PO calculation schema

Dear SAPiens,
i have a scenario that is i want to put some amount in  PO calculation schema under a condition type.for this amount i want to calculate vat/cst in my tax code.there alse i had put the same condition type in my tax calculation procedure.
so how can i get populate the condition value from PO schema to tax schema.
Regards,
Umu

Dear Murugan,
The requirement is like this bcoz this value will be added to calculate for cst/vat only.
suppose my base value is 1000.the excise will be calculated on this 1000 Rs say 100 rs
now normally the vat/cst is calculated on 1000+100(ED). but in my case there is some extra amount is there for which i dont want to calculate the ED but want to add for VAT/CST calculation only.
that is 1000100thevalue i put in my PO schema.
hope u understand my requirement.
Regards,
Umu
Edited by: Umesh Mishra on Jun 9, 2011 3:03 PM

Similar Messages

  • Maintain the acct key and accruals/provisions in the calculation schema

    Dear All,
    I have a problem during invoice posting.
    I create a new freight condition type & assigned it to the calculation schema. I also create a  new account key & assigned to the calculation schema in  accrual keys. Then done OBYC settings. During MIGO, its working fine. But when i post the Miro against po, giving an error msg., "Maintain the acct key and accruals/provisions in the calculation schema, Message no. M8434"
    plz help me to solve this issue.

    Have you ticked the 'Acruals' in control data 2 in M/06 for this condition.
    Regards,
    Piyush

  • Maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema-MIRO

    Hi,
    In PO we have maintained different delivery condition.
    When we are doing MIRO we are getting error "maintain the acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE.
    However we have checked condition type and calulation schema and found that acct key and accurals maintained.
    YLB9     BivacInspec.fee/Quan
    YLBB     LPRC charges/Quant.
    YLBC     Port charges/Quant.
    YLBE     Clearing Charges/Qt.
    Please suggest somesolution.
    Thanks
    Ashok

    Hi Ashok,
    In M/08  check whether   acct key and acurals/provisions in calculation schema" for condition type YLBB and YLBE are maintained or not.
    Also if they are maintained there then check in M/06 for condition type YLBB and YLBE  , whether accurals check box are checked or not...If not check and then try.
    Cheers!!!
    Utsav

  • Conditions in Calculation Schema not reflecting in Purch Info Record

    Hi,
    We are using calculation procedure TAXIN.
    We have maintained Calculation Schema & maintained required conditions.
    When we checked for maintaining these conditions in Purchasing Info Record, (Transaction Code - ME11 / ME12), these conditions are not appearing in the info record. But, the conditions appearing in the info record are not same as those in the Calculation Schema.
    Also, the conditions maintained in Info Record are not getting copied to Purchase Order (except Base Price P000).
    What could be the reason behind this? How to correct the same?
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

    Tax procedure condtions will not appear in the info record. for the conditon which is not reflecting in the PO, you may check in inforecord whether there is a check mark in condition record saved for approval; if so it is deleted

  • Calculation schema under pricing procedure

    in pricing procedure under calculation schema what is <b>Condition formula for alternative calculation type</b> and <b>Alternative formula for condition base value</b>
    what is the use of these functions?

    in this field u can creat ur own formuls to calculat base price or condition type value
    this are called routine.
    eg if u want to calculate the cond value on some logic the u can write ur logic in this routine and change the valuer of ur base price or Condution type
    simple eq will be rounding up the values of condition type 17 is the routien u can use
    hope this helps
    Reward if useful

  • PRICING PROCEDURE-CALCULATION SCHEMA

    Dear All,
    There are some queries regarding pricing procedure calculation schema.Please help me out:
    1) What is the use of the "Requirement" column in calculation schema in real time scenario?
    2) What is meant by "Alternative calculation type" and "Alternative base value" column?What is its use in real time scenario?
    3) In the Print column if we place "X",it says "Printing at item level (previous procedure)".What does this actually means?
    4) What is the use of "Accurals" and what effect does it have in the pricing procedure and pricing calculation?
    For all the above queries  some real time scenario example willbe highly appreciable.
    Regards,
    Indranil

