Photo Manager Pro

Not sure if this is the right place to ask these questions, but hopefully someone can help. 
I just installed the app Photo Manager Pro and love it ! 
When I sync my phone with my imac, where will the photos be synced to ?
Can I now delete the albums and photos in the normal "photo" app as  I have imported all photos into Photo Manager Pro.
Thanks for any help !

The best place to get help with that app is from the developers website:
http://www.linkusnow.com/photomanager/support/index.php

Similar Messages

  • TS1702 Photo manager pro question

    I have photo manager pro. Once I have the transferred from the original photo folder, can you delete them as I'm guessing it takes up twice the memory to have both?

    The best place to get help with that app is from the developers website:
    http://www.linkusnow.com/photomanager/support/index.php

  • Third party PHOTOS Manager app

    hi to all fellow apple users, i need to have a Third party Photos Manager app (i hate iTunes syncs) , which also provides the SET AS HOME/LOCK SCREEN feature just like the core photos app.... i downloaded "MyPics" app but it doesnt have dis feature.

    King_Penguin wrote:
    Only the photos in the built-in Photos app can be accessed vie the photo frame icon on the iPad's lockscreen or be used as wallpapers, third-party apps won't have access to it.
    Photo Manager Pro is another alternative photo management app which can copy phtoos to/from Photos, but again it can't be used on the lockscreen
    Thanks for this one, I was searching for something like that too and couldn't find anything.

  • I just put snow leopard 10.6.8 on my macbook pro and I was told that I could purchase Apature for photo management- now its says I need a different version.... is there an older version I could get? so frustrating.

    I just put snow leopard 10.6.8 on my macbook pro and I was told that I could purchase Apature for photo management- now its says I need a different version.... is there an older version I could get? so frustrating.

    The current version of Aperture requires 10.7.5 or later.
    Upgrade Paths to Snow Leopard, Lion, and/or Mountain Lion
    You can upgrade to Mountain Lion from Lion or directly from Snow Leopard. Mountain Lion can be downloaded from the Mac App Store for $19.99. To access the App Store you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.6 or later installed.
    Upgrading to Snow Leopard
    You can purchase Snow Leopard through the Apple Store: Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard — Apple Store (U.S.). The price is $19.99 plus tax. You will be sent physical media by mail after placing your order.
    After you install Snow Leopard you will have to download and install the Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1 to update Snow Leopard to 10.6.8 and give you access to the App Store. Access to the App Store enables you to download Mountain Lion if your computer meets the requirements.
         Snow Leopard General Requirements
           1. Mac computer with an Intel processor
           2. 1GB of memory
           3. 5GB of available disk space
           4. DVD drive for installation
           5. Some features require a compatible Internet service provider;
               fees may apply.
           6. Some features require Apple’s iCloud services; fees and
               terms apply.
    Upgrading to Lion
    If your computer does not meet the requirements to install Mountain Lion, it may still meet the requirements to install Lion.
    You can purchase Lion by contacting Customer Service: Contacting Apple for support and service — this includes international calling numbers. The cost is $19.99 (as it was before) plus tax.  It's a download. You will get an email containing a redemption code that you then use at the Mac App Store to download Lion. Save a copy of that installer to your Downloads folder because the installer deletes itself at the end of the installation.
         Lion System Requirements
           1. Mac computer with an Intel Core 2 Duo, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7,
               or Xeon processor
           2. 2GB of memory
           3. OS X v10.6.6 or later (v10.6.8 recommended)
           4. 7GB of available space
           5. Some features require an Apple ID; terms apply.
    Upgrading to Mountain Lion
    To upgrade to Mountain Lion you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.8 or Lion installed. Purchase and download Mountain Lion from the App Store. Sign in using your Apple ID. Mountain Lion is $19.99 plus tax. The file is quite large, over 4 GBs, so allow some time to download. It would be preferable to use Ethernet because it is nearly four times faster than wireless.
         OS X Mountain Lion — System Requirements
           Macs that can be upgraded to OS X Mountain Lion
             1. iMac (Mid 2007 or newer) — Model Identifier 7,1 or later
             2. MacBook (Late 2008 Aluminum, or Early 2009 or newer) —
                 Model Identifier 5,1 or later
             3. MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer) — Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             4. MacBook Air (Late 2008 or newer) — Model Identifier 2,1 or later
             5. Mac mini (Early 2009 or newer) — Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             6. Mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer) — Model Identifier 3,1 or later
             7. Xserve (Early 2009) — Model Identifier 3,1 or later
    To find the model identifier open System Profiler in the Utilities folder. It's displayed in the panel on the right.
    Are my applications compatible?
             See App Compatibility Table — RoaringApps.
         For a complete How-To introduction from Apple see Upgrade to OS X Mountain Lion.

