          415.562              0                             244.495
    Edited by: Srikanth Sunkara on May 12, 2011 11:50 AM

  • RE: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte3M

    Hi James,
    Could you give me a call, I am at my desk.
    I had meetings all day and couldn't respond to your calls earlier.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: James Min [mailto:jminbrio.forte.com]
    Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2000 2:50 PM
    To: Sharma, Sandeep; Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: sophiaforte.com; kenlforte.com; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: Case 59063: performance issues w/ C TLIB and Forte 3M
    Hello,
    I just want to reiterate that we are very committed to working on
    this issue, and that our goal is to find out the root of the problem. But
    first I'd like to narrow down the avenues by process of elimination.
    Open Cursor is something that is commonly used in today's RDBMS. I
    know that you must test your query in ISQL using some kind of execute
    immediate, but Sybase should be able to handle an open cursor. I was
    wondering if your Sybase expert commented on the fact that the server is
    not responding to commonly used command like 'open cursor'. According to
    our developer, we are merely following the API from Sybase, and open cursor
    is not something that particularly slows down a query for several minutes
    (except maybe the very first time). The logs show that Forte is waiting for
    a status from the DB server. Actually, using prepared statements and open
    cursor ends up being more efficient in the long run.
    Some questions:
    1) Have you tried to do a prepared statement with open cursor in your ISQL
    session? If so, did it have the same slowness?
    2) How big is the table you are querying? How many rows are there? How many
    are returned?
    3) When there is a hang in Forte, is there disk-spinning or CPU usage in
    the database server side? On the Forte side? Absolutely no activity at all?
    We actually have a Sybase set-up here, and if you wish, we could test out
    your database and Forte PEX here. Since your queries seems to be running
    off of only one table, this might be the best option, as we could look at
    everything here, in house. To do this:
    a) BCP out the data into a flat file. (character format to make it portable)
    b) we need a script to create the table and indexes.
    c) the Forte PEX file of the app to test this out.
    d) the SQL staement that you issue in ISQL for comparison.
    If the situation warrants, we can give a concrete example of
    possible errors/bugs to a developer. Dial-in is still an option, but to be
    able to look at the TOOL code, database setup, etc. without the limitations
    of dial-up may be faster and more efficient. Please let me know if you can
    provide this, as well as the answers to the above questions, or if you have
    any questions.
    Regards,
    At 08:05 AM 3/30/00 -0500, Sharma, Sandeep wrote:
    James, Ken:
    FYI, see attached response from our Sybase expert, Dani Sasmita. She has
    already tried what you suggested and results are enclosed.
    ++
    Sandeep
    -----Original Message-----
    From: SASMITA, DANIAR
    Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2000 6:43 PM
    To: Pyatetskiy, Alexander
    Cc: Sharma, Sandeep; Tenerelli, Mike
    Subject: Re: FW: Case 59063: Select using LIKE has performance
    issues
    w/ CTLIB and Forte 3M
    We did that trick already.
    When it is hanging, I can see what is doing.
    It is doing OPEN CURSOR. But not clear the exact statement of the cursor
    it is trying to open.
    When we run the query directly to Sybase, not using Forte, it is clearly
    not opening any cursor.
    And running it directly to Sybase many times, the response is always
    consistently fast.
    It is just when the query runs from Forte to Sybase, it opens a cursor.
    But again, in the Forte code, Alex is not using any cursor.
    In trying to capture the query,we even tried to audit any statementcoming
    to Sybase. Same thing, just open cursor. No cursor declaration anywhere.==============================================
    James Min
    Technical Support Engineer - Forte Tools
    Sun Microsystems, Inc.
    1800 Harrison St., 17th Fl.
    Oakland, CA 94612
    james.minsun.com
    510.869.2056
    ==============================================
    Support Hotline: 510-451-5400
    CUSTOMERS open a NEW CASE with Technical Support:
    http://www.forte.com/support/case_entry.html
    CUSTOMERS view your cases and enter follow-up transactions:
    http://www.forte.com/support/view_calls.html

    Earthlink wrote:
    Contrary to my understanding, the <font face="courier">with_pipeline</font> procedure runs 6 time slower than the legacy <font face="courier">no_pipeline</font> procedure. Am I missing something? Well, we're missing a lot here.
    Like:
    - a database version
    - how did you test
    - what data do you have, how is it distributed, indexed
    and so on.
    If you want to find out what's going on then use a TRACE with wait events.
    All nessecary steps are explained in these threads:
    HOW TO: Post a SQL statement tuning request - template posting
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2009/02/basic-sql-statement-performance.html
    Another nice one is RUNSTATS:
    http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/ASKTOM.download_file?p_file=6551378329289980701

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can you please help on Service Classifications in Service Registry

    Dear SDNs, I am new in this SOA Area, with no experience. I could not manage to find relevant details for the following need, If you could put some light into it would be great help and appreciate it. 1. I need the precedure how to create highrarchic

  • Can't open just created file in illustrator

    Hello! Yesterday I created 4 logos and saved them in AI and today I can't open any of them. Illustrator says it's in know format and can't be open. This error happens all the time for last 2 month and not only with illustrator, but with photoshop and

  • Pages and page setup problems

    I love my mac and love pages but sometimes I wanna chuck it out the window. Here is why - I have been working on my thesis and was inserting some table in the pages doc. No problem. Except that the tables are in horizontal layout/orientation while th

  • Report Error - Very Unusual!

    Hi there, I'm getting an error in one of my reports (actually, it's more than one, but my "Income" report gets it more than most) which only occurs a few times a day. The report works fine between errors. The error is; Odbc driver returned an error (

  • How to modify standard programs

    HI FRIENDS.......... is there any way to modify standard programs.....