    1) What is the use of the "Requirement" column in calculation schema in real time scenario?
    Requirement
    Use
        If the requirement is fulfilled (SY-SUBRC = 0), then output
        determination also takes into consideration output type or the access
        sequence, for which the requirement has been specified.
    Examples
        A possible requirement would be, for example, that a difference shoul
        be made between document currency and local currency .
    Definition
         Number of a subroutine (= form routine), that checks a requirement at a
         specific time.
    Use
         The standard SAP system contains some standard routines for checking
         requirements when copying. You can also define your own routines
         according to the needs of your company.
    Example
         If you copy a quotation to a sales order, the system can check every
         quotation item to ensure that the customer had not rejected them for any
         reason.
    2) What is meant by "Alternative calculation type" and "Alternative base value" column?What is its use in real time scenario?
    If you are using any Formula to Derive the Condition Type then you can use  Alternative formula to the formula in the standard system that
    determines a condition.
    Alternative formula for condition base value
         Formula for determining the condition basis as an alternative to t
         standard.
    Example
         An absolute header discount is, for example, distributed in the st
         system according to the cumulative value of the items.
         If the system, however, distributes the absolute header discount
         according to volume, a header discount of $30 results in the follo
         discounts:
         Item       Value  Volume              Discount
                                      Stand. disc.   Volume disc.
           1        $1000  2 cbm         $20             $10
           2        $500   4 cbm         $10             $20
    3) In the Print column if we place "X",it says "Printing at item level (previous procedure)".What does this actually means?
    If you Put 'X" , it will be shown in the Print Output..
    Print ID for condition lines
         Controls issue of condition lines when printing documents such as order
         confirmations or invoices.
    Use
         In releases previous to 4.0, the following print indicators are
         available :
         o   ' ' : Condition line is not printed
         o   'X' : Condition line is printed at item level
         o   'S' : Condition line is printed in totals block
         The following standard logic is set out for these printing indicators:

  • Accounting Key & Accruals Key in Calculation Schema (Pricing Procedure)

    Hi Freinds,
                   I have a query regarding use of Accounting Key & accruals key in the Calculation Schema (Pricing Procedure).
    What is the significance of Accounting key & accruals key in the calcuation schema?  Which Accounting  & Accruals keys have to be used for Gross price,Discount,Freight, tax etc in the Calculation schema? Please post your precious threads.
    Thanks & Regards
    Saeed Arif

    hi
    AcyKy - Account Key/ Accrls - Accruals:
    for SD module
    u2022     The values of the Sales Revenues, Sales Deductions, Freight Revenues, Tax Revenues, and Rebate Accruals etc. are going to be posted in the respective G/L accounts in Fi Module.
    u2022     In order to do this we assign account keys/ accruals to the different condition types based on their classification. The classification shown below.
    o     ERB Rebate sales deduct.
    o     ERF Freight revenue
    o     ERL Revenue
    o     ERS Sales deductions
    o     ERU Rebate accruals
    u2022     For Ex.,
    o     For all Price condition types like PR00 etc. we assign ERL - Revenue.
    o     For all Discount condition types like K004, K005 etc. we assign ERS - Sales Deductions.
    o     For all Freight condition types KF00 etc. we assign ERF - Freight Revenues.
    o     For all Rebates condition types BO01 to BO05 we assign in Account key ERB - Rebates Sales deductions and for Accruals ERU - Rebate Accruals.
    u2022     This account keys and accruals are in turn assigned to respective G/L accounts. So the system posts respective values in respective G/L accounts in Fi-Co Module.
    u2022     This also one of the areas of SD - Fi Integration. SD consultants assign the account keys and Fi Consultants assign the respective G/L accounts in T.Code:VKOA.
    Similarly for MM Module
    Account keys are EIN, FR1, FR2, FR3, FRE, etc...
    And in OBYC, we do necessary account determination for the same.
    For e.g. Freight Posting in GR
    Condition type FRA1, Accrual FR1 and in OBYC, assign Freight Clearing A/c to FR1
    During GR;
    Stock Account - Dr - 110 INR
    GR/IR Clearing A/c - Cr - 100 INR
    Freight Clearing A/c - Cr - 10 INR
    transaction event key is the Key that identifies different types of G/L account.
    The account key enables the system to post amounts to certain types of
    revenue account. For example, the system can post freight charges
    (generated by the freight pricing condition) to the relevant freight
    revenue account.
    use
    To enable the system to find the relevant account for provisions (for
    accrued delivery costs or miscellaneous provisions, for example), you
    must assign a transaction/event (internal processing) key to each
    condition type that is relevant to provisions in the step Define
    Calculation Schema.
    if u search on SDN or GOOGLE u will get many threads for this
    hope it helps
    regards
    kunal