  • Lack of EZ Photo Print PRO on the PRO-100 ONLY

    I've been using Canon printers for fifteen years, I think, so this is not so overly picky newbie observation.  For the last five years, iP4300 and 4500's, and a 9000 MK II.  All come with the Easy Photo Print EX, as does the PRO-100 printer.  Way too "EZ" for me, I can just use the built in printer dialogue boxes, thank you very much.  
    Not so long ago I discovered the Easy Photo Print PRO, which requires either an Adobe product, or Canon's Digital Photo Professional.   Not having a Canon digital camera, I did find a source to download the original DPP 1.0, then upgraded straight off of an EOS Canon page. 
    Very nice!  All of the dialogue boxes into one, or almost one screen.  And what is really worth the price of admission, the "Pattern Print."   What we old wet darkroom types called a "ring around."  Wow!  Fine tune your color profile w/o expensive profiling equipment. 
    So yesterday I got a new PRO-100 which added the Print Studio Pro to the DPP.  Of course I check it out.  HORRIBLE!   First, I just HATE this trend of gray text on black backgrounds.  Who thought this *&*^$% up?  Form did not follow function.  Then, all the choices, which seem to be pretty much the same as the EZPP PRO, are packed into a long slider box on the right.  Said sliders are very narrow, very hard to grab and move. 
    OK, I'll just no use this and continue with the EZPP PRO, right?  Wrong!  The latter recognizes both the iP4500 and the 9000, but not the PRO-100, while the new PSP sees all three printers.  Upon looking at all the current PRO printers, ONLY the PRo-100 does not list the EZPP PRO as compatible! 
    What's up with that, Canon?  This is illogical and really frustrating, especially for a long time Canon fan leading the charge against the Epson lemmings.
    I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling the various print programs, nothing changes. 
    So at this point, with my PRO-100 I'm forced to either wade through dialogue boxes or find my anger rising with PSP.   The bit of good news is that one can get a "Pattern Print" from Manual Color adjustment, "Print a pattern for color adjustment."
    Rant done.  Awaiting immediate resolution from Canon.  Yeah, right.

    Well, I didn't get into the Adobe, pro/con, did I? I'm such a gentleman. The only way I could hurt myself is to pay a lot of money (which I don't have to spare) for programs that just aren't intuitive to me, to look at those damnable gray print on black backgrounds eyeball breakers, and have the use and control of programs so locked down I can't make a transfer to another machine without a call to Adobe.
    I'm a hobbyist, not in the graphics business, so I have lots of options. Nor do I do things because "everyone" does it, or it was the first program out there (Photoshop.)
    For quick looks at files and simple things, Irfanview. For complete digital asset management, digiKam. Open source, designed by Linux users, is ported to Windows, with maybe 95% good results. If I ever started working with layers and photoshop type manipulations, there's always The Gimp.
    For a po' boy like me, these are all I need and all are free.

  • Photoshop CS5 - Compatibility with "Canon Easy Photo Print Pro"

    Hi,
    I have just downloaded and installed  the trial version of Photoshop CS5, only to discover that in the  Automate option  (Under Files), Canon's Easy PhotoPrint Pro is no longer  listed.
    Canon have advised that it is not their problem.
    I  found that with Photoshop CS3, that this method of printing, provided most  accurate colours,
    I would be interested in other subscribers, who have CS5 and who print with  the Canon Pixma Pro 9000,
    (1) Have you found a method of using Canon Easy Photo Print Pro, and if not
    (2) What settings do you find give the best results from your printer -  What options do you select in the print dialogue box, etc.
    Brian

    Hi,
    Thanks for this information - Canon came back to me with a similar responce.
    Pending a resolution, which allows something similar to  Canon's Easy PhotoPrint Pro to be installed as an "Add-in" to Photoshop CS5, I plan to allow Photoshop to manage colours.
    This requires you to disable the printer from managing colours.
    For those who have a similar problem and are not sure, how to disable Colour Management in the Pixma Pro 9000, the following is a quote from Canon:
    Thank you for contacting Canon Support. Your reference/ticket number is 1031274.
    We are sorry to hear about the problems you are having with your Canon Pro9000.
    Please go to the 'Printing Preferences' and then select the 'Main' tab.
    Here you will see a 'Colour / Intensity' option, make sure this is set
    to 'Manual'. The 'Set' button will now appear active, press this button
    and then go to the 'Matching' tab. Once here make sure 'Colour Correction'
    is set to 'None'. This will deactivate the colour management completely.
    Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact us
    on the telephone number below ensuring to quote your Canon Helpdesk ticket
    number noted in the subject line above. Alternatively, you can reply directly
    to this email by navigating to the link below.
    Best regards,
    Wayne Hudson – Canon Support Centre
    Tel.: 0844 369 0100 Select option 2
    I hope that will be of help.
    Brian
    Message was edited by: bht-at-Home

  • Is there a photo management tool/plug-in?

    I'm still test-driving LR. It's development functionality is really superb. Far better than any PP tool I've used in the past.
    One shortcoming that I find with LR, though, is its photo management tool.  I used ACDSee Phto Manager, among others, in the past, the photo management function in ACDSee was really good and intuitive. The following functions were really convenient in ACDSee that I find missing in LR.
    Grouping (in addition to sorting) by almost any criteria - original date, day taken, month taken, camera, focal length, etc.
    Displaying any number of attirbutes - camera, resolution, size, etc.
    convenient batch renaming
    Easy copy and move
    As you can see, these are all file management functions. Does LR have these functions as well?
    If not, maybe I'll have to use two tools after all - LR for development, and ACDSee Photo Manager for file management.

    Certainly, Lightroom is a photo management tool that compares well with ACDSee. There are probably advantages and disadvantages to each, but everything on your list is present in LR except the display of resolution (if by that you mean pixels per inch of the photo).
    Grouping like this can be done via the filter bar or smart collections
    The metadata panel displays attributes
    F2 renames in batches
    Moving photos is done via the folder panel. LR does not make copies, as the Lightroom paradigm does not include making actual copies; it does include virtual copies. You of course can create copies via a different tool, File->Export. You can make copies in your operating system.
    But if you want LR to have the same workflow/features/ease of use/etc, as ACDSee (or Bridge, or Photoshop Elements, or any other program), let's be honest, it does not. Programs work differently. You will have to learn the methods and mechanics of each program. Each has its pros and cons, and LR has many "pros" to its photo management tools.

  • Aperture vs. iView as a photo manager

    So, I've been reading a lot of the pro's and con's of aperture as a raw conversion tool, but I haven't been able to really find anybody talking about the pros/cons of Aperture as simply a photo management tool against programs such as iView. Opinions? Basically I'm wondering if it's going to be beneficial to buy the program now, learn the interface and use it as I would use iView so that once they get all the bugs worked out I can start doing my raw conversions with it as well.

    They really are difficult to compare, as each does things the other doesn't. And you are asking about Aperture's strongest features.
    I have not yet used iView 3, so my comments are about 2.6, 3 has some new features that compare favorably to Aperture
    So my take:
    iView:
    Pro -
    Handles very large libraries (I currently have about 85000 images in my iview catalog)
    Handles images regardless of where they are stored (online, offline, across many drives, dvds, tapes, whatever)
    Extraordinarily fast
    Very robust file-format support
    Fantastic slideshow and web export, adequate contact sheets
    Extremely deep (and correctly implemented) metadata support
    Seamlessly integrates with all third-party "helper apps" - whatever, and however many you choose
    Con -
    No side-by-side compare
    No raw editing
    Limited file conversion options
    Can be a little sluggish when importing (not when viewing) raw files
    Raw support depends on third-party drivers
    Slightly clunky interface
    Aperture -
    Pro -
    Beautiful, realtime interface
    Stacks
    Raw editing (though low-quality)
    Versions
    Side-by-side viewing/comparing
    Con -
    Files locked up in local library
    Only handles online, local files
    No archiving support
    Very limited file-format support
    Poorly implemented metadata support (ignores metadata from other apps, does not export metadata to other apps)
    Poorly implemented "external editor" support (very difficult to access raw files)
    Limited slideshow/web export. Adequate contact sheets
    Very poor quality exported files
    Basically - if Aperture could handle files from multiple locations (especially offline files) it would completely clobberize iView. But it doesn't, and although the side-by-side compare and stacks and versions are wonderful, Aperture's library and "doesn't play well with others" attitude makes it a mediocre (if not outright poor) digital asset management tool at this point in time.

  • Is Photos for Pro use?

    Perhaps it is just me, but I find Photos to be a serious step backwards.  All I wanted added to Aperture or iPhoto was the ability to select different editing software as can be done in Lightroom.  I like the improved Facial Rec, but the functionality has been totally destroyed.  The Flickr & Facebook connectivity was much better than Photos.  If you are using Aperture or Lightroom, in other words a pro, this is not, in my opinion, the photo managing software for you.  It seems Photo is for the consumer market; not the prosumer, or Pro market.