  • Same Calculation Schema/Pricing Procedure- Same Vendor - Material & Service

    Hi experts--
    For subject matter(we are facing this issue in our organisation)  I did my search and found the below threads but conversation did not provide what solution is to be implemented. Can someone help?
    Currently we are using two unique vendor codes for tiding over our MM/SD problem even though vendor is same with same address,PAN & service tax registration.
    We are a LSP and only recently went live on ECC 6.0 EnP4
    warm regards--
    A.VENKAT KRISHNAN
    Same Calculation Schema/Pricing Procedure- Same Vendor - Material & Service 
    Posted: Aug 19, 2011 7:04 AM           
    Click to report abuse...
    One vendor is providing service & material to the same Pur Org
    Is it anyway to handle with only one vendor code for service & material procurement in same vendor account group with only one pricing procedure(calculation schema)?
    Ramesh Babu Nag... [Active Contributor Silver: 500-1,499 points]      
    Posts: 535
    Registered: 5/29/09
    Forum Points: 1,380
         Re: Same Calculation Schema/Pricing Procedure- Same Vendor - Material & Service 
    Posted: Aug 19, 2011 7:16 AM   in response to: ARUL MURUGAN1 in response to: ARUL MURUGAN1           
    Yes, you can do it. There shouldn't be any issue

    Hi,
    Yes its possible.
    you can use the same calculation schema for both so that with one vendor you can handle both material as well as service purchase.
    Please revert if you face any difficulties.
    Thanks & Regards,

  • Issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements

    Dear All,
      I am facing an issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements. The issue is -
    "Appropriate calculation schema is not being determined when a scheduling agreement is being created"
    The required settings which have been maintained are - The Calculation Schema (ZEIC31) has been created, Vendor Schema group has been created, Purchasing Organisation Schema group has been created, They both have been assigned to the Calculation schema in Schema determination, The Vendor Schema group has been assigned to the Vendor Master Record in master data creation.
    When I am creating the scheduling agreement, the system is by default choosing the calculation schema - RM0002. Thus I am not able to put the manual condition types which have been assigned in the calculation schema - ZEIC31.
    1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
    2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
    Regards,
    Sudhanshu

    1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
    As per "Define Schema Determination" in spro Purchasing document should pick the Pricing Procedure .
    After creation of scheduling agreement have chacked your values in Scheduling agreement (Purchase ORG ,Schema grp in Vendor)
    2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
    Check in Vendor mater is there any Plant specific Purcahsing data maintained.If it is plant specific Check purchasing data for that Plant.

  • Article Purchasing tax P8 calculation schema

    Please help with following situation:
    1 Purchasing Org for several Comp Codes
    Purchasing Org is not assigned to any of them
    Purchasing Info Records are created at Purchasing Org level
    When tax code P8 is entered for VAT, system issues following error no. 06388:
    ==========
    Not possible to set tax code without tax calculation schema
    Message no. 06388
    Diagnosis
    The system was not able to find an assignment of the entered tax code to a tax calculation schema, because either
    no company code has been maintained for the purchasing organization, or
    no tax calculation schema has been maintained for company code of the relevant plant.
    Procedure (system administrator):
    In the second case (no tax calculation schema maintained) define a calculation schema for the country of the company code via the Financial Accounting Customizing facility.
    ==========
    Of course, Tax calculation schema is assigned to country and tax code also is assigned to specific country.
    Is there any ways to fix this, except PIR creation at Plant level?

    You can create the Reg Info with the Plant and this message will not happens...

  • Condition type and calculation schema

    Hi,
    I would need to set up a condition type and set this into a calculation schema.
    The condition type is a kind of tax. (It must be percentage.)
    The tax amount increases the cost, asset value or stock value so the NET amount must be summed up with this tax amount and posted in the GR.
    Please let me know how to set up this condition type and how to set up the calculation scheme so that NET amount and tax amount could be posted in the MIGO.
    When creating a PO line itme with w material I would like to be able to set the NET amount there.
    When lookint at the Condition tab of the line item in the po I would like to see the
    NET amount
    The tax percentage calculated
    The total of these.
    In the MIGO I need to post the total.
    Thanks in advance,
    Agnes

    Hi,
       The option is available with Transportation Management in standard using Multi-dimensional calculation type. As of my knowledge, the full functionality is not available without TM, as there is no option to assign the scale type in MM.
        If you want to map the same scenario in MM without TM, then you may go for development. You may create a new Z table and maintain the kilometers and rate per km for each vendor and ship to party (customer number for the receiving plant). Create custom routine to pull the price (distance * rate per km) from the z table and calculate the total price based on the calculation.
       If the kilometers / route is changeable for each PO, then you may add the distance field in PO.
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Calculation Schema on Quotations...