    Well you can argue feature by feature, but the editing tools are richer in Photos, the whole iCloud Library and cross-devices stuff is also a big step up on iPhoto. There are losses too - Places, metadata display and so on. It certainly seems to be built with an iPhone shooter in mind, but that is the most popular camera these days. So for me, there's little of use, but I do think the 'replacement for iPhoto' is a defendable position.
    But make no mistake, they have done away with Aperture. They've just decided that they're not working that end of the market anymore. Time to look at apps like Lightroom, Capture One and so on.

  • I try to open iphoto and it comes up with You have made changes to your photo library using a newer version of iPhoto. Please quit and use the latest version of iPhoto. I have downloaded photo manager and it's telling me to update but it wont update...

    I try to open iphoto and it comes up with You have made changes to your photo library using a newer version of iPhoto. Please quit and use the latest version of iPhoto. I have downloaded photo manager and it's telling me to update but it wont update...

    iPhoto is Apple's included program to manage your photo's and pictures.
    It receives updates over time with Software updates and new machine or iLife purchases.
    When iPhoto gets updated or a newer version is used, it may alter iPhoto support files, but newer iPhoto versions usually always compatible with older files which it then updates.
    If you used a newer iPhoto on your iPhoto support files, then they got altered to the newer format, older iPhoto versions can't read the older format.
    Somewhere along the line you somehow got a older version of iPhoto on your computer, you need to fine the newer version of iPhoto (not this photo manager, sounds like another program)
    Or somewhere along the line you used a newer iPhoto version (like on another Mac) and it altered the iPhoto support files on your older version of iPhoto.
    So the key here is to find the newest version of iPhoto and use that to access your iPhoto support files.
    If you didn't access your iPhoto support files from another Mac, then you should have the newer iPhoto version on your computer.
    Once you find it, and get it in the Dock, you should remove the older iPhoto version from your computer to prevent this from happening again.
    Lastly, if the newer version of iPhoto is somehow gone off your computer, you should be able to get a copy off the latest OS X install disk or iLife using a free program called Pacifist.
    http://www.charlessoft.com/
    Then you need to check for updates for iPhoto in the program itself, the current version is 9.1.2

  • My wife and I share an iCloud account for photo library and iCloud drive mainly for our family photo management, but we use different accounts for iMessage/facetime/calendar/etc. With Yosemite, I can't use continuity/handoff without dumping the photo

    my wife and I share an iCloud account for photo library and iCloud drive mainly for our family photo management, but we use different accounts for iMessage/facetime/calendar/etc. With Yosemite, I can't use continuity/handoff without dumping the primary photo iCloud account and thus our shared photo system. We are running yosemite OS X 10.10 and iOS 8.0.2... Is there any way to do this?

    my wife and I share an iCloud account for photo library and iCloud drive mainly for our family photo management, but we use different accounts for iMessage/facetime/calendar/etc. With Yosemite, I can't use continuity/handoff without dumping the primary photo iCloud account and thus our shared photo system. We are running yosemite OS X 10.10 and iOS 8.0.2... Is there any way to do this?

  • How can I access my parents iCloud account remotely to assist with photo management and printing?

    How can I access my parents iCloud account remotely to assist with photo management and printing?

    I tried that without any luck. I was hoping I could get Apple to reset it for me or delete the account so I could recreate it or at least tell me what is listed as my birth date, the security question answer.

  • T440s Fingerprint Manager Pro Driver no longer working

    Hi all,
    I just recently updated the Fingerprint Manager Pro Driver to the latest version 8.01.35.
    Now during the installation, an error pops up saying the "the plugin version does not match with the version of omnipass" however the installation still continues and finishes. 
    I click on the biometric devices in Windows 7 control panel, it is enabled. Then I clicked on the Fingerprint Manager, it says "Windows biometric support must be enabled to use this application. Enable biometrics in the Windows Control Panel."
    Previous driver version worked

    Same problem with X1 Carbon. Happened after uninstalling and reinstalling Synaptics Trackpad drivers.

  • Itunes document manager pro will not open a document with .cwk extension. It will catch the document then error message states that it cannot open document. Can anyone tell me what Im doing wrong?

    Itunes document manager pro will not open a document with .cwk extension. It will catch the document then error message states that it cannot open document. Can anyone tell me what Im doing wrong?

    Forgive my ignorance but I have never hear of iTunes Document Manager Pro. If you mean Document Manager Pro, i was able to find that. Back to your problem, have you tried opening one of those files in the iOS iWorks apps? Form the quick read that I did about this, .cwk files can be opened by Pages, Numbers or Keynote, depending on what type of document that it is and those files can be read by Document Manager Pro, after properly saving them. I don't see that you can go directly from the .cwk file in Document Manager Pro without converting them first.
    I took a very quick look at the app, so I may be a missing something about its capability.

  • Photo Management for old (import) & new pictures

    Below is a proposal for organising my photo management system.
    I'm a hobbiest photographer with over 30 years of pictures to file. I have read extensively, including this forum and sort best practice to developed a plan to do achieve an organised scalable system.
    I would appreciate sharing of experience by providing comments on my suggested plan of action and questions I raise below.
    My Objective:
    Organise and manage existing legacy photos and provide a system for future photos that is not tied into specific system or vendor. For example where possible Metadata free from vendor specific format or database.
    Background:
    My collection consists of many photos in over 50 folders, these are:
    a) Scanned picture that are now JPGs,
    b) Shot JPG,
    c) Raw (new and existing).
    I files my pictures on my PC & external back up copy.
    I file: /my pictures/<YYYY>_<MM>_<Location_Event>  for example: /my pictures/2013_04_Yorkshire_Family_Weekend.
    On some of my digital pictures I have included the Metadata using Google Picasa v3. Most of my scanned pictures have no Metadata as yet.
    I own and aim to use Lightroom 4 to do Post Production and photo filing and management whilst also continuing to use Google Picasa for viewing &amp; Face Recognition (at least until I feel fully confident in Lr).
    Suggested plan of attack:
    Stage 1)
    Add "My Picture" folder, including sub folders to Lightroom Library, Standard View.
    Stage 2)
    Continue with /my pictures/<YYYY>_<MM>_<Location_Event> 
    For example: /my pictures/2013_04_Yorkshire_Family_Weekend.
    Stage 3)
    Use Lr to apply to both existing and new photos file name format as follows: <My Initials>_<YYYYMMDD>_<Key_Words Inc_Location_Event_Description>_<sequence xxxx>
    For example:RB_20130420_Peru_Cusco_Holiday_Shots_0001
    NB: Regarding Version Control for RAW I will use Lr inc use of "Virtual Copies", for Jpeg I will use additional field for Developed JPEGs of <vX>
    For example:RB_20130420_Peru_Cusco_Holiday_Shots_0001_v01.jpg
    Stage 4)
    Manually use Lr to add Metadata &amp; Ratings to all pictures to date.
    Metatdata: Include "My Name" to all pictures, "Date" by Windows folder, "Keyword" by folder, "Additional Keyword" to 3* and above.
    Rating: 1&amp;2* no action required, 3*+ maybe further editing if time permits.
    Stage 5)
    Run "Save Metadata to file" in Lr. This will run Metadata to file for JPG and to XMP side car for RAW files.
    Stage 6)
    Import new shots to new folder using "/my pictures/<year><month number><event>" structure. As they are in sub folder they will be included automatically to Lr library.
    Stage 7)
    Create JPG in same folders as RAWs for Developed Photos.
    Stage 8)
    Back up "My Photos" and Lr dbase on regular basis as per Lr best practice.
    Questions:
    1) Is Lr more powerful than Google Picasa for Renaming File &amp; Adding Metadata? 
    2) Once I "Save Meta Data to Photo" in Lr will I be able to access it in Google Picasa?
    3) Can I automate the Importing of new shots to Lr and have it maintain / build upon my existing file structure?
    4) Any recommendations for Keyword Schema to include in Metadata?
    5) Does my approach above seem sensible?

    Honestly, if your goal is to have metadata that is not tied into a specific system or vendor, then here's what I would do:
    I would not put any effort at all into organizing your folders (or improving the organization of the folders), or renaming files, as I think your time is better spent on keywords. In my opinion, the benefits of keyword organizing are many; in addition, without you putting any effort into reorganizing your folders, you can also search for you photos by date inside Lightroom using Lightroom tools regardless of the folder structure (and you can search this way inside of any other photographic management software I have used as well, regardless of the folder structure).
    In Lightroom assign whatever keywords and metadata are appropriate, and then instruct Lightroom to write the metadata to the files. There are two ways to do this, one is Ctrl-S, and the second is to turn on the option in Preferences that does this automatically (Edit->Catalog Settings->Metadata) Once the metadata has been written by Lightroom, you now have metadata that can be read by any photographic software (and even all major operating systems) that I know of.  Having keywords in the file name is redundant, it doesn't help you find photos and faster but it does require extra work; and there is a limit to the number of characters you can have in a path\filename.
    Another point ... don't use Lightroom collections or pick flags as part of this "metadata that is system and vendor independent", as Lightroom does not write this information to the files.
    You ask for Keyword schema, but without knowing what your photo's subject matter is, there's no way I could give any advice.

Maybe you are looking for