    Hi people, ... Question .. , What is the Conditions Calculation Schema used by default when creating a Quotation ? does it uses the Schema related to the standar purchase order ? thanks !

    Hi,
    These are the standard pricing schemas used in standard SAP.
    1) RM0000 and RM1000
    For POs, quotations, and scheduling agreements
    2) RM0001 and RM1001 for Contracts
    3) RM0002 and RM1002 for purchase inforecords
    4) RM2000 for stock transport orders and stock transport scheduling agreements
    5) RMMP00 for determining the market price which can be entered for each material
    Thanks & egards
    Anilkumar Dalai

  • User Exit for PO Calculation Schema Determination by PO Document Type

    Hello,
    Due to complex pricing requirements for both standard inbound purchase orders and return to vendor purchase orders, we need two separate calculation schemas to be applicable to each vendor.
    I have configured the primary calculation schema (ZM1000) which is correctly calculated on our standard purchase orders.  Through ENHANCEMENT-POINT mepo_header_fill_neu_01 SPOTS es_saplmepo (program SAPLMEPO) we have implemented code to change the calculation schema to the return schema (ZM1002) if the document type is one of our return purchase order types.
    ENHANCEMENT 1  ZMEEI_PO_PRICE_SCHEMA_DETM.    "active version
    IF fekko-bsart eq 'ZR1' or fekko-bsart eq 'ZR2' or fekko-bsart eq 'ZR3' or fekko-bsart eq 'ZR4'  .
         fekko-kalsm = 'ZM1002'.
    ENDIF.
    ENDENHANCEMENT.
    We are facing an issue where once the data is correctly entered into the return PO and the pricing has been determined there are errors.  The following is observed in the pricing analysis:
    1)  The correct calculation schema is determined (ZM1002).
    2)  Pricing conditions which have a condition record under the main calculation schema (ZM1000), but which do not exist in the return one (ZM1002) still appear in the pricing.  This is an issue.
    3)  Price conditions which have a condition record under the new schema (ZM1002), and which should appear, receive the message "Condition record exists, but has not been set".  This is an issue.
    When the pricing is re-determined manually at the line item level, it recalculates correctly and issues 2 and 3 above are adjusted accordingly.
    Question:
    Is there something missing in our code above which is cause these issues or is there a better user exit we should be using to address this requirement?
    Thanks in advance!

    Melih
    What we ended up doing was using ENHANCEMENT-POINT item_process_main_01 SPOTS es_saplmepo (program SAPLMEPO) to re-price the line items automatically when processing.  This solved our issue.
    IF EKKO-BSART = 'ZR1' or EKKO-BSART = 'ZR2' or EKKO-BSART = 'ZR3' or
    EKKO-BSART = 'ZR4'.
    lf_ext_calctype = 'C'.
    ENDIF.

  • MRP minus Pricing calculation Schema

    Hi,
    Can anybody let me know the complete configuration steps including master data settings for implementing the MRP minus pricing in SAP Retail?
    Explaining my query here in details
    Supplier has provided MRP to the Retailer. Retailer has decided the margin and then calculating the supplier cost on which they will procure the items from supplier. Now here we know MRP, Margin and then calculating cost so doing exactly reverse pricing. There are few doubts in mind and same sharing with you
    1. Do I need to maintain first maintain MRP i.e. VKP0 = MRP?
    2. Then do i need to flow the VKP0 value to purchasing calculation schema for reverse pricing?
    3. What is the role of here SD pricing calculation schema WWS001 if we already know VKP0 = MRP?
    Please help me. If it is possible then please mail me complete documents for MRP minus in SAP Retail.
    Thanks,
    Ashish Kumar

    mantain the two condition one is to copy VAT condition and another is for required price which needs to be reversed.
    Noe create one routine from ABAPER and assign the same for the VAT condition as well as basic price condition
    logic for routine is
    Y = X-[(12.5/100)Y]*
    regards,
    sujit

  • Unable to determine a calculation schema

    Hi ALL,
    I am getting warning while creating RFQ:-
    Unable to determine a calculation schema
    Message no. 06248
    please tell me why this warning massage is coming,and how to correct this so that it wont show next time while i do business to same vendor.
    With Regards,
    Siddharth Shanker

    Hi,
    In the Materials Management area, a calculation schema - a framework of steps used to calculate costs, prices and taxes etc.
    pls chk whether calculation schema is defined thru following path
    IMG>>Materials Management >>>Purchasing >>>Conditions>>Define Price Determination Process>>Define Calculation Schema
    Br,
    Tushar Patankar

Maybe you are looking for